學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 影響民眾使用網路公共論壇的關鍵因素
作者 陳云玲
Chen, Yun-Ling
貢獻者 蕭乃沂
陳云玲
Chen, Yun-Ling
關鍵詞 網路公共論壇
持續使用意願
計畫行為理論
自覺風險性
Online Public Forums
continuance usage intention
Theory of Planned Behavior
perceived risk
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 15:49:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 電子化民主強調公民參與的重要性,政府亦積極投入推動的工作,值得我們注意的是,就政府所設置的電子化民主機制而言,民眾在使用上的觀感和意願可能是重要的,本研究想要了解對於已使用過的民眾而言,哪些因素會影響他們持續使用該機制的意願?本研究以計畫行為理論為研究架構之基礎,並依據文獻整合假設自覺風險性對態度、持續使用意願有顯著影響。

本研究主要的目的有二:一是透過文獻探討以了解電子化民主起源與實行目標,並藉此了解電子化民主對民眾而言,扮演何種角色與提供哪些功能和效益。二是透過實證研究來對計畫行為理論進行模式檢測,檢視該理論是否適用於解釋持續使用意願的影響因素,並藉此了解影響民眾持續使用意願的因素。

實證研究的結果顯示影響民眾持續使用網路公共論壇意願的因素為態度和認知行為控制,僅主觀規範較無顯著影響。由此可知,計畫行為理論並不能完全解釋「持續使用意願」的影響因素,但仍有部分論點可以適用於解釋「持續使用意願」的影響因素。再者,對民眾持續使用網路公共論壇之意願的影響力最大為民眾對使用論壇的態度。此外,本研究發現在網路公共論壇使用上,由於個人資料外洩或侵犯隱私的機率低,故對已使用過的民眾而言,風險問題可能並無影響,故自覺風險性對「網路公共論壇持續使用意願」的影響並不顯著。
Issues concerning e-Democracy emphasize the importance of citizen participation. Governments in the worldwide invest much in pushing e-Democracy. Specifically, citizens’ attitude and intention are crucial for e-Democracy institutions of Governments. The central theme in this research is: which factors will affect their continuance usage intention for citizens who have been using online public forums? The research model based on Theory of Planned Behavior supposes that attitude and continuance usage intention will be affect by perceived risk.

There are two purposes in this research. Firstly, it attempts to realize the origin and the goal of e-Democracy according to some related literatures. Secondly, it also conducts a model-testing to examine the applicability of the theory through the investigation.

Results of the investigation indicated that citizens’ continuing usage intention of online public forums is affected by the attitude and perceived behavior control. Further, subjective norm didn’t have any obvious influence. These largely show that Theory of Planned Behavior based model is partly suitable to explain the factors of the citizens’usage intention. Overall, the most crucial factor affecting citizens’usage intention is their attitude toward using online public forums. In addition, perceived risk had no obvious influence on the usage intention as expected. This may be due to lower probabilities that individual data or privacy being damaged in online public forums.
參考文獻 一、 中文部分
尤婷靜,2003。〈影響網路報稅接受意向之關鍵因素:三種理論模式之比較〉,中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
行政院研究發展考核委員會,2005。《九十四年數位落差調查報告初稿》。
李敏正,2003。〈延伸計劃行為理論以預測WWW持續使用之研究〉,高雄第一科技大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
李政忠,2004。〈網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議〉,《資訊社會研究》,第6期,頁1-24。
周文賢,2002。《多變量統計分析》,台北:智勝。
邱皓政,2005。《結構方程模式—LISREL的理論、技術與應用》,台北:雙葉書廊。
徐千偉,2000。〈網際網路與公民參與:台北市政府網路個案分析〉,政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
張明貴 譯,1993。《自由民主的經驗與時代》,C.B. Macpherson 原著,台北:桂冠。
項 靖,1997。〈線上政府:初探全球資訊網與台灣地區地方政府行政〉,收錄於行政發展與地方政府競爭力之提昇研討會論文集。
項 靖,1999。〈地方政府網路公共論壇與民主行政之實踐〉,《東海社會科學學報》,第18期,頁149-178。
項靖、翁芳怡,2000。〈我國政府網路民意論壇版面使用者滿意度之實證研究〉,《公共行政學報》,第4期,頁259-285。
黃東益、黃佳珊,2003。〈地方政府『數位民主』機制—以台灣省二十一縣市政府網站為例〉,《法政學報》,第16期,頁179-202。
葉俊榮,2004。〈電子化民主對民主政治發展之意涵〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷第4期,頁12-24。
蕭乃沂、黃建國,2005。〈電子民主的行政可行性:公務人員的行為觀點〉,發表於第五屆「政治與資訊科技」研討會,佛光人文社會學院主辦(4/15),台北。
羅晉,2004。〈網際審議式民主之實現與現實:以我國地方政府網際公共論壇為例〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第39期,頁105-142。
溫素真,2004。〈消費者使用簡訊折價券之行為意圖〉,高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭仁富,2004。〈未來公民投票可考慮開放電子連署〉,
(http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=3062)visited 2005/7/10。
鄭傑升,2001。〈從民眾使用的觀點建構電子化政府推動成效評估量表〉,元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
劉宗熹,2005。〈E化民主〉,
(http://www.taskco.com.tw/kt/k12.htm)visited 2005/7/11。
蕃薯藤,2004。〈台灣網路使用調查〉,
(http://survey.yam.com/survey2004/chart/index.php)
visited 2005/9/07。
二、 英文部分
Ajzen, I. (1985). “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior,” in Kuhl, J. & J. Beckman (eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior , pp.11-39. Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1989). “Attitude Structure and Behavior,” in Pratkans, A. R., S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald(eds.), Attitude Stucture and Function Hillsdale, pp.252. N.J: Erlbaumand Associates.
Ajzen, I. (1991). “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50: 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2005). “Laws of human behavior: Symmetry, compatibility, and attitude-behavior correspondence,” in Beauducel, A., B. Biehl, M. Bosniak, W. Conrad, G. Sch□nberger & D. Wagener (eds.), Multivariate research strategies, pp. 3-19. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.
Ajzen, I. & M. Fishbein (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84(2): 191-215.
Barnes, S. J. & R. Vidgen (2004). “Interactive E-Government: Evaluating the Web Site of the UK Inland Revenue,” Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(1): 42-63.
(www.webqual.co.uk/papers/inlandrevenue.pdf)visited 2005/6/02.
Bhattancherjee, A. (2000). “Acceptance of E-Commerce Services: The Case of Electronic Brokerages,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(4): 411-420.
Bhattancherjee, A. (2001). “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model,” MIS Quaterly, 25(3): 351-370.
Brants, K., M. Huizenga & R. van Meerten (1996). “ The New Canals of Amsterdam: An Exercise in Local Electronic Democracy,” Media, Culture & Society, 18: 233-247.
Casaregola, V. & R. A. Cropf (1998). “Virtual Town Halls: Using Computer Networks to Improve Public Discourse and Facilitate Service Delivery,”
(http://www.iog.ca/policity/CP/Public%20Library/library_reference_virtual_town_halls.html)visited 2005/5/20.
Baum, C. & A. D. Maio (2000). “Gartner`s Four Phases of E-Government Model,”
(http://aln.hha.dk/IFI/Hdi/2001/ITstrat/Download/Gartner_eGovernment.pdf)visited 2005/7/6.
Conhaim, W. W. (2000). “E-democracy gains ground,” Link – up, 17: 5-8.
Couper, M. P. (2000). “A Riew of Issues and Approaches,” Public Opinion
Quarterly, 64(4): 464-494.
Davis, F.D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User
Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340.
Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi & P. R. Warshaw (1989). “User acceptance of
computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,”
Management Science, 35(8): 982-1003.
Docter, S. & W. H. Dutton (1998). “The first amendment online: Santa
Monica`s public electronic network,” in Tsgarousianou, R., D. Tambini
and C. Bryan (eds.), Cyberdemocracy: Technology , cities and civic networks, pp.125-151. London: Routledge.
Fishbein, M. & I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fisher, B., M. Margolis and D. Resnick (1994). “A New Way of Talking Politics: Democracy on the Internet,”
(http://www.eff.org/pub/Activism/E-voting/net_civics.survey)
visited 2005/5/20.
Friis, C. S. (1997). “A Critical Evaluation of the Danish National ICT-Strategy,” (http://www.dcu.ie/communications/iegis/Friis.htm)visited 2005/5/20.
Gr□nlund, □ke (2002). “E-democracy and e-government-state of the art,”
(http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/papers/062-090e.pdf)visited 2005/5/18.
Gr□nlund, □ke (2003). “e-Democracy: in Search of Tools and Methods for Effective Participation,” Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 12: 93-100.
Hacker, K. L. (1996). “Missing Links in the Evolution of Electronic Democratization,” Media, Culture & Society, 18(2): 213-232.
Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham & W. C. Black (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall.
Hunt, H. K. (1977). “CS/D -Overview and Future Research Direction,” in Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction,H. Keith Hunt, ed. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes & G. B. Davis (1995). “Testing the determinants of Microcomputer usage via a structural equation model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4): 87-114.
Johnson, S. M. (1998). “The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information Through the Internet,” Administrative Law Review, 50(2): 277-337.
Jordan, B. J. (1998). “Collective Learning Online: A Report on the Information Society and Governance Project,”
(http://www.snafu.de/~mjm/brooks4.html)visited 2005/5/20.
Kersten, G. E. (2003). “e-Democracy and Participatory Decision Processes: Lessons from e-Nagotiation Experiments,” Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 12: 127-143.
Latour, S. A.&Peat, N. C. (1979). “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Consumer Satisfaction Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, 6 ed.William L. Wikie. Ann Arbor MI: Association for Consumer Research, pp.431-437.
OECD (2001). Citizens as partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making.
(www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/4201141E.PDF)
visited 2005/5/22.
OECD (2003a). The E-government Imperative: Main Findings. Paris.
(http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/60/2502539.pdf)
visited 2005/7/6.
OECD (2003b). Promise and Problem of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement.
(www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/4204011E.PDF)
visited 2005/5/22.
Oliver, R. L. (1980). “A Cognitive Model for the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17: 460-469.
Phang, C. W., J. Sutanto, Y. Li, A. Kankanhalli (2005). “Senior Citizens’ Adoption of E-Government: In Quest of the Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness,”
(http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2005/2268/05/22680130a.pdf)visited 2005/5/20.
Planmo, M. (2005). “From Patron-Client to Client-Server: E-democracy in Tanzania?”
(www.cdt.org/egov/handbook/tanzania.pdf)visited 2005/4/20.
Rose, G., M. Warkentin, D. Gefen & P. Pavlou (1999). “The Role and System Characteristics of Internet-Voting in the Republic of South Africa: Looking Inside a Multi-cultural, Nascent Democracy,”(www.uic.edu/~evaristo/p3.pdf)visited 2005/5/12.
Ruge, M. (2005). “IT and E-Democracy,”
(www.bbc.qld.edu.au/resource/files/ITN330Report.pdf)
visited 2005/5/12.
Schwartz, E. I. (1993). “Direct Democracy: Are You Ready for the Democracy Channel?”
(http://www.eff.org/pub/Activism/E-voting/democracy_online.article)visited 2005/5/19.
Spreng, R. A., B. M. Scott & R. W. Olshavsky (1996). “A reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing, 60: 15-32.
Szajna, B. (1996). “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model,” Management Science, 42(1): 85-92.
Taylor, S. & P.A. Todd (1995a). “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research, 6(2): 144-176.
Taylor, S. & P.A. Todd (1995b). “Assesing IT Usage:The Role of Prior Experience,” MIS Quaterly, 19(4):561-571.
Torres, L., V. Pina & B. Acerete (2005). “E-Governance Developments in EU Cities. Reshaping Government Relation to Citizen,”
(http://www.uc3m.es/uc3m/dpto/EMP/seminar/torres.pdf)
visited 2005/7/5.
Venkatesh, V. & Davis F. D. (1996). “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, 27(3): 451-481.
Watson R. T. & B. Mundy (1999). “A strategic perspective of electronic democracy,” Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 44(1): 27-30.
Weare, C., J. A. Musso and M. L. Hale (1999). “Electronic Democracy and the Diffusion of Municipal Web Pages in California,” Administration & Society, 31(1): 3-27.
White, C. S. (1997). “Citizen Participation and the Internet: Prospects for Civic Deliberation in the Information Age,” Social Studies, 88(1): 23-28.
Zurita, Laura (2005).“Who is out there? Experiences from a mixed mode participatory experience,”
(http://www.trafikdage.dk/writeable/ddnpaper/Paper30.doc)
visited 2005/4/21.
Zuurmond, A. (1994). “From Bureaucracy to Infocracy: A Tale of Two Cities,” Informatization and the Public Sector, 3(3): 189-204.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
92256010
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922560101
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蕭乃沂zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳云玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Yun-Lingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳云玲zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Yun-Lingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 15:49:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 15:49:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 15:49:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0922560101en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35717-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92256010zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 電子化民主強調公民參與的重要性,政府亦積極投入推動的工作,值得我們注意的是,就政府所設置的電子化民主機制而言,民眾在使用上的觀感和意願可能是重要的,本研究想要了解對於已使用過的民眾而言,哪些因素會影響他們持續使用該機制的意願?本研究以計畫行為理論為研究架構之基礎,並依據文獻整合假設自覺風險性對態度、持續使用意願有顯著影響。

本研究主要的目的有二:一是透過文獻探討以了解電子化民主起源與實行目標,並藉此了解電子化民主對民眾而言,扮演何種角色與提供哪些功能和效益。二是透過實證研究來對計畫行為理論進行模式檢測,檢視該理論是否適用於解釋持續使用意願的影響因素,並藉此了解影響民眾持續使用意願的因素。

實證研究的結果顯示影響民眾持續使用網路公共論壇意願的因素為態度和認知行為控制,僅主觀規範較無顯著影響。由此可知,計畫行為理論並不能完全解釋「持續使用意願」的影響因素,但仍有部分論點可以適用於解釋「持續使用意願」的影響因素。再者,對民眾持續使用網路公共論壇之意願的影響力最大為民眾對使用論壇的態度。此外,本研究發現在網路公共論壇使用上,由於個人資料外洩或侵犯隱私的機率低,故對已使用過的民眾而言,風險問題可能並無影響,故自覺風險性對「網路公共論壇持續使用意願」的影響並不顯著。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Issues concerning e-Democracy emphasize the importance of citizen participation. Governments in the worldwide invest much in pushing e-Democracy. Specifically, citizens’ attitude and intention are crucial for e-Democracy institutions of Governments. The central theme in this research is: which factors will affect their continuance usage intention for citizens who have been using online public forums? The research model based on Theory of Planned Behavior supposes that attitude and continuance usage intention will be affect by perceived risk.

There are two purposes in this research. Firstly, it attempts to realize the origin and the goal of e-Democracy according to some related literatures. Secondly, it also conducts a model-testing to examine the applicability of the theory through the investigation.

Results of the investigation indicated that citizens’ continuing usage intention of online public forums is affected by the attitude and perceived behavior control. Further, subjective norm didn’t have any obvious influence. These largely show that Theory of Planned Behavior based model is partly suitable to explain the factors of the citizens’usage intention. Overall, the most crucial factor affecting citizens’usage intention is their attitude toward using online public forums. In addition, perceived risk had no obvious influence on the usage intention as expected. This may be due to lower probabilities that individual data or privacy being damaged in online public forums.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄 I
表目次 III
圖目次 IV
中文摘要 V
Abstract VI


第一章 緒論 1
第一節 電子化民主 1
第二節 研究動機 4
第三節 研究目的與研究問題 5
第四節 研究範圍 6
第五節 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 電子化民主 8
第二節 網路公共論壇 15
第三節 理論基礎:計畫行為理論 19
第四節 以民眾角度的相關評估研究 29
第三章 研究方法與設計 36
第一節 研究架構與假說 36
第二節 變數之操作性定義 43
第三節 研究對象與調查程序 49
第四節 資料分析方法 59
第四章 資料分析 60
第一節 問卷回收與樣本資料分析 60
第二節 問卷信度與效度檢測 64
第三節 問卷題項的敘述統計分析 68
第四節 外在變數對各研究構面的影響 76
第五節 研究假說檢測 83
第六節 模型修正之測試 92
第五章 結論 97
第一節 研究結果彙整 97
第二節 研究限制 98
第三節 實務建議 99
第四節 後續研究方向與建議 100
參考文獻 103
附錄一、正式問卷 110


表目次
表2-1:可供本研究架構參考之相關研究 35
表3-1:本研究假設整理 42
表3-2:本研究問卷衡量題項與參考來源 46
表3-3:本研究所調查之網路公共論壇 52
表3-4:前測對象資料統計表 54
表3-5:前測題項的信、效度分析 57
表3-6:前測各構面之間的相關矩陣 58
表4-1:受測樣本之人口統計表 61
表4-2:本研究與其他研究之比較 63
表4-3:各因素之解釋變異量與總累積解釋變異量 65
表4-4:正式問卷的信、效度分析 66
表4-5:正式施測各構面之間的相關矩陣 67
表4-6:問卷題項的敘述統計表 69
表4-7:性別對各研究構面的影響 76
表4-8:年齡對各研究構面的影響 77
表4-9:教育程度對各研究構面的影響 78
表4-10:每週上網總時數對各研究構面的影響 79
表4-11:一年內瀏覽次數對各研究構面的影響 80
表4-12:一年內發言次數對各研究構面的影響 81
表4-13:一年內回覆他人發言次數對各研究構面的影響 82
表4-14:契合度指標分析 85
表4-15:本研究假說檢定結果 88
表4-16:PA-OV路徑分析各項效果與t-value 89


圖目次
圖1-1:本研究流程 7
圖2-1:電子化民主與民主的關係 10
圖2-2:電子資訊公開形式中政府與民眾的關係 12
圖2-3:電子公民諮詢形式中政府與民眾的關係 12
圖2-4:電子決策制訂形式中政府與民眾的關係 13
圖2-5:理性行為理論 20
圖2-6:科技接受模型 21
圖2-7:計畫行為理論 22
圖2-8:計畫行為理論模式 25
圖2-9:解構型式的計畫行為理論 27
圖2-10:本節文獻探討重點 30
圖3-1:本研究架構 39
圖4-1:本研究架構之SEM檢定圖 87
圖4-2:模型修改測試1:SEM檢定圖 93
圖4-3:模型修改測試2:SEM檢定圖 95
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 43357 bytes-
dc.format.extent 90479 bytes-
dc.format.extent 68620 bytes-
dc.format.extent 70147 bytes-
dc.format.extent 151429 bytes-
dc.format.extent 257048 bytes-
dc.format.extent 203861 bytes-
dc.format.extent 247695 bytes-
dc.format.extent 138155 bytes-
dc.format.extent 115326 bytes-
dc.format.extent 106308 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922560101en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網路公共論壇zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 持續使用意願zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 計畫行為理論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自覺風險性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Online Public Forumsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) continuance usage intentionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Theory of Planned Behavioren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) perceived risken_US
dc.title (題名) 影響民眾使用網路公共論壇的關鍵因素zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 尤婷靜,2003。〈影響網路報稅接受意向之關鍵因素:三種理論模式之比較〉,中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院研究發展考核委員會,2005。《九十四年數位落差調查報告初稿》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李敏正,2003。〈延伸計劃行為理論以預測WWW持續使用之研究〉,高雄第一科技大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李政忠,2004。〈網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議〉,《資訊社會研究》,第6期,頁1-24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周文賢,2002。《多變量統計分析》,台北:智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱皓政,2005。《結構方程模式—LISREL的理論、技術與應用》,台北:雙葉書廊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐千偉,2000。〈網際網路與公民參與:台北市政府網路個案分析〉,政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張明貴 譯,1993。《自由民主的經驗與時代》,C.B. Macpherson 原著,台北:桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 項 靖,1997。〈線上政府:初探全球資訊網與台灣地區地方政府行政〉,收錄於行政發展與地方政府競爭力之提昇研討會論文集。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 項 靖,1999。〈地方政府網路公共論壇與民主行政之實踐〉,《東海社會科學學報》,第18期,頁149-178。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 項靖、翁芳怡,2000。〈我國政府網路民意論壇版面使用者滿意度之實證研究〉,《公共行政學報》,第4期,頁259-285。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃東益、黃佳珊,2003。〈地方政府『數位民主』機制—以台灣省二十一縣市政府網站為例〉,《法政學報》,第16期,頁179-202。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉俊榮,2004。〈電子化民主對民主政治發展之意涵〉,《研考雙月刊》,第28卷第4期,頁12-24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭乃沂、黃建國,2005。〈電子民主的行政可行性:公務人員的行為觀點〉,發表於第五屆「政治與資訊科技」研討會,佛光人文社會學院主辦(4/15),台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅晉,2004。〈網際審議式民主之實現與現實:以我國地方政府網際公共論壇為例〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第39期,頁105-142。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溫素真,2004。〈消費者使用簡訊折價券之行為意圖〉,高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭仁富,2004。〈未來公民投票可考慮開放電子連署〉,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=3062)visited 2005/7/10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭傑升,2001。〈從民眾使用的觀點建構電子化政府推動成效評估量表〉,元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉宗熹,2005。〈E化民主〉,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.taskco.com.tw/kt/k12.htm)visited 2005/7/11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕃薯藤,2004。〈台灣網路使用調查〉,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://survey.yam.com/survey2004/chart/index.php)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/9/07。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ajzen, I. (1985). “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior,” in Kuhl, J. & J. Beckman (eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior , pp.11-39. Heidelberg: Springer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ajzen, I. (1989). “Attitude Structure and Behavior,” in Pratkans, A. R., S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald(eds.), Attitude Stucture and Function Hillsdale, pp.252. N.J: Erlbaumand Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ajzen, I. (1991). “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50: 179-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ajzen, I. (2005). “Laws of human behavior: Symmetry, compatibility, and attitude-behavior correspondence,” in Beauducel, A., B. Biehl, M. Bosniak, W. Conrad, G. Sch□nberger & D. Wagener (eds.), Multivariate research strategies, pp. 3-19. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ajzen, I. & M. Fishbein (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84(2): 191-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barnes, S. J. & R. Vidgen (2004). “Interactive E-Government: Evaluating the Web Site of the UK Inland Revenue,” Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(1): 42-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (www.webqual.co.uk/papers/inlandrevenue.pdf)visited 2005/6/02.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhattancherjee, A. (2000). “Acceptance of E-Commerce Services: The Case of Electronic Brokerages,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(4): 411-420.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhattancherjee, A. (2001). “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model,” MIS Quaterly, 25(3): 351-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brants, K., M. Huizenga & R. van Meerten (1996). “ The New Canals of Amsterdam: An Exercise in Local Electronic Democracy,” Media, Culture & Society, 18: 233-247.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Casaregola, V. & R. A. Cropf (1998). “Virtual Town Halls: Using Computer Networks to Improve Public Discourse and Facilitate Service Delivery,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.iog.ca/policity/CP/Public%20Library/library_reference_virtual_town_halls.html)visited 2005/5/20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baum, C. & A. D. Maio (2000). “Gartner`s Four Phases of E-Government Model,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://aln.hha.dk/IFI/Hdi/2001/ITstrat/Download/Gartner_eGovernment.pdf)visited 2005/7/6.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Conhaim, W. W. (2000). “E-democracy gains ground,” Link – up, 17: 5-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Couper, M. P. (2000). “A Riew of Issues and Approaches,” Public Opinionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quarterly, 64(4): 464-494.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davis, F.D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Userzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi & P. R. Warshaw (1989). “User acceptance ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Science, 35(8): 982-1003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Docter, S. & W. H. Dutton (1998). “The first amendment online: Santazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monica`s public electronic network,” in Tsgarousianou, R., D. Tambinizh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and C. Bryan (eds.), Cyberdemocracy: Technology , cities and civic networks, pp.125-151. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fishbein, M. & I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fisher, B., M. Margolis and D. Resnick (1994). “A New Way of Talking Politics: Democracy on the Internet,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.eff.org/pub/Activism/E-voting/net_civics.survey)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/5/20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Friis, C. S. (1997). “A Critical Evaluation of the Danish National ICT-Strategy,” (http://www.dcu.ie/communications/iegis/Friis.htm)visited 2005/5/20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gr□nlund, □ke (2002). “E-democracy and e-government-state of the art,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/papers/062-090e.pdf)visited 2005/5/18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gr□nlund, □ke (2003). “e-Democracy: in Search of Tools and Methods for Effective Participation,” Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 12: 93-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hacker, K. L. (1996). “Missing Links in the Evolution of Electronic Democratization,” Media, Culture & Society, 18(2): 213-232.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham & W. C. Black (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hunt, H. K. (1977). “CS/D -Overview and Future Research Direction,” in Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction,H. Keith Hunt, ed. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes & G. B. Davis (1995). “Testing the determinants of Microcomputer usage via a structural equation model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4): 87-114.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, S. M. (1998). “The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information Through the Internet,” Administrative Law Review, 50(2): 277-337.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jordan, B. J. (1998). “Collective Learning Online: A Report on the Information Society and Governance Project,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.snafu.de/~mjm/brooks4.html)visited 2005/5/20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kersten, G. E. (2003). “e-Democracy and Participatory Decision Processes: Lessons from e-Nagotiation Experiments,” Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 12: 127-143.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Latour, S. A.&Peat, N. C. (1979). “Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Consumer Satisfaction Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, 6 ed.William L. Wikie. Ann Arbor MI: Association for Consumer Research, pp.431-437.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) OECD (2001). Citizens as partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/4201141E.PDF)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/5/22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) OECD (2003a). The E-government Imperative: Main Findings. Paris.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/60/2502539.pdf)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/7/6.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) OECD (2003b). Promise and Problem of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/4204011E.PDF)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/5/22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oliver, R. L. (1980). “A Cognitive Model for the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17: 460-469.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Phang, C. W., J. Sutanto, Y. Li, A. Kankanhalli (2005). “Senior Citizens’ Adoption of E-Government: In Quest of the Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2005/2268/05/22680130a.pdf)visited 2005/5/20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Planmo, M. (2005). “From Patron-Client to Client-Server: E-democracy in Tanzania?”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (www.cdt.org/egov/handbook/tanzania.pdf)visited 2005/4/20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rose, G., M. Warkentin, D. Gefen & P. Pavlou (1999). “The Role and System Characteristics of Internet-Voting in the Republic of South Africa: Looking Inside a Multi-cultural, Nascent Democracy,”(www.uic.edu/~evaristo/p3.pdf)visited 2005/5/12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruge, M. (2005). “IT and E-Democracy,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (www.bbc.qld.edu.au/resource/files/ITN330Report.pdf)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/5/12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartz, E. I. (1993). “Direct Democracy: Are You Ready for the Democracy Channel?”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.eff.org/pub/Activism/E-voting/democracy_online.article)visited 2005/5/19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spreng, R. A., B. M. Scott & R. W. Olshavsky (1996). “A reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing, 60: 15-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Szajna, B. (1996). “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model,” Management Science, 42(1): 85-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, S. & P.A. Todd (1995a). “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research, 6(2): 144-176.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, S. & P.A. Todd (1995b). “Assesing IT Usage:The Role of Prior Experience,” MIS Quaterly, 19(4):561-571.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Torres, L., V. Pina & B. Acerete (2005). “E-Governance Developments in EU Cities. Reshaping Government Relation to Citizen,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.uc3m.es/uc3m/dpto/EMP/seminar/torres.pdf)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/7/5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Venkatesh, V. & Davis F. D. (1996). “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, 27(3): 451-481.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watson R. T. & B. Mundy (1999). “A strategic perspective of electronic democracy,” Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 44(1): 27-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weare, C., J. A. Musso and M. L. Hale (1999). “Electronic Democracy and the Diffusion of Municipal Web Pages in California,” Administration & Society, 31(1): 3-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) White, C. S. (1997). “Citizen Participation and the Internet: Prospects for Civic Deliberation in the Information Age,” Social Studies, 88(1): 23-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zurita, Laura (2005).“Who is out there? Experiences from a mixed mode participatory experience,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (http://www.trafikdage.dk/writeable/ddnpaper/Paper30.doc)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) visited 2005/4/21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zuurmond, A. (1994). “From Bureaucracy to Infocracy: A Tale of Two Cities,” Informatization and the Public Sector, 3(3): 189-204.zh_TW