| dc.contributor.advisor | 曾巨威 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 陳美慈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | CHEN,MEI-TZU | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳美慈 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | CHEN,MEI-TZU | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 11:02:49 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 11:02:49 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 11:02:49 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0912550041 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34737 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 財政研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 91255004 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 近幾年來，在國際場合或在我國政治運作中，「族群融和」議題常被提出做為討論。觀察世界各國族群分化的狀況，我們發現社會存在族群分化問題會造成資源使用的不效率、經濟成長緩慢、政府政策效能低落等。其中，就公共政策來看，主要問題為公共財提供的數量及型態，會產生扭曲的現象。Bridgman（2004）利用租稅制度的選擇，解釋在族群互動下，公共財總量提供的問題。該文提出，只要允許族群有政策工具的選擇空間，則優勢族群必會剝奪其他族群資源以追求自身利益最大，導致公共財提供的扭曲與不效率，造成社會分化與公共財之間的問題。本文以Bridgman（2004）文章為基礎，將「不同族群對公共財有不同的偏好反應」的因子，納入基本模型中。利用「公共財型態選擇機制」顯示不同族群面對相同公共財數量時，主觀的偏好反應在公共財效用差異上，使模型更臻完整。本文利用兩階段賽局方式，分別求取公共財型態均衡解與公共財數量及租稅政策的均衡解。透過均衡解的分析可發現，當族群對公共財型態有偏好差異時，公共財數量受到社會分化程度的衝擊愈大，亦即數量減少幅度較Bridgman（2004）模型結果更大，族群支付租稅的意願更低。而且，透過均衡解也可發現，當族群對公共財型態存在偏好差異，會更進一步的使公共財數量下降。此乃因族群偏好的差異透過族群間不公平的制度對待，加深了社會分化程度，更進一步減少公共財提供與資源使用效率。故政府制定相關政策時，應將族群問題納入考量，以期有更完善、公平的族群融和、社會穩定的發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1第一節 前言…………………………………………………. 1第二節 研究動機……………………………………………. 2第三節 研究方法與限制……………………………………. 3第四節 研究架構……………………………………………. 5第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………… 6第一節 族群分化的指標……………………………………. 7第二節 族群分化的現象……………………………………. 8第三節 族群分化的效果……………………………………. 11第四節 族群分化的理論……………………………………. 15第三章 Bridgman模型介紹...………………………………… 17第一節 模型背景……………………………………………. 17第二節 模型推導機制………………………………………. 19第三節 族群分化與公共財…………………………………. 22第四節 社會最適配置………………………………………. 25第五節 模型特色與延伸……………………………………. 26第四章 族群分化與公共財提供…………………………………27第一節 模型背景……………………………………………. 27第二節 公共財型態選擇機制………………………………. 29第三節 租稅與公共財數量之賽局均衡……………………. 33第四節 公共財型態之賽局均衡……………………………. 38第五節 兩階段賽局均衡……………………………………. 41第六節 小結…………………………………………………. 45第五章 族群分化程度改變之影響………………………………50第一節 族群規模變大………………………………………. 50第二節 族群個數增加………………………………………. 53第三節 小結…………………………………………………. 55第六章 結論…………………………………………………… 57參考文獻…………………………………………………………… 60圖表目次圖1-1 研究方法…………………………………………………4圖3-1 Bridgman模型架構…………………………………… 18圖4-1 延伸Bridgman模型架構……………………………… 28表2-1 世界各主要區域族群分化概況……………………… 9表2-2 東南亞洲國家族群分化概況………………………… 10表4-1 模型推導結果彙整…….………...………………… 47表4-2 Bridgman（2004）與本文之結論比較－－－兩個族群不同規 模…………………………………………………….. 48表4-3 Bridgman（2004）與本文之結論比較－－－多個族群相同規 模…………………………………………………….. 49表5-1 族群規模變大對均衡解之影響……………………… 56表5-2 族群個數增加對均衡解之影響……………………… 56 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 77824 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 52293 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 107948 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 119439 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 151078 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 334736 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 229990 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 330083 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 181313 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 144286 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 77666 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0912550041 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 族群分化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公共財 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 社會分化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 族群分裂 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 異質性偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | ethnic division | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | public good | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | ethnic diversity | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | ethnic fragmentation | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | heterogeneous preference | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 族群分化與公共財之提供 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alesina, Alberto and Enrico Spolaore (1997), “ On the Number and Size of Nation ”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.112, No.4, PP.1027-1056. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alesina, Alberto, Reza Baqir, and William Easterly (1999), “ Public goods and Ethnic Divisions ”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.114, No.4, PP.1243-1284. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alesina, Alberto, Reza Baqir, and William Easterly (2000), “ Redistributive Public Employment ”, Journal of Urban Econmics, Vol.48, PP.219-241. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alesina, Alberto and Eliana La Ferrara (2002), “ Who Trusts Others? ”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.85, August, PP.207-234. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Develeesvhauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg (2003), “ Fractionalization ”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol.8, PP.155-94. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alesina, Alberto, and Eliana La Ferrara (2004), “ Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance ”, NBER Working Paper, 10313. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alesina, Alberto, and Allan Drazen (1991), “ Why are Stabilization Delayed ”, American Economic Review, Vol.81, PP.1170-1188. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Annett, Anthony (2001), “Social Fractionalization, Political Instability, and the Size of Government ”, IMF Staff papers, Vol.48, No.3. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bridgman, Benjamin (2004), “ Multiethnic Democracy ”, Department of Economics Working Paper, Louisiana State University, March. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Caselli, Francesco and Wilbur John Coleman (2002), “On the Theory of Ethnic Conflict ”, Mimeo, Harvard University Working Draft. http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/caselli/caselli.html. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Easterly, William and Ross Levine (1997), “ Africa’s Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions ”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.112, No.4, PP.1203-1250. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Easterly, William (2000), “ Can Institution Resolve Ethnic Conflict ? ”, World Bank Working Paper, Novernmeber. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Esteban, Joan-Maria and Debraj Ray (1994), “ On the Measurement of Polarization ”, Econometrica, Vol.62, No.4, PP.819-851. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gans, Joshua S. and Michael Smart (1996), “ Majority Voting with Single-crossing Preference ”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.59, PP.219-237. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kuijs, Louis (2000), “ The Impact of Ethnic Heterogeneity on the Quantity and Quality of Public Spending ”, IMF Working paper, WP/00/49. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lassen, David Dreyer (2003), “ Ethnic Divisions and the Size of the Informal Sector ”, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU) Working Paper Series, University of Copenhagen, No.03-01. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCarty, Therese A. (1993), “ Demographic Diversity and the Size of the Public Sector ”, Kyklos, Vol.46, No.2, PP.225-240. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rodrik, Dani (2000), “ Participatory Politics, Social Cooperation, and Economic Stability ”, The American Economic Review, Vol.90, No.2, PP.140-144. | zh_TW |
