Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 從命令與控制型到規制型國家:公共性概念的變遷
From Command and Control Model to Regulatory State: The Transformation of the Concept of Publicness
作者 朱玉
Zhu, Siena
貢獻者 江明修
Chiang, Min-Hsiu
朱玉
Zhu, Siena
關鍵詞 哈伯瑪斯
公共領域
公共性
福利國家
公私區分
Habermas
public sphere
publicness
welfare state
public/ private distinction
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 17:05:48 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文所要處理的問題為:「公共」的內容究竟為何?以及在福利國家的脈絡下公私之間如何互相滲透?本文採用Naomi Pfeffer與G. Majone的見解,將福利國家分為命令與控制型模式(command and control model)與規制型國家(regulatory state)。而這二種模式的差異可以由統治(government)和治理(governance)兩字得到說明,前者與命令與控制型相關,後者則與規制型相關。而所謂「治理」之概念,即一種國家權力向社會回歸的現象。本文以哈伯瑪斯《公共領域的結構轉型》為理論背景,探討現代國家職能由福利國家的興起與轉型之國家與社會關係與公私融合的過程。
The main purposes of this thesis are: (1) discuss the transformation of the relationship of state and society under the process of “‘societalization’ of the state” and “‘stateification’ of society” through the rise and transformation of the welfare state; (2) examine the theories of “publicness”, “public/private distinction”, and the phenomena of “public-private mix” to study the mutual relation between the public and the private; (3) review and criticize the selected public policy.
     The public/private distinction has declined under the welfare state nowadays. On the topic of welfare state, this thesis applies the opinions of Naomi Pfeffer and G. Majone that divide the welfare state into the command and control model and the regulatory state. The words “government” and “governance” could interpret the difference of these two kinds of patterns: the former is relative to the command and control model, while the latter is relative to the regulatory state. In addition, the conception of “governance” indicates the process of authority returns from the state to the society. On the topic of public/private relation, this thesis adopts the theories of Jürgen Habermas in his book: The Structure Transformation of Public Sphere, through his ideas of public sphere and its relation among the intimate sphere and the state to explore the relation between the state and society.
     In practice, this thesis takes the case of turning the national university into the corporation (juridical person) in Taiwan, and introduces to the theories discussed above: see the university as a public sphere and its reform as the transformation of welfare state.
"第一章 緒論……………………...…………………………………1
     第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1
     一、 研究動機……………………………………………….1
     二、 研究目的……………………………………………….3
     第二節 研究方法與限制……………………………………………3
     一、 研究方法……………………………………………….3
     二、 研究限制……………………………………………….3
     第三節 研究流程與章節安排………………………………………4
     第二章 福利國家的興起與轉型……………………...………...6
     第一節 福利國家的興起……………………………………………7
     一、 民族國家的發展…………………………………….…8
     二、 工業革命………………………………………….……9
     三、 凱因斯主義經濟學…………………………………...11
     第二節 福利國家的挑戰與轉型………………………………..…12
     一、 福利國家遭遇的挑戰……………………………...…13
     二、 向規制型國家的轉型…………………...……………54
     第三節 命令與控制型及規制型國家的比較…………………..…22
     一、 差異…………………………………………………...22
     二、 規制型模式中國家的角色…………………………...25
     第三章 公私區分與融合………………………….…………….27
     第一節 公私區分的原則………………………….………………27
     一、 公共性……………………………………………..….27
     二、 公私區分……………………………………………...29
     三、 公共領域……….……………………………………..30
     第二節 公共行政學的公共性理論………………………………..37
     一、 公共即國家、公民…………………………………….38
     二、 公共性即公共領域………………………………...…40
     三、 公共性是政府組織相對於企業組織之不同………...41
     第三節 法學上的公私法區分……………………………………..45
     一、 公法與私法二元論………………………………..….45
     二、 公法、私法與社會法三元論…………………………48
     第四節 公私區分的質疑與挑戰………………………………..…48
     一、 女性主義對於公私區分的質疑…………………..….49
     二、 企業參與公共對話…………………………………...50
     第五節 公私相互融合的趨勢……………………………………..52
     一、 「公法私法化」與「私法公法化」……………………...53
     二、 國家與市場的融合…………………………………….56
     三、 對傳統公私部門二分的衝擊………………………….63
     第四章 個案研究:我國國立大學行政法人化之規劃…….….69
     一、 大學作為公共領域(public sphere)…………………...69
     二、 國立大學行政法人化政策發展過程………………...70
     三、 我國推動行政法人制之特色………………………...71
     四、 質疑與批評………………………………………...…73
     第五章 結論……………………………………………………….76
     一、 公私區分與融合……………………………………77
     二、 福利國家轉型下國家干預功能的轉變…………….79
     三、 由國立大學行政法人化看公共領域的再封建化.…..81
     參考資料…………………………………….………………………...84
參考文獻 一、 專書
Anheier, Helmut K. & Jeremy Kendall eds., Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads, London; New York: Routledge, 2001.
Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago press, 1958.
Bagdikian, B., The Media Monopoly, Boston: Beacon Press, 2000, 6th ed.
Benn, Stanley I. and Gerald F. Gaus eds., Public and Private in Social Life, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.
Beveridge, William, Full Employment in a Free Society, London: New Statesman and Nation: Reynolds News, 1944.
Bock, Gisela and Susan James eds., Beyond Equality and Difference, London; New York: Routledge, 1992.
Bodin, Jean, Six Liveres de la République, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Burce, Maurice, The Coming of the Welfare State, London: Batsford, 1961.
Calhoun, C. ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992.
Cassirer, E., The Myth of the State, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1946.
孫善豪,〈導讀〉,Erhard Eppler著,孫善豪譯,《重返政治》,台北:聯經,民89。
晏坤譯,Jody Freeman著,〈私人團體、公共職能與新行政法〉,《北大法學評論》,卷5輯2,2004年。
袁曙宏譯,Alfredc Aman, Jr.著,〈面向新世紀的行政法〉,《行政法學研究》,期3,2000年。
馬道容,〈國立大學 將改制行政法人〉,《聯合報》,民91.11.14。
張世雄,〈Historical Origin of Welfare Debate in Post-keynesian Era: The Question of the Underclass and Citizen〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,卷1期2。
張成福,〈公共行政的管理主義:反思與批判〉,《中國人民大學學報》,期1,2001年。
教育部高教司,〈對國立大學改制為行政法人之說明〉,http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~sect/nctu-nthu/attach2.doc。
梅高文,〈公共行政「公正問題」與「能力問題」之研究──Habermas公共領域理論的觀點〉,政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,民84。
許立一,〈對我國建立行政法人制度的省思〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/092/IA-R-092-019.htm。
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, Public Men, Private Women: Women in Social and Political Thought, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1981.
陳學明譯,Jürgen Habermas著,《合法性危機》,台北:時報文化,民83。
許記泰,〈全球化下的歐盟社會福利制度與改革〉,佛光大學社會學研究所碩士論文,民92。
陳玟伶,〈哈伯瑪斯公共領域理念之研究〉,國立政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文,民92。
陳思編譯,Jean-Pierre Gaudin,〈現代的治理,昨天和今天:借重法國政府政策得以明確的幾點認識〉,俞可平編,《治理與善治》,北京:中國社會科學文獻,2000年。
陳祖洲,〈論英國新右派的福利觀〉,《南京大學學報》,期5,2000年。
陳祖為,〈資本主義社會中的良善生活是私人事務嗎?--對國家中立性的批判〉,「公私領域新探:東亞觀點與西方之比較」國際學術研討會論文。
陳學明,〈哈伯瑪斯的「晚期資本主義」論評析〉, Jürgen Habermas著,陳學明譯,《合法性危機》,台北:時報文化,民83。
陳龍森,〈公共領域與正當性危機:哈伯瑪斯的政治社會學〉,《東亞季刊》,卷29期2。
陳韻如,〈性、性別與公共領域〉,《傳播研究簡訊》,期13,民87.3。
湯志傑,〈藉公共領域建立自主性(上)〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,期10,民93.9。
程明修,〈制度的終結?--國立大學行政法人化之選擇〉,《法學講座》,期25,民93.01。
傅振焜譯,Peter Drucker著,《後資本主義社會》,台北:時報,民83。
Frederickson, H. G., The Spirit of Public Administration, San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997.
童世駿,〈公與私:劃界問題的歸屬問題〉,「公私領域新探:東亞觀點與西方之比較」國際學術研討會論文。
黃宗智,〈國家和社會之間的第三領域〉, Jürgen Habermas等著,甘陽主編,《社會主義—後冷戰時代的思索》,香港:牛津大學,1995年。
黃斌,〈關於西方福利國家理論與福利國家的幾點思考〉,《廣西社會科學》,期2,1996年。
黃競涓,〈性別、公民與市民社會〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-069.htm。
鄒川雄,〈正當性危機導讀〉, Jürgen Habermas著,陳學明譯,《合法性危機》,台北:時報文化,民83。
鄒勳元,〈經濟全球化下政府治理轉型與社會問題之研究—以OECD國家為例〉,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,民89。
廖俊松,〈民營化之外—歐美福利國家民營化的省思〉,《空大行政學報》,期9,民88.6。
廖炳惠,〈導讀:中西女性與公共領域〉,《台北縣立文化中心季刊》,期38,民82。
劉宗德,〈公法與私法的區別〉,《行政法爭議問題研究(上)》,民89.12。
詹中原,《民營化政策:公共行政理論與實務之分析》,台北:五南,民82。
劉新圓,〈何謂行政法人化〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/092/EC-B-092-013.htm。
Friedman, Milton, Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
潘萍、徐強勝,〈公私法關係論綱〉,《河北法學》,卷4期21,2003.7。
蔡茂寅,〈郵政利用關係的法律性質--以公法與私法二元論之檢討為中心〉,《月旦法學》,期15,民85.8。
鄭秉文,〈社會權利:現代福利國家模式的起源與詮釋〉,《山東大學學報》,期2,2005年。
鄭讚源,〈既競爭又合作、既依賴又自主:社會福利民營化過程中政府與民間非營利組織之角色與定位〉,《社區發展季刊》,期80,民86.12。
蕭鈺,〈「公共性」概念意涵之探索性研究〉,國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文,民91。
賴兩陽,〈經濟優先,社福更不能緩—全球化下社會政策的影響與出路〉,《社區發展季刊》,期102,民92。
謝沛學,〈全球治理:國際合作的新模式?〉,中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文,民91。
魏明德,〈公共領域、公共空間與政治版圖〉,《哲學與文化》,卷31期6,民93.6。
劉軍寧編,《自由與社群》,北京:三聯,1998年。
嚴錦堂,〈政府改造的另一取向--「行政法人」之探討〉,《人事月刊》,卷38期3,民93.03。
顧忠華,〈社會運動的「機構化」:兼論非營利組織在公民社會中的角色〉,張茂桂、鄭永年主編,《兩岸社會運動分析》,台北:新自然主義,民92。
Friedmann, John, Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1987.
顧淑馨,〈從學理來探討公共性和企業性問題─以日本的民營化為例─〉,《中國行政評論》,卷9期4,民89.9。
George, Victor, Ideology and Social Welfare, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.
Gies, D. L. et al., The Nonprofit Organization: Essential Readings, Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing, 1990.
Gutmann, Amy ed., Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1988.
Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.
Habermas, Jürgen, T. Burger & F. Lawrence trans., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, 1989.
Habermas, Jürgen, T. McCarthy trans., Legitimation Crisis, Boston: Beacon Press, 1975.
劉毓秀主編,《女性、國家、照顧工作》,台北:女書,民86。
Habermas, Jürgen, Thomas McCarthy trans., Communication and the Evolution of Society, Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.
Hayek, Friedrich A., The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
Herring, P., Public Administration and Public Interest, New York: Russell & Russell, 1967.
Hughes, Owen, Public Management & Administration, Macmillian Press, 2003, 3rd ed.
Kooiman, J. ed., Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, 1993.
Landes, Joan B. ed., Feminism, the Publics and the Private, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Levitt, T., The Third Sector: New Tactics for a Responsive Society, New York: Amacom, 1973.
McCarthy, Thomas, The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
Millett, Kate, Sexual Politics, Garden City: Doubleday, 1790.
Mishra, Ramesh, The Welfare State in Crisis: Social Thought and Social Change, Brighton, Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books, 1984.
蔡繼光等譯,Thomas L. Friedman著,《了解全球化》,台北:聯經,民89。
Moore, R. L., Selling God: American Religion in the Marketplace of Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Nicholsen, Shierry Weber ed. & trans, The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.
O’Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St. Martin`s Press, 1973.
Offe, Claus, Contradictions of the Welfare State, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1984, 1st ed.
Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1992.
Pateman, Carole, The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.
Peters, B. Guy, The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996.
Phillips, Anne ed., Feminism & Politics, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Powell, J. Enoch, Still to Decide, London: Batsford, 1972.
Rainey, Hal G., Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1991.
鄭武國譯,Anthony Giddens著,《第三條路:社會民主的更新》,台北:聯經,民88。
Rein, Martin, Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy : the Rise and Fall of Policy Regimes, Armonk, N.Y. : M.E. Sharpe,1987.
Robbins, Bruce ed., The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
Rosenbloom, David H. with the assistance of Deborah D. Goldman, Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector, New York: Random House, 1989, 2nd ed.
Rosenbloom, David H., Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics and Law in the Public Sector, , New York McGraw-Hill Inc, 1998, 4th ed.
Sabine, George H., A History of Political Theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961, 3rd ed.
Salamon, L. & Anheier, Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis, NY: Manchester University Press, 1997.
Sassoon, Anne Showstack ed., Women and the State: the Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private, London: Routledge, 1990.
Schiller, H., Culture, Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Schmitt, Carl, Der Begriff des Politischen, Berlin, 1987.
Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, George Schwab trans. Chicato & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
黎思復、黎廷弼譯,Thomas Hobbes,《利維坦》,北京:商務,1986年。
Self, P., Government by the Market, MacMillan Press, 1993.
Shafritz, Jay M. & Albert C. Hyde eds., Classics of Public Administration, Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1997, 4th ed.
Soley, L. C., Leasing the Ivory Tower: The Corporate Takeover of Academia, Boston: South End Press, 1995.
Sturdy, Steve ed., Medicine, Health and Public Sphere in Britian, 1600-2000, London: Routledge, 2002.
Waldo, Dwight, The Administrative State: a Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, New York: Ronald Press Co., 1948.
Walzer, M., “Introduction”, Toward GlobalCivil Society, Providence: Berghahn Books, 1995.
Weintraub, Jeff & Krishan Kumar, eds., Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Wistow, Gerald, Martin Knapp, Brain Hardy & Caroline Allen, Social Care in a Mixed Economy, Buckingham: Open University Press, 1994.
Woolf, Virginia, A Room of One’s Own, London: Penguin Books, 1945.
中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編,《列寧全集》,卷42,北京:人民,1987年。
聯合報編譯組譯,George Soros著,《全球資本主義危機:岌岌可危的開放社會》,台北:聯經,民87。
王學東譯,Franz-Xaver Kaufmann著,《社會福利國家面臨的挑戰》,北京:商務,2004年。
丘昌泰,《公共管理:理論與實務手冊》,台北:元照,民89。
古允文譯,Gosta Esping-Andersen著,《福利資本主義的三個世界》,台北:巨流,民90.9。
史際春、鄧峰著,《經濟法總論》,北京:法律出版社,1998年。
台灣行政法學會主編,《行政法爭議問題研究(上)》,台北:五南,民89.12。
甘陽主編,Jürgen Habermas等著,《社會主義—後冷戰時代的思索》,香港:牛津大學,1995年。
江明修,《第三部門:經營策略與社會參與》,台北:智勝,民89.4。
何兆武譯,Jean Jacques Rousseau著,《社會契約論》,北京:商務,1980年。
余佩珊譯,Peter Drucker著,《非營利機構的經營之道》,台北:遠流,民83.8。
吳庚,《行政法之理論與實用》,台北:三民,民89,版6。
謝宗林等譯,Friedrich A. Hayek著,《不要命的自負:社會主義的種種錯誤》,台北:遠流,民84。
吳庚大法官榮退論文集編輯委員會編,《公法學與政治理論─吳庚大法官榮退論文集》,台北:元照,民93。
吳錫堂、楊滿郁譯,Lawrence Friedman著,《法律與社會》,台北:巨流,民80。
呂健忠譯,Niccolo Machiavelli著,《李維羅馬史疏義》,台北:左岸文化,民92。
李英明,《新制度主義與社會資本》,台北:揚智,民94。
沈宗靈,《比較法研究》,北京:北京大學,1998年。
林萬億,《福利國家的形成與社會公平》,台北:台灣大學,民92。
林萬億,《福利國家—歷史比較分析》,台北:巨流,民83.10。
林鍾沂,《行政學》,台北:三民,民90。
俞可平編,《治理與善治》,北京:社會科學文獻,2000.9。
胡曉進等譯,Andrew Gamble著,《政治和命運》,南京:江蘇人民,2003.9。
Connolly, W. ed., Legitimacy and the State, New York: New York University Press, 1984.
夏道平譯,Friedrich A. Hayek著,《個人主義與經濟秩序》,台北:台灣銀行,民60,再版。
孫善豪譯,Erhard Eppler著,《重返政治》,台北:聯經,民89。
徐炳譯,William Wade著,《行政法》,北京:中國大百科全書,1997年。
殷海光譯,Friedrich A. Hayek著,《到奴役之路》,台北:文星,民54。
馬音等譯,John Keane著,《公共生活與晚期資本主義》,北京:社會科學文獻,1999.2。
馬清槐譯,Thomas Paine著,《人權論》,載《潘恩選集》,北京:商務,1982年。
張五常,《賣桔者言》,台北:遠流,民78。
張茂桂、鄭永年主編,《兩岸社會運動分析》,台北:新自然主義,民92。
曹玉文,《新佛洛伊德主義與馬克思主義》,台北:時報,民81。
曹衛東等譯,Jürgen Habermas著,《公共領域的結構轉型》,台北:聯經,民93。
藍科正、黃美齡譯,Milton Friedman著,《資本主義與自由》,台北:萬象,民82。
陳思賢,《西洋政治思想史—近代英國篇》,台北:五南,民87.8。
二、 期刊論文
Allison, Graham T., “Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?”, Jay M. Shafritz & Albert C. Hyde eds., Classics of Public Administration, Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1997, 4th ed.
Ambrozas, Diana, “The University as Public Sphere”, Canadian Journal of Communition, Vol.23, No.1, 1998.
Bellone, C. J. and G.. F. Goerl, “Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and Democracy”, Public Administration Review, Vol.52, No.2, 1992.
Benhabib, Seyla, “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas”, Landes ed., Feminism, the Publics and the Private, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Borchorst, Anette & Sim Birte, “Women and Advanced Welfare State – A New Kind of Patriarchal Power?”, Anne Showstack Sassoon ed., Women and the State: the Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private, London: Routledge, 1990.
Boyd, Josh, “Corporate Rhetoric Participates in Public Dialogue: A Solution to the Public/Private Conundrum”, The Southern Journal of Communication, vol.66, No.4, 2001.
Bozeman, Barry, “Exploring the Limits of Public and Private Sectors: Sector Boundaries as Maginot Line”, Public Administration Review, Vol.48, No.2, 1988.
Burlingame, Dwight F., “Corporate Philanthropy’s Future”, Helmut K. Anheier & Jeremy Kendall eds., Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads, London; New York: Routledge, 2001.
Cooper, Terry L., Handbook of Administrative Ethics, New York: M. Dekker, 1994.
Cennaro, Angela, “Memory beyond the Public Sphere: The Francoist Repression Remembered in Aragon”, History and Memory, Bloomington: IN : Indiana University Press, Fall 2002, Vol.14, Iss. 1/2.
Dietz, Mary G., “Citizenship with a Feminist Face: The Problem with Maternal Thinking,” Joan B. Landes ed., Feminism, the Publics and the Private, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Filer, “The Filer Commission Report”, D. L. Gies et al., The Nonprofit Organization: Essential Readings, Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing, 1990.
Fraser, Nancy, “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”, C. Calhoun ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, 1992.
Habermas, Jürgen, “The Idea of University: Learning Processes”, Shierry Weber Nicholsen ed. & trans, The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.
Hansmann, H. B., “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise”, Yale Law Journal, Vol.89, 1980.
Haque, M. Shamsul, “The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Govenance”, Public Administration Review, Vol.61, No.1, 2001.
Iversen and Wren, “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy”, World Politics, Vol.50 No.4, July 1998.
Kelly, R. M., “An Inclusive Democratic Polity, Representative Bureaucracies, and the New Public Management”, Public Administration Review, Vol.58, No.3, 1998.
Kooiman, J., “Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics and Diversity”, J. Kooiman ed., Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, 1993.
Denhardt, Robert B. & Janet V. Denhardt, The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering, Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 2003.
Lynn, L. E., “The New Public Management: How to Transform a Theme into a Legacy”, Public Administration Review, Vol.58, No.3, 1998.
Majone, Giandomenico, “From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance”, Journal of Public Policy, Vol.17, No.2.
Martin, A., “What Does Globalization Have to Do with the Erosion of Welfare State? Sorting out the Issues ”, Center for Social Policy Research Discussion Working Paper No.1, Bremen: University of Bremen, 1997.
McOmber, James B., “Clarifying the Public/Private Distinction by Eliminating It?: A Response to Josh Boyd”, The Southern Journal of Communication, Vol.66, No.4, 2001.
Newman, John Henry, “The Idea of a University”, http://www..fordham.edu/halsall/mod/newman/newman-university.html.
Okin, Susan Moller,“Gender, the Public, and the Private”, Anne Phillips ed., Feminism & Politics, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Pateman, Carole, “Equality, Difference, Subordination: The Politics of Motherhood and Women’s Citizenship,” Bock and James eds., Beyond Equality and Difference, London; New York: Routledge, 1992.
Pateman, Carole, “Feminist Criques of the Public/Private Dichotomy”, Benn & Gaus eds., Public and Private in Social Life, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.
Pateman, Carole, “The Patriachal Welfare State”, Amy Gutmann ed., Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1988.
Pfeffer, Naomi, “Fertility Counts: From Equity to Outcome”, Steve Sturdy ed., Medicine, Health and Public Sphere in Britian, 1600-2000, London: Routledge, 2002.
Denhardt, Robert B., Public Administration: An Action Orientation, Pacific Grove, Cal: Brooks/Cole, 1991.
Ranson, Stewart and John Stewart, “Citizenship and Government: The Challenge for Management in the Public Domain,” Political Studies, Vol.37 No.1, 1989.
Rhodes, R. A. W., “The New Governance: Governing without Government”, Political Studies, No.44, 1996.
Robbins, Bruce, “The Public as Phantom”, Bruce Robbins ed., The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
Salamon, Lester, “The Rise of the Nonprofit Sector”, Foreign Affairs, vol.73, No.4, 1994.
Smouts, Marie-Claude, “The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations,” International Social Science Journal, No.155, 1998.
Stoker, G., “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions”, International Social Science Journal, No.155, 1998.
Tay, Alice Erh-Soon and Eugene Kamenka, “Public Law-Private Law”, Stanley I. Benn and Gerald F. Gaus eds., Public and Private in Social Life, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.
Terry, L., “Administrative Leadership, Neo-management and the Public Management Movement”, Public Administration Review, Vol.58, No.4, 1998.
Ventriss, C., “The `Publicness` of Administrative Ethics,” Cooper, Handbook of Administrative Ethics, New York: M. Dekker, 1994.
Ventriss, C., “Toward a Public Philosophy of Public Administration: A Civic Perspective of the Public”, Public Administration Review, Vol.49, No.2, 1989.
Denhardt, Robert B., Theories of Public Organization, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1993, 2nd ed.
Walzer, M., “Introduction”, Toward GlobalCivil Society, Providence: Berghahn Books, 1995.
Weintraub, Jeff, “The Theory and Politics of the Public/private Distinction”, Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Habermas, Jürgen,〈公共領域〉, Habermas等著,甘陽主編,《社會主義—後冷戰時代的思索》,香港:牛津大學,1995年。
王甲乙,〈理論之實踐和實踐之理論--最高行政法院判例之檢討〉,《法官協會雜誌》,卷3期1,民90.6。
王振寰,〈全球化,在地化與學習型區域:理論反省與重建〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,第34期,民88。
江心波,〈國立大學行政法人化之探討〉,《考選情報》,期38,民93.03。
江明修,〈非營利組織的功能〉,http://npo.nccu.edu.tw/content/section02/item08_doc/20010619.pdf。
江明修、蔡金火、梅高文,〈再造公共性政府〉,《中國行政評論》,卷7期4,民87.9。
吳采斾,〈台灣社會福利體制轉型─民主化與全球化的衝擊與挑戰〉,東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文,民93。
吳瓊恩,〈公共行政學發展趨勢的探究:三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論的基礎〉,《公共行政學報》,期7,民91.12。
Dews, Peter, Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas, London; New York: Verso, 1992, Rev. ed.
呂建德,〈全球化、社會不平等與回應策略分析:邁向一個永續發展的全球文化計畫〉,全球化與國家發展學術研討會論文集,台北:佛光大學人文社會學院,民91。
呂建德,〈從福利國家到競爭式國家?:全球化與福利國家的危機〉,《台灣社會學》,期2,民90.12。
宋興洲,〈重新思考國家:從政治經濟到文化政治經濟〉,《政治學報》,期35,民92.6。
李建良,〈論行政法上之意思表示〉,《臺北大學法學論叢》,期90,民91.6
李英明,〈哈伯馬斯論現代西方社會與馬克思主義〉,《新制度主義與社會資本》,台北:揚智,民94。
李英明,〈資訊時代下的「國家」與「社會」〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-024.htm。
周弘,〈西方社會保障制度的經驗及其對我們的啟示〉,《中國社會科學》,期2,1996年。
周弘,〈福利國家向何處去?〉,《中國社會科學》,期3,2001.5。
周志宏,〈國立大學法人化之質變與隱憂〉,《台灣本土法學雜誌》,期49,民92.8。
周志忍,〈當代西方行政改革與管理模式轉換〉,《北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》,期4,1995年。
Donahue, John D., Joseph S. Nye, Market-based Governance: Supply Side, Demand Side, Upside, and Downside, Cambridge, Mass.: Visions of Governance in the 21st Century, 2002.
林鍾沂,〈美國的管制行政〉,《空大行政學報》,期5,民85.5。
林鍾沂,〈新公共行政與新公共管理之比較〉,《人事月刊》,卷30期6,民89.06。
俞可平,〈從權利政治學到公益政治學〉,劉軍寧編,《自由與社群》,北京:三聯,1998年。
俞可平,〈當代西方政治思潮概述〉,《教學與研究》,期6,2004。
南方朔,〈南方朔:「教授治校」和「行政法人化」都是他們說的!〉,《新新聞》,期849,民92.06.12-06.18。
姚朝森,〈許密特的國家觀〉,《公法學與政治理論─吳庚大法官榮退論文集》,台北:元照,民93。
范祥偉,〈行政法人的政策理念與實務運作〉,《人事行政》,期146,民92.12。
唐麗英,〈國立大學行政法人化 = 教育部及校長集權化 +校園戒嚴化〉,http://www.ncku.edu.tw/~fcouncil/Data/verkehr.doc。
夏鑄九,〈(重)建構公共空間--理論的反省〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,期16,民83.3。
夏鑄九,〈再理論公共空間〉,《城市與設計學報》,期2-3,民86.12。
Eddtz, S., Transforming Communication, Transforming Business: Building Responsive and Responsible Workplaces, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995.
孫國祥,〈電子治理的機會與挑戰:善治再造?〉,《國政研究報告》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-043.htm。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
93256035
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093256035
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 江明修zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chiang, Min-Hsiuen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 朱玉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Zhu, Sienaen_US
dc.creator (作者) 朱玉zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Zhu, Sienaen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 17:05:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 17:05:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 17:05:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093256035en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36100-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93256035zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文所要處理的問題為:「公共」的內容究竟為何?以及在福利國家的脈絡下公私之間如何互相滲透?本文採用Naomi Pfeffer與G. Majone的見解,將福利國家分為命令與控制型模式(command and control model)與規制型國家(regulatory state)。而這二種模式的差異可以由統治(government)和治理(governance)兩字得到說明,前者與命令與控制型相關,後者則與規制型相關。而所謂「治理」之概念,即一種國家權力向社會回歸的現象。本文以哈伯瑪斯《公共領域的結構轉型》為理論背景,探討現代國家職能由福利國家的興起與轉型之國家與社會關係與公私融合的過程。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The main purposes of this thesis are: (1) discuss the transformation of the relationship of state and society under the process of “‘societalization’ of the state” and “‘stateification’ of society” through the rise and transformation of the welfare state; (2) examine the theories of “publicness”, “public/private distinction”, and the phenomena of “public-private mix” to study the mutual relation between the public and the private; (3) review and criticize the selected public policy.
     The public/private distinction has declined under the welfare state nowadays. On the topic of welfare state, this thesis applies the opinions of Naomi Pfeffer and G. Majone that divide the welfare state into the command and control model and the regulatory state. The words “government” and “governance” could interpret the difference of these two kinds of patterns: the former is relative to the command and control model, while the latter is relative to the regulatory state. In addition, the conception of “governance” indicates the process of authority returns from the state to the society. On the topic of public/private relation, this thesis adopts the theories of Jürgen Habermas in his book: The Structure Transformation of Public Sphere, through his ideas of public sphere and its relation among the intimate sphere and the state to explore the relation between the state and society.
     In practice, this thesis takes the case of turning the national university into the corporation (juridical person) in Taiwan, and introduces to the theories discussed above: see the university as a public sphere and its reform as the transformation of welfare state.
en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) "第一章 緒論……………………...…………………………………1
     第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1
     一、 研究動機……………………………………………….1
     二、 研究目的……………………………………………….3
     第二節 研究方法與限制……………………………………………3
     一、 研究方法……………………………………………….3
     二、 研究限制……………………………………………….3
     第三節 研究流程與章節安排………………………………………4
     第二章 福利國家的興起與轉型……………………...………...6
     第一節 福利國家的興起……………………………………………7
     一、 民族國家的發展…………………………………….…8
     二、 工業革命………………………………………….……9
     三、 凱因斯主義經濟學…………………………………...11
     第二節 福利國家的挑戰與轉型………………………………..…12
     一、 福利國家遭遇的挑戰……………………………...…13
     二、 向規制型國家的轉型…………………...……………54
     第三節 命令與控制型及規制型國家的比較…………………..…22
     一、 差異…………………………………………………...22
     二、 規制型模式中國家的角色…………………………...25
     第三章 公私區分與融合………………………….…………….27
     第一節 公私區分的原則………………………….………………27
     一、 公共性……………………………………………..….27
     二、 公私區分……………………………………………...29
     三、 公共領域……….……………………………………..30
     第二節 公共行政學的公共性理論………………………………..37
     一、 公共即國家、公民…………………………………….38
     二、 公共性即公共領域………………………………...…40
     三、 公共性是政府組織相對於企業組織之不同………...41
     第三節 法學上的公私法區分……………………………………..45
     一、 公法與私法二元論………………………………..….45
     二、 公法、私法與社會法三元論…………………………48
     第四節 公私區分的質疑與挑戰………………………………..…48
     一、 女性主義對於公私區分的質疑…………………..….49
     二、 企業參與公共對話…………………………………...50
     第五節 公私相互融合的趨勢……………………………………..52
     一、 「公法私法化」與「私法公法化」……………………...53
     二、 國家與市場的融合…………………………………….56
     三、 對傳統公私部門二分的衝擊………………………….63
     第四章 個案研究:我國國立大學行政法人化之規劃…….….69
     一、 大學作為公共領域(public sphere)…………………...69
     二、 國立大學行政法人化政策發展過程………………...70
     三、 我國推動行政法人制之特色………………………...71
     四、 質疑與批評………………………………………...…73
     第五章 結論……………………………………………………….76
     一、 公私區分與融合……………………………………77
     二、 福利國家轉型下國家干預功能的轉變…………….79
     三、 由國立大學行政法人化看公共領域的再封建化.…..81
     參考資料…………………………………….………………………...84
-
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論……………………...…………………………………1
     第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1
     一、 研究動機……………………………………………….1
     二、 研究目的……………………………………………….3
     第二節 研究方法與限制……………………………………………3
     一、 研究方法……………………………………………….3
     二、 研究限制……………………………………………….3
     第三節 研究流程與章節安排………………………………………4
     第二章 福利國家的興起與轉型……………………...………...6
     第一節 福利國家的興起……………………………………………7
     一、 民族國家的發展…………………………………….…8
     二、 工業革命………………………………………….……9
     三、 凱因斯主義經濟學…………………………………...11
     第二節 福利國家的挑戰與轉型………………………………..…12
     一、 福利國家遭遇的挑戰……………………………...…13
     二、 向規制型國家的轉型…………………...……………54
     第三節 命令與控制型及規制型國家的比較…………………..…22
     一、 差異…………………………………………………...22
     二、 規制型模式中國家的角色…………………………...25
     第三章 公私區分與融合………………………….…………….27
     第一節 公私區分的原則………………………….………………27
     一、 公共性……………………………………………..….27
     二、 公私區分……………………………………………...29
     三、 公共領域……….……………………………………..30
     第二節 公共行政學的公共性理論………………………………..37
     一、 公共即國家、公民…………………………………….38
     二、 公共性即公共領域………………………………...…40
     三、 公共性是政府組織相對於企業組織之不同………...41
     第三節 法學上的公私法區分……………………………………..45
     一、 公法與私法二元論………………………………..….45
     二、 公法、私法與社會法三元論…………………………48
     第四節 公私區分的質疑與挑戰………………………………..…48
     一、 女性主義對於公私區分的質疑…………………..….49
     二、 企業參與公共對話…………………………………...50
     第五節 公私相互融合的趨勢……………………………………..52
     一、 「公法私法化」與「私法公法化」……………………...53
     二、 國家與市場的融合…………………………………….56
     三、 對傳統公私部門二分的衝擊………………………….63
     第四章 個案研究:我國國立大學行政法人化之規劃…….….69
     一、 大學作為公共領域(public sphere)…………………...69
     二、 國立大學行政法人化政策發展過程………………...70
     三、 我國推動行政法人制之特色………………………...71
     四、 質疑與批評………………………………………...…73
     第五章 結論……………………………………………………….76
     一、 公私區分與融合……………………………………77
     二、 福利國家轉型下國家干預功能的轉變…………….79
     三、 由國立大學行政法人化看公共領域的再封建化.…..81
     參考資料…………………………………….………………………...84
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093256035en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 哈伯瑪斯zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共領域zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 福利國家zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公私區分zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Habermasen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public sphereen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) publicnessen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) welfare stateen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public/ private distinctionen_US
dc.title (題名) 從命令與控制型到規制型國家:公共性概念的變遷zh_TW
dc.title (題名) From Command and Control Model to Regulatory State: The Transformation of the Concept of Publicnessen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anheier, Helmut K. & Jeremy Kendall eds., Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads, London; New York: Routledge, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago press, 1958.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bagdikian, B., The Media Monopoly, Boston: Beacon Press, 2000, 6th ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benn, Stanley I. and Gerald F. Gaus eds., Public and Private in Social Life, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beveridge, William, Full Employment in a Free Society, London: New Statesman and Nation: Reynolds News, 1944.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bock, Gisela and Susan James eds., Beyond Equality and Difference, London; New York: Routledge, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bodin, Jean, Six Liveres de la République, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burce, Maurice, The Coming of the Welfare State, London: Batsford, 1961.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Calhoun, C. ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cassirer, E., The Myth of the State, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1946.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫善豪,〈導讀〉,Erhard Eppler著,孫善豪譯,《重返政治》,台北:聯經,民89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 晏坤譯,Jody Freeman著,〈私人團體、公共職能與新行政法〉,《北大法學評論》,卷5輯2,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 袁曙宏譯,Alfredc Aman, Jr.著,〈面向新世紀的行政法〉,《行政法學研究》,期3,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬道容,〈國立大學 將改制行政法人〉,《聯合報》,民91.11.14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張世雄,〈Historical Origin of Welfare Debate in Post-keynesian Era: The Question of the Underclass and Citizen〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,卷1期2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張成福,〈公共行政的管理主義:反思與批判〉,《中國人民大學學報》,期1,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 教育部高教司,〈對國立大學改制為行政法人之說明〉,http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~sect/nctu-nthu/attach2.doc。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梅高文,〈公共行政「公正問題」與「能力問題」之研究──Habermas公共領域理論的觀點〉,政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,民84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許立一,〈對我國建立行政法人制度的省思〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/092/IA-R-092-019.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Elshtain, Jean Bethke, Public Men, Private Women: Women in Social and Political Thought, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳學明譯,Jürgen Habermas著,《合法性危機》,台北:時報文化,民83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許記泰,〈全球化下的歐盟社會福利制度與改革〉,佛光大學社會學研究所碩士論文,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳玟伶,〈哈伯瑪斯公共領域理念之研究〉,國立政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳思編譯,Jean-Pierre Gaudin,〈現代的治理,昨天和今天:借重法國政府政策得以明確的幾點認識〉,俞可平編,《治理與善治》,北京:中國社會科學文獻,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳祖洲,〈論英國新右派的福利觀〉,《南京大學學報》,期5,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳祖為,〈資本主義社會中的良善生活是私人事務嗎?--對國家中立性的批判〉,「公私領域新探:東亞觀點與西方之比較」國際學術研討會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳學明,〈哈伯瑪斯的「晚期資本主義」論評析〉, Jürgen Habermas著,陳學明譯,《合法性危機》,台北:時報文化,民83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳龍森,〈公共領域與正當性危機:哈伯瑪斯的政治社會學〉,《東亞季刊》,卷29期2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳韻如,〈性、性別與公共領域〉,《傳播研究簡訊》,期13,民87.3。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志傑,〈藉公共領域建立自主性(上)〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,期10,民93.9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 程明修,〈制度的終結?--國立大學行政法人化之選擇〉,《法學講座》,期25,民93.01。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅振焜譯,Peter Drucker著,《後資本主義社會》,台北:時報,民83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Frederickson, H. G., The Spirit of Public Administration, San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 童世駿,〈公與私:劃界問題的歸屬問題〉,「公私領域新探:東亞觀點與西方之比較」國際學術研討會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃宗智,〈國家和社會之間的第三領域〉, Jürgen Habermas等著,甘陽主編,《社會主義—後冷戰時代的思索》,香港:牛津大學,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃斌,〈關於西方福利國家理論與福利國家的幾點思考〉,《廣西社會科學》,期2,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃競涓,〈性別、公民與市民社會〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-069.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄒川雄,〈正當性危機導讀〉, Jürgen Habermas著,陳學明譯,《合法性危機》,台北:時報文化,民83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄒勳元,〈經濟全球化下政府治理轉型與社會問題之研究—以OECD國家為例〉,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,民89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 廖俊松,〈民營化之外—歐美福利國家民營化的省思〉,《空大行政學報》,期9,民88.6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 廖炳惠,〈導讀:中西女性與公共領域〉,《台北縣立文化中心季刊》,期38,民82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉宗德,〈公法與私法的區別〉,《行政法爭議問題研究(上)》,民89.12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 詹中原,《民營化政策:公共行政理論與實務之分析》,台北:五南,民82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉新圓,〈何謂行政法人化〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/092/EC-B-092-013.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Friedman, Milton, Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 潘萍、徐強勝,〈公私法關係論綱〉,《河北法學》,卷4期21,2003.7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡茂寅,〈郵政利用關係的法律性質--以公法與私法二元論之檢討為中心〉,《月旦法學》,期15,民85.8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭秉文,〈社會權利:現代福利國家模式的起源與詮釋〉,《山東大學學報》,期2,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭讚源,〈既競爭又合作、既依賴又自主:社會福利民營化過程中政府與民間非營利組織之角色與定位〉,《社區發展季刊》,期80,民86.12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭鈺,〈「公共性」概念意涵之探索性研究〉,國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文,民91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴兩陽,〈經濟優先,社福更不能緩—全球化下社會政策的影響與出路〉,《社區發展季刊》,期102,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝沛學,〈全球治理:國際合作的新模式?〉,中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文,民91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 魏明德,〈公共領域、公共空間與政治版圖〉,《哲學與文化》,卷31期6,民93.6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉軍寧編,《自由與社群》,北京:三聯,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 嚴錦堂,〈政府改造的另一取向--「行政法人」之探討〉,《人事月刊》,卷38期3,民93.03。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顧忠華,〈社會運動的「機構化」:兼論非營利組織在公民社會中的角色〉,張茂桂、鄭永年主編,《兩岸社會運動分析》,台北:新自然主義,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Friedmann, John, Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顧淑馨,〈從學理來探討公共性和企業性問題─以日本的民營化為例─〉,《中國行政評論》,卷9期4,民89.9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) George, Victor, Ideology and Social Welfare, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gies, D. L. et al., The Nonprofit Organization: Essential Readings, Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gutmann, Amy ed., Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, Jürgen, T. Burger & F. Lawrence trans., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, Jürgen, T. McCarthy trans., Legitimation Crisis, Boston: Beacon Press, 1975.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉毓秀主編,《女性、國家、照顧工作》,台北:女書,民86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, Jürgen, Thomas McCarthy trans., Communication and the Evolution of Society, Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hayek, Friedrich A., The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Herring, P., Public Administration and Public Interest, New York: Russell & Russell, 1967.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hughes, Owen, Public Management & Administration, Macmillian Press, 2003, 3rd ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kooiman, J. ed., Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Landes, Joan B. ed., Feminism, the Publics and the Private, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levitt, T., The Third Sector: New Tactics for a Responsive Society, New York: Amacom, 1973.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, Thomas, The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Millett, Kate, Sexual Politics, Garden City: Doubleday, 1790.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mishra, Ramesh, The Welfare State in Crisis: Social Thought and Social Change, Brighton, Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡繼光等譯,Thomas L. Friedman著,《了解全球化》,台北:聯經,民89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moore, R. L., Selling God: American Religion in the Marketplace of Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nicholsen, Shierry Weber ed. & trans, The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St. Martin`s Press, 1973.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Offe, Claus, Contradictions of the Welfare State, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1984, 1st ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pateman, Carole, The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peters, B. Guy, The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Phillips, Anne ed., Feminism & Politics, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Powell, J. Enoch, Still to Decide, London: Batsford, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rainey, Hal G., Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭武國譯,Anthony Giddens著,《第三條路:社會民主的更新》,台北:聯經,民88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rein, Martin, Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy : the Rise and Fall of Policy Regimes, Armonk, N.Y. : M.E. Sharpe,1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robbins, Bruce ed., The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosenbloom, David H. with the assistance of Deborah D. Goldman, Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector, New York: Random House, 1989, 2nd ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosenbloom, David H., Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics and Law in the Public Sector, , New York McGraw-Hill Inc, 1998, 4th ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sabine, George H., A History of Political Theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961, 3rd ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salamon, L. & Anheier, Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis, NY: Manchester University Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sassoon, Anne Showstack ed., Women and the State: the Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private, London: Routledge, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schiller, H., Culture, Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmitt, Carl, Der Begriff des Politischen, Berlin, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, George Schwab trans. Chicato & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黎思復、黎廷弼譯,Thomas Hobbes,《利維坦》,北京:商務,1986年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Self, P., Government by the Market, MacMillan Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shafritz, Jay M. & Albert C. Hyde eds., Classics of Public Administration, Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1997, 4th ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Soley, L. C., Leasing the Ivory Tower: The Corporate Takeover of Academia, Boston: South End Press, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sturdy, Steve ed., Medicine, Health and Public Sphere in Britian, 1600-2000, London: Routledge, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waldo, Dwight, The Administrative State: a Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, New York: Ronald Press Co., 1948.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walzer, M., “Introduction”, Toward GlobalCivil Society, Providence: Berghahn Books, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weintraub, Jeff & Krishan Kumar, eds., Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wistow, Gerald, Martin Knapp, Brain Hardy & Caroline Allen, Social Care in a Mixed Economy, Buckingham: Open University Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Woolf, Virginia, A Room of One’s Own, London: Penguin Books, 1945.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編,《列寧全集》,卷42,北京:人民,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 聯合報編譯組譯,George Soros著,《全球資本主義危機:岌岌可危的開放社會》,台北:聯經,民87。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王學東譯,Franz-Xaver Kaufmann著,《社會福利國家面臨的挑戰》,北京:商務,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 丘昌泰,《公共管理:理論與實務手冊》,台北:元照,民89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 古允文譯,Gosta Esping-Andersen著,《福利資本主義的三個世界》,台北:巨流,民90.9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 史際春、鄧峰著,《經濟法總論》,北京:法律出版社,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台灣行政法學會主編,《行政法爭議問題研究(上)》,台北:五南,民89.12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 甘陽主編,Jürgen Habermas等著,《社會主義—後冷戰時代的思索》,香港:牛津大學,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江明修,《第三部門:經營策略與社會參與》,台北:智勝,民89.4。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何兆武譯,Jean Jacques Rousseau著,《社會契約論》,北京:商務,1980年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 余佩珊譯,Peter Drucker著,《非營利機構的經營之道》,台北:遠流,民83.8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳庚,《行政法之理論與實用》,台北:三民,民89,版6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝宗林等譯,Friedrich A. Hayek著,《不要命的自負:社會主義的種種錯誤》,台北:遠流,民84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳庚大法官榮退論文集編輯委員會編,《公法學與政治理論─吳庚大法官榮退論文集》,台北:元照,民93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳錫堂、楊滿郁譯,Lawrence Friedman著,《法律與社會》,台北:巨流,民80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂健忠譯,Niccolo Machiavelli著,《李維羅馬史疏義》,台北:左岸文化,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李英明,《新制度主義與社會資本》,台北:揚智,民94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈宗靈,《比較法研究》,北京:北京大學,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林萬億,《福利國家的形成與社會公平》,台北:台灣大學,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林萬億,《福利國家—歷史比較分析》,台北:巨流,民83.10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林鍾沂,《行政學》,台北:三民,民90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞可平編,《治理與善治》,北京:社會科學文獻,2000.9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡曉進等譯,Andrew Gamble著,《政治和命運》,南京:江蘇人民,2003.9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Connolly, W. ed., Legitimacy and the State, New York: New York University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏道平譯,Friedrich A. Hayek著,《個人主義與經濟秩序》,台北:台灣銀行,民60,再版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫善豪譯,Erhard Eppler著,《重返政治》,台北:聯經,民89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐炳譯,William Wade著,《行政法》,北京:中國大百科全書,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 殷海光譯,Friedrich A. Hayek著,《到奴役之路》,台北:文星,民54。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬音等譯,John Keane著,《公共生活與晚期資本主義》,北京:社會科學文獻,1999.2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬清槐譯,Thomas Paine著,《人權論》,載《潘恩選集》,北京:商務,1982年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張五常,《賣桔者言》,台北:遠流,民78。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張茂桂、鄭永年主編,《兩岸社會運動分析》,台北:新自然主義,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曹玉文,《新佛洛伊德主義與馬克思主義》,台北:時報,民81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曹衛東等譯,Jürgen Habermas著,《公共領域的結構轉型》,台北:聯經,民93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 藍科正、黃美齡譯,Milton Friedman著,《資本主義與自由》,台北:萬象,民82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳思賢,《西洋政治思想史—近代英國篇》,台北:五南,民87.8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Allison, Graham T., “Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?”, Jay M. Shafritz & Albert C. Hyde eds., Classics of Public Administration, Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1997, 4th ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ambrozas, Diana, “The University as Public Sphere”, Canadian Journal of Communition, Vol.23, No.1, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bellone, C. J. and G.. F. Goerl, “Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and Democracy”, Public Administration Review, Vol.52, No.2, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benhabib, Seyla, “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas”, Landes ed., Feminism, the Publics and the Private, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borchorst, Anette & Sim Birte, “Women and Advanced Welfare State – A New Kind of Patriarchal Power?”, Anne Showstack Sassoon ed., Women and the State: the Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private, London: Routledge, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boyd, Josh, “Corporate Rhetoric Participates in Public Dialogue: A Solution to the Public/Private Conundrum”, The Southern Journal of Communication, vol.66, No.4, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bozeman, Barry, “Exploring the Limits of Public and Private Sectors: Sector Boundaries as Maginot Line”, Public Administration Review, Vol.48, No.2, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burlingame, Dwight F., “Corporate Philanthropy’s Future”, Helmut K. Anheier & Jeremy Kendall eds., Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads, London; New York: Routledge, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, Terry L., Handbook of Administrative Ethics, New York: M. Dekker, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cennaro, Angela, “Memory beyond the Public Sphere: The Francoist Repression Remembered in Aragon”, History and Memory, Bloomington: IN : Indiana University Press, Fall 2002, Vol.14, Iss. 1/2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dietz, Mary G., “Citizenship with a Feminist Face: The Problem with Maternal Thinking,” Joan B. Landes ed., Feminism, the Publics and the Private, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Filer, “The Filer Commission Report”, D. L. Gies et al., The Nonprofit Organization: Essential Readings, Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/ Cole Publishing, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fraser, Nancy, “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”, C. Calhoun ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, Jürgen, “The Idea of University: Learning Processes”, Shierry Weber Nicholsen ed. & trans, The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hansmann, H. B., “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise”, Yale Law Journal, Vol.89, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haque, M. Shamsul, “The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Govenance”, Public Administration Review, Vol.61, No.1, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Iversen and Wren, “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy”, World Politics, Vol.50 No.4, July 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kelly, R. M., “An Inclusive Democratic Polity, Representative Bureaucracies, and the New Public Management”, Public Administration Review, Vol.58, No.3, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kooiman, J., “Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics and Diversity”, J. Kooiman ed., Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Denhardt, Robert B. & Janet V. Denhardt, The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering, Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lynn, L. E., “The New Public Management: How to Transform a Theme into a Legacy”, Public Administration Review, Vol.58, No.3, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Majone, Giandomenico, “From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance”, Journal of Public Policy, Vol.17, No.2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, A., “What Does Globalization Have to Do with the Erosion of Welfare State? Sorting out the Issues ”, Center for Social Policy Research Discussion Working Paper No.1, Bremen: University of Bremen, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McOmber, James B., “Clarifying the Public/Private Distinction by Eliminating It?: A Response to Josh Boyd”, The Southern Journal of Communication, Vol.66, No.4, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Newman, John Henry, “The Idea of a University”, http://www..fordham.edu/halsall/mod/newman/newman-university.html.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Okin, Susan Moller,“Gender, the Public, and the Private”, Anne Phillips ed., Feminism & Politics, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pateman, Carole, “Equality, Difference, Subordination: The Politics of Motherhood and Women’s Citizenship,” Bock and James eds., Beyond Equality and Difference, London; New York: Routledge, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pateman, Carole, “Feminist Criques of the Public/Private Dichotomy”, Benn & Gaus eds., Public and Private in Social Life, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pateman, Carole, “The Patriachal Welfare State”, Amy Gutmann ed., Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pfeffer, Naomi, “Fertility Counts: From Equity to Outcome”, Steve Sturdy ed., Medicine, Health and Public Sphere in Britian, 1600-2000, London: Routledge, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Denhardt, Robert B., Public Administration: An Action Orientation, Pacific Grove, Cal: Brooks/Cole, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ranson, Stewart and John Stewart, “Citizenship and Government: The Challenge for Management in the Public Domain,” Political Studies, Vol.37 No.1, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rhodes, R. A. W., “The New Governance: Governing without Government”, Political Studies, No.44, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robbins, Bruce, “The Public as Phantom”, Bruce Robbins ed., The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salamon, Lester, “The Rise of the Nonprofit Sector”, Foreign Affairs, vol.73, No.4, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smouts, Marie-Claude, “The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations,” International Social Science Journal, No.155, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stoker, G., “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions”, International Social Science Journal, No.155, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tay, Alice Erh-Soon and Eugene Kamenka, “Public Law-Private Law”, Stanley I. Benn and Gerald F. Gaus eds., Public and Private in Social Life, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Terry, L., “Administrative Leadership, Neo-management and the Public Management Movement”, Public Administration Review, Vol.58, No.4, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ventriss, C., “The `Publicness` of Administrative Ethics,” Cooper, Handbook of Administrative Ethics, New York: M. Dekker, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ventriss, C., “Toward a Public Philosophy of Public Administration: A Civic Perspective of the Public”, Public Administration Review, Vol.49, No.2, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Denhardt, Robert B., Theories of Public Organization, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1993, 2nd ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walzer, M., “Introduction”, Toward GlobalCivil Society, Providence: Berghahn Books, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weintraub, Jeff, “The Theory and Politics of the Public/private Distinction”, Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, Jürgen,〈公共領域〉, Habermas等著,甘陽主編,《社會主義—後冷戰時代的思索》,香港:牛津大學,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王甲乙,〈理論之實踐和實踐之理論--最高行政法院判例之檢討〉,《法官協會雜誌》,卷3期1,民90.6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王振寰,〈全球化,在地化與學習型區域:理論反省與重建〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,第34期,民88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江心波,〈國立大學行政法人化之探討〉,《考選情報》,期38,民93.03。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江明修,〈非營利組織的功能〉,http://npo.nccu.edu.tw/content/section02/item08_doc/20010619.pdf。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江明修、蔡金火、梅高文,〈再造公共性政府〉,《中國行政評論》,卷7期4,民87.9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳采斾,〈台灣社會福利體制轉型─民主化與全球化的衝擊與挑戰〉,東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文,民93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳瓊恩,〈公共行政學發展趨勢的探究:三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論的基礎〉,《公共行政學報》,期7,民91.12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dews, Peter, Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas, London; New York: Verso, 1992, Rev. ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂建德,〈全球化、社會不平等與回應策略分析:邁向一個永續發展的全球文化計畫〉,全球化與國家發展學術研討會論文集,台北:佛光大學人文社會學院,民91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂建德,〈從福利國家到競爭式國家?:全球化與福利國家的危機〉,《台灣社會學》,期2,民90.12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 宋興洲,〈重新思考國家:從政治經濟到文化政治經濟〉,《政治學報》,期35,民92.6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李建良,〈論行政法上之意思表示〉,《臺北大學法學論叢》,期90,民91.6zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李英明,〈哈伯馬斯論現代西方社會與馬克思主義〉,《新制度主義與社會資本》,台北:揚智,民94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李英明,〈資訊時代下的「國家」與「社會」〉,《國政評論》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-024.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周弘,〈西方社會保障制度的經驗及其對我們的啟示〉,《中國社會科學》,期2,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周弘,〈福利國家向何處去?〉,《中國社會科學》,期3,2001.5。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周志宏,〈國立大學法人化之質變與隱憂〉,《台灣本土法學雜誌》,期49,民92.8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周志忍,〈當代西方行政改革與管理模式轉換〉,《北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》,期4,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Donahue, John D., Joseph S. Nye, Market-based Governance: Supply Side, Demand Side, Upside, and Downside, Cambridge, Mass.: Visions of Governance in the 21st Century, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林鍾沂,〈美國的管制行政〉,《空大行政學報》,期5,民85.5。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林鍾沂,〈新公共行政與新公共管理之比較〉,《人事月刊》,卷30期6,民89.06。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞可平,〈從權利政治學到公益政治學〉,劉軍寧編,《自由與社群》,北京:三聯,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞可平,〈當代西方政治思潮概述〉,《教學與研究》,期6,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 南方朔,〈南方朔:「教授治校」和「行政法人化」都是他們說的!〉,《新新聞》,期849,民92.06.12-06.18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 姚朝森,〈許密特的國家觀〉,《公法學與政治理論─吳庚大法官榮退論文集》,台北:元照,民93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范祥偉,〈行政法人的政策理念與實務運作〉,《人事行政》,期146,民92.12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 唐麗英,〈國立大學行政法人化 = 教育部及校長集權化 +校園戒嚴化〉,http://www.ncku.edu.tw/~fcouncil/Data/verkehr.doc。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏鑄九,〈(重)建構公共空間--理論的反省〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,期16,民83.3。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏鑄九,〈再理論公共空間〉,《城市與設計學報》,期2-3,民86.12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eddtz, S., Transforming Communication, Transforming Business: Building Responsive and Responsible Workplaces, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫國祥,〈電子治理的機會與挑戰:善治再造?〉,《國政研究報告》,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-043.htm。zh_TW