學術產出-Theses

題名 台灣垃圾強制分類政策的成效實證分析
作者 郭敏華
Kuo, Min-Hua
貢獻者 羅光達
郭敏華
Kuo, Min-Hua
關鍵詞 垃圾強制分類
差異中的差異
垃圾清運量
資源回收量
日期 2007
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 10:59:34 (UTC+8)
摘要 身為大量消費的現代人,不得不關切垃圾何去何從。以往垃圾問題源自於焚化或掩埋兩法皆會損耗大量的環境成本及引起利益團體抗爭,造成社會無謂的損失,受世界環保潮流影響,我國政府決定從降低垃圾量著手。
垃圾減量從垃圾分類做起,方便後續的資源回收。我國自民國94年1月1日起,強制台灣10個縣市的民眾進行垃圾分類,成為我國少數未全國同步施行的中央政策。本研究引進多用於公共衛生、醫療等自然實驗的計量方法—差異中的差異(Difference-in-Difference,簡稱DID)來探討屬於社會科學領域的政府政策,檢驗該政策是否達到其制訂之目標。
本研究將台灣第一階段便實施強制政策的10個縣市當作實驗組,4個第二階段才全面實施的縣市作為控制組,在控制了各縣市的平均每月家戶所得、高等教育程度、清運人員、垃圾車數量等變數後,分別去分析政策對每人每日垃圾清運量、每人每日資源回收量、每人每日資源回收量相對於垃圾清運量比例三者的影響,觀察政策對於降低垃圾清運量、提高資源回收量的政策目的是否有效。
結果發現,我國隨時間經過,垃圾清運量降低、資源回收量提高,但由於主要探討的政策係數並不顯著,所以我國垃圾清運、資源回收情形的改善,是否起因於強制垃圾分類政策造成,沒有明確證據。
Modern-day life consumes far greater resources than ever and, thus must be concerned about the “problems of trash.” Traditionally, government officials have adopted landfill and incineration policies to dispose of this municipal waste. Yet these two measures come with large social and environmental costs.
In keeping with international trends toward environmental protection, the Environmental Protection Administration of the Republic of China has decided to solve the problems by fundamentally reducing the volume of municipal waste. In order to decrease the volume of waste and increase the recycled, the first phase of the “Compulsory Trash-Sorting Policy” was implemented in 10 localities on Jan. 1, 2005, with additional counties brought on board in later phases. This policy is one of the few policies that are not implemented island-wide in Taiwan.
This study adopts the “Difference-in-Difference” approach—a popular research method in the field of public health, medical caring and natural sciences—to evaluate the effectiveness of this policy. The 10 counties where the first phase of the policy was successful is the “treatment group.” Another 4 counties where the second phase of policy was successful is the “control group.” This study takes into account monthly per family income, average level of higher education, number of street-sweepers and trash-haulers, and the trash trucks as the exogenous variables. This study calculates the changes in per capita daily volume of municipal waste and per capital daily volume of recycled materials to determine the success of the policy.
This study concludes that the volume of the municipal waste and increases the recycled materials decreases by time; however the actual effect is still vague because the coefficient of policy in this study remains insignificant. Therefore, it is only certain that the campaign for “trash-sorting” works better with time. No evident linkage exists between recycling and the “Compulsory Trash-Sorting Policy.”
參考文獻 一、政府出版品
行政院環境保護署(2003),《垃圾處理方案之檢討與展望》。
行政院環境保護署,《中華民國環境保護統計年報》,93~94年。
二、中文部分
劉翠溶(1999),論廢棄物資源回收制度的演進,臺灣社會問題研究學術研討會論文。
陳明雄(2004),《我國資源回收制度之檢討》,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
邱家範(2000),《高雄市家戶資源回收行為整合模式研究》,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
杜銘洲(2004),《環境政策執行過程之比較研究-以台北市及台中市垃圾清運為例》,東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
劉力旗(2005),《垃圾強制分類政策對垃圾資源回收分選廠設置效益探討研究-以花蓮縣北區廠為例》,國立中央大學環境工程研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
楊書銘(2001),《強制垃圾分類政策對民眾資源回收行為之影響評估》,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
李玉惠(1992),《台北市辦理垃圾分類、資源回收之功效評估-知識、態度、行為面分析》,台北市研考會。
林慧修(2002),《部分負擔對不同種類醫療服務之影響分析》,國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡淑鈴(2004),《醫療利用、死亡與失業:在經濟不景氣下之實証研究》,國立陽明大學公共衛生研究所博士論文。
謝春福(2004),《醫療給付效益提昇計劃前後馬祖地區民眾醫療利用與費用之分析》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
余珮琦(2003),《住院醫療服務市場之供給誘發需求現象探討》,國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
陳厚任(2004),《藥品部分負擔政策對癲癇病人之影響》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
張嘉珍(2002),《高診次部分負擔制度對高利用者門診利用之影響》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
吳時捷(2004),《實施門診合理量對區域級以上醫院門診利用與費用的影響》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
侯佳雯(2005),《「糖尿病醫療服務改善方案」試辦計畫對第二型糖尿病人醫療資源利用之影響》,臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
三、英文部分
Bertrand, Marianne, Duflo, Esther and Mullainathan, Sendhil (2004), “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? ”Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 119(1), 249-275.
Chung S. S., and C. S. Poon (2001), “A comparison of waste-reduction practices and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens”,
Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 3-19.
Card,D. and A.B. Krueger.(1994), “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania”, American Economic Review, 84,772-793.
Deborah Vaughn, Nestor., Podolsky, Michael J. (1998), “Assessing Incentive-
Based Environmental Policies for Reducing Household Waste Disposal ”,
Contemporary Economic Policy, 16, 401-411.
Eissa, N. (1995), “Taxation and Labor Supply of Married Women:The Tax Reform Act of 1986 as a Natural Experiment”, NBER Working Paper, NO.5023.
Fullerton, Don., and Thomas C. Kinnaman, (1997) “Garbage and Recycling in Communities with curbside Recycling and Unit-Based Pricing”, NBER Working Paper, NO. 6021.
Gruber,J. and P. James (1994), “Tax Incentives and the Decision to Purchase Health Insurance: Evidence from the Self-Employed” ,The Quarterly Journal of Economucs, 109(3),701-783.
Kaiser, Florian G., and Wolfing Sybille, Fuhrer Urs. (1999) “Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behavior”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.
Meyer, Bruce. D (1994), “Natural and Quasi-Experiment in Economics”, NBER Working Paper, NO.170.
Moffitt, Robert A. and Mark O. Wilhelm (2000), “Taxation and Labor Supply Decisions of the Affluent”, Joel Slemrod (ed.) Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich. ( Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Triest, Robert K. (1998), “Econometric Issues in Estimating the Behavioral Response to Taxation: A Nontechnical Introduction”, National Tax Journal, 51(4), 761-772.
四、網站
新竹市環保局資源回收網http://recycle.hccepb.gov.tw/news/news11.htm
中華門國統計資訊網http://61.60.106.82/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp
行政院環境保護署統計資料庫http://210.69.101.110/WEBSTATIS/webindex.htm
環境資訊中心http://e-info.org.tw/node/9310
美國環境保護局http://www.epa.gov/garbage/recycle.htm
德國聯邦環境署http://www.bmu.de/english/waste_management/doc/3432.php
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
94255017
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094255017
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 羅光達zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 郭敏華zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Kuo, Min-Huaen_US
dc.creator (作者) 郭敏華zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Kuo, Min-Huaen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 10:59:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 10:59:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 10:59:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094255017en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34714-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94255017zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 身為大量消費的現代人,不得不關切垃圾何去何從。以往垃圾問題源自於焚化或掩埋兩法皆會損耗大量的環境成本及引起利益團體抗爭,造成社會無謂的損失,受世界環保潮流影響,我國政府決定從降低垃圾量著手。
垃圾減量從垃圾分類做起,方便後續的資源回收。我國自民國94年1月1日起,強制台灣10個縣市的民眾進行垃圾分類,成為我國少數未全國同步施行的中央政策。本研究引進多用於公共衛生、醫療等自然實驗的計量方法—差異中的差異(Difference-in-Difference,簡稱DID)來探討屬於社會科學領域的政府政策,檢驗該政策是否達到其制訂之目標。
本研究將台灣第一階段便實施強制政策的10個縣市當作實驗組,4個第二階段才全面實施的縣市作為控制組,在控制了各縣市的平均每月家戶所得、高等教育程度、清運人員、垃圾車數量等變數後,分別去分析政策對每人每日垃圾清運量、每人每日資源回收量、每人每日資源回收量相對於垃圾清運量比例三者的影響,觀察政策對於降低垃圾清運量、提高資源回收量的政策目的是否有效。
結果發現,我國隨時間經過,垃圾清運量降低、資源回收量提高,但由於主要探討的政策係數並不顯著,所以我國垃圾清運、資源回收情形的改善,是否起因於強制垃圾分類政策造成,沒有明確證據。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Modern-day life consumes far greater resources than ever and, thus must be concerned about the “problems of trash.” Traditionally, government officials have adopted landfill and incineration policies to dispose of this municipal waste. Yet these two measures come with large social and environmental costs.
In keeping with international trends toward environmental protection, the Environmental Protection Administration of the Republic of China has decided to solve the problems by fundamentally reducing the volume of municipal waste. In order to decrease the volume of waste and increase the recycled, the first phase of the “Compulsory Trash-Sorting Policy” was implemented in 10 localities on Jan. 1, 2005, with additional counties brought on board in later phases. This policy is one of the few policies that are not implemented island-wide in Taiwan.
This study adopts the “Difference-in-Difference” approach—a popular research method in the field of public health, medical caring and natural sciences—to evaluate the effectiveness of this policy. The 10 counties where the first phase of the policy was successful is the “treatment group.” Another 4 counties where the second phase of policy was successful is the “control group.” This study takes into account monthly per family income, average level of higher education, number of street-sweepers and trash-haulers, and the trash trucks as the exogenous variables. This study calculates the changes in per capita daily volume of municipal waste and per capital daily volume of recycled materials to determine the success of the policy.
This study concludes that the volume of the municipal waste and increases the recycled materials decreases by time; however the actual effect is still vague because the coefficient of policy in this study remains insignificant. Therefore, it is only certain that the campaign for “trash-sorting” works better with time. No evident linkage exists between recycling and the “Compulsory Trash-Sorting Policy.”
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究方法 3
第四節 研究架構 4
第貳章 背景介紹 6
第一節 我國廢棄物管理政策之演變 6
第二節 其他先進國家的垃圾分類政策 11
第參章 文獻探討 19
第一節 強制垃圾分類文獻探討 19
第二節 DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCE文獻探討 21
第肆章 研究設計 29
第一節 研究方法說明-- DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCE 29
第二節 實證模型 32
第伍章 實證結果與說明 44
第陸章 結論與建議 47
參考文獻 51
附錄 55
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 48258 bytes-
dc.format.extent 84309 bytes-
dc.format.extent 74951 bytes-
dc.format.extent 111198 bytes-
dc.format.extent 144606 bytes-
dc.format.extent 207794 bytes-
dc.format.extent 179666 bytes-
dc.format.extent 197298 bytes-
dc.format.extent 93853 bytes-
dc.format.extent 115391 bytes-
dc.format.extent 105068 bytes-
dc.format.extent 56118 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094255017en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 垃圾強制分類zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 差異中的差異zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 垃圾清運量zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源回收量zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 台灣垃圾強制分類政策的成效實證分析zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、政府出版品zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院環境保護署(2003),《垃圾處理方案之檢討與展望》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院環境保護署,《中華民國環境保護統計年報》,93~94年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉翠溶(1999),論廢棄物資源回收制度的演進,臺灣社會問題研究學術研討會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳明雄(2004),《我國資源回收制度之檢討》,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱家範(2000),《高雄市家戶資源回收行為整合模式研究》,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 杜銘洲(2004),《環境政策執行過程之比較研究-以台北市及台中市垃圾清運為例》,東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉力旗(2005),《垃圾強制分類政策對垃圾資源回收分選廠設置效益探討研究-以花蓮縣北區廠為例》,國立中央大學環境工程研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊書銘(2001),《強制垃圾分類政策對民眾資源回收行為之影響評估》,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李玉惠(1992),《台北市辦理垃圾分類、資源回收之功效評估-知識、態度、行為面分析》,台北市研考會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林慧修(2002),《部分負擔對不同種類醫療服務之影響分析》,國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡淑鈴(2004),《醫療利用、死亡與失業:在經濟不景氣下之實証研究》,國立陽明大學公共衛生研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝春福(2004),《醫療給付效益提昇計劃前後馬祖地區民眾醫療利用與費用之分析》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 余珮琦(2003),《住院醫療服務市場之供給誘發需求現象探討》,國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳厚任(2004),《藥品部分負擔政策對癲癇病人之影響》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張嘉珍(2002),《高診次部分負擔制度對高利用者門診利用之影響》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳時捷(2004),《實施門診合理量對區域級以上醫院門診利用與費用的影響》,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 侯佳雯(2005),《「糖尿病醫療服務改善方案」試辦計畫對第二型糖尿病人醫療資源利用之影響》,臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bertrand, Marianne, Duflo, Esther and Mullainathan, Sendhil (2004), “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? ”Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 119(1), 249-275.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chung S. S., and C. S. Poon (2001), “A comparison of waste-reduction practices and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens”,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 3-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Card,D. and A.B. Krueger.(1994), “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania”, American Economic Review, 84,772-793.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deborah Vaughn, Nestor., Podolsky, Michael J. (1998), “Assessing Incentive-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Based Environmental Policies for Reducing Household Waste Disposal ”,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Contemporary Economic Policy, 16, 401-411.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eissa, N. (1995), “Taxation and Labor Supply of Married Women:The Tax Reform Act of 1986 as a Natural Experiment”, NBER Working Paper, NO.5023.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fullerton, Don., and Thomas C. Kinnaman, (1997) “Garbage and Recycling in Communities with curbside Recycling and Unit-Based Pricing”, NBER Working Paper, NO. 6021.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gruber,J. and P. James (1994), “Tax Incentives and the Decision to Purchase Health Insurance: Evidence from the Self-Employed” ,The Quarterly Journal of Economucs, 109(3),701-783.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaiser, Florian G., and Wolfing Sybille, Fuhrer Urs. (1999) “Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behavior”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meyer, Bruce. D (1994), “Natural and Quasi-Experiment in Economics”, NBER Working Paper, NO.170.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moffitt, Robert A. and Mark O. Wilhelm (2000), “Taxation and Labor Supply Decisions of the Affluent”, Joel Slemrod (ed.) Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich. ( Cambridge University Press, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Triest, Robert K. (1998), “Econometric Issues in Estimating the Behavioral Response to Taxation: A Nontechnical Introduction”, National Tax Journal, 51(4), 761-772.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 四、網站zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 新竹市環保局資源回收網http://recycle.hccepb.gov.tw/news/news11.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華門國統計資訊網http://61.60.106.82/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.aspzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院環境保護署統計資料庫http://210.69.101.110/WEBSTATIS/webindex.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 環境資訊中心http://e-info.org.tw/node/9310zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 美國環境保護局http://www.epa.gov/garbage/recycle.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 德國聯邦環境署http://www.bmu.de/english/waste_management/doc/3432.phpzh_TW