Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
Title | To "Make" or to "Buy"?Innovation and Vertical Integration in Vertically-related Markets |
Creator | 李文傑 Lee, Wen-chieh |
Contributor | 溫偉任 李文傑 Lee, Wen-chieh |
Key Words | 賽局理論 上游廠商 下游廠商 研發活動 反拖拉斯法 game theory upstream downstream R&D antitrust double marginalization spillover |
Date | 2003 |
Date Issued | 18-Sep-2009 18:55:16 (UTC+8) |
Summary | 本文以一個簡單賽局理論模型為分析依據,探討企業間的自製或是外包策略對整體社會福利的影響。 傳統經濟理論分析告訴我們自製策略可以解決雙重邊際化的問題。但在本文我們舉出一個反例,亦即當存在研發的可能及上下遊市場的研發外溢效果時,垂直整合可能會造成廠商過度研發的情形,最終產生整體社會福利不效益情形。 In this paper, we set up a game-theoretic model, in which the whole industry is composed of a downstream monopolist and two upstream firms. This paper discusses the major debate in a firm’s market strategy: to make or to buy the components it needs. Traditionally, economic theories told us that vertical integration strategy (make strategy) can solve the problem of double marginalization and hence increase profits as well as social welfare. Nevertheless, this result does not necessarily hold when R&D possibility is introduced. We show that when there is downstream to upstream R&D spillover, vertical integration may result in an over-investment in R&D from the social standpoint. This result may shed some light on the rationale behind recent antitrust rulings. |
參考文獻 | 1.Areeda, Phillip, Kaplow, Louis., 1997, ""Antitrust Analysis 5th edition," Aspen Law and Business. 2.Choi, J.P., 1989, ""An Analysis of Cooperative R&D," Working Paper, Development of Economics, Harvard University. 3.Choi, J.P., 1993, ""Cooperative R&D with product market competition," International Journal of Industrial Organization,11, 553-71. 4.Choi, J.P., Gwanghoon Lee and Christodoulous Stefanadis, 2002, ""The Effects of Integration on R&D Incentives in Systems Markets," Payment System Studies, Research Dept., Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 5.d`Aspremont, C. and A.Jacquemin, 1988, ""Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers," American Economic Review, 5, 1133-7. 6.Damiano Bruno Silipo, and Avi Weiss, 2001, ""Cooperation and Competition in R&D with Uncertainty and Spillovers," Report of research project supported by Science Technology and the Economy Program, (STE), at the Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology. 7.Gellhorn, Ernest, Kovacic, William E., 1994, ""Antitrust Law and Economics 4th\\quad edition," St. Paul,Minn. 8.Katz, M.L., 1986, ""An analysis of cooperative research and development," European Journal of Political Economy, 4, 527-43. 9.Marjit, S., 1991, ""Incentives for cooperative and non- cooperative R and D in Duopoly," Economics Letters, 37, 187-191. 10.Motta, M., 1992, ""Cooperative R&D and vertical product differentiation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 643-61. 11.Suzumura, K., 1992, ""Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in a Oligopoly with Spillovers," American Economic Review, 82, 1307-20. 12.Tirole,J., 1988, ""The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. |
Description | 碩士 國立政治大學 國際經營與貿易研究所 197878 92 |
資料來源 | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091351001 |
Type | thesis |
dc.contributor.advisor | 溫偉任 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 李文傑 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lee, Wen-chieh | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 李文傑 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Lee, Wen-chieh | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2003 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 18:55:16 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 18:55:16 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 18:55:16 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0091351001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36589 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國際經營與貿易研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 197878 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 92 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文以一個簡單賽局理論模型為分析依據,探討企業間的自製或是外包策略對整體社會福利的影響。 傳統經濟理論分析告訴我們自製策略可以解決雙重邊際化的問題。但在本文我們舉出一個反例,亦即當存在研發的可能及上下遊市場的研發外溢效果時,垂直整合可能會造成廠商過度研發的情形,最終產生整體社會福利不效益情形。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In this paper, we set up a game-theoretic model, in which the whole industry is composed of a downstream monopolist and two upstream firms. This paper discusses the major debate in a firm’s market strategy: to make or to buy the components it needs. Traditionally, economic theories told us that vertical integration strategy (make strategy) can solve the problem of double marginalization and hence increase profits as well as social welfare. Nevertheless, this result does not necessarily hold when R&D possibility is introduced. We show that when there is downstream to upstream R&D spillover, vertical integration may result in an over-investment in R&D from the social standpoint. This result may shed some light on the rationale behind recent antitrust rulings. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction.....................................1 2 Competition in Upstream Market...................5 2.1 The Model....................................5 2.2 The parametric Constraint....................8 2.3 Price Competition...........................13 3 Vertical Integration............................16 3.1 Integration Incentives......................19 4 Social Welfare Comparison.......................22 5 Comparative Statics.............................24 6 Conclusion......................................28 7 Reference.......................................30 8 Appendix........................................32 8.1 Proof.......................................32 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091351001 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 賽局理論 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 上游廠商 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 下游廠商 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 研發活動 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 反拖拉斯法 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | game theory | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | upstream | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | downstream | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | R&D | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | antitrust | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | double marginalization | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | spillover | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | To "Make" or to "Buy"?Innovation and Vertical Integration in Vertically-related Markets | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.Areeda, Phillip, Kaplow, Louis., 1997, ""Antitrust Analysis | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5th edition," Aspen Law and Business. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Choi, J.P., 1989, ""An Analysis of Cooperative R&D," | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Working Paper, Development of Economics, Harvard University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Choi, J.P., 1993, ""Cooperative R&D with product market | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | competition," International Journal of Industrial | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organization,11, 553-71. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.Choi, J.P., Gwanghoon Lee and Christodoulous Stefanadis, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002, ""The Effects of Integration on R&D Incentives in | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Systems Markets," Payment System Studies, Research Dept., | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Federal Reserve Bank of New York. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.d`Aspremont, C. and A.Jacquemin, 1988, ""Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers," American | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Economic Review, 5, 1133-7. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.Damiano Bruno Silipo, and Avi Weiss, 2001, ""Cooperation and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Competition in R&D with Uncertainty and Spillovers," Report | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of research project supported by Science Technology and the | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Economy Program, (STE), at the Samuel Neaman Institute for | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Advanced Studies in Science and Technology. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.Gellhorn, Ernest, Kovacic, William E., 1994, ""Antitrust Law | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | and Economics 4th\\quad edition," St. Paul,Minn. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.Katz, M.L., 1986, ""An analysis of cooperative research and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | development," European Journal of Political Economy, 4, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 527-43. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.Marjit, S., 1991, ""Incentives for cooperative and non- | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | cooperative R and D in Duopoly," Economics Letters, 37, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 187-191. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10.Motta, M., 1992, ""Cooperative R&D and vertical product | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | differentiation," International Journal of Industrial | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organization, 10, 643-61. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11.Suzumura, K., 1992, ""Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | in a Oligopoly with Spillovers," American Economic Review, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 82, 1307-20. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12.Tirole,J., 1988, ""The Theory of Industrial Organization," | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. | zh_TW |