Publications-Theses

題名 上市公司赴大陸投資對有效稅率影響之研究
作者 姚彥成
YAO, YEN-CHENG
貢獻者 陳明進
CHEN, MING-CHIN
姚彥成
YAO, YEN-CHENG
關鍵詞 有效稅率
大陸投資
間接投資
租稅負擔
Effective tax rates
Investment in Mainland China
Tax incentives
Tax burden
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 09:04:41 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以民國86年至民國93年上市公司財務報表資料探討我國企業赴中國大陸投資相關因素對有效稅率的影響。經本研究實證結果發現,有赴中國大陸投資的上市公司其有效稅率低於未赴中國大陸投資者;上市公司透過間接方式投資大陸地區之比重愈高者以及大陸地區投資獲利愈高者,由於有較多租稅規劃的空間,其有效稅率愈低。整體而言,在研究期間中,我國上市公司之平均有效稅率明顯低於營利事業所得稅名目最高邊際稅率;公司規模對有效稅率有負向影響,符合政治權力假說;本研究以長期負債、固定資產、存貨、研究發展費用做為投資理財決策的代理變數,皆與有效稅率呈現負相關,因此投資理財決策具有稅盾效果,可以降低公司稅負;另外,上市公司的獲利能力愈佳,有效稅率也愈高;證券以及土地交易所得等免稅所得較多的上市公司,有效稅率較低。上述分析顯示,上市公司赴中國大陸投資因素對於其租稅負擔有顯著影響,值得政府有關單位做為研擬相關法規的參考。
This study uses 1997-2004 financial statement data to explore the relationships between investment in Mainland China and the effective tax rates (ETRs) of listed companies in Taiwan. The empirical results show that investment in Mainland China of the listed companies has a negative and significant impact on the ETRs. This study finds that ETRs is negatively related with the scale of indirect investment and the level of profit of subsidiaries in Mainland China, perhaps due to a higher flexibility and feasibility of tax planning. Our results also reveal that average ETRs of listed companies are substantially lower than the statutory tax rate of the Income Tax Act of R.O.C. Small firms are more likely to have greater ETRs, supporting the political power hypothesis. Moreover, because of the tax shield effects, long-term debts, fixed assets, inventories, and R&D expenses, all as proxies for the financial decisions, have negative and significant impacts on the ETRs of listed companies. Finally, ceteris paribus, profitable companies tend to have higher ETRs, and tax-exempt capital gains from stock and land transactions also reduce the ETRs of listed companies. These findings indicate that investment in Mainland China by listed companies plays an important role in their tax burdens, and this fact should be taken into account by the government in devising future tax reforms.
參考文獻 王淑靜,2002,台商赴大陸投資安排及租稅規劃—兼以某上市公司為個案分析,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
邱正仁、吳志正與林怡盈,2001,台商大陸投資兩岸三地財務績效之實證研究,中國大陸研究,第44卷,第9期:41-55。
林世銘與楊朝旭,1994,上市公司營利事業所得稅負擔之研究,財稅研究,第26卷,第6期:34-52。
周添城、徐偉初與李新仁,1989a,不同企業規模、組織之賦稅分配研究,財政部賦稅改革委員會專題研究報告。
周添城、徐偉初、宋秀玲與李新仁,1989b,部門、產業間之賦稅分配研究,財政部賦稅改革委員會專題研究報告。
孫克難與劉涵泰,2001,邊際有效稅率、租稅減免與投資行為—臺灣的實證研究,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院。
陳明進,2002,營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究,會計評論,第34期:57-75。
陳明進,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響,管理評論,第22卷,第1期:127-151。
張天勳,1999,我國上市(櫃)公司有效稅率之實證研究—證券及土地交易免稅所得規定與集團企業因素之影響,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
楊雨霓,2005,會計方法選擇與公司有效稅率關聯性之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
劉孟俊,2004,大陸投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告,經濟部投資審議委員會委託中華經濟研究院編撰。
蔡素幸,1993,臺灣上市公司規模與有效稅率關係之實證研究—實徵會計理論政治成本假設之探討,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
戴嬡坪,1998,食品業赴大陸投資之研究,經濟情勢暨評論,第4卷,第1期:144-167。
蘇麗雀,2004,我國公司規模與有效稅率關係之研究,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。
Chan, K. Hung, and Phyllis Lai Lan Mo. 2000. Tax holidays and tax noncompliance: An empirical study of corporate tax audits in China’s developing economy. The Accounting Review 75(4): 469-484.
Chen, Ming-chin, Suming Lin, and Tien-hsun Chang. 2001. The impact of tax-exempt stock and land capital gains on corporate effective tax rates. Taiwan Accounting Review 2(1): 33-56.
Citizens for Tax Justice. 1985. Corporate Taxpayers & Corporate Freeloaders. Washington, D.C.: Citizens for Tax Justice.
Fullerton, Don. 1984. Which effective tax rate. National Tax Journal 37(1): 23-41.
Fullerton, Don, and Yolanda K. Henderson. 1985. Long run effects of the accelerated cost recovery system. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67(3): 363-373.
Guenther, David A. 1994. Earnings management in response to corporate tax rate changes: Evidence from the 1986 tax reform act. The Accounting Review 69(1): 230-243.
Gupta, S., and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16: 1-34.
Joint Committee on Taxation. 1984. Study of 1983 effective tax rates of selected large U.S. corporations, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Liu, Chi-chun, Suming Lin, and Der-fen Huang. 2001. Factors influencing corporate effective tax rates in Taiwan. Taiwan Accounting Review 2(1): 57-84.
Omer, Thomas C., Molloy, Karen H. and Ziebart, David A. 1993. An investigation of the firm size-effective tax rate relation in the 1980s. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 8(2): 167-182.
Porcano, T. 1986. Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 7(2): 17-31.
Shevlin, T. 1987. Taxes and off-balance-sheet financing: Research and development limited partnerships. The Accounting Review 62(3): 480-509.
Shevlin, T., and S. Porter. 1992. The corporate tax comeback in 1987: Some further evidence. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 14(1): 58-79.
Scholes, M. S., and Wolfson, M. A. 1992. Taxes and business strategy: A planning approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Siegfried, J. 1974. Effective average U.S. corporation income tax rates. National Tax Journal 27(2): 245-259.
Singh, Davinder, Wilder, Ronald P. and Chan, Kok Poh. 1987. Tax rates in small and large firms. American Journal of Small Business 12(2): 41-52.
Stickney, C. and V. McGee. 1982. Effective corporate tax rates: The effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1(2): 125-152.
Tung, Samuel, and Stella Cho. 2000. The impact of tax incentives on foreign direct investment in China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 9(2): 105-135.
Tung, Samuel, and Stella Cho. 2001. Determinants of regional investment decisions in China: An econometric model of tax incentive policy. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 17(2): 167-185.
Wang, Shiing-wu. 1991. The relation between firm size and effective tax rates: A tset of firms’ political success. The Accounting Review 66(1): 158-169.
Willie, P. 1988. Corporate average effective tax rates and inferences about relative tax preferences. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 10(1): 75-88.
Yelpaala, K. 1984. The efficacy of tax incentives within the framework of the neoclassical theory of foreign direct investment: A legislative policy analysis. Texas International Law Journal 19: 365-414.
Zimmerman, J. 1983. Tax and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5(2): 119-149.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
93353049
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353049
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳明進zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor CHEN, MING-CHINen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 姚彥成zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) YAO, YEN-CHENGen_US
dc.creator (作者) 姚彥成zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) YAO, YEN-CHENGen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 09:04:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 09:04:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 09:04:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093353049en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34231-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93353049zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以民國86年至民國93年上市公司財務報表資料探討我國企業赴中國大陸投資相關因素對有效稅率的影響。經本研究實證結果發現,有赴中國大陸投資的上市公司其有效稅率低於未赴中國大陸投資者;上市公司透過間接方式投資大陸地區之比重愈高者以及大陸地區投資獲利愈高者,由於有較多租稅規劃的空間,其有效稅率愈低。整體而言,在研究期間中,我國上市公司之平均有效稅率明顯低於營利事業所得稅名目最高邊際稅率;公司規模對有效稅率有負向影響,符合政治權力假說;本研究以長期負債、固定資產、存貨、研究發展費用做為投資理財決策的代理變數,皆與有效稅率呈現負相關,因此投資理財決策具有稅盾效果,可以降低公司稅負;另外,上市公司的獲利能力愈佳,有效稅率也愈高;證券以及土地交易所得等免稅所得較多的上市公司,有效稅率較低。上述分析顯示,上市公司赴中國大陸投資因素對於其租稅負擔有顯著影響,值得政府有關單位做為研擬相關法規的參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study uses 1997-2004 financial statement data to explore the relationships between investment in Mainland China and the effective tax rates (ETRs) of listed companies in Taiwan. The empirical results show that investment in Mainland China of the listed companies has a negative and significant impact on the ETRs. This study finds that ETRs is negatively related with the scale of indirect investment and the level of profit of subsidiaries in Mainland China, perhaps due to a higher flexibility and feasibility of tax planning. Our results also reveal that average ETRs of listed companies are substantially lower than the statutory tax rate of the Income Tax Act of R.O.C. Small firms are more likely to have greater ETRs, supporting the political power hypothesis. Moreover, because of the tax shield effects, long-term debts, fixed assets, inventories, and R&D expenses, all as proxies for the financial decisions, have negative and significant impacts on the ETRs of listed companies. Finally, ceteris paribus, profitable companies tend to have higher ETRs, and tax-exempt capital gains from stock and land transactions also reduce the ETRs of listed companies. These findings indicate that investment in Mainland China by listed companies plays an important role in their tax burdens, and this fact should be taken into account by the government in devising future tax reforms.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄 …………………………………………………………………I
圖表目錄 ……………………………………………………………II
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………1
第二節 研究問題………………………………………………6
第三節 研究架構………………………………………………7
第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………………………9
第一節 國外有效稅率相關文獻………………………………9
第二節 國內有效稅率相關文獻………………………………15
第三節 有效稅率之定義與衡量………………………………21
第四節 大陸投資相關租稅法規及文獻………………………29
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………31
第一節 研究假說………………………………………………31
第二節 實證模型分析…………………………………………36
第三節 變數定義與衡量………………………………………37
第四節 資料來源與樣本選取…………………………………42
第四章 實證結果與分析…………………………………………43
第一節 敘述性統計值…………………………………………43
第二節 迴歸結果與分析………………………………………47
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………55
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………55
第二節 研究限制………………………………………………57
第三節 研究建議………………………………………………58
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………60
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 172870 bytes-
dc.format.extent 96790 bytes-
dc.format.extent 162797 bytes-
dc.format.extent 166647 bytes-
dc.format.extent 252712 bytes-
dc.format.extent 386380 bytes-
dc.format.extent 305036 bytes-
dc.format.extent 312388 bytes-
dc.format.extent 215396 bytes-
dc.format.extent 170727 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353049en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 有效稅率zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大陸投資zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 間接投資zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 租稅負擔zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Effective tax ratesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Investment in Mainland Chinaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tax incentivesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tax burdenen_US
dc.title (題名) 上市公司赴大陸投資對有效稅率影響之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王淑靜,2002,台商赴大陸投資安排及租稅規劃—兼以某上市公司為個案分析,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱正仁、吳志正與林怡盈,2001,台商大陸投資兩岸三地財務績效之實證研究,中國大陸研究,第44卷,第9期:41-55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林世銘與楊朝旭,1994,上市公司營利事業所得稅負擔之研究,財稅研究,第26卷,第6期:34-52。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周添城、徐偉初與李新仁,1989a,不同企業規模、組織之賦稅分配研究,財政部賦稅改革委員會專題研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周添城、徐偉初、宋秀玲與李新仁,1989b,部門、產業間之賦稅分配研究,財政部賦稅改革委員會專題研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫克難與劉涵泰,2001,邊際有效稅率、租稅減免與投資行為—臺灣的實證研究,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳明進,2002,營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究,會計評論,第34期:57-75。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳明進,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響,管理評論,第22卷,第1期:127-151。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張天勳,1999,我國上市(櫃)公司有效稅率之實證研究—證券及土地交易免稅所得規定與集團企業因素之影響,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊雨霓,2005,會計方法選擇與公司有效稅率關聯性之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉孟俊,2004,大陸投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告,經濟部投資審議委員會委託中華經濟研究院編撰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡素幸,1993,臺灣上市公司規模與有效稅率關係之實證研究—實徵會計理論政治成本假設之探討,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戴嬡坪,1998,食品業赴大陸投資之研究,經濟情勢暨評論,第4卷,第1期:144-167。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇麗雀,2004,我國公司規模與有效稅率關係之研究,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chan, K. Hung, and Phyllis Lai Lan Mo. 2000. Tax holidays and tax noncompliance: An empirical study of corporate tax audits in China’s developing economy. The Accounting Review 75(4): 469-484.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, Ming-chin, Suming Lin, and Tien-hsun Chang. 2001. The impact of tax-exempt stock and land capital gains on corporate effective tax rates. Taiwan Accounting Review 2(1): 33-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Citizens for Tax Justice. 1985. Corporate Taxpayers & Corporate Freeloaders. Washington, D.C.: Citizens for Tax Justice.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fullerton, Don. 1984. Which effective tax rate. National Tax Journal 37(1): 23-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fullerton, Don, and Yolanda K. Henderson. 1985. Long run effects of the accelerated cost recovery system. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67(3): 363-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guenther, David A. 1994. Earnings management in response to corporate tax rate changes: Evidence from the 1986 tax reform act. The Accounting Review 69(1): 230-243.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gupta, S., and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16: 1-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joint Committee on Taxation. 1984. Study of 1983 effective tax rates of selected large U.S. corporations, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Liu, Chi-chun, Suming Lin, and Der-fen Huang. 2001. Factors influencing corporate effective tax rates in Taiwan. Taiwan Accounting Review 2(1): 57-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Omer, Thomas C., Molloy, Karen H. and Ziebart, David A. 1993. An investigation of the firm size-effective tax rate relation in the 1980s. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 8(2): 167-182.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Porcano, T. 1986. Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 7(2): 17-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shevlin, T. 1987. Taxes and off-balance-sheet financing: Research and development limited partnerships. The Accounting Review 62(3): 480-509.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shevlin, T., and S. Porter. 1992. The corporate tax comeback in 1987: Some further evidence. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 14(1): 58-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scholes, M. S., and Wolfson, M. A. 1992. Taxes and business strategy: A planning approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Siegfried, J. 1974. Effective average U.S. corporation income tax rates. National Tax Journal 27(2): 245-259.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Singh, Davinder, Wilder, Ronald P. and Chan, Kok Poh. 1987. Tax rates in small and large firms. American Journal of Small Business 12(2): 41-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stickney, C. and V. McGee. 1982. Effective corporate tax rates: The effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1(2): 125-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tung, Samuel, and Stella Cho. 2000. The impact of tax incentives on foreign direct investment in China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 9(2): 105-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tung, Samuel, and Stella Cho. 2001. Determinants of regional investment decisions in China: An econometric model of tax incentive policy. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 17(2): 167-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wang, Shiing-wu. 1991. The relation between firm size and effective tax rates: A tset of firms’ political success. The Accounting Review 66(1): 158-169.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Willie, P. 1988. Corporate average effective tax rates and inferences about relative tax preferences. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 10(1): 75-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yelpaala, K. 1984. The efficacy of tax incentives within the framework of the neoclassical theory of foreign direct investment: A legislative policy analysis. Texas International Law Journal 19: 365-414.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zimmerman, J. 1983. Tax and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5(2): 119-149.zh_TW