Publications-Theses

題名 公益創投之可行性研究--以表演藝術團體為例
作者 陳錦誠
Chen, Chin-cheng
貢獻者 樓永堅
Lo, Yung chien
陳錦誠
Chen, Chin-cheng
關鍵詞 公益創投
表演藝術團體
非營利組織
企業贊助
藝術補助
Venture Philanthropy
Performing Arts Groups
Non-profit Organizations
Private Funding
Arts Subsidy
日期 2004
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 14:50:07 (UTC+8)
摘要 公部門站在主要的資金提供者,並鼓勵企業加入贊助行列,支持表演藝術團體的持續發展。但是,有限資源面對眾多的申請者,資源提供者(公部門以及企業部門),大都採取被動的態度,受理申請。這種傳統的資源提供模式,採取名額多、補助額度少的方式。因此,為爭取更多的資源,表演藝術團體必須在不同部門之間奔走,尋求資金挹注的最佳組合。此一模式,長期以來,造成資金提供者與資金需求者(表演團體),雙方在資源交換的效率低、交換後雙方都不滿意;就社會行銷的觀點而言,如此的交換模式耗損相當高的交易成本,資源無法有效的整合與運用,無法創造最大的社會效益。使得公部門、企業、表演團體都急於尋找資源有效運用的良方。
以發掘商業組織為對象的創業投資,運用到以非營利組織為對象。透過策略管理的方式慎選投資標的,建構可以創造高社會報酬的計畫,稱為公益創投。本研究假設,公益創投可以運用在以創意為核心表演藝藝術產業,探討表演團體接受公益創投的可行性。公益創投主動尋求投資之標的,長期參與不僅投注資金,也投入人力以及各項資源。並要求達成設定的績效目標以及價值與利潤的回饋。
經由文獻探討,並以實務經驗者參與焦點座談的方式,實際模擬遴選準則以及實務上可能之標的等。發現對於公益創投的模式,表演藝術團體是有條件的接受,在尊重藝術創作的前提下,它提供一套系統化的投資方式,提昇資源應用的效率,創造更高的社會效益。讓有潛力的團體,能夠在需要的時機被主動發掘,成為重點投資的對象。是傳統藝術資源運用模式之外的另一項具有策略性的選項。建議,在現有的資源中提出一定的比例,採行公益創投的模式重點投資值得發展的計畫。
The public sector plays a prominent part as the primary funding channels for performing arts groups as well as appeals to the private sector for joining the funding game. Limited funding resources have proven to be challenged for numerous fund-seeking applicants. The resource providers (public and private funding sectors) have been known to take on a passive attitude—accepting, assessing and allocating sent applications. This traditional interaction frequently adapts the “more dividers, less grant” model. In turn, performing arts groups spend more time circling different funding departments, in search of the best funding combination to meet their needs.

This long-adopted method has caused low efficiency on both the funding providers and the funding seekers. Both parties rarely exchange their resources and even when do so, rarely are both parties satisfied with the mode of exchange. Taking the view of social marketing , this exchange pattern not only results in transaction costs, resources are left ineffectively integrated and therefore fails in reaching the best social beneficiary. Foreseeing hazardous future in funding, public sectors, enterprises and performing arts groups are jumping to find best applicable measures to resource integration.

Seeking venture capitals to invest in nonprofit organizations. Weighing through strategic management and invest in the chosen organization to create high social rewards is “Venture Philanthropy”. This study hypothesizes Venture Philanthropy can be exercised on performing arts industry and based on this hypothesis, the study will discuss the feasibility of performing arts groups accepting Venture Philanthropy. Venture Philanthropy actively seeks investment target which not only participates in capital for the long run, but also puts forth human resources and other related assets. Investors must ask for the achievement of the assumed goal and the feeback of values and profits.

In-depth research in literatures, seminars of administrators in performing arts groups, simulating panel selection with prospective invested candidates, this study finds Venture Philanthropy module is conditionally accepted by performing arts groups. Under the premises that investors trully respect artistic originalities , Mode of Venture Philanthropy provides a systematic investing frame and by increasing the efficiency of applied resources, highly beneficial results are introduced to the society. The module allows potential arts groups to be actively sought out in need time and become key investments. This boasts another strategic opportunity outside the traditional interaction between performing arts groups and funding sectors. In conclusion, it is highly suggested that a certain percentage of the existing resources can be released as Venture Philanthropy module to amplify deserving and potential groups .
參考文獻 一、 中文部份
1.中華民國表演藝術協會,2003年,藝文贊助Q&A。
2.中華民國表演藝術協會,2005年,台灣地區表演藝術產業現況調查。
3.吳思華,1998,策略九說,台北:麥田出版社。
4.吳思華,2004年,「創意與經營需相輔相成」,天下雜誌5月出版。
5.李政達,1997年,"我國創業投資事業之現況與政策檢討",經濟情勢 暨評論季刊,經濟部研究發展委員會。
6.金玉琦,2003,「非營利組織資源開發新途徑-公益創投與社會企業之可行性研究」,南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。P.21
7.施顏祥 (2002). 文化創意產業發展計畫. 挑戰2008國家重點發展計畫, 台北, 行政院經濟建設委員會。
8.林曼麗策劃,2004年,「藝企風華」總論篇,典藏出版。
9.曹富生,2004年,動腦雜誌,8月號第340輯。
10.葉一璋、葉上葆,2003年「公益創投:非營利組織再造的新契機」,行政院研究發展考核委員會,第三部門產業化新趨勢研討會會議實錄。
11.漢寶德,2002年,「各國藝術資助政策的探討」,中央日報副刊。
12.劉常勇,1997年,"如何成為相中千馬駒的伯樂—創業投資評估決策程序",會計研究月刊,134期。
13.謝瑩潔,2001,我國藝術補助機制之檢討—以組織、運作及財源籌措為例,台灣大學公共行政組碩士論文。
14.聶光炎,2000年,劇場設計16答問,原載於表演藝術雜誌,第100期。
二、 英文部份
1.Bruno S. Frey,Arts & Economics:Analysis & Cultural Policy(2000)當藝術遇上經濟一個案分析與文化政策,2003年,典藏出版。
2.Bruno S Frey(2002年) 創造性、政府與藝術Creativity, Government and the Arts,漢寶德譯。
3.Christine Letts、William Ryan and Allen Gossman,「Virtuous Capital:What Foundations Can Learn From Venture Capitalists向創投借鏡:基金會與創投公司的比較」, Harvard Business Review哈佛商業論叢。2000,台北:天下遠見出版公司。
4.David Throsby,Economics and Culture(2001)文化經濟學,2003年,典藏出版。
5.DCMS,2001,2001Creative Industries Mapping Documents UK,p.5。轉引自「文化創意產業概況分析調查」,民國91年,經濟建設委員會出版
6.Harry Hillman-Chartrand (c) and Claire McCaughey(1989),The Arm’s Length Principle and the Arts: An International Perspective,漢寶德譯。
7.John Pick原著,1988,(藝術與公共政策),江靜玲譯,台北—桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
8.Richard Caves,Creative Industries:Contracts Between Art and Commerce(2000)文化創意產業:以契約達成藝術與商業的媒合,2003年,典藏出版
三、 參考網站
1.財團法人國家文化藝術基金會
www.ncafroc.org.tw/index.asp
2.行政院文化建設委員會
www.cca.gov.tw
3.英國藝術與企業協會Arts &Business UK(A&B)
www.workingwithartists.co.uk/#
4.美國藝術與企業協會Arts& Business Council Inc.
www.potomacbca.org
5.澳洲企業藝術基金會Australia Business Arts Foundation
www.abaf.org.au/
6.財團法人國策研究院文教基金會
www.inpr.org.tw/inprc/pub/jounals/130
7.行政院文化建設委員會,2004,92年藝文活動統計-台閩地區各縣市藝文活動統計www4.cca.gov.tw/artsquery/08-all.htm
8. 行政院主計處網站http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas01/93btab/93b140.htm。
9. 參考教育部網站http://www.edu.tw。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
91932006
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091932006
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 樓永堅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lo, Yung chienen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳錦誠zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Chin-chengen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳錦誠zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Chin-chengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 14:50:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 14:50:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 14:50:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0091932006en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35363-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91932006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 公部門站在主要的資金提供者,並鼓勵企業加入贊助行列,支持表演藝術團體的持續發展。但是,有限資源面對眾多的申請者,資源提供者(公部門以及企業部門),大都採取被動的態度,受理申請。這種傳統的資源提供模式,採取名額多、補助額度少的方式。因此,為爭取更多的資源,表演藝術團體必須在不同部門之間奔走,尋求資金挹注的最佳組合。此一模式,長期以來,造成資金提供者與資金需求者(表演團體),雙方在資源交換的效率低、交換後雙方都不滿意;就社會行銷的觀點而言,如此的交換模式耗損相當高的交易成本,資源無法有效的整合與運用,無法創造最大的社會效益。使得公部門、企業、表演團體都急於尋找資源有效運用的良方。
以發掘商業組織為對象的創業投資,運用到以非營利組織為對象。透過策略管理的方式慎選投資標的,建構可以創造高社會報酬的計畫,稱為公益創投。本研究假設,公益創投可以運用在以創意為核心表演藝藝術產業,探討表演團體接受公益創投的可行性。公益創投主動尋求投資之標的,長期參與不僅投注資金,也投入人力以及各項資源。並要求達成設定的績效目標以及價值與利潤的回饋。
經由文獻探討,並以實務經驗者參與焦點座談的方式,實際模擬遴選準則以及實務上可能之標的等。發現對於公益創投的模式,表演藝術團體是有條件的接受,在尊重藝術創作的前提下,它提供一套系統化的投資方式,提昇資源應用的效率,創造更高的社會效益。讓有潛力的團體,能夠在需要的時機被主動發掘,成為重點投資的對象。是傳統藝術資源運用模式之外的另一項具有策略性的選項。建議,在現有的資源中提出一定的比例,採行公益創投的模式重點投資值得發展的計畫。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The public sector plays a prominent part as the primary funding channels for performing arts groups as well as appeals to the private sector for joining the funding game. Limited funding resources have proven to be challenged for numerous fund-seeking applicants. The resource providers (public and private funding sectors) have been known to take on a passive attitude—accepting, assessing and allocating sent applications. This traditional interaction frequently adapts the “more dividers, less grant” model. In turn, performing arts groups spend more time circling different funding departments, in search of the best funding combination to meet their needs.

This long-adopted method has caused low efficiency on both the funding providers and the funding seekers. Both parties rarely exchange their resources and even when do so, rarely are both parties satisfied with the mode of exchange. Taking the view of social marketing , this exchange pattern not only results in transaction costs, resources are left ineffectively integrated and therefore fails in reaching the best social beneficiary. Foreseeing hazardous future in funding, public sectors, enterprises and performing arts groups are jumping to find best applicable measures to resource integration.

Seeking venture capitals to invest in nonprofit organizations. Weighing through strategic management and invest in the chosen organization to create high social rewards is “Venture Philanthropy”. This study hypothesizes Venture Philanthropy can be exercised on performing arts industry and based on this hypothesis, the study will discuss the feasibility of performing arts groups accepting Venture Philanthropy. Venture Philanthropy actively seeks investment target which not only participates in capital for the long run, but also puts forth human resources and other related assets. Investors must ask for the achievement of the assumed goal and the feeback of values and profits.

In-depth research in literatures, seminars of administrators in performing arts groups, simulating panel selection with prospective invested candidates, this study finds Venture Philanthropy module is conditionally accepted by performing arts groups. Under the premises that investors trully respect artistic originalities , Mode of Venture Philanthropy provides a systematic investing frame and by increasing the efficiency of applied resources, highly beneficial results are introduced to the society. The module allows potential arts groups to be actively sought out in need time and become key investments. This boasts another strategic opportunity outside the traditional interaction between performing arts groups and funding sectors. In conclusion, it is highly suggested that a certain percentage of the existing resources can be released as Venture Philanthropy module to amplify deserving and potential groups .
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 誌謝 ----------------------------------- I
摘要 ---------------------------------- II
英文摘要 ----------------------------- III
目錄 -------------------------------- V
表目錄 -------------------------------- 0
圖目錄 -------------------------------- 0
第一章 緒論 ------------------------- 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 --------------- 1
第二節 研究目的 --------------------- 4
第三節 研究對象 --------------------- 5
第二章 文獻探討與現況分析-------------- 7
第一節 表演藝術與產業 --------------- 7
第二節 表演藝術資源的整合與運用------16
第三節 企業贊助表演藝術藝術 ---------37
第四節 表演藝術資源運用的瓶頸--------49
第五節 公益創投與表演藝術 -----------54
第三章 研究方法 -----------------------67
第四章 資料分析與結果------------------71
第一節 表演藝術團體面對資源不足的作為71
第二節 以公益創投模式投資表演團體----73
第五章 結論與建議 ---------------------90
第一節 結論 -------------------------90
第二節 研究建議 -------------------- 93
第三節 對公部門之建議 -------------- 95
第四節 對表演藝術團體之建議 -------- 96
第五節 後續研究建議 ---------------- 98
參考文獻 --------------------------- 100
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 45693 bytes-
dc.format.extent 78309 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80333 bytes-
dc.format.extent 64212 bytes-
dc.format.extent 131953 bytes-
dc.format.extent 465913 bytes-
dc.format.extent 115775 bytes-
dc.format.extent 374338 bytes-
dc.format.extent 184734 bytes-
dc.format.extent 108657 bytes-
dc.format.extent 259906 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091932006en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公益創投zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 表演藝術團體zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 非營利組織zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業贊助zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 藝術補助zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Venture Philanthropyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Performing Arts Groupsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Non-profit Organizationsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Private Fundingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Arts Subsidyen_US
dc.title (題名) 公益創投之可行性研究--以表演藝術團體為例zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.中華民國表演藝術協會,2003年,藝文贊助Q&A。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.中華民國表演藝術協會,2005年,台灣地區表演藝術產業現況調查。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.吳思華,1998,策略九說,台北:麥田出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.吳思華,2004年,「創意與經營需相輔相成」,天下雜誌5月出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.李政達,1997年,"我國創業投資事業之現況與政策檢討",經濟情勢 暨評論季刊,經濟部研究發展委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.金玉琦,2003,「非營利組織資源開發新途徑-公益創投與社會企業之可行性研究」,南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。P.21zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.施顏祥 (2002). 文化創意產業發展計畫. 挑戰2008國家重點發展計畫, 台北, 行政院經濟建設委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.林曼麗策劃,2004年,「藝企風華」總論篇,典藏出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.曹富生,2004年,動腦雜誌,8月號第340輯。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.葉一璋、葉上葆,2003年「公益創投:非營利組織再造的新契機」,行政院研究發展考核委員會,第三部門產業化新趨勢研討會會議實錄。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.漢寶德,2002年,「各國藝術資助政策的探討」,中央日報副刊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.劉常勇,1997年,"如何成為相中千馬駒的伯樂—創業投資評估決策程序",會計研究月刊,134期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.謝瑩潔,2001,我國藝術補助機制之檢討—以組織、運作及財源籌措為例,台灣大學公共行政組碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.聶光炎,2000年,劇場設計16答問,原載於表演藝術雜誌,第100期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Bruno S. Frey,Arts & Economics:Analysis & Cultural Policy(2000)當藝術遇上經濟一個案分析與文化政策,2003年,典藏出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Bruno S Frey(2002年) 創造性、政府與藝術Creativity, Government and the Arts,漢寶德譯。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Christine Letts、William Ryan and Allen Gossman,「Virtuous Capital:What Foundations Can Learn From Venture Capitalists向創投借鏡:基金會與創投公司的比較」, Harvard Business Review哈佛商業論叢。2000,台北:天下遠見出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.David Throsby,Economics and Culture(2001)文化經濟學,2003年,典藏出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.DCMS,2001,2001Creative Industries Mapping Documents UK,p.5。轉引自「文化創意產業概況分析調查」,民國91年,經濟建設委員會出版zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Harry Hillman-Chartrand (c) and Claire McCaughey(1989),The Arm’s Length Principle and the Arts: An International Perspective,漢寶德譯。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.John Pick原著,1988,(藝術與公共政策),江靜玲譯,台北—桂冠圖書股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Richard Caves,Creative Industries:Contracts Between Art and Commerce(2000)文化創意產業:以契約達成藝術與商業的媒合,2003年,典藏出版zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、 參考網站zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.財團法人國家文化藝術基金會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) www.ncafroc.org.tw/index.aspzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.行政院文化建設委員會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) www.cca.gov.twzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.英國藝術與企業協會Arts &Business UK(A&B)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) www.workingwithartists.co.uk/#zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.美國藝術與企業協會Arts& Business Council Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) www.potomacbca.orgzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.澳洲企業藝術基金會Australia Business Arts Foundationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) www.abaf.org.au/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.財團法人國策研究院文教基金會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) www.inpr.org.tw/inprc/pub/jounals/130zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.行政院文化建設委員會,2004,92年藝文活動統計-台閩地區各縣市藝文活動統計www4.cca.gov.tw/artsquery/08-all.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. 行政院主計處網站http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas01/93btab/93b140.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. 參考教育部網站http://www.edu.tw。zh_TW