1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Communication
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 關於「cyborg」這個概念—一個「哈樂葳式（Harawayan）」的詮釋
作者 張自強
貢獻者 吳筱玫
張自強
關鍵詞 哈樂葳
cyborg
Haraway
日期 2004
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 18:47:38 (UTC+8)
摘要 這是一篇關於「cyborg」這個概念的Harawayan研究；同時，透過論文中五篇文章矛盾複雜的關係，間接地對論文思維、寫作與閱讀歷程進行cyborgian解構。
     
     本文藉由D. J. Haraway論述理路詮釋關於「cyborg」這個概念。透過拼貼混合Haraway諸多論述概念，我們建構一個「有名無實的」cyborg具相；在闡述cyborg這個概念的同時，我們也重構了Haraway的論述理路。
     
     除此之外，本文並非將cyborg體現為一種純粹的後設精神，我們必須把cyborg視為一種反身性人造主義式地顯相╱繞射╱模控式構成組合的過程╱結果，一種體現差異的污損實踐╱工具。因此，寄予所呈現出的「論文形式」作為一種體現差異的cyborgian對反政治體幹，透過如此表現方式進而打破統治性╱既有社會科學式論文形式的想像，同時也在此等書寫╱閱讀╱嬉戲過程中體現cyborg這個概念對論文形成過程儀式性物質化實踐的污損逾越。
參考文獻 一般文獻
李英明（2000）：《網路社會學》。臺北：揚智。
吳筱玫（2001.10）：〈賽伯人〉〔Online〕。網址：www.jour.nccu.edu.tw/SMWU/ nc/ch13.htm。
吳筱玫（2003）：《網路傳播概論》。臺北：智勝。
邱德亮（2001）：〈導讀：維希留加速2000年〉。收入於《消失的美學》，頁1-60。臺北：揚智。
林鬱主編（2001）：《尼采的智慧》。臺北：成陽。
黃金瑞（2000）：《歷史、身體、國家：近代中國的身體形成（1895—1937）》。臺北：聯經。
羅貴祥（1997）：《德勒茲》。臺北：東大。
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses: Note towards an investigation. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127-186). New York: Monthly Review Press.
Althusser, L. (1972). Montesquieu, Rousseau, Marx. London: Verso.
Badmington, N. (2000). Introduction: Approaching posthumanism. In N. Badmington (Ed.), Posthumanism (pp. 1-10). New York: Palgrave.
Menser, M. ＆ Aronowitz, S. (1996). On cultural studies, science, and technology. In S. Aronowitz, B. Martinsons, M. Menser ＆ J. Rich (Eds.), Technoscience and cyberculture (pp. 7-28). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Min-ha, T. T. (1986). Introduction to “She, the inappropriate/d other”. Discourse, 8: 1-9.
Min-ha, T. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Min-ha, T. T. (1998). Shifting the borders of the other: An interview with T. Min-ha [Online]. Available: http://www.telepolis.de/english/inhalt/kino/ 3265/1.html
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Morse, M. (1994). What do cyborgs eat? Oral logic in an information society. Discourse, 16(3): 86-123.
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74-89). Oxford: Blackwell.
Myerson, G. （2002 [2000]）：《唐娜•哈樂葳與基因改造食物》，吳秀瑾譯。臺北：貓頭鷹。
Parker, M. ＆ Cooper, R. (1998). Cyborganization: Cinema as nervous system. In J. Hassard ＆ R. Holliday (Eds.), Organization-representation: Work and organization in popular culture (pp. 201-228). London, Thousand Oaks ＆ New Delhi: Sage.
Pepperell, R. (1995). The post-human condition. England: Intellect Books.
Balsamo, A. (1995). Forms of technological embodiment: Reading the body in the contemporary culture. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodi- ment (pp. 215-237). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.
Pickering, A. (1992). From science as knowledge to science as practice. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 1-26). Chicago ＆ London: The University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, A. (2003). On becoming: Imagination, metaphysics, and the mangle. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 96-116). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Plant, S. (1996). The virtual complexity of culture. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 203-217). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Poster, M. (1996). Postmodern virtualities. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 183-202). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Prins, B. (1995). The ethics of hybrids subjects: Feminist constructivism according to Donna Haraway. Science, technology, ＆ human values, 20(3): 352-367.
Sandoval, C. (1995). New sciences: Cyborg feminism and the methodology of the oppressed. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 407-421). New York: Routledge.
Schrift, A. D. (1994 [1988]). Foucault and Derrida on Nietzsche and the end(s) of ‘man’. In B. Smart (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Critical assessments (vol. 2) (pp. 278-292). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Slouka, M. （1998 [1995]）：《虛擬入侵：網際空間與科技對現實之衝擊》，張義東譯。臺北：遠流。
Balsamo, A. (1996). Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Durham ＆ London: Duke University Press.
Sofoulis, Z. (1988). Through the lumen: Frankenstein and the optics of re-origination. University of California at Santa Cruz, PhD Thesis.
Sofoulis, Z. (2002). Cyberquake: Haraway’s manifesto. In A. Jonson ＆ A. Cavallaro (Eds.), Prefiguring cyberculture: An intellectual history (pp. 84-103). Cambridge, Massachusetts ＆ London: The MIT Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson ＆ L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana ＆ Chicago: Illinois University Press.
Suleiman, S. R. (Ed.) (1985). The female body in western culture: Contemporary perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Strathern, M. (1991). Partial connections. Savage Maryland: Rowman ＆ Littlefield.
Terranova, T. (1996). Posthuman unbounded: Artificial evolution and high-tech subcultures. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 165-180). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Tirado, F. J. (1999). Against social constructionist cyborgian territorializations. In Á. J. Gordo-López ＆ I. Parker (Eds.), Cyberpsychology (pp. 202-217). London: Macmillam.
Tirado, F. J., Alcaraz, J. M. ＆ Domènech, M. (1999). A change of episteme for organizations: A lesson from Solaris. Organization, 6(4): 673-690.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tuana, N. (2003 [1996]). Revaluing science: Starting from the practices of women. In R. C. Scharff ＆ V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition: An anthology (pp. 116-125). Oxford: Blackwell.
Balsamo, A. (2000 [1988]). Reading cyborgs writing feminism. In G. Kirkup, L. Janes, K. Woodward ＆ F. Hovenden (Eds.), The gendered cyborg: The reader (pp. 148-158). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Turkle, S. （1998 [1996]）：《虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同》，譚天、吳佳真譯。臺北：遠流。
Turner, B. S. (1996). The body and society (2nd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks ＆ New Delhi: Sage.
Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African logical. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vološino, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.
Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction: The theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. London ＆ New York: Methuen.
Weber, M. （2001 [1976]）：《新教倫理與資本主義精神》，于曉等譯。臺北：左岸。
Whitehead, A. N. （2000 [1925]）：《科學與現代世界》，傅佩榮譯。臺北：立緒。
Wilson, R. R. (1995). Cyber(body)part: Prosthetic consciousness. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 239-259). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.
Wise, J. M. (1997). Exploring technology and social space. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Yi, D. (2004). Toward a posthuman ethics [Online]. Available: http://www. reconstruction.ws/043/yi.htm
Bartsch, I., DiPalma, C. ＆ Sells, L. (2001). Witnessing the postmodern jeremiad: (Mis)Understanding Donna Haraway’s method of inquiry. Configurations, 9: 127-164.
小說
洪凌（1995）：〈純真罪刑〉。收入於《肢解異獸》（頁23-46）。臺北：遠流。
Ballard, J. G. （2003 [1973]）：《超速性追緝》，張馨濤譯。臺北：商周。
Fleischer, L. （1995 [1994]）：《瑪麗雪萊之科學怪人》，朱乃長譯。臺北：映象文化。
漫畫
士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1991）：《攻殼機動隊（中文珍藏版）》。臺北：東立。
士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1996-1999）：《攻殼機動隊（1-2）》，張偉任譯。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1997）：《攻殼機動隊（全）》，Arashi譯。臺北：尚登。
木城ゆきと（Yukito Kishiro）（1993-1995）：《銃Gunnm夢（1-9）》，林上園、洪瓊容譯。臺北：東立。
電影
Bell, D. (2001). An introduction to cybercultures. London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Cronenberg, D.（1996）：《超速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。
圖片
士郎正宗（1996）：〈學習課程〉，《攻殼機動隊（1）》，頁21-22。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1996）：〈靈魂複製〉，《攻殼機動隊（1）》，頁136。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1997）：〈靈魂入侵〉，《攻殼機動隊（全）》，頁34。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1997）：〈毀滅原初〉，《攻殼機動隊（全）》，頁209。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1999）：〈草薙素子〉，《攻殼機動隊（2）》封底。臺北：尖端。
士郎正宗（1999）：〈融合〉，《攻殼機動隊（2）》，頁150。臺北：尖端。
木城ゆきと（1994）：〈凱麗及其朋友〉，《銃Gunnm夢（7）》，頁26-27。臺北：尖端。
木城ゆきと（1995）：〈授勳儀式〉，《銃Gunnm夢（9）》，頁14-21。臺北：尖端。
Benjamin, W. (1969). Theses on the philosophy of history. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 253-264). New York: Schocken Books.
木城ゆきと（1995）：〈對自核夢〉，《銃Gunnm夢（9）》，頁54-107。臺北：尖端。
木城ゆきと(1996). Angel of Space [Online]. Available: http://jajatom.moo.jp/ E-top/Egunnm/gunnmCGgallery%20folder/g.gallery01.html
木城ゆきと (2001). Air Hole [Online]. Available: http://jajatom.moo.jp/E-top/ Egunnm/gunnmLO02/g.gallery01.html
Cronenberg, D. （1996）：〈慾望的孔洞〉，《急速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。
Cronenberg, D. （1996）：〈撞車〉，《急速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。
Durer, A. (1512). Ecce Homo [Online]. Available: http://www.conncoll.edu/ visual/Durer-prints/engravedpassion.all/web/box%2027-10.jpg
Eglash, R. (2000). Cultural Cybernetics [Online]. Available: http://www.rpi. edu/~eglash/eglash.dir/cyb/cultcyb.dir/hands.htm
Hoch, H. (1920). The pretty maiden [Online]. Available: http://www. msubillings.edu/art/Dada.htm
Klee, P. (1910). Angelus novus [Online]. Available: http://www.remue.net/ cont/benjamin.html
Randolph, L. M. (1989). Cyborg [Online]. Available: http://www.lynnrandolph. com/cyborgFrameset.html
Berman, M. (1982). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Randolph, L. M. (1989). Self consortium [Online]. Available: http://herbergercollege.asu.edu/museum/randolph/rand1.jpg
Randolph, L. M. (1992). Diffraction [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/shapeS.html
Randolph, L. M. (1995). The annunciation of the second coming [Online]. Available: http://www.lynnrandolph.com/cyborgFrameset.html
Randolph, L. M. (1996). Managed care [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/cyborgFrameset.html
Randolph, L. M. (1997-1998). Mystery [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/mysteries.html
Braidotti, R. (1994a). Toward a new nomadism: Feminist Deleuzian tracks; or, metaphysics and metabolism. In C. V. Boundas ＆ D. Olkowski (Eds.), Gilles Deleuze and the theater of philosophy (pp. 159-186). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (1994b). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (1996). Cyberfeminism with a difference [Online]. Available: http://www.let.uu.nl/womens_studies/rosi/cyberfem.htm
Braidotti, R. (2000). Between the no longer and the not yet: Nomadic variations on the body [Online]. Available: http://www.women.it/quarta/ plenary/ braidotti.htm
Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity.
Bukatman, S. (1993). Terminal identity: The virtual subject in postmodern science fiction. Durham ＆ London: Duke University Press.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York & London: Routledge.
de Certeau. M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, Los Angeles ＆ London: University of California Press.
Chow, R. (1992 [1990]). Postmodern automatons. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 101-117). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Cixous, H. （2001 [1976]）：〈美杜莎的笑聲〉，吳芬等譯。收入於《誰是第二性？》，頁591-620。臺北：貓頭鷹。
Clynes, M. E. ＆ Kline, N. S. (1995 [1960]). Cyborgs and space. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 29-33). New York: Routledge.
Cooper, R. ＆ Law, J. (1995). Organization: Distal and proximal views. Research in the sociology of organizations, 13:237-274.
Crenshaw, K. (1993). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminism theory, and antiracist politics. In D. K. Kelly (Ed.), Feminist Legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383-395). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Crewe, J. (1997). Transcoding the world: Haraway’s postmodernism. Sings: Journal of women in culture and society, 22(4): 891-905.
Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W. ＆ Francis, D. W. （1999 [1998]）：《社會學理論的觀點》，林秀麗、林庭瑤、洪惠芬譯。臺北：韋伯。
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Derrida, J. (1978a). Writing and difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (1978b). Spurs: Nietzsche’s styles. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Downwy, G. L., Dumit, J. ＆ Williams, S. (1995). Cyborg anthropology. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 341-346). New York: Routledge.
Dumit, J. ＆ Davis-Floyd, R. (1998). Cyborg babies: Children of the third millennium. In R. Davis-Floyd ＆ J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots (pp. 1-18). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Escobar, K. (2000). Welcome to cyberia: Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. In D. Bell ＆ B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 56-76). London: Routledge.
Everard, J. (2000). Virtual states: The internet and the boundaries of the nation-state. London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Featherstone, M & Burrow, R. (1995). Cultures of technological embodiment: An Introduction. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/ cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 1-19). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.
Feher, M. (1987). Of bodies and technology. In H. Foster (Ed.), Discussions in contemporary culture (pp. 159-165). Seattle ＆ Washington: Bay.
Flax, J. (1992). The end of innocence. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 445-463). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus ＆ P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.) (pp. 208-226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1994 [1966]). The order of things: The archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Book.
Foucault, M. (1997a [1982]). Technologies of the self. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 221-251). New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (1997b). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 303-319). New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (1998 [1970]). What is an author? In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (pp. 205-222). New York: The New Press.
Gaggioli, A., Vettorello, M ＆ Riva, G. (2003). From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine. PsychNology Journal, 1(2): 75-86.
Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.
González, J. (1995). Envisioning cyborg bodies: Notes from current research. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 267-279). New York: Routledge.
Grassie, W. (1996). Cyborgs, trickster, and Hermes: Donna Haraway’s metatheory of science and religion [Online]. Available: http://www. users.voicenet.com/~grassie/Fldr.Articles/Cyborgs.html
Gray, C. H. ＆ Mentor, S. (1995). The cyborg body politics and the new world order. In G. Brahm JR. ＆ M. Driscoll (eds.), Prosthetic territories: Politics and hypertechnologies (pp. 219-247). Boulder, San Francisco ＆ Oxford: Westview Press.
Gray, C. H., Mentor, S. ＆ Figueroa-Sarriera, H. J. (1995). Cyborology: Constructing the knowledge of cybernetic organisms. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 1-16). New York: Routledge.
Gray, C. H. (2001). Cyborg citizen: Politics in the posthuman age. New York and London: Routledge.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gunkel, D. (2000). We are borg: Cyborgs and the subject of communication. Communication theory, 10(3): 332-357.
Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgs@cyberspace? An ethnographer looks to the future. New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Hall, S. （1994 [1982]）：〈「意識型態」的再發現：媒體研究中被壓抑者的重返〉，黃麗玲譯。收入於《文化、社會與媒體：批判性觀點》（M. Gurevitch、T. Bennett、J. Curran ＆ J. Woollacott, Eds.），頁73-122。臺北：遠流。
Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991a). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991b). ‘Gender’ for a Marxist dictionary: The sexual politics of a word. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 127-148). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991c). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149-181). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991d). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183-201). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991e). The biopolitics of postmodern bodies: Constitutions of self in immune system discourse. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 203-230). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991f). Cyborg at large: Interview with Donna Haraway. In C. Penley ＆ A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 1-20). Minneapolis ＆ Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991g). The actors are cyborg, nature is coyote, and the geography is elsewhere: Postscript to “Cyborg at large”. In C. Penley ＆ A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 21-26). Minneapolis ＆ Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1992a [1989]). Ecce homo, ain’t (ar’n’t) I a woman, and inappropriate/d others: The human in a post-humanist landscape. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 86-100). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1992b). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossber, C. Nelson ＆ P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1995). Cyborg and symbionts: Living together in the new world order. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. xi-xx). New York: Routledge.
Haraway,D.J.(1997).Modest_witness@second_millennium.femalman©_meets_oncomouse™: Feminism and technoscience. New York ＆ London：Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2000). How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2003). Cyborgs to companion species: Reconfiguring kinship in technoscience. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 58-82). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Haraway, D. J. (2004 [1992]). Otherworldly conversations; terran topics; local terms. In The Haraway reader (pp. 125-150). New York ＆ London: Routledge.
Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Towards a posthumanism culture. In M. Benamou ＆ C. Caramella (Eds.), Performance in modern change . Madison: Coda Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we become posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago ＆ London: The University of Chicago Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper ＆ Row.
Hoofd, I. (2002). Cyborg manifesto 2.0: Discussions in feminist figurations, new technologies and social change [Online]. Available: http://www. cyberartsweb.org/cpace/theory/hoofd/index.html
Honneth, A. (1995). Decentered autonomy: The subject after the fall. In C. W. Wright (Ed.), The fragmented world of the social: Essays in social and political philosophy (pp. 261-271). New York: State University of New York Press.
Jensen, C. B. (2003). Latour and Pickering: Post-human perspectives on science, becoming, and normativity. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 225-240). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Kember, S. (1996). Feminist figuration and the question of origin. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 256-269). London ＆ New York: Routledge.
Kember, S. (1998). Virtual anxiety: Photography, new technologies and subjectivity. Manchester ＆ New York: Manchester University Press.
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J, Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264-280). London, Boston ＆ Henley: Routledge ＆ Kegan Paul.
Latour, B. (1993 [1991]). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo ＆ Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15-25). Oxford: Blackwell.
de Lauretis, Teresa. (1987). Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes ＆ T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technical systems: New Directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111-134). Cambridge ＆ Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Law, J. (1992). Note on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/ sociology/papers/law-Notes-on-ANT.pdf
Law, J. (1997). Heterogeneities [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac. uk/sociology/papers/Law-Heterogeneities.pdf
Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, J. (2000). Networks, relations, cyborgs: On the social study of technology [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/ papers/Law-Networks-Relations-Cyborgs.pdf
Law, J. (2004). Enacting naturecultures: A note from STS [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-enacting-naturecultures.pdf
van Loon, J. (1996). Technological sensibilities and the cyberpolitics of gender: Donna Haraway’s postmodern feminism. Innovation: The European journal of social sciences, 9(2): 231-243.
Luke, T. W. (2001). Reconstructing nature: How the new informatics are rewrighting the environment and society as bitspace. Capitalism, nature, socialism, 12(3): 3-27.
Lykke, N. (1996). Between monsters, goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science. In N. Lykke ＆ R. Braidotti (Eds.), Between monsters, goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science, medicine and cyberspace (pp. 13-29). London ＆ New Jersey: Zed Books.
Lyotard, J-F. （2001 [1988]）：《非人：時間漫談》，羅國祥譯。北京：商務。
Mackenzie, D. ＆ Wajcman, J. (1999). Introductory essay: The social shaping of the technology. In D. Mackenzie ＆ J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of the technology (pp. 3-27). Buckingham ＆ Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Marcuse, H. (1997 [1964])：〈從共識型態到工具性控制〉，林明澤譯。收入於《文化與社會：當代論辯》（J. C. Alexander ＆ S. Seidman, Eds.），頁329-339。臺北：立緒。
Mason, C. (1995). Terminating bodies: Toward a cyborg history of abortion. In J. Halberstam ＆ I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman bodies (pp. 225-243). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
90451003
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0904510031
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳筱玫zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張自強zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 張自強zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 18:47:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 18:47:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 18:47:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0904510031en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36530-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90451003zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 這是一篇關於「cyborg」這個概念的Harawayan研究；同時，透過論文中五篇文章矛盾複雜的關係，間接地對論文思維、寫作與閱讀歷程進行cyborgian解構。
     
     本文藉由D. J. Haraway論述理路詮釋關於「cyborg」這個概念。透過拼貼混合Haraway諸多論述概念，我們建構一個「有名無實的」cyborg具相；在闡述cyborg這個概念的同時，我們也重構了Haraway的論述理路。
     
     除此之外，本文並非將cyborg體現為一種純粹的後設精神，我們必須把cyborg視為一種反身性人造主義式地顯相╱繞射╱模控式構成組合的過程╱結果，一種體現差異的污損實踐╱工具。因此，寄予所呈現出的「論文形式」作為一種體現差異的cyborgian對反政治體幹，透過如此表現方式進而打破統治性╱既有社會科學式論文形式的想像，同時也在此等書寫╱閱讀╱嬉戲過程中體現cyborg這個概念對論文形成過程儀式性物質化實踐的污損逾越。		zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第二千禧年的唯實具相 01
      純真的終結 01
      天主教式聖餐儀式 02
      第二千禧年的時空標的 06
      註釋 09
     
     後人（類）紀元 11
      主體已死—人（類）存在的技術 11
      後人（類）主義—人之「初」與人之「後」 14
      體幹的技術與技術體幹 17
      後人（類）體現（1）—浮現式演化 21
      後人（類）體現（2）—後人（類）狀態 25
      後人（類）體現（3）—cyborg 28
      後人（類）體現（4）—積體電路中的人（類） 33
      後人（類）體現（5）—cyborg意識與政治策略 36
      註釋 41
     
     Cyborg思維 43
      當過去所有定局都將煙消雲散時∼ 43
      視野的處境性與cyborg作為非同構態的物質—符義行動 48
      註釋 55
     
     Cyborg書寫與實作 56
      後人（類）狀態≠技術科學的救贖神話 56
      連結需求：統治資訊學下的後人狀態 61
      cyborg政治體幹：不適切╱不被挪用的他者實踐 64
      褻瀆的啟發：非同構態物質—符義的行動實踐 71
      註釋 76
     
     關於「cyborg」這個概念 79
      cyborg作為一種「遲╱疑」的體現 79
      註釋 84
     
     參考文獻 85
      一般文獻 85
      小說 95
      漫畫 95
      電影 96
      圖片 96
     
     附錄 98
      附錄一：《攻殼機動隊》故事大綱 98
      附錄二：《銃夢》故事大綱 107
     
     圖表目錄
     
     表
     表一：兩種不同科學和技術緊密相連的社會關係 34
     表二：後人（類）紀元的cyborg思維 51
     
     圖
     圖1 ：Cultural Cybernetics 01
     圖2 ：Ecce Homo 03
     圖3 ：The Annunciation of the Second Coming 07
     圖4 ：Cyborg 07
     圖5 ：Angel of Space 11
     圖6 ：The Pretty Maiden 12
     圖7 ：Managed Care 19
     圖8 ：後人（類）紀元的浮現式演化 24
     圖9 ：草薙素子 28
     圖10：Self Consortium 32
     圖11：Diffraction 38
     圖12：Mystery 43
     圖13：Cyborgian 知識型 44
     圖14：Air Hole 49
     圖15：統治模控式構成組合 53
     圖16：抵抗模控式構成組合 53
     圖17：非現代構成後設思維的流動拓樸 54
     圖18：Angelus Novus 56
     圖19：學習課程 61
     圖20：靈魂入侵 62
     圖21：靈魂複製 62
     圖22：授勳儀式 63
     圖23：毀滅原初 65
     圖24：融合 66
     圖25：凱麗及其朋友 68
     圖26：對自核夢 69
     圖27：慾望的孔洞 72
     圖28：撞車 74
     圖29：論文架構示意圖 80
     圖30：「遲╱疑」示意圖 81		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0904510031en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 哈樂葳zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) cyborgen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Harawayen_US
dc.title (題名) 關於「cyborg」這個概念—一個「哈樂葳式（Harawayan）」的詮釋zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一般文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李英明（2000）：《網路社會學》。臺北：揚智。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳筱玫（2001.10）：〈賽伯人〉〔Online〕。網址：www.jour.nccu.edu.tw/SMWU/ nc/ch13.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳筱玫（2003）：《網路傳播概論》。臺北：智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱德亮（2001）：〈導讀：維希留加速2000年〉。收入於《消失的美學》，頁1-60。臺北：揚智。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林鬱主編（2001）：《尼采的智慧》。臺北：成陽。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃金瑞（2000）：《歷史、身體、國家：近代中國的身體形成（1895—1937）》。臺北：聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅貴祥（1997）：《德勒茲》。臺北：東大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses: Note towards an investigation. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127-186). New York: Monthly Review Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Althusser, L. (1972). Montesquieu, Rousseau, Marx. London: Verso.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Badmington, N. (2000). Introduction: Approaching posthumanism. In N. Badmington (Ed.), Posthumanism (pp. 1-10). New York: Palgrave.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Menser, M. ＆ Aronowitz, S. (1996). On cultural studies, science, and technology. In S. Aronowitz, B. Martinsons, M. Menser ＆ J. Rich (Eds.), Technoscience and cyberculture (pp. 7-28). New York ＆ London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Min-ha, T. T. (1986). Introduction to “She, the inappropriate/d other”. Discourse, 8: 1-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Min-ha, T. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Min-ha, T. T. (1998). Shifting the borders of the other: An interview with T. Min-ha [Online]. Available: http://www.telepolis.de/english/inhalt/kino/ 3265/1.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morse, M. (1994). What do cyborgs eat? Oral logic in an information society. Discourse, 16(3): 86-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74-89). Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myerson, G. （2002 [2000]）：《唐娜•哈樂葳與基因改造食物》，吳秀瑾譯。臺北：貓頭鷹。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Parker, M. ＆ Cooper, R. (1998). Cyborganization: Cinema as nervous system. In J. Hassard ＆ R. Holliday (Eds.), Organization-representation: Work and organization in popular culture (pp. 201-228). London, Thousand Oaks ＆ New Delhi: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pepperell, R. (1995). The post-human condition. England: Intellect Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Balsamo, A. (1995). Forms of technological embodiment: Reading the body in the contemporary culture. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodi- ment (pp. 215-237). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pickering, A. (1992). From science as knowledge to science as practice. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 1-26). Chicago ＆ London: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pickering, A. (2003). On becoming: Imagination, metaphysics, and the mangle. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 96-116). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Plant, S. (1996). The virtual complexity of culture. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 203-217). London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Poster, M. (1996). Postmodern virtualities. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 183-202). London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prins, B. (1995). The ethics of hybrids subjects: Feminist constructivism according to Donna Haraway. Science, technology, ＆ human values, 20(3): 352-367.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sandoval, C. (1995). New sciences: Cyborg feminism and the methodology of the oppressed. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 407-421). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schrift, A. D. (1994 [1988]). Foucault and Derrida on Nietzsche and the end(s) of ‘man’. In B. Smart (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Critical assessments (vol. 2) (pp. 278-292). London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slouka, M. （1998 [1995]）：《虛擬入侵：網際空間與科技對現實之衝擊》，張義東譯。臺北：遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Balsamo, A. (1996). Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Durham ＆ London: Duke University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sofoulis, Z. (1988). Through the lumen: Frankenstein and the optics of re-origination. University of California at Santa Cruz, PhD Thesis.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sofoulis, Z. (2002). Cyberquake: Haraway’s manifesto. In A. Jonson ＆ A. Cavallaro (Eds.), Prefiguring cyberculture: An intellectual history (pp. 84-103). Cambridge, Massachusetts ＆ London: The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson ＆ L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana ＆ Chicago: Illinois University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suleiman, S. R. (Ed.) (1985). The female body in western culture: Contemporary perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strathern, M. (1991). Partial connections. Savage Maryland: Rowman ＆ Littlefield.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Terranova, T. (1996). Posthuman unbounded: Artificial evolution and high-tech subcultures. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 165-180). London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tirado, F. J. (1999). Against social constructionist cyborgian territorializations. In Á. J. Gordo-López ＆ I. Parker (Eds.), Cyberpsychology (pp. 202-217). London: Macmillam.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tirado, F. J., Alcaraz, J. M. ＆ Domènech, M. (1999). A change of episteme for organizations: A lesson from Solaris. Organization, 6(4): 673-690.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tuana, N. (2003 [1996]). Revaluing science: Starting from the practices of women. In R. C. Scharff ＆ V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition: An anthology (pp. 116-125). Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Balsamo, A. (2000 [1988]). Reading cyborgs writing feminism. In G. Kirkup, L. Janes, K. Woodward ＆ F. Hovenden (Eds.), The gendered cyborg: The reader (pp. 148-158). London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Turkle, S. （1998 [1996]）：《虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同》，譚天、吳佳真譯。臺北：遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Turner, B. S. (1996). The body and society (2nd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks ＆ New Delhi: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African logical. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vološino, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction: The theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. London ＆ New York: Methuen.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weber, M. （2001 [1976]）：《新教倫理與資本主義精神》，于曉等譯。臺北：左岸。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Whitehead, A. N. （2000 [1925]）：《科學與現代世界》，傅佩榮譯。臺北：立緒。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson, R. R. (1995). Cyber(body)part: Prosthetic consciousness. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 239-259). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wise, J. M. (1997). Exploring technology and social space. Thousand Oaks: Sagezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yi, D. (2004). Toward a posthuman ethics [Online]. Available: http://www. reconstruction.ws/043/yi.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bartsch, I., DiPalma, C. ＆ Sells, L. (2001). Witnessing the postmodern jeremiad: (Mis)Understanding Donna Haraway’s method of inquiry. Configurations, 9: 127-164.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 小說zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪凌（1995）：〈純真罪刑〉。收入於《肢解異獸》（頁23-46）。臺北：遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ballard, J. G. （2003 [1973]）：《超速性追緝》，張馨濤譯。臺北：商周。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fleischer, L. （1995 [1994]）：《瑪麗雪萊之科學怪人》，朱乃長譯。臺北：映象文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 漫畫zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1991）：《攻殼機動隊（中文珍藏版）》。臺北：東立。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1996-1999）：《攻殼機動隊（1-2）》，張偉任譯。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（Masamune Sirow）（1997）：《攻殼機動隊（全）》，Arashi譯。臺北：尚登。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 木城ゆきと（Yukito Kishiro）（1993-1995）：《銃Gunnm夢（1-9）》，林上園、洪瓊容譯。臺北：東立。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 電影zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bell, D. (2001). An introduction to cybercultures. London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cronenberg, D.（1996）：《超速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 圖片zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（1996）：〈學習課程〉，《攻殼機動隊（1）》，頁21-22。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（1996）：〈靈魂複製〉，《攻殼機動隊（1）》，頁136。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（1997）：〈靈魂入侵〉，《攻殼機動隊（全）》，頁34。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（1997）：〈毀滅原初〉，《攻殼機動隊（全）》，頁209。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（1999）：〈草薙素子〉，《攻殼機動隊（2）》封底。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 士郎正宗（1999）：〈融合〉，《攻殼機動隊（2）》，頁150。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 木城ゆきと（1994）：〈凱麗及其朋友〉，《銃Gunnm夢（7）》，頁26-27。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 木城ゆきと（1995）：〈授勳儀式〉，《銃Gunnm夢（9）》，頁14-21。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benjamin, W. (1969). Theses on the philosophy of history. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 253-264). New York: Schocken Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 木城ゆきと（1995）：〈對自核夢〉，《銃Gunnm夢（9）》，頁54-107。臺北：尖端。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 木城ゆきと(1996). Angel of Space [Online]. Available: http://jajatom.moo.jp/ E-top/Egunnm/gunnmCGgallery%20folder/g.gallery01.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 木城ゆきと (2001). Air Hole [Online]. Available: http://jajatom.moo.jp/E-top/ Egunnm/gunnmLO02/g.gallery01.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cronenberg, D. （1996）：〈慾望的孔洞〉，《急速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cronenberg, D. （1996）：〈撞車〉，《急速性追緝》。臺灣：龍祥。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Durer, A. (1512). Ecce Homo [Online]. Available: http://www.conncoll.edu/ visual/Durer-prints/engravedpassion.all/web/box%2027-10.jpgzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eglash, R. (2000). Cultural Cybernetics [Online]. Available: http://www.rpi. edu/~eglash/eglash.dir/cyb/cultcyb.dir/hands.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoch, H. (1920). The pretty maiden [Online]. Available: http://www. msubillings.edu/art/Dada.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Klee, P. (1910). Angelus novus [Online]. Available: http://www.remue.net/ cont/benjamin.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Randolph, L. M. (1989). Cyborg [Online]. Available: http://www.lynnrandolph. com/cyborgFrameset.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berman, M. (1982). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Simon and Schuster.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Randolph, L. M. (1989). Self consortium [Online]. Available: http://herbergercollege.asu.edu/museum/randolph/rand1.jpgzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Randolph, L. M. (1992). Diffraction [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/shapeS.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Randolph, L. M. (1995). The annunciation of the second coming [Online]. Available: http://www.lynnrandolph.com/cyborgFrameset.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Randolph, L. M. (1996). Managed care [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/cyborgFrameset.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Randolph, L. M. (1997-1998). Mystery [Online]. Available: http://www. lynnrandolph.com/mysteries.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braidotti, R. (1994a). Toward a new nomadism: Feminist Deleuzian tracks; or, metaphysics and metabolism. In C. V. Boundas ＆ D. Olkowski (Eds.), Gilles Deleuze and the theater of philosophy (pp. 159-186). New York ＆ London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braidotti, R. (1994b). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braidotti, R. (1996). Cyberfeminism with a difference [Online]. Available: http://www.let.uu.nl/womens_studies/rosi/cyberfem.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braidotti, R. (2000). Between the no longer and the not yet: Nomadic variations on the body [Online]. Available: http://www.women.it/quarta/ plenary/ braidotti.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bukatman, S. (1993). Terminal identity: The virtual subject in postmodern science fiction. Durham ＆ London: Duke University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York & London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) de Certeau. M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, Los Angeles ＆ London: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chow, R. (1992 [1990]). Postmodern automatons. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 101-117). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cixous, H. （2001 [1976]）：〈美杜莎的笑聲〉，吳芬等譯。收入於《誰是第二性？》，頁591-620。臺北：貓頭鷹。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clynes, M. E. ＆ Kline, N. S. (1995 [1960]). Cyborgs and space. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 29-33). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, R. ＆ Law, J. (1995). Organization: Distal and proximal views. Research in the sociology of organizations, 13:237-274.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Crenshaw, K. (1993). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminism theory, and antiracist politics. In D. K. Kelly (Ed.), Feminist Legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383-395). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Crewe, J. (1997). Transcoding the world: Haraway’s postmodernism. Sings: Journal of women in culture and society, 22(4): 891-905.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W. ＆ Francis, D. W. （1999 [1998]）：《社會學理論的觀點》，林秀麗、林庭瑤、洪惠芬譯。臺北：韋伯。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Derrida, J. (1978a). Writing and difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Derrida, J. (1978b). Spurs: Nietzsche’s styles. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Downwy, G. L., Dumit, J. ＆ Williams, S. (1995). Cyborg anthropology. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 341-346). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dumit, J. ＆ Davis-Floyd, R. (1998). Cyborg babies: Children of the third millennium. In R. Davis-Floyd ＆ J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots (pp. 1-18). New York ＆ London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Escobar, K. (2000). Welcome to cyberia: Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. In D. Bell ＆ B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 56-76). London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Everard, J. (2000). Virtual states: The internet and the boundaries of the nation-state. London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Featherstone, M & Burrow, R. (1995). Cultures of technological embodiment: An Introduction. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/ cyberbodies/cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 1-19). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feher, M. (1987). Of bodies and technology. In H. Foster (Ed.), Discussions in contemporary culture (pp. 159-165). Seattle ＆ Washington: Bay.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flax, J. (1992). The end of innocence. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 445-463). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus ＆ P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.) (pp. 208-226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, M. (1994 [1966]). The order of things: The archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Book.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, M. (1997a [1982]). Technologies of the self. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 221-251). New York: The New Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, M. (1997b). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 303-319). New York: The New Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, M. (1998 [1970]). What is an author? In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (pp. 205-222). New York: The New Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaggioli, A., Vettorello, M ＆ Riva, G. (2003). From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine. PsychNology Journal, 1(2): 75-86.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) González, J. (1995). Envisioning cyborg bodies: Notes from current research. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 267-279). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grassie, W. (1996). Cyborgs, trickster, and Hermes: Donna Haraway’s metatheory of science and religion [Online]. Available: http://www. users.voicenet.com/~grassie/Fldr.Articles/Cyborgs.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gray, C. H. ＆ Mentor, S. (1995). The cyborg body politics and the new world order. In G. Brahm JR. ＆ M. Driscoll (eds.), Prosthetic territories: Politics and hypertechnologies (pp. 219-247). Boulder, San Francisco ＆ Oxford: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gray, C. H., Mentor, S. ＆ Figueroa-Sarriera, H. J. (1995). Cyborology: Constructing the knowledge of cybernetic organisms. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 1-16). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gray, C. H. (2001). Cyborg citizen: Politics in the posthuman age. New York and London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gunkel, D. (2000). We are borg: Cyborgs and the subject of communication. Communication theory, 10(3): 332-357.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgs@cyberspace? An ethnographer looks to the future. New York ＆ London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, S. （1994 [1982]）：〈「意識型態」的再發現：媒體研究中被壓抑者的重返〉，黃麗玲譯。收入於《文化、社會與媒體：批判性觀點》（M. Gurevitch、T. Bennett、J. Curran ＆ J. Woollacott, Eds.），頁73-122。臺北：遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1991a). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1991b). ‘Gender’ for a Marxist dictionary: The sexual politics of a word. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 127-148). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1991c). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149-181). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1991d). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183-201). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1991e). The biopolitics of postmodern bodies: Constitutions of self in immune system discourse. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 203-230). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1991f). Cyborg at large: Interview with Donna Haraway. In C. Penley ＆ A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 1-20). Minneapolis ＆ Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1991g). The actors are cyborg, nature is coyote, and the geography is elsewhere: Postscript to “Cyborg at large”. In C. Penley ＆ A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 21-26). Minneapolis ＆ Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1992a [1989]). Ecce homo, ain’t (ar’n’t) I a woman, and inappropriate/d others: The human in a post-humanist landscape. In J. Butler ＆ Scott, J. W (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 86-100). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1992b). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossber, C. Nelson ＆ P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). New York ＆ London: Routeledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (1995). Cyborg and symbionts: Living together in the new world order. In C. H. Gray (Ed.), The cyborg handbook (pp. xi-xx). New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway,D.J.(1997).Modest_witness@second_millennium.femalman©_meets_oncomouse™: Feminism and technoscience. New York ＆ London：Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (2000). How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York ＆ London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (2003). Cyborgs to companion species: Reconfiguring kinship in technoscience. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 58-82). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haraway, D. J. (2004 [1992]). Otherworldly conversations; terran topics; local terms. In The Haraway reader (pp. 125-150). New York ＆ London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Towards a posthumanism culture. In M. Benamou ＆ C. Caramella (Eds.), Performance in modern change . Madison: Coda Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we become posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago ＆ London: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper ＆ Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoofd, I. (2002). Cyborg manifesto 2.0: Discussions in feminist figurations, new technologies and social change [Online]. Available: http://www. cyberartsweb.org/cpace/theory/hoofd/index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Honneth, A. (1995). Decentered autonomy: The subject after the fall. In C. W. Wright (Ed.), The fragmented world of the social: Essays in social and political philosophy (pp. 261-271). New York: State University of New York Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, C. B. (2003). Latour and Pickering: Post-human perspectives on science, becoming, and normativity. In D. Ihde ＆ E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 225-240). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kember, S. (1996). Feminist figuration and the question of origin. In G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis ＆ T. Putnam (Eds.), FuturalNatural: Nature/science/culture (pp. 256-269). London ＆ New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kember, S. (1998). Virtual anxiety: Photography, new technologies and subjectivity. Manchester ＆ New York: Manchester University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J, Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264-280). London, Boston ＆ Henley: Routledge ＆ Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Latour, B. (1993 [1991]). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo ＆ Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15-25). Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) de Lauretis, Teresa. (1987). Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes ＆ T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technical systems: New Directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111-134). Cambridge ＆ Massachusetts: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Law, J. (1992). Note on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/ sociology/papers/law-Notes-on-ANT.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Law, J. (1997). Heterogeneities [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac. uk/sociology/papers/Law-Heterogeneities.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law ＆ J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Law, J. (2000). Networks, relations, cyborgs: On the social study of technology [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/ papers/Law-Networks-Relations-Cyborgs.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Law, J. (2004). Enacting naturecultures: A note from STS [Online]. Available: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-enacting-naturecultures.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) van Loon, J. (1996). Technological sensibilities and the cyberpolitics of gender: Donna Haraway’s postmodern feminism. Innovation: The European journal of social sciences, 9(2): 231-243.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Luke, T. W. (2001). Reconstructing nature: How the new informatics are rewrighting the environment and society as bitspace. Capitalism, nature, socialism, 12(3): 3-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lykke, N. (1996). Between monsters, goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science. In N. Lykke ＆ R. Braidotti (Eds.), Between monsters, goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science, medicine and cyberspace (pp. 13-29). London ＆ New Jersey: Zed Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lyotard, J-F. （2001 [1988]）：《非人：時間漫談》，羅國祥譯。北京：商務。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mackenzie, D. ＆ Wajcman, J. (1999). Introductory essay: The social shaping of the technology. In D. Mackenzie ＆ J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of the technology (pp. 3-27). Buckingham ＆ Philadelphia: Open University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marcuse, H. (1997 [1964])：〈從共識型態到工具性控制〉，林明澤譯。收入於《文化與社會：當代論辯》（J. C. Alexander ＆ S. Seidman, Eds.），頁329-339。臺北：立緒。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mason, C. (1995). Terminating bodies: Toward a cyborg history of abortion. In J. Halberstam ＆ I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman bodies (pp. 225-243). Bloomington ＆ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.zh_TW