| dc.contributor.advisor | 成之約 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 高鳳詩 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 高鳳詩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2006 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 10:17:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 10:17:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 10:17:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0093262003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34443 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 勞工研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93262003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 無論是產業結構或是企業的經營型態,在全球化趨勢的蔓延下,「變」是唯一不變的法則。企業為了全心發展核心工作,其他非核心事業則以外包或承攬方式委外代工。因此,勞動市場上出現許多「非典型工作型態」,其中又以「派遣勞動」最受矚目。除了企業外,政府部門由於資源、預算的限制,許多單位開始遇缺不補,改以約聘僱、派遣勞動等方式來因應業務需求。即使派遣勞動帶來諸多的便利性,卻也因派遣特殊的工作型態使得大眾對派遣勞動產生疑慮。例如:短期契約型式、僱用不安定、缺乏福利、與正職員工間的關係等等,在這些特殊的工作特性下是否會影響派遣勞動者組織承諾的認知,乃引發本研究探討之動機。基於此,本研究以工作特性為前置變項,探討派遣勞動工作特性與組織承諾間的相關性,且提出下列各研究假設,假設一:派遣勞動者的個人特質對工作特性之知覺有差異。假設二:派遣勞動者的個人特質對要派單位之組織承諾有差異。假設三:派遣勞動者的個人特質對派遣公司之組織承諾有差異。假設四:派遣勞動者工作特性對要派單位之組織承諾有差異。假設五:派遣勞動者工作特性對派遣公司之組織承諾有差異。 本研究透過問卷調查的方式進行實證研究,經由統計分析之後,歸納出下列重要的研究結論:一、派遣勞動者對派遣工作特性的接受度達六成左右,且個人特性會影響對派遣工作特性的認知。二、派遣勞動者對要派單位、派遣公司之組織承諾仍有一定程度的認同感,且個人特性對要派單位、派遣公司的組織承諾具差異性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I國立政治大學研究所碩士論文提要 II目錄 IV表目次 VI圖目次 VIII第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的 6第三節 研究方法 7第四節 研究範圍與限制 9第二章 組織承諾 11第一節 組織承諾之概念 11第二節 影響組織承諾的因果變項 18第三節 本章小結 28第三章 派遣勞動與組織承諾 30第一節 派遣勞動之態樣 30第二節 派遣勞動特殊性 38第三節 派遣勞動組織承諾之相關研究 42第四節 本章小結 45第四章 問卷調查設計與結果分析 48第一節 問卷調查設計 48第二節 樣本分析 52第三節 敘述性分析 59第四節 各變項之相關分析 66第五節 本章小結 82第五章 結論與建議 85第一節 結論 85第二節 建議 92參考文獻 97一、中文部分 97二、英文部分 100附錄 105 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 200569 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 137703 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 138949 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 208718 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 218687 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 255876 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 235688 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 277070 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 220182 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 268421 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093262003 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 派遣勞動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 工作特性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 組織承諾 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 政府部門派遣勞工組織承諾之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2005派遣趨勢調查,30雜誌,2005年04月。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 丁虹(民76),企業文化與組織承諾之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 丁淑華(民89),民營化變革認知與離職意願關係之研究-以中華電信員工為例,國立中山大學人力資管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 方俊儒(2000),領導行為、工作特性與工作滿足關係之探討,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 尹衍樑(民77),變革認知策略對組織承諾之影響研究-以潤泰工業股份有限公司電腦化為例,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 西谷敏,協田滋著(1994),日本派遣勞動之法律與實務,勞動旬報社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 成之約(1998),淺論「派遣勞動」及其對勞資關係的影響,就業與訓練,十六卷六期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 成之約(1998),我國勞動派遣法草案,行政院勞工委員會委託研擬,台北。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 成之約(1999),淺論非典型僱用關係工作型態的發展與影響,勞工行政。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 成之約(2000),因應政府組織再造與人力精簡政策:「派遣勞動」運用的探討,公務人員月刊,33。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 成之約(2000),「派遣勞動」及其對勞資關係與人力資源管理之意涵與因應,空大行政學報,第10期,1-26。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李元隆(2000),台灣人才派遣業現況之研究—以日本人才派遣業為比較基礎,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李來希(1995),談派遣勞動之理法規範,勞工行政,第87期,52-56。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱駿彥(1998),淺談勞動派遣法律問題,萬國法律,第98期,11-26。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱駿彥(2000),勞工派遣法制之研究—以日本勞工派遣法為例。台灣勞動法學會報,第一期,9-15。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳若萱(2001),派遣勞動如何重塑雇傭關係與企業用人政策,經濟前瞻,第76期,頁101-106。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林宜珍(2002),工作特性、管理模式與工作滿足、組織承諾關係之研究—以流通業個案為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 祝康偉(2006),派遣員工與正職員工在組織承諾、工作投入差異之分析—以福利措施條件為干擾變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 侯堂柱(民90),轉換型領導、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關係-以台灣電子業為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫茄綾(2000),人力派遣的利基,管理雜誌,第320期,頁76-79。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曹采華(2001),員工特徵對工作滿意、組織承諾、組織公民行為、工作績效的影響—以派遣人員為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳忠謙(民84),企業主管領導型態與員工溝通及組織承諾之關係研究-以台灣石化業為例,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳昭偉(2002),政府機關人員組織承諾影響因素之研究—以嘉義縣政府為例,國立中正大學政治研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳湘琬(2003),教師人格特質、工作特性、工作滿足、組織承諾與離職傾向相關性之研究-以南部地區為例,義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳維岳(2004),工作特性、工作滿意與組織承諾之關聯性研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳彰儀(1995),組織心理學。台北市:心理出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊通軒(1998),勞動派遣立法必要性之研究,全國律師,第二卷,第七期,33-41。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馮飛燿(2002),派遣勞動產生之問題與因應對策之研究,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃國隆 (1982),領導方式、工作特性、成就動機、內外控、專斷性與教師工作滿足之關係。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,5 期,47–76 。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃越欽(2002),勞動法新論,翰蘆出版社,頁590。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃開義 (1984)。工作特性、個人特質、領導型態、工滿足與組織承諾對離職意願之影響,中原大學機械工程研究所碩士學位論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖思先(民87),轉換型領導、組織承諾與組織公民行為之相關研究-以台灣公立美術館為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉富美(2004),工作特性與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究-以宜蘭縣鄉鎮市公所為例,佛光大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉曉盈(2005),派遣勞工工作角色身份對組織承諾的影響,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡盛明(2003),公營事業工作價值觀、工作特性、員工屬性與組織承諾之關聯性研究─以中國石油公司為實證對象,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡博全,民88,國內人力派遣業制度運作及人力資源管理實務之探討─以美國相關產業為對比,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭津津(2000),派遣勞動相關法律問題之探討,就業與訓練,第16期,12-16。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭津津(2000),「美國勞動派遣法制之研究」,收錄於台灣勞動法學會編,勞動派遣法制之研究,頁123-150,台北:台灣勞動法學會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Akyeampong, E.B.(1989). The change face of temporary help. Perspective,9,43-48. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allan, P., Sienko, S.(1998). “Job motivation of professional and technical contingent workers: Are they different from permanent workers? ” Journal of Employment Counseling, Vol.35,pp.169-178. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empiric assessment of organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1–14. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bishop,J.W., Goldsby,M.G.,& Neck, C.P.(2002).Who goes?Who cares? | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Who stays?Who wants to?The role of contingent workers and corporate layoff practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology,17(4),298-315. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Buchanan, B. (1974), Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Managers in Work Organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carrel, M., Elbert, N., & Hatfield, R.(1995). Human Resource Management (5th ed.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clarke,O.(1992).Employment adjustment:An international perspective, In K. Koshiro(Ed.),Employment Security and Labor Market Flexibility,222-230. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ferris, K.R., & Aranya, N.A. (1983), A Comparison of Two Organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Commitment Scale. Personnel Psychology, 36: 87-99. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gallagher,D.G.(1999).Part-time employment and the work. In I.U. Zeytinoglu(Ed.),Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Glisson,C. and Durick,M.(1988 ).〝Predictors of Job Satisfaction and Organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Commitment in Human Resource Organizations 〞,Administrative | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Quarterly,Vol.33,pp.61-81. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gomez-Mejia, L.R.,Balkin,D.B., Cardy, R.L.(1995). Managing Human Resource, Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hackman, J.R. & Lawler, E.E. (l971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 250–279. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1975), Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2): 159-70. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1976), Motivation Through the Design of work: test | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of a theory. Organizational behavior and Human Performance, 1976(Aug.): | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 250-79. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Herbiniak, L. G., & Alluto, J. A. (1972), Personal and Role-Related Factors in the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Development of Organizational Commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17,555-572. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and The Nature for Man. New York :World. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hoffmann, Edeltraud & Ulrich Walwei.(2000). “The change in work arrangement in Denmark and Germany:erosion or renaissance of standard?” Conference on Nonstandard Work Arrangements in Japan, Europe, and the United States, P.24. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | John L. Valentino, The Impact of the Temporary Employee on the Employer-Employee Relationship. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: Study of commitment | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | mechanisms in utopian commitment. American Sociological Review, 33, 499–517. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D. (1990), A Review of Meta-analysis of the Antecedents, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Correlates and Consequences of Organizational Commitment. Psychological | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bulletin, 108(2): 171-94. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991), A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 1(1), pp. 61-89. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mir, A., Mir, R., & Mosca, J.B.(2002). The new age employee: An Exploration of changing employee- organization relations. Public Personnel Management, 31(2), 187-200. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morris,J.H. and Sherman,J.D.,(1981 ).〝Generalizability of Organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Commitment Model 〞,Academy of Management Journal, 24(3),pp.512-526. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mowday, R.T., & Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982), Employee-Organization | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | linkage, New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organ, D. W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Solider Syndrome.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parker, R. 1994. Flesh peddles and warm bodies:the temporary help industry and its workers, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. & Mowday, R. T. & Boulian, P. V. (1974). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5): 603-609. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Randall, R.T. (1987), Commitment and the Organization: The Organization Man Revisited. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12 (3), pp. 460-471. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reichers, A. E. (1985), A Review and Reconceptualization of Organization | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Commitment , Academy of Management Review,10(3),pp.456-76. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Remmel, R.J.(1997). Understanding Conflict and War. London:Sage Publications, Inc. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Richard S. Belous, The Rise of the Contingent Work Force: The Key Challenges and Opportunities, 52 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 863, 84 (1995). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Robbins, S. P. (1983), Organizational Behavior Concepts, Controversies, and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Applications. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall Inc. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Robbins, S. P. (1991). Organizational Behavior (5th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salancik, G. R. (1977), New Directions in Organizational Behavior, Chicago: St. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clair Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Seashore, S.E., & Taber, T.D. (1975), Job Satisfaction and Their Correlation. American Behavior & Scientist, 18: 346-68. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Segal, L. M., & Sullivan, D. G. 1997. The growth of temporary services work. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2):117-136. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sheldon, Z. (1971). Problems with the Use of ‘Moderator’ Variables. Psychological | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bulletin, 76, 295–310. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Staw,B.M.(1977 ). 〝Two Side of Commitment 〞,Paper Presented at the National | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Meeting of the Academy of Management,Orlando,Florida. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Steers, R.M. (1977), Antecedents and Outcomes of Organization Commitment. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 46-56. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Steven, J.M.,Beyer, J.M. and Trice, H.M.(1978 ).Assessing Personal, Role and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organization Predictors of Managerial Commitment, Academy of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management Journal,Vol.21 (1 ),pp.382. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Storrie , Donald.2002.Temporary agency work in the European Union. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, p.1. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Taylor, D. (1999). Managing Job Satisfaction. Australian CPA, 69(9), 46–59. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Turner, A. N., & Lawrence, P. R.(1965 ), Industrial Jobs and the Worker. Boston: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vosko, L.F.(1998). Regulating precariousness?The temporary employment relationship under the NAFTA and the EC Treaty. Industrial Relations.53(1),123-154. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wiener, Y. (1982), Commitment In Organization: A Normative View, Academy of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management Review, 7, 418-428. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | William(1998),They Serve Two Masters, HR Magazine,33. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Whyte, W.(1965), The Organization Man, Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books. | zh_TW |