學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 勞資遊說賽局與關稅保護模型
作者 吳依芳
Wu ,I - Fang
貢獻者 王智賢
吳依芳
Wu ,I - Fang
關鍵詞 工會
遊說
關稅保護
日期 2003
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 17:36:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 大部份的工會遊說文獻,假設工會的目標函數受就業量與工資影響,且影響方向為正。但在真實世界中其實不僅止於此,吾人觀察國際工會運動,發現工會亦重視產品的國內價格,因此本文希望可以提出一個模型,將這個現象納入其中。本文以 Wang, Koo and Chen (2003) 的模型為基礎,加入工會對國內產品價格的關心,並探討工會和廠商的遊說行為, 將對貿易政策產生何種影響,產品的國內價格又如何變動。另外,亦嘗試找尋遊說賽局的子賽局完美均衡,並與只有廠商遊說的情況比較。
      本文發現,當參與遊說的兩部門利益方向一致,遊說標價皆落於國際價格的同一側,換句話說,不是同時高於國際價格,就是同時低於國際價格,那麼,遊說競賽的結果,不利於消費者福利。如果參與遊說的兩部門利益方向不同,其中一部門的遊說標價高於國際價格,另一部門的遊說標價則低於國際價格,只要勞工參與工會的比例大,則參與遊說的部門皆為廠商,可以提昇消費者福利;不過若是勞工參與工會的比例小,則提案的兩部門,一為廠商,一為工會,方能對消費者的福利有所增進。另外,若是聯合工會(跨產業的工會)參與遊說,消費者福利將達到最大。
      因此工會加入遊說競賽,對消費者福利是提昇還是減損並無法確定,須視勞工參與工會的比例高低及對手部門而定。不過可以肯定,聯合工會的出現,對消費者來說,不蒂是一項福音。本文乃啟發自國際工會運動事件,並由模型的結論之一可得到和現實世界一致的趨勢,雖然事實上遊說行為會比模型來的複雜許多,不過這個模型仍貼近真實世界,可得到相同的觀察。
參考文獻 翁永和、劉碧珍 (2001),「貿易政策、工會談判力與進口穿透 」,《人文及社會科學集刊》, 第十三卷, 第四期, 417 - 438 頁。
Aidt, Toke S. (1997), Cooperative Lobbying and Endogenous Trade Policy, Public Choice, 93 (3-4), 455-475.
Brander, J. A. and Spencer, B. J. (1988), Unionized Oligopoly and International Trade Policy, Journal of International Economics, 24, 217-234.
Gaston, Noel and Trefler, Daniel (1994b), Protection, Trade and Wages: Evidence for U.S. Manufacturing, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 574-593.
Gaston, Noel and Trefler, Daniel (1995), Union Wage Sensetivity to Trade and Protection: Theory and Evidence, Journal of International Economics, 39, 1-25.
Goldberg, Pinelopi K. and Maggi, Giovanni (1999), Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation, The American Economic Review, 89 (5), 1135-1155。
Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1994), Protection for Sale, The American Economic Review, 84 (4), 833-850.
Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1995), Trade Wars and Trade Talks, The Journal of Political Economy, 103 (4), 675-708.
Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1996), Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics, The Review of Economic Studies, 63 (2), 265-286.
Hillman, Arye L. (1982), Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives, The American Economic Review, 72 (5), 1180-1187.
Hillman, Arye L. and Ursprung Heinrich W. (1988), Domestic Politics, Foreign Interests, and International Trade Policy, The American Economic Review, 78 (4), 719-745.
Magee, Christopher (2002), Endogenous Trade Policy and Lobby Formation: An Application to the Free-Rider Problem, Journal of International Economics, 57, 449-471.
Mezzetti, C. and Dinopoulos, E. (1991), Domestic Unionization and Import Competition, Journal of International Economics, 31, 79-100.
Mitra, Devashish (1999), Endogenous Lobby Formation and Endogenous Protection: A Long Run Model of Trade Policy Determination, The American Economic Review, 89 (5), 1116-1134.
Mitra, Devashish (2002), Endogenous Political Organization and the Value of Trade Agreements, Journal of International Economics, 57, 473-485.
Panagariya, A. and R. Duttagupta (2002), Politics of Free Trade Areas: Tariffs versus Quotas, Journal of International Economics, 58, 413-427.
Pecorino, Paul (1997), Exogenous Tariff Changes with an Endogenous Lobbying Response, Public Choice, 92, 91-108.
Peltzman, Sam (1976), Toward a More General Theory of Regulation, Journal of Law and Economics, 19 (2), 211-240.
Rama, Martin and Tabellini, Guido (1998), Lobbying by Capital and Labor over Trade and Labor Market Policies, European Economic Review, 42, 1295-1316.
Riezman, Raymond and Wilson, John Douglas (1997), Political Reform and Trade Policy, Journal of International Economics, 42, 67-90.
Stigler, George (1971), The Theory of Economic Regulation, Bell Journal of Economic Management and Science, 2, 3-21.
Wallerstein, Michael (1987), Unemployment, Collective Bargaining, and the Demand for Protection, American Journal of Political Science, 31 (4), 729-752.
Wang, Jue-Shyan, Hui-Wen Koo, and Tain-Jy Chen (2003), Resource Rivalry and Endogenous Lobby, working paper.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
91255012
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091255012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 王智賢zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 吳依芳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wu ,I - Fangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳依芳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wu ,I - Fangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 17:36:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 17:36:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 17:36:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0091255012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36214-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91255012zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 大部份的工會遊說文獻,假設工會的目標函數受就業量與工資影響,且影響方向為正。但在真實世界中其實不僅止於此,吾人觀察國際工會運動,發現工會亦重視產品的國內價格,因此本文希望可以提出一個模型,將這個現象納入其中。本文以 Wang, Koo and Chen (2003) 的模型為基礎,加入工會對國內產品價格的關心,並探討工會和廠商的遊說行為, 將對貿易政策產生何種影響,產品的國內價格又如何變動。另外,亦嘗試找尋遊說賽局的子賽局完美均衡,並與只有廠商遊說的情況比較。
      本文發現,當參與遊說的兩部門利益方向一致,遊說標價皆落於國際價格的同一側,換句話說,不是同時高於國際價格,就是同時低於國際價格,那麼,遊說競賽的結果,不利於消費者福利。如果參與遊說的兩部門利益方向不同,其中一部門的遊說標價高於國際價格,另一部門的遊說標價則低於國際價格,只要勞工參與工會的比例大,則參與遊說的部門皆為廠商,可以提昇消費者福利;不過若是勞工參與工會的比例小,則提案的兩部門,一為廠商,一為工會,方能對消費者的福利有所增進。另外,若是聯合工會(跨產業的工會)參與遊說,消費者福利將達到最大。
      因此工會加入遊說競賽,對消費者福利是提昇還是減損並無法確定,須視勞工參與工會的比例高低及對手部門而定。不過可以肯定,聯合工會的出現,對消費者來說,不蒂是一項福音。本文乃啟發自國際工會運動事件,並由模型的結論之一可得到和現實世界一致的趨勢,雖然事實上遊說行為會比模型來的複雜許多,不過這個模型仍貼近真實世界,可得到相同的觀察。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 前言....................................................1
     第二章 文獻回顧................................................3
     第三章 模型設定................................................6
      第一節 消費面.............................................6
      第二節 生產面.............................................7
      第三節 工會...............................................7
      第四節 政府...............................................8
     第四章 遊說賽局................................................9
      第一節 兩廠商遊說政府....................................10
      第二節 廠商1和工會1遊說政府..............................12
      第三節 廠商2和工會2遊說政府..............................15
      第四節 廠商1和工會2遊說政府..............................17
      第五節 廠商2和工會1遊說政府..............................21
      第六節 廠商1和聯合工會遊說政府...........................25
      第七節 廠商2和聯合工會遊說政府...........................28
      第八節 小結..............................................31
     第五章 結論...................................................33
     附錄..........................................................36
     參考文獻......................................................74
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091255012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工會zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 遊說zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關稅保護zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 勞資遊說賽局與關稅保護模型zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翁永和、劉碧珍 (2001),「貿易政策、工會談判力與進口穿透 」,《人文及社會科學集刊》, 第十三卷, 第四期, 417 - 438 頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aidt, Toke S. (1997), Cooperative Lobbying and Endogenous Trade Policy, Public Choice, 93 (3-4), 455-475.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brander, J. A. and Spencer, B. J. (1988), Unionized Oligopoly and International Trade Policy, Journal of International Economics, 24, 217-234.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaston, Noel and Trefler, Daniel (1994b), Protection, Trade and Wages: Evidence for U.S. Manufacturing, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 574-593.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaston, Noel and Trefler, Daniel (1995), Union Wage Sensetivity to Trade and Protection: Theory and Evidence, Journal of International Economics, 39, 1-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldberg, Pinelopi K. and Maggi, Giovanni (1999), Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation, The American Economic Review, 89 (5), 1135-1155。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1994), Protection for Sale, The American Economic Review, 84 (4), 833-850.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1995), Trade Wars and Trade Talks, The Journal of Political Economy, 103 (4), 675-708.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1996), Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics, The Review of Economic Studies, 63 (2), 265-286.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hillman, Arye L. (1982), Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives, The American Economic Review, 72 (5), 1180-1187.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hillman, Arye L. and Ursprung Heinrich W. (1988), Domestic Politics, Foreign Interests, and International Trade Policy, The American Economic Review, 78 (4), 719-745.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Magee, Christopher (2002), Endogenous Trade Policy and Lobby Formation: An Application to the Free-Rider Problem, Journal of International Economics, 57, 449-471.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mezzetti, C. and Dinopoulos, E. (1991), Domestic Unionization and Import Competition, Journal of International Economics, 31, 79-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mitra, Devashish (1999), Endogenous Lobby Formation and Endogenous Protection: A Long Run Model of Trade Policy Determination, The American Economic Review, 89 (5), 1116-1134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mitra, Devashish (2002), Endogenous Political Organization and the Value of Trade Agreements, Journal of International Economics, 57, 473-485.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Panagariya, A. and R. Duttagupta (2002), Politics of Free Trade Areas: Tariffs versus Quotas, Journal of International Economics, 58, 413-427.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pecorino, Paul (1997), Exogenous Tariff Changes with an Endogenous Lobbying Response, Public Choice, 92, 91-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peltzman, Sam (1976), Toward a More General Theory of Regulation, Journal of Law and Economics, 19 (2), 211-240.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rama, Martin and Tabellini, Guido (1998), Lobbying by Capital and Labor over Trade and Labor Market Policies, European Economic Review, 42, 1295-1316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Riezman, Raymond and Wilson, John Douglas (1997), Political Reform and Trade Policy, Journal of International Economics, 42, 67-90.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stigler, George (1971), The Theory of Economic Regulation, Bell Journal of Economic Management and Science, 2, 3-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wallerstein, Michael (1987), Unemployment, Collective Bargaining, and the Demand for Protection, American Journal of Political Science, 31 (4), 729-752.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wang, Jue-Shyan, Hui-Wen Koo, and Tain-Jy Chen (2003), Resource Rivalry and Endogenous Lobby, working paper.zh_TW