學術產出-Theses

題名 資訊委外關係管理之研究- 企業如何利用資訊委外獲得最大綜效
Reap From IT Outsourcing -- Effective Relationship Management
作者 吳愷暉
Wu, Kai-Hui
貢獻者 尚孝純
Shang, Shari
吳愷暉
Wu, Kai-Hui
關鍵詞 資訊科技委外
委外關係
市場變化
資訊中心支援能力
委外期望
Information Technology Outsourcing
Outsourcing Relationship
Business Dynamics
IT Competence
Outsourcing Expectation
日期 2007
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 15:01:20 (UTC+8)
摘要 摘要
在資訊科技服務的市場,資訊科技委外(ITO)在市場佔有顯著的地位。過去有許多的報告研究資訊委外廠商的選擇,以及有效的合約管理方法,鮮少針對企業資訊委外合約簽訂之後,企業與委外伙伴之間的互動進行研究。然而依據許多個案報導案例顯示,大多數委外案例的失敗,不是由於雙方關係管理的不適當,就是無法滿足委外企業最初委外目標的期盼。
我們使用在過去的二十六年中臺灣資訊科技委外市場的四十個案例來研究探討如何利用資訊委外關係管理來獲取預期綜效。經過分析與研究,發現四種資訊科技委外的合作關係。這四種合作關係型態分別為:夥伴關係(Partner)、倚賴關係(Dependent)、隨需存取關係(Utility)、以及附屬關係(Subordinate)。不同的委外關係含概了不同的委外服務內容,也含概了不同的關係管理。夥伴的合作關係,企業的期望不止雙方合作達成企業的策略目標,同時也期望委外廠商支援科技創新而提升企業的市場競爭力;倚賴的合作關係,企業對委外廠商支援達成企業策略目標高度倚靠;隨需存取的合作關係,企業期望資源的取得是隨需存取,完全以成本考量;附屬的合作關係,企業則認為該委外廠商僅僅是依附於資訊中心的下包廠商,委外與否完全由企業的資訊中心自行決定。此外,本研究顯示不同的委外關係是由於不同的委外關係無法達成期盼,以及無法交付最終策略利益、經濟利益、或資訊科技利益而終止。
本論文透過文獻探討與深度個案研究,來瞭解影響不同合作關係資訊科技委外的相關因素,和期盼的資訊科技委外的結果。不同型態資訊科技委外關係的管理需要瞭解委外企業對所需服務的期望,以及在合作期間,彼此關係的管理需不斷的注意市場以及資訊科技的變化而提出相對應的策略來因應彼此合作關係,以期從中獲取最大效益。
關鍵字:資訊科技委外,委外關係,市場變化,資訊中心支援能力,委外期望。
Information Technology Outsourcing (ITO) has gained a big share of the world IT service market. There are many studies about ITO vendor selection and contract management but a lack of understanding of the after-contract practice between the ITO parties. According to reported cases many outsourcing failures were due to either improper relationship management or unable to meet customer expectations. For effective management of this long-term inter-organizational relationship there is a need for understanding the features, affecting factors, expectations and termination of ITO relationship so that the desired outcomes can be achieved and relationship can be sustained throughout the life of the ITO.

The above propositions were tested on all existing and changed ITO projects in Taiwan in the past twenty five years. A total of fourty cases were examined and the results show four kinds of IT outsourcing relationship: dependent, utility, partner and subordinate. Different kinds of ITO relationship have different expectations for the ITO services and require different management on the relationships. The dependent type ITO customers rely highly on ITO vendors for supporting strategic moves. The utility ITO customers use ITO as a utility and measure vendors by cost performance. The partner type ITO customers consult vendor for business strategic moves and urge vendor for technology innovation. The subordinate type ITO customers consider ITO vendors as a sub-contractor of IT department and leave decisions to the IT department. Those terminated cases were mainly due to conflicts in the expected and delivered outcome in the three ITO benefit areas.

This study provides useful instrument for assessing major ITO factors and understanding expected ITO outcomes. ITO relationship management requires a careful understanding of the expected benefits of the service and continuous monitoring of the business and IT environment.

Keywords : Information Technology Outsourcing;Outsourcing Relationship;Business Dynamics;IT Competence;Outsourcing Expectation。
參考文獻 
壹、 英文部分
1.Anderson, E., and Weitz, B. (1989). "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads." Marketing Science, 8(4), 310-323.
2.Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. (1990). "A Model Of Distributor Firm And Manufacturer Firm Working P." Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42.
3.Ang, S., and Straub, D. W. (1998). "Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry." MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535.
4.Aron, R., Clemons, E., and Reddi, S. (2005). "Just Right Outsourcing: Understanding and Managing Risk." Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 37-55.
5.Auberl, B., Patry, M., and Rivard, S. (1998). "Assessing the Risk of IT Outsourcing." Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 685-691.
6.Bensaou, M., and Venkatraman, N. (1995). "Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: A Comparison between US and Japanese Automakers." Management Science, 41(9), 1471-1492.
7.Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). "A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation." MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169.
8.Chaudhury, A., Nam, K., and Rao, H. R. (1995). "Management of information systems outsourcing: A bidding perspective." Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 131.
9.CIO. (2003). "When the Mission Changes, IT Does Too ; For Washington Mutual, a passion for customers prompted the bank to reinsource all of its IT functions that directly affected its customers." CIO, 16(10), 1.
10.Cross, J. (1995). "IT Outsourcing: British Petroleum`s Competitive Approach." Long Range Planning, 28(4), 128-128.
11.Cullen, S., and Willcocks, L. (2003). Intelligent IT outsourcing: eight building blocks to success, Butterworth-Heinemann.
12.Currie, W., and Willcocks, L. (1998). "Analysing four types of IT sourcing decisions in the context of scale, client/supplier interdependency and risk mitigation." Information Systems Journal, 8(2), 119-143.
13.De Looff, L. (1995). "Information systems outsourcing decision making: a framework, organizational theories and case studies." JIT. Journal of information technology(Print), 10(4), 281-297.
14.Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., and Jayatilaka, B. (2004). "Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature." ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(4), 6-102.
15.DiRomualdo, A., and Gurbaxani, V. (1998). "Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing." Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 67.
16.Earl, M. J. (1996). "The Risks of Outsourcing IT." Sloan Management Review, 37(3), 26.
17.Feeny, D. F., and Willcocks, L. P. (1998). "Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology." Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 9.
18.Fitzgerald, G., and Willcocks, L. (1994). Outsourcing Information Technology: Contracts and the Client/vendor Relationship., Oxford Institute of Information Management.
19.Goles, T., and Chin, W. W. (2005). "Information Systems Outsourcing Relationship Factors: Detailed Conceptualization and Initial Evidence." Database for Advances in Information Systems, 36(4), 47.
20.Grover, V., and Teng, J. (1993). "The Decision to Outsource Information Systems Functions." Journal of Systems Management, 44(11), 34-38.
21.Grover, V., Cheon, M. J., and Teng, J. T. C. (1996). "The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions." Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 89.
22.Heide, J., and John, G. (1990). "Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships." Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36.
23.Henderson, J. C. (1990). "Plugging Into Strategic Partnerships: The Critical IS Conne." Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 7.
24.Huang, B. (2006) “Service Market Opportunity Newly Update” IBM xGMV.
25.Huber, R. L. (1993). "How Continental Bank outsourced its "crown jewels"." Harvard Business Review, 71(1), 121.
26.Kern, T., and Willcocks, L. (2002). "Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: the interaction approach." European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 3-19.
27.Kern, T., and Willcocks, L. (2002). The Relationship Advantage: Information Technologies, Sourcing, and Management, Oxford University Press.
28.Klepper, R. (1995). "Outsourcing relationships." Managing information technology investments with outsourcing table of contents, 218-243.
29.Konsynski, B. R., and McFarlan, F. W. "Information Partnerships - Shared Data, Shared Scale." Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 114.
30.Lacity, M., and Hirschheim, R. (1993). "The Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon." Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 73-86.
31.Lacity, M., and Hirschheim, R. (1993). Information Systems Outsourcing; Myths, Metaphors, and Realities, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.
32.Lacity, M. C., and Willcocks, L. P. (1998). "An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience." MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 363.
33.Lee, J. (2001). "The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success." Information & Management, 38(5), 323-335.
34.Lee, J.N., and Kim, Y.G. (1999). "Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing: Conceptual framework and empirical validation." Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29.
35.Levina, N., and Ross, J. W. (2003). "From the vendor`s perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing(1)(2)." MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331.
36.Loh, L., and Venkatraman, N.(1992) “Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect,” Information Systems Research (4:3), 1992, pp. 334-358.
37.Marcolin, B., and McLellan, K. (1998). "Effective IT Outsourcing Arrangements." Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 654-665.
38.McFarlan, F., and Nolan, R. (1995). "How to Manage an IT Outsourcing Alliance." Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 9-23.
39.MICHELL, V. (1997). "The IT outsourcing market-place: vendors and their selection." Journal of Information Technology, 12(3), 223-237.
40.Mieghem, J. A. V. (1999). "Coordinating investment, production, and subcontracting." Management Science, 45(7), 954.
41.Mohr, J., and Spekman, R. (1994). "Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques." Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152.
42.Morgan, R., and Hunt, S. (1994). "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing." Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
43.Nam, K., Rajagopalan, S., Rao, H. R., and Chaudhury, A. (1996). "A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing." Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 39(7), 36.
44.Overby, B. S. (2005). "Backsourcing Pain ; JPMorgan Chase`s decision to first outsource IT and then bring it back in-house stands as a cautionary tale for any CIO considering an outsourcing megadeal." CIO, 18(22), 1.
45.Overby, S. (2003). "In or Out? To outsource or to insource: Here`s how two resourceful CIOs made their decisions." CIO-FRAMINGHAM MA-, 16(21), 75-78.
46.Paul , J., Derek , S., and Brad , S. (2005). "The Global Outsourcing Marketplace:Key Data, Forecasts & Trends." Kennedy Information.
47.Pine, B. (1993). Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press.
48.Richmond, W. B., and Seidmann, A. (1993). "Software development outsourcing contract: Structure and business value." Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 57.
49.Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., and Goodhue, D. L. (1996). "Develop Long-Term Competitiveness Through IT Assets." Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31.
50.Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., and Grover, V. (2003). "Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary Firms1." MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237.
51.Scarbrough, H. (1995). "Blackboxes, hostages and prisoners." Organization Studies, 16(6), 991-1019.
52.Sommer, R. (2003). "Business process flexibility: a driver for outsourcing." Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(3), 177-183.
53.Weill, P., and Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: how market leaders capitalize on information technology, Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA, USA.
54.Willcocks, L., and Kern, T. (1998). "IT outsourcing as strategic partnering: the case of the UK Inland Revenue." Space, 7(1), 29-45.
55.Willcocks, L., Fitzgerald, G., and Feeny, D. (1995). "Outsourcing IT: The strategic implications." Long Range Planning, 28(5), 59.
56.Willcocks, L., Lacity, M., and Kern, T. (1999). "Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: longitudinal case research at LISA." Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(3), 285-314.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
93932609
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093932609
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 尚孝純zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Shang, Sharien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 吳愷暉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wu, Kai-Huien_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳愷暉zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Kai-Huien_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 15:01:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 15:01:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 15:01:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093932609en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35436-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93932609zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 摘要
在資訊科技服務的市場,資訊科技委外(ITO)在市場佔有顯著的地位。過去有許多的報告研究資訊委外廠商的選擇,以及有效的合約管理方法,鮮少針對企業資訊委外合約簽訂之後,企業與委外伙伴之間的互動進行研究。然而依據許多個案報導案例顯示,大多數委外案例的失敗,不是由於雙方關係管理的不適當,就是無法滿足委外企業最初委外目標的期盼。
我們使用在過去的二十六年中臺灣資訊科技委外市場的四十個案例來研究探討如何利用資訊委外關係管理來獲取預期綜效。經過分析與研究,發現四種資訊科技委外的合作關係。這四種合作關係型態分別為:夥伴關係(Partner)、倚賴關係(Dependent)、隨需存取關係(Utility)、以及附屬關係(Subordinate)。不同的委外關係含概了不同的委外服務內容,也含概了不同的關係管理。夥伴的合作關係,企業的期望不止雙方合作達成企業的策略目標,同時也期望委外廠商支援科技創新而提升企業的市場競爭力;倚賴的合作關係,企業對委外廠商支援達成企業策略目標高度倚靠;隨需存取的合作關係,企業期望資源的取得是隨需存取,完全以成本考量;附屬的合作關係,企業則認為該委外廠商僅僅是依附於資訊中心的下包廠商,委外與否完全由企業的資訊中心自行決定。此外,本研究顯示不同的委外關係是由於不同的委外關係無法達成期盼,以及無法交付最終策略利益、經濟利益、或資訊科技利益而終止。
本論文透過文獻探討與深度個案研究,來瞭解影響不同合作關係資訊科技委外的相關因素,和期盼的資訊科技委外的結果。不同型態資訊科技委外關係的管理需要瞭解委外企業對所需服務的期望,以及在合作期間,彼此關係的管理需不斷的注意市場以及資訊科技的變化而提出相對應的策略來因應彼此合作關係,以期從中獲取最大效益。
關鍵字:資訊科技委外,委外關係,市場變化,資訊中心支援能力,委外期望。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Information Technology Outsourcing (ITO) has gained a big share of the world IT service market. There are many studies about ITO vendor selection and contract management but a lack of understanding of the after-contract practice between the ITO parties. According to reported cases many outsourcing failures were due to either improper relationship management or unable to meet customer expectations. For effective management of this long-term inter-organizational relationship there is a need for understanding the features, affecting factors, expectations and termination of ITO relationship so that the desired outcomes can be achieved and relationship can be sustained throughout the life of the ITO.

The above propositions were tested on all existing and changed ITO projects in Taiwan in the past twenty five years. A total of fourty cases were examined and the results show four kinds of IT outsourcing relationship: dependent, utility, partner and subordinate. Different kinds of ITO relationship have different expectations for the ITO services and require different management on the relationships. The dependent type ITO customers rely highly on ITO vendors for supporting strategic moves. The utility ITO customers use ITO as a utility and measure vendors by cost performance. The partner type ITO customers consult vendor for business strategic moves and urge vendor for technology innovation. The subordinate type ITO customers consider ITO vendors as a sub-contractor of IT department and leave decisions to the IT department. Those terminated cases were mainly due to conflicts in the expected and delivered outcome in the three ITO benefit areas.

This study provides useful instrument for assessing major ITO factors and understanding expected ITO outcomes. ITO relationship management requires a careful understanding of the expected benefits of the service and continuous monitoring of the business and IT environment.

Keywords : Information Technology Outsourcing;Outsourcing Relationship;Business Dynamics;IT Competence;Outsourcing Expectation。
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、 緒論----------------------------- 1
第一節、 研究背景與動機-------------------- 1
第二節、 研究目的------------------------- 2
第二章、 文獻探討------------------------- 3
第一節、 資訊委外的環境-------------------- 3
第二節、 資訊委外的定義-------------------- 5
第三節、 關係的定義------------------------ 6
第四節、 影響委外關係的因素----------------- 7
第五節、 委外的期望------------------------ 12
第六節、 委外關係終止的因素----------------- 14
第三章、 研究方法------------------------- 16
第一節、 研究方法------------------------- 16
第二節、 研究流程------------------------- 17
第三節、 研究個案背景說明------------------ 19
第四章、 研究結果------------------------- 25
第一節、 企業採取資訊委外的合作關係有那些不同型式---- 25
第二節、 企業對於資訊委外所採取不同型式的合作關係之期望為何---- 29
第三節、 企業可能在何種因素下而終止資訊委外合作關係--- 31
第五章、 研究發現------------------------- 32
第一節、 企業採取資訊委外的合作關係有那些不同型式---- 32
第二節、 企業對於資訊委外所採取不同型式的合作關係之期望為何---- 39
第三節、 企業可能在何種因素下而終止資訊委外合作關係--- 42
第六章、 結論與建議------------------------ 46
第一節、 研究結果------------------------- 46
第二節、 研究貢獻------------------------- 47
第三節、 研究限制------------------------- 49
第四節、 後續研究建議---------------------- 50
參考文獻 ------------------------------- 52
壹、 英文部分------------------------- 52
附錄一: 研究問卷-------------------------- 56
附錄二: 資訊委外關係終止研究問卷------------ 61
附錄三: 產業專家訪談結果------------------- 62
附錄四: 案例委外關係分佈------------------- 77
壹、案例分佈圖列示意:--------------------- 77
貳、案例分佈表列示意:--------------------- 78
附錄五: 代表性案例訪談結果 ---------------- 79


圖次

圖2-1 全世界委外市場(KENNEDY INFORMATION, 2005)-- 3
圖2-2 全世界ITO市場(KENNEDY INFORMATION, 2005)-- 4
圖2-3 台灣委外市場(IBM XGMV 2H06, 2006)---------- 4
圖3-1 研究流程圖---------------------------------- 18
圖4-1 委外關係之分類圖----------------------------- 27
圖5-1 委外關係型態分類圖--------------------------- 33
圖5-2委外關係期望之分析圖-------------------------- 39
圖5-3 導至終止委外關係之分析圖---------------------- 42


表次

表格 3 1 資訊委外超過三年的企業--------------------- 19
表格 3 2 受訪者背景分析---------------------------- 24
表格 4 1 影響委外關係與合作關係之結果---------------- 25
表格 4 2 推論一及推論二之驗證----------------------- 26
表格 4 3 委外關係與合作關係之結果------------------- 27
表格 4 4影響委外關係與企業期待之結果----------------- 29
表格 4 5 推論三及推論四之驗證----------------------- 29
表格 4 6 委外關係與企業期待之結果------------------- 30
表格 4-7終止委外關係之原因 ------------------------ 31
表格 5 1 影響委外關係與合作關係之相關性-------------- 37
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 44855 bytes-
dc.format.extent 79449 bytes-
dc.format.extent 70160 bytes-
dc.format.extent 32850 bytes-
dc.format.extent 64639 bytes-
dc.format.extent 97291 bytes-
dc.format.extent 213738 bytes-
dc.format.extent 153837 bytes-
dc.format.extent 122433 bytes-
dc.format.extent 176926 bytes-
dc.format.extent 133970 bytes-
dc.format.extent 63347 bytes-
dc.format.extent 337459 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093932609en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資訊科技委外zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 委外關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 市場變化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資訊中心支援能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 委外期望zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Information Technology Outsourcingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Outsourcing Relationshipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Business Dynamicsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) IT Competenceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Outsourcing Expectationen_US
dc.title (題名) 資訊委外關係管理之研究- 企業如何利用資訊委外獲得最大綜效zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Reap From IT Outsourcing -- Effective Relationship Managementen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Anderson, E., and Weitz, B. (1989). "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads." Marketing Science, 8(4), 310-323.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. (1990). "A Model Of Distributor Firm And Manufacturer Firm Working P." Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Ang, S., and Straub, D. W. (1998). "Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry." MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Aron, R., Clemons, E., and Reddi, S. (2005). "Just Right Outsourcing: Understanding and Managing Risk." Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 37-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Auberl, B., Patry, M., and Rivard, S. (1998). "Assessing the Risk of IT Outsourcing." Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 685-691.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Bensaou, M., and Venkatraman, N. (1995). "Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: A Comparison between US and Japanese Automakers." Management Science, 41(9), 1471-1492.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). "A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation." MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Chaudhury, A., Nam, K., and Rao, H. R. (1995). "Management of information systems outsourcing: A bidding perspective." Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.CIO. (2003). "When the Mission Changes, IT Does Too ; For Washington Mutual, a passion for customers prompted the bank to reinsource all of its IT functions that directly affected its customers." CIO, 16(10), 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Cross, J. (1995). "IT Outsourcing: British Petroleum`s Competitive Approach." Long Range Planning, 28(4), 128-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Cullen, S., and Willcocks, L. (2003). Intelligent IT outsourcing: eight building blocks to success, Butterworth-Heinemann.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Currie, W., and Willcocks, L. (1998). "Analysing four types of IT sourcing decisions in the context of scale, client/supplier interdependency and risk mitigation." Information Systems Journal, 8(2), 119-143.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.De Looff, L. (1995). "Information systems outsourcing decision making: a framework, organizational theories and case studies." JIT. Journal of information technology(Print), 10(4), 281-297.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., and Jayatilaka, B. (2004). "Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature." ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(4), 6-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.DiRomualdo, A., and Gurbaxani, V. (1998). "Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing." Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Earl, M. J. (1996). "The Risks of Outsourcing IT." Sloan Management Review, 37(3), 26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Feeny, D. F., and Willcocks, L. P. (1998). "Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology." Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 9.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Fitzgerald, G., and Willcocks, L. (1994). Outsourcing Information Technology: Contracts and the Client/vendor Relationship., Oxford Institute of Information Management.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Goles, T., and Chin, W. W. (2005). "Information Systems Outsourcing Relationship Factors: Detailed Conceptualization and Initial Evidence." Database for Advances in Information Systems, 36(4), 47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Grover, V., and Teng, J. (1993). "The Decision to Outsource Information Systems Functions." Journal of Systems Management, 44(11), 34-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Grover, V., Cheon, M. J., and Teng, J. T. C. (1996). "The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions." Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Heide, J., and John, G. (1990). "Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships." Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.Henderson, J. C. (1990). "Plugging Into Strategic Partnerships: The Critical IS Conne." Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 7.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.Huang, B. (2006) “Service Market Opportunity Newly Update” IBM xGMV.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.Huber, R. L. (1993). "How Continental Bank outsourced its "crown jewels"." Harvard Business Review, 71(1), 121.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.Kern, T., and Willcocks, L. (2002). "Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: the interaction approach." European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 3-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.Kern, T., and Willcocks, L. (2002). The Relationship Advantage: Information Technologies, Sourcing, and Management, Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.Klepper, R. (1995). "Outsourcing relationships." Managing information technology investments with outsourcing table of contents, 218-243.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29.Konsynski, B. R., and McFarlan, F. W. "Information Partnerships - Shared Data, Shared Scale." Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 114.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30.Lacity, M., and Hirschheim, R. (1993). "The Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon." Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 73-86.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31.Lacity, M., and Hirschheim, R. (1993). Information Systems Outsourcing; Myths, Metaphors, and Realities, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32.Lacity, M. C., and Willcocks, L. P. (1998). "An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience." MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 363.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33.Lee, J. (2001). "The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success." Information & Management, 38(5), 323-335.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34.Lee, J.N., and Kim, Y.G. (1999). "Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing: Conceptual framework and empirical validation." Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35.Levina, N., and Ross, J. W. (2003). "From the vendor`s perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing(1)(2)." MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36.Loh, L., and Venkatraman, N.(1992) “Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect,” Information Systems Research (4:3), 1992, pp. 334-358.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37.Marcolin, B., and McLellan, K. (1998). "Effective IT Outsourcing Arrangements." Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 654-665.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38.McFarlan, F., and Nolan, R. (1995). "How to Manage an IT Outsourcing Alliance." Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 9-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39.MICHELL, V. (1997). "The IT outsourcing market-place: vendors and their selection." Journal of Information Technology, 12(3), 223-237.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40.Mieghem, J. A. V. (1999). "Coordinating investment, production, and subcontracting." Management Science, 45(7), 954.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41.Mohr, J., and Spekman, R. (1994). "Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques." Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42.Morgan, R., and Hunt, S. (1994). "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing." Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43.Nam, K., Rajagopalan, S., Rao, H. R., and Chaudhury, A. (1996). "A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing." Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 39(7), 36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44.Overby, B. S. (2005). "Backsourcing Pain ; JPMorgan Chase`s decision to first outsource IT and then bring it back in-house stands as a cautionary tale for any CIO considering an outsourcing megadeal." CIO, 18(22), 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45.Overby, S. (2003). "In or Out? To outsource or to insource: Here`s how two resourceful CIOs made their decisions." CIO-FRAMINGHAM MA-, 16(21), 75-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46.Paul , J., Derek , S., and Brad , S. (2005). "The Global Outsourcing Marketplace:Key Data, Forecasts & Trends." Kennedy Information.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47.Pine, B. (1993). Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48.Richmond, W. B., and Seidmann, A. (1993). "Software development outsourcing contract: Structure and business value." Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 49.Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., and Goodhue, D. L. (1996). "Develop Long-Term Competitiveness Through IT Assets." Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 50.Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., and Grover, V. (2003). "Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary Firms1." MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51.Scarbrough, H. (1995). "Blackboxes, hostages and prisoners." Organization Studies, 16(6), 991-1019.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 52.Sommer, R. (2003). "Business process flexibility: a driver for outsourcing." Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(3), 177-183.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 53.Weill, P., and Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: how market leaders capitalize on information technology, Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 54.Willcocks, L., and Kern, T. (1998). "IT outsourcing as strategic partnering: the case of the UK Inland Revenue." Space, 7(1), 29-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 55.Willcocks, L., Fitzgerald, G., and Feeny, D. (1995). "Outsourcing IT: The strategic implications." Long Range Planning, 28(5), 59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 56.Willcocks, L., Lacity, M., and Kern, T. (1999). "Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: longitudinal case research at LISA." Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(3), 285-314.zh_TW