| dc.contributor.advisor | 張勝文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chang, Sheng Wen | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 王舒齡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Wang, Shu Ling | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 王舒齡 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wang, Shu Ling | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 11:01:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 11:01:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 11:01:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095255031 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34727 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 財政研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95255031 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文以Tiebout (1956) 之假說 (Tiebout Hypothesis) 為基礎，在數個轄區之經濟環境下，假設人民具有「異質性偏好」及「完全移動性」，利用模擬 (simulation) 的方式，探討人口以及地方公共財之最適配置狀況，並探討其背後所隱含之經濟意義。 本文之研究發現有以下三點。第一，對於公共財具有異質性偏好、且具有完全移動性時，個人會依據自我選擇機制 (self-selection)，選擇使其效用極大化之轄區居住，產生區分 (sorting) 之效果，符合Tiebout所預期。第二，就比較靜態發現，在技術水準越高，或者私有財之偏好越高的情況下，高偏好轄區的人口越多，每人持有消費性公共財數量也越多；而當資本產出彈性增加，則高偏好地區人口越少，且每人持有消費性公共財數量越少。第三，若中央政府徵單一稅 (uniform tax) ，且定額稅與資本稅之稅額相等，則以中央政府的角度觀之，不論何種稅制，均不影響全國地方公共財之總提供水準，故異質性偏好在此未造成任何影響。但若以地方政府的角度觀之，並以「每人持有公共財數量」之角度切入，則異質性偏好不但造成區分效果，更使轄區之資源配置具有脫離對稱均衡的可能。若將社會總福利水準極大化時之定額稅定義為最適稅率，其所對應之每人持有地方公共財，定義為公共財之最適提供水準，以此作為比較基礎，則在課徵資本稅之下，生產要素使用之扭曲性，影響人民之消費行為，進而改變轄區內原來的資源配置，強化轄區間資源配置的差異。在本文以兩個轄區為例，並以消費性公共財為分析重點之模型，發現地方公共財的提供，受到轄區內個人偏好強度差異之影響，出現偏好強度高之轄區公共財提供過多，偏好強度低之轄區公共財提供不足之結果。關鍵字：Tiebout、異質性偏好、完全流動性、自我選擇機制、區分效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究方法 2第三節 研究流程與架構 3第二章 文獻回顧 4第一節 Tiebout Model及其評論 5第二節 異質性偏好及區分機制之均衡 6第三節 地方分權與公共財之提供 7第四節 Tiebout假說在實證上之探討 9第三章 基本模型 11第一節 基本理論模型 11第二節 模擬分析之模型設定 17第三節 過渡動態 (Transitional Dynamics) 19第四章 模擬結果 23第一節 均衡解及其穩定性 23第二節 比較靜態分析 26第五章 模擬結果之探討 35第一節 公共財提供之最適水準 35第二節 本模型與Tiebout及Zodrow與Mieszkowski模型比較 39第六章 結論與建議 43第一節 結論 43第二節 研究建議 46參考文獻 48圖表目錄圖 4-1 定額稅與社會福利水準之關係-消費性公共財 30圖 4-2 資本稅與社會福利水準之關係-消費性公共財 30圖 4-3 動態分析-定額稅為15 31圖 4-4 動態分析-定額稅為18.19 31圖 4-5 動態分析-定額稅為18.895 32圖 4-6 動態分析-定額稅為20 32圖 5-2 效用水準及人口之配置 42表 4-1 定額稅模擬結果-消費性公共財 33表 4-2 資本稅模擬結果-消費性公共財 34表 5-1 地方資源配置模擬結果-定額稅 42表 5-1 地方資源配置模擬結果-資本稅 42 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 185244 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 191412 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 193661 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 241235 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 197337 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 212536 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 391668 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 340111 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 255987 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 200253 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 246042 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095255031 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Tiebout | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 異質性偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 完全流動性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 自我選擇機制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 區分效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 異質性偏好與地方公共財之最適提供水準 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Heterogeneous Preferences and the Optimal Provision of Local Public Goods | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Beckmenn, Martin J. and Yorgos Y. Papageorguou (1989). “Heterogeneous Tastes and Residential Location.” Journal of Regional Science, 29:3, 317-323. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bewley, Truman F. (1981). “A Critique of Tiebout’s Theory of Local Public Expenditures.” Econometrica, 49:3, 713-740. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bickers, Kenneth and Richard N. Engstrom (2006). “Tiebout Sorting in Metropolitan Areas.” Review of Policy Research, 23:6, 1181-1197. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boadway, Robin (1982). “On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods: Comment.” American Economic Review, 72:4, 846-851. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brueckner, Jan K. (2004). “Fiscal Decentralization with Distortionary Taxation: Tiebout vs. Tax Competition.” International Tax and Public Finance, 11:2, 133-153. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dawkins, Casey J. (2005). “Tiebout Choice and Residential Segregation by Race in US Metropolitan Areas, 1980-2000.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35:6, 734-755. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dowding, Keith, John, Peter; Biggs, Stephen (1994). “Tiebout: A Survey of the Empirical Literature.” Urban Studies, 31:4-5, 767-797. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dye, Thomas R. (1990). American Federalism: Competition Among Governments. Lexington, Mass. Lexington Books Ltd. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hansen, Nico A. and Anke S. Kessler (2001). “(Non-) Existence of Equilibria in Multicommunity Models.” Journal of Urban Economics, 50:3, 418-435. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henderson, J. Vermon (1985). “The Tiebout Model: Bring Back the Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Political Economics, 9:2, 248-264. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kessler, Anke S. and Christoph Lülfesmann (2005). “Tiebout and Redistribution in a Model of Residential and Political Choice.” Journal of Public Economics, 89:2-3, 501-528. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Peng, Shin-Kun and Ping Wang (2005). “Sorting by Foot: ‘Travel-for’ Local Public Goods and Equilibrium Stratification.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 38:4, 1224-1253. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rhode, Paul W. and Koleman S. Strumpf (2003). “Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850-1990.” American Economic Review, 93:5, 1647-1678. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Samuelson, Paul A. (1954). “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 36:4, 387-389. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schmidheity, Kurt (2006). “Income Segregation from Local Income Taxation When Households Differ in both Preferences and Incomes.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36:2, 270-299. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Starrett, David A. (1980). “On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods.” American Economic Review, 70:3, 350-392. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1983). “The Theory of Local Public Goods Twenty-Five Years after Tiebout: A Perspective.” In George R. Zodrow, ed., Local Provision of Public Service: The Tiebout Model after Twenty-Five Years. Academic Press, New York, 17-53. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tiebout, Charles M. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Public Economics, 64:5, 416-424. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wildsin, David E. (1980). “Locational Efficiency in a Federal System.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 10:4, 453-471. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Williams, Alan (1966). “The Optimal Provision of Public Goods in a System of Local Governments.”Journal of Political Economics, 74:1, 18-33. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wooders, Myrna (1980). “The Tiebout Model: Near Optimality in Local Public Good Economies.” Econometrica, 48:6, 1467-1485. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zodrow, George R. (2001). “The Property Tax as a Capital Tax: A Room with Three Views.” National Tax Journal, 54:1, 139-156. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zodrow, George R. and Peter Mieszkowski (1986). “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods.” Journal of Urban Economics, 19:3, 356-37. | zh_TW |
