Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 Why does a firm keep "Sleeping Patents"? From the perespective of quality and depreciation
作者 王泉仁
貢獻者 溫偉任
王泉仁
關鍵詞 sleeping patent
日期 2004
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 18:55:55 (UTC+8)
摘要 We investigate why a firm hold “Sleeping Patents” in a two period model. Two main results are found by our simulation analysis. First, the larger the depreciation measure of the new patent goods is, the greater the possibility of not exercising new patent is, even if the new patent is still more profitable than the old in one-stage model. Second, the possibilities to exercise the less profitable patent increases if a monopolist can commit its stage-two quantity in stage one.
參考文獻 Arya, A. and B. Mittendorf (2004), “Purchasing Sleeping Patents to Curtail Budget Padding.”
Economics Letters, 82, 221-226.
Fudenberg, P and J. Tirole (1985), “Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New
Technology.” Review of Economic Studies, 52, 383-401.
Motta, Mussimo (1993), “Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition.”
Journal of Industrial Economics, 41, 113-132.
Mussa, M. and Rosen, S. (1978), “Monopoly and Product Quality.” Journal of Economic
Theory, 18, 301-317.
Kutsoati, E. and J. Zabujnik (2001), “Durable Goods Monopoly, Learning-by-doing and
Sleeping Patents.” Working Paper WP2001-05, Tufts University.
Reinganum, J. (1983), “Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly.” American
Economic Review, 73, 741-748
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
92351011
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092351011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 溫偉任zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王泉仁zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 王泉仁zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 18:55:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 18:55:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 18:55:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0092351011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36594-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92351011zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) We investigate why a firm hold “Sleeping Patents” in a two period model. Two main results are found by our simulation analysis. First, the larger the depreciation measure of the new patent goods is, the greater the possibility of not exercising new patent is, even if the new patent is still more profitable than the old in one-stage model. Second, the possibilities to exercise the less profitable patent increases if a monopolist can commit its stage-two quantity in stage one.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………... 1
     
     2 The Model…………………………………………………………………..…... 2
     
     3 Optimal Choices of the Monopolist ………………………………………..…... 4
     
     3.1 Selling S1 Goods in Stage 1……………………………………………..……. 5
     3.2 Selling S2 Goods in stage 1………………………...……………………..….. 7
     3.3 Simulation Results……………………………...………………………..….. 8
     
     4 Optimal Choices under Commitment ………………………………………….. 10
     
     4.1 Selling S1 Goods in Stage 1 under commitment……...………….………..…… 10
     4.2 Selling S2 Goods in stage 1 under commitment…………...……………..…….. 12
     3.3 Simulation Results………………………………………...………….....…... 13
     
     5 Conclusions…………………………………………………..………………..... 15
     
     References…………………………………………………...………………..…... 15
     Appendix 1…………………………………………………..…………………..... 16
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092351011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) sleeping patenten_US
dc.title (題名) Why does a firm keep "Sleeping Patents"? From the perespective of quality and depreciationzh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arya, A. and B. Mittendorf (2004), “Purchasing Sleeping Patents to Curtail Budget Padding.”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics Letters, 82, 221-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fudenberg, P and J. Tirole (1985), “Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of Newzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology.” Review of Economic Studies, 52, 383-401.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Motta, Mussimo (1993), “Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition.”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Industrial Economics, 41, 113-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mussa, M. and Rosen, S. (1978), “Monopoly and Product Quality.” Journal of Economiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Theory, 18, 301-317.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kutsoati, E. and J. Zabujnik (2001), “Durable Goods Monopoly, Learning-by-doing andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sleeping Patents.” Working Paper WP2001-05, Tufts University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reinganum, J. (1983), “Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly.” Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economic Review, 73, 741-748zh_TW