Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 古蹟保存政策與再利用策略之研究
作者 林華苑
貢獻者 賴宗裕
林華苑
關鍵詞 古蹟保存政策
再利用
古蹟經營管理
文化資產保存法
Historical preservation policy
Reuse
Historical monument management
Cultural assets protection law
日期 2001
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 17:58:22 (UTC+8)
摘要 國內過往對於古蹟的保存手法,造成古蹟去生命化的後果,原因除了其忽視再利用面向之經營規劃外,純粹性的觀光政策也簡化了古蹟的社會文化功能。故 「再利用」一詞,於近幾年問被各界提出與熱烈討論,試圖去轉變「古蹟」的消極功能。但事實上,現今國內古蹟保存政策法令,在支援「再利用」此概念時,仍有不足之處。《文化資產保存法》自民國七十一年公佈施行以來,歷經四次之增訂修正,對古蹟保存之發展提供改善的空間。然而對於再利用工作,始終未能有突破性的規範,導致古蹟保存工作就在體制不全的情況下,未能積極發揮其角色所蘊含的意義。緣此,本研究旨在分析自四○年代以來,國內古蹟保存政策之歷程,隨著社經環境的變遷,瞭解現階段古蹟保存政策法令與經營管理上之不足,並擬議古蹟保存再利用之整體配套策略,提供當前古蹟保存政策之參考。
      首先,本研究藉由整理分析文獻資料與論述古蹟再利用之意義,進而依據時間序列,探討各階段之古蹟保存政策重點;並分別就行政、立法與社會結構面向,說明古蹟保存的當前困境。此外,藉由問卷調查方式,以釐清再利用機制應參酌的相關面向;並輔以個案調查訪談,以瞭解現行古蹟保存再利用工作之執行情形,作為研訂古蹟保存再利用策略之參考。最後,規劃古蹟保存再利用策略機制,確認古蹟保存再利用之目標,並建立再利用階段性策略,以對國內古蹟保存困境提出改善之道。
      本研究結果在現況課題解決方面,建議釐清再利用之定義、建立行政資源統籌部會與修正私有古蹟委託管理相關條文規定;在問卷調查與個案研究方面,發現私有古蹟衝突有待化解、保存誘因不足、欠缺公開透明的再利用經營管理審查機制與經營管理方式欠缺監督與彈性化之問題;另於再利用機制之配套法令方面,建議應提高再利用計畫之執行位階、釐清再利用、修復工程計畫與經營管理工作三者間的關係,並且規範管理再利用收益事項。本研究參酌問卷調查結果,研擬再利用策略之執行機制,在參與主體對象上,建議古蹟所有權人、政府機關與非營利組織之投入;在推動方式方面,建議以社區總體營造、公私合作與商圈再造方式進行;於再利用階段性策略上,共分為三階段:前置基礎階段建議進行古蹟調查研究,以建立完整的歷史資料庫;第二階段強調再利用計畫與修復工程建設的平行協調;第三階段進行古蹟經營管理維護計畫,建構古蹟經營管理機制。期以上述之建議與策略機制,對國內古蹟保存工作有所助益。
      關鍵字:古蹟保存政策、再利用、古蹟經營管理、文化資產保存法
As for the historical preservation in Taiwan, we overlook the fact that preservation is to "reuse" a historical monument by management and planning, and the tourism policy only focused on "one dimension@Tourism", which simplified the social and cultural functions of historical monuments. As a result, we fail to revitalize our historical monuments. The catchphrase "reuse", in an attempt to transform the passive function of historical monuments, has been the center of attention among communities in recent years. However, the laws regulating the protection of historical monuments are not fully supportive to the concept of "reuse". "Cultural Assets Protection Law" enacted in 1982, had undergone four revisions due to the need to improve the development of historical preservation. Even so, we hardly see any breakthrough of the laws for the works of "reuse". The current legal system fails to take an active role in terms of historical preservation. Concerning this, the thesis aims to analyze the development of historical preservation policies since 1951. With the changes of social and economic environments, we need to understand the insufficient respects of policies or regulations in terms of management in the current stage, and propose a set of compatible strategies as a reference to the policies of historical preservation.
      At the first stage, the thesis is to compile and analyze existing documents looking for the significance of reusing historical monuments. Furthermore, in a chronological order, it studies the measures and policies of historical preservation in different stages in order to draw a picture of the difficulties that have been encountered in administrative, legislative and, social structural levels. In addition, the supplement of questionnaires is to clarify different perspectives that should be considered in terms of "reuse". Also, this study provides with individual interviews of the execution of "reuse" mechanism, to further understand the current situation and to offer reference to the policy makers. In the end, the thesis offers a framework to achieve the "reuse" mechanism and to confirm the goals of both preservation and reuse. With the establishment of reuse policies in different stages, the thesis offers a solution to improve the current difficult situations.
      As to the solution of existing problems, the thesis suggests that we clarify the definition of "reuse", establish a department for the administrative management, and revise the articles as well as clauses regarding private historical monuments. From the questionnaires and case studies, we find problems like the conflicts of private historical monuments, the lack of incentive for preservation, the absence of a transparent mechanism for examining reuse management, the absence of the inflexibility and the supervision over the management. As to the laws related to reuse mechanism, we suggest to raise the priority of implementing reuse projects, clarify the relationship among reuse, monument-repair projects, and administrative works, as well as regulate and manage the profits from reuse projects. Based on the result of the questionnaires to frame the implementation mechanism of the reuse strategies, we suggest participation of reuse by the owner, government and the NPOs, and community empowerment, public-private partnership and commercial region reconstruction to set into action. There are three stages on reuse strategies. First, we recommend monuments investigation and studies to establish the complete database; second, strengthening the parallel relationship of reuse projects and monument-repair projects; third, executing monument management project and construct its mechanism Based on above strategies, we believe historical preservation would benefit.
      Keywords : Historical Preservation Policy Reuse Historical Monument Management Cultural Assets Protection Law
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
89257004
90
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCU3432012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 賴宗裕zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林華苑zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林華苑zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2001en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 17:58:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 17:58:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 17:58:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G91NCCU3432012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36318-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 89257004zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 國內過往對於古蹟的保存手法,造成古蹟去生命化的後果,原因除了其忽視再利用面向之經營規劃外,純粹性的觀光政策也簡化了古蹟的社會文化功能。故 「再利用」一詞,於近幾年問被各界提出與熱烈討論,試圖去轉變「古蹟」的消極功能。但事實上,現今國內古蹟保存政策法令,在支援「再利用」此概念時,仍有不足之處。《文化資產保存法》自民國七十一年公佈施行以來,歷經四次之增訂修正,對古蹟保存之發展提供改善的空間。然而對於再利用工作,始終未能有突破性的規範,導致古蹟保存工作就在體制不全的情況下,未能積極發揮其角色所蘊含的意義。緣此,本研究旨在分析自四○年代以來,國內古蹟保存政策之歷程,隨著社經環境的變遷,瞭解現階段古蹟保存政策法令與經營管理上之不足,並擬議古蹟保存再利用之整體配套策略,提供當前古蹟保存政策之參考。
      首先,本研究藉由整理分析文獻資料與論述古蹟再利用之意義,進而依據時間序列,探討各階段之古蹟保存政策重點;並分別就行政、立法與社會結構面向,說明古蹟保存的當前困境。此外,藉由問卷調查方式,以釐清再利用機制應參酌的相關面向;並輔以個案調查訪談,以瞭解現行古蹟保存再利用工作之執行情形,作為研訂古蹟保存再利用策略之參考。最後,規劃古蹟保存再利用策略機制,確認古蹟保存再利用之目標,並建立再利用階段性策略,以對國內古蹟保存困境提出改善之道。
      本研究結果在現況課題解決方面,建議釐清再利用之定義、建立行政資源統籌部會與修正私有古蹟委託管理相關條文規定;在問卷調查與個案研究方面,發現私有古蹟衝突有待化解、保存誘因不足、欠缺公開透明的再利用經營管理審查機制與經營管理方式欠缺監督與彈性化之問題;另於再利用機制之配套法令方面,建議應提高再利用計畫之執行位階、釐清再利用、修復工程計畫與經營管理工作三者間的關係,並且規範管理再利用收益事項。本研究參酌問卷調查結果,研擬再利用策略之執行機制,在參與主體對象上,建議古蹟所有權人、政府機關與非營利組織之投入;在推動方式方面,建議以社區總體營造、公私合作與商圈再造方式進行;於再利用階段性策略上,共分為三階段:前置基礎階段建議進行古蹟調查研究,以建立完整的歷史資料庫;第二階段強調再利用計畫與修復工程建設的平行協調;第三階段進行古蹟經營管理維護計畫,建構古蹟經營管理機制。期以上述之建議與策略機制,對國內古蹟保存工作有所助益。
      關鍵字:古蹟保存政策、再利用、古蹟經營管理、文化資產保存法
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) As for the historical preservation in Taiwan, we overlook the fact that preservation is to "reuse" a historical monument by management and planning, and the tourism policy only focused on "one dimension@Tourism", which simplified the social and cultural functions of historical monuments. As a result, we fail to revitalize our historical monuments. The catchphrase "reuse", in an attempt to transform the passive function of historical monuments, has been the center of attention among communities in recent years. However, the laws regulating the protection of historical monuments are not fully supportive to the concept of "reuse". "Cultural Assets Protection Law" enacted in 1982, had undergone four revisions due to the need to improve the development of historical preservation. Even so, we hardly see any breakthrough of the laws for the works of "reuse". The current legal system fails to take an active role in terms of historical preservation. Concerning this, the thesis aims to analyze the development of historical preservation policies since 1951. With the changes of social and economic environments, we need to understand the insufficient respects of policies or regulations in terms of management in the current stage, and propose a set of compatible strategies as a reference to the policies of historical preservation.
      At the first stage, the thesis is to compile and analyze existing documents looking for the significance of reusing historical monuments. Furthermore, in a chronological order, it studies the measures and policies of historical preservation in different stages in order to draw a picture of the difficulties that have been encountered in administrative, legislative and, social structural levels. In addition, the supplement of questionnaires is to clarify different perspectives that should be considered in terms of "reuse". Also, this study provides with individual interviews of the execution of "reuse" mechanism, to further understand the current situation and to offer reference to the policy makers. In the end, the thesis offers a framework to achieve the "reuse" mechanism and to confirm the goals of both preservation and reuse. With the establishment of reuse policies in different stages, the thesis offers a solution to improve the current difficult situations.
      As to the solution of existing problems, the thesis suggests that we clarify the definition of "reuse", establish a department for the administrative management, and revise the articles as well as clauses regarding private historical monuments. From the questionnaires and case studies, we find problems like the conflicts of private historical monuments, the lack of incentive for preservation, the absence of a transparent mechanism for examining reuse management, the absence of the inflexibility and the supervision over the management. As to the laws related to reuse mechanism, we suggest to raise the priority of implementing reuse projects, clarify the relationship among reuse, monument-repair projects, and administrative works, as well as regulate and manage the profits from reuse projects. Based on the result of the questionnaires to frame the implementation mechanism of the reuse strategies, we suggest participation of reuse by the owner, government and the NPOs, and community empowerment, public-private partnership and commercial region reconstruction to set into action. There are three stages on reuse strategies. First, we recommend monuments investigation and studies to establish the complete database; second, strengthening the parallel relationship of reuse projects and monument-repair projects; third, executing monument management project and construct its mechanism Based on above strategies, we believe historical preservation would benefit.
      Keywords : Historical Preservation Policy Reuse Historical Monument Management Cultural Assets Protection Law
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論-----1
      第一節 研究動機與目的-----1
      第二節 研究範圍與內容-----4
      第三節 研究方法與流程-----7
     
     第二章 古蹟保存再利用之論述與文獻回顧-----9
      第一節 古蹟保存再利用之論述-----9
      第二節 文獻回顧-----17
      第三節 國內外建築再利用案例介紹-----23
     
     第三章 古蹟保存政策制度之探討-----33
      第一節 古蹟保存政策制度之分析-----34
      第二節 古蹟保存再利用之探討-----49
      第三節 古蹟保存再利用之困境-----58
     
     第四章 問卷調查與個案研究-----73
      第一節 問卷調查研究-----73
      第二節 個案探討-----87
      第三節 綜合分析-----101
     
     第五章 古蹟保存再利用策略之規劃-----103
      第一節 古蹟保存再利用政策之規畫-----103
      第二節 古蹟保存再利用策略之研擬-----107
      第三節 政策法令與配套措施之建議-----118
     
     第六章 結論與建議-----123
      第一節 結論-----123
      第二節 後續研究之建議-----132
     
     
     參考文獻-----135
     附錄一 文資法歷年修正條文一覽表-----140
     附錄二 古蹟保存政策與再利用策略之問卷調查表-----145
     
     圖目錄
     圖1-1-1 研究流程圖-----8
     圖3-2-1 地方文史工作室團體屬性長條圖-----54
     圖3-3-1 古蹟修復流程圖-----62
     圖3-3-2 私有古蹟管理維護與權限爭議之示意圖-----65
     圖3-3-3 私有古蹟權益限制之示意圖-----67
     圖3-3-4 再利用與古蹟保存困境之介面連結圖-----69
     圖5-1-1 古蹟再利用效益關係圖-----105
     圖5-2-1 古蹟保存再利用之執行機制構想圖-----107
     圖5-2-2 古蹟保存再利用之階段性策略圖-----110
     
     
     表目錄
     表2-1-1 國際歷史保存觀念之變遷-----9
     表2-2-1 古蹟保存區劃設研究之相關文獻-----17
     表2-2-2 古蹟保存論述與保存政策之相關文獻-----18
     表2-2-3 古蹟保存相關課題解決之相關文獻-----20
     表2-2-4 古蹟保存再利用之相關文獻-----21
     表3-1-1 古蹟保存初期大事紀-----38
     表3-1-2 古蹟保存工作大事紀-----41
     表3-1-3 臺閩地區古蹟數量概況表-----43
     表3-1-4 臺閩地區古蹟類別概況表-----47
     表3-1-5 古蹟保存政策計畫一覽表-----47
     表3-1-6 文資法歷次修正重點內容一覽表-----48
     表3-2-1 古蹟再利用相關條文一覽表-----49
     表3-2-2 歷史建築再利用相闕條文一覽表-----51
     表3-3-1 古蹟保存計畫與都市計畫之關係表-----58
     表3-3-2 文化事權一覽表-----60
     表3-3-3 私有古蹟補助 、獎勵 、減免稅捐措施一覽表-----63
     表3-3-4 古蹟保存再利用契機與課題對應之概念表-----71
     表4-1-1 文化資產相關政策之調查表-----75
     表4-1-2 古蹟保存工作課題之調查表-----76
     表4-1-3 私有古蹟管理維護課題之調查表-----76
     表4-1-4 私有古蹟修復管理經費補助影響認同態度之調查表-----77
     表4-I-5 古蹟保存獎勵、補償性規定認知之調查表-----77
     表4-1-6 古蹟保存具實質獎勵或誘因項目之調查表-----78
     表4-1-7 古蹟保存規範是否具獎勵誘因之調查表-----78
     表4-1-8 古蹟委託管理維護辦法是否完備之調查表-----79
     表4-1-9 適當放寬規範可提高私有古蹟保存意願之調查表-----79
     表4-1-10 古蹟再利用偽古蹟保存策略方案認同態度之調查表-----80
     表4-1-11 古蹟保存再利用於社會層面意義之調查表-----80
     表4-1-12 古蹟保存再利用於經濟層面意義之調查表-----81
     表4-1-13 古蹟保存再利用於文化層面意義之調查表-----81
     表4-1-14 古蹟再利用可部分解決古蹟保存困境認同之調查表-----81
     表4-1-15 參與古蹟再利用對象之建議表-----82
     表4-1-16 推動古蹟再利用方式之調查表-----83
     表4-1-17 古蹟再利用策略面向之調查表-----83
     表4-1-18 古蹟再利用策略之綜理表-----85
     表4-2-1 永安居古蹟指定事件綜理表-----89
     表4-2-2 永安居經營管理決議過程一覽表-----94
     表4-3-1 深坑黃宅一覽表-----102
     表5-2-1 古蹟權屬與管理維護主體別一覽表-----108
     表5-2-2 再利用策略之執行機制操作表-----116
     
     
     照片目錄
     照片1 深坑黃氏永安居-----90
     照片2 深坑黃氏永安居遠觀-----90
     照片3 剪黏裝飾-----92
     照片4 石雕裝飾-----92
     照片5 銳眼內部-----93
     照片6 銳眼外部-----93
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCU3432012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 古蹟保存政策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 再利用zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 古蹟經營管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文化資產保存法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Historical preservation policyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Reuseen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Historical monument managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cultural assets protection lawen_US
dc.title (題名) 古蹟保存政策與再利用策略之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen