Publications-Theses

題名 壽險公司實施優良體之市場展望
作者 王碧波
WANG, PIPEH
貢獻者 蔡政憲
王碧波
WANG, PIPEH
關鍵詞 優良體
優良體保險
核保
危險分類
PREFERRED RISK
PREFERRED RISK POLICY
UNDERWRITING
RISK CLASSIFICATION
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 15:11:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 早期壽險業危險分類的結果,僅區分標準體、次標準體以及拒保體,直到1970年代,美國一家壽險公司為了尋找市場利基,開始針對非吸煙保戶給予優惠費率,從此打開市場,創造競爭優勢;這是壽險公司實施優良體保險的開始。
優良體保險的實施,完全符合公平危險對價的理念,對壽險經營產生正面的意義為:一、因有優惠費率的誘因,可吸引更多的健康者購買保險。二、鼓勵壽險公司更專精於死亡率資料的收集分析及死亡原因的探索,藉以促進危險選擇技術的進步。三、壽險公司擴大承保範圍以增加業務量。
國內傳統壽險保單發展已到了成熟階段,如果壽險業者尋求創新和升級的機會,發展優良體保險,讓保費真正反映風險,這樣的精緻保單,或可爭取保戶認同,贏得商機。
參佐國外的經驗,本研究觀察優良體保險應為未來核保及商品發展的趨勢,乃透由文獻資料分析及深度訪談方式,據以了解優良體保險實務運作的概況、國內壽險業實施優良體保險可能面臨的問題與解決之道,以及經營優良體保險之決策程序及行動方案,作為國內業者未來導入優良體保險的參考。
關鍵字:優良體、優良體保險、核保、危險分類。
In early times, life insurance business classified risk into standard risk, substandard risk, and declined risk only. In 1970s, one life insurance company of the United States began to sell discounted-premium insurance to non-smoking customers who were classified into standard risk class. This innovation opened the preferred risk market and created its own competitive advantages in the insurance market. The era of preferred risk started then.
The practices of Preferred Risk Class Insurance have three positive effects on the market:
1. More healthy people will be led to purchase the insurance policies due to the preferential insurance premium.
2. Life insurance companies will put more efforts on collecting and analyzing the death rate and cause, which will promote the development of risk selection practice.
3. Life insurance companies will have more chance to sell high-coverage policies and increase the sales volume.
Traditional life insurance policies have gone full-grown nowadays. When life insurance company is willing to innovate and upgrade to develop the preferred risk class insurance policies, this finely insurance policy can attract more customers as long as the premium can reflect the actual risk.
Based on the reports of foreign insurance companies, I believe that preferred risk class will be an innovating risk class of life insurance, and will be the product development in the future. This thesis talks about the disputes, solutions, and decision-making processes of the practice of preferred risk insurance. The content can serve as a reference to the insurance industry in Taiwan.
Key words:
Preferred Risk, Preferred Risk Policy, Underwriting, Risk Classification.
參考文獻 中文:
1.小林 修,2003,「日本壽險商品發展的趨勢」,壽險季刊,第127期。
2.王莉婷,1996,台灣個人壽險核保實務之研究,政治大學保險研究所碩士論文。
3.允晨文化,1992,人壽保險新實務講座。
4.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會,2002,台灣壽險業個人壽險年度經驗死亡率及解約失效率研究報告。
5.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會,2003,人身保險業務員資格測驗統一教材。
6.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會,2005,中華民國九十三年度人壽保險業務統計年報。
7.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會網站,2005,世界各國壽險業保費收入,http://www.lia-roc.org.tw/index03/index03.asp?item=rate2003.htm。
8.安德列斯.壽伯辛克,「如何劃分吸煙者與不吸煙者的界線」,南非科隆人壽再保險公司。
9.呂廣盛,2003,個人壽險核保概論,個人印行。
10.胡龍騰、黃瑋瑩、潘中道,2005,研究方法—步驟化學習指南,學富文化事業有限公司。
11.夏銘賢,1998,「台灣壽險業商品研發的演變及新趨勢」,壽險季刊,第109期。
12.陳明哲,2003,「基因資訊在保險核保應用上的規範與爭議」,壽險季刊,第130期。
13.陸健瑜、楊步青、梁子君,「修正生命表的信度理論方法」,精算通訊,第四卷第三期,http://www.shufe.edu.cn/iipe/magazines/vol4no3.htm。
14.德克.尼德爾,「實施優惠風險金定價的第一步:吸煙/不吸煙者險種」,德國科隆人壽再保險公司。
15.藍昭輝,1988,「對不吸煙者採取差別費率所引發之困擾」,壽險季刊,第67期。
16.簡哲民,2004,「壽險核保醫務常識」,財團法人保險事業發展中心壽險核保研討班,第十五期講義。
17.行政院金融監督管理委員會保險局網站,2005,保險業家數及其分支機構統計表, http://www.ib.gov.tw/public/Data/512221635871.xls。
18.行政院金融監督管理委員會保險局網站,2005,保險商品銷售前程序作業準則,http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Newsdetail.asp?NO=1G0390044。
19.行政院金融監督管理委員會保險局網站,2005,提高國人保險保障新聞稿, http://www.ib.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=669053&ctNode=152&mp=1。
英文:
1.Brown, Barbara Foxenberger and Jane Lightcap , 1998, Life and Health Insurance Underwriting, LOMA.
2.Bergstrom, Richard L. and Deborah B. Schmidt, 2000, “Life Insurance Underwriting Tools: An Overview of The Purpose, Cost, and Benefits of Current Risk Selection Tools”, www.Milliman.com/pubs/LifeInsUnderwritingTools.pdf.
3.Black, Kenneth and Harold d. Skipper, 2000, Life & Health Insurance, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
4.Bardin, Dan,“The Ultimate Challenge-Satisfying the customer, the shareholder and the Regulator”, 2005, 22nd Pacific Insurance conference.
5.Cummins, J. David, Barry D. Smith, R. Neil Vance and Jack L. VanDerhei, 1991, Risk Classification in Life Insurance, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6.Du, Jiong, 2005, “Preferred Risk-Actuarial Considerations”, Transamerica Reinsurance.
7.Empire General Life Assurance Corporation, “Field Underwriting Guide”, http://www.themarketingalliance.com/data/ug40.pdf.
8.Gott, David, 2005, “Risk Control and Pricing”, Swiss Re.
9.Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc, “Preferred Risk Underwriting Prequalification Questionnaire”, http://www.nationallife.ca/2001/Forms/Broker/LifeInsurance/E/1788.pdf.
10.ING., “Underwriting Requirements Guide”, http://www.thepg.com/form_pdfs/ING-UnderwritingGuide.pdf.
11.Kelly, James, 2005, “Preferred Risk Underwritten Products-Brokers and Home Office Considerations”, Transamerica Reinsurance.
12.Mast, Jess L., 1997,“ Cost-Benefit Analysis of Underwriting Requirements”, Lincoln National Reinsurance Cos.
13.Munich Re Group, 1999, “The Concept of Preferred Lives”.
14.Macedo, Wayne, 2005,“Preferred Risk Underwriting in The US”, Transamerica Reinsurance.Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated, 2001, “Preferred Underwriting”,
http://www.rgare.com/media/ReVeal.asp.
15.Holowaty, J. Carl, 2005, “Re-FLECTIONS”, RGA.
16.Schwaiger, Engelbert , 2005, “Preferred Lives-A concept for Taiwan? Underwriting Considerations”, Munich Re Group.
17.Society of Actuaries, 1996, “Preferred Risk Underwriting criteria: Task Force Survey Results”, Marco Island Spring Meeting, Record Volume 22 NO.1,
http://library.soa.org/library/record/1990-99/rsa96v22n163ts.pdf.
18.Society of Actuaries, “Report of the Society of Actuaries Task Force on Preferred Risk”, Transactions of Society of Actuaries, 1988-90 Reports”, http://library.soa.org/library/tsareports/1990-99/TSR9512.pdf.
19.Society of Actuaries, 2005, “Report of the Society of Actuaries Preferred Underwriting Survey Subcommittee”.
20.Werth, Martin, 1995, “Preferred Lives-A More Complete Method of Risk Assessment”, www.actuaries.org.uk/files/ pdf/library/SIAS-1995/preferred.pdf.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
92932810
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929328101
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡政憲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王碧波zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) WANG, PIPEHen_US
dc.creator (作者) 王碧波zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) WANG, PIPEHen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 15:11:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 15:11:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 15:11:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0929328101en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35507-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92932810zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 早期壽險業危險分類的結果,僅區分標準體、次標準體以及拒保體,直到1970年代,美國一家壽險公司為了尋找市場利基,開始針對非吸煙保戶給予優惠費率,從此打開市場,創造競爭優勢;這是壽險公司實施優良體保險的開始。
優良體保險的實施,完全符合公平危險對價的理念,對壽險經營產生正面的意義為:一、因有優惠費率的誘因,可吸引更多的健康者購買保險。二、鼓勵壽險公司更專精於死亡率資料的收集分析及死亡原因的探索,藉以促進危險選擇技術的進步。三、壽險公司擴大承保範圍以增加業務量。
國內傳統壽險保單發展已到了成熟階段,如果壽險業者尋求創新和升級的機會,發展優良體保險,讓保費真正反映風險,這樣的精緻保單,或可爭取保戶認同,贏得商機。
參佐國外的經驗,本研究觀察優良體保險應為未來核保及商品發展的趨勢,乃透由文獻資料分析及深度訪談方式,據以了解優良體保險實務運作的概況、國內壽險業實施優良體保險可能面臨的問題與解決之道,以及經營優良體保險之決策程序及行動方案,作為國內業者未來導入優良體保險的參考。
關鍵字:優良體、優良體保險、核保、危險分類。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In early times, life insurance business classified risk into standard risk, substandard risk, and declined risk only. In 1970s, one life insurance company of the United States began to sell discounted-premium insurance to non-smoking customers who were classified into standard risk class. This innovation opened the preferred risk market and created its own competitive advantages in the insurance market. The era of preferred risk started then.
The practices of Preferred Risk Class Insurance have three positive effects on the market:
1. More healthy people will be led to purchase the insurance policies due to the preferential insurance premium.
2. Life insurance companies will put more efforts on collecting and analyzing the death rate and cause, which will promote the development of risk selection practice.
3. Life insurance companies will have more chance to sell high-coverage policies and increase the sales volume.
Traditional life insurance policies have gone full-grown nowadays. When life insurance company is willing to innovate and upgrade to develop the preferred risk class insurance policies, this finely insurance policy can attract more customers as long as the premium can reflect the actual risk.
Based on the reports of foreign insurance companies, I believe that preferred risk class will be an innovating risk class of life insurance, and will be the product development in the future. This thesis talks about the disputes, solutions, and decision-making processes of the practice of preferred risk insurance. The content can serve as a reference to the insurance industry in Taiwan.
Key words:
Preferred Risk, Preferred Risk Policy, Underwriting, Risk Classification.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究方法與範圍…………………………………………… 2
第三節 研究架構與限制…………………………………………… 4
第二章 優良體保險對壽險經營的價值…………………………… 6
第一節 死亡率、危險選擇與危險分類的意義…………………… 6
第二節 台灣壽險業生命表及壽險商品發展之演進………………16
第三節 優良體的緣起及對壽險經營的意義………………………21
第四節 優良體保險於各國之發展概況……………………………25
第五節 從消費者、業務員及壽險公司的觀點看優良體保險……28
第三章 壽險公司導入優良體保險之決策分析……………………30
第一節 優良體保險設計及定價之考量……………………………30
第二節 優良體危險分類概念於保險商品之運用…………………50
第三節 優良體保險之核保架構……………………………………54
第四節 優良體保險之行銷通路……………………………………68
第四章 我國推動優良體保險可行性評估之實務訪查……………70
第一節 訪談對象及訪談大綱………………………………………70
第二節 訪談側記……………………………………………………72
第三節 訪談結論……………………………………………………78
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………88
第一節 國內實施優良體保險之未來發展…………………………88
第二節 對壽險公司及壽險業導入優良體保險之建議……………89
第三節 後續研究建議………………………………………………94
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 48173 bytes-
dc.format.extent 73519 bytes-
dc.format.extent 72415 bytes-
dc.format.extent 116593 bytes-
dc.format.extent 284478 bytes-
dc.format.extent 418093 bytes-
dc.format.extent 187232 bytes-
dc.format.extent 137319 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80615 bytes-
dc.format.extent 76800 bytes-
dc.format.extent 168747 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929328101en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 優良體zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 優良體保險zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 核保zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 危險分類zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) PREFERRED RISKen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) PREFERRED RISK POLICYen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) UNDERWRITINGen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) RISK CLASSIFICATIONen_US
dc.title (題名) 壽險公司實施優良體之市場展望zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.小林 修,2003,「日本壽險商品發展的趨勢」,壽險季刊,第127期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.王莉婷,1996,台灣個人壽險核保實務之研究,政治大學保險研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.允晨文化,1992,人壽保險新實務講座。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會,2002,台灣壽險業個人壽險年度經驗死亡率及解約失效率研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會,2003,人身保險業務員資格測驗統一教材。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會,2005,中華民國九十三年度人壽保險業務統計年報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.中華民國人壽保險商業同業公會網站,2005,世界各國壽險業保費收入,http://www.lia-roc.org.tw/index03/index03.asp?item=rate2003.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.安德列斯.壽伯辛克,「如何劃分吸煙者與不吸煙者的界線」,南非科隆人壽再保險公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.呂廣盛,2003,個人壽險核保概論,個人印行。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.胡龍騰、黃瑋瑩、潘中道,2005,研究方法—步驟化學習指南,學富文化事業有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.夏銘賢,1998,「台灣壽險業商品研發的演變及新趨勢」,壽險季刊,第109期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.陳明哲,2003,「基因資訊在保險核保應用上的規範與爭議」,壽險季刊,第130期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.陸健瑜、楊步青、梁子君,「修正生命表的信度理論方法」,精算通訊,第四卷第三期,http://www.shufe.edu.cn/iipe/magazines/vol4no3.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.德克.尼德爾,「實施優惠風險金定價的第一步:吸煙/不吸煙者險種」,德國科隆人壽再保險公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.藍昭輝,1988,「對不吸煙者採取差別費率所引發之困擾」,壽險季刊,第67期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.簡哲民,2004,「壽險核保醫務常識」,財團法人保險事業發展中心壽險核保研討班,第十五期講義。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.行政院金融監督管理委員會保險局網站,2005,保險業家數及其分支機構統計表, http://www.ib.gov.tw/public/Data/512221635871.xls。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.行政院金融監督管理委員會保險局網站,2005,保險商品銷售前程序作業準則,http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Newsdetail.asp?NO=1G0390044。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.行政院金融監督管理委員會保險局網站,2005,提高國人保險保障新聞稿, http://www.ib.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=669053&ctNode=152&mp=1。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Brown, Barbara Foxenberger and Jane Lightcap , 1998, Life and Health Insurance Underwriting, LOMA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Bergstrom, Richard L. and Deborah B. Schmidt, 2000, “Life Insurance Underwriting Tools: An Overview of The Purpose, Cost, and Benefits of Current Risk Selection Tools”, www.Milliman.com/pubs/LifeInsUnderwritingTools.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Black, Kenneth and Harold d. Skipper, 2000, Life & Health Insurance, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Bardin, Dan,“The Ultimate Challenge-Satisfying the customer, the shareholder and the Regulator”, 2005, 22nd Pacific Insurance conference.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Cummins, J. David, Barry D. Smith, R. Neil Vance and Jack L. VanDerhei, 1991, Risk Classification in Life Insurance, Kluwer Academic Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Du, Jiong, 2005, “Preferred Risk-Actuarial Considerations”, Transamerica Reinsurance.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Empire General Life Assurance Corporation, “Field Underwriting Guide”, http://www.themarketingalliance.com/data/ug40.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Gott, David, 2005, “Risk Control and Pricing”, Swiss Re.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc, “Preferred Risk Underwriting Prequalification Questionnaire”, http://www.nationallife.ca/2001/Forms/Broker/LifeInsurance/E/1788.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.ING., “Underwriting Requirements Guide”, http://www.thepg.com/form_pdfs/ING-UnderwritingGuide.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Kelly, James, 2005, “Preferred Risk Underwritten Products-Brokers and Home Office Considerations”, Transamerica Reinsurance.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Mast, Jess L., 1997,“ Cost-Benefit Analysis of Underwriting Requirements”, Lincoln National Reinsurance Cos.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Munich Re Group, 1999, “The Concept of Preferred Lives”.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Macedo, Wayne, 2005,“Preferred Risk Underwriting in The US”, Transamerica Reinsurance.Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated, 2001, “Preferred Underwriting”,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.rgare.com/media/ReVeal.asp.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Holowaty, J. Carl, 2005, “Re-FLECTIONS”, RGA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Schwaiger, Engelbert , 2005, “Preferred Lives-A concept for Taiwan? Underwriting Considerations”, Munich Re Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Society of Actuaries, 1996, “Preferred Risk Underwriting criteria: Task Force Survey Results”, Marco Island Spring Meeting, Record Volume 22 NO.1,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://library.soa.org/library/record/1990-99/rsa96v22n163ts.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Society of Actuaries, “Report of the Society of Actuaries Task Force on Preferred Risk”, Transactions of Society of Actuaries, 1988-90 Reports”, http://library.soa.org/library/tsareports/1990-99/TSR9512.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Society of Actuaries, 2005, “Report of the Society of Actuaries Preferred Underwriting Survey Subcommittee”.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Werth, Martin, 1995, “Preferred Lives-A More Complete Method of Risk Assessment”, www.actuaries.org.uk/files/ pdf/library/SIAS-1995/preferred.pdf.zh_TW