公共行政的黑堡觀點及其認識論之研究

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

html(486)

Publication Export

Google Scholar^TM

題名	公共行政的黑堡觀點及其認識論之研究 The Study in Blacksburg Perspective and It`s Epistemology of Public Administration
作者	許立一 Li-Yi Hsu
貢獻者	林鍾沂<br>吳秀光 Chung-Yi Lin<br>Samuel S. Wu 許立一 Li-Yi Hsu
關鍵詞	黑堡宣言黑堡觀點民主行政後實證主義結構主義後結構主義現代主義後現代主義 blacksburg manifesto blacksburg perspective democratic administration postpositivism structuralism poststructuralism modernism postmodernism
日期	2001
上傳時間	18-Sep-2009 17:02:05 (UTC+8)
摘要	公共行政在治理過程（process of governance）中應該居於何種地位與扮演什麼角色？其是否完全與政治無關，而且不負任何社會公義之價值議題的倡導責任？它應該如同市場取向的行政學者所言——追求小政府（minimal government），還是應該竭盡所能地回應社會的需求？公共行政人員應該著重專業技術，還是倫理思考？一九八○年代初期，六位美國維吉尼亞多元理工學院暨州立大學（Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University）的學者，有感於當時的行政學術之發展似乎無法釐清前述的課題，而新公共行政（New Public Administration）的主張並未能在實務上發揮作用，又鑑於當時一股貶責官僚（bureaucracy bashing）之風盛行。是以，他（她）們撰寫了一篇名為〈公共行政與治理過程：轉變政治對話〉（Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the Political Dialogue）的文章。因為維吉尼亞州立大學的所在地名為黑堡，故該文亦被學者簡稱為黑堡宣言（Blacksburg Manifesto）。黑堡宣言試圖針對前述課題，提出一些規範性的主張，俾以解決當代公共行政所遭遇的學術與實務的雙重困境。該宣言認為重建公共行政在治理過程中的正當性，乃是化解危機的核心。本論文研究的範圍不限於黑堡宣言一文，而是該宣言首席撰寫者Gary L. Wamsley所稱之黑堡觀點（Blacksburg Perspective）。所謂黑堡觀點，乃是以黑堡宣言為主軸，所發展出來的一系列的論述（discourse）。換言之，就是在黑堡宣言提出重建公共行政（refounding public administration）之主張後，陸續衍生的一些相關研究以及其中所提出的觀念。本論文希望探究：黑堡觀點針對上述課題所提供的論述為何？進而藉由認識論（epistemology）的分析，瞭解它立於何種哲學基礎之上，俾以達成所宣稱的境界？同時，也希望能夠檢視黑堡觀點本身的限制所在，提供後續相關研究的思考線索。最後，作者更嘗試提出一些補充性的見解，希望能在學術上有所貢獻。基於上述的研究動機和目的，本論文的各章的鋪陳內容如下：第一章緒論，說明本論文的研究動機與目的、基本概念界定、研究主題以及方法；第二章黑堡觀點的內涵，將探討黑堡觀點在美國行政學術中的定位及其思想淵源，並還原黑堡宣言一文的重要主張，進而以黑堡觀點反思傳統的行政理論和新公共管理；第三章黑堡觀點的認識論之分析，則分別探討其所蘊含的結構主義與後結構主義之色彩，進而提出前述兩種思維是否能夠共存的見解；第四章民主行政的實踐，則是根據第二、三章的論述為基礎，進一步耙梳黑堡觀點之下的民主行政之內涵，包括公共行政參與治理的正當性、公共利益、公共對話、公民意識、公共行政人員等課題；第五章結論，以前述的民主行政之實踐意涵，歸納黑堡點的特色及其在公共行政理念上的影響，並指出其理論的內在弔詭。然後，對照我國行政實務，試舉例說明黑堡觀點的啟發。最後，指出本論文的研究限制以及作者對後續研究的建議。本論文的特色在於，超越相關的研究，針對黑堡觀點的認識論進行分析，此實為一種開創性的研究。抑有進者，作者認為本論文應能夠產生如后的貢獻：第一，提供不同於時下流行之管理途徑的觀點，刺激學界思索其它的研究途徑；第二，為後續有興趣於此一途徑的研究者，奠定初步的基礎，至少本論文在理論耙梳和認識論的分析方面，應該有所助益；第三，作者提出對於黑堡觀點之內在弔詭的反省，以及從實務的角度思考黑堡觀點的實踐意涵，希望能夠做為後續研究的線索和方向。第一章緒論••••••••••••••••••••••••1 第一節研究動機•••••••••••••••••1 第二節研究目的•••••••••••••••••3 第三節基本概念的界定••••••••••••••4 第四節研究主題與方法••••••••••••••16 第二章黑堡觀點的內涵••••••••••••••••••23 第一節黑堡觀點的興起及其與新公共行政的關係•••25 第二節黑堡宣言的主張••••••••••••••44 第三節以黑堡觀點反思傳統的行政理論•••••••61 第四節以黑堡觀點反思新公共管理•••••••••83 第三章黑堡觀點的認識論之分析••••••••••••117 第一節黑堡觀點的結構主義色彩••••••••••118 第二節黑堡觀點的後結構主義傾向•••••••••151 第三節結構主義與後結構主義的共容性之探討••••187 第四章黑堡觀點之民主行政的實踐••••••••••••197 第一節公共行政參與治理的正當性•••••••••198 第二節公共利益•••••••••••••••••218 第三節公共對話•••••••••••••••••251 第四節公民意識•••••••••••••••••275 第五節公共行政人員•••••••••••••••293 第五章結論•••••••••••••••••••••••317 第一節黑堡觀點的特色及其影響••••••••••317 第二節黑堡觀點的內在弔詭與限制•••••••••326 第三節黑堡觀點對我國行政實務的啟發•••••••334 第四節本論文的研究限制與對後續研究的建議••••355 參考資料••••••••••••••••••••••••••361 This thesis concerned about the legitimacy of public administration in the process of governance. Since administrative management and behavioralism rise the efficiency became the subject matter in public administration. However, Blacksburg Manifesto reminds us the public administration can not be equal with management and efficiency are not public administration`s only value. So, the author of this thesis is interested in Blacksburg Perspective`s refounding public administration. This study includes Blacksburg Perspective`s discourse about public administration and these discourses` epistemology. Firstly, the author summarizes Blacksburg Manifesto and induces characters of the Manifesto. Secondly, he criticizes traditional public management and new public management bases on the Blacksburg Perspective. Thirdly, to analyze the epistemology of Blacksburg Perspective includes structuralism and poststructuralism. Fourthly, this study introduces the implications of democratic public administration of Blacksburg Perspective. Fifthly, the author bases on Blacksburg Perspective rethink administrative practice in his country. Finally, to examine theoretical paradoxes of Blacksburg Perspective. The Author hopes this study is helpful for students are interested in this relative field about democratic public administration and by this thesis we can think about how to refound the legitimacy of public administration in process of governance.
參考文獻	一、中文部分（一）專書及學位論文《牛津大辭典》 1989 台北：旺文社。王又如譯 R. Tarnas著 1995 《西方心靈的激情》，台北：正中書局。王寧、顧棟華、黃桂友、趙白生譯 D. Fokkema & H. Bertens編 1992 《走向後現代主義》，台北：淑馨出版。毛榮富 1991 〈傅柯〉，《當代西方思想先河》（葉啟政編），台北：正中書局。江岷欽 1988 《勞斯的正義論解說》，台北：遠流出版。蔡源煌 1992 《從浪漫主義到後現代主義︰文學術語的新詮》，台北︰雅典出版。蔡錚雲 1995 《從現象學到後現代》，台北：自印。趙一凡、蒲隆、任曉晉譯 D. Bell著 1989 《資本主義的文化矛盾》，台北：桂冠圖書。歐崇亞 1997 《新制度主義與公共組織分析》，東海大學公共行政系碩士學位論文。鄒理民譯 P. L. Berger & T. Luckmann著 1993 《組織分析》，台北：五南圖書。 1991 《社會實體的建構》，台北：桂冠圖書。談谷錚譯 J. M. Barbalet著 1991 《公民資格》，台北：桂冠圖書。廖仁義譯 1991 E. Pivcevic著《胡賽爾與現象學》，台北：桂冠圖書。 1992 A. Giddens著《批判的社會學導論》，台北：唐山出版。劉北成譯 1992 J. Galbraith著江岷欽、林鍾沂《權力的剖析》，台北：時報文化。 1994 J. Habermas著《合法化危機》，台北：桂冠圖書。劉北成、楊遠櫻譯 M. Foucault著 1992a 《規訓與懲罰：監獄的誕生》，台北：桂冠圖書。 1992b 《瘋顛與文明》（劉北成、楊遠櫻譯），台北：桂冠圖書。劉軍寧譯 S. P. Huntington著 1994 《第三波：二十世紀末的民主化浪潮》，台北：五南圖書。劉象愚譯 I. Hassan著 1993 《後現代的轉向︰後現代理論與文化論文集》，台北：時報文化。 1995 《公共組織理論》，台北：國立空大。劉絮凱譯 M. Foucault著 1994 《臨床醫學的誕生》，台北：時報文化。劉繼譯 H. Marcuse著 1990 《單向度的人︰發達工業社會意識型態研究》，台北：桂冠圖書。鄭祥福 1995 《李歐塔》，台北：生智出版。盧嵐蘭譯 A. Schutz 1991 《社會世界的現象學》，台北：桂冠圖書。顧忠華譯 M. Weber著 1993 《社會學的基本概念》，台北：遠流出版。朱元鴻、馬彥彬、方孝鼎、張崇熙、李世明譯 S. Best & D. Kellner著顧忠華 1994 《韋伯學說新探》，台北：唐山出版。顧淑馨譯 P. Kennedy著 1993 《創世紀》，台北：天下文化。（二）期刊與研討會論文沈清松 1993 〈從現代到後現代〉，《哲學雜誌》，第4期，4-25頁。余致力 2000 〈論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色：黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示〉，《公共行政學報》（國立政治大學公共行政系），第4期，1-2頁。汪明輝 1994 《後現代理論：批判的質疑》，台北：巨流圖書。網頁〈原住民運動空間性〉，刊載於http://www.geo.ntnu.edu.tw/faculty/tibu/ 原住民運動空間性摘要.htm。李謁政 1999 〈建構社區美學：邁向台灣集體記憶之空間美學〉，文建會主辦「1999 社區美學研討會」，地點：台北。吳瓊恩、張世杰 1995 〈公共行政與人文主義的回顧及反省〉，《中國行政評論》，第4卷，第2期，37-68頁。林春明 1993 〈後結構主義與差異哲學〉，《哲學雜誌》，第4期，42-49頁。林鍾沂、許立一 1998 〈我國政府再造推動計畫的政策弔詭：SWOT的分析架構〉，國立台灣大學政治系主辦「行政現代化：兩岸學術研討會」宣讀論文。地點：台北台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。林鍾沂、許立一沈清松編 1999 〈後現代主義之下的公共行政〉，世新大學行政管理系主辦「民主行政與政府再造學術研討會」宣讀之論文，地點：台北世新大學。唐力權 1993 〈權力、意志與詮釋：尼采的透視主義與後現代思想〉，《哲學雜誌》，，第4期，26-41頁。陳金貴 1990 〈從兩次明瑙布魯克會議看美國公共行政學的發展〉，《美國月刊》，第 4卷第9期，110-117頁。許立一 1995a 〈文官行政中立：困境的檢視與概念的新詮〉，《行政學報》，第26期， 31-48頁。 1995b 〈從公共選擇途徑論全民健保保費政策之制定〉，《中國行政評論》，第 5卷，第1期，131-152頁。 1997a 〈現代主義與後現代主義的辯證：功能論之認識論的反思〉，《公共行政學報》（國立政治大學公共行政系），第1期，175-197頁。 1997b 〈後現代主義對公共行政之意涵：理論意象的評估〉，《行政學報》（國立中興大學公共行政系出版），第28期，149-199頁。 1990 《時代心靈之鑰》，台北：正中書局。 1998 〈後現代主義對組織分析之意涵〉，《行政學報》（國立中興大學公共行政系出版），第29期，315-343頁。 1999 〈官僚制的後現代解構〉，國立政治大學主辦「國立政治大學八十七學年度研究生研究成發表會」宣讀論文。地點：台北政治大學。 1999 〈官僚制之理念的探討：組織的解構與重構〉，《公共行政學報》（國立政治大學公共行政系出版），第3期，301-316頁。 1999 〈公共行政的後現代危機及其解決：兼論行政改革之ReGo模型的限制〉，中民國公共行政學會主辦「海峽兩岸行政管理學術研討會」宣讀論文，地點：上海上海大學行政管理系。 1999 〈後現代主義與公共行政：理論與實務的反思〉，《行政暨政策學報》（國立中興大學公共行政系出版），第1期，219-266頁。彭文賢 1999 〈邁向後現代組織理論？〉，《中國行政評論》，第8卷，第4期，63-82 頁。蔡錚雲 1993 〈後現代的哲學論述是如何可能的？德里達對胡塞爾現象學的解構〉，《哲學雜誌》，第4期，50-67頁。呂育誠、陳恆鈞、陳菁雯、劉淑惠譯 D. H. Rosenbloom著（三）報紙中時晚報 2001/3/22 「去年５２０後簡任以上高級文官異動狀況表」（圖表統計），2 版。 2001/05/17 「挑戰死神陳老師等嘸肝剩二天生命」，6版。中國時報 2001/2/26 「官僚機制港星澳效率亞洲之冠」，2版。 2001/3/22 「撤換事務官張揆不否認」，3版。 2001/3/23 「在野黨：政務官無能才是問題」，4版。 2001/5/22 「陳希聖案衛署同意專案特准接受五親等捐肝」，6版。 2001/5/24 「器官捐贈與移植的省思」，15版。 2000 《公共行政學》，台北：學富文化。台灣日報 2000/12/13 「軍公教暫緩調薪具有減緩經濟危機的指標意義」，2版。 2001/3/31 「舊官僚包圍民進黨無外交」，4版。民生報 2000/12/14 「軍公教共體時艱？」，2版。 2001/3/23 「文官體系立院質詢焦點」，A4版。 2001/5/19 「誰殺了大學講師」，A9版。 2001/5/19 「台大著手三親等外活體配對」，A9版。民眾日報 2000/12/13 「共體時艱」，3版。仰哲出版社西洋哲學編譯小組譯 R. Descartes等著 2000/12/15 「頭家日子難過公僕何妨共體時艱」，2版。自由時報 2000/12/15 「縮編緩加薪救競爭力」，15版。 2001/3/23 「林豐正：勿因顏色不同就亂換人」，4版。李慶雄 2001/3/22 「當舊官僚成了新政府眼中的廢物冗員」，聯合報，15版。林端 2000/12/27 「無能的新官僚更可怕」，聯合晚報，2版。金恆煒 2000/12/14 「緩薪案民進黨提出有理」，台灣日報，4版。 1982 《西歐理性論哲學資料選輯》，台北：仰哲出版。勁報 2000/12/12 「DPP時機、動機很可議」，N2版。黃一峰 2001/5/15 「學者：文官消極造成寂靜危機」（專訪），聯合晚報，4版。黃昭順 2001/3/23 「全是文官體系的錯嗎」，中央日報，19版。黃爾璇 2001/3/4 「政院切莫淪為舊官僚的傀儡」，台灣日報，3版。曾家倫 2000/10/24 「失業率VS.公務員加薪」，民眾日報，3版。仰哲出版社西洋哲學編譯小組譯 F. Bacon等著經濟日報 2000/12/13 「如意算盤未必如意」，4版。衛民 2000/10/25 「公僕難為別再讓公僕難過」，聯合報，15版。聯合報 2001/5/18 「陳希聖罹猛爆性肝炎輔大講師等肝救命」，6版。 2001/5/19 「礙於法律難換肝立委為病人請命盼先以行政命令放寬捐肝者條件」，6版。聯合晚報 2000/12/12 「要刮別人薪水先刮自己的」，3版。 2000/12/13 「公務員薪事」（圖表統計），2版。 1984 《英國經驗論哲學資料選輯》，台北：仰哲出版。 2001/3/22 「周伯倫：行政院長都換人難道文官不能動」，2版。（四）古籍毛文銓（清雍正四年正月初四日）網頁「奏報請撫臺灣生番摺」，刊載於http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~pingpu/library/ fulltext/npmdatabase/yun021.htm。吳承恩（明代）網頁《西遊記》，刊載於http://www.angelibrary.com/oldies/xiyouji/ xiyouji.html。佛教經典網頁《大乘遍照光明藏無字法門經》，刊載於http://www.a-mita.com.tw/ 李永熾譯 F. Fukuyama著 libe/hung_a_l_70.html。網頁《達摩血脈論》，刊載於http://mail.ht.net.tw/~yoga/d6.htm。網頁《達摩無心論》，刊載於http://mail.ht.net.tw/~yoga/d7.htm。二、英文部分（一）專書 Bailey, M. T., & Mayer R. T. (1992). (Eds.). Public Management in an Interconnected World: Essays in the Minnowbrook Tradition. New York: Greenwood Press. Bailey, M. T. (1992). Beyond Rationality: Decisionmaking in a Interconnected World. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Eds.). Public Management in an Interconnected World (33-52). New York: Greenwood Press. Baradat, L. P. (1991). Political Ideologies. (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.. Barbalet, J. M. (1988). Citizenship. Minneapolis, Minn.: The University of Minnesota Press. Barber, B. (1986). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, C. A.: University of California Press. 1993 《歷史之終結與最後一人》，台北：時報文化。 Barnard, C. I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Barth, T. J. (1996). Administering in the Public Interest: the Facilitative Role for PublicAdministrators. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (168-197). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc.. Baum, H. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (307). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Baynes, K. (1992). The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, and Habermas. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press. Behn, R. D. (1991). Leadership Counts: Lessons for Public Managers from the Massachusetts Welfare, Training, and Employment Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart. Berkeley and Los Angeles, C. A. : University of California Press. ——— (1992). The Good Society. New York, N. Y.: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.. Bergquist W. (1993). The Postmodern Organization: Mastering the Art of Irreversible Change. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Inc.. Bernstein, R. J. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. London, U. K.: Metheu & Co. Ltd.. ——— (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. 李茂興、李慕華、林宗鴻譯 S. P. Robbins著 ——— (1991). The New Constellation: the Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press. Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to Social Enquiry. Oxford, U. K.: Polity Press. Bottomore, T. B., & Mulkay, M. J. (Eds.). (1984). The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London, U. K.: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.. Botwinick, A. (1993). Postmodernism and Democratic Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Bozeman, B. (1993). (Ed.). Public Management: the State of the Art. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers. ——— (1993). Introduction: Two Concepts of Public Management. In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public Management: the State of the Art (1-5). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Bradley, D. R. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (307). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Hants, England: Gower Publishing Company Limited. Callinicos, A. T. (1989). Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press. 1992 《組織行為》，台北：揚智文化。 Canetti, E. (1963). Crowds and Powers. New York, N. Y.: Viking. Catron, B. L. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (308). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Chandler, R. C. (Ed.). (1987). A Centennial History of the American Administrative State. New York: Macmillan. Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Clay, J. A. (1996). Public-Institutional Processes and Democratic Governance. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (92-113). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. Clegg, S. R. (1994). Max Weber and contemporary sociology of organizations. In L. J. Ray & M. Reed (Eds.), Organizing Modernity (pp. 46-80). New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Cohen, I. J. (1989). Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. London, U. K.: Macmillan Education Ltd.. Cooke, D. O. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (310). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Crook, S., Pakulski, J., & Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. 李連江 Dallmayr, F. R. (1981). Beyond Dogma and Despair: Toward a Critical Phenomenology of Politics. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. ——— (1987). Critical Encounters: Between Philosophy and Politics. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. Davis, G., & Weller, P. (1996). (Eds.). New Ideas, Better Government. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.. Denhardt, R. B. (1993). Theories of Public Organization. C. A.: Wadsworth, Publishing Inc.. Dennard, L. F. (1990). The Maturation of Public Administration: the Search for a Democratic Identity. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (293-326). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. Dimock, M. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (308). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press. Dudley, L. (1996). Fencing in the Inherently Governmental Debate. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (68-91). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. Dunleavy, P., & O’Leary, B. (1987). Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. New York, N. Y.: The Macmillan Press Ltd.. 1993 《新保守主義》，台北：揚智出版。 Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.. Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding Public Policy (7th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.. Edge, H. L. (1994). A Constructive Postmodern Perspective on Self and Community: from Atomism to Holism. Lewiston, N. Y.: The Edwin Mellen Press. Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The Elite Connection: Problems and Potential of Western Democracy. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press. Farmer, D. J. (1995). The Language of Public Administration: Bureaucracy, Modernity, and Postmodernity. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press. ——— (1998). (Ed.). Papers on the Art of Anti-Administration. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press. Fay, B. (1976). Social Theory and Political Practice. New York, N. Y.: Holmes & Meuer Publishers, Inc.. ——— (1987). Critical Social Science: Liberation and Its Limits. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press. Flathman, R. (1966). The Public Interest: An Essay Concerning the Normative Discourse of Politics. New York, N. Y.: Wiley. 吳曲輝等譯 J. H. Turner著 Fox, C. J., & Miller H. T. (1995). Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publication, Inc.. Frederickson, H. G. (1997). The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Gaarder, J. (1995). Sophie’s World (P. Moller, Trans.). London, U. K.: Phoenix, Orion Books Ltd.. (Original work published 1991). Gane M., & Johnson, T. (1993). Foucault’s New Domains. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Garson, G. D., & Overman, E. S. (1983). Public Management Research in the United States. New York, N. Y.: Praeger Publishers. Garston, N. (Ed.) (1993). Bureaucracy: Three Paradigms. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Garvey, G. (1993). Facing the Bureaucracy: Living and Dying in a Public Agency. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers. Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. London, U. K.: Hutchinson. ——— (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, C. A.: University of California Press. ——— (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, C. A.: University of California Press. 1992 《社會學理論的結構》，台北：桂冠圖書。 ——— (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford, C. A.: Stanford University Press. ——— (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press. Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and Their Design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design (1-53). Cambridge, U. K.: The University of Cambridge Press. Goodnow, F. J. (1992). Politics and Administration. Reprinted In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (25-28). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company. Goodsell, C. T. (1990). Public Administration and the Public Interest. In G. L. Wamsley et al. (Eds.), Refounding Public Administration (96-113). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. ——— (1994). The Case for Bureaucracy: a Public Administration Polemic (3rd Ed.). Chatham, N. J.: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.. ——— (1998). Public Architecture as Social Anchor in the Postmodern Age. In D. J. Farmer (Ed.). Papers on the Art of Anti-Administration. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press. Gore, A. (1993). Report of the National Performance Review: Creating a Government that Works Better & Costs Less. Washington, DC: The White House. Gray, J. (1993). Beyond the New Right. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Green, R. T., & Hubbell, L. (1996). On Governance and Reinventing Government. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (38-67). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. 吳庚 Grindle, M. S., & Thomas, J. W. (1991). Public Choices and Policy Change: the Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Gulick, L. (1992). Notes on the Theory of Organization. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (80-89). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company. Haber, H. F. (1994). Beyond Postmodern Politics: Lyotard, Rorty, Foucault. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.). (1995). The Enduring Challenges in Public Management: Surviving an Excelling in a Changing Word. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Inc.. Ham, C., & Hill, M. (1997). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State (3rd Ed.). New York, N. Y.: Harvester Wheatsheaf Ltd.. Harmon, M. M. (1981). Action Theory for Public Administration. New York, N. Y.: Longman Inc.. Harmon, M. M., ＆ Mayer, R. T. (1986). Organization Theory for Public Administration. Boston: Little, Brown ＆ Company. Hassard, J. (1993). Postmodernism and Organization Analysis: An Overview. In J. Hassard, & M. Parker (Eds.), Postmodernism and Organizations (1-24). New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Heckscher, C., & Donnellon, A. (Eds.) (1994). The Post-Bureaucratic Organization. Newbury Park. C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd.. Heller, A., & Feher, F. (1988). The Postmodern Political Condition. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press. 1993 《韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎》，台北：聯經出版。 Henry, N. (1992). Public Administration and Public Affairs (5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.. Hill, L. B. (1992). (Ed.). The State of Public Bureaucracy. New York, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.. Hollinger, R. (1994). Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: a Thematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd.. Hood, C. (1998). The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press. Hughes, O. E. (1998). Public Management and Administration (2nd Ed.). New York, N. Y.: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.. Ingraham, P. W., & Romzek, B. S. (1994). Issues Raised by Current Reform Efforts. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service (1-14). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Jameson, F. (1981). The Political Unconsciousness: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press. Jun, J. S. (1986). Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving. New York, N. Y.: Publishing Company. Kettl, D. F. (1993). Searching for Clues about Public Management: Slicing the Onion Different Ways. In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public Management: the State of the Art (55-68). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers. ——— (1994). Managing on the Frontiers of Knowledge: the Learning Organization. In P. W. Ingraham et al. (Co-authored). New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service (19-40). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 吳瓊恩 Kettl, D. F., & Milward, H. B. (1996). (Eds.). The State of Public Management. Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lane, L. M. (1996). The Public Administration and the Problem of the Presidency. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (225-259). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. Law, J. Organization, Narrative and Strategy. In J. Hassard, & M. Parker (Eds.), Toward a New Theory of Organizations (248-268). New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Linden, R. M. (1994). Seamless Government: Practical Guide to Re-engineering in Public Sector. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Little, J. H. (1996). Thinking Government: Bring Democratic Awareness to Public Administration. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (327-350). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. Luke, J. S. (1992). Managing Interconnectedness: the New Challenge for Public Administration. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Ed.). Public Management in an Interconnected World. (13-32). New York: Greenwood Press. Lynn, Jr., L. E. (1996). Public Management as Art, Science, and Profession. Chatham, N. J.: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.. Lyotard, Jean-Francois (1984). The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge. (G. Bennington, & B. Massouri, Trans.). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. 1992 《行政學的範圍與方法》，台北：五南圖書。 ——— (1988). The Differend: Phrase in Dispute. (G. Van Den Abbeele, Trans.). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. Lyotard, Jean-Francois, & Thebaund, Jean-Loup (1985). Just Gaming. (W. Godzich, Trans.). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. March, J. G., & Olsen J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics. New York, N. Y.: Free Press. Marini, F. (1971). (Ed.). Toward a New Public Administration: the Minnowbrook Perspective. New York, N. Y.: Chandler Publishing Co.. ——— (1971). The Minnowbrook Perspective and the Future of Public Administration Education. In F. Marini, (Ed.), Toward a New Public Administration: the Minnowbrook Perspective (346-367). New York, N. Y.: Chandler Publishing Co.. ——— (1992). Introduction. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Ed.). Public Management in an Interconnected World. (1-9). New York: Greenwood Press. May, T. (1995). The Moral Theory of Poststructuralism. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. McCollough T. E. (1991). The Moral Imagination and Public Life. Chatam, N. J.: Chatam House Publishers. McSwite, O. C. (1996). Postmodernism, Public Administration, and the Public Interest. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (198-224). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc.. McSwite, O. C. (1997d). Legitimacy in Public Administration: A Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc.. 1996 《行政學》，台北：三民書局。 ——— (1998). Stories from the “Real World”: Administering Anti-Administratively. In D. J. Farmer (Ed.). Papers on the Art of Anti-Administration. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press. Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (1997). Postmodernism, “Reality”, & Public Administration: A Discourse. Burke, Virginia: Chatelaine Press. Milward, H. B. (1994). Implications of Contracting Out: New Roles for the Hollow State. In J. L. Perry. (Ed.), New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service (41-62). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Morgan, D. F. (1994). The Public Interest. In , T. L. Cooper (Ed.) Handbook of administrative ethics. New York, N. Y.: Marcel Dekker. Morgan, G. (1986). Image of Organization. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd.. ——— (1993). Imanginization: The Art of Creative Management. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd.. ——— (1998). Images of Organization: the Executive Edition. Thousand, C. A.: Sage Publications. Nietzsche, F. (1967). The Will to Power (W. Kaufman & R. J. Hollingdale Trans.). New York, N. Y.: Vintage Books. Oldfield, A. (1990). Citizenship and Community: Civic Republicanism and Modern World. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. 2001 《行政學》（二版），台北：三民書局。 O’Nell, J. (1995). The Poverty of Postmodernism. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.. Ostrom, V. (1974). The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: The University of Alabama Press. Palmer, D. D. (1999). Structuralism and Poststructuralism for Beginners. New York, N. Y.: Writers and Readers Publishing Inc.. Parkin, J. (1994). Public Management: Technocracy, Democracy and Organizational Reform. Brookfield, Vermont: Avebury Ashgate Publishing Limited. Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Company. Perry, J. L. (1994). (Ed.). New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers. Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science: the New Instituionalism. New York, N. Y.: Pinter. ——— (1996). Models of Governance for the 1990s. In D. F. Kettl, & H. B. Milward (Eds.), The State of Public Management (15-44). Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Peters, G., & Savoie, D. J. (1995). (Eds.). Governance in a Changing Environment. Montreal, Canada: Canadian Centre for Management Development. 林鍾沂 Pierre, J. (1995). The Markitization of the State: Citizens, Consumers, and the Emergence of the Public Market. In G. Peters, & D. J. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a Changing Environment (55-81). Montreal, Canada: Canadian Centre for Management Development. Poster, M. (1989). Critical Theory and Poststructuralism: in Search of Context. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press. ——— (1990). The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). (Eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organization Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Power, M. (1990). Modernism, postmodernism, and organization. In J. Hssard, & D. Pym (Eds.), The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations: Critical Issue and New Perspectives (109-136). New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Preston, N., Sampford, C., & Bois, C-A. (1998). Ethics and Political Practice: Perspectives on Legislative Ethics. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Price, D. K. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (309). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press. Reed, M. I. (1992). The Sociology of Organization. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. 1991 《公共政策與批判理論》，台北：遠流出版。 ——— (1994). Max Weber and the Dilemmas of Modernity. In L. J. Ray, & M. Reed (Eds.), Organizing Modernity (158-197). New York, N. Y.: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Reich, R. B. (Ed.). (1988). The Power of Public Ideas. Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University Press. Rein, M. (1976). Social Science and Public Policy. New York: Penguin. Reisman, D. (1990). Theory of Collective Action: Downs, Olson, and Hirsh. New York. N. Y.: St. Martin’s Press. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Open University Press. Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1996). Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers. Rohr, J. A. (1986). To Run a Constitution: the Legitimacy of the Administrative State. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ——— (1990). The Constitutional Case for public Administration. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (52-95). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Rosenbloom, D. H. (1998). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector (4th Ed.). New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Co.. Sarup, M. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism (2nd Ed.). Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press. 1991 《公共事務的設計與執行》，台北：幼獅文化。 Schatzki, T. R. (1993). Theory at Bay: Foucault, Lyotard, and Politics of the Local. In J. P. Jones III, W. Natter, & T. R. Schatzki, (Eds.). Postmodern Contentions: Epochs, Politics, Space (39-64). New York, N. Y.: The Guilford Press. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press. Self, P. (2000). Rolling Back the Market: Economic Dogma and Political Choice. London, U. K.: Macmillan Press Ltd.. Seligman, A. B. (1992). The Idea of Civil Society. New York, N. Y.: The Free Press. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, N. Y.: Currency Doubleday. Shafritz J. M., & Hyde A. C. (Eds.). (1992). Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company. Shafritz J. M., & Ott, J. S. (Eds.). (1996). Classics of Organization Theory (4th Ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace College publisher. Shand, D. (1996). Are We Reinventing Government? In G. Davis & P. Weller (Eds.), New Ideas, Better Government (64-73). St. Leonard, Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.. Sherick, J. H. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (307). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Sim, S. (1992). Beyond Aesthetics: Confrontations with Poststructuralism and Postmodernism. New York, N. Y.: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 1994 《政策分析的理論與實踐》，台北：瑞興圖書。 Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization (4th Ed.). New York, N. Y.: The Free Press. Simons, H. W., & Billing, M. (Eds.). (1994). After Postmodernism: Reconstructuring Ideology Critique. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd.. Smart, B. (1993). Postmodernity. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. Stever, J. A. (2000). The Path to Organizational Skepticism. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press. Stivers, C. M. (1990). Active Citizenship and Public Administration. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (246-273). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. ——— (1996). Refusing to Get It Right: Citizenship, Difference and the Refounding Project. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (260-278). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. Taylor, F. (1992). Scientific Management. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (29-32). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company. Tery, G. (1998). Solidarity and Difference: the Politics of Enlightenment in the Aftermath of Modernity. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press. Tong, R. (1986). Ethics in Public Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.. Turner, B. S. (Ed.). (1993). Citizenship and Social Theory. Newbury Park. C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd.. 2001 《行政學》，台北：三民書局。 Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Switzerland: Paul Haupt Berne. Waldo, D. (Ed.). (1971). Public Administration in a Time of Turbulence. New York, N. Y.: Chandler Publishing Company. Wamsley, G. L., Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Wamsley, G. L. (1990a). Preface. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (6-18). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. ——— (1990b). Introduction. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (19-29). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. ——— (1990c). The Agency Perspective: Public Administrators as Agential Leaders. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (19-29). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. ——— (1996). A Public Philosophy and Ontological Disclosure as the Basis for Normatively Grounded Theorizing in Public Administration. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (351-401). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. Wamsley, G. L., Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the political Dialogue. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (31-51). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Wamsley, G. L., & Wolf, J. F. (Eds.). (1996). Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges. Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. ——— (1996). Introduction: Can a High-Modern Project Find Happiness in a Postmodern Era? In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (1-37). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. 林鍾沂譯 H. A. Simon著 Weber, M. (1992). Bureaucracy. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classic of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (248-268). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company. Weinberg, L. (1996). Understanding Social Process: the Key to Democratic Governance. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (279-292). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage. White, J. D. (1991). From Modernity to Postmodernity: Two Views of Planning and Public Administration. Public Administration Review. Vol. 51, No. 6, 564-568. ——— (1992). Knowledge Development and Use in Public Administration: Views from Postpositivism, Poststructuralism, and Postmodernism. In Bailey M. T., & Mayer R. T. (Eds.), Public Management in an Interconnected World (159-176). New York: Greenwood Press. ——— (1999). Taking Language Seriously: the Narrative Foundations of Public Administration Research. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press. White, O. F. (1990). Reframing the Authority/Participation Debate. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (182-245). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. White, O. F., & McSwain, C. (1990). The Phoenix Project: Raising Public Administration from the Ashes of the Past. In H. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and Identities in Public Administration (23-59). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage. Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: the Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. London, U. K.: transaction Publishers. Wilson, W. (1992). The Study of Administration. Reprinted In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (11-24). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company. Wolf, J. F. (1996). Moving Beyond Prescriptions: Making Sense of Public Administration Action Contexts. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (141-167). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc.. 1988 《人類事務的理性》，台北：森大圖書。 Yeatman, A. (1994). Postmodern Revisionings of the Political. New York, N. Y.: Routledge. （二）期刊論文 Adams, G. B. (1992). Enthralled with Modernity: The Historical Context of Knowledge. Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 4, 363-373. Barth, T. J. (1992). The Public Interest and Administrative Discretion. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 22, No. 4, 289-300. Blanchard, L. A., & Wong, W. (1998). Market-Based Reforms in Government: Toward a Social Subcontract? Administration & Society,Vol. 30, No. 5, 483- 512. Brewer, L. (1996). In the Public Interest: Symposium Introduction. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 97-99. Bruce, W. M. (2000). Public Administrator Attitudes about Spirituality: An Exploratory Study. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 30, No. 4, 460-472. Brysk, A. (1995). Hearts and Minds: Bringing Symbolic. Polity, Vol. 27, No. 4, 559- 585. Burrell, G. (1994). Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis 4: the Contribution of Jurgen Habermas. Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1-45. Carr, A. (1996). Putative Problematic Agency in a Postmodern World: Is it Implication in the Text—Can it be Explicit in Organization Analysis? In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 79-86. 周寄中譯 I. Lakatos & A. Musgrav著 Catron, B. L. (1996). Sustainability and Intergenerational Equity: An Expanded Stewardship Role for Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2-12. Chia, R. (1995). From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis. Organization Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 579-604. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. G. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No., 1-25. Crosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, 170-178. DeLeon, L. & Denhardt, R. B. (2000). The Political Theory of Reinvention. Public Administration Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 89-97. Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, Vol. 60, No. 6, 549-559. Farmer, D. J. (1996). The Postmodern Turn and the Socratic Gadfly. In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 128-133. Fox, C. J. (1993). Alternatives to Orthodoxy: Constitutionalism, Communitarianism, and Discourse. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 52-70. ——— (1996). Reinventing Government as Postmodern Symbolic Politics. Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 256-262. Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1993). Public Administration: A Short Treatise on Self- Referential Epiphenomena. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1- 17. 1993 《批判與知識的增長》，台北：桂冠圖書。 ——— (1996). What do We Mean When Say “Real” in Public Affairs: The Modern/Postmodern Distinction. In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 101-108. Frederickson, H. G. (1989). Minnowbrook II: Changing Epochs of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 95-100. ——— (1990). Public Administration and Social Equity. Public Administration Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, 228-237. ——— (1996). Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration. Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 263-270. Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, 331-343. Green, R. T., & Zinke, R. C. (1993). The Rhetorical Way of Knowing and Public Administration. Administration & Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, 317-334. Hassard, J. (1994). Postmodern Organizational Analysis: Toward a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, 303-324. Hoksbergen, R. (1994). Postmodernism and Institutionalism: Toward a Resolution of the Debate on Relativism. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 28, No. 3, 679-713. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, Vol. 69, No. 1, 3-19. Hummel, R. P. (1989). I`d Like to Be Ethical, but They Won`t Let Me. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 12, No. 6, 855-866. 尚新建、杜麗燕譯 J. Schmidt著 ——— (1990). Bureaucracy Policy: Toward Public Discourse on Organizing Public Administration. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, 907. ——— (1990). Managers And The Crisis Of Work In The Public Service. Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, 44-54. ——— (1991). Stories Managers Tell: Why They Are as Valid as Science. Public Administration Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, 31-41. ——— (1993). A Call for a Philosophy of Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 52-54. ——— (1996). Ideocracy: the Culture Uses of Modern Post-ism in a Late Capital Economy. In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 87-96. Immergut, E. M. (1998). The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics & Society, Vol. 26, No. 1, 5-34. Ingraham, P. W., & Ban C. (1988). Politics and Merit: Can They Meet in a Public Service Model. Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 8, No. 2, 7-19. Jeffcutt, P. (1993). From Interpretation to Representation in Organizational Analysis: Postmodernism, Ethnography and Organizational Symbolism. Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, 241-274. Jegstrup, E. (1995). A questioning of justice: Kierkegaard, the Postmodern Critique and Political Theory. Political Theory, Vol. 23, No. 3, 425-451. Jun S. J. (1993). What is Philosophy of Administration? Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 46-51. 1992 《梅洛龐蒂：現象學與結構主義之間》，台北：桂冠圖書。 Kelly, M. (1993). Policy Analysis in the Post-Positivist Era: Engaging Stakeholders in Evaluating the Economic Development Districts Program. Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 2, 135-142. Koelble, T. A. (1995). The New Instituionalism in Political Science and Sociology. Comparative Politics, No. 27, 231-245. Kravchuk, R. S. (1992). Liberalism and the Administrative State. Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 4, 374-379. Kreiner, K. (1992). The Postmodern Epoch of Organization Theory. International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 22, No. 2, 37-52. Long, N. E. (1990). Conceptual Note on the Public Interest for Public Administration and Policy Analysis. Administration & Society, Vol. 22, No. 2, 170-181. March, J. G., & Olsen J. P. (1984). (Eds.). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, No. 78, 738-749. Marshall, G. S., & White, O. F. (1990). The Blacksburg Manifesto and the Postmodern Debate: Public Administration in a Time without a Name. America Review of Public Administration. Vol. 20, No. 2, 61-76. Marshall, G. S., & Choudhury, E. (1997). Public Administration and the Public Interest: Re-presenting a Lost Concept. The American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 41, 119-131. May, A. M., & Sellers, J. R. (1998). Contemporary Philosophy of Science and Neoinstitutional Thought. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 22, No. 2, 397-405. McLennan, G. (1995). After Postmodernism-Back to Sociological Theory? Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, Vol. 29, No. 1, 117-132. 尚衡譯 M. Foucault著 McSwite, O. C. (1997a). Jacques Lacan and the Theory of the Human Subject: How Psychoanalysis Can Help Public Administration. The American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 41, 43-63. ——— (1997b). The Perils of Nostalgia in Present Crisis of Modernism. Human Relations. Vol. 50, No. 8, 957-966. ——— (1997c). Postmodernism and Public Administrations` Identity Crisis. Public Administration Review. Vol. 57, No. 2, 174-181. McSwite, O. C., & McSwain, C. J. (1998). Liberalism (Its Present and Future Discontents) and the Hope of Collaborative Pragmatism. Public Productivity & Management Review. Vol. 22, No. 2, 271-278. Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and Democracy: the Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy. Public Administration Review, Vol. 57, No. 3, 193-199. Mesaros, W., & Balfour, D. L. (1993). Hermeneutics, Scientific Realism, and Social Research: Toward a unifying Paradigm for Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 27-40. Miller, D. (1995). Citizenship and Pluralism. Political Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 432- 450. Moe, R. C. (1987). Exploring the Limits of Privatization. Public Administration Review, Vol. 47, 453-460. Morgan, D. (1993). Madonna’s Sex: Constitutional Stewardship or Administrative Fantasies? Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 37-51. Nelson, L. S., & Weschler, F. (1996). Community Sustainability as a Dimension of Administrative Ethics. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 13-26. 1992 《性意識史—第一卷︰導論》，台北：桂冠圖書。 Olsen, J. P. (2001). Garbage Cans, New Intitutionalism, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, Vol. 95, No. 1, 191-198. O’Neill, J. (1995). Polity, Economy, Neutrality. Political Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 414- 431. Ospina, S. (1996). Bringing Opportunity Back In: Organizational Inequality and the Study of Work Attitudes. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 27- 40. Parker, M. (1992). Post-Modern Organizations or Postmodern Organization Theory? Organization Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1-17. ——— (1995). Critique in the Name of What? Postmodernism and Critical Approaches to Organization. Organization Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 553-577. Rosenbloom, D. H. (1993a). Have an Administrative RX? Don’t Forget the Politics! Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 6, 503-507. ———(1993b). Prescriptive Public Administration Theory as a Product of Political Dominance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1-10. Russell, G. D. (1998). The limits of reinventing government. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 28, No. 4, 325-346. Rutgers, M. R. (1994). Can the Study of Public Administration Do without a Concept of the State? Reflections on the Work of Lorenz Von Stein. Administration & Society, Vol. 26, No. 3, 395-412. Schmidt, M, R. (1993). Grout: Alternative Kinds of Knowledge and why they are Ignored. Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 6, 525-530. 施能傑 Schultz, M. (1992). Postmodern Pictures of Culture: a Postmodern Reflection on the “Modern Notion” of Corporate Culture. International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 22, No. 2,15-35. Smith, J. D. (1995). Post-Modern Thought. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 46, No. 4, 550. Spicer, M. W. (1994). Public Administration and the Constitution: A Conflict in World-Views. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 24, No. 1, 85- 97. Stillman II, R. J. (1995). The Refounding Movement in American Public Administration: From “Rabid” Anti-Statism to “Mere” Anti-Statism in the 1990s. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 17, No. 1, 29-45. Vinzant, J. (1993). Strange Bedfellows: Public Administration, Neutral Competence and Strong Parties. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 11-24. White, J. D., & Adams, G. B. (1995). Reason and Postmodernity: the Historical and Social Context of Public Administration Research and Theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1-18. White, O. F., & McSwain, C. J. (1993). The Semiotic Way of Knowing and Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 18-35. White, O. F. (1998). The Ideology of Technocratic Empiricism and the Discourse Movement in Contemporary Public Administration: A Clarification. Administration & Society, Vol. 30, No. 4, 471-476. Wilson, J. Q. (1993). What Is Moral, and How Do We Know It? Commentary. Vol. 95, No. 6, 37-43. ——— (1994). Reinventing Public Administration. Political Science & Politics. Vol. 27, No. 4, 667-678. 1999 〈政府的績效管理改革〉，《公共管理論文精選Ⅰ》（R. T. Glembiewski、孫本初、江岷欽編），台北：元照出版，107-127頁。 ——— (1995). Capitalism and Morality. Public Interest. No. 121, 42-60. Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, No. 2. 胡建平譯 A. Arblaster著 1992 《民主制》，台北：桂冠圖書。徐崇溫 1994 《結構主義與後結構主義》，台北：結構群。孫本初、江岷欽、R. T. Glembiewski編 1999 《公共管理論文精選Ⅰ》，台北：元照出版。孫本初 1999 〈前言〉，《公共管理論文精選Ⅰ》（R. T. Glembiewski、孫本初、江岷欽編），台北：元照出版，3-32頁。唐小兵譯 F. Jameson著 1993 《後現代主義與文化理論》，台北：合志文化。陳菁雯、葉銘元、許文柏譯 D. Marsh & G. Stoker著 1998 《政治學方法論》，台北：韋伯文化。陳榮灼 1992 《現代與後現代之間》，台北：時報文化。陳學明 1991 《馬孤哲的新馬克思主義》，台北：森大圖書。結構群編譯 P. Feyeraband著 1990 《自由社會中的科學》，台北：結構群。許立一、許立倫、夏道維、辜柏宏譯 W. Bergquist著 2000 《後現代組織》，台北：地景出版。許立一、許立倫、夏道維、辜柏宏譯 R. D. Stacey著 2000 《無常管理》，台北：地景公司。許立一、許立倫、夏道維、辜柏宏譯 S. Crook, J. Pakulski, & M. Waters著 2001 《鉅觀變局》，台北：地景公司。黃訓慶譯 R. Appignanasi & C. Garratt著 1996 《後現代主義》，台北：立緒文化。彭文賢 1986 《組織原理》，台北：三民書局。逯扶東 1991 《西洋政治思想史》，台北：自印。程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥譯 T. Kuhn著 1989 《科學革命的結構》，台北：遠流出版。葉啟政 2000 《進出「結構—行動」的困境》，台北：三民書局。葉啟政編 1991 《當代西方思想先河》，台北：正中書局。葉維廉 1992 《解讀現代•後現代︰生活空間與文化空間的思索》，台北︰東大出版。張巨清、吳寅華 1994 《邏輯與歷史︰現代科學方法論的嬗變》，台北：淑馨出版。楊大春 1995 《傅柯》，台北：生智出版。楊麗君、王嘉源譯 J. K. Galbraith著 1992 《自滿年代》，台北：時報出版。趙一凡、蒲隆、任曉晉譯 D. Bell著 1989 《資本主義的文化矛盾》，台北：桂冠圖書。趙敦華
描述	博士國立政治大學公共行政研究所 86256502 90
資料來源	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000004
資料類型	thesis

dc.contributor.advisor	林鍾沂<br>吳秀光	zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor	Chung-Yi Lin<br>Samuel S. Wu	en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors)	許立一	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors)	Li-Yi Hsu	en_US
dc.creator (作者)	許立一	zh_TW
dc.creator (作者)	Li-Yi Hsu	en_US
dc.date (日期)	2001	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	18-Sep-2009 17:02:05 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.available	18-Sep-2009 17:02:05 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間)	18-Sep-2009 17:02:05 (UTC+8)	-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers)	B2002000004	en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI)	https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36072	-
dc.description (描述)	博士	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	國立政治大學	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	公共行政研究所	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	86256502	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	90	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	公共行政在治理過程（process of governance）中應該居於何種地位與扮演什麼角色？其是否完全與政治無關，而且不負任何社會公義之價值議題的倡導責任？它應該如同市場取向的行政學者所言——追求小政府（minimal government），還是應該竭盡所能地回應社會的需求？公共行政人員應該著重專業技術，還是倫理思考？一九八○年代初期，六位美國維吉尼亞多元理工學院暨州立大學（Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University）的學者，有感於當時的行政學術之發展似乎無法釐清前述的課題，而新公共行政（New Public Administration）的主張並未能在實務上發揮作用，又鑑於當時一股貶責官僚（bureaucracy bashing）之風盛行。是以，他（她）們撰寫了一篇名為〈公共行政與治理過程：轉變政治對話〉（Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the Political Dialogue）的文章。因為維吉尼亞州立大學的所在地名為黑堡，故該文亦被學者簡稱為黑堡宣言（Blacksburg Manifesto）。黑堡宣言試圖針對前述課題，提出一些規範性的主張，俾以解決當代公共行政所遭遇的學術與實務的雙重困境。該宣言認為重建公共行政在治理過程中的正當性，乃是化解危機的核心。本論文研究的範圍不限於黑堡宣言一文，而是該宣言首席撰寫者Gary L. Wamsley所稱之黑堡觀點（Blacksburg Perspective）。所謂黑堡觀點，乃是以黑堡宣言為主軸，所發展出來的一系列的論述（discourse）。換言之，就是在黑堡宣言提出重建公共行政（refounding public administration）之主張後，陸續衍生的一些相關研究以及其中所提出的觀念。本論文希望探究：黑堡觀點針對上述課題所提供的論述為何？進而藉由認識論（epistemology）的分析，瞭解它立於何種哲學基礎之上，俾以達成所宣稱的境界？同時，也希望能夠檢視黑堡觀點本身的限制所在，提供後續相關研究的思考線索。最後，作者更嘗試提出一些補充性的見解，希望能在學術上有所貢獻。基於上述的研究動機和目的，本論文的各章的鋪陳內容如下：第一章緒論，說明本論文的研究動機與目的、基本概念界定、研究主題以及方法；第二章黑堡觀點的內涵，將探討黑堡觀點在美國行政學術中的定位及其思想淵源，並還原黑堡宣言一文的重要主張，進而以黑堡觀點反思傳統的行政理論和新公共管理；第三章黑堡觀點的認識論之分析，則分別探討其所蘊含的結構主義與後結構主義之色彩，進而提出前述兩種思維是否能夠共存的見解；第四章民主行政的實踐，則是根據第二、三章的論述為基礎，進一步耙梳黑堡觀點之下的民主行政之內涵，包括公共行政參與治理的正當性、公共利益、公共對話、公民意識、公共行政人員等課題；第五章結論，以前述的民主行政之實踐意涵，歸納黑堡點的特色及其在公共行政理念上的影響，並指出其理論的內在弔詭。然後，對照我國行政實務，試舉例說明黑堡觀點的啟發。最後，指出本論文的研究限制以及作者對後續研究的建議。本論文的特色在於，超越相關的研究，針對黑堡觀點的認識論進行分析，此實為一種開創性的研究。抑有進者，作者認為本論文應能夠產生如后的貢獻：第一，提供不同於時下流行之管理途徑的觀點，刺激學界思索其它的研究途徑；第二，為後續有興趣於此一途徑的研究者，奠定初步的基礎，至少本論文在理論耙梳和認識論的分析方面，應該有所助益；第三，作者提出對於黑堡觀點之內在弔詭的反省，以及從實務的角度思考黑堡觀點的實踐意涵，希望能夠做為後續研究的線索和方向。第一章緒論••••••••••••••••••••••••1 第一節研究動機•••••••••••••••••1 第二節研究目的•••••••••••••••••3 第三節基本概念的界定••••••••••••••4 第四節研究主題與方法••••••••••••••16 第二章黑堡觀點的內涵••••••••••••••••••23 第一節黑堡觀點的興起及其與新公共行政的關係•••25 第二節黑堡宣言的主張••••••••••••••44 第三節以黑堡觀點反思傳統的行政理論•••••••61 第四節以黑堡觀點反思新公共管理•••••••••83 第三章黑堡觀點的認識論之分析••••••••••••117 第一節黑堡觀點的結構主義色彩••••••••••118 第二節黑堡觀點的後結構主義傾向•••••••••151 第三節結構主義與後結構主義的共容性之探討••••187 第四章黑堡觀點之民主行政的實踐••••••••••••197 第一節公共行政參與治理的正當性•••••••••198 第二節公共利益•••••••••••••••••218 第三節公共對話•••••••••••••••••251 第四節公民意識•••••••••••••••••275 第五節公共行政人員•••••••••••••••293 第五章結論•••••••••••••••••••••••317 第一節黑堡觀點的特色及其影響••••••••••317 第二節黑堡觀點的內在弔詭與限制•••••••••326 第三節黑堡觀點對我國行政實務的啟發•••••••334 第四節本論文的研究限制與對後續研究的建議••••355 參考資料••••••••••••••••••••••••••361	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	This thesis concerned about the legitimacy of public administration in the process of governance. Since administrative management and behavioralism rise the efficiency became the subject matter in public administration. However, Blacksburg Manifesto reminds us the public administration can not be equal with management and efficiency are not public administration`s only value. So, the author of this thesis is interested in Blacksburg Perspective`s refounding public administration. This study includes Blacksburg Perspective`s discourse about public administration and these discourses` epistemology. Firstly, the author summarizes Blacksburg Manifesto and induces characters of the Manifesto. Secondly, he criticizes traditional public management and new public management bases on the Blacksburg Perspective. Thirdly, to analyze the epistemology of Blacksburg Perspective includes structuralism and poststructuralism. Fourthly, this study introduces the implications of democratic public administration of Blacksburg Perspective. Fifthly, the author bases on Blacksburg Perspective rethink administrative practice in his country. Finally, to examine theoretical paradoxes of Blacksburg Perspective. The Author hopes this study is helpful for students are interested in this relative field about democratic public administration and by this thesis we can think about how to refound the legitimacy of public administration in process of governance.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	-
dc.source.uri (資料來源)	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000004	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	黑堡宣言	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	黑堡觀點	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	民主行政	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	後實證主義	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	結構主義	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	後結構主義	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	現代主義	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	後現代主義	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	blacksburg manifesto	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	blacksburg perspective	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	democratic administration	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	postpositivism	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	structuralism	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	poststructuralism	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	modernism	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	postmodernism	en_US
dc.title (題名)	公共行政的黑堡觀點及其認識論之研究	zh_TW
dc.title (題名)	The Study in Blacksburg Perspective and It`s Epistemology of Public Administration	en_US
dc.type (資料類型)	thesis	en
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	一、中文部分	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	（一）專書及學位論文	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	《牛津大辭典》	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1989 台北：旺文社。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	王又如譯 R. Tarnas著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995 《西方心靈的激情》，台北：正中書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	王寧、顧棟華、黃桂友、趙白生譯 D. Fokkema & H. Bertens編	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《走向後現代主義》，台北：淑馨出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	毛榮富	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 〈傅柯〉，《當代西方思想先河》（葉啟政編），台北：正中書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	江岷欽	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1988 《勞斯的正義論解說》，台北：遠流出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	蔡源煌	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《從浪漫主義到後現代主義︰文學術語的新詮》，台北︰雅典出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	蔡錚雲	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995 《從現象學到後現代》，台北：自印。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	趙一凡、蒲隆、任曉晉譯 D. Bell著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1989 《資本主義的文化矛盾》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	歐崇亞	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1997 《新制度主義與公共組織分析》，東海大學公共行政系碩士學位論文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	鄒理民譯 P. L. Berger & T. Luckmann著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《組織分析》，台北：五南圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《社會實體的建構》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	談谷錚譯 J. M. Barbalet著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《公民資格》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	廖仁義譯	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 E. Pivcevic著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	《胡賽爾與現象學》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 A. Giddens著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	《批判的社會學導論》，台北：唐山出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉北成譯	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 J. Galbraith著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	江岷欽、林鍾沂	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	《權力的剖析》，台北：時報文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 J. Habermas著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	《合法化危機》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉北成、楊遠櫻譯 M. Foucault著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992a 《規訓與懲罰：監獄的誕生》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992b 《瘋顛與文明》（劉北成、楊遠櫻譯），台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉軍寧譯 S. P. Huntington著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 《第三波：二十世紀末的民主化浪潮》，台北：五南圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉象愚譯 I. Hassan著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《後現代的轉向︰後現代理論與文化論文集》，台北：時報文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995 《公共組織理論》，台北：國立空大。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉絮凱譯 M. Foucault著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 《臨床醫學的誕生》，台北：時報文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉繼譯 H. Marcuse著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1990 《單向度的人︰發達工業社會意識型態研究》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	鄭祥福	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995 《李歐塔》，台北：生智出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	盧嵐蘭譯 A. Schutz	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《社會世界的現象學》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	顧忠華譯 M. Weber著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《社會學的基本概念》，台北：遠流出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	朱元鴻、馬彥彬、方孝鼎、張崇熙、李世明譯 S. Best & D. Kellner著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	顧忠華	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 《韋伯學說新探》，台北：唐山出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	顧淑馨譯 P. Kennedy著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《創世紀》，台北：天下文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	（二）期刊與研討會論文	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	沈清松	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 〈從現代到後現代〉，《哲學雜誌》，第4期，4-25頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	余致力	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000 〈論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色：黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示〉，《公共行政學報》（國立政治大學公共行政系），第4期，1-2頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	汪明輝	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 《後現代理論：批判的質疑》，台北：巨流圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	網頁〈原住民運動空間性〉，刊載於http://www.geo.ntnu.edu.tw/faculty/tibu/ 原住民運動空間性摘要.htm。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李謁政	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈建構社區美學：邁向台灣集體記憶之空間美學〉，文建會主辦「1999 社區美學研討會」，地點：台北。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	吳瓊恩、張世杰	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995 〈公共行政與人文主義的回顧及反省〉，《中國行政評論》，第4卷，第2期，37-68頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	林春明	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 〈後結構主義與差異哲學〉，《哲學雜誌》，第4期，42-49頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	林鍾沂、許立一	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1998 〈我國政府再造推動計畫的政策弔詭：SWOT的分析架構〉，國立台灣大學政治系主辦「行政現代化：兩岸學術研討會」宣讀論文。地點：台北台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	林鍾沂、許立一	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	沈清松編	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈後現代主義之下的公共行政〉，世新大學行政管理系主辦「民主行政與政府再造學術研討會」宣讀之論文，地點：台北世新大學。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	唐力權	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 〈權力、意志與詮釋：尼采的透視主義與後現代思想〉，《哲學雜誌》，，第4期，26-41頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳金貴	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1990 〈從兩次明瑙布魯克會議看美國公共行政學的發展〉，《美國月刊》，第 4卷第9期，110-117頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	許立一	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995a 〈文官行政中立：困境的檢視與概念的新詮〉，《行政學報》，第26期， 31-48頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995b 〈從公共選擇途徑論全民健保保費政策之制定〉，《中國行政評論》，第 5卷，第1期，131-152頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1997a 〈現代主義與後現代主義的辯證：功能論之認識論的反思〉，《公共行政學報》（國立政治大學公共行政系），第1期，175-197頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1997b 〈後現代主義對公共行政之意涵：理論意象的評估〉，《行政學報》（國立中興大學公共行政系出版），第28期，149-199頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1990 《時代心靈之鑰》，台北：正中書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1998 〈後現代主義對組織分析之意涵〉，《行政學報》（國立中興大學公共行政系出版），第29期，315-343頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈官僚制的後現代解構〉，國立政治大學主辦「國立政治大學八十七學年度研究生研究成發表會」宣讀論文。地點：台北政治大學。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈官僚制之理念的探討：組織的解構與重構〉，《公共行政學報》（國立政治大學公共行政系出版），第3期，301-316頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈公共行政的後現代危機及其解決：兼論行政改革之ReGo模型的限制〉，中民國公共行政學會主辦「海峽兩岸行政管理學術研討會」宣讀論文，地點：上海上海大學行政管理系。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈後現代主義與公共行政：理論與實務的反思〉，《行政暨政策學報》（國立中興大學公共行政系出版），第1期，219-266頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	彭文賢	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈邁向後現代組織理論？〉，《中國行政評論》，第8卷，第4期，63-82	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	蔡錚雲	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 〈後現代的哲學論述是如何可能的？德里達對胡塞爾現象學的解構〉，《哲學雜誌》，第4期，50-67頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	呂育誠、陳恆鈞、陳菁雯、劉淑惠譯 D. H. Rosenbloom著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	（三）報紙	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	中時晚報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/22 「去年５２０後簡任以上高級文官異動狀況表」（圖表統計），2 版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/05/17 「挑戰死神陳老師等嘸肝剩二天生命」，6版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	中國時報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/2/26 「官僚機制港星澳效率亞洲之冠」，2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/22 「撤換事務官張揆不否認」，3版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/23 「在野黨：政務官無能才是問題」，4版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/5/22 「陳希聖案衛署同意專案特准接受五親等捐肝」，6版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/5/24 「器官捐贈與移植的省思」，15版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000 《公共行政學》，台北：學富文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	台灣日報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/13 「軍公教暫緩調薪具有減緩經濟危機的指標意義」，2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/31 「舊官僚包圍民進黨無外交」，4版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	民生報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/14 「軍公教共體時艱？」，2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/23 「文官體系立院質詢焦點」，A4版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/5/19 「誰殺了大學講師」，A9版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/5/19 「台大著手三親等外活體配對」，A9版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	民眾日報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/13 「共體時艱」，3版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	仰哲出版社西洋哲學編譯小組譯 R. Descartes等著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/15 「頭家日子難過公僕何妨共體時艱」，2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	自由時報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/15 「縮編緩加薪救競爭力」，15版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/23 「林豐正：勿因顏色不同就亂換人」，4版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李慶雄	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/22 「當舊官僚成了新政府眼中的廢物冗員」，聯合報，15版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	林端	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/27 「無能的新官僚更可怕」，聯合晚報，2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	金恆煒	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/14 「緩薪案民進黨提出有理」，台灣日報，4版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1982 《西歐理性論哲學資料選輯》，台北：仰哲出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	勁報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/12 「DPP時機、動機很可議」，N2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	黃一峰	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/5/15 「學者：文官消極造成寂靜危機」（專訪），聯合晚報，4版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	黃昭順	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/23 「全是文官體系的錯嗎」，中央日報，19版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	黃爾璇	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/4 「政院切莫淪為舊官僚的傀儡」，台灣日報，3版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	曾家倫	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/10/24 「失業率VS.公務員加薪」，民眾日報，3版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	仰哲出版社西洋哲學編譯小組譯 F. Bacon等著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	經濟日報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/13 「如意算盤未必如意」，4版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	衛民	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/10/25 「公僕難為別再讓公僕難過」，聯合報，15版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	聯合報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/5/18 「陳希聖罹猛爆性肝炎輔大講師等肝救命」，6版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/5/19 「礙於法律難換肝立委為病人請命盼先以行政命令放寬捐肝者條件」，6版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	聯合晚報	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/12 「要刮別人薪水先刮自己的」，3版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000/12/13 「公務員薪事」（圖表統計），2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1984 《英國經驗論哲學資料選輯》，台北：仰哲出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001/3/22 「周伯倫：行政院長都換人難道文官不能動」，2版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	（四）古籍	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	毛文銓（清雍正四年正月初四日）	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	網頁「奏報請撫臺灣生番摺」，刊載於http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~pingpu/library/	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	fulltext/npmdatabase/yun021.htm。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	吳承恩（明代）	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	網頁《西遊記》，刊載於http://www.angelibrary.com/oldies/xiyouji/	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	xiyouji.html。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	佛教經典	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	網頁《大乘遍照光明藏無字法門經》，刊載於http://www.a-mita.com.tw/	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李永熾譯 F. Fukuyama著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	libe/hung_a_l_70.html。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	網頁《達摩血脈論》，刊載於http://mail.ht.net.tw/~yoga/d6.htm。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	網頁《達摩無心論》，刊載於http://mail.ht.net.tw/~yoga/d7.htm。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	二、英文部分	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	（一）專書	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bailey, M. T., & Mayer R. T. (1992). (Eds.). Public Management in an Interconnected World: Essays in the Minnowbrook Tradition. New York: Greenwood Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bailey, M. T. (1992). Beyond Rationality: Decisionmaking in a Interconnected World. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Eds.). Public Management in an Interconnected World (33-52). New York: Greenwood Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Baradat, L. P. (1991). Political Ideologies. (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Barbalet, J. M. (1988). Citizenship. Minneapolis, Minn.: The University of Minnesota Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Barber, B. (1986). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, C. A.: University of California Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《歷史之終結與最後一人》，台北：時報文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Barnard, C. I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Barth, T. J. (1996). Administering in the Public Interest: the Facilitative Role for PublicAdministrators. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (168-197). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Baum, H. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (307). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Baynes, K. (1992). The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, and Habermas. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Behn, R. D. (1991). Leadership Counts: Lessons for Public Managers from the Massachusetts Welfare, Training, and Employment Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart. Berkeley and Los Angeles, C. A. : University of California Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1992). The Good Society. New York, N. Y.: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bergquist W. (1993). The Postmodern Organization: Mastering the Art of Irreversible Change. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bernstein, R. J. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. London, U. K.: Metheu & Co. Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李茂興、李慕華、林宗鴻譯 S. P. Robbins著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1991). The New Constellation: the Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to Social Enquiry. Oxford, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bottomore, T. B., & Mulkay, M. J. (Eds.). (1984). The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London, U. K.: George Allen & Unwin Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Botwinick, A. (1993). Postmodernism and Democratic Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bozeman, B. (1993). (Ed.). Public Management: the State of the Art. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1993). Introduction: Two Concepts of Public Management. In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public Management: the State of the Art (1-5). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bradley, D. R. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (307). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Hants, England: Gower Publishing Company Limited.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Callinicos, A. T. (1989). Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《組織行為》，台北：揚智文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Canetti, E. (1963). Crowds and Powers. New York, N. Y.: Viking.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Catron, B. L. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (308). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Chandler, R. C. (Ed.). (1987). A Centennial History of the American Administrative State. New York: Macmillan.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Clay, J. A. (1996). Public-Institutional Processes and Democratic Governance. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (92-113). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Clegg, S. R. (1994). Max Weber and contemporary sociology of organizations. In L. J. Ray & M. Reed (Eds.), Organizing Modernity (pp. 46-80). New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Cohen, I. J. (1989). Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. London, U. K.: Macmillan Education Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Cooke, D. O. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (310). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Crook, S., Pakulski, J., & Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李連江	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dallmayr, F. R. (1981). Beyond Dogma and Despair: Toward a Critical Phenomenology of Politics. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1987). Critical Encounters: Between Philosophy and Politics. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Davis, G., & Weller, P. (1996). (Eds.). New Ideas, Better Government. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Denhardt, R. B. (1993). Theories of Public Organization. C. A.: Wadsworth, Publishing Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dennard, L. F. (1990). The Maturation of Public Administration: the Search for a Democratic Identity. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (293-326). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dimock, M. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (308). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dudley, L. (1996). Fencing in the Inherently Governmental Debate. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (68-91). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dunleavy, P., & O’Leary, B. (1987). Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. New York, N. Y.: The Macmillan Press Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《新保守主義》，台北：揚智出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding Public Policy (7th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Edge, H. L. (1994). A Constructive Postmodern Perspective on Self and Community: from Atomism to Holism. Lewiston, N. Y.: The Edwin Mellen Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The Elite Connection: Problems and Potential of Western Democracy. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Farmer, D. J. (1995). The Language of Public Administration: Bureaucracy, Modernity, and Postmodernity. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1998). (Ed.). Papers on the Art of Anti-Administration. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Fay, B. (1976). Social Theory and Political Practice. New York, N. Y.: Holmes & Meuer Publishers, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1987). Critical Social Science: Liberation and Its Limits. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Flathman, R. (1966). The Public Interest: An Essay Concerning the Normative Discourse of Politics. New York, N. Y.: Wiley.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	吳曲輝等譯 J. H. Turner著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Fox, C. J., & Miller H. T. (1995). Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publication, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Frederickson, H. G. (1997). The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Gaarder, J. (1995). Sophie’s World (P. Moller, Trans.). London, U. K.: Phoenix, Orion Books Ltd.. (Original work published 1991).	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Gane M., & Johnson, T. (1993). Foucault’s New Domains. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Garson, G. D., & Overman, E. S. (1983). Public Management Research in the United States. New York, N. Y.: Praeger Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Garston, N. (Ed.) (1993). Bureaucracy: Three Paradigms. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Garvey, G. (1993). Facing the Bureaucracy: Living and Dying in a Public Agency. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. London, U. K.: Hutchinson.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, C. A.: University of California Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, C. A.: University of California Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《社會學理論的結構》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford, C. A.: Stanford University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and Their Design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design (1-53). Cambridge, U. K.: The University of Cambridge Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Goodnow, F. J. (1992). Politics and Administration. Reprinted In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (25-28). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Goodsell, C. T. (1990). Public Administration and the Public Interest. In G. L. Wamsley et al. (Eds.), Refounding Public Administration (96-113). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1994). The Case for Bureaucracy: a Public Administration Polemic (3rd Ed.). Chatham, N. J.: Chatham House Publishers, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1998). Public Architecture as Social Anchor in the Postmodern Age. In D. J. Farmer (Ed.). Papers on the Art of Anti-Administration. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Gore, A. (1993). Report of the National Performance Review: Creating a Government that Works Better & Costs Less. Washington, DC: The White House.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Gray, J. (1993). Beyond the New Right. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Green, R. T., & Hubbell, L. (1996). On Governance and Reinventing Government. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (38-67). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	吳庚	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Grindle, M. S., & Thomas, J. W. (1991). Public Choices and Policy Change: the Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Gulick, L. (1992). Notes on the Theory of Organization. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (80-89). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Haber, H. F. (1994). Beyond Postmodern Politics: Lyotard, Rorty, Foucault. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.). (1995). The Enduring Challenges in Public Management: Surviving an Excelling in a Changing Word. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Ham, C., & Hill, M. (1997). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State (3rd Ed.). New York, N. Y.: Harvester Wheatsheaf Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Harmon, M. M. (1981). Action Theory for Public Administration. New York, N. Y.: Longman Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Harmon, M. M., ＆ Mayer, R. T. (1986). Organization Theory for Public Administration. Boston: Little, Brown ＆ Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hassard, J. (1993). Postmodernism and Organization Analysis: An Overview. In J. Hassard, & M. Parker (Eds.), Postmodernism and Organizations (1-24). New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Heckscher, C., & Donnellon, A. (Eds.) (1994). The Post-Bureaucratic Organization. Newbury Park. C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Heller, A., & Feher, F. (1988). The Postmodern Political Condition. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎》，台北：聯經出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Henry, N. (1992). Public Administration and Public Affairs (5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hill, L. B. (1992). (Ed.). The State of Public Bureaucracy. New York, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hollinger, R. (1994). Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: a Thematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hood, C. (1998). The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hughes, O. E. (1998). Public Management and Administration (2nd Ed.). New York, N. Y.: St. Martin’s Press, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Ingraham, P. W., & Romzek, B. S. (1994). Issues Raised by Current Reform Efforts. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service (1-14). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Jameson, F. (1981). The Political Unconsciousness: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Jun, J. S. (1986). Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving. New York, N. Y.: Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kettl, D. F. (1993). Searching for Clues about Public Management: Slicing the Onion Different Ways. In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public Management: the State of the Art (55-68). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1994). Managing on the Frontiers of Knowledge: the Learning Organization. In P. W. Ingraham et al. (Co-authored). New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service (19-40). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	吳瓊恩	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kettl, D. F., & Milward, H. B. (1996). (Eds.). The State of Public Management. Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Lane, L. M. (1996). The Public Administration and the Problem of the Presidency. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (225-259). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Law, J. Organization, Narrative and Strategy. In J. Hassard, & M. Parker (Eds.), Toward a New Theory of Organizations (248-268). New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Linden, R. M. (1994). Seamless Government: Practical Guide to Re-engineering in Public Sector. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Little, J. H. (1996). Thinking Government: Bring Democratic Awareness to Public Administration. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (327-350). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Luke, J. S. (1992). Managing Interconnectedness: the New Challenge for Public Administration. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Ed.). Public Management in an Interconnected World. (13-32). New York: Greenwood Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Lynn, Jr., L. E. (1996). Public Management as Art, Science, and Profession. Chatham, N. J.: Chatham House Publishers, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Lyotard, Jean-Francois (1984). The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge. (G. Bennington, & B. Massouri, Trans.). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《行政學的範圍與方法》，台北：五南圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1988). The Differend: Phrase in Dispute. (G. Van Den Abbeele, Trans.). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Lyotard, Jean-Francois, & Thebaund, Jean-Loup (1985). Just Gaming. (W. Godzich, Trans.). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	March, J. G., & Olsen J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics. New York, N. Y.: Free Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Marini, F. (1971). (Ed.). Toward a New Public Administration: the Minnowbrook Perspective. New York, N. Y.: Chandler Publishing Co..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1971). The Minnowbrook Perspective and the Future of Public Administration Education. In F. Marini, (Ed.), Toward a New Public Administration: the Minnowbrook Perspective (346-367). New York, N. Y.: Chandler Publishing Co..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1992). Introduction. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Ed.). Public Management in an Interconnected World. (1-9). New York: Greenwood Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	May, T. (1995). The Moral Theory of Poststructuralism. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	McCollough T. E. (1991). The Moral Imagination and Public Life. Chatam, N. J.: Chatam House Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	McSwite, O. C. (1996). Postmodernism, Public Administration, and the Public Interest. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (198-224). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	McSwite, O. C. (1997d). Legitimacy in Public Administration: A Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1996 《行政學》，台北：三民書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1998). Stories from the “Real World”: Administering Anti-Administratively. In D. J. Farmer (Ed.). Papers on the Art of Anti-Administration. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (1997). Postmodernism, “Reality”, & Public Administration: A Discourse. Burke, Virginia: Chatelaine Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Milward, H. B. (1994). Implications of Contracting Out: New Roles for the Hollow State. In J. L. Perry. (Ed.), New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service (41-62). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Morgan, D. F. (1994). The Public Interest. In , T. L. Cooper (Ed.) Handbook of administrative ethics. New York, N. Y.: Marcel Dekker.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Morgan, G. (1986). Image of Organization. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1993). Imanginization: The Art of Creative Management. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1998). Images of Organization: the Executive Edition. Thousand, C. A.: Sage Publications.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Nietzsche, F. (1967). The Will to Power (W. Kaufman & R. J. Hollingdale Trans.). New York, N. Y.: Vintage Books.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Oldfield, A. (1990). Citizenship and Community: Civic Republicanism and Modern World. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001 《行政學》（二版），台北：三民書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	O’Nell, J. (1995). The Poverty of Postmodernism. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Ostrom, V. (1974). The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Palmer, D. D. (1999). Structuralism and Poststructuralism for Beginners. New York, N. Y.: Writers and Readers Publishing Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Parkin, J. (1994). Public Management: Technocracy, Democracy and Organizational Reform. Brookfield, Vermont: Avebury Ashgate Publishing Limited.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Perry, J. L. (1994). (Ed.). New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science: the New Instituionalism. New York, N. Y.: Pinter.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). Models of Governance for the 1990s. In D. F. Kettl, & H. B. Milward (Eds.), The State of Public Management (15-44). Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Peters, G., & Savoie, D. J. (1995). (Eds.). Governance in a Changing Environment. Montreal, Canada: Canadian Centre for Management Development.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	林鍾沂	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Pierre, J. (1995). The Markitization of the State: Citizens, Consumers, and the Emergence of the Public Market. In G. Peters, & D. J. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a Changing Environment (55-81). Montreal, Canada: Canadian Centre for Management Development.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Poster, M. (1989). Critical Theory and Poststructuralism: in Search of Context. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990). The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). (Eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organization Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Power, M. (1990). Modernism, postmodernism, and organization. In J. Hssard, & D. Pym (Eds.), The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations: Critical Issue and New Perspectives (109-136). New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Preston, N., Sampford, C., & Bois, C-A. (1998). Ethics and Political Practice: Perspectives on Legislative Ethics. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Price, D. K. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (309). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Reed, M. I. (1992). The Sociology of Organization. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《公共政策與批判理論》，台北：遠流出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1994). Max Weber and the Dilemmas of Modernity. In L. J. Ray, & M. Reed (Eds.), Organizing Modernity (158-197). New York, N. Y.: Harvester Wheatsheaf.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Reich, R. B. (Ed.). (1988). The Power of Public Ideas. Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rein, M. (1976). Social Science and Public Policy. New York: Penguin.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Reisman, D. (1990). Theory of Collective Action: Downs, Olson, and Hirsh. New York. N. Y.: St. Martin’s Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Open University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1996). Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. San Francisco, C. A.: Jossey- Bass Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rohr, J. A. (1986). To Run a Constitution: the Legitimacy of the Administrative State. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990). The Constitutional Case for public Administration. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (52-95). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rosenbloom, D. H. (1998). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector (4th Ed.). New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Co..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Sarup, M. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism (2nd Ed.). Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《公共事務的設計與執行》，台北：幼獅文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Schatzki, T. R. (1993). Theory at Bay: Foucault, Lyotard, and Politics of the Local. In J. P. Jones III, W. Natter, & T. R. Schatzki, (Eds.). Postmodern Contentions: Epochs, Politics, Space (39-64). New York, N. Y.: The Guilford Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Self, P. (2000). Rolling Back the Market: Economic Dogma and Political Choice. London, U. K.: Macmillan Press Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Seligman, A. B. (1992). The Idea of Civil Society. New York, N. Y.: The Free Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, N. Y.: Currency Doubleday.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Shafritz J. M., & Hyde A. C. (Eds.). (1992). Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Shafritz J. M., & Ott, J. S. (Eds.). (1996). Classics of Organization Theory (4th Ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace College publisher.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Shand, D. (1996). Are We Reinventing Government? In G. Davis & P. Weller (Eds.), New Ideas, Better Government (64-73). St. Leonard, Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Sherick, J. H. (1990). Appendix: Selected Responses to the Blacksburg Manifesto. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (307). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Sim, S. (1992). Beyond Aesthetics: Confrontations with Poststructuralism and Postmodernism. New York, N. Y.: Harvester Wheatsheaf.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 《政策分析的理論與實踐》，台北：瑞興圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization (4th Ed.). New York, N. Y.: The Free Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Simons, H. W., & Billing, M. (Eds.). (1994). After Postmodernism: Reconstructuring Ideology Critique. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Smart, B. (1993). Postmodernity. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Stever, J. A. (2000). The Path to Organizational Skepticism. Burke, V. A.: Chatelaine Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Stivers, C. M. (1990). Active Citizenship and Public Administration. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (246-273). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). Refusing to Get It Right: Citizenship, Difference and the Refounding Project. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (260-278). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Taylor, F. (1992). Scientific Management. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (29-32). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Tery, G. (1998). Solidarity and Difference: the Politics of Enlightenment in the Aftermath of Modernity. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Tong, R. (1986). Ethics in Public Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Turner, B. S. (Ed.). (1993). Citizenship and Social Theory. Newbury Park. C. A.: Sage Publications Ltd..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001 《行政學》，台北：三民書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Switzerland: Paul Haupt Berne.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Waldo, D. (Ed.). (1971). Public Administration in a Time of Turbulence. New York, N. Y.: Chandler Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wamsley, G. L., Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wamsley, G. L. (1990a). Preface. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (6-18). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990b). Introduction. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (19-29). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990c). The Agency Perspective: Public Administrators as Agential Leaders. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration. (19-29). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). A Public Philosophy and Ontological Disclosure as the Basis for Normatively Grounded Theorizing in Public Administration. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (351-401). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wamsley, G. L., Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the political Dialogue. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (31-51). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wamsley, G. L., & Wolf, J. F. (Eds.). (1996). Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges. Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). Introduction: Can a High-Modern Project Find Happiness in a Postmodern Era? In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (1-37). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	林鍾沂譯 H. A. Simon著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Weber, M. (1992). Bureaucracy. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classic of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (248-268). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Weinberg, L. (1996). Understanding Social Process: the Key to Democratic Governance. In G. L. Wamsley, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (279-292). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	White, J. D. (1991). From Modernity to Postmodernity: Two Views of Planning and Public Administration. Public Administration Review. Vol. 51, No. 6, 564-568.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1992). Knowledge Development and Use in Public Administration: Views from Postpositivism, Poststructuralism, and Postmodernism. In Bailey M. T., & Mayer R. T. (Eds.), Public Management in an Interconnected World (159-176). New York: Greenwood Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1999). Taking Language Seriously: the Narrative Foundations of Public Administration Research. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	White, O. F. (1990). Reframing the Authority/Participation Debate. In Gary L. Wamsley et al. (Co-authored), Refounding Public Administration (182-245). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	White, O. F., & McSwain, C. (1990). The Phoenix Project: Raising Public Administration from the Ashes of the Past. In H. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and Identities in Public Administration (23-59). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: the Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. London, U. K.: transaction Publishers.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wilson, W. (1992). The Study of Administration. Reprinted In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd Ed.) (11-24). Pacific Grove, C. A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wolf, J. F. (1996). Moving Beyond Prescriptions: Making Sense of Public Administration Action Contexts. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges (141-167). Thousand Oaks, C. A.: Sage Publications, Inc..	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1988 《人類事務的理性》，台北：森大圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Yeatman, A. (1994). Postmodern Revisionings of the Political. New York, N. Y.: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	（二）期刊論文	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Adams, G. B. (1992). Enthralled with Modernity: The Historical Context of Knowledge. Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 4, 363-373.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Barth, T. J. (1992). The Public Interest and Administrative Discretion. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 22, No. 4, 289-300.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Blanchard, L. A., & Wong, W. (1998). Market-Based Reforms in Government: Toward a Social Subcontract? Administration & Society,Vol. 30, No. 5, 483- 512.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Brewer, L. (1996). In the Public Interest: Symposium Introduction. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 97-99.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Bruce, W. M. (2000). Public Administrator Attitudes about Spirituality: An Exploratory Study. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 30, No. 4, 460-472.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Brysk, A. (1995). Hearts and Minds: Bringing Symbolic. Polity, Vol. 27, No. 4, 559- 585.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Burrell, G. (1994). Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis 4: the Contribution of Jurgen Habermas. Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1-45.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Carr, A. (1996). Putative Problematic Agency in a Postmodern World: Is it Implication in the Text—Can it be Explicit in Organization Analysis? In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 79-86.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	周寄中譯 I. Lakatos & A. Musgrav著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Catron, B. L. (1996). Sustainability and Intergenerational Equity: An Expanded Stewardship Role for Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2-12.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Chia, R. (1995). From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis. Organization Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 579-604.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. G. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No., 1-25.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Crosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, 170-178.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	DeLeon, L. & Denhardt, R. B. (2000). The Political Theory of Reinvention. Public Administration Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 89-97.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, Vol. 60, No. 6, 549-559.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Farmer, D. J. (1996). The Postmodern Turn and the Socratic Gadfly. In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 128-133.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Fox, C. J. (1993). Alternatives to Orthodoxy: Constitutionalism, Communitarianism, and Discourse. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 52-70.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). Reinventing Government as Postmodern Symbolic Politics. Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 256-262.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1993). Public Administration: A Short Treatise on Self- Referential Epiphenomena. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1- 17.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《批判與知識的增長》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). What do We Mean When Say “Real” in Public Affairs: The Modern/Postmodern Distinction. In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 101-108.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Frederickson, H. G. (1989). Minnowbrook II: Changing Epochs of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 95-100.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990). Public Administration and Social Equity. Public Administration Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, 228-237.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration. Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, 263-270.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, 331-343.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Green, R. T., & Zinke, R. C. (1993). The Rhetorical Way of Knowing and Public Administration. Administration & Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, 317-334.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hassard, J. (1994). Postmodern Organizational Analysis: Toward a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, 303-324.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hoksbergen, R. (1994). Postmodernism and Institutionalism: Toward a Resolution of the Debate on Relativism. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 28, No. 3, 679-713.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, Vol. 69, No. 1, 3-19.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hummel, R. P. (1989). I`d Like to Be Ethical, but They Won`t Let Me. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 12, No. 6, 855-866.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	尚新建、杜麗燕譯 J. Schmidt著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990). Bureaucracy Policy: Toward Public Discourse on Organizing Public Administration. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, 907.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1990). Managers And The Crisis Of Work In The Public Service. Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, 44-54.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1991). Stories Managers Tell: Why They Are as Valid as Science. Public Administration Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, 31-41.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1993). A Call for a Philosophy of Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 52-54.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1996). Ideocracy: the Culture Uses of Modern Post-ism in a Late Capital Economy. In C. J. Fox, & H. T. Miller, (Eds.), Modern/Postmodern Public Administration: A Discourse About What is Real (Symposium). Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 87-96.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Immergut, E. M. (1998). The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics & Society, Vol. 26, No. 1, 5-34.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Ingraham, P. W., & Ban C. (1988). Politics and Merit: Can They Meet in a Public Service Model. Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 8, No. 2, 7-19.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Jeffcutt, P. (1993). From Interpretation to Representation in Organizational Analysis: Postmodernism, Ethnography and Organizational Symbolism. Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, 241-274.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Jegstrup, E. (1995). A questioning of justice: Kierkegaard, the Postmodern Critique and Political Theory. Political Theory, Vol. 23, No. 3, 425-451.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Jun S. J. (1993). What is Philosophy of Administration? Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 46-51.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《梅洛龐蒂：現象學與結構主義之間》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kelly, M. (1993). Policy Analysis in the Post-Positivist Era: Engaging Stakeholders in Evaluating the Economic Development Districts Program. Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 2, 135-142.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Koelble, T. A. (1995). The New Instituionalism in Political Science and Sociology. Comparative Politics, No. 27, 231-245.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kravchuk, R. S. (1992). Liberalism and the Administrative State. Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 4, 374-379.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kreiner, K. (1992). The Postmodern Epoch of Organization Theory. International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 22, No. 2, 37-52.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Long, N. E. (1990). Conceptual Note on the Public Interest for Public Administration and Policy Analysis. Administration & Society, Vol. 22, No. 2, 170-181.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	March, J. G., & Olsen J. P. (1984). (Eds.). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, No. 78, 738-749.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Marshall, G. S., & White, O. F. (1990). The Blacksburg Manifesto and the Postmodern Debate: Public Administration in a Time without a Name. America Review of Public Administration. Vol. 20, No. 2, 61-76.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Marshall, G. S., & Choudhury, E. (1997). Public Administration and the Public Interest: Re-presenting a Lost Concept. The American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 41, 119-131.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	May, A. M., & Sellers, J. R. (1998). Contemporary Philosophy of Science and Neoinstitutional Thought. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 22, No. 2, 397-405.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	McLennan, G. (1995). After Postmodernism-Back to Sociological Theory? Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, Vol. 29, No. 1, 117-132.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	尚衡譯 M. Foucault著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	McSwite, O. C. (1997a). Jacques Lacan and the Theory of the Human Subject: How Psychoanalysis Can Help Public Administration. The American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 41, 43-63.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1997b). The Perils of Nostalgia in Present Crisis of Modernism. Human Relations. Vol. 50, No. 8, 957-966.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1997c). Postmodernism and Public Administrations` Identity Crisis. Public Administration Review. Vol. 57, No. 2, 174-181.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	McSwite, O. C., & McSwain, C. J. (1998). Liberalism (Its Present and Future Discontents) and the Hope of Collaborative Pragmatism. Public Productivity & Management Review. Vol. 22, No. 2, 271-278.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and Democracy: the Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy. Public Administration Review, Vol. 57, No. 3, 193-199.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Mesaros, W., & Balfour, D. L. (1993). Hermeneutics, Scientific Realism, and Social Research: Toward a unifying Paradigm for Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 27-40.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Miller, D. (1995). Citizenship and Pluralism. Political Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 432- 450.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Moe, R. C. (1987). Exploring the Limits of Privatization. Public Administration Review, Vol. 47, 453-460.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Morgan, D. (1993). Madonna’s Sex: Constitutional Stewardship or Administrative Fantasies? Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 37-51.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Nelson, L. S., & Weschler, F. (1996). Community Sustainability as a Dimension of Administrative Ethics. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 13-26.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《性意識史—第一卷︰導論》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Olsen, J. P. (2001). Garbage Cans, New Intitutionalism, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, Vol. 95, No. 1, 191-198.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	O’Neill, J. (1995). Polity, Economy, Neutrality. Political Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 414- 431.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Ospina, S. (1996). Bringing Opportunity Back In: Organizational Inequality and the Study of Work Attitudes. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 18, No. 1, 27- 40.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Parker, M. (1992). Post-Modern Organizations or Postmodern Organization Theory? Organization Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1-17.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1995). Critique in the Name of What? Postmodernism and Critical Approaches to Organization. Organization Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 553-577.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rosenbloom, D. H. (1993a). Have an Administrative RX? Don’t Forget the Politics! Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 6, 503-507.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	———(1993b). Prescriptive Public Administration Theory as a Product of Political Dominance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1-10.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Russell, G. D. (1998). The limits of reinventing government. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 28, No. 4, 325-346.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Rutgers, M. R. (1994). Can the Study of Public Administration Do without a Concept of the State? Reflections on the Work of Lorenz Von Stein. Administration & Society, Vol. 26, No. 3, 395-412.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Schmidt, M, R. (1993). Grout: Alternative Kinds of Knowledge and why they are Ignored. Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 6, 525-530.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	施能傑	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Schultz, M. (1992). Postmodern Pictures of Culture: a Postmodern Reflection on the “Modern Notion” of Corporate Culture. International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 22, No. 2,15-35.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Smith, J. D. (1995). Post-Modern Thought. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 46, No. 4, 550.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Spicer, M. W. (1994). Public Administration and the Constitution: A Conflict in World-Views. American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 24, No. 1, 85- 97.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Stillman II, R. J. (1995). The Refounding Movement in American Public Administration: From “Rabid” Anti-Statism to “Mere” Anti-Statism in the 1990s. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 17, No. 1, 29-45.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Vinzant, J. (1993). Strange Bedfellows: Public Administration, Neutral Competence and Strong Parties. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 11-24.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	White, J. D., & Adams, G. B. (1995). Reason and Postmodernity: the Historical and Social Context of Public Administration Research and Theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1-18.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	White, O. F., & McSwain, C. J. (1993). The Semiotic Way of Knowing and Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 18-35.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	White, O. F. (1998). The Ideology of Technocratic Empiricism and the Discourse Movement in Contemporary Public Administration: A Clarification. Administration & Society, Vol. 30, No. 4, 471-476.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wilson, J. Q. (1993). What Is Moral, and How Do We Know It? Commentary. Vol. 95, No. 6, 37-43.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1994). Reinventing Public Administration. Political Science & Politics. Vol. 27, No. 4, 667-678.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈政府的績效管理改革〉，《公共管理論文精選Ⅰ》（R. T. Glembiewski、孫本初、江岷欽編），台北：元照出版，107-127頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	——— (1995). Capitalism and Morality. Public Interest. No. 121, 42-60.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, No. 2.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	胡建平譯 A. Arblaster著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《民主制》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	徐崇溫	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 《結構主義與後結構主義》，台北：結構群。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	孫本初、江岷欽、R. T. Glembiewski編	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 《公共管理論文精選Ⅰ》，台北：元照出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	孫本初	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1999 〈前言〉，《公共管理論文精選Ⅰ》（R. T. Glembiewski、孫本初、江岷欽編），台北：元照出版，3-32頁。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	唐小兵譯 F. Jameson著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1993 《後現代主義與文化理論》，台北：合志文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳菁雯、葉銘元、許文柏譯 D. Marsh & G. Stoker著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1998 《政治學方法論》，台北：韋伯文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳榮灼	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《現代與後現代之間》，台北：時報文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳學明	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《馬孤哲的新馬克思主義》，台北：森大圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	結構群編譯 P. Feyeraband著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1990 《自由社會中的科學》，台北：結構群。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	許立一、許立倫、夏道維、辜柏宏譯 W. Bergquist著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000 《後現代組織》，台北：地景出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	許立一、許立倫、夏道維、辜柏宏譯 R. D. Stacey著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000 《無常管理》，台北：地景公司。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	許立一、許立倫、夏道維、辜柏宏譯 S. Crook, J. Pakulski, & M. Waters著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2001 《鉅觀變局》，台北：地景公司。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	黃訓慶譯 R. Appignanasi & C. Garratt著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1996 《後現代主義》，台北：立緒文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	彭文賢	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1986 《組織原理》，台北：三民書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	逯扶東	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《西洋政治思想史》，台北：自印。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥譯 T. Kuhn著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1989 《科學革命的結構》，台北：遠流出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	葉啟政	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	2000 《進出「結構—行動」的困境》，台北：三民書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	葉啟政編	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1991 《當代西方思想先河》，台北：正中書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	葉維廉	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《解讀現代•後現代︰生活空間與文化空間的思索》，台北︰東大出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張巨清、吳寅華	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1994 《邏輯與歷史︰現代科學方法論的嬗變》，台北：淑馨出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊大春	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1995 《傅柯》，台北：生智出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊麗君、王嘉源譯 J. K. Galbraith著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1992 《自滿年代》，台北：時報出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	趙一凡、蒲隆、任曉晉譯 D. Bell著	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	1989 《資本主義的文化矛盾》，台北：桂冠圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	趙敦華	zh_TW

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

Google Scholar^TM