1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 經理人異動對公司策略及績效影響之資訊意涵
作者 陳彥霓
Chen, Yen-ni
貢獻者 姜堯民
Chiang, Yao-ming
陳彥霓
Chen, Yen-ni
關鍵詞 經理人異動
市場宣告效果
財務績效
投資決策
融資決策
CEO turnover
日期 2002
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 19:09:39 (UTC+8)
摘要 為釐清經理人異動對公司日常營運決策及績效之影響及資訊內涵，本研究透過分析國內近五年來上市櫃公司樣本後發現，大多數發生經理人異動之公司多為一次且自願性之異動，而不是經常性之活動，此為一家公司經營權輪替之正常行為。至於其他發生非經常性異動之公司則多在5年內有高於2次以上之異動行為，此和該類公司經營績效不佳及集團內部有爭權行為有很大之關係。關於經理人異動事件宣告效果方面，本研究實證結果顯示，無論是何種異動原因，市場似乎皆呈現負向反應，且以非自願性異動事件負向反應程度為大。

至於經理人異動對公司投資及融資比例之影響方面，本實證結果顯示，不同之異動原因對公司投資、融資比例之影響亦不同。以自願性異動事件來說，事件發生前之固定資產成長率呈現遞增的現象，顯示經理人異動前其投資決策普遍較同業為積極，而事件發生後卻轉而成為較同業保守，顯示新上任者可能因為經驗之不足而不敢採行太積極的策略，而其負債比例在事件發生前逐年遞減，發生後則呈逐年遞增的現象。至於非自願性異動事件，本研究發現其在事件發生前即開始採行較保守的投資策略，推論可能和此類公司基本面較差，或是經理人進行資產誤置之行為所導致，異動後新繼任者之投資轉趨積極；而其於事件發生前負債比例增加，發生後則呈現減少的現象。

至於經理人異動後公司之績效情況，本研究結果顯示無論是會計指標或是市場績效指標，自願性異動樣本之結果在事件發生後公司經營績效皆較之前為差，和市場對事件宣告之反應相符合；但以非自願性異動樣本來說，事件發生後公司經營績效之指標皆較之前為佳，顯示當初事件發生時市場之反應似乎太過悲觀，但這部分的結果可能存在有存在偏誤(survival bias)之問題。

上述的實證結果使得台灣公司經理人異動和市場宣告反應、經營決策及績效首次獲得連結，對投資人在未來從事投資時可作為參考依據。
In order to understand the information content of CEO turnover to corporate operating decision and performance, from analyzing the listing companies between 1997-2002 in TW, this research found that the most CEO turnover is once and voluntary activity, this is normal in the daily operation. As for the other involuntary turnover activity, which often happened in the company with bad performance or takeover. As for the announcement effect about CEO turnover, the article found that no matter what reasons, the effect is negative, and more significant in involuntary turnover.

About the CEO turnover influence on corporate investing and financing decision, this article shows that different turnover reason would result in different decision. Take the companies with voluntary turnover for instance, the fixed asset growth rate grew before turnover but fell afterward. I assume that’s because new CEO takes more conservative investment decision than original one. And the leverage rate in this kind of companies falls before the event but grows afterward. As for the companies with involuntary turnover, this article found that the original CEO took more conservative investment decision than new CEO, this might be because of the worse fundamental situation in this kind of companies or the asset misallocation of the original CEO. And the leverage rate of involuntary turnover grows before the event but falls afterward.
參考文獻 一、中文部份
1. 王惠昕(2001)，「代理問題對公司股權結構與財務決策之影響」，碩士論文，國立中正大學財務金融研究所。
2. 呂彥慧（1999），「股權結構、監督機制、轉投資、交叉持股與公司經營績效之關係—以台灣新上市公司為例」，國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
3. 李柏慶 （2002），「股東對於高階主管異動之反應」，碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。
4. 李淑玲 (2001)，「重要管理階層更迭之股東財富效果」，碩士論文，國立中正大學財務金融研究所。
5. 吳政穎（2000），「我國上市公司股權集中度、薪酬設計與公司經營績效關係之研究」，博士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
6. 吳啟銘（2000），「企業評價」，智勝出版。
7. 林佳陽 (2001)，「我國上市公司高階主管異動宣告對股價報酬的影響」，碩士論文，中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。
8. 林明謙（2001），「股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究」，私立輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
9. 周賓凰、蔡坤芳（1997），「台灣股市日資料特性與事件研究法」，證券市場發展季刊，第九卷，第二期，p1-27。
10. 張家智 (2001)，「相對績效評量與總經理離職、薪酬之實證研究-考慮產業競爭程度」，碩士論文，國立中正大學會計學研究所。
11. 張明峰 (1990) ，「股權結構對公司績效影響之研究」，碩士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
12. 陳建宏 (2001)，「公司經理人異動對股東財富與公司經營績效影響之研究」，碩士論文，朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班。
13. 曾玉潔（2000），「我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實証研究」，碩士論文，國立中正大學會計學研究所。
14. 彭雅惠（1996），「臺灣上市公司財務決策代理理論的驗證」，國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
15. 葉銀華、邱顯比，「資本結構、股權結構和公司價值關聯性之實證研究：代理成本理論」，臺大管理論叢，民國85年8月，頁57-90。
16. 楊善富 (2000)，「台灣上市公司高階主管持股比例、績效與離職關係之實證研究」，碩士論文， 國立中正大學會計學研究所。
17. 蔣芳育(1996)，「大型企業領導者更迭之研究-台灣上市公司十年經驗分析」，未出版碩士論文，中正大學企業管理研究所。
18. 蔡坤方 (1996)，「事件研究法論-以台灣股票市場日資料為例」，碩士論文，國立中央大學財務管理研究所。
19. 賴汝鑑(1984)，「我國民營企業高階層主管變動對公司價值的影響」，未出版碩士論文，東海大學企業管理研究所。
20. 戴淵明(1985)，「公司控制型態與其經營績效關係之研究--臺灣地區上市公司之實證分析」，國立中興大學企業管理研究所。
21. 顧啟聖（2001），「股權結構、高階主管薪酬與經營效率之研究--本國壽險公司之實證」，私立逢甲大學保險學系研究所碩士論文。
22. 歐怡岑 （2001），「高階主管獎酬、公司投資與公司價值關係之研究—以臺灣上市公司為例」，國立中正大學會計學研究所。
二、英文部份
1. Agrawal, A, and N. J. Nagarajan (1990) , " Corporate Capital Structure, Agency Costs, and Ownership Control: The Case of All-Equity Firms", Journal of Finance 45,pp.1325-1331.
2. Allen, M. P., S. K. Panian, and R. E. Lotz(1979), “Managerial Succession
and Organization Performance：A Recalcitrant Problem Revisited,”
Administrative Science Quarterly 24, p.167-180。
3. Antle, R., and A. Smith. (1986). An Empirical Investigation of The Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executive. Journal of Accounting Research 24 : 1-39.
4. Beatty, R.P., and E. J. Zajac (1987), “CEO Change and Firm Performance in Large Corporations：Succession Effects and Manager Effects,” Strategic Management Journal , Vol.8, pp.305-317.
5. Beaver, W. H., R. Clarke, and K. F. Wright. 1979. The Association Between Unsystematic Security Returns and The Magnitude of Earnings Forecast Errors. Journal of Accounting Research 17 : 316-340.
6. Benston, G.(1985). The Self-Serving Management Hypothesis: Some Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 : 67-83.
7. Berle, A., and Means (1932), “The Modern Corporate and Private Property：A Reappraisal/Comment/Hessen’s “Reappraisal”,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp. 273-299.
8. Bonnier, Karl-Adam, and R. F. Bruner (1989), “An Analysis of Stock Price Reaction to Management Change in Distressed Firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11, pp.95-106.
9. Brown, M. C.(1982), “Administrative Succession and Organizational
Performance：The Succession Effect,” Administrative Science Quarterly 27, p.1-16。
10. Byrd, Parrino, Pritsch（1998）, Stockholder-manager conflicts and firm value, Financial Analyst Journal, AIMR.
11. Charles J Hadlock, Gerald B Lumer(1997), Compensation, turnover, and top management incentives: Historical evidence, The Journal of Business, Chicago.
12. CHAN, S. H.; J. D. MARTIN; AND J. W. KENSINGER. ( 1990), "Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value. " Journal of Financial Economics 26: 255-276.
13. Chen, Carl R. and Thomas L. Steiner (1999) , "Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflicts: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividend Policy", Financial Review 34, pp.119-136.
14. Coughlan, A., and R. Schmidt (1985), “Executive compensation, management turnover and firm performance: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics , Vol.7, pp.43-46.
15. Crutchley, E. C. and R. S. Hansen (1989), "A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage and Corporate Dividends", Financial Management 18, pp.36-46.
16. Defond, M. L., and C. W. Park. (1999), “The Effect of Competition on CEO Turnover.” Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol.27, pp.35.
17. Denis, D. J., and D. K. Denis(1995), “Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals,” The Journal of Finance 50, p.1029-1058.
18. Eitzen and Yetman, N.R (1972), “Managerial Change ,longevity ,and organizational effectiveness ,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp110-116
19. FAMA, E. F. (1980), “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
20. Friedman, S. D., and H. Singh(1989), “CEO Succession and Stockholder Reaction：The Influence of Organizational Context and Event Content , ”Academy of Management Journal , Vol.32, pp.718-744.
21. Furtado, E. P.H., and M. S. Rozeff (1987), “The Wealth Effects of Company Initiated Management Changes,” Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.18, pp.147-160.
22. Gamson, W. A., and N. A. Scotch(1964), “Scapegoating in Baseball,”
American Journal of Sociology 70, p.69-72.
23. Gephart, R.P.(1978) ,” Status Degradation and Organization succession ”American Journal of Sociology ,Vol. 75, pp21-31
24. Gilson, S. (1989). Management Turnover And Financial Distress. Journal of Financial Economics 25 : 241-262.
25. Gjesdal, F. (1981). Accounting for Stewardship. Journal of Accounting Research 19: 208-231.
26. Grusky, O.(1963), “Managerial Succession and Organizational Effectiveness
,” American Journal of Sociology 69, p.21-30。
27. Guest, R. H.(1962), “Managerial Succession in Complex Organizations,”
American Journal of Sociology 68, p.47-54。
28. Harrison, R.J., Torres, D.L., and Kukalis, S. (1988) , “The changing of the guard： turnover and structural change in the top management positions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, pp. 211-232.
29. Hannan and Dreeman (1977), “The population ecology of organizations”, American Journal of Sociology ,Vol.82 ,pp 929-964.
30. Healy, P. M. (1985). “The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decision.“ Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 : 85-107.
31. Helmich, D.L (1974).” Organization growth and succession patterns” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17 , pp. 771-775
32. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. , "The Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics 3, 1976, pp.5-60.
33. Kesner, I. F., and D. R. Dalton (1994), “Top Management Turnover and CEO Succession：An Investigation of The Effects on Performance,” Journal of Management Studies , Vol.31, pp.701-713.
34. LARCKER, D. F. (1983), “The Association Between Performance Plan Adoption and Corporate Capital Investment.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 3-30.
35. Lubatkin, M. H., K. H. Chung, R. C. Rogers, and J. E. Owers (1989), “Stockholder Reactions to CEO Changes in Large Corporations,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp.47-68.
36. Mahajan, A., and S. Lummer (1993), “Shareholder Wealth Effects of Management Changes,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting , Vol.20, p.393-410.
37. Martin, Kenneth J. and John J. McConnell (1991), “Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeover, and Management Turnover,” Journal of Finance, Vol.46, No.2, pp.671-678.
38. MCCONNELLl, J. J. (1995), AND H. SERVAES. “Equity Ownership and the Two Faces of Debt.” Journal of Financial Economics 39: 137-151.
39. MORCK, R.; A. SHLEIFER; AND R. W. VISHNY. (1988), “Management Ownership and Market Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics 20): 293-315.
40. MURPHY, K. J.(1985) “Corporate Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover.” Working Paper, Harvard University.
41. Murphy, K. J., and J. L. Zimmerman (1993), “Financial Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover,” Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol.16, pp.273-315.
42. Osborn, R., L. Jauch, T. Martin, and W. Glueck (1981), “The event of CEO succession, performance, and environmental conditions,”Academy of Management Journal , Vol.24, pp.183-191.
43. O’Byrne, S. F. (1990). Shareholder Return and Management Performance. Compensation and Benefits Review 22 : 30-37.
44. Titman, S. and R. Wessels, "The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice", Journal of Finance 43, 1988,pp.1-19.
45. Torwon,D. (1961) “ Executive succession in small companies” Administrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 6 ,pp228-239
46. Price, K.L. (1975), “The measurement of turnover,” Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 33-46.
47. Puffer, S., and J. B. Weintrop.(1991). Corporate Performance and CEO Turnover: The Role of Performance Expectations. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 : 1- 19.
48. Rappaport, A. 1986. Creating Shareholder Value : The New Standard for Business Performance. New York : Free Press.
49. Reinganum, M. R. (1985), “The Effect of Executive Succession on Stockholder Wealth,”Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol.30, pp.46-60.
50. Salancik and Pfeffer (1977), “ Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in US corporations” Academy of management Journal ,Vol.23 , pp653-664.
51. Sloan, R. G. (1993).”Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. “ Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 : 55-100
52. Smith, Carson, and Alexander, R.A (1984). “ Leadership : It can make a difference.” Academy of Management Journal ,Vol. 27, pp 765-776
53. Warner, J. B., R. L. Watts, and K. H. Wruck(1988), “Stock Prices and Top Management Changes,” Journal of Financial Economics 20, p.461-492。
54. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Theory of Accounting. Prentice- Hall, Inc.
55. Weisbach, M. S. (1988), “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover,”Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 20, pp.431-460.
56. WUNSCH, A.(1992), “The Effect of Executive Compensation Policy On Long-Term Investment Expenditures of Large Corporations.” U.M.I..
57. Zajac E.J (1990), “ CEO selection ,succession, compensation and firm performance: a theoretical integration and empirical analysis.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, pp217-230.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
90357002
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 姜堯民zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chiang, Yao-mingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳彥霓zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Yen-nien_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳彥霓zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Yen-nien_US
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 19:09:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 19:09:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 19:09:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0090357002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34031-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90357002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 為釐清經理人異動對公司日常營運決策及績效之影響及資訊內涵，本研究透過分析國內近五年來上市櫃公司樣本後發現，大多數發生經理人異動之公司多為一次且自願性之異動，而不是經常性之活動，此為一家公司經營權輪替之正常行為。至於其他發生非經常性異動之公司則多在5年內有高於2次以上之異動行為，此和該類公司經營績效不佳及集團內部有爭權行為有很大之關係。關於經理人異動事件宣告效果方面，本研究實證結果顯示，無論是何種異動原因，市場似乎皆呈現負向反應，且以非自願性異動事件負向反應程度為大。

至於經理人異動對公司投資及融資比例之影響方面，本實證結果顯示，不同之異動原因對公司投資、融資比例之影響亦不同。以自願性異動事件來說，事件發生前之固定資產成長率呈現遞增的現象，顯示經理人異動前其投資決策普遍較同業為積極，而事件發生後卻轉而成為較同業保守，顯示新上任者可能因為經驗之不足而不敢採行太積極的策略，而其負債比例在事件發生前逐年遞減，發生後則呈逐年遞增的現象。至於非自願性異動事件，本研究發現其在事件發生前即開始採行較保守的投資策略，推論可能和此類公司基本面較差，或是經理人進行資產誤置之行為所導致，異動後新繼任者之投資轉趨積極；而其於事件發生前負債比例增加，發生後則呈現減少的現象。

至於經理人異動後公司之績效情況，本研究結果顯示無論是會計指標或是市場績效指標，自願性異動樣本之結果在事件發生後公司經營績效皆較之前為差，和市場對事件宣告之反應相符合；但以非自願性異動樣本來說，事件發生後公司經營績效之指標皆較之前為佳，顯示當初事件發生時市場之反應似乎太過悲觀，但這部分的結果可能存在有存在偏誤(survival bias)之問題。

上述的實證結果使得台灣公司經理人異動和市場宣告反應、經營決策及績效首次獲得連結，對投資人在未來從事投資時可作為參考依據。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In order to understand the information content of CEO turnover to corporate operating decision and performance, from analyzing the listing companies between 1997-2002 in TW, this research found that the most CEO turnover is once and voluntary activity, this is normal in the daily operation. As for the other involuntary turnover activity, which often happened in the company with bad performance or takeover. As for the announcement effect about CEO turnover, the article found that no matter what reasons, the effect is negative, and more significant in involuntary turnover.

About the CEO turnover influence on corporate investing and financing decision, this article shows that different turnover reason would result in different decision. Take the companies with voluntary turnover for instance, the fixed asset growth rate grew before turnover but fell afterward. I assume that’s because new CEO takes more conservative investment decision than original one. And the leverage rate in this kind of companies falls before the event but grows afterward. As for the companies with involuntary turnover, this article found that the original CEO took more conservative investment decision than new CEO, this might be because of the worse fundamental situation in this kind of companies or the asset misallocation of the original CEO. And the leverage rate of involuntary turnover grows before the event but falls afterward.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻探討與文獻回顧 6
第一節 經理人與委託人間所可能存在的代理問題 6
第二節 經理人異動發生的原因 10
第三節 經理人投資及財務決策因子 12
第四節 公司績效指標 14
第五節 經理人異動與公司經營績效的關係 17
第六節 股權結構與公司價值之關係 19
第三章 研究設計 24
第一節 研究對象與範圍 24
第二節 研究變數與定義 26
第三節 研究假說 30
第四節 研究方法與模型 32
第四章 實證分析與研究發現 38
第一節 經理人異動之敘述統計結果 38
第二節 經理人異動對股東財富之影響分析 43
第三節 經理人異動前後投資及融資決策比較 53
第四節 經理人異動前後公司績效比較 59
第五節 影響事件宣告結果之原因分析 63
第五章 結論與建議 69
第一節 研究發現與結論 69
第二節 對股東之建議 73
第三節 對後續研究者之建議 74
參考文獻 75
一、中文部份 75
二、英文部份 77		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 84186 bytes-
dc.format.extent 108193 bytes-
dc.format.extent 120861 bytes-
dc.format.extent 116965 bytes-
dc.format.extent 137098 bytes-
dc.format.extent 361858 bytes-
dc.format.extent 278035 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1226353 bytes-
dc.format.extent 175581 bytes-
dc.format.extent 29569 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經理人異動zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 市場宣告效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財務績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 投資決策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 融資決策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CEO turnoveren_US
dc.title (題名) 經理人異動對公司策略及績效影響之資訊意涵zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 王惠昕(2001)，「代理問題對公司股權結構與財務決策之影響」，碩士論文，國立中正大學財務金融研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 呂彥慧（1999），「股權結構、監督機制、轉投資、交叉持股與公司經營績效之關係—以台灣新上市公司為例」，國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. 李柏慶 （2002），「股東對於高階主管異動之反應」，碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. 李淑玲 (2001)，「重要管理階層更迭之股東財富效果」，碩士論文，國立中正大學財務金融研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. 吳政穎（2000），「我國上市公司股權集中度、薪酬設計與公司經營績效關係之研究」，博士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. 吳啟銘（2000），「企業評價」，智勝出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. 林佳陽 (2001)，「我國上市公司高階主管異動宣告對股價報酬的影響」，碩士論文，中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. 林明謙（2001），「股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究」，私立輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. 周賓凰、蔡坤芳（1997），「台灣股市日資料特性與事件研究法」，證券市場發展季刊，第九卷，第二期，p1-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. 張家智 (2001)，「相對績效評量與總經理離職、薪酬之實證研究-考慮產業競爭程度」，碩士論文，國立中正大學會計學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. 張明峰 (1990) ，「股權結構對公司績效影響之研究」，碩士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. 陳建宏 (2001)，「公司經理人異動對股東財富與公司經營績效影響之研究」，碩士論文，朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. 曾玉潔（2000），「我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實証研究」，碩士論文，國立中正大學會計學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. 彭雅惠（1996），「臺灣上市公司財務決策代理理論的驗證」，國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. 葉銀華、邱顯比，「資本結構、股權結構和公司價值關聯性之實證研究：代理成本理論」，臺大管理論叢，民國85年8月，頁57-90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. 楊善富 (2000)，「台灣上市公司高階主管持股比例、績效與離職關係之實證研究」，碩士論文， 國立中正大學會計學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. 蔣芳育(1996)，「大型企業領導者更迭之研究-台灣上市公司十年經驗分析」，未出版碩士論文，中正大學企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. 蔡坤方 (1996)，「事件研究法論-以台灣股票市場日資料為例」，碩士論文，國立中央大學財務管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. 賴汝鑑(1984)，「我國民營企業高階層主管變動對公司價值的影響」，未出版碩士論文，東海大學企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. 戴淵明(1985)，「公司控制型態與其經營績效關係之研究--臺灣地區上市公司之實證分析」，國立中興大學企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. 顧啟聖（2001），「股權結構、高階主管薪酬與經營效率之研究--本國壽險公司之實證」，私立逢甲大學保險學系研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. 歐怡岑 （2001），「高階主管獎酬、公司投資與公司價值關係之研究—以臺灣上市公司為例」，國立中正大學會計學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Agrawal, A, and N. J. Nagarajan (1990) , " Corporate Capital Structure, Agency Costs, and Ownership Control: The Case of All-Equity Firms", Journal of Finance 45,pp.1325-1331.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Allen, M. P., S. K. Panian, and R. E. Lotz(1979), “Managerial Successionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Organization Performance：A Recalcitrant Problem Revisited,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Administrative Science Quarterly 24, p.167-180。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Antle, R., and A. Smith. (1986). An Empirical Investigation of The Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executive. Journal of Accounting Research 24 : 1-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Beatty, R.P., and E. J. Zajac (1987), “CEO Change and Firm Performance in Large Corporations：Succession Effects and Manager Effects,” Strategic Management Journal , Vol.8, pp.305-317.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Beaver, W. H., R. Clarke, and K. F. Wright. 1979. The Association Between Unsystematic Security Returns and The Magnitude of Earnings Forecast Errors. Journal of Accounting Research 17 : 316-340.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Benston, G.(1985). The Self-Serving Management Hypothesis: Some Evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 : 67-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Berle, A., and Means (1932), “The Modern Corporate and Private Property：A Reappraisal/Comment/Hessen’s “Reappraisal”,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp. 273-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Bonnier, Karl-Adam, and R. F. Bruner (1989), “An Analysis of Stock Price Reaction to Management Change in Distressed Firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11, pp.95-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Brown, M. C.(1982), “Administrative Succession and Organizationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Performance：The Succession Effect,” Administrative Science Quarterly 27, p.1-16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Byrd, Parrino, Pritsch（1998）, Stockholder-manager conflicts and firm value, Financial Analyst Journal, AIMR.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Charles J Hadlock, Gerald B Lumer(1997), Compensation, turnover, and top management incentives: Historical evidence, The Journal of Business, Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. CHAN, S. H.; J. D. MARTIN; AND J. W. KENSINGER. ( 1990), "Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value. " Journal of Financial Economics 26: 255-276.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Chen, Carl R. and Thomas L. Steiner (1999) , "Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflicts: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividend Policy", Financial Review 34, pp.119-136.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Coughlan, A., and R. Schmidt (1985), “Executive compensation, management turnover and firm performance: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics , Vol.7, pp.43-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Crutchley, E. C. and R. S. Hansen (1989), "A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage and Corporate Dividends", Financial Management 18, pp.36-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Defond, M. L., and C. W. Park. (1999), “The Effect of Competition on CEO Turnover.” Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol.27, pp.35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Denis, D. J., and D. K. Denis(1995), “Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals,” The Journal of Finance 50, p.1029-1058.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Eitzen and Yetman, N.R (1972), “Managerial Change ,longevity ,and organizational effectiveness ,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp110-116zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. FAMA, E. F. (1980), “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Friedman, S. D., and H. Singh(1989), “CEO Succession and Stockholder Reaction：The Influence of Organizational Context and Event Content , ”Academy of Management Journal , Vol.32, pp.718-744.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Furtado, E. P.H., and M. S. Rozeff (1987), “The Wealth Effects of Company Initiated Management Changes,” Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.18, pp.147-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. Gamson, W. A., and N. A. Scotch(1964), “Scapegoating in Baseball,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Journal of Sociology 70, p.69-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. Gephart, R.P.(1978) ,” Status Degradation and Organization succession ”American Journal of Sociology ,Vol. 75, pp21-31zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. Gilson, S. (1989). Management Turnover And Financial Distress. Journal of Financial Economics 25 : 241-262.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. Gjesdal, F. (1981). Accounting for Stewardship. Journal of Accounting Research 19: 208-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. Grusky, O.(1963), “Managerial Succession and Organizational Effectivenesszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ,” American Journal of Sociology 69, p.21-30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. Guest, R. H.(1962), “Managerial Succession in Complex Organizations,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Journal of Sociology 68, p.47-54。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. Harrison, R.J., Torres, D.L., and Kukalis, S. (1988) , “The changing of the guard： turnover and structural change in the top management positions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, pp. 211-232.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. Hannan and Dreeman (1977), “The population ecology of organizations”, American Journal of Sociology ,Vol.82 ,pp 929-964.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. Healy, P. M. (1985). “The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decision.“ Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 : 85-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31. Helmich, D.L (1974).” Organization growth and succession patterns” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17 , pp. 771-775zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. , "The Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics 3, 1976, pp.5-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33. Kesner, I. F., and D. R. Dalton (1994), “Top Management Turnover and CEO Succession：An Investigation of The Effects on Performance,” Journal of Management Studies , Vol.31, pp.701-713.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34. LARCKER, D. F. (1983), “The Association Between Performance Plan Adoption and Corporate Capital Investment.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 3-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35. Lubatkin, M. H., K. H. Chung, R. C. Rogers, and J. E. Owers (1989), “Stockholder Reactions to CEO Changes in Large Corporations,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp.47-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36. Mahajan, A., and S. Lummer (1993), “Shareholder Wealth Effects of Management Changes,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting , Vol.20, p.393-410.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37. Martin, Kenneth J. and John J. McConnell (1991), “Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeover, and Management Turnover,” Journal of Finance, Vol.46, No.2, pp.671-678.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38. MCCONNELLl, J. J. (1995), AND H. SERVAES. “Equity Ownership and the Two Faces of Debt.” Journal of Financial Economics 39: 137-151.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39. MORCK, R.; A. SHLEIFER; AND R. W. VISHNY. (1988), “Management Ownership and Market Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics 20): 293-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40. MURPHY, K. J.(1985) “Corporate Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover.” Working Paper, Harvard University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41. Murphy, K. J., and J. L. Zimmerman (1993), “Financial Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover,” Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol.16, pp.273-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42. Osborn, R., L. Jauch, T. Martin, and W. Glueck (1981), “The event of CEO succession, performance, and environmental conditions,”Academy of Management Journal , Vol.24, pp.183-191.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43. O’Byrne, S. F. (1990). Shareholder Return and Management Performance. Compensation and Benefits Review 22 : 30-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44. Titman, S. and R. Wessels, "The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice", Journal of Finance 43, 1988,pp.1-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45. Torwon,D. (1961) “ Executive succession in small companies” Administrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 6 ,pp228-239zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46. Price, K.L. (1975), “The measurement of turnover,” Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 33-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47. Puffer, S., and J. B. Weintrop.(1991). Corporate Performance and CEO Turnover: The Role of Performance Expectations. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 : 1- 19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48. Rappaport, A. 1986. Creating Shareholder Value : The New Standard for Business Performance. New York : Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 49. Reinganum, M. R. (1985), “The Effect of Executive Succession on Stockholder Wealth,”Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol.30, pp.46-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 50. Salancik and Pfeffer (1977), “ Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in US corporations” Academy of management Journal ,Vol.23 , pp653-664.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51. Sloan, R. G. (1993).”Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. “ Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 : 55-100zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 52. Smith, Carson, and Alexander, R.A (1984). “ Leadership : It can make a difference.” Academy of Management Journal ,Vol. 27, pp 765-776zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 53. Warner, J. B., R. L. Watts, and K. H. Wruck(1988), “Stock Prices and Top Management Changes,” Journal of Financial Economics 20, p.461-492。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 54. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Theory of Accounting. Prentice- Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 55. Weisbach, M. S. (1988), “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover,”Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 20, pp.431-460.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 56. WUNSCH, A.(1992), “The Effect of Executive Compensation Policy On Long-Term Investment Expenditures of Large Corporations.” U.M.I..zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 57. Zajac E.J (1990), “ CEO selection ,succession, compensation and firm performance: a theoretical integration and empirical analysis.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, pp217-230.zh_TW