dc.contributor.advisor | 溫肇東 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 王臣名 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 王臣名 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2006 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 14:58:17 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 14:58:17 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 14:58:17 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0092932928 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35418 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 92932928 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 95 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 全球產業走向創新導向的產業模式,企業所強調研發創新的創新型經濟。因此,厚植研發能量,以有效提升企業的產品研發活動之附加價值,是產業長期面對全球競爭重要的策略要素。現代企業的組織在面對複雜多變的動態競爭環境中,一般任務性質的團隊需要創新,對於肩負產品競爭力重責大任的研發團隊更是如此。以專案團隊為基礎組織結構在現今的產業中已越來越常見,特別是在電子資訊產業中,日常的營運幾乎是以專案團隊為主軸,而如何增進研發團隊的績效,已成為業界最重視的課題。國內對創造力的研究多以個人層次的衡量為主,研究的對象多集中在教育界,廣告行銷或某些特定的研發機構為主。國內學者們對探討團隊創新績效之實證研究甚少,特別是對特定企業研發部門採用客觀性的績效衡量方式;因此引發本研究對跨個人層級與團隊層級探討影響團隊創造力及影響團隊研發績效因素的興趣。本研究架構理論來自於基本的「刺激-有機體-反應」(SOR)理論,在此研究架構下團隊的創新氛圍是刺激,研發人員與團隊是反應刺激的有機體,而研發人員的工作動機、創造力傾向是反應。本研究採用匯合取向(confluence approaches)的觀點來研究創造力,以T. M. Amabile、M. Csikzenmihaly以及R. J. Sternberg等三位當代以匯合取向研究創造力的重要創造力理論大師的理論架構為基礎,強調創造力發生與組織的氛圍、組織氛圍與個人的交互作用以及工作者動機傾向有關,作為本研究探討創造力的理論觀點,來探討電子資訊公司研發團隊工作績效與團隊工作動機、團隊創造力傾向及團隊創新氛圍之關係。本研究歸納並探討性提出下列結論:1. 團隊內在工作動機與團隊外在工作動機對團隊創造力傾向及團隊研發績效有顯著正向關係。2. 團隊內在動機對團隊創新氛圍與團隊創造力傾向之關係具中介效果不顯著,團隊外在動機對團隊創新氛圍與團隊創造力傾向之關係具中介效果;團隊內在動機對團隊創新氛圍與團隊研發績效之關係具中介效果不顯著,團隊外在動機對團隊創新氛圍與團隊研發績效之關係具中介效果。3. 團隊創造力傾向對團隊內在動機與團隊研發績效之關係具中介效果,團隊創造力傾向對團隊外在動機與團隊研發績效之關係具中介效果。4. 團隊創造力傾向對團隊創新氛圍與團隊研發績效之關係具中介效果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論.................................................................................................... 1第一節 研究背景...................................................................................... 1第二節 研究動機與目的......................................................................... 3第三節 研究流程...................................................................................... 5第二章 文獻探討.................................................................. 6第一節 創造力.......................................................................................... 6第二節 工作動機與創造力的關係…................................................... 19第三節 環境對創造力之影響….......................................................... 24第四節 團隊創新氛圍........................................................................... 28第五節 研發團隊績效............................................................................ 37第六節 各構念的互動關係….................................................……… 41第三章 研究方法........................................................................................ 53第一節 研究假設與架構........................................................................ 53第二節 研究對象…............................................................ 55第三節 抽樣方法…............................................................ 59第四節 問卷設計….............................................................................. 59第四章 資料分析與研究結果......................................................... 61第一節 研究變項之描述性統計分析……………………………………… 61第二節 共同方法變異分析…………………….…………………………… 64第三節 信度分析……………………………………………………………..64第四節 因素分析…………………………….……..…………………..…… 68第五節 效度分析……...…………................................................................ 73第六節 團隊層次資料產生與一致性檢定……………………………………74第七節 分析與研究結果…………………………………………………..….. 76第八節 假設驗證結果................................................................................ 84第五章 研究結論與建議................................................................. 85第一節 研究結果討論........................................................................ 85第二節 可能研究貢獻…………………………………..……………………92第三節 管理函意..................................................................................... 93第四節 研究限制..................................................................................... 97第五節 後續研究建議............................................................................ 97參考文獻.................................................................................................. 98中文部分英文部分附錄: 調查問卷......................................................................................103 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 15113 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 17438 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 16012 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 21456 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 34293 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 165834 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 34117 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 254171 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 47357 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 30851 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 43826 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092932928 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 工作動機 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 創造力傾向 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 團隊創新氛圍 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 團隊研發績效 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 團隊創新氛圍、團隊工作動機及團隊創造力傾向對團隊研發績效關聯性之實證研究 -- 以K公司研發團隊為例 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 壹、 中文部份 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李乙明、李淑貞 譯 (2006) 。創造力Ⅰ. 理論,作者:Robert J. Sternberg,五南圖書(股)公司,台灣台北 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李乙明、李淑貞 譯 (2006)。 創造力ⅠI. 應用,作者:Robert J. Sternberg,五南圖書(股)公司,台灣台北 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 杜明城 譯 (1999) 創造力 作者: 米哈里. 契克森米哈賴 (Mihaly Csiksentmihalyi),, 時報文化出版 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪蘭 譯 (1999)。 不同凡想。 Sternburg, R. J (1999),台北:遠流。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張定綺 譯 (1999) 快樂,從心開始。 Flow: the psychology of optimal experience, Mihaly Csiksentmihalyi(1990)台北:天下文化。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李宗倫(2004)。個人創造力歷程之研究 — 動機理論之整合觀點。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文,未出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳靜吉、林偉文、林士郁、陳秋秀、曾敬梅、王涵儀等(2002)。國際創造力教育發展的趨勢。資優教育研究,2(1),1-26。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析,五南圖書(股)公司,台灣台北 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱皓政(2002)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐:另一件國王的新衣。應用心理研究,15,191-224 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 周惠卿(2000)。創造力攸關之內外在環境特質與創造力投資策略之關係-學童與廠商跨領域之比較研究。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。台北市:教育部 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳昭儒(2003)。工作動機、工作投入與工作績效之關聯性研究-以某鋼鐵公司KT 廠為例。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 詹志禹(2002)。「創造力」的定義與創造力的發展:兒童會創造嗎?教育研究,100,117-124。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 詹志禹(2004b)。台灣發明家的內在動機、思考取向及環境機會-演化論的觀點。教育與心理研究,27(4),775-806 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉玉珠(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),95-122。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉曉雯(1998)。創造力工作環境特質對組織創租行為影響關係之研究-兼論內外在動機與資訊科技基磐特徵的作用。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 饒瑞霖(2000)。創造力競爭環境、個人內在動機與創造力工作環境關係之探討-學童與廠商跨領域之比較。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 貳、英文部份 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221-233 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential definition. Journal of Personality and Social Creativity | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M., B. A. Hennessey, and B. S. Grossman (1986), Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14-23 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T.M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations, in Staw, BM. and Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, pp.40. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T.M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), pp.1154-1184. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T.M. (1995) "KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity," Instrument Published by the Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro NC. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T.M., Hill Karl G. Hennessey Beth A. & Tighe Elizabeth M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity In Content. CO: Westview Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., and Herron, H.(1996). “ Assessing the work environment for creativity ”, Academy of Management Journal, 5, 39, 1154-1184. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M. (1997a). Entrepreneurial Creativity Through Motivational Synergy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 18-31 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M. (1997b). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, N.R., West, M.A., (1998), “Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 19, p. 235-258 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY: Harper Collins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | James, L. R., L. A. James and D. K. Ashe, 1990, “The Meaning of Organizations: The Role of Cognition and Values”, In B. Schneider(Ed.), Organizational Climate and Culture, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 40-84. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mayer, R.E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research, In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449-460). New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mitchell T R, Silver W S. Individual and Group Goals When Workers Are Interdependent: Effects on Task Strategies and Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(2):185~193 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nonaka, I., Nagata, A., Kusunoki, K., (1998). Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings. Organization Science, Volume 9, Issue 6 (June 1998), Pages: 699 - 718 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York: Cambridge University Press | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pirola-Merlo, A., Bain, PG., Mann, L., 2001. The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating a cross people and time Small Group Research, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reicher, A.E, Schneider, B (1990), "Climate and culture: an evolution of constructs", in Schneider, B. (Eds),Organisational Climate and Culture, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA., . | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rousseau, D. M. 1988. The Construction of Climate in Organizational Research, In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology: 139–159. Chichester, England: Wiley. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schnei Reicher, A. E. & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and Culture: An Evolution of Constructs, in B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational Climate and Culture, SF: Jossey-Base Inc | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sternberg, R. J. (1991). An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development, Human Development, 34(1), 1-31. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T.I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity, New York: Free press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. L. (1996). Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 77-688. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sternberg, R. J., (1999 Ed.) Handbook of Creativity, New York: Cambridge University Press | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sternberg, R.J. & Lubart, T.I.(1999). The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative Self-efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zhou, J., and George, J.M, (2001),When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity:Encouraging the expression of voice., Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp. 682-696 | zh_TW |