學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 企業參與公益活動與組織承諾影響之研究
作者 陽正中
Yang,Cheng-Chung
貢獻者 樓永堅
Lou,Yung-Chien
陽正中
Yang,Cheng-Chung
關鍵詞 企業社會責任
企業參與公益活動
組織承諾
Corporate social responsibility
Corporate Philanthropy
Organization Commitment
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 15:08:04 (UTC+8)
摘要 企業參與公益活動能增加員工對於公司的組織承諾,這也是許多企業參與公益活動的動機及目的之一。但對於員工而言,是否有影響?本研究主要探討台灣一家聯盟企業,藉由問卷調查,了解企業參與公益活動與員工組織承諾影響的相關性。
研究結果顯示,企業參與公益活動與員工組織承諾成正相關,員工對於企業參與公益活動的認同程度愈高,其組織承諾也愈高。同時,員工絕大多數都支持企業應該參與公益活動。
根據本研究的分析結果,企業要勇於參與公益活動,經由參與公益活動能增加員工對於公司的認同,員工在工作上更努力。
One of the motivations and purposes for enterprises to do Corporate Philanthropy is that they believe Corporate Philanthropy can strength the organizational commitment that employees make to the companies. Is this really true? The main point of this research is to find the causal relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and organizational commitment through use of questionnaire survey.

The result of study shows the positive causal relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Organizational Commitment. The more the enterprise is involved to Corporate Philanthropy, the more employees make organizational commitment to the company. At the same time, employees agree and support the concept of Corporate Philanthropy.

According to this conclusion, enterprises should do more Corporate Philanthropy. Corporate Philanthropy can increase the commitment the employees make to the company.
參考文獻 一.中文部分:
1.Carol L. Cone,Mark A. Feldman & Alison T. Dasilva(2003),公益與品牌之因果關係,哈佛商業評論中文版,第23期,民國92年8月,頁123-131。
2.Michael E. Porter,Mark R. Kramer(2003),企業慈善的競爭優勢,哈佛商業評論中文版,第16期,民國92年1月,頁71-85。
3.Marc Gobe (2001),高感性品牌行銷(辛巴譯),台北:藍鯨出版。
4.Marc Gobe (2004),公民品牌感性行銷(藍美貞、高仁君譯),台北市:天下雜誌出版。
5.Noreena Hertz(2003),當企業併購國家-全球資本主義與民主之死(許玉雯譯),台北:經濟新潮社出版。
6.丁虹(民76),企業文化與組織承諾之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
7.尹衍樑(民77),組織變革策略對組織承諾之影響研究--以潤泰工業股份有限公司電腦化為例,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
8.邱恬琳(民90),響應國際志工年,員工做公益,企業作後盾,中國時報,9月2日。
9.林宜欣(民90),台灣企業公益行為之研究,南華大學非營利事業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
10.姜定宇、鄭伯壎(民92),組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻,應用心理研究,第19期,頁175-209。
11.孫震(民93),理當如此-企業永續經營之道,台北市:天下遠見出版。
12.張嘉娟(民93),員工內部行銷知覺、企業文化差異知覺與組織承諾之關連性研究,私立中原大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
13.陳嫣如(民82),從企業公益贊助探討社會福利機構可行的勸募策略,私立東吳大學社會工作研究所未出版碩士論文。
14.游舒惠(民90),企業參與公益活動與公益行銷之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
15.黃正忠主編(民90),企業社會責任-從理念到行動,中華民國企業永續發展委員會。
16.楊炳韋(民84),企業贊助公益活動行為之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
17.葉淑娟(民77),企業社會責任之研究--聯合分析之應用,國立台灣大學/商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
18.劉念寧(民79),大型企業贊助公益活動之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
19.鄭惠文(民81),企業贊助公益活動與企業形象之研究,國立中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
20.經濟日報(民88),天地通 關懷弱勢,1999-09-04/經濟日報/12版/企業社交。
21.企業的社會責任與倫理(陳光榮),http://www.moea.gov.tw/~ecobook/season/sa333.htm
22.經濟部企業社會責任網站,www.csr.idic.gov.tw
二.英文部分:
1.Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization,” Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 63, pp.1-18.
2.Archie, C. B .(1996), Business & Society :Ethics and Stakeholder Management (3rd) Cincinnati, South-Western College Publishing, pp.37-41.
3.Becker, H. S.(1960), “Notes on the Concept of Commitment,” American Journal of Sociology, 66, pp.132-140。
4.Becker, T. E. (1992), “Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making?,” Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 232-244.
5.Becker, T. E., & Billings, R. S. (1993), “Profiles of Commitment: An Empirical Test,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14.177-190.
6.Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996), “Foci and Bases of Employee Commitment: Implications for Job Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(2),464-482.
7.Buchanan, B.(1974), “Building Organization Commitment,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, pp. 533-546.
8.Carroll, A. B.(1996), Business & Society-Ethics and Stakeholder Management(3rd.).South-Western.
9.Etzioni, A. (1961), Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
10.Hay, R. D., Gray, E. R., & Gates, J. E. (1976), Business and society :Cases and Text, Cincinnati :south-western Publishing,PP.10-11.
11.Grahn, J. L., Hannaford, W. J., & Laverty, K. J. (1988). Corporate philanthropy & marketing strategy: A review & directions for research.
12.Gregersen, B. (1993), “Multiple Commitments at Work and Extrarole Behavior during three Dtages of Organization Tenure,” Journal of Business Research, 26, 31-47.
13.Marphy, P. E. (1979), “ An Evoluation : Corporate Social Responsibility”, University of Michigan Business Review.
14.Marx, J. D. (1998), “Corporate Strategic philanthropy Implications for Social Work,” Social Work, 43:34-42.
15.Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990), “A Review and Meta-analysis of the Antecedents, Correlations, and Consequences of organizational Commitment,” Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp.171-194.
16.Mayer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D. (1998), “Differentiating Antecedents of Organizational Commitment:A Test of March and Simon`s Model,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, pp.15-28.
17.Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J.(1997), Commitment in the Workplace:Theory, Research, and Application, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.Modic, S. J. (1988). “Movers and Shakers,” Industry Week, January 18, p47.
19.Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001), “Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsibility? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior”, Journal of Consumer Affairs.
20.Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W.(1982), Employee-Organization Linkage-The Psychology of Commitment Absenteeism and Turnover, New York:Academic Press,pp.20-56.
21.Plinio, A. J. (1986), “Non-Cash Assistance in Corporate Philanthropy,” Fund Raising Management,Vol.16, Iss.11, Jan, pp.92.
22.Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T., Boulian, P. V.(1974), “ Organization Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, pp.603-609.
23.Randall, D. M. (1987), “Commitment and the Organization:The Organization Man Revisited,” Academy of Management Review, 12, No.3, pp.462.
24.Reyes, P. (1990), “Do Career Ladders Enhance Teacher Commitment, Job Satisfaction, or Morale?,” National Association of Secondary School Principals, NASSP Bulletin,74(526),pp.118.
25.Salancik, G. R. (1977), New Directions in Organizational Behavior, Chicago:St. Clair Press.
26.Siegfriend & Mcelroy(1980),“Corporate Philanthropy in the U.S, working paper NO.81-W26, New York: Columbia Center for law and economic studies, December 1981, p.19.
27.Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1977), Motivation and Work Behavior, McGraw-Hill, pp.304.
28.Whyte, W. H. (1956), The Organizational Man, New York:Simon and Schuster.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
91932016
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919320162
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 樓永堅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lou,Yung-Chienen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陽正中zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yang,Cheng-Chungen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陽正中zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yang,Cheng-Chungen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 15:08:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 15:08:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 15:08:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0919320162en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35485-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91932016zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 企業參與公益活動能增加員工對於公司的組織承諾,這也是許多企業參與公益活動的動機及目的之一。但對於員工而言,是否有影響?本研究主要探討台灣一家聯盟企業,藉由問卷調查,了解企業參與公益活動與員工組織承諾影響的相關性。
研究結果顯示,企業參與公益活動與員工組織承諾成正相關,員工對於企業參與公益活動的認同程度愈高,其組織承諾也愈高。同時,員工絕大多數都支持企業應該參與公益活動。
根據本研究的分析結果,企業要勇於參與公益活動,經由參與公益活動能增加員工對於公司的認同,員工在工作上更努力。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) One of the motivations and purposes for enterprises to do Corporate Philanthropy is that they believe Corporate Philanthropy can strength the organizational commitment that employees make to the companies. Is this really true? The main point of this research is to find the causal relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and organizational commitment through use of questionnaire survey.

The result of study shows the positive causal relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Organizational Commitment. The more the enterprise is involved to Corporate Philanthropy, the more employees make organizational commitment to the company. At the same time, employees agree and support the concept of Corporate Philanthropy.

According to this conclusion, enterprises should do more Corporate Philanthropy. Corporate Philanthropy can increase the commitment the employees make to the company.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 3
第三節、研究流程 4
第二章、文獻探討
第一節、企業社會責任的演變與界定 5
第二節、企業參與公益活動 12
第三節、組織承諾 23
第三節、企業參與公益活動與組織承諾的關係 34
第三章、研究方法
第一節、研究架構與研究假設 38
第二節、研究變項之操作性定義與測量工具 39
第三節、研究對象與施測過程 43
第四節、樣本特性描述 45
第三節、資料分析方法 47
第四章、研究結果
第一節、研究變項之敘述性統計分析 48
第二節、假設檢驗 49
第五章、結論與建議
第一節、研究結論 63
第二節、研究建議 65
參考文獻 68
附錄
表目錄
表2-1 CSR國際社會的規範 10
表2-2-1 企業參與公益活動最重要的前十項原因 15
表2-2-2 企業策略性公益計畫目標重要性排序 16
表2-2-3 企業公益動機分類表 17
表2-2-4 企業參與公益活動之動機依照產品銷售之相關性 18
表2-3-1 組織承諾的程度與可能的影響 27
表2-4-1 國內關於企業參與公益活動與本研究的關連性 36
表2-4-2 國外關於企業參與公益活動與本研究的關連性 37
表3-3-1 受訪企業背景資料分析 44
表3-4-1 回收樣本依員工性別劃分之人數百分比 45
表3-4-2 回收樣本依個人變項劃分之次數與百比 47
表4-1-1 組織承諾之敘述性統計分析 49
表4-1-2 整體員工對於企業參與公益活動態度之敘述性統計分析 50
表4-1-3 企業參與公益活動的優先順序看法 50
表4-1-4 樣本加入所屬企業公益社團的分析 51
表4-1-5 樣本捐款參與過所屬企業所舉辦的公益活動分析 51
表4-2-1 樣本加入所屬企業公益社團的分析 47
表4-2-2 樣本捐款參與過所屬企業所舉辦的公益活動分析 48
表4-2-3 員工對於企業參與公益活動的態度與對其組織承諾之相關性檢定 49
表4-2-4 員工是否加入公益社團在「對其組織承諾」上得分差異的t考驗 50
表4-2-5 員工是否捐款參與公益活動在「對其組織承諾」上得分差異的t考驗51
表4-2-6 不同性別在「企業參與公益活動態度」上得分差異的t考驗 52
表4-2-7 不同年齡在「企業參與公益活動態度」之變異數分析 53
表4-2-8 不同學歷在「企業參與公益活動態度」之變異數分析 54
表4-2-9 不同年資在「企業參與公益活動態度」之變異數分析 55
表4-2-10 員工是否加入公益社團在「對於公司的認同」上得分差異的t考驗 56
表4-2-11 員工是否加入公益社團在「對於公司的留職意願」上得分差異的考驗 57

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究架構 4
圖2-1 社會責任圖 9
圖2-2 企業公益行為的目的 14
圖2-3 Steers 的組織承諾前因後果模式理論 31
圖2-4 Mowday,Porter 及Steers 的前因後果理論模式 32
圖3-1 本研究架構 38
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 10921 bytes-
dc.format.extent 15428 bytes-
dc.format.extent 15704 bytes-
dc.format.extent 23051 bytes-
dc.format.extent 21174 bytes-
dc.format.extent 294847 bytes-
dc.format.extent 155210 bytes-
dc.format.extent 119266 bytes-
dc.format.extent 25477 bytes-
dc.format.extent 91502 bytes-
dc.format.extent 149061 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919320162en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業參與公益活動zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織承諾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Corporate social responsibilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Corporate Philanthropyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Organization Commitmenten_US
dc.title (題名) 企業參與公益活動與組織承諾影響之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一.中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Carol L. Cone,Mark A. Feldman & Alison T. Dasilva(2003),公益與品牌之因果關係,哈佛商業評論中文版,第23期,民國92年8月,頁123-131。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Michael E. Porter,Mark R. Kramer(2003),企業慈善的競爭優勢,哈佛商業評論中文版,第16期,民國92年1月,頁71-85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Marc Gobe (2001),高感性品牌行銷(辛巴譯),台北:藍鯨出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Marc Gobe (2004),公民品牌感性行銷(藍美貞、高仁君譯),台北市:天下雜誌出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Noreena Hertz(2003),當企業併購國家-全球資本主義與民主之死(許玉雯譯),台北:經濟新潮社出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.丁虹(民76),企業文化與組織承諾之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.尹衍樑(民77),組織變革策略對組織承諾之影響研究--以潤泰工業股份有限公司電腦化為例,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.邱恬琳(民90),響應國際志工年,員工做公益,企業作後盾,中國時報,9月2日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.林宜欣(民90),台灣企業公益行為之研究,南華大學非營利事業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.姜定宇、鄭伯壎(民92),組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻,應用心理研究,第19期,頁175-209。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.孫震(民93),理當如此-企業永續經營之道,台北市:天下遠見出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.張嘉娟(民93),員工內部行銷知覺、企業文化差異知覺與組織承諾之關連性研究,私立中原大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.陳嫣如(民82),從企業公益贊助探討社會福利機構可行的勸募策略,私立東吳大學社會工作研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.游舒惠(民90),企業參與公益活動與公益行銷之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.黃正忠主編(民90),企業社會責任-從理念到行動,中華民國企業永續發展委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.楊炳韋(民84),企業贊助公益活動行為之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.葉淑娟(民77),企業社會責任之研究--聯合分析之應用,國立台灣大學/商學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.劉念寧(民79),大型企業贊助公益活動之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.鄭惠文(民81),企業贊助公益活動與企業形象之研究,國立中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.經濟日報(民88),天地通 關懷弱勢,1999-09-04/經濟日報/12版/企業社交。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.企業的社會責任與倫理(陳光榮),http://www.moea.gov.tw/~ecobook/season/sa333.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.經濟部企業社會責任網站,www.csr.idic.gov.twzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二.英文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization,” Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 63, pp.1-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Archie, C. B .(1996), Business & Society :Ethics and Stakeholder Management (3rd) Cincinnati, South-Western College Publishing, pp.37-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Becker, H. S.(1960), “Notes on the Concept of Commitment,” American Journal of Sociology, 66, pp.132-140。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Becker, T. E. (1992), “Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making?,” Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 232-244.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Becker, T. E., & Billings, R. S. (1993), “Profiles of Commitment: An Empirical Test,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14.177-190.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996), “Foci and Bases of Employee Commitment: Implications for Job Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(2),464-482.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Buchanan, B.(1974), “Building Organization Commitment,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, pp. 533-546.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Carroll, A. B.(1996), Business & Society-Ethics and Stakeholder Management(3rd.).South-Western.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Etzioni, A. (1961), Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Hay, R. D., Gray, E. R., & Gates, J. E. (1976), Business and society :Cases and Text, Cincinnati :south-western Publishing,PP.10-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Grahn, J. L., Hannaford, W. J., & Laverty, K. J. (1988). Corporate philanthropy & marketing strategy: A review & directions for research.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Gregersen, B. (1993), “Multiple Commitments at Work and Extrarole Behavior during three Dtages of Organization Tenure,” Journal of Business Research, 26, 31-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Marphy, P. E. (1979), “ An Evoluation : Corporate Social Responsibility”, University of Michigan Business Review.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Marx, J. D. (1998), “Corporate Strategic philanthropy Implications for Social Work,” Social Work, 43:34-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990), “A Review and Meta-analysis of the Antecedents, Correlations, and Consequences of organizational Commitment,” Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp.171-194.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Mayer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D. (1998), “Differentiating Antecedents of Organizational Commitment:A Test of March and Simon`s Model,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, pp.15-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J.(1997), Commitment in the Workplace:Theory, Research, and Application, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Modic, S. J. (1988). “Movers and Shakers,” Industry Week, January 18, p47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001), “Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsibility? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior”, Journal of Consumer Affairs.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W.(1982), Employee-Organization Linkage-The Psychology of Commitment Absenteeism and Turnover, New York:Academic Press,pp.20-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Plinio, A. J. (1986), “Non-Cash Assistance in Corporate Philanthropy,” Fund Raising Management,Vol.16, Iss.11, Jan, pp.92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T., Boulian, P. V.(1974), “ Organization Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, pp.603-609.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.Randall, D. M. (1987), “Commitment and the Organization:The Organization Man Revisited,” Academy of Management Review, 12, No.3, pp.462.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.Reyes, P. (1990), “Do Career Ladders Enhance Teacher Commitment, Job Satisfaction, or Morale?,” National Association of Secondary School Principals, NASSP Bulletin,74(526),pp.118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.Salancik, G. R. (1977), New Directions in Organizational Behavior, Chicago:St. Clair Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.Siegfriend & Mcelroy(1980),“Corporate Philanthropy in the U.S, working paper NO.81-W26, New York: Columbia Center for law and economic studies, December 1981, p.19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1977), Motivation and Work Behavior, McGraw-Hill, pp.304.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.Whyte, W. H. (1956), The Organizational Man, New York:Simon and Schuster.zh_TW