Publications-Theses

題名 我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究
作者 林尚志
貢獻者 林宛瑩
林尚志
關鍵詞 公司治理
評等指標
股權結構
董事會職責
透明度
線性結構關係模式
經營績效
公司價值
投資風險
corporate governance
ranking system
ownership structure
responsibility of the board
transparency
LISREL
operation performance
market value
investment risk
日期 2003
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 09:10:40 (UTC+8)
摘要 建構一套健全的公司治理評等機制,為落實公司治理相關議題的核心工作。本研究以經濟暨合作發展組織之公司治理原則、世界銀行之公司治理架構與國內外公司治理相關實證文獻作為理論基礎,透過分析量化之公司層級衡量指標,嘗試建構一套可行且適合衡量台灣企業之公司治理評等指標,以作為投資人制定投資決策與授信機構評估企業債信風險時之參考。
本研究以2002年國內523家非金融業上市公司為樣本,利用LISREL方法 (線性結構關係模式統計方法)建構台灣公司治理評等指標。分析結果共得出:股權結構構面 (盈餘股份比、專業機構投資者持股率);董事會職責構面 (盈餘席次比、外部董事席次比率、外部監察人席次數與外部董監持股率);財務透明度構面 (盈餘管理幅度、損益平穩化程度與財報重編率)等3個構面、9項衡量指標。
透過與企業當期及次期經營績效、公司價值與投資人投資風險間之關聯性實證測試,本研究發現,前項公司治理評等指標與企業之經營績效、公司價值呈顯著正相關,而與投資人投資風險呈顯著負相關。此項實證結果一方面顯示,前項公司治理評等指標愈佳,企業當期與次期之經營績效與公司價值愈高,投資人之投資風險愈低;另方面亦表示本研究所建構之公司治理評等指標對於企業之經營績效、公司價值與投資人投資風險,具有一定程度之關聯性與預測能力。
A well-developed corporate governance ranking system is essential to implantation of corporate governance. Base on principles proposed by OECD, a framework provided by the World-Bank and empirical literature on corporate governance, this research attempts to develop a workable TCGI (herein Taiwan Corporate Governance Index or TCGI) ranking system. The purpose of provision of TCGI is to help investors and creditors to make better decisions.
Using data for 523 non-banking corporations publicly traded at Taiwan Stock Exchange in 2002, and LISREL as the analytical tool, this research constructs a three-aspect (including ownership structure, responsibility of the board and financial transparency) TCGI ranking system with 9 corresponding indicators in total.
The empirical results of association tests show that TCGI indicators are significantly and positively (negatively) related to operation performance and market value (the occurrence of firms encountering financial difficulties). The findings thus imply that the TCGI ranking system developed in this research may be useful in investors and creditors decision-making.
參考文獻 一、中文部分:
(報紙)
經濟日報,2001.6.19,「張忠謀:亞洲公司治理 星港最佳」(4版)
經濟日報,2002.11.28,「世界通訊與美證管會達成民事和解」(10版)
(專書)
王文宇,2000,「公司與企業法制」,台北市:元照出版。
王保進,1996,「統計套裝程式SPSS與行為科學研究」,台北市:松崗出版。
伍忠賢,2003,「公司治理的第一本書」,台北市:商周出版。
周文賢,2002,「多變量統計分析」,台北市:智勝文化出版。
吳萬益,2000,「企業研究方法」,台北市:華泰文化出版。
程炳林、陳正昌,1994,「SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用」,台北市,文南書局出版。
黃俊英,2000,「多變量分析」,台北市:中國經濟企業研究所出版。
葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,「公司治理與評等系統」,台北市:商智文化出版。
劉紹樑,2002,「從莊子到安隆—A+公司治理」,台北市:天下雜誌出版。
(翻譯書)
薩門 (Walter Salmon)等著,2001,「公司治理—哈佛商業評論 (Harvard Business Review) 精選」,林宜賢、蔡慧菁譯,台北市:天下文化。
(期刊)
王文宇,2002,「從公司治理論董監事法制之改革」,台灣本土法學雜誌,第34期 (5月):99-116。
朱應舞,2002,「會計操縱,何趨何從?」,會計研究月刊,第203期 (10月):42-51。
柯承恩,2000,「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)」,會計研究月刊,第173期 (4月):75-81。
許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003a,「控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(上)」,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第42期 (7月):15-31。
---------,2003b,「控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(下)」,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第43期 (9月):11-26。
陳惠玲,2002,「由財報重編看財報可信度及CPA簽證品質--財務透明度評估之一」,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第37期 (9月):77-86。
葉銀華,2002,「從台灣上市公司網站資訊揭露看透明度」,會計研究月刊,第200期 (7月): 70-77。
葉銀華、邱顯比、張銘煌,1999,「基金經理人更換、董事會組成與績效之研究」,證券市場發展,第41期 (9月):25-60。
楊敏華,2003,「公司治理之研究」,法令月刊,第54期 (4月):46-62。
劉科,2002,「美國安隆公司破產事件涉及之財務報表及獨立董事資訊揭露問題之探討」,證券櫃檯月刊,第69期 (3月):27-35。
劉連煜,2003,「健全獨立董監事與公司治理之法制研究-公司自治、外部監控與政府規制之交錯」,月旦法學,第94期 (3月):131-154。
(研討會資料)
張忠謀,2001,「公司治理」,行政院知識經濟社會推動委員會公司治理研討會資料。
(碩博士論文)
王大維,2003,「公司治理相關要素與公司績效關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司為例」,淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
何里仁,2003,「公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究」,逢甲大學會計與財稅所未出版碩士論文。
何幸芳,2003,「獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
何淑瑜,2003,「台灣監察人監督績效之研究」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
呂彥慧,2000,「股權結構、監督機制、轉投資、交叉持股與公司經營績效之關係—以台灣新上市公司為例」國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
呂素嬌,2001,「企業財務危機與監察人結構特性之研究」,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。 
李孟芳,2003,「股權結構對企業財務資訊揭露品質之影響--以上市電子業公司為例」,國立成功大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
李哲宇,2000,「我國上市公司投資餘額變動頻率與財務性操縱關係之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
李亭誼,2003,「董事身份特性與董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度關係之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳昆皇,1995,「上市公司董事會組成與特性對企業經營績效之關聯性研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳建頤,1999,「董事會規模對公司價值的影響」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。   
林玉霞,2002,「臺灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究」,中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
林成章,2001,「台灣上市公司監察人監督績效之研究 」,義守大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
林明謙,2001,「股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
林柏全,2003,「董監事會特性與強制性財務預測準確性之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
林淑棻,2003,「公司股權結構、董事會組成結構以及財務政策與公司經營績效關係之研究」,國立政治大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林鼎堯,2003,「管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例關係:企業研發支出之實證研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
林麗珊,2003,「董監事運作與企業績效關係之研究-公司治理理念觀點」,國立台北大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
孫秀蘭,1996,「董事會制度與經營績效之研究 」國立台灣大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。
馬瑜霙,2003,「我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
翁淑育,2000,「台灣上市公司股權結構核心代理問題及公司價值之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
莊尚志,2003,「資訊揭露程度與資金成本關係之實證研究」,東吳大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
陳宏姿,2001,「董監事結構與企業財務績效關聯之研究」,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
陳迪,2003,「董事會、監察人特性與公司績效關聯之再探討」國立政治大學系會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳從聖,2003,「公司治理、高階管理者更迭與企業價值關係之研究」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所。
郭淑芬,1996,「董監事特性與盈餘操縱現象及盈餘品質之關聯性研究」,國立中正大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
許盟,2000,「我國董事會結構與自願性盈餘預測行為之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃鈺光,1993,「我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究」,國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
張峻萍,1999,「公司監理與經營績效之關係」,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
曾淑芬,2003,「股權結構與新上市公司異常報酬之研究」,彰化師範大學商業教育學系在職進修專班未出版碩士論文。
曾雅鳳,2001,「台灣公司董事監察人結構與經營績效之探討」,義守大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
董秋梅,2000,「機構投資人對企業R&D活動之影響」,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
楊慧玲,2000,「董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究」,朝陽大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。
劉宴辰,1993,「從代理理論觀點探究股權結構.董事會組成對企業財務績效影響之研究」,淡江大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
劉倩妏,2004,「以投資人關係為目的之資訊揭露」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
蔡坤哲,2003,「資訊揭露程度與盈餘管理關係之探討-以上市電子類股為例」,國立東華大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
羅陽春,2001,「我國上市公司董監改選前盈餘管理行為之研究」,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
(研究報告)
吳樂群、周行一、施敏雄、陳茵琦、簡淑芬,2001,「公司管控-董事及監察人如何執行職務」,公司治理專題研究報告。
財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨發展基金會,2001,「我國公司治理」。
葉銀華,1998,「家族控股、董事會組成與經營績效-台灣家族企業管治機制之研究」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
(網頁資料)
聯合知識庫 http://udndata.com/library/
公開資訊觀測站 http://mops.tse.com.tw/
二、英文部分:
(Journal Paper)
Agrawal, A., and C. R. Knoeber. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis 31: 377-397.
Bhattacharya, U., H. Daouk, and M. Welker. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review 78: 641-678.
Bock, R. D., and R. E. Bargmann. 1966. Analysis of covariance structures. Psychometrika 31: 507-533.
Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72: 323-349.
Chaganti, R., and F. Damanpour.1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23: 70-74.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57: 2741-2771.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes : A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61: 400-421.
Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 375-390.
Diamond, D.W., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capial. The Journal of Finance 46: 1325-1360.
Faccio, M., and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. The separation of ownership and control: An analysis of ultimate ownership in western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65: 365-395.
Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problem and theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
Friedlan J. M. 1994. Accounting choices of issuers of initial public offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 1-32.
Hansen, G. S., and C. W. L. Hill. 1991. Are institutional investors myopic? A time series study of four technology-driven industry. Strategic Management Journal 12: 1-16.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 85-107.
Healy, P. M., and J. M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13: 365-383.
Hermalin, B. E., and M. Weisbach. 1991. The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management 20: 101-112.
Ho, S. S. M., and K. S. Wong. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting Auditing & Taxation 10: 139-156.
Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48: 831-880.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, and E. Friedman. 2000. Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 141-186.
Kesner, I. F. 1987. Directors stock ownership and organization performance: An investigation of fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management 13: 499-507.
Klein, A. 1998. Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics 41: 275-303.
Kosnik, R. D. 1987. Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 163-185.
Lang, L. H. P., R. M. Stulz, and R. A. Walking. 1989. Managerial performance, Tobin’s q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24: 137-154.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silances, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52: 1131-1150.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113-1155.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 3-27.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57: 1147-1170.
Leland, H., and D. H. Pyle. 1977. Information asymmetric, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32: 371-388.
Lemoon, M. L., and K. V. Lins. 2003. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. The Journal of Finance 58: 1445-1468.
Lindenberg, E. B., and S. A. Ross. 1981. Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54: 1-32.
Lins, K. V. 2003. Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38: 159-185.
Lipton, M., and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48: 59-77.
McConnell, J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
McKinsey & Company, June 2000. Investor Opinion Survey.
McKinsey & Company, June 2002. Investor Opinion Survey.
Millstein, I. M., and P. W. MacAvoy. 1998. The active board of directors and performance of the large publicly traded corporations. Columbia Law Review 98: 1283-1321.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
Oviatt, B. M. 1988. Agency and transaction cost perspectives on themanager-shareholder relationship, incentives for congruent interests. Academy of Management Review 13: 214-225.
Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237-265.
Prowse, S. 1998. Corporate governance: Emerging issues and lessons from East Asia. Responding to the Global Financial Crisis -World Bank.
Rajan, R., and L. Zingales. 1998. Which capitalism? Lessons from the East Asian crisis. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11: 40-48.
Schellenger, M. H., D. D. Wood, and A. Tashakori. 1989. Board of director compensation, shareholder wealth, and dividend policy. Journal of Management 15: 457-467.
Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earning management. Accounting Horizons 3: 91-102.
Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94: 461-488.
Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52: 737-783.
Stulz, R. 1988. Managerial control of voting rights, financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 25-54.
Szewczyk, S. H., G. P. Tsetsekos, and R. Varma. 1992. Institutional ownership and the liquidity of common stock offerings. The Financial Review 27: 211-225.
Williamson, O. E. 1983. Organization form residual claimants and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 351-366.
World Bank, 1999. Corporate governance: A framework for implementation -overview. P5.
Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family control and corporate governance: Evidence for Taiwan. International Review of Finance 2: 21-48.
Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.
Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrated model. Journal of Management 15: 291- 334.
(Book)
Berle, A., and G. C. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, NY: MacMillan.
Mintzberg, H. 1983. Power in and Around Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(Working Paper)
Edwards, J., and A. Weichenrieder. 1999. Ownership concentration and share valuation: Evidence from Germany. CESifo Working Paper No193.
(Conference Paper)
Bacon, J. 1973. Corporate directorship practices: Membership and committees of the board. New York:The Conference Board and American Society of Corporate Secretaries.
Ho, S. S. M., and K. S. Wong. 1999. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosures. Unpublished Conference Paper, AAA/TAA Globalization Conference, Taiwan.
(Internet)
FASB, Business Reporting Research Project (BRRP). 2001. Imporving Business Reporting: Insights into Enhancing Voluntary Disclosures.
http://www.fasb.org/brrp/brrp2.shtml
Standard & Poor`s Corporation. 2001. Standard & Poor’s Transparency and Disclosure Survey for International Investors.
http://www.standardandpoors.com/Forum/RatingsAnalysis/CorporateGovernance/index.html
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353007
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913530073
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林宛瑩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林尚志zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林尚志zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 09:10:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 09:10:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 09:10:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0913530073en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34264-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91353007zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 建構一套健全的公司治理評等機制,為落實公司治理相關議題的核心工作。本研究以經濟暨合作發展組織之公司治理原則、世界銀行之公司治理架構與國內外公司治理相關實證文獻作為理論基礎,透過分析量化之公司層級衡量指標,嘗試建構一套可行且適合衡量台灣企業之公司治理評等指標,以作為投資人制定投資決策與授信機構評估企業債信風險時之參考。
本研究以2002年國內523家非金融業上市公司為樣本,利用LISREL方法 (線性結構關係模式統計方法)建構台灣公司治理評等指標。分析結果共得出:股權結構構面 (盈餘股份比、專業機構投資者持股率);董事會職責構面 (盈餘席次比、外部董事席次比率、外部監察人席次數與外部董監持股率);財務透明度構面 (盈餘管理幅度、損益平穩化程度與財報重編率)等3個構面、9項衡量指標。
透過與企業當期及次期經營績效、公司價值與投資人投資風險間之關聯性實證測試,本研究發現,前項公司治理評等指標與企業之經營績效、公司價值呈顯著正相關,而與投資人投資風險呈顯著負相關。此項實證結果一方面顯示,前項公司治理評等指標愈佳,企業當期與次期之經營績效與公司價值愈高,投資人之投資風險愈低;另方面亦表示本研究所建構之公司治理評等指標對於企業之經營績效、公司價值與投資人投資風險,具有一定程度之關聯性與預測能力。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) A well-developed corporate governance ranking system is essential to implantation of corporate governance. Base on principles proposed by OECD, a framework provided by the World-Bank and empirical literature on corporate governance, this research attempts to develop a workable TCGI (herein Taiwan Corporate Governance Index or TCGI) ranking system. The purpose of provision of TCGI is to help investors and creditors to make better decisions.
Using data for 523 non-banking corporations publicly traded at Taiwan Stock Exchange in 2002, and LISREL as the analytical tool, this research constructs a three-aspect (including ownership structure, responsibility of the board and financial transparency) TCGI ranking system with 9 corresponding indicators in total.
The empirical results of association tests show that TCGI indicators are significantly and positively (negatively) related to operation performance and market value (the occurrence of firms encountering financial difficulties). The findings thus imply that the TCGI ranking system developed in this research may be useful in investors and creditors decision-making.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ
表目錄……………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
第壹章 緒論
第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究目的與預期貢獻……………………………………………… 4
第三節 研究架構與研究問題……………………………………………… 7
第四節 論文結構…………………………………………………………… 8
第貳章 文獻探討
第一節 公司治理的定義…………………………………………………… 9
第二節 公司治理的架構與原則…………………………………………… 11
第三節 公司治理相關的實證文獻………………………………………… 20
第四節 現有公司治理評等指標之比較…………………………………… 42
第五節 公司治理評等指標效用之測試…………………………………… 45
第參章 研究方法
第一節 線性結構關係模式介紹…………………………………………… 48
第二節 公司治理評等指標之建構………………………………………… 60
第三節 公司治理評等指標之測試………………………………………… 72
第四節 研究設計…………………………………………………………… 80
第肆章 實證結果分析
第一節 敘述性統計分析…………………………………………………… 82
第二節 LISREL模式分析…………………………………………………… 89
第三節 迴歸模式分析……………………………………………………… 99
第伍章 研究結論與建議
第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………109
第二節 研究限制……………………………………………………………113
第三節 後續研究建議………………………………………………………114
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………117
附錄 …………………………………………………………………………125

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究架構……………………………………………………………… 7
圖2-1 世界銀行之公司治理架構……………………………………………11
圖3-1 LISREL之線性結構關係………………………………………………52
圖3-2 LISREL之結構關係模式………………………………………………53
圖3-3 LISREL之衡量模式……………………………………………………53
圖3-4 LISREL模式之分析步驟………………………………………………57
圖3-5 公司治理評等指標構面之結構關係模式……………………………63
圖3-6 股權結構構面之衡量模式……………………………………………64
圖3-7 董事會職責構面之衡量模式…………………………………………67
圖3-8 財務透明度構面之衡量模式…………………………………………70
圖3-9 股東權益構面之衡量模式……………………………………………71
圖4-1 公司治理評等指標構面之結構關係模式……………………………91
圖4-2 公司治理評等指標構面之線性結構關係圖…………………………93

表目錄
表2-1 里昂證券、標準普爾與葉銀華等學者之公司治理評等系統比較…44
表3-1 LISREL模式配適度判定指標之綜合整理……………………………59
表3-2 OECD的公司治理原則與主要議題內容………………………………60
表4-1 衡量指標變數敘述性資料……………………………………………84
表4-2 產業別樣本資料………………………………………………………88
表4-3 LISREL模式整體配適度評估結果……………………………………89
表4-4 LISREL結構模式評估結果……………………………………………90
表4-5 LISREL衡量模式評估結果……………………………………………92
表4-6 公司治理評等指標評分表……………………………………………95
表4-7 產業別之公司治理評等指標…………………………………………98
表4-8 公司治理評等指標與公司當期經營績效間之關聯性(2002/12)… 99
表4-9 公司治理評等指標與公司未來經營績效間之關聯性(2003/06)…101
表4-10 公司治理評等指標與公司價值間之關聯性………………………103
表4-11 公司治理評等指標與公司當期投資人投資風險間之關聯性……105
表4-12 財務危機機率與公司治理評等指標間之關聯性…………………107
表5-1 公司治理評等指標衡量變數之權重彙總整理……………………110
附錄表1 2001~2002年間美國主要企業弊案之整理………………………125
附錄表2 1998年間國內主要地雷股案件之整理 …………………………126
附錄表3 公司治理相關實證文獻之彙總整理……………………………127
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 41681 bytes-
dc.format.extent 43275 bytes-
dc.format.extent 78231 bytes-
dc.format.extent 47614 bytes-
dc.format.extent 65201 bytes-
dc.format.extent 148082 bytes-
dc.format.extent 138847 bytes-
dc.format.extent 129252 bytes-
dc.format.extent 58790 bytes-
dc.format.extent 71201 bytes-
dc.format.extent 60464 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913530073en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 評等指標zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 股權結構zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 董事會職責zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 透明度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 線性結構關係模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經營績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司價值zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 投資風險zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) corporate governanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ranking systemen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ownership structureen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) responsibility of the boarden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) transparencyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) LISRELen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) operation performanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) market valueen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) investment risken_US
dc.title (題名) 我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (報紙)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 經濟日報,2001.6.19,「張忠謀:亞洲公司治理 星港最佳」(4版)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 經濟日報,2002.11.28,「世界通訊與美證管會達成民事和解」(10版)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (專書)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王文宇,2000,「公司與企業法制」,台北市:元照出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王保進,1996,「統計套裝程式SPSS與行為科學研究」,台北市:松崗出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 伍忠賢,2003,「公司治理的第一本書」,台北市:商周出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周文賢,2002,「多變量統計分析」,台北市:智勝文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳萬益,2000,「企業研究方法」,台北市:華泰文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 程炳林、陳正昌,1994,「SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用」,台北市,文南書局出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃俊英,2000,「多變量分析」,台北市:中國經濟企業研究所出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,「公司治理與評等系統」,台北市:商智文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉紹樑,2002,「從莊子到安隆—A+公司治理」,台北市:天下雜誌出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (翻譯書)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 薩門 (Walter Salmon)等著,2001,「公司治理—哈佛商業評論 (Harvard Business Review) 精選」,林宜賢、蔡慧菁譯,台北市:天下文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (期刊)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王文宇,2002,「從公司治理論董監事法制之改革」,台灣本土法學雜誌,第34期 (5月):99-116。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱應舞,2002,「會計操縱,何趨何從?」,會計研究月刊,第203期 (10月):42-51。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 柯承恩,2000,「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)」,會計研究月刊,第173期 (4月):75-81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003a,「控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(上)」,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第42期 (7月):15-31。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---------,2003b,「控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(下)」,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第43期 (9月):11-26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳惠玲,2002,「由財報重編看財報可信度及CPA簽證品質--財務透明度評估之一」,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第37期 (9月):77-86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉銀華,2002,「從台灣上市公司網站資訊揭露看透明度」,會計研究月刊,第200期 (7月): 70-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉銀華、邱顯比、張銘煌,1999,「基金經理人更換、董事會組成與績效之研究」,證券市場發展,第41期 (9月):25-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊敏華,2003,「公司治理之研究」,法令月刊,第54期 (4月):46-62。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉科,2002,「美國安隆公司破產事件涉及之財務報表及獨立董事資訊揭露問題之探討」,證券櫃檯月刊,第69期 (3月):27-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉連煜,2003,「健全獨立董監事與公司治理之法制研究-公司自治、外部監控與政府規制之交錯」,月旦法學,第94期 (3月):131-154。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (研討會資料)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張忠謀,2001,「公司治理」,行政院知識經濟社會推動委員會公司治理研討會資料。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (碩博士論文)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王大維,2003,「公司治理相關要素與公司績效關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司為例」,淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何里仁,2003,「公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究」,逢甲大學會計與財稅所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何幸芳,2003,「獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何淑瑜,2003,「台灣監察人監督績效之研究」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂彥慧,2000,「股權結構、監督機制、轉投資、交叉持股與公司經營績效之關係—以台灣新上市公司為例」國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂素嬌,2001,「企業財務危機與監察人結構特性之研究」,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。 zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李孟芳,2003,「股權結構對企業財務資訊揭露品質之影響--以上市電子業公司為例」,國立成功大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李哲宇,2000,「我國上市公司投資餘額變動頻率與財務性操縱關係之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李亭誼,2003,「董事身份特性與董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度關係之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳昆皇,1995,「上市公司董事會組成與特性對企業經營績效之關聯性研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳建頤,1999,「董事會規模對公司價值的影響」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。   zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林玉霞,2002,「臺灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究」,中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林成章,2001,「台灣上市公司監察人監督績效之研究 」,義守大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林明謙,2001,「股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林柏全,2003,「董監事會特性與強制性財務預測準確性之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林淑棻,2003,「公司股權結構、董事會組成結構以及財務政策與公司經營績效關係之研究」,國立政治大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林鼎堯,2003,「管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例關係:企業研發支出之實證研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林麗珊,2003,「董監事運作與企業績效關係之研究-公司治理理念觀點」,國立台北大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫秀蘭,1996,「董事會制度與經營績效之研究 」國立台灣大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬瑜霙,2003,「我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翁淑育,2000,「台灣上市公司股權結構核心代理問題及公司價值之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莊尚志,2003,「資訊揭露程度與資金成本關係之實證研究」,東吳大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳宏姿,2001,「董監事結構與企業財務績效關聯之研究」,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳迪,2003,「董事會、監察人特性與公司績效關聯之再探討」國立政治大學系會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳從聖,2003,「公司治理、高階管理者更迭與企業價值關係之研究」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭淑芬,1996,「董監事特性與盈餘操縱現象及盈餘品質之關聯性研究」,國立中正大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許盟,2000,「我國董事會結構與自願性盈餘預測行為之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃鈺光,1993,「我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究」,國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張峻萍,1999,「公司監理與經營績效之關係」,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾淑芬,2003,「股權結構與新上市公司異常報酬之研究」,彰化師範大學商業教育學系在職進修專班未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾雅鳳,2001,「台灣公司董事監察人結構與經營績效之探討」,義守大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 董秋梅,2000,「機構投資人對企業R&D活動之影響」,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊慧玲,2000,「董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究」,朝陽大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉宴辰,1993,「從代理理論觀點探究股權結構.董事會組成對企業財務績效影響之研究」,淡江大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉倩妏,2004,「以投資人關係為目的之資訊揭露」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡坤哲,2003,「資訊揭露程度與盈餘管理關係之探討-以上市電子類股為例」,國立東華大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅陽春,2001,「我國上市公司董監改選前盈餘管理行為之研究」,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (研究報告)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳樂群、周行一、施敏雄、陳茵琦、簡淑芬,2001,「公司管控-董事及監察人如何執行職務」,公司治理專題研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨發展基金會,2001,「我國公司治理」。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉銀華,1998,「家族控股、董事會組成與經營績效-台灣家族企業管治機制之研究」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (網頁資料)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 聯合知識庫 http://udndata.com/library/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 公開資訊觀測站 http://mops.tse.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Journal Paper)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Agrawal, A., and C. R. Knoeber. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis 31: 377-397.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhattacharya, U., H. Daouk, and M. Welker. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review 78: 641-678.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bock, R. D., and R. E. Bargmann. 1966. Analysis of covariance structures. Psychometrika 31: 507-533.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72: 323-349.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaganti, R., and F. Damanpour.1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23: 70-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57: 2741-2771.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes : A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61: 400-421.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 375-390.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Diamond, D.W., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capial. The Journal of Finance 46: 1325-1360.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Faccio, M., and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. The separation of ownership and control: An analysis of ultimate ownership in western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65: 365-395.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problem and theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Friedlan J. M. 1994. Accounting choices of issuers of initial public offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 1-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hansen, G. S., and C. W. L. Hill. 1991. Are institutional investors myopic? A time series study of four technology-driven industry. Strategic Management Journal 12: 1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 85-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healy, P. M., and J. M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13: 365-383.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hermalin, B. E., and M. Weisbach. 1991. The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management 20: 101-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ho, S. S. M., and K. S. Wong. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting Auditing & Taxation 10: 139-156.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48: 831-880.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. C., and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, and E. Friedman. 2000. Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 141-186.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kesner, I. F. 1987. Directors stock ownership and organization performance: An investigation of fortune 500 companies. Journal of Management 13: 499-507.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Klein, A. 1998. Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics 41: 275-303.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kosnik, R. D. 1987. Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 163-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lang, L. H. P., R. M. Stulz, and R. A. Walking. 1989. Managerial performance, Tobin’s q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24: 137-154.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silances, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52: 1131-1150.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113-1155.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 3-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57: 1147-1170.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leland, H., and D. H. Pyle. 1977. Information asymmetric, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32: 371-388.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lemoon, M. L., and K. V. Lins. 2003. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. The Journal of Finance 58: 1445-1468.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lindenberg, E. B., and S. A. Ross. 1981. Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54: 1-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lins, K. V. 2003. Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38: 159-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lipton, M., and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48: 59-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McConnell, J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McKinsey & Company, June 2000. Investor Opinion Survey.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McKinsey & Company, June 2002. Investor Opinion Survey.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Millstein, I. M., and P. W. MacAvoy. 1998. The active board of directors and performance of the large publicly traded corporations. Columbia Law Review 98: 1283-1321.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oviatt, B. M. 1988. Agency and transaction cost perspectives on themanager-shareholder relationship, incentives for congruent interests. Academy of Management Review 13: 214-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237-265.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prowse, S. 1998. Corporate governance: Emerging issues and lessons from East Asia. Responding to the Global Financial Crisis -World Bank.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rajan, R., and L. Zingales. 1998. Which capitalism? Lessons from the East Asian crisis. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11: 40-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schellenger, M. H., D. D. Wood, and A. Tashakori. 1989. Board of director compensation, shareholder wealth, and dividend policy. Journal of Management 15: 457-467.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earning management. Accounting Horizons 3: 91-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94: 461-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52: 737-783.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stulz, R. 1988. Managerial control of voting rights, financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 25-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Szewczyk, S. H., G. P. Tsetsekos, and R. Varma. 1992. Institutional ownership and the liquidity of common stock offerings. The Financial Review 27: 211-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williamson, O. E. 1983. Organization form residual claimants and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 351-366.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) World Bank, 1999. Corporate governance: A framework for implementation -overview. P5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family control and corporate governance: Evidence for Taiwan. International Review of Finance 2: 21-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrated model. Journal of Management 15: 291- 334.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Book)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berle, A., and G. C. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, NY: MacMillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mintzberg, H. 1983. Power in and Around Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Working Paper)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edwards, J., and A. Weichenrieder. 1999. Ownership concentration and share valuation: Evidence from Germany. CESifo Working Paper No193.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Conference Paper)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bacon, J. 1973. Corporate directorship practices: Membership and committees of the board. New York:The Conference Board and American Society of Corporate Secretaries.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ho, S. S. M., and K. S. Wong. 1999. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosures. Unpublished Conference Paper, AAA/TAA Globalization Conference, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Internet)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) FASB, Business Reporting Research Project (BRRP). 2001. Imporving Business Reporting: Insights into Enhancing Voluntary Disclosures.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.fasb.org/brrp/brrp2.shtmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Standard & Poor`s Corporation. 2001. Standard & Poor’s Transparency and Disclosure Survey for International Investors.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.standardandpoors.com/Forum/RatingsAnalysis/CorporateGovernance/index.htmlzh_TW