| dc.contributor.advisor | 譚丹琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 陳俊誠 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳俊誠 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 20:00:09 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 20:00:09 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 20:00:09 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0096351023 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36873 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國際經營與貿易研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96351023 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 企業集團在台灣經濟發展的過程中，一直扮演著相當重要的角色，而企業集團的一大特色就是往往伴隨著許多多角化事業體系，然而不同企業集團多角化的程度不一，因此本研究嘗試以實證模型為主，並且列舉台南紡織，中國鋼鐵，明基電通三個個案為輔來，探討企業集團多角化的原因，我們主要以西元2000 年的資料實證並且發現以下結論:1.台灣的企業集團將隨著規模越大，多角化程度越高。2.台灣的企業集團的經營績效若越高，則多角化程度越低。3.台灣的電子產業相較於其他的產業而言多角化程度較低。4.台灣的家族企業和多角化程度的高低無關。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章:緒論.............................1第一節:研究動機......................... 1第二節:研究問題..........................3第三節:研究對象與範圍….………………….………4第四節:研究流程…………………………………….5第五節:論文架構…………………………….……….6第二章:文獻回顧…………………………………….7第一節:企業集團的概念和定義…….………………7第二節:企業集團的成因以及特色…............9第三節:台灣企業集團的發展史和現況…………...13第三章:研究架構與方法……………….…………..20第一節:研究假設……………………………………..20第二節:研究樣本……………………………………..25第三節:研究方法……………………………………..31第四章 :研究結果分析……………………………….32第一節:實證研究結……………………………………32第二節:個案介紹補充…………………………………41第五章:結論與建議………….……………………….66第一節:研究結論……………………………………..66第二節:研究貢獻……………………………………..69第三節:研究限制以及未來的研究方向……………..70第六章:參考文獻………………………………………71第一節:中文文獻……………………………………..71第二節:英文文獻……………………………………..71表目錄表2.1 歷年集團企業擁有分子企業家數變動表………………….15表2.2 歷年集團企業雇用員工與就業人口比率表……….……..16表2.3 歷年集團企業營收淨額與GNP 比較表…….…………….17表2.4 集團企業核心公司主要經營行業變動表…….………….18表3.1 研究假設綜合整理……….……………………………….24表3.2 模型變數綜合整理…….………………………………….30表4.1 敘述統計量……….……/………………………………..32表4.2 多角化企業前十名表…….…………………………………33表4.3 相關係數表………………………………………………..35表4.4 迴歸模型結果……….………….………………………….36表4.5 假設驗證綜合整理….………….………………………….39表4.6 台南紡織分子企業表…………………………………………42表4.7 台南紡織產業細目分析表……………..……………………48表4.8 中國鋼鐵分子企業表…………………………………………50表4.9 中國鋼鐵產業細目分析表……………………………………57表4.10 明基分子企業表…………………….………………………58表4.11 明基產業細目分析表……………………………………….64表4.12 個案分析結果綜合比較……………………….…………..65 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 103818 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 141519 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 125579 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 154261 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 207631 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 295652 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 324095 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 455316 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 199782 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 203619 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096351023 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 企業集團 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 多角化 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 台灣企業集團多角化因素研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文文獻: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.中華徵信所，《2002年台灣地區集團企業研究》。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.中華徵信所，《2008年台灣地區集團企業研究》。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.石賜亮， 民國八十八年，《台灣傳統集團企業多角化與國際化成長策略之 研究》國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.王衍智，民國八十八年，《廠商多角化生產之決定因素研究-我國電子業之實證分析》國立台灣大學經濟研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.陳正倉，林惠玲，陳忠榮 莊春發，民國九十三年，《產業經濟學》，雙葉出版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.湯明哲，民國九十四年，《策略精論》，天下遠見出版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.彭正浩，民國八十八年， 《台灣銀行業多角化與其績效之研究》國立台灣大學經濟研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.蘇怡如，民國九十年，《台灣集團企團多角化程度之探討》國立成功大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文文獻: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.Chi-Nien. Chung and Ishtiaq Mahmood. 2006.”Taiwanese Business Groups:Steady Growth in Institutional | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Transition.”In Business Groups in East Asia: Financial Crisis , Restructuring, and New Growth, ed. S. Chang, Oxford University Press,pp.70-93 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Demetz, R. S. and P. E. Strahan.1997. “Diversification, Size, and Risk at Bank Holding Companies,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 3, pp.300-313. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Granovetter, Mark. 2005.”Business Groups and Social Organization.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Second edition, ed. N Smelser and R. Swedberg. Princeton ,Princeton University Press,pp.429-450 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.Hamilton, Gary G & Feenstra, Robert C, 1995. "Varieties of Hierarchies and Markets: An Introduction," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.Jacquemin, A. P. and C. H. Berry, 1979.“Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, pp. 359-369 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.J. L. Stimpert and Irene M. Duhaime,1997.”Seeing the Big Picture: The Influence of Industry, Diversification, and Business Strategy on Performance”, Academy of Management.Vol.40 No.3 pp.560-583 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.Khanna Tarun & Palepu Krishna .1999.“The Right Way to Restructure Conglomerates in Emerging Markets”, Harvard Business Review, 6-8, pp.125-134. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.Khanna, Tarun & Rivkin W. Jan 2001.“Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.45-74 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.Khnna and Yishay ,Yafeh. 200.7”Business Groups In Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites?”, Journal of Economic Literature” Vol.XLV, pp.331-372 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10.Leff, Nathaniel H .1976.”Capital Markets in Less Developed Countries: The Group principle. In money and Finance in Economic Growth and Development: Essays in Honor of Edward S. Shaw, ed. R. McKinnon” New York: Decker Press, pp.97-122 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11.Orru, Marco, Nicole Woolsey Biggart, and Gary G. Hamilton. 1997.”The Economic Oragnization of East Asian Capitalism.” Thousand Oaks, Calif.: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12.Reed, R. and G A. Luffman.1986.“Diversification: The Growing Confusion”, Strategic Management Journal, 7, pp.29-35 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13.Robert, E. Hoskisson. Richard, A. Johnson. Laszlo, Tihanyi. Robert, E. White.2005 .“Diversified Business Groups and Corporate Refocusing in Emerging Economies”, Journal of Management, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp.941-965 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14.Strachan, Harry W.1976.”Family and Other business groups in Economic | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Development”:The Case of Nicaragua. New York: Praeger | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15.Sayan, Chatterjee. and Birger Wernerfelt. 1991.The Link Between Resources and Type of Diversification”Theory and Evidence”,Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp.33-4 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16.Teece, D.J. 1980. “Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise”,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, pp.223-247. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17.Teece, D.J. 1982.“ Towards an Economic Theory of the Mutiproduct Frims”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, pp.39-63. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18.Wenyi, Chu. 2004.”Are Group-Affiliated Firms Really More Profitable than Nonaffiliated, Small Business Economics,22,pp.391-405 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19.Xiaowei, Luo. and Chi-Nien Chung. 2005. ”Keeping It All in the Family:The Role of Particularistic Relationships In Business Group Performance during Institutional Transition.”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, pp.404-439 | zh_TW |
