學術產出-學位論文

題名 會計師執行財務報表查核時偵出舞弊責任的認知研究
作者 廖基宏
Liao,Chi-Hung.
貢獻者 馬秀如
廖基宏
Liao,Chi-Hung.
關鍵詞 透鏡模型
舞弊
會計師責任
fraud
lens model
日期 2006
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 09:02:40 (UTC+8)
摘要 每當重大舞弊案件發生時,社會大眾常將矛頭指向負責財務報表查核的會計師,認為會計師並沒有負起他(她)應負的責任,在國際上,如安隆案(Enron)、世界通訊(Worldcom)的隱瞞虧損、線上時代華納(AOL Time Warner)的虛報廣告營收等等事件皆是如此;在我國,也有赫赫有名的博達等案。
會計師的專業與超然獨立的立場,使得簽證功能得到資訊使用者的信任,對投資大眾而言,亦提供一層重要的保障。然而,會計師所提供之合理確信並非絕對之保證,一旦因為某些無法控制之因素造成企業失敗,相關利害關係人無可避免地會將矛頭指向會計師,因此跟隨而來的訴訟將對會計師造成相當大的損失,而利害關係人與會計師的認知差距即為造成訴訟的關鍵因素。
本研究先探討會計師查核舞弊的責任為何?再進一步研究財務報表使用者與會計師間,對於會計師執行財務報表查核時,偵測舞弊責任的認知,同時研究不同人之間,是否存有認知差距。
本研究採透鏡模型觀念,針對學過及未學過審計學的人進行問卷調查,研究結果發現:受試者皆認為會計師負有偵測管理舞弊的責任,財務報表使用者與會計師之間的認知,雖然使用的線索相同,但線索使用的程度仍有不同。


關鍵字:舞弊、會計師責任、透鏡模型
Every time when there is serious fraud, the public will accuse the audit accountant for not taking the responsibility he/she should take. Internationally, there are Enron and Worldcom concealed their loses, AOL Time Warner overstated their commercial revenues. In Taiwan, there are also cases like procomp.
Due to the profession and independence of accountants, the public trusts the opinion they issued toward the financial statements. However, the assurance that the audit accountant provides is highly but not absolute guarantee. Once there is some incontrollable factors lead to business failure, the interested party will blame the audit accountants. Therefore, the follow-up lawsuit will cause a lot loses to the accountant. The gap between interested party and accountant will be the key point to the lawsuit.
The study tries to analyze the viewpoints of the interested party and accountants toward the accountant duty of inspecting fraud when auditing financial statements. The study uses questionnaire, taking national university graduated and college students as objects, and discuss by the framework of lens model.
The study concluded that all the interviewee think that the audit accountant has the responsibility to examine the fraud. As to the perception of interested party and accountants, on the other hand, though the interest party and accountant own the same clues, they use them to different extent.
參考文獻 中文部分
杜榮瑞,1998,行為會計研究之回顧:問題與典範,中山管理評論,第六卷第二期:293-330。
______、蘇裕惠,1993,審計上的政策捕捉研究-透視模型之應用(上),會計研究月刊,第98期:106-110。
______、______,1993,審計上的政策捕捉研究-透視模型之應用(中),會計研究月刊,第99期:100-104。
______、______,1994,審計上的政策捕捉研究-透視模型之應用(下),會計研究月刊,第100期:125-128。
林美花,1975,會計師法律責任之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
俞洪昭,1988,重要性判斷之研究-透視模型的應用,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
馬秀如,1996a,員工舞弊與管理舞弊釋疑,會計研究月刊,第126期:104-111。
______,1996b,非法事項、錯誤及舞弊,會計研究月刊,第129期:112-123。
高晶萍,1995,我國審計功能認知差距之實證研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
許伯彥,2002,財務報表舞弊風險評量模式研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
黃柄勳,2003,會計師執行財務報表查核對利害關係人所負民事責任之研究,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。
陳兆宏,1987,變異數分析下的統計值- 值之介紹,會計評論第二十二期:120-145。
陳兆宏,1988,審計人員內部控制判斷行為之研究-透視模型之運用,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
陳秋芳,1989,企業倒閉與會計師責任,工商雜誌,第33卷第8期:28-29。
______,1998,公司管理舞弊會計師豈應連坐同罪,會計研究月刊,第147期:7-8。
陳韻年,1989,查核人員面臨之法律責任及其因應之道,會計評論,第24期:47-58。
蔡信夫、馮拙人,審計學概念和應用第四版,新陸書局,2004。
鄭惠之,2004a,財務報表的管理責任,會計研究月刊,第220期:31-41。
______,2004b,投資人要獲得真實的正義,會計研究月刊,第220期:42-46。
______,2004c,財務報表的審計責任,會計研究月刊,第220期:53-60。
簡駿貿, 2003,會計師法律責任對經理人舞弊與會計師查核努力水準之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
中華民國審計準則公報第十四號,舞弊與錯誤,財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。
中華民國審計準則公報第四十三號,會計師對財務報表考量舞弊之責任,財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。
中華民國會計師法
中華民國民法總則
中華民國證券交易法
英文部分
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1988. Statement of Auditing Standard No.53: The Auditor’s Responsibility to Detect and Report Errors and Irregularities. New York, NY: AICPA.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1988. Statement of Auditing Standard No.54: Illegal Acts by Clints. New York, NY: AICPA.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1997. Statement of Auditing Standard No.82: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement. New York, NY: AICPA.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 2003. Statement of Auditing Standard No.99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement. New
York, NY: AICPA.
Andrew, H. B., J. E. Brown, R. Fleming, and W. J. Read. 1998. The CPA as fraud-buster. Journal of Accountancy 185: 69-74.
Arrington, C. E., C. D. Bailey, and W. S. Hopwood. 1985. An attribution analysis of responsibility assessment for audit performance. Journal of Accounting Research 23: 1-20.
Ashton, R. H. 1974. An experimental study of internal control judgment. Accounting Research 12: 143-157.
Barnett, A., R. Fleming., and J. W. Read. 1998. The CPA as fraud-buster. Journal of Accountancy 185: 69-74.
Bonner, S. E., V. Z. Palmrose, and. M. S. Young. 1998. Fraud type and auditor litigation: An analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases. The Accounting Review 73: 503-533.
David, G. B. 2004. The fight against fraud. The Internal Auditor 61: 34-39.
Epstein, M. J., and A. M. Geiger. 1994. Investor veiws of audit assurance: Recent evidence of the expectation gap. Journal of Accountancy 177: 60-65.
Fadzly, M. N., and Zauwiyah A. 2004 Audit expectation gap: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal: 897.
Gramling, A. A., J. W. Schatzberg, and W. A. Wallace. 1996. The role of undergraduate auditing coursework in reducing the expectations gap
Accounting Education. 11:131-133.
Hussain, I. 2003. Auditing expectations gap: A possible solution. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 3: 67-87.
Joni, J Y. 1997. Defining auditors` responsibilities. The Accounting Historians Journal 24: 25-64.
Joyce, E. J. and R. Libby. 1982. Behavioral studies of audit decision making. Journal of Accounting Literature 1(spring): 103-123.
Kimberly, F., E. L. D. Jordan, and S. K. James. 2001. The expectation gap: Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students. Managerial Auditing Journal 16: 145-150.
Libby, R., and B. L. Lewis. 1982. Human information processing research in accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society 7: 231-285.
Lowe, D. J. and P. Kurt. 1993. Expectations of the audit function. The CPA Journal 63: 58-61.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
93353009
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353009
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 馬秀如zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 廖基宏zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Liao,Chi-Hung.en_US
dc.creator (作者) 廖基宏zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Liao,Chi-Hung.en_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 09:02:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 09:02:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 09:02:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0093353009en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34220-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93353009zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 每當重大舞弊案件發生時,社會大眾常將矛頭指向負責財務報表查核的會計師,認為會計師並沒有負起他(她)應負的責任,在國際上,如安隆案(Enron)、世界通訊(Worldcom)的隱瞞虧損、線上時代華納(AOL Time Warner)的虛報廣告營收等等事件皆是如此;在我國,也有赫赫有名的博達等案。
會計師的專業與超然獨立的立場,使得簽證功能得到資訊使用者的信任,對投資大眾而言,亦提供一層重要的保障。然而,會計師所提供之合理確信並非絕對之保證,一旦因為某些無法控制之因素造成企業失敗,相關利害關係人無可避免地會將矛頭指向會計師,因此跟隨而來的訴訟將對會計師造成相當大的損失,而利害關係人與會計師的認知差距即為造成訴訟的關鍵因素。
本研究先探討會計師查核舞弊的責任為何?再進一步研究財務報表使用者與會計師間,對於會計師執行財務報表查核時,偵測舞弊責任的認知,同時研究不同人之間,是否存有認知差距。
本研究採透鏡模型觀念,針對學過及未學過審計學的人進行問卷調查,研究結果發現:受試者皆認為會計師負有偵測管理舞弊的責任,財務報表使用者與會計師之間的認知,雖然使用的線索相同,但線索使用的程度仍有不同。


關鍵字:舞弊、會計師責任、透鏡模型
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Every time when there is serious fraud, the public will accuse the audit accountant for not taking the responsibility he/she should take. Internationally, there are Enron and Worldcom concealed their loses, AOL Time Warner overstated their commercial revenues. In Taiwan, there are also cases like procomp.
Due to the profession and independence of accountants, the public trusts the opinion they issued toward the financial statements. However, the assurance that the audit accountant provides is highly but not absolute guarantee. Once there is some incontrollable factors lead to business failure, the interested party will blame the audit accountants. Therefore, the follow-up lawsuit will cause a lot loses to the accountant. The gap between interested party and accountant will be the key point to the lawsuit.
The study tries to analyze the viewpoints of the interested party and accountants toward the accountant duty of inspecting fraud when auditing financial statements. The study uses questionnaire, taking national university graduated and college students as objects, and discuss by the framework of lens model.
The study concluded that all the interviewee think that the audit accountant has the responsibility to examine the fraud. As to the perception of interested party and accountants, on the other hand, though the interest party and accountant own the same clues, they use them to different extent.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論.............. 1
第一節 研究動機.......... 1
第二節 研究問題.......... 5
第三節 研究流程.......... 6
第四節 論文架構.......... 7
第二章 文獻探討.......... 8
第一節 舞弊的本質.........8
第二節 會計師法律責任.......... 12
第三節 會計師責任與相關認知之研究.......... 16
第三章 研究方法.......... 25
第一節 研究假說.......... 25
第二節 研究個案設計.......... 27
第三節 變項及操作性定義.......... 31
第四節 受試者及施測程序.......... 33
第五節 統計方法.......... 34
第四章 實證結果與討論.......... 35
第一節 判斷政策.......... 35
第二節 不同團體對判斷政策的影響.......... 43
第五章 結論與建議.......... 47
第一節 結論.......... 47
第二節 研究限制.......... 49
第三節 建議.......... 50
參考文獻.......... 51
附錄一透鏡模型.......... 54
附錄二問卷.......... 61
附錄三 主要效果與交互作用效果.......... 68
附錄四 判斷品質.......... 72

表目錄
表2-1 相關文獻整理.......... 22
表3-1 預試的問卷主要內容.......... 28
表3-2 正式版問卷.......... 30
表3-3 受試者人數統計表.......... 33
表4-1 受試者使用線索達顯著水準(α=0.05)個數之次數分配....... 36
表4-2 各線索主要效果及交互作用達顯著水準次數.......... 37
表4-3 受試者對各線索重視程度排名次數表.......... 38
表4-4 線索重要程度排名表.......... 39
表4-5 主要效果顯著個數次數分配及相關統計值.......... 40
表4-6 交互作用效果顯著個數次數分配及相關統計值.......... 41
表4-7 不同團體對資訊使用量的影響.......... 43
表4-8 各組線索使用程度彙總(標準化後w2值).......... 44
表4-9 不同團體對資訊使用方式的影響.......... 45

圖目錄
圖1.1 研究流程.......... 6
圖2.1 舞弊三角形圖.......... 10
圖4.1 各線索使用程度.......... 45
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 87383 bytes-
dc.format.extent 177856 bytes-
dc.format.extent 213506 bytes-
dc.format.extent 147910 bytes-
dc.format.extent 366960 bytes-
dc.format.extent 443985 bytes-
dc.format.extent 465960 bytes-
dc.format.extent 362181 bytes-
dc.format.extent 276827 bytes-
dc.format.extent 257694 bytes-
dc.format.extent 574334 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353009en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 透鏡模型zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 舞弊zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 會計師責任zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) frauden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) lens modelen_US
dc.title (題名) 會計師執行財務報表查核時偵出舞弊責任的認知研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 杜榮瑞,1998,行為會計研究之回顧:問題與典範,中山管理評論,第六卷第二期:293-330。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ______、蘇裕惠,1993,審計上的政策捕捉研究-透視模型之應用(上),會計研究月刊,第98期:106-110。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ______、______,1993,審計上的政策捕捉研究-透視模型之應用(中),會計研究月刊,第99期:100-104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ______、______,1994,審計上的政策捕捉研究-透視模型之應用(下),會計研究月刊,第100期:125-128。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林美花,1975,會計師法律責任之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞洪昭,1988,重要性判斷之研究-透視模型的應用,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬秀如,1996a,員工舞弊與管理舞弊釋疑,會計研究月刊,第126期:104-111。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ______,1996b,非法事項、錯誤及舞弊,會計研究月刊,第129期:112-123。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高晶萍,1995,我國審計功能認知差距之實證研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許伯彥,2002,財務報表舞弊風險評量模式研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃柄勳,2003,會計師執行財務報表查核對利害關係人所負民事責任之研究,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳兆宏,1987,變異數分析下的統計值- 值之介紹,會計評論第二十二期:120-145。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳兆宏,1988,審計人員內部控制判斷行為之研究-透視模型之運用,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳秋芳,1989,企業倒閉與會計師責任,工商雜誌,第33卷第8期:28-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ______,1998,公司管理舞弊會計師豈應連坐同罪,會計研究月刊,第147期:7-8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳韻年,1989,查核人員面臨之法律責任及其因應之道,會計評論,第24期:47-58。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡信夫、馮拙人,審計學概念和應用第四版,新陸書局,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭惠之,2004a,財務報表的管理責任,會計研究月刊,第220期:31-41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ______,2004b,投資人要獲得真實的正義,會計研究月刊,第220期:42-46。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ______,2004c,財務報表的審計責任,會計研究月刊,第220期:53-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 簡駿貿, 2003,會計師法律責任對經理人舞弊與會計師查核努力水準之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華民國審計準則公報第十四號,舞弊與錯誤,財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華民國審計準則公報第四十三號,會計師對財務報表考量舞弊之責任,財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華民國會計師法zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華民國民法總則zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華民國證券交易法zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1988. Statement of Auditing Standard No.53: The Auditor’s Responsibility to Detect and Report Errors and Irregularities. New York, NY: AICPA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1988. Statement of Auditing Standard No.54: Illegal Acts by Clints. New York, NY: AICPA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1997. Statement of Auditing Standard No.82: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement. New York, NY: AICPA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 2003. Statement of Auditing Standard No.99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) York, NY: AICPA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Andrew, H. B., J. E. Brown, R. Fleming, and W. J. Read. 1998. The CPA as fraud-buster. Journal of Accountancy 185: 69-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arrington, C. E., C. D. Bailey, and W. S. Hopwood. 1985. An attribution analysis of responsibility assessment for audit performance. Journal of Accounting Research 23: 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ashton, R. H. 1974. An experimental study of internal control judgment. Accounting Research 12: 143-157.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barnett, A., R. Fleming., and J. W. Read. 1998. The CPA as fraud-buster. Journal of Accountancy 185: 69-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bonner, S. E., V. Z. Palmrose, and. M. S. Young. 1998. Fraud type and auditor litigation: An analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases. The Accounting Review 73: 503-533.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) David, G. B. 2004. The fight against fraud. The Internal Auditor 61: 34-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Epstein, M. J., and A. M. Geiger. 1994. Investor veiws of audit assurance: Recent evidence of the expectation gap. Journal of Accountancy 177: 60-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fadzly, M. N., and Zauwiyah A. 2004 Audit expectation gap: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal: 897.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gramling, A. A., J. W. Schatzberg, and W. A. Wallace. 1996. The role of undergraduate auditing coursework in reducing the expectations gapzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Accounting Education. 11:131-133.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hussain, I. 2003. Auditing expectations gap: A possible solution. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 3: 67-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joni, J Y. 1997. Defining auditors` responsibilities. The Accounting Historians Journal 24: 25-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joyce, E. J. and R. Libby. 1982. Behavioral studies of audit decision making. Journal of Accounting Literature 1(spring): 103-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kimberly, F., E. L. D. Jordan, and S. K. James. 2001. The expectation gap: Perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students. Managerial Auditing Journal 16: 145-150.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Libby, R., and B. L. Lewis. 1982. Human information processing research in accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society 7: 231-285.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lowe, D. J. and P. Kurt. 1993. Expectations of the audit function. The CPA Journal 63: 58-61.zh_TW