| dc.contributor.advisor | 莊奕琦 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林盈利 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林盈利 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2000 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 17:21:02 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 17:21:02 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 17:21:02 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | A2002001225 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36158 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 經濟研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 88258003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 89 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文引援Peretto(1998b)的研發模型，假設人口數固定的情況下，進一步延伸設定知識外溢性分別處於研發、生產技術，探討不同技術設定對於經濟成長率及廠商家數的影響，亦即經濟成長率及市場競爭程度間的關連性。 在本文的模型內，可同時決定經濟成長率與廠商家數。模型顯示：（1）當生產與研發技術皆具有外溢性時，其對應的經濟成長率高於其他情況，而廠商家數與只有研發技術具外溢性時相同，（2）生產或研發分別具有外溢性時，經濟成長率與廠商家數相對於其他情況而言，皆須視外生參數而定，（3）生產與研發技術皆不具外溢性時，其對應的經濟成長率低於其他情況，而廠商家數則與只有生產技術具外溢性時相同。 就單一產業而言，外生參數變動導致廠商家數與經濟成長之間具有抵換關係，亦即市場競爭程度與成長率間具抵換關係。若從跨產業的角度來分析，當經濟體系內存在許多不同技術型態的產業時，其經濟成長背後的動力亦會隨著技術型態的相對比重而有所影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001225 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 研究發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 知識外溢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 市場競爭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 經濟成長 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | R&D | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | knowledge spillovers | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | market competition | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | economic growth | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 研發知識外溢、市場競爭與經濟成長 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.Aghion, P., and Peter Howitt, (1992). “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60(2),March, 323-351. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Beath, J., and Katsoulacos, Y., (1991). The Economic Theory of Product Differentiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Cass, D., (1965)“Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation,” Review of Economic Studies 32 , 233-240. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.Chandler, A., (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism . Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D., (1989).” Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D.” Economic Journal 99, 569-596. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.Dasgupta, P., and Stiglitz, J., (1980). “Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity.” Economic Journal 90, 266-293. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.Dixit, A., and Stiglitz, J., (1977). “Monopolistic competition and optimal product diversity.” American Economic Review 67, 297-308. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.Freeman, C., (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J., (1991). Game Theory .Cambridge,MA. MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10.Grossman, G.M., and E.Helpman , (1991a). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge MA .MIT University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11.Kamien, M., and Schwartz, A., (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12.Lee, T., and Wilde, L., (1980). “Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 431-436. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13.Loury, G., (1979). “Market Structure and Innovation, “Quarterly Journal of Economics 93, 395-410. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14.Lucas, R., (1993). “Making a Miracle,” Econometrica 61(2),March, 251-272. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15.Malerba, F. (1992). “Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical Change.” Economic Journal 102, 845-859. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16.Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. (1995). “Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovators.” Cambridge Journal of Economic 19, 47-65. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17.Mowery, D., and N. Rosenberg. (1989). Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18.Novshek, W., and Sonnenschein, H., (1987). “General Equilibrium with Free Entry: A Synthetic Approach to the Theory of Perfect Competition.” Journal of Economic Literature 25, 1281-1306. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19.Peretto, P. (1996b). “Sunk Costs, Market Structure and Growth.” International Economic Review 37, 895-923. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20.Peretto, P. (1998b). “Technological Change and Population Growth.”Journal of Economic Growth 3, 283-311. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21.Ramsey, E., (1928). “A Mathematical Theory of Saving,” Economic Journal 38, 543-559. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22.Scherer, F. (1984). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23.Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24.Schumpeter, R., (1992). “Sunk Costs and Market Structure: A Review Article,” Journal of Industrial Economics 40, 125-134. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25.Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure. Cambridge: MIT University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26.Thompson, P., and D. Waldo. (1994). “Growth and Trustified Capitalism.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 445-462. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27.Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
