Publications-Theses

題名 航空產業對溫室效應的影響與改善對策
作者 葉清發
貢獻者 溫肇東
葉清發
關鍵詞 溫室效應
航空產業
排放交易
國際合作
日期 2007
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 09:31:55 (UTC+8)
摘要 2007年諾貝爾和平獎頒給了美國前副總統高爾和聯合國跨政府氣候變遷小組(IPCC),表揚他們致力於全球氣候變遷的議題。2005年2月「京都議定書」正式生效,目的在削減二氧化碳等六種溫室氣體的排放量,國際航空並未列在削減溫室氣體的範圍,但委由國際民航組織(ICAO)負責國際航空溫室氣體排放減量,這顯示在「聯合國氣候變化綱要公約(UNFCCC)」架構外,以產業合作模式來削減溫室氣體在政治上是可行的。飛機引擎將二氧化碳、氧化氮、碳氫化合物、水蒸氣、硫酸鹽、煙塵顆粒直接排放於大氣中,這些噴射物和大氣的成分產生複雜的化學變化,改變大氣的成分,所排放的高溫水氣在對流層凝結為飛行雲和卷雲,除二氧化碳確定會造成溫室效應外,其餘排放的廢氣尚缺乏科學證據和溫室效應有關。國際航空既有「京都議定書」不須限制溫室氣體排放的法律基礎,且大部分排放的廢氣尚缺乏影響溫室效應的科學證據以致航空產業對削減溫室氣體排放量的行動並不積極,但航空的旅客每年以約5%的速度成長,航空未來是廢氣排放增加最快的產業。在歐美國家積極進行大氣科學的研究以了解溫室效應的成因,台灣近日宣佈將加入全球最大的溫室效應氣體觀測平台MOZAIC,航空產業有必要採取負責的行動減緩溫室氣體排放量。
本研究主要蒐集國內外相關的學術研究資料,波音公司的環保政策及公司專業人員的意見,歸納出航空產業改善溫室效應的對策,並以英航為個案,探討其以排放交易體系及碳補償體系改善溫室氣體排放的實效來驗證其可行性,最後探討在ICAO架構下,航空產業如何循序漸進的進行溫室氣體減量的國際合作。本研究旨在回答下列問題:
1. 航空產業對溫室效應的影響?
2. 航空產業在科技面、營運操作面、經濟政策面可以減緩溫室氣體排放的對策有哪些?哪一個對策成本較低,較有效?
3. 航空產業相關的企業組織中,誰最適合做為溫室氣體排放負責的實體?
4. 以利害關係人的觀點,評估經濟政策面的解決方案在經濟面的衝擊為何?
5. 在ICAO的架構下如何進行航空產業溫室氣體減量的國際合作?
本研究得到的結論如下:
1. 經由航空科技的研發,是削減溫室氣體排放量的根本方法,因為它有利於所有利害關係人,但新一代的航空科技研發通常需要10-15年以上的時間,以及充滿不確定性,所以在短、中期不是削減溫室氣體排放的有效方法。
2. 改善航管系統及飛航操作的方法在法律、技術及經濟上所面臨的挑戰比較小,在短、中期就可以減少8-18%燃油的消耗,不過長期而言,不足以抵消航空產業每年成長所增加的廢氣排放量。
3. 排放交易體系是以市場機制運作的碳交易市場,航空產業在開放式的排放交易體系可用最低的減緩成本達到排放減量目標。排放交易體系經過英航實際運作證明它是可行的方法,既可以達到減量的目標又不會妨礙航空產業的成長。
4. ICAO是1944年依據芝加哥公約成立的,它的會員國適用”無差異原則”,聯合國氣候變化綱要公約(UNFCCC)的會員國適用”共同但有差異的責任”,所以京都議定書也只對Annex I的國家限制溫室氣體排放量。在會員國不同意單方面擴展排放交易體系下,ICAO要求在雙方同意下才能將他國的航班併到自己的排放交易體系,這使得歐盟在2012年企圖單方面擴展排放交易體系到所有進出歐盟的航班變得不大可能,這對歐盟積極推動溫室氣體減量的行動是一項挫折。
5. 飛機引擎所排放的廢氣,除二氧化碳確定會造成溫室效應外,其餘排放的廢氣尚缺乏科學證據會造成溫室效應。這種缺乏科學證據的氣候協商在國際間很難達成共識,所以在ICAO及IATA的排放交易體系都只建議限制二氧化碳的排放量,但二氧化碳只佔航空器排放廢氣的37%,這種溫室氣體的限制並不具環境的有效性。
6. 全球暖化已成為全球矚目的議題,各國紛紛採取「節能減碳」措施,台灣也不例外,京都議定書顯然不能有效解決溫室效應問題。在2012年後替代的新合約必定增加溫室氣體限制的國家及產業,也有可能包含航空產業。航空公司可以從參與碳補償體系、和政府簽署自願環保合約、參與其他產業的自願排放交易體系,先取得碳市場的交易經驗,日後可在UNFCCC或ICAO的架構下承諾溫室氣體排放減量。
In 2007, the Nobel Peace prize was awarded to the former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore and the IPCC for their great efforts in global climate change issue. The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on February 16, 2005; this treaty assigns mandatory emission limitations for the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) to the signatory nations. International aviation GHG emissions are not included in Kyoto Protocol, as it will be addressed through the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) according to Article 2.2 of the Kyoto Protocol. This indicates that it is politically agreed upon to use a sector-based approach to limit GHG emission beyond the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
During flight, aircraft engines emit carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, water vapor, hydrocarbons and particles. These emissions alter the chemical composition of the atmosphere in a variety of ways. Except for carbon dioxide, the other emissions from aircraft in flight are still under investigation for their impact on global climate change. Passenger airlines growth is anticipated to increase about 5% annually, so the aviation industry is expected to be the fastest growing emissions contributor in the future. Therefore, the aviation industry should take responsible actions to alleviate GHG emission. For exploring the root cause of global climate change, European and American scientists are leading the investigation of the atmosphere, and the government of Taiwan recently announced they will support MOZAIC in their observation of the north Pacific atmosphere.
This research is performed by reviewing the articles published by researchers, the briefing material from aircraft manufacturer and the expertise from companies. The conclusions are that the methods are useful to alleviate GHG emission for aviation industry. Meanwhile, British Airways was selected to be the case study to verify their implementation of environmental policy. Finally, an approach under ICAO is being introduced for the aviation industry to alleviate GHG emission through global collaboration. This study is to answer the following questions:
1. What is the environmental impact by the emissions from the aviation industry?
2. What methods are available from technology, flight operations and economic policies to alleviate GHG emission? Which one is more economic and effective?
3. Who is the accountable entity in the aviation industry to alleviate GHG emissions?
4. What is the impact on economics by the method of implementation of economic policies to alleviate GHG emissions based on the stakeholders’ viewpoints?
5. How does the aviation industry collaborate globally to alleviate GHG emissions under ICAO?
The conclusions from the research are as follows.
1. The basic method for the aviation industry to resolve GHG emissions is by the use of new fuel or engine technologies. Normally, it takes 10 to 15 years to pioneer new technologies for aviation with uncertainty, so it is not an effective method in short and mid term to alleviate GHG emissions.
2. The improvement of air traffic management and flight operation presents little difficulty in law, technologies and economics to alleviate GHG emissions. This method can reduce 8-18% of fuel comsumption in short and mid term, but it can not offset the growing emissions by air traffic annually.
3. The Aviation Industry can reach the lowest alleviation cost to meet emissions target by open emission trading scheme. Emission trading is not only environmentally effective, but also does not hinder the growth of aviation industry in the future.
4. The ICAO, the state members apply to the principle of non-discrimination, however the UNFCCC, the state members apply to the principle of common but differential responsibility. The Kyoto Protocol just restricts the GHG emissions for Annex I countries. ICAO is obliged to request the integration of foreign operators in the emission trading scheme “under a mutually agreed basis”.
5. Except for carbon dioxide, the other emissions from aircraft are under investigation for their impact on environment. The emission of carbon dioxide is only 37% of all emissions by aviation industry. The ICAO and IATA only recommend to restrict carbon dioxide emissions, so it is not environmentally effective.
6. The following treaty after 2012 should involve more countries and industries for GHG emission restriction, and the aviation industry might be involved in the new treaty. Therefore, airlines should seek the opportunity to participate voluntarily in the carbon trading market to gain experience in this strategy. Then, airlines can commit to reduce GHG emission under UNFCCC or IACO in the future.
參考文獻 一、中文部份
1. 朱淑娟報導,6月20日聯合報,”環保署:買賣碳權要先建立制度”.
2. 李儒哲,”我國課徵碳稅可行性之評估(上)”,pp.1-7,”我國課徵碳稅可行性之評估(下)”,pp.1-7, 2007年11月26日取自:
http://www.taxresearch.org.tw/publishcation/specialtopic/topic_121.htm
3. 高國珍報導,6月3日聯合報,”監控全球溫室效應 台灣加入”.
4. 彭浩偉 (2007),”歐盟擬將民航機納入碳管制 美帶頭嗆聲”,pp.154-155,商業周刊1038期.
5. 楊少強 (2007),”未來溫度未必會上升”,pp.104,商業周刊1015期.
6. 蔡勳雄 (2008),”台灣地區因應地球暖化之能源政策”,2008年6月30日取自:http://www.lib.tut.edu.tw/lecture_siew/970512/siew13.ppt
7. 魏國棟,”氣候變遷與因應經濟政策工具:文獻回顧”,pp.1-58,2007年11月5日取自:
http://www.ntpu.edu.tw/econ/TEI/Ejournal/39.1/390102.pdf
8. 無名氏 (2007),”經濟蝴蝶效應”,pp.100-106,商業周刊1013期.
9. 無名氏 (2007),”新能源投資成效繫於各國碳價水準”, pp.142-144,商業周刊1020期.
一、英文部分
1. Aimee Turner, David Learmount (2007),”Environment Special report: Green Wars;Cost of Waiting”, Flight International ,pp.24-31.
2. Andrew Sentence (2003),”Address climate change – the way ahead for aviation”,2008年4月30取自:
http://www.heathrowairport.com/assets/B2CPortal/Static%20Files/AndrewSentance13October03.pdf
3. Anne Paylor (Feb.2007),”A Fair Trade?”,Air Transport World(ATW), pp.40-42.
4. Anthony Concil (2007),”Key Priorities for Developing next Generation ATM systems”,2008年3月10日取自:
http://www1.iata.org/pressroom/speeches/2007-02-13-01
5. Arthur Andersen (2001),”Emissions trading for Aviation”,pp. 1-42,2008年5月5日取自:
http://www.iata.org/NR/ContentConnector/CS2000/Siteinterface/sites/mgr/file/final_report.pdf
6. Ben Van Houtte (2004),“The Single European Sky”,Skyway 32, 2008年12月17日取自:
http://www.eurocontrol.int/epr/gallery/content/public/docs/sky_spr_p08.pdf
7. Bertram Spector (Apr 1992),”International Environmental Negotiation: Insights for Practice, Executive Report (ER-21)”, International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA),2007年 10月30日取自:
http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/ER-92-021.pdf
8. Brendan Sobie (Jul 2008),”Air France steps up eco drive”,Airline Business.
9. Brian Pearce, Chief Economist,”2007 marks the peak of the cycle – the outlook has become more challenging”,IATA.
10. David Daggett, Gerhard Seidel, Robert McKinley, Robert Plencner (2001),”Airplane Technologies to Reduce Jet Fuel Use”, SAE World Aviation Congress, Document No.:2001-01-2985.
11. David Daggett, Robert Hendricks, Rainer Walther, Edwin Corporam (2007),”Alternate Fuels for use in Commercial Aircraft”, The Boeing Company.
12. Giovanni Bisignani,”IATA industry-wide strategy to address climate change”,IATA, 2008年4月23日取自:
http://www.iata.org/NR/rdonlyres/80F7AA1C-2CE1-40B0-A2D5-C9AE38259AC2/0/4153400Climatechangeflyer4.pdf
13. Guy Norris, Geoffey Thomas, Mark Wagner, and Christine Forbes Smith, “Boeing 787 Dreamliner – flying redefined”, pp.42-43, pp.50-52, The Boeing Company.
14. James Randall Kahn and Dina Franceschi (2005),”Beyond Kyoto: A tax-based system for the global reduction of greenhouse gas emissions”, pp. 1-9, Ecological Economics,2007年12月26日取自:
http://www.greeneconomics.net/ClimateTax.pdf
15. Kati Kulovesi & Katja Keinanen,“Long-term climate policy:internation Legal aspects of a sector-based approach”, pp.1-14, 2008年2月5日取自: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=29397&lan=fi
16. Kevin Baumert, Timothy Herzog and Jonathan Pershing,”Navigating the numbers:Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy”,pp.1-67,pp.110-119, World Resources Institute, 2007年12月1日取自:
http://archive.wri.org/publication_detail.cfm?pubid=4093
17. Mike Hung, Engineering and Maintenance Division of EVA,”Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum”, Engineering and Maintenance Division of EVA.
18. Peter Gwynne (Apr 1975),“The Cooling World”,Newsweek,2008年5 月29日取自: http://www.denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm
19. Per Noren (2008),”Boeing Environmental Strategy”, The Boeing Company.
20. Phil Chapman (Apr 2008),“Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age comth”,PP.1-2, 2008年5月29日取自: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23583376-7583,00.html
21. Tale/artikkel (Apr 2007), “No reason for international aviation and maritime transport to be excluded from a new climate regime”, 2008年7月17日取自:
http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/md/dep/politisk_ledelse/Tidligere-statssekretarer-og-radgivere/Henriette_Westhrin/taler_artikler/2007/--No-reason-for-international-aviation-a.html?id=484638
22. Thilo Kunzemann (2007),”Trade or Tax?How to get rid of greenhouse Geas”, pp.1-5,Allianz Knowledge Partnersite, 2008年2月10日取自:
http://knowledge.allianz.com/en/globalissues/energy_co2/co2_reduction/emission_trade_or_tax.html
23. 無名氏,”Air Transport portal of the European Commission Traffic Management”, 2007年10月1日取自:
http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/traffic_management/sesame/index_eu.htm
24. 無名氏 (Junt,2007),“Analysis of the EC Proposalto Include Aviation Activities in the Emissions Trading Scheme”, Emst & Young – York Aviation,2007年11月10日取自:
http://files.aea.be/downloads/impact_assessment.pdf
25. 無名氏,”BA green scheme failed to take off””,2008年4月23日取自: http://news.bbc.co.uk/l/hi/uk_politics/6447229.stm
26. 無名氏, ”British Airways 2004/2005 Corporate Responsibility Report”; Foreword PP.1-2 ; Overview pp.1-3 ; Respecting the environment pp.1-5. 2008年4月26日 取自: http://www.britishairways.com/travel/corpresp05fwd/public/en_cn
27. 無名氏,“British Airways Launches Carbon Offset Scheme”, PP. 1-2, IEMA International news 072-Sep 15,2005,2008年4月23日取自:
http://iema.net/news/envnews?aid=6958
28. 無名氏 (Nov 2004),”Climate cooperation beyond 2012, Report on a Government assignment on future international climate cooperation”, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 5428.2007年11月2日取自:
http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/620-5428-7.pdf
29. 無名氏 (2006),”CSR case studys- British Airways”, Article 13 and CBI, 2008年4月20日取自:
http://www.article13.com/CBI/CBI_CSR_Case_Study_BA_March_06.pdf
30. 無名氏, ”Emissions Trading – What the UK Emissions Trading Scheme Has Taught Us”,Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affair (DEFRA),2008年4月10日取自: http://www.britischebotschaft.de/en/embassy/environment/presentation_emissions_trading.ppt#264,1,Emissions Trading
31. 無名氏,”Emission Trading Scheme”,2007年10月15日取自
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_trading
32. 無名氏,”EU clean air strategy”,2007年8月9日取自
http://envirovaluation.org/index.php/2005/10/14/p2152
33. 無名氏,”European Union Emission Trading Scheme”,2007年10月15 日取自: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Emission_trading_Sceme
34. 無名氏 (Mar/Apr 2006) ”flying further for less blended winglets and their benefits”, Airline Fleet & Maintenance Management,2007年10月28日取自:
http://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com/news/pdf/news/AF42_APB.pdf
35. 無名氏 (Feb/Mar 2008), “Fuel: how can we reduce consumption?” pp.40-43,Aircraft Commerce, Issue No. 56.
36. 無名氏, “Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in the EU25”,2008年7月18日取自:
http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2006_6/en/
37. 無名氏 (Feb 2007),”Guidance Emission Trading for Aviation”, ICAO CAEP 7th meeting presented by the ETTF Rapporteurs,2008年2月3日取自:
http://www.tc.gc.ca/AviationCivile/Internationale/OACI/comites/pdf/working/Jan-29-07/CAEP7_WP37.pdf
38. 無名氏 (2007) , “IPCC Global Warming Report”,American Library Publishers,2008年5月20日取自:
http://www.amlibpub.com/essays/ipcc-global-warming-report.html
39. 無名氏,ICAO Environmental Report 2007,2008年1月20日取自:
http://www.icao.int/icao/en/env/pubs/env_report_07.pdf
40. 無名氏,”Kyoto Protocol” 2007年 8月14日取自:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kyoto_protocol
41. 無名氏,”Nature: Agency Blocked hurricane report”,USA Today,2007年8月28日取自:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-27-hurricane-report_x.htm
42. 無名氏 (2007),”Policy options for mitigation in aviation”, prepared by CRA International.
43. 無名氏 (2007),”Report on Voluntary Emissions Trading for Aviation (VETS Report)”,2007年12月10日取自:
http://www.icao.int/env/vets_report.pdf
44. 無名氏,”Royal Commission Environmental Pollution – The Environmental Effects of Civil Aircraft in Flight”,2007年8月20日取自:
http://www.rcep.org.uk/aviation/av12-txt.pdf
45. 無名氏,”The Mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol: Emission Trading, the Clean Development Mechanism and Join Implementation”,2008年5月21日取自:
http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/mechanisms/items/1673.php
46. 無名氏,”UK Emission Trading Scheme”,2008年4月21日取自:
http://www.britischebotschaft.de/en/embassy/environment/emission_trading_scheme.htm
47. 無名氏,”What is Global Warming?”,National Geographic, 2007月7月20日取自: http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/environment/global-warming/gw-overview.html?
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
94932100
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094932100
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 溫肇東zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 葉清發zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 葉清發zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 09:31:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 09:31:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 09:31:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094932100en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34349-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94932100zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 2007年諾貝爾和平獎頒給了美國前副總統高爾和聯合國跨政府氣候變遷小組(IPCC),表揚他們致力於全球氣候變遷的議題。2005年2月「京都議定書」正式生效,目的在削減二氧化碳等六種溫室氣體的排放量,國際航空並未列在削減溫室氣體的範圍,但委由國際民航組織(ICAO)負責國際航空溫室氣體排放減量,這顯示在「聯合國氣候變化綱要公約(UNFCCC)」架構外,以產業合作模式來削減溫室氣體在政治上是可行的。飛機引擎將二氧化碳、氧化氮、碳氫化合物、水蒸氣、硫酸鹽、煙塵顆粒直接排放於大氣中,這些噴射物和大氣的成分產生複雜的化學變化,改變大氣的成分,所排放的高溫水氣在對流層凝結為飛行雲和卷雲,除二氧化碳確定會造成溫室效應外,其餘排放的廢氣尚缺乏科學證據和溫室效應有關。國際航空既有「京都議定書」不須限制溫室氣體排放的法律基礎,且大部分排放的廢氣尚缺乏影響溫室效應的科學證據以致航空產業對削減溫室氣體排放量的行動並不積極,但航空的旅客每年以約5%的速度成長,航空未來是廢氣排放增加最快的產業。在歐美國家積極進行大氣科學的研究以了解溫室效應的成因,台灣近日宣佈將加入全球最大的溫室效應氣體觀測平台MOZAIC,航空產業有必要採取負責的行動減緩溫室氣體排放量。
本研究主要蒐集國內外相關的學術研究資料,波音公司的環保政策及公司專業人員的意見,歸納出航空產業改善溫室效應的對策,並以英航為個案,探討其以排放交易體系及碳補償體系改善溫室氣體排放的實效來驗證其可行性,最後探討在ICAO架構下,航空產業如何循序漸進的進行溫室氣體減量的國際合作。本研究旨在回答下列問題:
1. 航空產業對溫室效應的影響?
2. 航空產業在科技面、營運操作面、經濟政策面可以減緩溫室氣體排放的對策有哪些?哪一個對策成本較低,較有效?
3. 航空產業相關的企業組織中,誰最適合做為溫室氣體排放負責的實體?
4. 以利害關係人的觀點,評估經濟政策面的解決方案在經濟面的衝擊為何?
5. 在ICAO的架構下如何進行航空產業溫室氣體減量的國際合作?
本研究得到的結論如下:
1. 經由航空科技的研發,是削減溫室氣體排放量的根本方法,因為它有利於所有利害關係人,但新一代的航空科技研發通常需要10-15年以上的時間,以及充滿不確定性,所以在短、中期不是削減溫室氣體排放的有效方法。
2. 改善航管系統及飛航操作的方法在法律、技術及經濟上所面臨的挑戰比較小,在短、中期就可以減少8-18%燃油的消耗,不過長期而言,不足以抵消航空產業每年成長所增加的廢氣排放量。
3. 排放交易體系是以市場機制運作的碳交易市場,航空產業在開放式的排放交易體系可用最低的減緩成本達到排放減量目標。排放交易體系經過英航實際運作證明它是可行的方法,既可以達到減量的目標又不會妨礙航空產業的成長。
4. ICAO是1944年依據芝加哥公約成立的,它的會員國適用”無差異原則”,聯合國氣候變化綱要公約(UNFCCC)的會員國適用”共同但有差異的責任”,所以京都議定書也只對Annex I的國家限制溫室氣體排放量。在會員國不同意單方面擴展排放交易體系下,ICAO要求在雙方同意下才能將他國的航班併到自己的排放交易體系,這使得歐盟在2012年企圖單方面擴展排放交易體系到所有進出歐盟的航班變得不大可能,這對歐盟積極推動溫室氣體減量的行動是一項挫折。
5. 飛機引擎所排放的廢氣,除二氧化碳確定會造成溫室效應外,其餘排放的廢氣尚缺乏科學證據會造成溫室效應。這種缺乏科學證據的氣候協商在國際間很難達成共識,所以在ICAO及IATA的排放交易體系都只建議限制二氧化碳的排放量,但二氧化碳只佔航空器排放廢氣的37%,這種溫室氣體的限制並不具環境的有效性。
6. 全球暖化已成為全球矚目的議題,各國紛紛採取「節能減碳」措施,台灣也不例外,京都議定書顯然不能有效解決溫室效應問題。在2012年後替代的新合約必定增加溫室氣體限制的國家及產業,也有可能包含航空產業。航空公司可以從參與碳補償體系、和政府簽署自願環保合約、參與其他產業的自願排放交易體系,先取得碳市場的交易經驗,日後可在UNFCCC或ICAO的架構下承諾溫室氣體排放減量。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In 2007, the Nobel Peace prize was awarded to the former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore and the IPCC for their great efforts in global climate change issue. The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on February 16, 2005; this treaty assigns mandatory emission limitations for the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) to the signatory nations. International aviation GHG emissions are not included in Kyoto Protocol, as it will be addressed through the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) according to Article 2.2 of the Kyoto Protocol. This indicates that it is politically agreed upon to use a sector-based approach to limit GHG emission beyond the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
During flight, aircraft engines emit carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, water vapor, hydrocarbons and particles. These emissions alter the chemical composition of the atmosphere in a variety of ways. Except for carbon dioxide, the other emissions from aircraft in flight are still under investigation for their impact on global climate change. Passenger airlines growth is anticipated to increase about 5% annually, so the aviation industry is expected to be the fastest growing emissions contributor in the future. Therefore, the aviation industry should take responsible actions to alleviate GHG emission. For exploring the root cause of global climate change, European and American scientists are leading the investigation of the atmosphere, and the government of Taiwan recently announced they will support MOZAIC in their observation of the north Pacific atmosphere.
This research is performed by reviewing the articles published by researchers, the briefing material from aircraft manufacturer and the expertise from companies. The conclusions are that the methods are useful to alleviate GHG emission for aviation industry. Meanwhile, British Airways was selected to be the case study to verify their implementation of environmental policy. Finally, an approach under ICAO is being introduced for the aviation industry to alleviate GHG emission through global collaboration. This study is to answer the following questions:
1. What is the environmental impact by the emissions from the aviation industry?
2. What methods are available from technology, flight operations and economic policies to alleviate GHG emission? Which one is more economic and effective?
3. Who is the accountable entity in the aviation industry to alleviate GHG emissions?
4. What is the impact on economics by the method of implementation of economic policies to alleviate GHG emissions based on the stakeholders’ viewpoints?
5. How does the aviation industry collaborate globally to alleviate GHG emissions under ICAO?
The conclusions from the research are as follows.
1. The basic method for the aviation industry to resolve GHG emissions is by the use of new fuel or engine technologies. Normally, it takes 10 to 15 years to pioneer new technologies for aviation with uncertainty, so it is not an effective method in short and mid term to alleviate GHG emissions.
2. The improvement of air traffic management and flight operation presents little difficulty in law, technologies and economics to alleviate GHG emissions. This method can reduce 8-18% of fuel comsumption in short and mid term, but it can not offset the growing emissions by air traffic annually.
3. The Aviation Industry can reach the lowest alleviation cost to meet emissions target by open emission trading scheme. Emission trading is not only environmentally effective, but also does not hinder the growth of aviation industry in the future.
4. The ICAO, the state members apply to the principle of non-discrimination, however the UNFCCC, the state members apply to the principle of common but differential responsibility. The Kyoto Protocol just restricts the GHG emissions for Annex I countries. ICAO is obliged to request the integration of foreign operators in the emission trading scheme “under a mutually agreed basis”.
5. Except for carbon dioxide, the other emissions from aircraft are under investigation for their impact on environment. The emission of carbon dioxide is only 37% of all emissions by aviation industry. The ICAO and IATA only recommend to restrict carbon dioxide emissions, so it is not environmentally effective.
6. The following treaty after 2012 should involve more countries and industries for GHG emission restriction, and the aviation industry might be involved in the new treaty. Therefore, airlines should seek the opportunity to participate voluntarily in the carbon trading market to gain experience in this strategy. Then, airlines can commit to reduce GHG emission under UNFCCC or IACO in the future.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景及動機……………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究目的及問題……………………………………………… 4
第三節 研究流程……………………………………………………… 5
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………………… 7
第一節 溫室效應的成因……………………………………………… 7
一、 溫室效應真的存在嗎?……………………………………… 9
第二節 航空產業對溫室效應的影響 ……………………………… 11
一、 航空氣排放廢氣的特性與成長………………………………16
第三節 航空油價飆漲對航空產業的衝擊……………………………17
第四節 全球氣候協商…………………………………………………23
第五節 京都議定書 ………………………………………………… 29
一、 京都機制 …………………………………………………… 31
第六節 2012年後全球氣候變遷的新協定架構…………………… 33
一、 國際氣候協商合約的架構……………………………………34
二、 國際氣候協商合約的標準……………………………………36
三、 2012年後京都議定書的替代架構 ………………………… 40
第七節 以產業為基礎的全球氣候變遷協定 ……………………… 47
一、 適合國際產業合作的條件……………………………………48
二、 產業合作的模式………………………………………………50
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………… 54
第一節 研究架構.…………………………………………………… 54
第二節 研究方法與步驟………………………………………………55
一、 研究分析的方法與步驟…………………………………… 56
第三節 個案選擇………………………………………………………57
第四節 研究限制………………………………………………………58
第四章 減緩航空產業溫室效應的改善對策 ………………………………59
第一節 飛機及引擎的製造研發………………………………………59
第二節 替代性燃油……………………………………………………61
一、 短期的解決方案………………………………………………62
二、 中期的解決方案………………………………………………62
三、 長期的解決方案………………………………………………63
第三節 改善航管系統及飛航操作……………………………………64
一、 飛航限制………………………………………………………64
二、 減少最低垂直分隔距離(RVSM)………………………………65
三、 歐盟Single European Sky 航管改善計畫 …………… 67
第四節 排放交易體系 …………………………………………………68
一、 排放交易體系主要設計成份………………………………… 69
二、 排放交易體系重要的成功因素……………………………… 72
三、 航空產業排放交易體系的負責實體………………………… 74
第五節 航空產業的排放交易體系………………………………… 76
一、 歐盟的航空產業環保政策…………………………………… 76
二、 歐盟排放交易體系…………………………………………… 76
三、 自願排放交易體系…………………………………………… 79
四、 碳補償體系 ……………………………………………………81
第六節 課徵碳稅……………………………………………………… 82
第七節 排放交易或課徵碳稅?……………………………………… 83
第五章 個案探討 – 英國航空公司…………………………………………87
第一節 公司背景 ………………………………………………………89
第二節 英航的環保政策 ……………………………………………91
第三節 英航的公司社會責任 ……………………………………… 95
第四節 UK 排放交易體系 ……………………………………………96
第五節 英航參與UK 排放交易體系的專案報告……………………100
第六節 英航自願碳補償體系…………………………………………102
第七節 研究發現………………………………………………………103
第六章 以利害關係人觀點評估經濟政策面改善方案…………………… 105
第一節 以利害關係人觀點評估歐盟排放交易體系…………………105
第二節 以利害關係人觀點評估自願排放交易體系…………………113
第三節 以利害關係人觀點評估課徵碳稅……………………………114
第四節 小結……………………………………………………………116
第七章 航空產業溫室氣體排放的國際合作……………………………… 117
第一節 國際民航組織與國際航空溫室氣體排放……………………117
第二節 航空科技研發與製造…………………………………………119
第三節 改善航管系統與飛航操作……………………………………121
第四節 排放交易體系指導書…………………………………………122
第五節 自願排放交易體系……………………………………………125
第六節 ICAO主導國際航空溫室氣體排放的兩難 …………………126
第七節 IATA對國際航空溫室氣體排放減量的策略……………… 129
第八章 結論與建議………………………………………………………… 132
第一節 研究結論 …………………………………………………… 132
第二節 對政府及航空公司的建議 ………………………………… 136
第三節 研究建議 …………………………………………………… 142
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………145
中文部份………………………………………………………………145
英文部分………………………………………………………………146
圖目錄
圖 1-1 1850-2007年的地表溫度變化趨勢圖………………………………… 2
圖 1-2 研究流程 ……………………………………………………………… 6
圖 2-1 1880-1970年地表溫度變化圖 ……………………………………… 10
圖 2-2 全球經濟與航空交通趨勢圖(1960-2005)………………………… 14
圖 2-3 03 Jan – 07 Sep每桶原油及航空用油的價格變化 ………… 18
圖 2-4 1996-2006年航空旅客的需求成長高於燃油消耗量的成長…………20
圖 2-5 1986-2006年新機的採購量 ………………………………………… 22
圖 2-6 為國際氣候協商合約的架構及主要成分 …………………………… 35
圖 3-1 研究架構 ……………………………………………………………… 55
圖 4-1 科技創新時課徵碳稅與排放交易減少的排放量 …………………… 85
圖 4-2 科技創新時碳稅與排放交易減少排放量的成本 …………………… 86
圖 5-1 英航在機場排放的氧化氮 …………………………………………… 93
圖 6-1 歐盟航空產業排放額度及競標的分配比例 ……………………… 110
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 50931 bytes-
dc.format.extent 81580 bytes-
dc.format.extent 106516 bytes-
dc.format.extent 50547 bytes-
dc.format.extent 97083 bytes-
dc.format.extent 176205 bytes-
dc.format.extent 574807 bytes-
dc.format.extent 129922 bytes-
dc.format.extent 258720 bytes-
dc.format.extent 214202 bytes-
dc.format.extent 175128 bytes-
dc.format.extent 186995 bytes-
dc.format.extent 176243 bytes-
dc.format.extent 120744 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094932100en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 溫室效應zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 航空產業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 排放交易zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際合作zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 航空產業對溫室效應的影響與改善對策zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 朱淑娟報導,6月20日聯合報,”環保署:買賣碳權要先建立制度”.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 李儒哲,”我國課徵碳稅可行性之評估(上)”,pp.1-7,”我國課徵碳稅可行性之評估(下)”,pp.1-7, 2007年11月26日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.taxresearch.org.tw/publishcation/specialtopic/topic_121.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. 高國珍報導,6月3日聯合報,”監控全球溫室效應 台灣加入”.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. 彭浩偉 (2007),”歐盟擬將民航機納入碳管制 美帶頭嗆聲”,pp.154-155,商業周刊1038期.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. 楊少強 (2007),”未來溫度未必會上升”,pp.104,商業周刊1015期.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. 蔡勳雄 (2008),”台灣地區因應地球暖化之能源政策”,2008年6月30日取自:http://www.lib.tut.edu.tw/lecture_siew/970512/siew13.pptzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. 魏國棟,”氣候變遷與因應經濟政策工具:文獻回顧”,pp.1-58,2007年11月5日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.ntpu.edu.tw/econ/TEI/Ejournal/39.1/390102.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. 無名氏 (2007),”經濟蝴蝶效應”,pp.100-106,商業周刊1013期.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. 無名氏 (2007),”新能源投資成效繫於各國碳價水準”, pp.142-144,商業周刊1020期.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Aimee Turner, David Learmount (2007),”Environment Special report: Green Wars;Cost of Waiting”, Flight International ,pp.24-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Andrew Sentence (2003),”Address climate change – the way ahead for aviation”,2008年4月30取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.heathrowairport.com/assets/B2CPortal/Static%20Files/AndrewSentance13October03.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Anne Paylor (Feb.2007),”A Fair Trade?”,Air Transport World(ATW), pp.40-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Anthony Concil (2007),”Key Priorities for Developing next Generation ATM systems”,2008年3月10日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www1.iata.org/pressroom/speeches/2007-02-13-01zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Arthur Andersen (2001),”Emissions trading for Aviation”,pp. 1-42,2008年5月5日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.iata.org/NR/ContentConnector/CS2000/Siteinterface/sites/mgr/file/final_report.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Ben Van Houtte (2004),“The Single European Sky”,Skyway 32, 2008年12月17日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.eurocontrol.int/epr/gallery/content/public/docs/sky_spr_p08.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Bertram Spector (Apr 1992),”International Environmental Negotiation: Insights for Practice, Executive Report (ER-21)”, International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA),2007年 10月30日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/ER-92-021.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Brendan Sobie (Jul 2008),”Air France steps up eco drive”,Airline Business.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Brian Pearce, Chief Economist,”2007 marks the peak of the cycle – the outlook has become more challenging”,IATA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. David Daggett, Gerhard Seidel, Robert McKinley, Robert Plencner (2001),”Airplane Technologies to Reduce Jet Fuel Use”, SAE World Aviation Congress, Document No.:2001-01-2985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. David Daggett, Robert Hendricks, Rainer Walther, Edwin Corporam (2007),”Alternate Fuels for use in Commercial Aircraft”, The Boeing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Giovanni Bisignani,”IATA industry-wide strategy to address climate change”,IATA, 2008年4月23日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.iata.org/NR/rdonlyres/80F7AA1C-2CE1-40B0-A2D5-C9AE38259AC2/0/4153400Climatechangeflyer4.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Guy Norris, Geoffey Thomas, Mark Wagner, and Christine Forbes Smith, “Boeing 787 Dreamliner – flying redefined”, pp.42-43, pp.50-52, The Boeing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. James Randall Kahn and Dina Franceschi (2005),”Beyond Kyoto: A tax-based system for the global reduction of greenhouse gas emissions”, pp. 1-9, Ecological Economics,2007年12月26日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.greeneconomics.net/ClimateTax.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Kati Kulovesi & Katja Keinanen,“Long-term climate policy:internation Legal aspects of a sector-based approach”, pp.1-14, 2008年2月5日取自: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=29397&lan=fizh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Kevin Baumert, Timothy Herzog and Jonathan Pershing,”Navigating the numbers:Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy”,pp.1-67,pp.110-119, World Resources Institute, 2007年12月1日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://archive.wri.org/publication_detail.cfm?pubid=4093zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Mike Hung, Engineering and Maintenance Division of EVA,”Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum”, Engineering and Maintenance Division of EVA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Peter Gwynne (Apr 1975),“The Cooling World”,Newsweek,2008年5 月29日取自: http://www.denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. Per Noren (2008),”Boeing Environmental Strategy”, The Boeing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Phil Chapman (Apr 2008),“Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age comth”,PP.1-2, 2008年5月29日取自: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23583376-7583,00.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Tale/artikkel (Apr 2007), “No reason for international aviation and maritime transport to be excluded from a new climate regime”, 2008年7月17日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/md/dep/politisk_ledelse/Tidligere-statssekretarer-og-radgivere/Henriette_Westhrin/taler_artikler/2007/--No-reason-for-international-aviation-a.html?id=484638zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. Thilo Kunzemann (2007),”Trade or Tax?How to get rid of greenhouse Geas”, pp.1-5,Allianz Knowledge Partnersite, 2008年2月10日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://knowledge.allianz.com/en/globalissues/energy_co2/co2_reduction/emission_trade_or_tax.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. 無名氏,”Air Transport portal of the European Commission Traffic Management”, 2007年10月1日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/traffic_management/sesame/index_eu.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. 無名氏 (Junt,2007),“Analysis of the EC Proposalto Include Aviation Activities in the Emissions Trading Scheme”, Emst & Young – York Aviation,2007年11月10日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://files.aea.be/downloads/impact_assessment.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. 無名氏,”BA green scheme failed to take off””,2008年4月23日取自: http://news.bbc.co.uk/l/hi/uk_politics/6447229.stmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. 無名氏, ”British Airways 2004/2005 Corporate Responsibility Report”; Foreword PP.1-2 ; Overview pp.1-3 ; Respecting the environment pp.1-5. 2008年4月26日 取自: http://www.britishairways.com/travel/corpresp05fwd/public/en_cnzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. 無名氏,“British Airways Launches Carbon Offset Scheme”, PP. 1-2, IEMA International news 072-Sep 15,2005,2008年4月23日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://iema.net/news/envnews?aid=6958zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. 無名氏 (Nov 2004),”Climate cooperation beyond 2012, Report on a Government assignment on future international climate cooperation”, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 5428.2007年11月2日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/620-5428-7.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. 無名氏 (2006),”CSR case studys- British Airways”, Article 13 and CBI, 2008年4月20日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.article13.com/CBI/CBI_CSR_Case_Study_BA_March_06.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. 無名氏, ”Emissions Trading – What the UK Emissions Trading Scheme Has Taught Us”,Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affair (DEFRA),2008年4月10日取自: http://www.britischebotschaft.de/en/embassy/environment/presentation_emissions_trading.ppt#264,1,Emissions Tradingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31. 無名氏,”Emission Trading Scheme”,2007年10月15日取自zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_tradingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32. 無名氏,”EU clean air strategy”,2007年8月9日取自zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://envirovaluation.org/index.php/2005/10/14/p2152zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33. 無名氏,”European Union Emission Trading Scheme”,2007年10月15 日取自: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Emission_trading_Scemezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34. 無名氏 (Mar/Apr 2006) ”flying further for less blended winglets and their benefits”, Airline Fleet & Maintenance Management,2007年10月28日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com/news/pdf/news/AF42_APB.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35. 無名氏 (Feb/Mar 2008), “Fuel: how can we reduce consumption?” pp.40-43,Aircraft Commerce, Issue No. 56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36. 無名氏, “Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in the EU25”,2008年7月18日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2006_6/en/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37. 無名氏 (Feb 2007),”Guidance Emission Trading for Aviation”, ICAO CAEP 7th meeting presented by the ETTF Rapporteurs,2008年2月3日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.tc.gc.ca/AviationCivile/Internationale/OACI/comites/pdf/working/Jan-29-07/CAEP7_WP37.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38. 無名氏 (2007) , “IPCC Global Warming Report”,American Library Publishers,2008年5月20日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.amlibpub.com/essays/ipcc-global-warming-report.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39. 無名氏,ICAO Environmental Report 2007,2008年1月20日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.icao.int/icao/en/env/pubs/env_report_07.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40. 無名氏,”Kyoto Protocol” 2007年 8月14日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kyoto_protocolzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41. 無名氏,”Nature: Agency Blocked hurricane report”,USA Today,2007年8月28日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-27-hurricane-report_x.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42. 無名氏 (2007),”Policy options for mitigation in aviation”, prepared by CRA International.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43. 無名氏 (2007),”Report on Voluntary Emissions Trading for Aviation (VETS Report)”,2007年12月10日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.icao.int/env/vets_report.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44. 無名氏,”Royal Commission Environmental Pollution – The Environmental Effects of Civil Aircraft in Flight”,2007年8月20日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.rcep.org.uk/aviation/av12-txt.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45. 無名氏,”The Mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol: Emission Trading, the Clean Development Mechanism and Join Implementation”,2008年5月21日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/mechanisms/items/1673.phpzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46. 無名氏,”UK Emission Trading Scheme”,2008年4月21日取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.britischebotschaft.de/en/embassy/environment/emission_trading_scheme.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47. 無名氏,”What is Global Warming?”,National Geographic, 2007月7月20日取自: http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/environment/global-warming/gw-overview.html?zh_TW