| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭濟世 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 譚雅蓁 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 譚雅蓁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 20:21:03 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 20:21:03 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 20:21:03 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0953580131 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36976 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 風險管理與保險研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95358013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 金融服務業的跨業經營讓保險業監理制度面臨新變革，而2008年金融海嘯重創國際金融以及全球經濟更讓金融服務業監理出現更多未可知的變數，歐盟在體解現行保險業清償能力制度（Solvency I）不足下著手於新清償能力制度（Solvency II）之建立，惟透過風險的角度作全面制度的基礎著眼點是否真能適切反映監理需求、達到保護保單持有人的最終目標，並成為帶領保險業駛離本次金融海嘯的諾亞方舟？本文從歐盟現行保險業清償能力制度談起，逐步進入Solvency II計畫的實質內涵，兼論該制度設計可能存在的問題，並對於新制在未來趨勢上對國際保險業監理所可能造成之影響作初步探討。最後，從歐盟Solvency II計畫的角度出發、反視臺灣現行保險業清償能力監理架構，從而對於未來制度之設計給予相關之建議，並期盼本文能以投石問路之姿，在全球金融籠罩在一片動盪不安的此時，就臺灣保險業清償能力監理制度這一塊，提供另一種可能的思維方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章、緒論 5第二章、歐盟現行保險業清償能力規定〈Solvency I〉之介紹 9第一節、 歐洲保險監理沿革概述---以清償能力為中心 9第二節、 Solvency I之形成及其主要內容 10第三節、 Solvency I之清償能力要求 12第四節、 Solvency I未能解決之問題 15第三章、Solvency II計畫之提出 18第一節、Solvency II計畫之形成背景 18第二節、Solvency II計畫之五大目標 19第四章、Solvency II計畫之推動 28第一節、 Solvency II計畫之二階段任務 28第二節、 Solvency II計畫之參與者 31第三節、 Solvency II計畫之時間表 38第五章、Solvency II計畫其背後之經濟原則 40第一節、 資訊不對稱 41第一項、 資訊不對稱之產生 41第二項、 如何降低資訊不對稱 41第三項、 Solvency II計畫對於消費者資訊取得之影響 42第二節、外部性 44第一項、 外部性之產生 44第二項、 如何降低外部性 45第三項、 Solvency II計畫如何降低外部性之影響 45第三節、 不完全競爭 47第一項、 不完全競爭之產生 47第二項、 如何降低不完全競爭 47第三項、 Solvency II計畫如何促進完全競爭市場 48第六章、Solvency II計畫之三大柱 49第一節、 Solvency II計劃下之第一支柱 50第一項、 Solvency II計劃下之第一支柱概述 50第二項、 由經濟觀點出發的Solvency II計畫其潛在經濟上利益 51第三項、 總資產負債表法 52第四項、 責任準備金 53第一款、 責任準備金之定義 53第二款、 責任準備金之計算 55第五項、 最佳估計值 56第一款、 最佳估計值於定義上之沿革 56第二款、 Solvency II計畫下之最佳估計值 59第六項、 風險邊際 59第一款、 風險邊際之存在實益 59第二款、 風險邊際之定義 60第三款、 風險邊際與最佳估計值兩者之關係 61第四款、 風險邊際之計算 62第七項、 清償能力資本要求 64第一款、 清償能力之概念 65第二款、 SCR之定義 66第三款、 使用ESA計算之SCR 67第四款、 使用內部模型計算之SCR 69第八項、 最低資本要求 71第一款、 MCR之定義 71第二款、 MCR之計算 72 第九項、Solvency II計畫第一柱下對於保險公司各種資本要求其彼此間之關係 72 第十項、Solvency II與Solvency I於資本要求規定之比較 74第十一項、CEIOPS之量化影響研究（QIS）對於Solvency II計畫第一柱之影響 75 第一款、 QIS1之研究報告 76第二款、QIS2之研究報告 79第三款、QIS3之研究報告 81第四款、QIS4之研究報告 83第五款、小結 86第二節、 Solvency II計劃下之第二支柱 87第一項、 Solvency II計畫之第二支柱概述 87第二項、 監理審查流程 89 第一款、強調公司內部風險管理品質 89第二款、擴大風險考量之範圍 90 第三款、監理機關進行干預之權限行使範圍 90 第四款、一致性之監理標準 92第三項、 審慎資產管理 92第三節、 Solvency II計劃下之第三支柱 94第一項、 國際財務報導準則IFRS 7：金融商品揭露對於保險業的影響 94第二項、 第二階段的保險契約會計IFRS 4對於保險業的影響 96第七章、歐洲執行委員所研擬之Solvency II提案 98第一節、 Solvency II之立法模式與法源基礎 98第一項、 Solvency II之立法模式 98第二項、 Solvency II之法源基礎 101第二節、 Solvency II適用範圍 102第三節、 未來Solvency II Directive之主要內容介紹---以2008年Solvency II新修正提案為基礎 102第一款、 質性要件及其監督 103第二款、 監理報告以及公開揭露 112第三款、 推動監理趨於一致 113第四款、 定量要件 114第五款、 集團監理 126第六款、 具體實行措施 128第八章、評析Solvency II計畫的現在與未來 129第一節、 Solvency II計畫目前在業界所造成之影響 129第二節、 Solvency II計畫所遺留的問題 135第三節、 Solvency II計畫：保險業監理的現在進行式與必須面對的價值判斷 144第九章、從Solvency II計畫看臺灣保險業清償能力監理制度 148第一節、 臺灣保險業監理即將面臨Solvency II制度之挑戰 148第二節、 對於未來臺灣保險業清償能力監理制度之觀察以及相關立法建議 154 第一項、清償能力資本要求 154第二項、公司治理與監理審查 160第三項、資訊揭露 163第十章、結論與建議：掌握風險、掌握未來 166第一節、結論 166第二節、建議 167參考文獻 172 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 96271 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 147661 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 121686 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 169713 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 160088 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 277893 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 221766 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 296780 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 201136 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 639074 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 437776 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 271014 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 309611 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 249683 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 141860 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0953580131 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 清償能力制度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 經濟資本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 內部模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 資訊揭露 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 風險管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Solvency II | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 保險業清償能力制度之探討---以歐盟Solvency II為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.Arne Sandström(2007): Solvency-Models, Assessment and Regulation. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Benston, G. J. (2000): Consumer Protection as Justification for Regulating Financial Services Firms and Products Source. Journal of Financial Services Research, 17(3).. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.CEA (2005): Solvency II, Building Blocks for the Solvency II Project. CEA Working Document, May. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.CEA (2006): CEA Document On Cost of Capital. The European Insurance and Reinsurance federation, April. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.CEIOPS (2006): QIS1- Summary report. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors, CEIOPS-FS-01/06, March. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.CEIOPS (2006a): QIS2- Summary report. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors, CEIOPS-SEC-71/06S. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.CEIOPS (2007): CEIOPS` Report on its third Quantitative Impact Study (QIS3) for Solvency II. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors, CEIOPS-DOC-19/07, November. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.CEIOPS (2008): QIS4 Technical Specifications. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors, MARKT/2505/08, March. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.CEIOPS (2008a): CEIOPS’ Report on its fourth Quantitative Impact Study (QIS4) for Solvency II. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors, CEIOPS-SEC-82/08, November. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10.Dave Lenckus(2008): Rating agencies start to embrace economic capital modeling. Business Insurance,October. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11.EC (2003): Solvency II – Reflections on the general outline of a framework directive and mandates for further technical work. European Commission, MARKT/F3/VR,UL D(2003), October. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12.EC (2008): Amended Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance(solvency II)(recast).European Commission, COM(2008) 119 final/ 2007/0143 (COD), February. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13.Eléonore, Leurent and Voigt,Tobias(2007): Basel II and Solvency II. Umeå: Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business, July. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14.EPFS (2006): EPFSF Briefing: Solvency II. European Paliamentary Financial Services Forum, July. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15.French, Ilse and Greyling, Quinton(2007): IFRS 4 (Insurance Contracts) Phase II: The revolution in insurance accounting. Accountancy SA. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16.Ernst & Young (2008): IFRS 7 in the insurance industry. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17.FSA (2006): Solvency II: a new framework for prudential regulation of insurance in the EU. Her Majesty`s Treasury, Financial Services Authority, February. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18.FSA (2008): Insurance Risk Management: The Path to Solvency II. Financial Services Authority, September. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19.IAIS (2005): Towards a common structure and common standards for the assessment of insurer solvency: cornerstones for the formulation of regulatory financial requirements. International Association of Insurance Supervisors, October. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20.IASC: Technical Summary: IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts. IASC Foundation Education. Available at http://www.iasb.org/NR/rdonlyres/DC6611CC-9789-43E8-8940-0D36839DAC19/0/IFRS4.pdf | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21.IASB(2007): Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts. Part 1: Invitation to Comment and main text. The International Accounting Standards Board, Discussion Paper, May. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22.Jes Herata de Soto (2008):The fatal error of Solvency II, the Actuary, December. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23.Kathleen A. Blum and David J. Otto(1998): BEST ESTIMATE LOSS RESERVING: AN ACTUARIAL PERSPECTIVE. Casualty Actuarial Society, the Actuarial Review. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24.Lommele, Jan A andMcCarter, Michael G.(1998): Is the “Best Estimate” Best?Issues in Recording a Liability for Unpaid Claims, Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses. Casualty Actuarial Society, the Actuarial Review. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25.Michael Bradford(2008a): Solvency II poses a tough challenge for insurers doing business in Europe. Business Insurance, October. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26.Michael Bradford(2008b):Solvency II packs global influence. Business Insurance, October. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27.Maciej Sterzynski and Jan Dhaene(2006): Solvency II: changes within the European Single insurance Market. Faculty of Economics at the K.U.Leuven, April. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 28.OECD(2002): Workshop on Insurance and Private Pensions in the Baltic States – Prudent Person Approach. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, February. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29.Phil Vermeulen and Jeev Muthulingam (2008):Solvency II: Towards implementation, the Actuary, June. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 30.Rees, R.,Gravelle,H.,and Wambach, A.(1999): Regulation of Insurance Markets.Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 24(1). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 31.Richard Miller(2008): Compromise could be reached on Solvency II group support: Experts. Business Insurance, December. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 32.Sharma (2002): Prudential Supervision of Insurance undertakings. Conference of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Insurance Supervisory Services of The Member States of the European Union, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | December. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 33.Spencer,P.D.(2000): The Structure and Regulation of Financial Markets. Oxford University Press, Oxford. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 34.Stefan Schuckmann (2007):The Impact of Solvency II on Insurance Market Competition - An Economic Assessment.Working Paper Series in Finance, Paper No. 58, University of St. Gallen. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 35.Stuart Collins(2008a): Solvency II`s impact on reinsurance industry uncertain. Business insurance,September. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 36.Stuart Collins(2008b): Company failures and uninsurability may increase under solvency II rules. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 37.Swiss Re (2006): Solvency II: an intergrated risk approach for European insurers. Sigma,No.4/2006. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 38.World Bank (2005): Financial sector assessment: A Handbook. World Bank 1st edition. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 39.Zvi Wiener(2007): SOLVENCY II AND THE SOLVENCY CAPITAL REQUIREMENT FOR INSURANCE FIRMS IN ISRAEL. Israel Economic Review Vol. 5 No. 2. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.江美艷，全球面臨IFRS之挑戰，勤業眾信通訊，第0806期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.莊蕎安，金融危機，錯在會計？，會計研究月刊，第276期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.黃金澤，談金融商品會計處理之國際重大改革方向（中），會計研究月刊，第275期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.敬永康、葉詩瑾，運用風險值模型(VaR)衡量保險業之風險基礎資本額(RBC)，貨幣觀測與信用評等，2001年9月。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.鄭濟世，金融整合下的臺灣保險市場發展方向，保險實務與制度，第伍卷，第二期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.蔡政憲，漫談RBC的是是非非，風險與保險，第19期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.謝國松，又是會計惹的禍？公平價值會計全球論戰下的省思（一），會計研究月刊，第277期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.David N. Ingram，标准普尔的保险公司ERM评估，风险管理简报，第2006期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.Pascal Fontaine，認識歐盟，2007年歐洲經貿辦事處翻譯更新版。 | zh_TW |
