學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 台灣未上市櫃銀行違約風險預測-以KMV公司之PFM模型為例
作者 尹立慶
貢獻者 蔡政憲
尹立慶
關鍵詞 PFM
日期 2005
上傳時間 2009-09-18
摘要 信用風險長久以來是學術和實務研究的重要議題,而以往的研究常常著重在違約機率的計算與探討;而另一方面,在信評公司的系統性的評估下,信用評等的發佈適時地提供了提供了利害關係人另一種信用風險的客觀參考指標。
本文採用Moodys所研發的PFM模型(Private Firm Model,針對未上市櫃公司的KMV模型)進行台灣金融產業中未上市櫃銀行的研究,計算各被研究公司的違約距離,再加以分組比較,計算出依此模型所求出之內部信用評等分級。
由於信用評等公司所採用的評等方式多是利用已發生的財務資訊以資產品質、獲利能力、通路、風險管理能力和資本結構進行,以訪談的方式進行,其中人為主觀的成分往往無法客觀的屏除。然若可以採用股價所隱含的資訊進行分析,理論上應可以反應一家公司所有財務和非財務的資訊。本研究即試圖找出未上市櫃公司之應有股價,用以進行風險的分析研究,此即為PFM模型之精神。
最後,在有效建立出台灣未上市櫃銀行之信用分佈後,本文進一部將模型所預測出的信用評等與中華信評之既有信評歷史交叉分析以檢視兩模型之關係,研究結果顯示,加入金控的銀行具有與信評較為一致的信用評等,未加入金控銀行之信用評等則俱較明顯的不同。
Credit risk has been long interested by scholars and practitioners in ways of different measures, especially probability of default; on the other hand, credit rating agencies such as S&P, Moodys, and Fitch also provide rating reports in a timing manner for interested parties for diverse purposes.
This paper adopted Moodys’ PFM (Private Firm Model, based on KMV model for listed corporation) for exploring Taiwan’s unlisted banks’ distance to default (DD) in a bid to create our internal rating model for each bank’s credit profile. Basically, rating agencies utilize historical financial and non-financial information in terms of asset quality, profitability, risk management, and capitalization as well by in-depth interviews to assess companies’ credit, however, exclusion of fully subjective appraisers’ opinions is questioned. In contrast, stock price should, theoretically, contain sophisticated information both financially and non-financially for credit research, which is the spirit of PFM’s credit assessment.
In the final session, this paper will compare credit ratings generated from internal rating model with the ratings assigned by Taiwan Ratings’ to study the correlation between these two models. It concludes that FHC-based banks have similar credit ratings as Taiwan Ratings’ but not non-FHC-based ones.
參考文獻 中文
許士偉,利用PFM衡量我國未上市保險公司之違約風險,政治大學風險管理與保險研究所論文,民94年6月
黃仁德、陳淑郁,信用風險衡量,台灣金融財務季刊,第五輯,第三期,民93年9月,77-111。
陳侑宣,商業銀行如何使用信用風險值檢視授信政策,中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民93年6月
周培如,銀行危機預警指標-KMV信用風險模型與財務指標之應用,政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文,民92年6月
王懷德,KMV模型於國內未上市、未上櫃之公開發行公司之研究,東吳大學會計研究所論文,民92年6月。
陳思翰,商業銀行如何利用Logit及KMV模型檢視授信政策,中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民92年6月
林妙宜,公司信用風險之衡量,政治大學金融研究所碩士論文,民91年6月。
楊士昌,壽險業信用評等模式之研究-美國壽險公司之實證分析,政治大學風險管理與保險研究所論文,民91年6月
施佳華,產險業信用評等模式之研究-美國產險公司之實證分析,政治大學風險管理與保險研究所論文,民90年7月
英文
1. Cummins J. David, Martin F. G.race, and Richard D. Phillips., “Regulatory Solvency Prediction in Property-Liability Insurance: Risk-Based Capital, Audit Ratios, and Cash Flow Simulation”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol.. 66, No. 3(Sep., 1999), 417-458
2. Douglas W. Dwyer, 2005, “Examples of Overfitting Encountered When Building Private Firm Default Prediction Models”, MKMV White Paper.
3. Eric F., Andrew B. and Lea V. Carty, 2000,“RiskcalcTM For Private Companies,” KMV corporation.
4. Jeffrey Bohn, Navneet Arora, and Irina Korablev, 2005, “Power and Level Validation of the EDF™ Credit Measure in the U.S. Market,” MKMV White Paper.
5. Matthew Kurbat and Irina Korablew, 2002, “Methodology for Testing the Level of the EDF Credit Measure,” KMV White Paper.
6. Navneet Arora, Jeffrey R. Bohn, Fanlin Zhu, 2005, “Reduced Form vs. Structural Models of Credit Risk: A Case Study of Three Models,” MKMV White Paper.
7. Oldrich A. Vasicek,1999, “Credit Valuation,” KMV corporation.
8. Peter Crosbie and Jeff Bohn., 2003, “Modeling Default Risk,” KMV corporation.
9. Robert C. Merton, 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance, 29, 449-70.
10. Roger M. Stein., 2005, “The Relationship Between Default Prediction and Lending Profits: Integrating ROC Analysis and Loan Pricing”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 29, pp1213-1236.
11. Roger M. Stein, Ahmet E. Kocagil, Jeff Bohn and Jalal. Akhavein, 2003, “Systematic And Idiosyncratic Risk In Middle-Market Default Prediction: A Study Of The Performance Of The RiskCale And PFM Model,” KMV corporation.
12. Saunders Anthony and Cornett M. Millon, 2003, Financial Institutions Management : A Risk Management Approach, 5th edition, Taipei:McGraw-Hill.
13. Stefan Blochwitz, Thilo Liebig and Mikael Nyberg, 2000, “Benchmarking Deutsche Bundesbank’s Default Risk Model, the KMV Private Firm Model and Common Financial Ratios for German Corporations,” KMV corporation.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
風險管理與保險研究所
92358026
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923580261
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡政憲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 尹立慶zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 尹立慶zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-18-
dc.date.available 2009-09-18-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2009-09-18-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0923580261en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34173-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 風險管理與保險研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92358026zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 信用風險長久以來是學術和實務研究的重要議題,而以往的研究常常著重在違約機率的計算與探討;而另一方面,在信評公司的系統性的評估下,信用評等的發佈適時地提供了提供了利害關係人另一種信用風險的客觀參考指標。
本文採用Moodys所研發的PFM模型(Private Firm Model,針對未上市櫃公司的KMV模型)進行台灣金融產業中未上市櫃銀行的研究,計算各被研究公司的違約距離,再加以分組比較,計算出依此模型所求出之內部信用評等分級。
由於信用評等公司所採用的評等方式多是利用已發生的財務資訊以資產品質、獲利能力、通路、風險管理能力和資本結構進行,以訪談的方式進行,其中人為主觀的成分往往無法客觀的屏除。然若可以採用股價所隱含的資訊進行分析,理論上應可以反應一家公司所有財務和非財務的資訊。本研究即試圖找出未上市櫃公司之應有股價,用以進行風險的分析研究,此即為PFM模型之精神。
最後,在有效建立出台灣未上市櫃銀行之信用分佈後,本文進一部將模型所預測出的信用評等與中華信評之既有信評歷史交叉分析以檢視兩模型之關係,研究結果顯示,加入金控的銀行具有與信評較為一致的信用評等,未加入金控銀行之信用評等則俱較明顯的不同。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Credit risk has been long interested by scholars and practitioners in ways of different measures, especially probability of default; on the other hand, credit rating agencies such as S&P, Moodys, and Fitch also provide rating reports in a timing manner for interested parties for diverse purposes.
This paper adopted Moodys’ PFM (Private Firm Model, based on KMV model for listed corporation) for exploring Taiwan’s unlisted banks’ distance to default (DD) in a bid to create our internal rating model for each bank’s credit profile. Basically, rating agencies utilize historical financial and non-financial information in terms of asset quality, profitability, risk management, and capitalization as well by in-depth interviews to assess companies’ credit, however, exclusion of fully subjective appraisers’ opinions is questioned. In contrast, stock price should, theoretically, contain sophisticated information both financially and non-financially for credit research, which is the spirit of PFM’s credit assessment.
In the final session, this paper will compare credit ratings generated from internal rating model with the ratings assigned by Taiwan Ratings’ to study the correlation between these two models. It concludes that FHC-based banks have similar credit ratings as Taiwan Ratings’ but not non-FHC-based ones.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 5
第一節 前言 5
第二節 研究流程 8
第二章 研究方法 9
第一節 KMV Credit Monitor Model 9
第二節 Private Firm Model (PFM) 11
第三節 違約距離與預期違約機率的估算: 13
第三章 實証結果 14
第一節 樣本選取 14
第二節 上市公司之實證結果 17
第三節 PFM實証結果 19
第四節PFM模型以台灣銀行業為主之比較 25
第四章 結論與建議 30
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 62745 bytes-
dc.format.extent 81712 bytes-
dc.format.extent 66104 bytes-
dc.format.extent 29626 bytes-
dc.format.extent 49171 bytes-
dc.format.extent 195217 bytes-
dc.format.extent 110861 bytes-
dc.format.extent 213785 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80936 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67758 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923580261en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) PFMen_US
dc.title (題名) 台灣未上市櫃銀行違約風險預測-以KMV公司之PFM模型為例zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許士偉,利用PFM衡量我國未上市保險公司之違約風險,政治大學風險管理與保險研究所論文,民94年6月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃仁德、陳淑郁,信用風險衡量,台灣金融財務季刊,第五輯,第三期,民93年9月,77-111。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳侑宣,商業銀行如何使用信用風險值檢視授信政策,中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民93年6月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周培如,銀行危機預警指標-KMV信用風險模型與財務指標之應用,政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文,民92年6月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王懷德,KMV模型於國內未上市、未上櫃之公開發行公司之研究,東吳大學會計研究所論文,民92年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳思翰,商業銀行如何利用Logit及KMV模型檢視授信政策,中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民92年6月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林妙宜,公司信用風險之衡量,政治大學金融研究所碩士論文,民91年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊士昌,壽險業信用評等模式之研究-美國壽險公司之實證分析,政治大學風險管理與保險研究所論文,民91年6月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 施佳華,產險業信用評等模式之研究-美國產險公司之實證分析,政治大學風險管理與保險研究所論文,民90年7月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Cummins J. David, Martin F. G.race, and Richard D. Phillips., “Regulatory Solvency Prediction in Property-Liability Insurance: Risk-Based Capital, Audit Ratios, and Cash Flow Simulation”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol.. 66, No. 3(Sep., 1999), 417-458zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Douglas W. Dwyer, 2005, “Examples of Overfitting Encountered When Building Private Firm Default Prediction Models”, MKMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Eric F., Andrew B. and Lea V. Carty, 2000,“RiskcalcTM For Private Companies,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Jeffrey Bohn, Navneet Arora, and Irina Korablev, 2005, “Power and Level Validation of the EDF™ Credit Measure in the U.S. Market,” MKMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Matthew Kurbat and Irina Korablew, 2002, “Methodology for Testing the Level of the EDF Credit Measure,” KMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Navneet Arora, Jeffrey R. Bohn, Fanlin Zhu, 2005, “Reduced Form vs. Structural Models of Credit Risk: A Case Study of Three Models,” MKMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Oldrich A. Vasicek,1999, “Credit Valuation,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Peter Crosbie and Jeff Bohn., 2003, “Modeling Default Risk,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Robert C. Merton, 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance, 29, 449-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Roger M. Stein., 2005, “The Relationship Between Default Prediction and Lending Profits: Integrating ROC Analysis and Loan Pricing”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 29, pp1213-1236.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Roger M. Stein, Ahmet E. Kocagil, Jeff Bohn and Jalal. Akhavein, 2003, “Systematic And Idiosyncratic Risk In Middle-Market Default Prediction: A Study Of The Performance Of The RiskCale And PFM Model,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Saunders Anthony and Cornett M. Millon, 2003, Financial Institutions Management : A Risk Management Approach, 5th edition, Taipei:McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Stefan Blochwitz, Thilo Liebig and Mikael Nyberg, 2000, “Benchmarking Deutsche Bundesbank’s Default Risk Model, the KMV Private Firm Model and Common Financial Ratios for German Corporations,” KMV corporation.zh_TW