學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 兩岸共同打擊犯罪問題之研究
The study of cooperation across the Taiwan straits on crime-fighting question
作者 丁樹蘭
貢獻者 邱坤玄
丁樹蘭
日期 2001
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 17:32:33 (UTC+8)
摘要 兩岸經過四十多年的分離、分治,隨著1987年7月15日我方政府宣佈解嚴,同年11月間開放大陸探親後,兩岸人員往來頻繁,經貿文化之互動更為密切,也衍生了不少問題。
      因兩岸政治之對立,無法營建共同打擊犯罪之架構與機制。不法者利用兩岸司法權無法伸展,互相勾結,謀求暴利,甚至有許多在台灣犯罪者,事後逃往大陸藏匿。長此下去,因無法將犯罪者繩之以法,使之受應有之制裁,此不僅對台灣的受害者或家屬無以慰藉,傷害了台灣人民的感情,對兩岸的治安亦堪憂。故兩岸如能暫時拋開政治的意識形態,加強民間與學術之交流,基於互利互惠原則,促進雙邊良性互動之發展,建立合作打擊犯罪之管道與機制,攜手共同打擊犯罪,以消弭日益嚴重的兩岸犯罪問題,實乃兩岸人民之福。
      本論文從探討兩岸開放探親以來之犯罪狀況,諸如偷渡、走私、海上搶劫、漁事糾紛及其他相關之犯罪等著手研析。並對兩岸目前共同打擊犯罪所面臨之困境與應有之作為加以探討,再研討國際刑事司法互助及罪犯管轄之歸屬與引渡之方式,透過對分裂國家之刑事司法互助之介紹,進而找尋兩岸刑事司法互助之辦法,以期能找出兩岸共同打擊犯罪之策略,進而有效共同打擊兩岸之犯罪。
The 4-decade-odd long political division of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait under separate regimes saw its end on July 15 1987, when the R.O.C. government lifted ban on visits to relatives in China in November the same year. Interchanges between people on both sides of the strait frequented, just as economic, trade and cultural activities, with problems.
      The political rivalry of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait has made it less successful to achieve any agreement on organizations and systems aiming to fighting crimes. Criminals, by taking advantage of loopholes of the judicial systems on both sides, work together for illegal lucre. It is nothing new today that Taiwanese criminals evade to and remain in China after unlawful operations. Should this practice go on without any criminal see justice be served, victims or their families in Taiwan would not meet relief and sentiment of Taiwanese people would also be hurt, let alone the public security of the two societies separated by the Taiwan Strait. It is paramount that both sides of the Taiwan Strait do, for the sake of mutual benefit and interest, ignore their own ideologies and strengthen academic exchanges in the direction of benign interaction before eventually reaching cooperation channels and systems that would help fight against crimes.
      This article includes studies on criminal acts on both sides of the Taiwan Straits, including stow-way, smuggling, maritime piracy, fishing disputes and other associated crimes, since the lift on ban on relative visitations. It also focuses on difficulties the authorities on both sides confront with when it comes to joint effort in fighting crimes and with proposals. Also includes are studies on mutual assistance by international criminal judicial systems on jurisdiction and extradition. Hopefully we could locate ways to make criminal justices on both sides of the Taiwan Strait help each other, through introduction on updates of divided nations in this regard, in waging effective joint effort against crimes.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
90
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCU2502012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 邱坤玄zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 丁樹蘭zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 丁樹蘭zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2001en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 17:32:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 17:32:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 17:32:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G91NCCU2502012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36206-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 兩岸經過四十多年的分離、分治,隨著1987年7月15日我方政府宣佈解嚴,同年11月間開放大陸探親後,兩岸人員往來頻繁,經貿文化之互動更為密切,也衍生了不少問題。
      因兩岸政治之對立,無法營建共同打擊犯罪之架構與機制。不法者利用兩岸司法權無法伸展,互相勾結,謀求暴利,甚至有許多在台灣犯罪者,事後逃往大陸藏匿。長此下去,因無法將犯罪者繩之以法,使之受應有之制裁,此不僅對台灣的受害者或家屬無以慰藉,傷害了台灣人民的感情,對兩岸的治安亦堪憂。故兩岸如能暫時拋開政治的意識形態,加強民間與學術之交流,基於互利互惠原則,促進雙邊良性互動之發展,建立合作打擊犯罪之管道與機制,攜手共同打擊犯罪,以消弭日益嚴重的兩岸犯罪問題,實乃兩岸人民之福。
      本論文從探討兩岸開放探親以來之犯罪狀況,諸如偷渡、走私、海上搶劫、漁事糾紛及其他相關之犯罪等著手研析。並對兩岸目前共同打擊犯罪所面臨之困境與應有之作為加以探討,再研討國際刑事司法互助及罪犯管轄之歸屬與引渡之方式,透過對分裂國家之刑事司法互助之介紹,進而找尋兩岸刑事司法互助之辦法,以期能找出兩岸共同打擊犯罪之策略,進而有效共同打擊兩岸之犯罪。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The 4-decade-odd long political division of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait under separate regimes saw its end on July 15 1987, when the R.O.C. government lifted ban on visits to relatives in China in November the same year. Interchanges between people on both sides of the strait frequented, just as economic, trade and cultural activities, with problems.
      The political rivalry of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait has made it less successful to achieve any agreement on organizations and systems aiming to fighting crimes. Criminals, by taking advantage of loopholes of the judicial systems on both sides, work together for illegal lucre. It is nothing new today that Taiwanese criminals evade to and remain in China after unlawful operations. Should this practice go on without any criminal see justice be served, victims or their families in Taiwan would not meet relief and sentiment of Taiwanese people would also be hurt, let alone the public security of the two societies separated by the Taiwan Strait. It is paramount that both sides of the Taiwan Strait do, for the sake of mutual benefit and interest, ignore their own ideologies and strengthen academic exchanges in the direction of benign interaction before eventually reaching cooperation channels and systems that would help fight against crimes.
      This article includes studies on criminal acts on both sides of the Taiwan Straits, including stow-way, smuggling, maritime piracy, fishing disputes and other associated crimes, since the lift on ban on relative visitations. It also focuses on difficulties the authorities on both sides confront with when it comes to joint effort in fighting crimes and with proposals. Also includes are studies on mutual assistance by international criminal judicial systems on jurisdiction and extradition. Hopefully we could locate ways to make criminal justices on both sides of the Taiwan Strait help each other, through introduction on updates of divided nations in this regard, in waging effective joint effort against crimes.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
      第一節 前言-----1
      第二節 研究動機與目的-----2
      第三節 研究方法與範圍-----5
      第四節 研究困難與研究限制-----6
      第五節 文獻檢閱-----7
      第六節 研究架構與研究流程-----27
     
     第二章 兩岸刑事案件類型之探討
      第一節 偷渡-----31
      第二節 走私-----49
      第三節 海上搶劫及漁事糾紛-----72
      第四節 其他相關之犯罪-----78
     
     第三章 兩岸共同打擊犯罪現況之探討
      第一節 概況-----86
      第二節 金門協議-----90
      第三節 兩岸會談-----91
      第四節 兩岸罪犯遣返案例-----97
     
     第四章 現行兩岸共同打擊犯罪所面臨之困境與具體作為
      第一節 兩岸共同打擊犯罪共識之建立-----102
      第二節 兩岸加入WTO後預期犯罪型態之變化-----104
      第三節 兩岸共同打擊犯罪所面臨之困境-----106
      第四節 兩岸共同打擊犯罪應有之作為-----112
     
     第五章 國際刑事司法互助與兩岸刑事司法互助之探討
      第一節 司法互助的意義與種類-----117
      第二節 國際刑事司法互助之原則-----118
      第三節 罪犯管轄的歸屬與引渡的方式-----123
      第四節 分裂國家刑事司法互助-----137
      第五節 國際刑事司法互助與兩岸刑事司法互助-----141
     
      第六節 訂定兩岸刑事司法互助協定-----149
     
     第六章 結論
      第一節 研究發現-----154
      第二節 建議-----157
     
     
     表1 大陸地區人民非法入境收容、遣返人數統計表-----44
     表2 政府收容、遣返大陸地區人民非法入境之財政負擔統計表-----45
     表3 台灣地區歷年來查獲中共製式槍枝表-----62
     表4 1999年至2000年查獲大陸走私槍械毒品及收容偷渡犯統計表-----63
     表5 台灣地區查獲毒品種類數量統計表-----66
     表6 保安警察第三總隊1996年至1999年查獲贓汽機車統計表-----71
     表7 1996年至2001年5月間我國船隻遭中共挾持或搶劫事件表-----76
     表8 2001年1月至2002年7月我方漁船被大陸漁工挾持一覽表-----77
     表9 民國79年12月9日經金門遣返潛逃大陸刑事犯資料表-----98
     表10 民國80年3月31日經馬祖遣返潛逃大陸刑事犯資料表-----98
     表11 民國80年7月30日經馬祖遣返潛逃大陸刑事犯資料表-----99
     表12 近四年全國查獲來自大陸地區(含香港)之毒品統計表-----105
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCU2502012en_US
dc.title (題名) 兩岸共同打擊犯罪問題之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The study of cooperation across the Taiwan straits on crime-fighting questionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen