| dc.contributor.advisor | 熊瑞梅 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 柯佩均 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Ko, Pei Chun | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 柯佩均 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Ko, Pei Chun | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 10:47:41 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 10:47:41 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 10:47:41 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095254003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34635 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95254003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 世界各國政府在知識經濟的潮流之下更加重視本土學術研究的品質，各國投注資源以提升學術研究水準、促進學術社群的國際化。台灣順應此種趨勢，近年制定各種學術政策與評鑑計畫，其中推動學術社群的知識生產品質，是國家政策中既定的一項重點目標。台灣社會學門的知識生產也受到國家施政方向的影響，國家科學委員會於 1997、2001與2006年執行三波的社會學門專業期刊排序計畫，針對社會學門的學術期刊進行評比。本研究著眼於此種學術場域的改變，將主要的研究關懷聚焦在學術社群的知識變遷；回顧科學社會學的研究傳統，引用行為是探查學社群知識生產的重要指標，引用代表學術知識傳遞與溝通的情形；而近年社會網絡分析（Social Network Analysis） 研究的興起，更擴充知識引用的研究方式與概念，採以引用網絡（Citation Networks） 分析知識結構與社群互動行為。本研究立基於社會網絡的研究概念，利用網絡分析工具試圖捕捉當代台灣社會學知識引用結構的現狀；社會學門的知識引用結構；究竟學術知識的引用會有何種變遷？引用的機制為何？本研究採用2007年第三波社會學門專業期刊排序資料，進行次級資料分析，研究問題環繞在2001~2006年引用網絡結構的多層次架構，開展出三項研究問題： （一）社會學門學術期刊引用網絡的現況，互引網絡結構的動態變化為何？（二）社會學門內部學者引用期刊的情形為何？社會學門各類型期刊的引用變遷又如何？（三）以社會學門期刊引用的產生是偏向於以內容為主的規範論或符合以社會關係為主的建構論的機制？研究結果分成三部份。第一，在期刊對期刊引用網絡層次部份，顯示學術期刊的引用網絡結構朝向集中化的趨勢，《台灣社會學》、《台灣社會學刊》成為引用結構中主要被引用的學術期刊組織，而且成為引用網絡結構中優勢地位的引用副團體。第二，社會學門學者引用學術期刊的雙元網絡層次，顯示社會學者與社會福利、社會工作學者的引用分流；社會學專業期刊與社會工作專業期刊的引用也存在著分流的情形。最後，《台灣社會學》、《台灣社會學刊》與《台灣社會研究季刊》的社會學者引用機制為內容為主的規範論。此三項結果顯示期刊排序制度施行社會學門的學術期刊，特定學術期刊的學術論文被其他期刊所肯定，產生引用結構的集中化變遷，同時社會學者與社會福利、社會工作學者對學科專業期刊分流引用也逐漸成形。而三種學術期刊內，社會學者的引用網絡影響來自於學者專長的相同與否，更是為台灣社會學的知識引用現狀，提出一個解釋的答案。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Abstract In recent years, as the world has been trending toward a Knowledge-based Economy, governments worldwide have recognized the importance of academic research, providing resources to upgrade the academic research level in order to internationalize scholarly pursuit. Taiwan, as a latecomer to the concept of Knowledge-based Economy, has begun to constitute science and social science rules and evaluations for academic development.The study intends to capture the transformation of the academic field by examining citations. In early works in the science of sociology, citation was an important indication of scholarly productivity. Social network analysis (SNA) enriches the methodology, and makes the indication to the idea of citation networks. Based on the perspective of SNA, the study investigates the citation network database of sociological journals between 2001 and 2006, and the concurrent citation networks of sociologists from three prior sociological journals.The results include three parts: first, the structure of journals` citation networks shows the trend of centralization, and two academic journals attain privileged status by means of structural equivalence. Second, the dual network of authors and journals demonstrate the citation divisions of sociologists and social workers. The sociological professional journals and social worker professional journals also are divided by time. Finally, the citation mechanism of sociologists verifies the normative pattern. In conclusion, the analysis confirms the impact of social science policy, which influences the centralization of citation networks and the advantageous status of specific sociological journals. The sociologists` citation networks are related to the specialty similarities of scholars, not the social relations. The study gives a pioneer explanation of citation networks of Taiwanese sociology. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯1第一節 研究動機⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯1第二節 研究問題⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯3第二章 文獻回顧⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯5第一節 學術期刊評鑑制度的形成與知識生產的關係⋯5第二節 學術期刊引用網絡與雙元網絡的變遷⋯⋯⋯⋯10第三節 社會學者論文引用機制⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯14第三章 研究方法⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯18第一節 資料來源與資料結構⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯18第二節 研究架構與研究假設⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯24第三節 分析方法⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯29第四章 社會學門期刊間知識引用網絡的變遷⋯⋯34第一節 社會學門期刊在整體知識網絡上的份量⋯⋯⋯36第二節 社會學門學術期刊引用連結網絡的變遷⋯⋯⋯40第三節 社會學門學術期刊引用結構位置的轉變⋯⋯⋯51第四節 小結：位居結構中心性的期刊副團體⋯⋯⋯⋯58第五章 作者引用期刊的雙元網絡分析⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯61第一節 社會學者與社會工作學者的引用連結分流⋯⋯62第二節 期刊被社學和社工學者引用的分流趨勢⋯⋯⋯72第三節 小結：知識引用結構的分流⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯76第六章 作者引用作者的網絡分析與影響機制⋯⋯79第一節 社會學門排名前三名期刊的引用網絡、相同機構網絡與相同專長網絡⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯81第二節 引用規範的機制⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯88第三節 小結：學術社群引用網絡的走向⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯92第七章 結論⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯95第一節 研究發現⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯97第二節 研究限制與後續的可能⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯102參考書目⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯106 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 53692 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 151741 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 102338 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 138347 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 6604317 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 183146 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095254003 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 期刊排序 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 社會網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 引用網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 社會學門學術期刊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 規範論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | social networks | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | structural equivalence | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | citation networks | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | sociological journals | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | normative | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 台灣社會學門的知識生產網絡機制：以2001~2006年社會學門學術期刊引用網絡為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 反思會議工作小組編（2005）全球化與知識生產。台北：群學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院國家科學委員會官方網站：http://web.nsc.gov.tw/default.asp 搜尋日期：2008年1月13日。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院國家科學委員會（1997）行政院國家科學委員會八十六年年報。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院國家科學委員會（2000）中華民國人文社會科學白皮書。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張苙雲（2005）「社會學熱門與前瞻計畫」的初步所見。人文與社會科學簡訊。8(4)：1-7。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉曉芬 (2000)我國大學教師資格審查制度之硏究。台北：國立政治大學教育硏究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賴鼎銘（2005）以國外幾種代表性的學術評鑑為例。見反思會議工作小組編，全球化與知識生產，頁31-66。台北：群學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 湯志傑（2005）「本土」社會學傳統的建構與重構：理念、傳承與實踐。見謝國雄編（出版中），群學爭鳴：台灣社會學發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 章英華（2000）學術出版、評審與學術發展：一個社會學家的參與觀察。台灣社會學刊 23：1-23。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 章英華、黃毅志、呂寶靜（2000）台灣地區社會學、社會福利與社會工作專業期刊排序。台灣社會學刊 23：103-139。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 章英華、黃毅志、余漢儀、羅文輝（2002）社會學門專業期刊排序。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曾孝明（2001）台灣的知識經濟：困境與迷思。台北：群學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉秀珍、陳寬政（1998）社會學與社會工作學術研究的現況與發展。台灣社會學刊 21：21-57。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉啟政（1995）社會學門的現況與發展—研討會紀錄。國科會專題研究成果報告，台灣大學社會學系執行。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | —（2001）社會學和本土化。台北：巨流圖書。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | —（2005a）觀念巴貝塔-當代社會學的迷思。台北：群學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | —（2005b）缺乏社會現實感的指標性評鑑迷思。見反思會議工作小組編，全球化與知識生產，頁111-126。台北：群學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 熊瑞梅（1995）社會網絡的資料蒐集、測量及分析。見章英華、傅仰止與瞿海源編，社會調查與分析，頁313-356。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 熊瑞梅、杜素豪、宋麗玉與黃懿慧（2007）社會學門專業期刊排序。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 瞿海源（1998）社會學課程內容與台灣社會研究。台灣社會學刊 21：1-20。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蘇國賢（2004）社會學知識的社會生產：台灣社會學者的隱形學群。台灣社會學 8︰133-192。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蕭新煌（1995）轉型的台灣社會學與轉型的台灣社會：個人的幾點觀察。中國社會學刊 18：1-15。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baldi, S. (1998) Normative versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model. American Sociological Review 63(6): 829-846. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Breiger, R. (1976) Career Attributes and Network Structure- A blockmdel study of a biomedical research speciality. American Sociological Review 41: 117-135. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burt, R. (1976) Positions in Networks. Social Forces 55(1): 93-122. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burt, R. (1978) Stratification and Prestige Among Elite Experts in Methodological and Mathematical Sociology Circa 1975. Social Networks 1: 105-158. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burt, R., and Doreian, P. (1982) Testing a Structural Model of Perception: Conformity and Deviance with Respect to journal Norms in Elite Sociological Methology. Quality and Quantity 16: 109-150. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cappell, C., and Guterbock, T. (1992) Visible Colleges: The Social and Conceptual Structure of Sociology Specialties. American Sociological Review 57: 266-273. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carrington, J., Scott, J., and Wasserman, S. (2005) Models and Methods in Social Networks Analysis, USA: Cambridge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carloan, V., (2008) The Structure of Education Research: The Multivocality in Promoting Cohesion in an article interlock networks. Social Networks 30:69-82. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clemens, E., Powell, W., Mcllwainw, K. and Okamoto, D. (1995) Careers in Print - Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations. American Journal of Sociology 101(2): 433-494. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cole, J and Cole, S. (1973) Social stratification in science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cole, S. (1983) The Hierarchy of the Sciences? The American Journal of Sociology 89(1): 111-139. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doreian, P. and Fararo, J. Thomas (1985) Structural Equivalence in a Journal Network. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36(1): 28-37. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., and Ferligoj, A. (2004) Generalized blockmodeling of two-mode network data. Social Networks 26(1): 29-53. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ennis, G. James (1992) The Social Organization of Sociological Knowledge: Modeling the Intersection of Specialties. American Sociological Review 57(2): 259-265. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Freeman, Linton C. (1979) Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Garfield, Eugene (1963) Citation Indexes in Sociological and Historical Research. American Documentation 14(4): 289-291. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanneman, Robert and Riddle, Mark (2005) Introduction to social network methods. (on-line version) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hargens, Lowell L. and Howard Schuman (1990) Citation Counts and Social Comparisons: Scientists` Use and Evaluations of Citation Index Data. Social Science Research 19: 205-221. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hargens, L. L. (2000) Using the Literature: Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship. American Sociological Review 65(6): 846-865. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kim, Hyo, Park, Han Woo, and Thelwall, Mike (2006) Comparing Academic Hyperlink Structures with Journal Publishing in Korea. Science Communication 27(4): 540-564. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leahey, Erin (2007) Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings. American Sociological Review 72: 533-561. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leydesdorff, L. (2004) Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation 60(4): 371-427. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leydesdorff, L. (2007) Betweenness Centrality as an Indicator of the Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(9): 1303-1319. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lazegaa Emmanuel, Jourdab Marie-The´ re" se , Mounierc Lise, Stoferd Rafae¨ (2008) Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks 30: 159-176. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Merton, K (1973) The Sociology of Science, USA: The University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Moody, J. (2004) The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplianry Cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Journal of Sociology 69: 213-238. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Negishi Masamitsu, Sun Yuan, Shigi Kunihiro (2004) Citation Database for Japanese Papers: A new bibliometric tool for Japanese academic society. Scientometrics 60(3): 333-351. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Park Han Woo and Leydesdorff Loet (2008) Korean Journals in the Science Citation index: What Do They Reveal About the Intellectual Structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3): 439-462. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Poldony Joel M. (1993). A Status- Based Model of Market Competition. The American Journal of Sociology 98(4): 829-872. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Podolny, J., Hannan M., and Stuart T. (1996). Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991. The American Journal of Sociology 102(3): 659-689. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Price, Derek J. de Solla (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science 149(3683): 510-515. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wassweman S. and Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, USA: Cambridge University. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | White, H. D., Wellman, B., and Nazer, N. (2004) Does Citation Reflect Social Structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(2): 111-126. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zhou and Leydesdorff, L. (2007) The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese Journals in Mathematics. Scientometrics 72(2): 185-200. | zh_TW |
