學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 從公司治理與產業前景角度檢視盈餘與股價溢酬之關係
From corporate governance and industry foresight to examine the relationship between earnings and stock price premium
作者 陳威任
Chen,Wei Jen
貢獻者 沈中華
Shen,Chung-Hua
陳威任
Chen,Wei Jen
關鍵詞 公司治理
產業前景
兩兆產業分析
corporate governance
industry foresight
industry analysis
日期 2003
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 15:54:34 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究之動機起於麥肯錫顧問公司的調查報告,報告中提到,若企業有良好的公司治理制度,投資者願意支付多一些以持有該公司股票。本研究從公司治理和產業前景兩個角度切入,並參考國內外文獻選出四個代表性的公司治理變數以及從國內券商和金融商情機構所公開之產業研究報告中,建立產業景氣循環相對位置之虛擬變數,目的是量化質性的報告,期望能理出一條脈絡。

根據本研究實証結果可知,就公司治理變數方面,僅有代表資訊揭露品質的指標即”是否有發行海外存託憑證”,此變數與股價溢酬關係為正向且顯著。因此,當我們還在對財務報表的會計師查核簽證感到質疑之時,或是証期會尚未將上市櫃資訊評鑑工作步入正軌之時,本研究所採用之海外存託憑證變數,似乎是現階段可供參考且實用的代表指標;至於所選用之其他公司治理變數,不論董監持股、管理者持股或是否設有獨立董監,都對股價溢酬的影響顯得關係不大,也呼應了行政院對証交法關於獨立董監的設立,採日本以鼓勵自願的做法而非強迫。

就產業前景而言,預測本來就是一件很不容易的工作,更何況是瞬息萬變的高科技產業,由本研究得出的結論恰好與反市場心理法則不謀而合,或許是分析師錯把許多數據指標誤認為是領先指標,並依此對未來前景做預測;但也有可能是現今的投資者都非常的精明,善用反市場心理法則來投資操作,姑且不論問題是出在分析師或是聰明的投資者,但根據本研究,至少發現對兩兆產業而言,若是將產業研究報告建議當作投資的唯一圭臬,似乎並不是明智之舉。
The motivation of the thesis origin from the reports of McKinsey consulting company. According to the reports that institutional investors would willing to pay premium to hold the stock if the company build up well corporate governance institutions. The thesis decide to incise from corporate governance and industry foresight, and then find four representative variables of corporate governance and constitute dummy variables of industry recycle position. The aim is trying to understand which variable would affect premium through earnings-transmitting effect.

Based on the empirical results, with view of corporate governance, the quality of information transparency (whether issue deposit receipt or not) is positive and significant to premium. Consequently it seems to be a practical index when we get confused to the reality of financial reports, moreover, the other variables about corporate governance are nonsignificant including the holding of director and supervisor、the managerial holding or whether constitute the independent director and supervisor. The conclusions about whether constitute independent director and supervisor consist with the act of government which considers that modifying direction of the security law is free to choose instead of forcing every company to do so.

With the view of industry foresight, it’s not a piece of cake to predict how it’s going in the future. According to the results that psychological rule of anti-market seems to be a usable method.

Keywords:Corporate Governance、industry foresight、industry analysis
參考文獻 王興毅,2003,「我國IC製造業現況與趨勢:回顧2002展望2003」,經濟部技術處ITIS專案辦公室,頁13-26
史欽泰,2001,「我國IC產業的發展史與未來展望」,科技發展政策報導
曲威光,2003,「奈米科技產業技術實務」,台北市:新陸書局
沈中華,2004,「投資前的第一堂金融課」,台北市:天下文化
李文惠,2002,「公司治理的角度看銀行風險承擔問題之研究」,中山大學財務管理學研究所碩士未出版之碩士論文。
吳蕙雯,2002,「公司治理對IPOs承銷價與上市後股價表現影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林永松,1993,「在不同長短之累計期間下盈餘對股票報酬解釋能力之比較」,國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
林育雅,1994,「我國上市公司董事會特性與盈餘操縱現象之研究」,台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
柯承恩,2000,我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)(下)。會計研究月刊,
第173期,頁75-81;第174期,頁79-83。
翁淑育,2000,「台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題及公司價值之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
孫文雄,2004,「財訊股市萬用手冊-產業百科全書」,台北市:財訊文化。
孫文雄,2003,「IC、LCD投資入門-股市總覽」,台北市:財訊文化。
專題調查,2002,「液晶顯示器產業及我國液晶顯示器產業之發展機會」,一銀產經資訊,第448期,頁1-44
陳韻如,1999,「盈餘與股價VAR模型之實證研究-台灣上市電子業」,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,「公司治理與評等系統」,台北市:商智文化。
黃婷瑜,2002,「會計資訊與股價關聯性研究-成長型與價值型公司之比較」,淡江大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
張俊雄,2001,「上市公司年度營收與盈餘預測和股票市場之實證分析-以電子業為例」,東華大學國際經濟研究所未出版之碩士論文。
張訓華,1990,「股權結構、董事會組成與企業當年度財務績效—以77年度會計報酬率為準」,東吳大學管理學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
楊俊中,1998,「股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究」,台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
劉容慈,2002,「整合公司治理、會計資訊與總體經濟敏感度之財務危機模型」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版之碩士論文
劉紹樑,2002,「從莊子到安隆— A+公司治理」,台北市:天下雜誌。
Alkhafaji, A.F., 1990, “Effective Board of Directors: An Overview”, Industrial Management and Data System, Vol.90, pp.18-26
Ball, R., and P. Brown, 1968, “An empirical evaluation of accounting income number ”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.6, pp.159-178.
Beaver, W. ,H. Lambert, and S. G. Ryan, 1987, “The Information Content of Security Prices-A Second Look”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.9, pp.139-157
Berle, A., and G. C.Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New
York: MacMillan.
Cadbury , A., 1999, ”What are the Trends in Corporate Governance?How will They Impact Your Company?”, Long Range Planning, Vol.32, pp.12-19
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and H. P. Lang, 2002, “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings”, Journal of Financial, vol57, pp.2741-2770
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and L. Lang, 2000, “East Asian Corporations: Growth,
Financing, and Risks “, Emerging Markets Quarterly, Vol.4, No.1, pp.37-56.
Fan, J., T. Wong, 2002, ”Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp.401-425
Giancarlo , C., P. Pesenti , and N. Roubini, 1998, ”What Caused the Asian Currency and Financial Crisis?”, The World Bank: Working Paper
Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick, 2001, “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” NBER Working Paper, No. 8449.
Gregory, M., and L. Renneboog, 2000,”Insider Control by Large Investor Groups and Managerial Disciplining in Listed Belgian Companies”, Managerial Finance, Vol.26, pp.22-41
Greenspan, C., N. Mark, and S. David, 1998, “ Winning at Mergers and Acquisitions: The Guide to Market-Focused Planning and Integration”, New York:John Wiley & Sons, pp.46
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp.305-360.
Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, and E. Friedman, 2000, “Corporate Governance in the Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.58, pp.141-186.
Krugman, P., 1998, “Saving Asia: It`s Time to Get Radical”, Fortune
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 2002, “Investor protection and corporate valuation”, Journal of Financial, Vol.57, pp.1147-1170
Leland, H. E.,and D. Pyle., 1977, “Informational asymmetries, financial structure ,and financial intermediation”, Journal of Finance, Vol.32, pp.371-387
Mitton, T., 2002, ”A Cross-Firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.64, pp. 215-241
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1988, “Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.293-315.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999, “OECD Principles of Corporate Governance”
Pound, J., 1988, “Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight”,
Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.237-265.
Radelet, S., and J. Sachs, 1998, ”The Onset of east Asian Financial Crisis”, NBER Working Paper 6680.
Rajan, R., and L. Zingales., 1998, “Which Capitalism? Lessons from the East Asian Crisis”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol.11, pp. 40-48.
Shleifer, A., and R.Vishny, 1986,“Large shareholders and corporate control”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.94, pp.461-488.
Wade, R., and F. Veneroso, 1998, “The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model Versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex”, New Left Review, No.228, pp.3-22
World Bank, 1999, “Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation-Overview
“ The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke, 2001, “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan”, International Review of finance, Vol.2, pp.21-48
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟研究所
91258002
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091258002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 沈中華zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Shen,Chung-Huaen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳威任zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen,Wei Jenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳威任zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen,Wei Jenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 15:54:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 15:54:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 15:54:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0091258002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35743-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經濟研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91258002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究之動機起於麥肯錫顧問公司的調查報告,報告中提到,若企業有良好的公司治理制度,投資者願意支付多一些以持有該公司股票。本研究從公司治理和產業前景兩個角度切入,並參考國內外文獻選出四個代表性的公司治理變數以及從國內券商和金融商情機構所公開之產業研究報告中,建立產業景氣循環相對位置之虛擬變數,目的是量化質性的報告,期望能理出一條脈絡。

根據本研究實証結果可知,就公司治理變數方面,僅有代表資訊揭露品質的指標即”是否有發行海外存託憑證”,此變數與股價溢酬關係為正向且顯著。因此,當我們還在對財務報表的會計師查核簽證感到質疑之時,或是証期會尚未將上市櫃資訊評鑑工作步入正軌之時,本研究所採用之海外存託憑證變數,似乎是現階段可供參考且實用的代表指標;至於所選用之其他公司治理變數,不論董監持股、管理者持股或是否設有獨立董監,都對股價溢酬的影響顯得關係不大,也呼應了行政院對証交法關於獨立董監的設立,採日本以鼓勵自願的做法而非強迫。

就產業前景而言,預測本來就是一件很不容易的工作,更何況是瞬息萬變的高科技產業,由本研究得出的結論恰好與反市場心理法則不謀而合,或許是分析師錯把許多數據指標誤認為是領先指標,並依此對未來前景做預測;但也有可能是現今的投資者都非常的精明,善用反市場心理法則來投資操作,姑且不論問題是出在分析師或是聰明的投資者,但根據本研究,至少發現對兩兆產業而言,若是將產業研究報告建議當作投資的唯一圭臬,似乎並不是明智之舉。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The motivation of the thesis origin from the reports of McKinsey consulting company. According to the reports that institutional investors would willing to pay premium to hold the stock if the company build up well corporate governance institutions. The thesis decide to incise from corporate governance and industry foresight, and then find four representative variables of corporate governance and constitute dummy variables of industry recycle position. The aim is trying to understand which variable would affect premium through earnings-transmitting effect.

Based on the empirical results, with view of corporate governance, the quality of information transparency (whether issue deposit receipt or not) is positive and significant to premium. Consequently it seems to be a practical index when we get confused to the reality of financial reports, moreover, the other variables about corporate governance are nonsignificant including the holding of director and supervisor、the managerial holding or whether constitute the independent director and supervisor. The conclusions about whether constitute independent director and supervisor consist with the act of government which considers that modifying direction of the security law is free to choose instead of forcing every company to do so.

With the view of industry foresight, it’s not a piece of cake to predict how it’s going in the future. According to the results that psychological rule of anti-market seems to be a usable method.

Keywords:Corporate Governance、industry foresight、industry analysis
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第 壹 章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第三節 研究流程與論文架構 7

第 貳 章 文獻探討 11
第一節 公司治理 11
第二節 公司治理與亞洲金融風暴 18
第三節 公司治理與經營績效 20
第四節 公司治理與股價溢酬 26
第五節 盈餘與股價報酬 27

第 叁 章 兩兆產業前景分析 30
第一節 前言 30
第二節 IC產業前景分析 32
第三節 LCD產業前景分析 43

第 肆 章 研究設計與實証結果 54
第一節 研究預期 54
第二節 研究對象與資料來源 57
第三節 研究變數操作型定義 59


第 伍 章 實證結果與分析 62
第一節 實証研究方法 62
第二節 實證結果分析 64

第 陸 章 結論與建議 72
第一節 研究結果與發現 72
第二節 研究貢獻 73
第三節 研究限制與後續建議 74

參考文獻
中文部分 75
英文部分 77

圖目錄
圖一:公司治理與財報表現何者重要 4
圖二:是否願支付較高溢酬給公司治理較佳的公司 4
圖三:各國平均溢酬調查報告 5
圖四:研究流程 8
圖五:世界銀行公司治理架構 13
圖六:IC產品分類圖 33
圖七:我國近年來IC產業表現 35
圖八:顯示器分類結構圖 43
圖九:大尺寸TFT-LCD面板需求 46
圖十:全球大尺寸出貨量統計 47
圖十一:15吋LCD面板材料成本結構 48
圖十二:TFT-LCD產業關聯圖 50
圖十三:董監持股比率與股價溢酬分布圖 68

表目錄
表一:92年上市公司股東人數前十大 1
表二:民國87-89年爆發的地雷股名單 3
表三:近年來台灣強化公司治理水準之相關措施 17
表四:IC產業近年產值表現 35
表五:近年來全球DRAM市場情況 37
表六:全球半導體應用市場分布 41
表七:各類顯示器特性比較 44
表八:國內主要筆記型電腦製造商與其客戶群 51
表九:本研究之代表性公司 57
表十:研究樣本簡單統計分析 64
表十一:研究樣本區分年度細項比較 65
表十二:迴歸式一之結果 67
表十三:迴歸式二之結果 69
表十四:迴歸式三之結果 70
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 78988 bytes-
dc.format.extent 104322 bytes-
dc.format.extent 114522 bytes-
dc.format.extent 115735 bytes-
dc.format.extent 241669 bytes-
dc.format.extent 264746 bytes-
dc.format.extent 433040 bytes-
dc.format.extent 216049 bytes-
dc.format.extent 257261 bytes-
dc.format.extent 143308 bytes-
dc.format.extent 137491 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091258002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產業前景zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兩兆產業分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) corporate governanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) industry foresighten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) industry analysisen_US
dc.title (題名) 從公司治理與產業前景角度檢視盈餘與股價溢酬之關係zh_TW
dc.title (題名) From corporate governance and industry foresight to examine the relationship between earnings and stock price premiumen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王興毅,2003,「我國IC製造業現況與趨勢:回顧2002展望2003」,經濟部技術處ITIS專案辦公室,頁13-26zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 史欽泰,2001,「我國IC產業的發展史與未來展望」,科技發展政策報導zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曲威光,2003,「奈米科技產業技術實務」,台北市:新陸書局zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈中華,2004,「投資前的第一堂金融課」,台北市:天下文化zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李文惠,2002,「公司治理的角度看銀行風險承擔問題之研究」,中山大學財務管理學研究所碩士未出版之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳蕙雯,2002,「公司治理對IPOs承銷價與上市後股價表現影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林永松,1993,「在不同長短之累計期間下盈餘對股票報酬解釋能力之比較」,國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林育雅,1994,「我國上市公司董事會特性與盈餘操縱現象之研究」,台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 柯承恩,2000,我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)(下)。會計研究月刊,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 第173期,頁75-81;第174期,頁79-83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翁淑育,2000,「台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題及公司價值之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫文雄,2004,「財訊股市萬用手冊-產業百科全書」,台北市:財訊文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫文雄,2003,「IC、LCD投資入門-股市總覽」,台北市:財訊文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 專題調查,2002,「液晶顯示器產業及我國液晶顯示器產業之發展機會」,一銀產經資訊,第448期,頁1-44zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳韻如,1999,「盈餘與股價VAR模型之實證研究-台灣上市電子業」,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,「公司治理與評等系統」,台北市:商智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃婷瑜,2002,「會計資訊與股價關聯性研究-成長型與價值型公司之比較」,淡江大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張俊雄,2001,「上市公司年度營收與盈餘預測和股票市場之實證分析-以電子業為例」,東華大學國際經濟研究所未出版之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張訓華,1990,「股權結構、董事會組成與企業當年度財務績效—以77年度會計報酬率為準」,東吳大學管理學研究所未出版之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊俊中,1998,「股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究」,台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉容慈,2002,「整合公司治理、會計資訊與總體經濟敏感度之財務危機模型」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版之碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉紹樑,2002,「從莊子到安隆— A+公司治理」,台北市:天下雜誌。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alkhafaji, A.F., 1990, “Effective Board of Directors: An Overview”, Industrial Management and Data System, Vol.90, pp.18-26zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ball, R., and P. Brown, 1968, “An empirical evaluation of accounting income number ”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.6, pp.159-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beaver, W. ,H. Lambert, and S. G. Ryan, 1987, “The Information Content of Security Prices-A Second Look”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.9, pp.139-157zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berle, A., and G. C.Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Newzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) York: MacMillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cadbury , A., 1999, ”What are the Trends in Corporate Governance?How will They Impact Your Company?”, Long Range Planning, Vol.32, pp.12-19zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and H. P. Lang, 2002, “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings”, Journal of Financial, vol57, pp.2741-2770zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and L. Lang, 2000, “East Asian Corporations: Growth,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Financing, and Risks “, Emerging Markets Quarterly, Vol.4, No.1, pp.37-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fan, J., T. Wong, 2002, ”Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp.401-425zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Giancarlo , C., P. Pesenti , and N. Roubini, 1998, ”What Caused the Asian Currency and Financial Crisis?”, The World Bank: Working Paperzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick, 2001, “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” NBER Working Paper, No. 8449.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gregory, M., and L. Renneboog, 2000,”Insider Control by Large Investor Groups and Managerial Disciplining in Listed Belgian Companies”, Managerial Finance, Vol.26, pp.22-41zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenspan, C., N. Mark, and S. David, 1998, “ Winning at Mergers and Acquisitions: The Guide to Market-Focused Planning and Integration”, New York:John Wiley & Sons, pp.46zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp.305-360.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, and E. Friedman, 2000, “Corporate Governance in the Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.58, pp.141-186.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krugman, P., 1998, “Saving Asia: It`s Time to Get Radical”, Fortunezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 2002, “Investor protection and corporate valuation”, Journal of Financial, Vol.57, pp.1147-1170zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leland, H. E.,and D. Pyle., 1977, “Informational asymmetries, financial structure ,and financial intermediation”, Journal of Finance, Vol.32, pp.371-387zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mitton, T., 2002, ”A Cross-Firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.64, pp. 215-241zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1988, “Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.293-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999, “OECD Principles of Corporate Governance”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pound, J., 1988, “Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight”,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.237-265.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Radelet, S., and J. Sachs, 1998, ”The Onset of east Asian Financial Crisis”, NBER Working Paper 6680.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rajan, R., and L. Zingales., 1998, “Which Capitalism? Lessons from the East Asian Crisis”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol.11, pp. 40-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, A., and R.Vishny, 1986,“Large shareholders and corporate control”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.94, pp.461-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wade, R., and F. Veneroso, 1998, “The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model Versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex”, New Left Review, No.228, pp.3-22zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) World Bank, 1999, “Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation-Overviewzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “ The World Bank, Washington D.C.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke, 2001, “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan”, International Review of finance, Vol.2, pp.21-48zh_TW