| dc.contributor.advisor | 顏良恭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yen,Liang-kung | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 胡文惠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Hu,Wen-hui | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 胡文惠 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hu,Wen-hui | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 15:37:43 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 15:37:43 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 15:37:43 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0092256013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35662 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 公共行政研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92256013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 團體盲思是指某一個團體因為具有高度的凝聚力，非常強調團結一致的重要性，因此在討論問題時，壓抑了個人獨立思考及判斷的能力，迫使個人放棄批判及提出不同意見的機會，最後使團體產生錯誤或不當的決策後果。由於該現象可能造成相當大的負面影響，又對照團體盲思之成因有若干因素與我國行政文化相符，究竟我國行政機關是否有團體盲思之現象？本文從Janis提出之團體盲思理論著手，依序探討不同途徑、不同學者對該理論的相關研究─將焦點置於變項的選擇以及變項間的影響關係，進而對照我國行政組織文化的特色，提出本研究之假設。實證部分，本文採調查分析方法，針對我國行政組織中的公務人員進行問卷調查，根據所得資料，運用因素分析、積差相關、典型相關以及變異數分析等統計方法加以分析。研究結果顯示，我國行政機關具有兩種團體盲思之類型，團體盲思型一主要是由指導式領導風格和組織認同，導致資訊處理錯誤之症狀；型二則是因團體凝聚力和指導式領導風格，所產生高估團體道德及權威的情形。兩種類型在團體盲思現象的理論上，皆有可以和國外研究相對照比較之處；在實務上，則希望提供行政機關作為改善決策行為之參考，以避免該現象所帶來的負面效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 研究動機與目的 1第二章 團體盲思理論相關文獻檢閱 2第一節 Janis 的團體盲思理論 3壹、團體盲思前提 4貳、團體盲思症狀 9第二節 學者的後續研究 13壹、實驗室實驗設計 14貳、個案分析 17參、小結 23第三章 研究假設與研究架構 25第一節 研究假設 25第二節 研究架構 29第三節 樣本分配與信度效度分析 31第四章 我國行政機關團體盲思現象之分析 35第一節 團體盲思症狀與其前提條件 35第二節 我國團體盲思類型 39第五章 結論 45第一節 研究發現 45第二節 後續研究建議 46參考書目 47附錄 1 問卷 50附錄 2 樣本次數分配 51附錄 3 因素分析 53附錄 4 基本資料在症狀表現上的檢定 56附錄 5 團體盲思前提條件、症狀的描述性統計 60圖次圖 1 Janis的團體盲思理論架構 13圖 2 Schafer & Crichlow 的團體盲思理論架構 21圖 3 Schafer & Crichlow 的另一種團體盲思關係假設 22圖 4 研究架構 30圖 5 因素分析後的研究架構 34圖 6 典型相關型一 40圖 7 指導式領導風格、組織認同對資訊處理錯誤的影響之變異數 分析圖 41圖 8 典型相關型二 42圖 9 團體凝聚力、指導式領導風格對高估團體道德與權威的影響 之變異數分析圖 43表次表 1 研究架構中的概念定義 31表 2 積差相關 38表 3 指導式領導風格、組織認同對資訊處理錯誤的影響之變異數 分析表 41表 4 團體凝聚力、指導式領導風格對高估團體道德與權威的影響 之變異數分表 43 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 8521 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 8734 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 10480 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 26122 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 24286 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 279271 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 235857 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 165733 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 18511 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 43352 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 333478 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092256013 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 團體盲思 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 行政文化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | groupthink | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | administrative culture | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 行政組織中團體盲思現象的初探 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳定 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 公共政策辭典，台北：五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳定，張潤書，陳德禹，賴維堯編著 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000 行政學〈二〉〈修訂四版〉，臺北：空大。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳俊霖 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1998 從組織文化途徑建構企業型政府之研究：以我國政府再造為例，東海大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林水波 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2004 「從團體盲思解析花蓮縣長補選」，立法院院聞，第32期，頁50-60。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林清山 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1988 多變項分析統計法，頁325-346，臺北：東華。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 心理與教育統計學，頁338-340，臺北：東華。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 金耀基譯〈Fred w. Riggs原著〉 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 行政生態學，臺北：臺灣商務。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 姜占魁 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1982 行政學，臺北：五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 姜占魁 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1991 組織行為與行政管理，臺北：自版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬心韻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1994 「行政生態的理論與運用─試由雷格斯的生態模型淺析台灣地區的行政文化」，警政學報，第25期，頁165-180。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 徐瑋伶，鄭伯壎 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 「組織認同：理論與本質之初步探索分析」，中山管理評論，第十卷第一期，頁48-49。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭秋永 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 「邏輯實證論與民主理論：驗證問題的探討」，收錄餘張福建、蘇文流主編，民主理論：古典與現代，頁381，臺北：中研院社科所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許國進 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 從群體迷思現象的觀點來探討國內廠商投資大陸之決策過程—以電器電纜業為例，元智大學工業工程與管理學系碩士學位論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃俊英 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1988 多變量分析，頁189-207，臺北：中華經濟企業研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃立雙 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003 領導者型態與時間壓力對群體支援系統輔助成效之影響，國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃光志 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 團隊迷思模型問卷之發展，大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士學位論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃光國 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1989 「因素分析」，收錄於楊國樞等主編，社會及行為科學研究法〈五版〉，頁833-858，臺北：東華。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張以諾 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1986 「行政組織中團體盲思現象之研究」，政大公共行政系刊，第21期，頁23-35。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 潘明宏、陳志瑋譯〈Nachmias C. & Nachmias D.原著〉 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 社會科學研究方法，臺北：韋伯文化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aldag, R. J. and Fuller, S. R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993 “Beyond fiasco: A Reappraisal of the Groupthink Phenomenon and A New Model of Group Decision Processes,” Psychological Bulletin, 113:533-552. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Callaway, M. R. and J. K. Esser | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1984 “Groupthink: Effects of Cohesiveness and Problem-Solving Procedures on Group Decision Making,” Social Behavior and Personality, 12:157-164. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Callaway, M. R., R. G. Marriott, and J. K. Esser | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1985 “Effects of Dominance on Group Decisions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49:949-952. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Esser, J. K. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 “Groupthink from Pearl Harbor to the Challenger: Failure of Decision-Making Groups,” Distinguished Faculty Lecture, Beaumont, TX: Lamar University. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1998 “Alive and Well After 25 Years A Review of Groupthink Research,” Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73:128-130. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fodor, E. M., and T. Smith | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1982 “The Power Motive as An Influence on Group Decision Making,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42:178-185. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | George, A. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1980 Presidential Decisionmaking in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice. Boulder: Westview. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hart P. ’t. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure. Amsterdam: Swetz and Zeitlinger. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Herek, G. M., I. L. Janis, and P. Huth | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1987 “Decision Making during International Crisis: Is Quality of Process related to Outcome? “Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31:203-226. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huseman, R. C. and Driver, R. W. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1979 “Groupthink: Implications for Small Group Decision Making in Business,” Readings in Organizational Behavior, pp.100-110, Boston: Allyn and Bacon. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | James D. F. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1991 “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43:169-195. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Janis I. L. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1972 Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1982 Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1989 Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management. New York: Free Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Janis I. L., and L. Mann | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1977 Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York: Free Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leanna, C. R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1985 “A Partial Test of Janis’s Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decisionmaking,” Journal of Management , 11:5-17. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nachmias, D. and Nachmias, C. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 Research Methods in the Social Science. London: Arnold. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Neck, C. P. and Moorhead, G. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 “Jury Deliberations in The Trail of U.S. v. John DeLorean: A Case Analysis of Groupthink Avoidance and An Enhanced Framework,” Human Relations, 45:1077-1091. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Raven, B. H. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1974 “The Nixon Group,” Journal of Social Issues, 30:297-320. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosenberg, M | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1968 The Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schafer, M., and S. Crichlow | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1996 “Antecedents of Groupthink: A Quantitative Study,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40:415-435. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 “The Process-Outcome Connection in Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Quantitative Study Building on Groupthink,” International Studies Quarterly, 46:45-68. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sims, R. R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 “Linking Groupthink to Unethical Behavior in Organizations,” Journal of Business Ethics, 11:651-662. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tetlock, P. E. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1979 “Identifying Victims of Groupthink from Public Statements of Decision Makers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37:1314-1324. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tetlock,P. E., Peterson, R. S., McGuire, C., Chang, S., and Feld, P. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 “Assessing Political Group Dynamics: A Test of The Groupthink Model,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63:403-425. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | White, R. and Lippit, R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1942 Child behavior and development. New York: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
