1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 影響跨公司合作創新的因素之研究－融合知識基礎觀點與組織學習觀點
作者 鄭景華
貢獻者 湯宗益
鄭景華
關鍵詞 吸收能力
合作能力
知識整合能力
知識整合機制
知識整合創新能力
跨公司合作
組織創新績
absorptive capacity
cooperative competency
knowledge integration capability
knowledge integration mechanism
knowledge integration and innovation capability
inter-firm collaboration
nnovation performance
日期 2003
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 14:21:09 (UTC+8)
摘要 在持續創新的需求下，跨公司合作已成為企業整合應用知識，創新求變的重要策略。本文融合知識基礎觀點和組織學習觀點，指出跨公司合作所帶來的組織創新績效，係因合作夥伴知識整合的結果。因此研究的目的除了要實證知識整合與組織創新績效的關係外，主要在發展一個理論架構，說明影響跨公司合作創新的因素，及這些因素之間的關係。在研究設計上，本文係以我國高科技產業、資訊服務業及金融服務業做為問卷調查的對象，將所收集的資料透過探索性分析與驗證性分析兩階段檢定本文所提出之量測模式與研究假說，結果得到下列結論：
1. 跨公司合作為企業所帶來的創新績效，可以用知識整合的觀點來解釋，當企業知識整合能力越好，跨公司合作創新績效會越好。
2. 知識整合能力受到企業知識吸收能力的影響，吸收能力係企業先前知識的蓄積量，以及應用這些知識的能力之綜合。
3. 知識整合能力亦受到企業與夥伴合作的能力之影響，合作能力包括企業與夥伴建立信任關係，以及溝通、協調的能力。
4. 知識特質受知識整合機制的中介而影響創新績效，跨公司合作所帶來組織的創新績效，主要不受合作所牽涉知識之外顯╱內隱與複雜性特質的影響，必須應知識特質的不同而採取適當的整合機制後，才能因知識整合而產生創新績效。
5. 吸收能力、合作能力與知識整合機制是相互影響的因素，三者形成企業知識整合創新能力的主要構面，是企業追求跨公司合作創新必須重視的要素。
Inter-firm collaboration has been an important strategy for firms to integrate and apply knowledge among their partners in order to obtain innovation performance under uncertainty circumstances. This study combining the knowledge based view and the organizational learning perspective, considers the innovation performance improvement as the result of knowledge integration. Besides examining the relation between innovation performance and knowledge integration, the purpose of this study is to find the factors influencing inter-firm collaboration performance and the relationships among these factors. The data collecting from Taiwan’s high-tech, information service and finance industry were used in the exploratory and confirmatory phases to evaluate the instruments and test the hypotheses. The conclusions are listed as below:
1. The innovation performance gaining from inter-firm collaboration can be considered as the result of knowledge integration. While the knowledge integration capability of a firm is better, the firm’s innovation performance in inter-firm collaborations will be better too.
2. The knowledge integration capability of a firm is influenced by the absorptive capacity of the firm. And the firm’s absorptive capacity derives from the firm’s prior knowledge accumulation and the capability to apply their knowledge.
3. The knowledge integration capability of a firm is also influenced by their cooperative competency. The cooperative competency is composed of three interrelated facets: trust, communication and coordination.
4. Firm’s innovation performance in an inter-firm collaboration doesn’t directly influenced by the explicit/tacit and complexity characteristics of the knowledge which appeared in the collaboration. To produce innovation performance, knowledge with different characteristics should be integrated by suitable integration mechanisms.
5. Absorptive capacity, corporative competency and knowledge integration mechanism construct firm’s “knowledge integration and innovation capability”, which is important to firm’s innovation performance in inter-firm collaborations.
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文部分
1. 方世杰 (民88)，產研研發聯盟之廠商特質、技術移轉特性、互動機制與績效之研究，管理學報，第十六卷，第四期，633-659。
2. 方世杰、林麗娟、鄭仲興(民89)，合作研發之組織學習與績效的研究—以參與工研院科技專案之廠商為例，科技管理學刊，第五卷，第三期，105-133。
3. 吳思華(民87)，知識流通對產業創新的影響，第七屆產業管理研討會，國立政治大學，1-42。
4. 吳思華(民90)，策略九說：策略思考的本質，台北：臉譜文化公司。
5. 呂鴻德、朱倍瑩(民91)，高科技與服務業知識整合機制與知識移轉績效比較之研究，經法社制論叢，第二十九期，29-54。
6. 李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍(民87），臺灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究，科技管理學刊，第三卷，第一期，37-80。
7. 林文寶(民90)，技術知識特性、整合、知識能量與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關聯性之研究，國立成功大學企業管理學系之未出版博士論文。
8. 張紹勳(民90)，研究方法，台中：滄海書局。
9. 劉常勇(民88)，知識管理與企業發展，劉常勇管理學習知識庫，http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/paper/paper23.doc。
10. 蔡明田、莊立民、劉春初(民91)，組織創新衡量之研究，產業論壇，第三卷，第二期，83-105。
11. 蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(民90)，組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係，管理學報，第十八卷，第四期，525-566。
12. 簡俊成(民91)，外部知識移轉過程—合作關係與吸收潛力角色之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。
英文部分
1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3, 425-456.
2. Alavi, M. and Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029-1037.
3. Almedia, P., Song, J. and Grant, R. M. (2002). Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building, Organization Science, 13(2), 147-161.
4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization, Behavior, 10, 123-167.
5. Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J. and Wojcik, T. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration, Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418-431.
6. Andaleeb, S. S. (1992). The trust concept: Research issues for channels of distribution,” in Research in Marketing, Vol. 11, Jagdish, N. Sheth, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributer firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58.
8. Anderson, M. (1995). The role of collaborative integration in industrial organization: observations from Canadian aerospace industry, Economic Geography, 71, 187-200.
9. Arku, G. (2002). Collaboration in industry: Empirical findings among small electronics manufacturing firms in the Greater Toronto Area, GeoJournal, 57(4), 301-312.
10. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1992). Inward technology licensing as an alternative to international R&D in new product development: An conceptual framework, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 156-167.
11. Bastos, P. (2001). Inter-firm collaboration and learning: The case of the Japanese automobile industry, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(4), 423-441.
12. Becerra-Fernandez I. and Sabherwal R. (2001). Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, Sum., 23-55.
13. Beckett-Camarata, E. J., Camarata, M. R. and Barker, R. T.(1998). Integrating internal and external customer relationships through relationship management: a strategic response to a changing global environment, Journal of Business Research, 41, 71-81.
14. Beveren, J. V. (2002). A model of knowledge acquisition that refocuses knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management. 6(1), 18-22.
15. Blau, J. R. and McKinley, W. (1979). Idea, complexity, and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 200-219.
16. Brown, J. S. (1991). Research That Reinvents the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 102-111.
17. Burgess, B .H. (1989). Industrial Organization, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
18. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
19. Currall, S. C. and Inkpen, A. C. (2002). A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 479-495.
20. Daft, R. L. (1989). Organization Theory and Design, West, St, Paul.
21. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
22. Davenport, T. H. and Glaser, J. (2002). Just-in-time-delivery comes to knowledge management, Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 107-111.
23. Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge：How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press.
24. De Boer, M., Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex, Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379-398.
25. Demsetz, H. (1991). The theory of the firm revisited, in William & Winter(eds.) The Nature of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures, Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.
27. Dougherty, D. and Bowman, E. H. (1995). The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation, California Management Review, 37(4), 28-44.
28. Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society, Harper-Collins.
29. Drucker, P. (2002). The discipline of innovation, Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95-101.
30. Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
31. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50.
32. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New Century Publishing Company.
33. Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization, Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 78-91.
34. Gold, A., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
35. Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration, Organization Science, 7(4), 375-388.
36. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, Winter Special Issue, 109-122.
37. Grant, R.M. and Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration, Academy of Management Journal Best Papers Proceedings, 17-21.
38. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
39. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.
40. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T. (1999). What`s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-116.
41. Hoch, D. J., Roeding, C. R., Purkert, G., Lindner, S. K. and Muller, R. (2000). Secrets of Software Success, McKinsey & Company, Inc.
42. Huizing, A., Koster, E. and Bouman, W. (1997). Balance in business reengineering: An empirical study of fit and performance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 93-118.
43. Iansiti, M. and West, J. (1997). Technology integration: Turning great research into great products, Harvard Business Review, 75(3), 69-79.
44. Inkpen, A. C. (1998). Learning, knowledge acquisition, strategic alliances, European Management Journal, 16(2), 223-229.
45. Inkpen, A. C. (2000). A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope, Strategic Management Journal, 21(7), 775-781.
46. Inkpen, A. C. and Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures , Organization Science, 9(4), 454468.
47. Inkpen, A. C. and Ross, J. (2001). Why do some strategic alliances persist beyond their useful life?, California Management Review, 44(1), 132-149.
48. Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B. and Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based knowledge management, Journal of International Management, 19, 121-139.
49. Johnston, R. and Gibbons, GM. (1975). Characteristics of information usage in technological innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 22, 27-34.
50. Jöreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (2000). LISREL VI, Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods (7th ed.). Mooresville, IN, Scientific Software.
51. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
52. Katz, R., Rebentisch, E. S. and Allen, T. J. (1996). A study of technology transfer in multinational cooperative joint venture, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43(1), 97-105.
53. Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress and outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547-555.
54. Kim, L. (1980). Organizational innovation and structure, Journal of Business Research, 8, 225-245.
55. Kimberly, J.R., and Evanisko, M.J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations, Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
56. Kleiner, A. and Roth, G. (1997). How to make experience your company`s best teacher, Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 172-177.
57. Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319-332.
58. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, integration capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
59. Kuada, J. (2002). Collaboration between developed and developing country-based firms: Danish-German experience, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(6), 538-557.
60. Kumar, K. and Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems, MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279-300.
61. Lane, P. J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-477.
62. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts.
63. Litter, D., Leverick, F. and Wilson, D. (1998). Collaboration in new technology based product markets, International Journal of Technology Management, 15(1,2), 139-159.
64. Lukas, B. A. and Bell, S. J. (2000). Strategic market position and R&D capability in global manufacturing industries: implications for organizational learning memory, Industrial Marketing Management, 29(6), 565-574.
65. Macdoland, S. (1994). Formal collaboration and informal information flow, International Journal of Technology Management, 7(1), 49-60.
66. Madhavan, R. and Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management, Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 1-12.
67. Malone, T. W. and Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination and how it help design coorperative work system? Conference on Computer –Supported Cooperative Work, 357-370.
68. March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations, New York: Wiley.
69. Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-149.
70. Mohr, J. J. and Sengupta, S. (2002). Managing the paradox of inter-firm learning: the role of governance mechanisms, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(4), 282-301.
71. Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
72. Mowyer, D. S., Oxley, J. E. and Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
73. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company, Harvard Business Review,
74. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
75. Nonaka, I., Reinmoller, P. and Toyoama, R. (2001). Integrated information technology systems for knowledge creation, in Dierkes, M., Antal, A. B., Child, J. and Nonaka, I. ed., Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press, 827-846.
76. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
77. Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transcation cost examination of interfirm cooperation, Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.
78. Quinn, B. J. (1999). Strategic outsourcing: knowledge capabilities, Sloan Management Review, Sum, 9-21.
79. Scott, J. E., (2000). Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(2), 81-113.
80. Sena and Shani, (1999). Intellectual capital and knowledge creation—Towards an alternative framework, in Knowledge Management Handbook, by J. Liebowitz, New York.
81. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline- the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
82. Simon, H. A. (1973). Applying information technology to organization design, Public Administration Review, 33, 268-278.
83. Sivadas, E. and Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes, Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-49.
84. Smilor, R. W. and Gibson, D. V. (1991). Technology transfer in multi-organizational environment: The case of R&D Consortia, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 3-13.
85. Stata, R. (1989). Organizational learning: the key to management innovation, Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 64-73.
86. Steensma, H. K. (1996). Acquiring technological competencies through interorganizational collaboration: An organizational learning perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, 267-286.
87. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets, California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.
88. Teece, D. J. and Pisano, G. (l994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 537-556.
89. Thompson, J. D. (2003). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York: Transaction Pub.
90. Tidd, J. and Trewhella, M. J. (1997). Organizational and technological antecedents of knowledge acquisition and learning, R&D Management, 27(4), 359-375.
91. Tripsas, M. 1997. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 6, 341-377.
92. Tyler, B. B. (2001). The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18, 1-27.
93. von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
94. Zahra, A. S. and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
95. Zammuto, R. F. and O`Connor, E. J. (1992). Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies` benefits: the roles of organization design and culture, Academy of Management Review, 17(4),701-728.
96. Zirger, H. S. and Maidique, M. A. (1990). A model of new product development: An empirical test, Management Science, 36(7), 867-883.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
資訊管理研究所
86356503
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086356503
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 湯宗益zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鄭景華zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 鄭景華zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 14:21:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 14:21:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 14:21:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0086356503en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35170-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 資訊管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 86356503zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在持續創新的需求下，跨公司合作已成為企業整合應用知識，創新求變的重要策略。本文融合知識基礎觀點和組織學習觀點，指出跨公司合作所帶來的組織創新績效，係因合作夥伴知識整合的結果。因此研究的目的除了要實證知識整合與組織創新績效的關係外，主要在發展一個理論架構，說明影響跨公司合作創新的因素，及這些因素之間的關係。在研究設計上，本文係以我國高科技產業、資訊服務業及金融服務業做為問卷調查的對象，將所收集的資料透過探索性分析與驗證性分析兩階段檢定本文所提出之量測模式與研究假說，結果得到下列結論：
1. 跨公司合作為企業所帶來的創新績效，可以用知識整合的觀點來解釋，當企業知識整合能力越好，跨公司合作創新績效會越好。
2. 知識整合能力受到企業知識吸收能力的影響，吸收能力係企業先前知識的蓄積量，以及應用這些知識的能力之綜合。
3. 知識整合能力亦受到企業與夥伴合作的能力之影響，合作能力包括企業與夥伴建立信任關係，以及溝通、協調的能力。
4. 知識特質受知識整合機制的中介而影響創新績效，跨公司合作所帶來組織的創新績效，主要不受合作所牽涉知識之外顯╱內隱與複雜性特質的影響，必須應知識特質的不同而採取適當的整合機制後，才能因知識整合而產生創新績效。
5. 吸收能力、合作能力與知識整合機制是相互影響的因素，三者形成企業知識整合創新能力的主要構面，是企業追求跨公司合作創新必須重視的要素。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Inter-firm collaboration has been an important strategy for firms to integrate and apply knowledge among their partners in order to obtain innovation performance under uncertainty circumstances. This study combining the knowledge based view and the organizational learning perspective, considers the innovation performance improvement as the result of knowledge integration. Besides examining the relation between innovation performance and knowledge integration, the purpose of this study is to find the factors influencing inter-firm collaboration performance and the relationships among these factors. The data collecting from Taiwan’s high-tech, information service and finance industry were used in the exploratory and confirmatory phases to evaluate the instruments and test the hypotheses. The conclusions are listed as below:
1. The innovation performance gaining from inter-firm collaboration can be considered as the result of knowledge integration. While the knowledge integration capability of a firm is better, the firm’s innovation performance in inter-firm collaborations will be better too.
2. The knowledge integration capability of a firm is influenced by the absorptive capacity of the firm. And the firm’s absorptive capacity derives from the firm’s prior knowledge accumulation and the capability to apply their knowledge.
3. The knowledge integration capability of a firm is also influenced by their cooperative competency. The cooperative competency is composed of three interrelated facets: trust, communication and coordination.
4. Firm’s innovation performance in an inter-firm collaboration doesn’t directly influenced by the explicit/tacit and complexity characteristics of the knowledge which appeared in the collaboration. To produce innovation performance, knowledge with different characteristics should be integrated by suitable integration mechanisms.
5. Absorptive capacity, corporative competency and knowledge integration mechanism construct firm’s “knowledge integration and innovation capability”, which is important to firm’s innovation performance in inter-firm collaborations.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 研究範圍 4
第四節 研究限制 5
第五節 研究流程與論文架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 跨公司合作創新的理論基礎 8
一、跨公司合作創新 8
二、知識基礎理論 12
三、組織學習理論 14
第二節 影響跨公司合作創新的因素 18
一、吸收能力 18
二、合作能力 19
三、知識整合能力 21
四、知識整合機制 22
五、知識整合創新能力 24
第三節 組織創新績效 27
第三章 研究設計 28
第一節 研究架構 28
一、知識整合能力模式 31
二、知識整合機制與組織創新績效 33
三、知識整合創新能力與組織創新績效 36
第二節 研究假設 37
第三節 研究變數的操作化與衡量 43
第四章 探索性分析 48
第一節 樣本資料收集 48
第二節 量測工具之效度與信度分析 49
一、內容效度 49
二、建構效度 49
第五章 驗證性分析 51
第一節 量測模式之分析與檢定 51
一、知識整合能力模式的量測模式之一階驗證性因素分析 53
二、知識特質與知識整合機制的量測模式之一階驗證性因素分析 55
三、知識整合創新能力量測模式之驗證性因素分析 57
第二節 結構模式之分析與檢定 63
一、知識整合能力模式的分析與檢定 63
二、知識特質與知識整合機制的結構模式分析與檢定 70
三、知識整合創新能力的結構模式分析與檢定 75
第六章 結論與意涵 77
第一節 研究結果與發現 78
一、吸收能力、合作能力、知識整合能力與組織創新績效的關係 78
二、知識特質、知識整合機制與組織創新績效的關係 79
三、知識整合創新能力是跨公司合作創新的重要影響因素 80
四、研究貢獻 82
第二節 管理實務意涵 84
第三節 對後續研究之建議 87
參考文獻 88
附錄：問卷 95


表目錄
表1-1 研究範圍界定 4
表3-1 本文觀念性架構之理論基礎、主要構念與分析重點 30
表3-2 構念之衡量與變項之操作化 45
表4-1 樣本基本資料分析 48
表4-2 探索性因素分析與信度分析的結果 50
表5-1 知識整合能力量測模式驗證性因素分析的結果 54
表5-2 知識整合能力量測模式建構效度分析 55
表5-3知識特質與知識整合機制量測模式驗證性因素分析的結果 56
表5-4 知識特質與知識整合機制量測模式的建構效度分析 56
表5-5 觀察變數對潛在變數的複迴歸係數 58
表5-6 構念之個別信度與組合信度表 59
表5-7 構面萃取變異與構面間的R2值 60
表5-8 知識整合創新能力各因素間之相關矩陣 61
表5-9 知識整合創新能力之二階驗證性因素分析之因素負荷值 62
表5-10 知識整合能力模式迴歸係數與相關係數彙總表 69
表5-11 知識整合能力模式研究假說驗證結果總表 69
表5-12 知識特質與知識整合機制潛在變數徑路係數表 72
表5-13 知識特質與知識整合機制研究假說驗證結果總表 74


圖目錄
圖3-1 本文之觀念性架構圖(資料來源：本研究) 31
圖3-2 知識整合能力模式的研究架構圖(資料來源：本研究) 33
圖3-3 知識特質的分類架構與整合機制的關係(資料來源：本研究) 34
圖3-4 知識特質、知識整合機制與組織創新績效之研究架構 35
圖3-5 知識整合創新能力之概念性架構 36
圖3-6 知識整合創新能力與創新績效關係之研究架構 36
圖5-1 知識整合能力模式的量測模式(資料來源：本研究) 53
圖5-2 知識特質與知識整合機制量測模式 56
圖5-3 知識整合創新能力之一階驗證性因素分析模式 57
圖5-4 知識整合創新能力之二階驗證性因素分析模式 61
圖5-5 吸收能力對知識整合能力結構模式之驗證結果 65
圖5-6 合作能力對知識整合能力結構模式之驗證結果 66
圖5-7 吸收能力與合作能力結構模式之驗證結果 67
圖5-8 知識整合能力模式分析結果 68
圖5-9知識特質與組織創新績效關係的驗證 72
圖5-10 知識特質、整合機制與組織創新績效的驗證 73
圖5-11 知識整合創新能力結構模式驗證結果 75		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 45930 bytes-
dc.format.extent 71872 bytes-
dc.format.extent 66875 bytes-
dc.format.extent 122039 bytes-
dc.format.extent 199180 bytes-
dc.format.extent 207962 bytes-
dc.format.extent 136801 bytes-
dc.format.extent 344349 bytes-
dc.format.extent 196105 bytes-
dc.format.extent 89605 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086356503en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 吸收能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合作能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識整合能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識整合機制zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識整合創新能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 跨公司合作zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織創新績zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) absorptive capacityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) cooperative competencyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge integration capabilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge integration mechanismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge integration and innovation capabilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) inter-firm collaborationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) nnovation performanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 影響跨公司合作創新的因素之研究－融合知識基礎觀點與組織學習觀點zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 方世杰 (民88)，產研研發聯盟之廠商特質、技術移轉特性、互動機制與績效之研究，管理學報，第十六卷，第四期，633-659。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 方世杰、林麗娟、鄭仲興(民89)，合作研發之組織學習與績效的研究—以參與工研院科技專案之廠商為例，科技管理學刊，第五卷，第三期，105-133。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. 吳思華(民87)，知識流通對產業創新的影響，第七屆產業管理研討會，國立政治大學，1-42。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. 吳思華(民90)，策略九說：策略思考的本質，台北：臉譜文化公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. 呂鴻德、朱倍瑩(民91)，高科技與服務業知識整合機制與知識移轉績效比較之研究，經法社制論叢，第二十九期，29-54。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. 李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍(民87），臺灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究，科技管理學刊，第三卷，第一期，37-80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. 林文寶(民90)，技術知識特性、整合、知識能量與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關聯性之研究，國立成功大學企業管理學系之未出版博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. 張紹勳(民90)，研究方法，台中：滄海書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. 劉常勇(民88)，知識管理與企業發展，劉常勇管理學習知識庫，http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/paper/paper23.doc。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. 蔡明田、莊立民、劉春初(民91)，組織創新衡量之研究，產業論壇，第三卷，第二期，83-105。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. 蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(民90)，組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係，管理學報，第十八卷，第四期，525-566。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. 簡俊成(民91)，外部知識移轉過程—合作關係與吸收潛力角色之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3, 425-456.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Alavi, M. and Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029-1037.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Almedia, P., Song, J. and Grant, R. M. (2002). Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building, Organization Science, 13(2), 147-161.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization, Behavior, 10, 123-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J. and Wojcik, T. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration, Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418-431.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Andaleeb, S. S. (1992). The trust concept: Research issues for channels of distribution,” in Research in Marketing, Vol. 11, Jagdish, N. Sheth, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributer firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Anderson, M. (1995). The role of collaborative integration in industrial organization: observations from Canadian aerospace industry, Economic Geography, 71, 187-200.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Arku, G. (2002). Collaboration in industry: Empirical findings among small electronics manufacturing firms in the Greater Toronto Area, GeoJournal, 57(4), 301-312.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1992). Inward technology licensing as an alternative to international R&D in new product development: An conceptual framework, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 156-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Bastos, P. (2001). Inter-firm collaboration and learning: The case of the Japanese automobile industry, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(4), 423-441.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Becerra-Fernandez I. and Sabherwal R. (2001). Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, Sum., 23-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Beckett-Camarata, E. J., Camarata, M. R. and Barker, R. T.(1998). Integrating internal and external customer relationships through relationship management: a strategic response to a changing global environment, Journal of Business Research, 41, 71-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Beveren, J. V. (2002). A model of knowledge acquisition that refocuses knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management. 6(1), 18-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Blau, J. R. and McKinley, W. (1979). Idea, complexity, and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 200-219.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Brown, J. S. (1991). Research That Reinvents the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 102-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Burgess, B .H. (1989). Industrial Organization, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. Currall, S. C. and Inkpen, A. C. (2002). A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 479-495.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Daft, R. L. (1989). Organization Theory and Design, West, St, Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. Davenport, T. H. and Glaser, J. (2002). Just-in-time-delivery comes to knowledge management, Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 107-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge：How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. De Boer, M., Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex, Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379-398.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. Demsetz, H. (1991). The theory of the firm revisited, in William & Winter(eds.) The Nature of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures, Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. Dougherty, D. and Bowman, E. H. (1995). The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation, California Management Review, 37(4), 28-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society, Harper-Collins.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. Drucker, P. (2002). The discipline of innovation, Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New Century Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33. Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization, Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 78-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34. Gold, A., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35. Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration, Organization Science, 7(4), 375-388.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36. Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, Winter Special Issue, 109-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37. Grant, R.M. and Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration, Academy of Management Journal Best Papers Proceedings, 17-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T. (1999). What`s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41. Hoch, D. J., Roeding, C. R., Purkert, G., Lindner, S. K. and Muller, R. (2000). Secrets of Software Success, McKinsey & Company, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42. Huizing, A., Koster, E. and Bouman, W. (1997). Balance in business reengineering: An empirical study of fit and performance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 93-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43. Iansiti, M. and West, J. (1997). Technology integration: Turning great research into great products, Harvard Business Review, 75(3), 69-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44. Inkpen, A. C. (1998). Learning, knowledge acquisition, strategic alliances, European Management Journal, 16(2), 223-229.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45. Inkpen, A. C. (2000). A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope, Strategic Management Journal, 21(7), 775-781.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46. Inkpen, A. C. and Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures , Organization Science, 9(4), 454468.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47. Inkpen, A. C. and Ross, J. (2001). Why do some strategic alliances persist beyond their useful life?, California Management Review, 44(1), 132-149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48. Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B. and Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based knowledge management, Journal of International Management, 19, 121-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 49. Johnston, R. and Gibbons, GM. (1975). Characteristics of information usage in technological innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 22, 27-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 50. Jöreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (2000). LISREL VI, Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods (7th ed.). Mooresville, IN, Scientific Software.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 52. Katz, R., Rebentisch, E. S. and Allen, T. J. (1996). A study of technology transfer in multinational cooperative joint venture, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43(1), 97-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 53. Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress and outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547-555.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 54. Kim, L. (1980). Organizational innovation and structure, Journal of Business Research, 8, 225-245.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 55. Kimberly, J.R., and Evanisko, M.J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations, Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 56. Kleiner, A. and Roth, G. (1997). How to make experience your company`s best teacher, Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 172-177.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 57. Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319-332.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 58. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, integration capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, 3, 383-397.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 59. Kuada, J. (2002). Collaboration between developed and developing country-based firms: Danish-German experience, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(6), 538-557.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 60. Kumar, K. and Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems, MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 61. Lane, P. J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-477.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 62. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 63. Litter, D., Leverick, F. and Wilson, D. (1998). Collaboration in new technology based product markets, International Journal of Technology Management, 15(1,2), 139-159.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 64. Lukas, B. A. and Bell, S. J. (2000). Strategic market position and R&D capability in global manufacturing industries: implications for organizational learning memory, Industrial Marketing Management, 29(6), 565-574.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 65. Macdoland, S. (1994). Formal collaboration and informal information flow, International Journal of Technology Management, 7(1), 49-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 66. Madhavan, R. and Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management, Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 67. Malone, T. W. and Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination and how it help design coorperative work system? Conference on Computer –Supported Cooperative Work, 357-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 68. March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations, New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 69. Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 70. Mohr, J. J. and Sengupta, S. (2002). Managing the paradox of inter-firm learning: the role of governance mechanisms, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(4), 282-301.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 71. Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 72. Mowyer, D. S., Oxley, J. E. and Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 73. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company, Harvard Business Review,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 74. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 75. Nonaka, I., Reinmoller, P. and Toyoama, R. (2001). Integrated information technology systems for knowledge creation, in Dierkes, M., Antal, A. B., Child, J. and Nonaka, I. ed., Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press, 827-846.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 76. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 77. Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transcation cost examination of interfirm cooperation, Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 78. Quinn, B. J. (1999). Strategic outsourcing: knowledge capabilities, Sloan Management Review, Sum, 9-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 79. Scott, J. E., (2000). Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(2), 81-113.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 80. Sena and Shani, (1999). Intellectual capital and knowledge creation—Towards an alternative framework, in Knowledge Management Handbook, by J. Liebowitz, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 81. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline- the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 82. Simon, H. A. (1973). Applying information technology to organization design, Public Administration Review, 33, 268-278.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 83. Sivadas, E. and Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes, Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 84. Smilor, R. W. and Gibson, D. V. (1991). Technology transfer in multi-organizational environment: The case of R&D Consortia, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 3-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 85. Stata, R. (1989). Organizational learning: the key to management innovation, Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 64-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 86. Steensma, H. K. (1996). Acquiring technological competencies through interorganizational collaboration: An organizational learning perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, 267-286.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 87. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets, California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 88. Teece, D. J. and Pisano, G. (l994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 537-556.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 89. Thompson, J. D. (2003). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York: Transaction Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 90. Tidd, J. and Trewhella, M. J. (1997). Organizational and technological antecedents of knowledge acquisition and learning, R&D Management, 27(4), 359-375.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 91. Tripsas, M. 1997. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 6, 341-377.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 92. Tyler, B. B. (2001). The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18, 1-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 93. von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 94. Zahra, A. S. and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 95. Zammuto, R. F. and O`Connor, E. J. (1992). Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies` benefits: the roles of organization design and culture, Academy of Management Review, 17(4),701-728.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 96. Zirger, H. S. and Maidique, M. A. (1990). A model of new product development: An empirical test, Management Science, 36(7), 867-883.zh_TW