dc.contributor.advisor | 姜堯民 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chiang, Yao-ming | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 陳彥霓 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chen, Yen-ni | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 陳彥霓 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Chen, Yen-ni | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2002 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 19:09:39 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 19:09:39 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 19:09:39 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0090357002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34031 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 財務管理研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 90357002 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 91 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 為釐清經理人異動對公司日常營運決策及績效之影響及資訊內涵,本研究透過分析國內近五年來上市櫃公司樣本後發現,大多數發生經理人異動之公司多為一次且自願性之異動,而不是經常性之活動,此為一家公司經營權輪替之正常行為。至於其他發生非經常性異動之公司則多在5年內有高於2次以上之異動行為,此和該類公司經營績效不佳及集團內部有爭權行為有很大之關係。關於經理人異動事件宣告效果方面,本研究實證結果顯示,無論是何種異動原因,市場似乎皆呈現負向反應,且以非自願性異動事件負向反應程度為大。至於經理人異動對公司投資及融資比例之影響方面,本實證結果顯示,不同之異動原因對公司投資、融資比例之影響亦不同。以自願性異動事件來說,事件發生前之固定資產成長率呈現遞增的現象,顯示經理人異動前其投資決策普遍較同業為積極,而事件發生後卻轉而成為較同業保守,顯示新上任者可能因為經驗之不足而不敢採行太積極的策略,而其負債比例在事件發生前逐年遞減,發生後則呈逐年遞增的現象。至於非自願性異動事件,本研究發現其在事件發生前即開始採行較保守的投資策略,推論可能和此類公司基本面較差,或是經理人進行資產誤置之行為所導致,異動後新繼任者之投資轉趨積極;而其於事件發生前負債比例增加,發生後則呈現減少的現象。至於經理人異動後公司之績效情況,本研究結果顯示無論是會計指標或是市場績效指標,自願性異動樣本之結果在事件發生後公司經營績效皆較之前為差,和市場對事件宣告之反應相符合;但以非自願性異動樣本來說,事件發生後公司經營績效之指標皆較之前為佳,顯示當初事件發生時市場之反應似乎太過悲觀,但這部分的結果可能存在有存在偏誤(survival bias)之問題。上述的實證結果使得台灣公司經理人異動和市場宣告反應、經營決策及績效首次獲得連結,對投資人在未來從事投資時可作為參考依據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In order to understand the information content of CEO turnover to corporate operating decision and performance, from analyzing the listing companies between 1997-2002 in TW, this research found that the most CEO turnover is once and voluntary activity, this is normal in the daily operation. As for the other involuntary turnover activity, which often happened in the company with bad performance or takeover. As for the announcement effect about CEO turnover, the article found that no matter what reasons, the effect is negative, and more significant in involuntary turnover.About the CEO turnover influence on corporate investing and financing decision, this article shows that different turnover reason would result in different decision. Take the companies with voluntary turnover for instance, the fixed asset growth rate grew before turnover but fell afterward. I assume that’s because new CEO takes more conservative investment decision than original one. And the leverage rate in this kind of companies falls before the event but grows afterward. As for the companies with involuntary turnover, this article found that the original CEO took more conservative investment decision than new CEO, this might be because of the worse fundamental situation in this kind of companies or the asset misallocation of the original CEO. And the leverage rate of involuntary turnover grows before the event but falls afterward. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的 3第三節 研究架構 4第二章 文獻探討與文獻回顧 6第一節 經理人與委託人間所可能存在的代理問題 6第二節 經理人異動發生的原因 10第三節 經理人投資及財務決策因子 12第四節 公司績效指標 14第五節 經理人異動與公司經營績效的關係 17第六節 股權結構與公司價值之關係 19第三章 研究設計 24第一節 研究對象與範圍 24第二節 研究變數與定義 26第三節 研究假說 30第四節 研究方法與模型 32第四章 實證分析與研究發現 38第一節 經理人異動之敘述統計結果 38第二節 經理人異動對股東財富之影響分析 43第三節 經理人異動前後投資及融資決策比較 53第四節 經理人異動前後公司績效比較 59第五節 影響事件宣告結果之原因分析 63第五章 結論與建議 69第一節 研究發現與結論 69第二節 對股東之建議 73第三節 對後續研究者之建議 74參考文獻 75一、中文部份 75二、英文部份 77 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 84186 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 108193 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 120861 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 116965 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 137098 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 361858 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 278035 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 1226353 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 175581 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 29569 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357002 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 經理人異動 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 市場宣告效果 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 財務績效 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 投資決策 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 融資決策 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | CEO turnover | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 經理人異動對公司策略及績效影響之資訊意涵 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部份 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. 王惠昕(2001),「代理問題對公司股權結構與財務決策之影響」,碩士論文,國立中正大學財務金融研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. 呂彥慧(1999),「股權結構、監督機制、轉投資、交叉持股與公司經營績效之關係—以台灣新上市公司為例」,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. 李柏慶 (2002),「股東對於高階主管異動之反應」,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. 李淑玲 (2001),「重要管理階層更迭之股東財富效果」,碩士論文,國立中正大學財務金融研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. 吳政穎(2000),「我國上市公司股權集中度、薪酬設計與公司經營績效關係之研究」,博士論文,國立政治大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. 吳啟銘(2000),「企業評價」,智勝出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. 林佳陽 (2001),「我國上市公司高階主管異動宣告對股價報酬的影響」,碩士論文,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. 林明謙(2001),「股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究」,私立輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. 周賓凰、蔡坤芳(1997),「台灣股市日資料特性與事件研究法」,證券市場發展季刊,第九卷,第二期,p1-27。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. 張家智 (2001),「相對績效評量與總經理離職、薪酬之實證研究-考慮產業競爭程度」,碩士論文,國立中正大學會計學研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. 張明峰 (1990) ,「股權結構對公司績效影響之研究」,碩士論文,國立政治大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. 陳建宏 (2001),「公司經理人異動對股東財富與公司經營績效影響之研究」,碩士論文,朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. 曾玉潔(2000),「我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實証研究」,碩士論文,國立中正大學會計學研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. 彭雅惠(1996),「臺灣上市公司財務決策代理理論的驗證」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15. 葉銀華、邱顯比,「資本結構、股權結構和公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論」,臺大管理論叢,民國85年8月,頁57-90。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16. 楊善富 (2000),「台灣上市公司高階主管持股比例、績效與離職關係之實證研究」,碩士論文, 國立中正大學會計學研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17. 蔣芳育(1996),「大型企業領導者更迭之研究-台灣上市公司十年經驗分析」,未出版碩士論文,中正大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18. 蔡坤方 (1996),「事件研究法論-以台灣股票市場日資料為例」,碩士論文,國立中央大學財務管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19. 賴汝鑑(1984),「我國民營企業高階層主管變動對公司價值的影響」,未出版碩士論文,東海大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20. 戴淵明(1985),「公司控制型態與其經營績效關係之研究--臺灣地區上市公司之實證分析」,國立中興大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21. 顧啟聖(2001),「股權結構、高階主管薪酬與經營效率之研究--本國壽險公司之實證」,私立逢甲大學保險學系研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22. 歐怡岑 (2001),「高階主管獎酬、公司投資與公司價值關係之研究—以臺灣上市公司為例」,國立中正大學會計學研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文部份 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Agrawal, A, and N. J. Nagarajan (1990) , " Corporate Capital Structure, Agency Costs, and Ownership Control: The Case of All-Equity Firms", Journal of Finance 45,pp.1325-1331. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Allen, M. P., S. K. Panian, and R. E. Lotz(1979), “Managerial Succession | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | and Organization Performance:A Recalcitrant Problem Revisited,” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Administrative Science Quarterly 24, p.167-180。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. Antle, R., and A. Smith. (1986). An Empirical Investigation of The Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executive. Journal of Accounting Research 24 : 1-39. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. Beatty, R.P., and E. J. Zajac (1987), “CEO Change and Firm Performance in Large Corporations:Succession Effects and Manager Effects,” Strategic Management Journal , Vol.8, pp.305-317. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. Beaver, W. H., R. Clarke, and K. F. Wright. 1979. The Association Between Unsystematic Security Returns and The Magnitude of Earnings Forecast Errors. Journal of Accounting Research 17 : 316-340. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. Benston, G.(1985). The Self-Serving Management Hypothesis: Some Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 : 67-83. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. Berle, A., and Means (1932), “The Modern Corporate and Private Property:A Reappraisal/Comment/Hessen’s “Reappraisal”,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp. 273-299. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. Bonnier, Karl-Adam, and R. F. Bruner (1989), “An Analysis of Stock Price Reaction to Management Change in Distressed Firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11, pp.95-106. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. Brown, M. C.(1982), “Administrative Succession and Organizational | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Performance:The Succession Effect,” Administrative Science Quarterly 27, p.1-16。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. Byrd, Parrino, Pritsch(1998), Stockholder-manager conflicts and firm value, Financial Analyst Journal, AIMR. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. Charles J Hadlock, Gerald B Lumer(1997), Compensation, turnover, and top management incentives: Historical evidence, The Journal of Business, Chicago. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. CHAN, S. H.; J. D. MARTIN; AND J. W. KENSINGER. ( 1990), "Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value. " Journal of Financial Economics 26: 255-276. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. Chen, Carl R. and Thomas L. Steiner (1999) , "Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflicts: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividend Policy", Financial Review 34, pp.119-136. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. Coughlan, A., and R. Schmidt (1985), “Executive compensation, management turnover and firm performance: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics , Vol.7, pp.43-46. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15. Crutchley, E. C. and R. S. Hansen (1989), "A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage and Corporate Dividends", Financial Management 18, pp.36-46. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16. Defond, M. L., and C. W. Park. (1999), “The Effect of Competition on CEO Turnover.” Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol.27, pp.35. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17. Denis, D. J., and D. K. Denis(1995), “Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals,” The Journal of Finance 50, p.1029-1058. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18. Eitzen and Yetman, N.R (1972), “Managerial Change ,longevity ,and organizational effectiveness ,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp110-116 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19. FAMA, E. F. (1980), “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20. Friedman, S. D., and H. Singh(1989), “CEO Succession and Stockholder Reaction:The Influence of Organizational Context and Event Content , ”Academy of Management Journal , Vol.32, pp.718-744. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21. Furtado, E. P.H., and M. S. Rozeff (1987), “The Wealth Effects of Company Initiated Management Changes,” Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.18, pp.147-160. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22. Gamson, W. A., and N. A. Scotch(1964), “Scapegoating in Baseball,” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | American Journal of Sociology 70, p.69-72. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23. Gephart, R.P.(1978) ,” Status Degradation and Organization succession ”American Journal of Sociology ,Vol. 75, pp21-31 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24. Gilson, S. (1989). Management Turnover And Financial Distress. Journal of Financial Economics 25 : 241-262. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25. Gjesdal, F. (1981). Accounting for Stewardship. Journal of Accounting Research 19: 208-231. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26. Grusky, O.(1963), “Managerial Succession and Organizational Effectiveness | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ,” American Journal of Sociology 69, p.21-30。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27. Guest, R. H.(1962), “Managerial Succession in Complex Organizations,” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | American Journal of Sociology 68, p.47-54。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 28. Harrison, R.J., Torres, D.L., and Kukalis, S. (1988) , “The changing of the guard: turnover and structural change in the top management positions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, pp. 211-232. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29. Hannan and Dreeman (1977), “The population ecology of organizations”, American Journal of Sociology ,Vol.82 ,pp 929-964. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 30. Healy, P. M. (1985). “The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decision.“ Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 : 85-107. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 31. Helmich, D.L (1974).” Organization growth and succession patterns” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17 , pp. 771-775 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 32. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. , "The Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics 3, 1976, pp.5-60. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 33. Kesner, I. F., and D. R. Dalton (1994), “Top Management Turnover and CEO Succession:An Investigation of The Effects on Performance,” Journal of Management Studies , Vol.31, pp.701-713. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 34. LARCKER, D. F. (1983), “The Association Between Performance Plan Adoption and Corporate Capital Investment.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 3-30. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 35. Lubatkin, M. H., K. H. Chung, R. C. Rogers, and J. E. Owers (1989), “Stockholder Reactions to CEO Changes in Large Corporations,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp.47-68. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 36. Mahajan, A., and S. Lummer (1993), “Shareholder Wealth Effects of Management Changes,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting , Vol.20, p.393-410. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 37. Martin, Kenneth J. and John J. McConnell (1991), “Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeover, and Management Turnover,” Journal of Finance, Vol.46, No.2, pp.671-678. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 38. MCCONNELLl, J. J. (1995), AND H. SERVAES. “Equity Ownership and the Two Faces of Debt.” Journal of Financial Economics 39: 137-151. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 39. MORCK, R.; A. SHLEIFER; AND R. W. VISHNY. (1988), “Management Ownership and Market Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics 20): 293-315. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 40. MURPHY, K. J.(1985) “Corporate Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover.” Working Paper, Harvard University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 41. Murphy, K. J., and J. L. Zimmerman (1993), “Financial Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover,” Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol.16, pp.273-315. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 42. Osborn, R., L. Jauch, T. Martin, and W. Glueck (1981), “The event of CEO succession, performance, and environmental conditions,”Academy of Management Journal , Vol.24, pp.183-191. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 43. O’Byrne, S. F. (1990). Shareholder Return and Management Performance. Compensation and Benefits Review 22 : 30-37. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 44. Titman, S. and R. Wessels, "The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice", Journal of Finance 43, 1988,pp.1-19. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 45. Torwon,D. (1961) “ Executive succession in small companies” Administrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 6 ,pp228-239 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 46. Price, K.L. (1975), “The measurement of turnover,” Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 33-46. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 47. Puffer, S., and J. B. Weintrop.(1991). Corporate Performance and CEO Turnover: The Role of Performance Expectations. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 : 1- 19. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 48. Rappaport, A. 1986. Creating Shareholder Value : The New Standard for Business Performance. New York : Free Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 49. Reinganum, M. R. (1985), “The Effect of Executive Succession on Stockholder Wealth,”Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol.30, pp.46-60. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 50. Salancik and Pfeffer (1977), “ Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in US corporations” Academy of management Journal ,Vol.23 , pp653-664. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 51. Sloan, R. G. (1993).”Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. “ Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 : 55-100 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 52. Smith, Carson, and Alexander, R.A (1984). “ Leadership : It can make a difference.” Academy of Management Journal ,Vol. 27, pp 765-776 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 53. Warner, J. B., R. L. Watts, and K. H. Wruck(1988), “Stock Prices and Top Management Changes,” Journal of Financial Economics 20, p.461-492。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 54. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Theory of Accounting. Prentice- Hall, Inc. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 55. Weisbach, M. S. (1988), “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover,”Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 20, pp.431-460. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 56. WUNSCH, A.(1992), “The Effect of Executive Compensation Policy On Long-Term Investment Expenditures of Large Corporations.” U.M.I.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 57. Zajac E.J (1990), “ CEO selection ,succession, compensation and firm performance: a theoretical integration and empirical analysis.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, pp217-230. | zh_TW |