Publications-Theses

題名 武裝衝突法中陸戰法規之理論與實踐
作者 彭玉明
貢獻者 趙國材
彭玉明
關鍵詞 武裝衝突法
陸戰法規
童兵
地雷
The Law of Armed Conflict
The Law of War on Land
Child Soldier
Landmine
日期 2006
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 20:35:28 (UTC+8)
摘要 武裝衝突法已成為各交戰國(方)爭取國際支持之重要手段,軍隊執行作戰任務,必須遵守武裝衝突法及國際法的相關規範,始可確保作戰行動的合法性及正當性。陸戰法規是一系列戰爭法規則和慣例的重要歷史淵源,為武裝衝突法之主體。隨著以規範交戰規則為主的海牙法體系與規範人道保護規則為主的日內瓦法體系逐漸整合,陸戰法規除規範作戰使用武器的規則外,其他有關交戰者、敵對行為及軍事佔領等規則均納入1949年日內瓦公約及1977年的兩項附加議定書。
觀察國際社會對陸戰法規實踐的面向,除可從戰史例證中得到驗證外,尚可從童兵、地雷、武裝衝突遺留爆炸物處理及文化資產保護等議題,得以進一步瞭解陸戰法規實踐的全貌。要禁止利用童兵的行為,除了國家行為者應負履約義務外,對非國家行為者侵犯兒童權利行為的制止是當務之急,國際刑事法院應扮演更積極的角色。2003年波灣戰爭中,《禁雷公約》雖未能阻止伊拉克使用人員殺傷雷,但已顯示該公約對非締約國產生的隱性約束力,禁用人員殺傷雷的規範雖未完全實現,但已為多數國家認同,未來可能成為一項習慣國際法。《戰爭遺留爆炸物議定書》雖可為解決武裝衝突結束後平民所面臨的主要威脅提供一項法律制度,但因條約內容強制性不足,成效尚難顯現。目前對文化資深保護的重點在於免遭武裝衝突毀損為主要議題,因武裝衝突而流落異域之文化資產回復或返還,可能成為未來發展之主要議題。
The Law of Armed Conflict has become one of the important means to win the international support for all belligerent. The army must comply with the Law of Armed Conflict in combat, in order to ensure the legitimacy of military operation. The law of war on land has its historical origins for regulations and customary of the Law of War, and also has codified as the main body of the Law of Armed Conflict. The Law of The Hague and the Law of Geneva have been gradually integrated. All these regulations of the law of war on land about combatant, hostilities and military occupation were included in the “Geneva Conventions of 1949” and two “Additional Protocols of 1977”, except the regulations of the use of the weapon.
Observing the different aspects of the law of war on land in the international community from the cases above, furthermore, the issues of “Child Soldier”, “Landmine”, “Explosive Remnants of Armed Conflict” and “Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict”, can help to understand the full view of the practice of the law of war on land. For stopping the use of child soldiers, the obligation of convention should be executed by the state actors, the task of top priority should prevent the infringements of the right of child of the non-state actors, and the International Criminal Court should play a more positive role. In the “Gulf War 2003”, the rule, “Convention on Prohibition of Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Landmines and on Their Destruction”, although it has not prevent Iraq from the use of anti-personnel landmine, had showed the indistinct effect of the convention to the powers in the conflict that may not be parties to the convention. Although the rule of prohibition of use of anti-personnel mines has not completely realized, it had already been approved by most states, and may become one of the international customary in the future. The “Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War annexed to the “Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the 1980 Convention)” provided a legal protection for the civilian after the armed conflict. Its effect was still too difficult to manifest, because the force of provisions of the protocol were insufficient. The protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict focuses on exempting from the damage of cultural property at present, but the issue like how to recover the cultural properties which were pillaged in armed conflicts, would become the main theme in the foreseeable future.
參考文獻 壹、中文部分
一、專書
王鐵崖編。《國際法》。北京:法律,1995年。
王鐵崖、朱荔蓀、田如萱等編。《戰爭法文獻集》。北京:解放軍,1986 年。
俞正山。《武裝衝突法》。北京:軍事科學,2002年。
高文俊。《韓戰憶往—浴血餘生話人權》。台北:生智文化,2000 年。
馬繼東編。《生化武器與秘密戰爭》。北京:解放軍文藝,2001年。
陳榮傳。〈由國際法觀點論武裝衝突事件中文化資產之保護〉,丘宏達教授六秩晉五華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會編,《國際法論文集》。台北:三民,2001年。
盛紅生、楊澤偉、秦小軒。《武力的邊界─21世紀前期武裝衝突中的國際法問題研究》。北京:時事,2003年。
張景恩。《國際法與戰爭》。北京:國防大學,1999年。
楊永明。《國際安全與國際法》。台北:元照,2003年。
雷崧生。《日內瓦法典》。台北,中華,1964年。
董霖。《國際公法與國際組織》。台北:台灣商務,1995年。
趙永琛編。《國際刑法約章滙編》。北京:中國人民公安大學,1999年。
端木正。《國際法》。北京:北京大學,1989年。
魏靜芬。《戰爭法學》。台北:社團法人台灣海洋事務策進會,2005年。
叢文勝。《戰爭法原理與實用》。北京:軍事科學,2003年。
叢文勝。《法律戰經典案例評析》。北京:解放軍,2004年。
中國人民志願軍政治部編。《中國人民志願軍抗美援朝戰爭政治工作總結》。北京:解放軍出版社,1985年。
軍事社會科學叢書編輯部編。《美伊作戰研究專輯》。台北:政治作戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心,2004年。
二、譯作
夏爾‧盧梭(C., Rousseau)。《武裝衝突法》,張凝等譯。北京:中國對外翻譯公司,1987年。
葛德斯坦(Goldstein, Joshua S.)。《國際關係》(International Relations),歐信宏、胡祖慶合譯。台北:雙葉,2003年。
古特曼(Gutman, Roy)、瑞夫(David Rieff)編。《戰爭的罪行》(Crimes of War),席代岳譯。台北:麥田,2002年。
勞特派特(Lauterpacht, H.)編。《奧本海(L. Oppenheim)國際法:下卷(第一分冊)》王鐵崖、陳鐵強譯。北京:商務印書館,1972年。
奧本海(Oppenheim, L.)。《國際法》(International Law),岑德彰譯。台北:台灣商務印館,1969年。
羅吉斯(Rogers, Anthony P.V.)、麥赫比(Paul Malherbe)。《中道之師:武裝衝突法手冊》(Fight It Right: Model Manual on the Law of Armed Conflict for Armed Forces),楊紫函、周茂林、林健全等譯。桃園:國防大學,2005年。
盧梭(Rousseau, J.J.)。《社會契約論》(Du Contract Social),何兆武譯。北京:商務印書館,1980年。
三、期刊論文
王俊南。〈武裝衝突法要義之闡釋〉,《陸軍學術雙月刊》,42卷489期。2006年10月,頁139-151。
王玉強。〈周恩來與朝鮮戰爭戰俘遣返問題〉,《黨的文獻》,4 期。1999 年,頁28-33。
江瑞林。〈從兩伊戰爭中看核生化武器在未來戰爭中所扮角色〉,《核生化防護季刊》,第50期。1995年10月,頁6-13。
冷新宇。〈論徵募兒童兵作為戰爭罪〉,《西安政治學院學報》,19卷2期。2006年4月,頁69-73。
徐燄。〈朝鮮戰爭中的戰俘之迷〉,《世界軍事》,2004年3期。2004年3月,頁50-55。
高銘暄、王秀梅。〈建立國際刑事法院的法律意義〉,《吉林大學社會科學學報》,第3期。2004年6月,頁16-21。
賀明。〈中朝與美軍在遣返戰俘問題上的鬥爭〉,《文史精華》,2 期。1996 年,頁4-9。
張立。〈僱傭軍的戰爭遊戲〉,《中國科技縱橫》,8期。2004年8月,頁8-17。
鄭建國。〈從國際法關於戰俘的規定看虐囚事件〉,《襄樊學院學報》,25卷4期。2004年7月,頁65-68。
叢文勝。〈試析現代戰爭法的幾個基本問題〉,《中國軍事科學》,17卷1期。2004年2月,頁73-81。
四、碩士論文
張謨猷。〈禁止化學武器公約之研究〉。國立政治大學外交究所,碩士論文,2004年4月。
五、網際網路專文
沈志華、李丹慧。〈1953年朝鮮停戰:莫斯科的安排和做法—關於朝鮮停戰談判最後階段的俄國檔案文獻〉。http://www.shenzhihua.net/cxzz/000023_4.htm
祖國斌。〈虐待戰俘是違反國際法和公約的嚴重罪行〉。CRI Online國際在線,http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.chinabroadcast.cn/3821/2004/05/12/107@156337.htm
胡瑞麟。〈現代戰場殺手-燃料空氣彈〉。軍事刊物http://past_journal.mnd.gov.tw/%E5%BE%8C%E5%8B%A4%E5%8D%8A%E5%B9%B4%E5%88%8A/Magazinefile/mag31/No31/31-4.htm
〈美國大使談聯合國維和人員得到一年豁免的問題〉。美國參考,http://usinfo.org/mgck/usinfo.state.gov/regional/ea/mgck/archive02/0715icc.htm
〈擔憂出國可能被捕,以高級軍官停止赴英進修〉。中央社,http://www.mnd.gov.tw/modnews/mininews/matter.aspx?PublicID=1821
〈萬處考古點 千名美軍守不住 伊拉克古文物遭竊〉,台灣立報http://publish.lihpao.com/InternationalEducationNews/2005/09/03/05C09023/
〈紅十字國際委員會擴大與私營軍事和安全公司的連絡〉。紅十字國際委員會,http://www.icrc.org/web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/html/6QL8XG
〈以軍在黎埋設的地雷炸傷多名排雷專家和醫生〉,新華網,貝魯特2006年11月25日電訊, http://news.gxnews.com.cn/staticpages/20061126/newgx4569061d-885673.shtml
〈讓我們終結人員殺傷雷的時代〉,紅十字國際委員會http://www.icrc.org/Web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/html/6QP47E
〈伊拉克戰爭對文化遺產造成的後果〉,文建會世界遺產知識網,http://wh.cca.gov.tw/tc/learning/learn_1_c.asp?learn_id=284
槍械詞匯。http://gunglossary.home.comcast.net/big5/chi_gun_dict_4.htm
貳、英文部分
一、官方文件
Report of the UN Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict, 10 Nov. 2003.
Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict in the Sudan, 17 Aug. 2006.
Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict in Côte d’Ivoire, 25 Oct. 2006.
The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 37: Tax Strategy for 2003, 19 Sept. 2003.
The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 39: Foreign Investment, 26 June 2003.
The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 46: Amendment of CPA Order 39 on Foreign Investment, 20 Dec. 2003.
U.N. General Assembly Resolution 610(VII), Korea: Reports of the United Nations Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea, 3 Dec. 1952.
U.N. General Assembly Resolution 2603(XXIV), Question of Chemical and Bacteriological (Biological) Weapons, 16 Dec. 1969.
U.N. General Assembly Resolution 2849(XXVI), Development and Environment, 20 Dec. 1971.
U.N. General Assembly Resolution 3264(XXIX), Prohibition of Action to Influence the Environment and Climate for Military and Other Purposes, Incompatible with the Maintenance of International Security, Human Well-being and Health, 9 Dec. 1974.
U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, the Situation in the Middle East, 22 Nov. 1967.
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1261, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 30 Aug. 1999.
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1314, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 11 Aug. 2000.
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1379, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 20 Nov. 2001.
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1460, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 30 Jan. 2003.
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1539, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 22 Apr. 2004.
U.N. Security Council Resolution 1539, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 26 July 2005.
二、專書
Benvenisti, Eyal, The International Law of Occupation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Borrie, John, Explosive Remnants of War: A Global Survey (London: Landmine Action, 2003).
Boylan, Patrick J., Review of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Paris: UNESCO, 1993).
Cave, Rosy, Anthea Lawson and Andrew Sherriff, Cluster Munitions in Albania and Lao PDR (Geneva: UNDIR, 2006).
Feilchenfeld, Ernst. H., The International Economic Law of Belligerent Occupation (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1942).
Fischer, David. Stopping the Spread of Nuclear Weapons: The Past and the Prospects (London: Routledge, 1992).
Gasser, Hans-Peter. ‘International Humanitarian Law – An Introduction’, in Hans Haug (ed.), Humanity for All – The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1993), 22-71.
Glahn, Gerhard Von, The Occupation of Enemy Territory: A Commentary on the Law and Practice of Belligerent Occupation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957).
Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave: law and foreign policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2nd edn., 1979).
Ingrid, Detter, The Law of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn., 2000).
Mccoubry, H., International Humanitarian Law: the Regulation of Armed Conflicts (Hampshire: Gower Pub. Co., 1990).
McDougal, Myres S., and Florention P. Feliciano, Law and Minimum World Public Order : The Legal Regulation and International Coercion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961).
Moyes, Richard (ed.), Foreseeable Harm: The Use and Impact of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon: 2006 (London: Landmine Action, 2006).
Roberts, David Lloyd, The Law of Armed Conflict Teaching File for Instructors: Lesson 1 –Basic Knowledge (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2002).
Rogers, A. P. V., Law on the Battlefield (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995).
Rosas, Allan, The Legal Status of Prisoners of War: A Study in International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1976).
Stone, Julius, Legal Controls of International Conflict: A Treatise on the Dynamics of Disputes and War-law (New York: Rinehart & Co., 1954).
Toman, Jiri, The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Paris: UNESCO, 1996).
Williams, Sharon A., The International and National Protection of Movable Cultural Property: A Comparative Study (New York: Oceana Publications, 1978).
三、期刊
Aldrich, George H., ‘The Law of War on Land’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 90, Issue 1 (Jan. 2000), 42- 63.
Clement, Etienne, ‘Some Recent Practical Experience in the Implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention’, International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1994), 11-25.
Dennis, Michael J., ‘Newly Adopted Protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the Child’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No.4 (Oct. 2000), 789-796.
Eirinberg, Keith W., ‘The United States Reconsiders the 1954 Hague Convention’, International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1994), 25-35.
Gerson, Allan, ‘War, conquered territory, and military occupation in the contemporary international legal system’, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Summer 1977), 525-556.
Goldblat, Jozef, ‘The Biological Weapons Convention - An overview’, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 318 (June 1997), 251-265.
Harbom, Lotta, & Wallensteen, Peter, ‘Armed Conflict and Its International Dimensions, 1946–2004’, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 42, No. 5 (Sept. 2005), 623-635.
Kastenberg, Joshua E., ‘The Legal Regime for Protecting Cultural Property During Armed Conflict’, Air Force Law Review, Vol. 42 (1997), 277-305.
Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94 (Apr. 2000), 239-277.
Meyer, David A., ‘The 1954 Hague Cultural Property Convention and Its Emergence into Customary International Law’, Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 11 (1993), 349-376.
O’Keefe, Roger, ‘The Meaning of “Cultural Property” under the 1954 Hague Convention’, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. XLVI (1999), 26-56.
Oyer III, Harvey E., ‘The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict-Is it Working? A Case Study: The Persian Gulf War Experience’, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 23 (1999), 62-84.
Scheffer, David, ‘Beyond Occupation Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 4 (Oct. 2003), 842-860.
Sopf, Davor, ‘Temporary Protection in Europe After 1990: The ‘Right to Remain’ of Genuine Convention Refugees’, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Vol.6 (2001), 109-156.
Ticehurst, Rupert, ‘The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, (Apr. 1997), 125-134.
Wright, Quincy, ‘The Meaning of the Pact of Paris’, American Journal of International Law, Vol.27, No.1 (Jan. 1933), 39-61.
Zander, Jean Pascal, ‘The CWC in the Context of the 1925 Geneva Debates’, The Nonproliferation Review, Vol.3, No.3 (Spring-Summer 1996), 38-45.
四、報紙
Butcher, Tim, ‘Marines Plan the Siege of Basra’, Daily Telegraph, 31 Mar. 2003, p. 15.
Catán, Thomas, ‘Iraq Business Deals May Be Invalid, Law Experts Warn’, Financial Times/UK, 29 Oct. 2003, p. 12.
‘Choosing Targets; Iraqi Fighters or Civilians? Hard Decision for Copters’, New York Times, 31 Mar. 2003, p. 5.
Weisman, Steven R., ‘US Set to Name Civilian to Oversee Iraq’, New York Times, 2 May 2003, p. 18.
五、網際網路專文
Genser, Jared, ‘Drum beats louder for UN action on Burma’, The Nation http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2006/05/10/opinion/opinion_30003658.php
Wiseman, Paul, ‘Cluster Bombs Kill in Iraq, Even after Shooting Ends’. USA TODAY http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-12-10-cluster-bomb-cover_x.htm
‘Child Soldiers: Global Report 2004’, Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers http://www.reliefweb.int/library/documents/2004/csucs-glob-17nov.pdf
‘Infantry Conference Summary’, Infantry Online http://www.benning.army.mil/OLP/InfantryOnline/issue_39/art_255.htm
‘LM Report 2006’, Landmine Monitor, http://www.icbl.org/lm/2006/intro/survivor.html#fnB85
‘Landmine Charity MAG Clears Over One Million Mines and Bombs in Iraq Since the War and Says the Work Must Continue’, Relief Web http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/ACOS-64CPWU?OpenDocument
‘Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq’, Human Rights Watch http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/5.htm
‘US/UK Report on the conduct of the Persian Gulf War’, http://www.ndu.edu/library/epubs/cpgw.pdf
‘World Decries Taleban Plan to Raze Age-old Buddhas’, CNN.com/WORLD http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/03/02/afghan.statues.03/index.html
六、參考網站
紅十字國際委員會網站http://www.icrc.org/web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/htmlall/section_ihl_databases?OpenDocument
聯合國Official Documents System of the United Nations http://www.un.org/chinese/documents/index.html
瑞典斯德哥爾摩和平研究中心http://www.sipri.org/contents/conflict/MAC_patterns.html
人權觀察 http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/5.htm
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班
94922002
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094922002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 趙國材zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 彭玉明zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 彭玉明zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 20:35:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 20:35:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 20:35:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094922002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37042-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94922002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 武裝衝突法已成為各交戰國(方)爭取國際支持之重要手段,軍隊執行作戰任務,必須遵守武裝衝突法及國際法的相關規範,始可確保作戰行動的合法性及正當性。陸戰法規是一系列戰爭法規則和慣例的重要歷史淵源,為武裝衝突法之主體。隨著以規範交戰規則為主的海牙法體系與規範人道保護規則為主的日內瓦法體系逐漸整合,陸戰法規除規範作戰使用武器的規則外,其他有關交戰者、敵對行為及軍事佔領等規則均納入1949年日內瓦公約及1977年的兩項附加議定書。
觀察國際社會對陸戰法規實踐的面向,除可從戰史例證中得到驗證外,尚可從童兵、地雷、武裝衝突遺留爆炸物處理及文化資產保護等議題,得以進一步瞭解陸戰法規實踐的全貌。要禁止利用童兵的行為,除了國家行為者應負履約義務外,對非國家行為者侵犯兒童權利行為的制止是當務之急,國際刑事法院應扮演更積極的角色。2003年波灣戰爭中,《禁雷公約》雖未能阻止伊拉克使用人員殺傷雷,但已顯示該公約對非締約國產生的隱性約束力,禁用人員殺傷雷的規範雖未完全實現,但已為多數國家認同,未來可能成為一項習慣國際法。《戰爭遺留爆炸物議定書》雖可為解決武裝衝突結束後平民所面臨的主要威脅提供一項法律制度,但因條約內容強制性不足,成效尚難顯現。目前對文化資深保護的重點在於免遭武裝衝突毀損為主要議題,因武裝衝突而流落異域之文化資產回復或返還,可能成為未來發展之主要議題。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The Law of Armed Conflict has become one of the important means to win the international support for all belligerent. The army must comply with the Law of Armed Conflict in combat, in order to ensure the legitimacy of military operation. The law of war on land has its historical origins for regulations and customary of the Law of War, and also has codified as the main body of the Law of Armed Conflict. The Law of The Hague and the Law of Geneva have been gradually integrated. All these regulations of the law of war on land about combatant, hostilities and military occupation were included in the “Geneva Conventions of 1949” and two “Additional Protocols of 1977”, except the regulations of the use of the weapon.
Observing the different aspects of the law of war on land in the international community from the cases above, furthermore, the issues of “Child Soldier”, “Landmine”, “Explosive Remnants of Armed Conflict” and “Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict”, can help to understand the full view of the practice of the law of war on land. For stopping the use of child soldiers, the obligation of convention should be executed by the state actors, the task of top priority should prevent the infringements of the right of child of the non-state actors, and the International Criminal Court should play a more positive role. In the “Gulf War 2003”, the rule, “Convention on Prohibition of Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Landmines and on Their Destruction”, although it has not prevent Iraq from the use of anti-personnel landmine, had showed the indistinct effect of the convention to the powers in the conflict that may not be parties to the convention. Although the rule of prohibition of use of anti-personnel mines has not completely realized, it had already been approved by most states, and may become one of the international customary in the future. The “Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War annexed to the “Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the 1980 Convention)” provided a legal protection for the civilian after the armed conflict. Its effect was still too difficult to manifest, because the force of provisions of the protocol were insufficient. The protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict focuses on exempting from the damage of cultural property at present, but the issue like how to recover the cultural properties which were pillaged in armed conflicts, would become the main theme in the foreseeable future.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧1
第一節 研究動機與目的 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧1
第二節 研究途徑、方法‧ ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧4
第三節 研究範圍與限制 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧6
第四節 研究架構 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧6
第二章 陸戰法規之沿革‧‧ ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧8
第一節 近代戰爭法起源與陸戰法規的形成 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧8
第二節 陸戰法規「交戰者」規範之演進‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧18
第三節 陸戰法規「敵對行為」規範之演進‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧30
第四節 陸戰法規「軍事佔領」規範之演進‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧42
第五節 小結‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧46
第三章 陸戰法規在武裝衝突中之實踐‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧49
第一節 「交戰者」規範之實踐‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ ‧‧‧ 49
第二節 「作戰手段」規範之實踐‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧59
第三節 「作戰方法」規範之實踐‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧66
第四節 「軍事佔領」規範之實踐‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧71
第五節 小結‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧76
第四章 與陸戰法規相關之議題‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧79
第一節 童兵‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧79
第二節 地雷‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧87
第三節 武裝衝突遺留爆炸物‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧93
第四節 文化資產保護‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧99
第五節 小結‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧108
第五章 總結‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧110
第一節 結論‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧110
第二節 建議‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧114
參考書目‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧118
附錄一:1907年陸戰法規和慣例公約‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧126
附錄二:兒童權利公約關於兒童捲入武裝衝突的任擇議定書‧135
附錄三:關於禁止使用、儲存、生產和轉讓人員殺傷雷及銷毀此種地雷的公約‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧140
附錄四:戰爭遺留爆炸物議定書‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧149
附錄五:武裝衝突情況下保護文化財產公約第二議定書‧‧‧153
表目錄
表1 主要武裝衝突區域分布統計表(1990-2003年)‧‧‧‧‧2
表2 2005年地雷造成傷亡人員統計表‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 88
表3 2005年1月至2006年6月受地雷影響的國家或地區‧‧‧89
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 46564 bytes-
dc.format.extent 87521 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67289 bytes-
dc.format.extent 206554 bytes-
dc.format.extent 541502 bytes-
dc.format.extent 474915 bytes-
dc.format.extent 436416 bytes-
dc.format.extent 183652 bytes-
dc.format.extent 229262 bytes-
dc.format.extent 298874 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094922002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 武裝衝突法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 陸戰法規zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 童兵zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 地雷zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Law of Armed Conflicten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Law of War on Landen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Child Soldieren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Landmineen_US
dc.title (題名) 武裝衝突法中陸戰法規之理論與實踐zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王鐵崖編。《國際法》。北京:法律,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王鐵崖、朱荔蓀、田如萱等編。《戰爭法文獻集》。北京:解放軍,1986 年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞正山。《武裝衝突法》。北京:軍事科學,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高文俊。《韓戰憶往—浴血餘生話人權》。台北:生智文化,2000 年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬繼東編。《生化武器與秘密戰爭》。北京:解放軍文藝,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳榮傳。〈由國際法觀點論武裝衝突事件中文化資產之保護〉,丘宏達教授六秩晉五華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會編,《國際法論文集》。台北:三民,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盛紅生、楊澤偉、秦小軒。《武力的邊界─21世紀前期武裝衝突中的國際法問題研究》。北京:時事,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張景恩。《國際法與戰爭》。北京:國防大學,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊永明。《國際安全與國際法》。台北:元照,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 雷崧生。《日內瓦法典》。台北,中華,1964年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 董霖。《國際公法與國際組織》。台北:台灣商務,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 趙永琛編。《國際刑法約章滙編》。北京:中國人民公安大學,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 端木正。《國際法》。北京:北京大學,1989年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 魏靜芬。《戰爭法學》。台北:社團法人台灣海洋事務策進會,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 叢文勝。《戰爭法原理與實用》。北京:軍事科學,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 叢文勝。《法律戰經典案例評析》。北京:解放軍,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中國人民志願軍政治部編。《中國人民志願軍抗美援朝戰爭政治工作總結》。北京:解放軍出版社,1985年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 軍事社會科學叢書編輯部編。《美伊作戰研究專輯》。台北:政治作戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、譯作zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏爾‧盧梭(C., Rousseau)。《武裝衝突法》,張凝等譯。北京:中國對外翻譯公司,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葛德斯坦(Goldstein, Joshua S.)。《國際關係》(International Relations),歐信宏、胡祖慶合譯。台北:雙葉,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 古特曼(Gutman, Roy)、瑞夫(David Rieff)編。《戰爭的罪行》(Crimes of War),席代岳譯。台北:麥田,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 勞特派特(Lauterpacht, H.)編。《奧本海(L. Oppenheim)國際法:下卷(第一分冊)》王鐵崖、陳鐵強譯。北京:商務印書館,1972年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 奧本海(Oppenheim, L.)。《國際法》(International Law),岑德彰譯。台北:台灣商務印館,1969年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅吉斯(Rogers, Anthony P.V.)、麥赫比(Paul Malherbe)。《中道之師:武裝衝突法手冊》(Fight It Right: Model Manual on the Law of Armed Conflict for Armed Forces),楊紫函、周茂林、林健全等譯。桃園:國防大學,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧梭(Rousseau, J.J.)。《社會契約論》(Du Contract Social),何兆武譯。北京:商務印書館,1980年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王俊南。〈武裝衝突法要義之闡釋〉,《陸軍學術雙月刊》,42卷489期。2006年10月,頁139-151。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王玉強。〈周恩來與朝鮮戰爭戰俘遣返問題〉,《黨的文獻》,4 期。1999 年,頁28-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江瑞林。〈從兩伊戰爭中看核生化武器在未來戰爭中所扮角色〉,《核生化防護季刊》,第50期。1995年10月,頁6-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 冷新宇。〈論徵募兒童兵作為戰爭罪〉,《西安政治學院學報》,19卷2期。2006年4月,頁69-73。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐燄。〈朝鮮戰爭中的戰俘之迷〉,《世界軍事》,2004年3期。2004年3月,頁50-55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高銘暄、王秀梅。〈建立國際刑事法院的法律意義〉,《吉林大學社會科學學報》,第3期。2004年6月,頁16-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賀明。〈中朝與美軍在遣返戰俘問題上的鬥爭〉,《文史精華》,2 期。1996 年,頁4-9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張立。〈僱傭軍的戰爭遊戲〉,《中國科技縱橫》,8期。2004年8月,頁8-17。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭建國。〈從國際法關於戰俘的規定看虐囚事件〉,《襄樊學院學報》,25卷4期。2004年7月,頁65-68。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 叢文勝。〈試析現代戰爭法的幾個基本問題〉,《中國軍事科學》,17卷1期。2004年2月,頁73-81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 四、碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張謨猷。〈禁止化學武器公約之研究〉。國立政治大學外交究所,碩士論文,2004年4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 五、網際網路專文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈志華、李丹慧。〈1953年朝鮮停戰:莫斯科的安排和做法—關於朝鮮停戰談判最後階段的俄國檔案文獻〉。http://www.shenzhihua.net/cxzz/000023_4.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 祖國斌。〈虐待戰俘是違反國際法和公約的嚴重罪行〉。CRI Online國際在線,http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.chinabroadcast.cn/3821/2004/05/12/107@156337.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡瑞麟。〈現代戰場殺手-燃料空氣彈〉。軍事刊物http://past_journal.mnd.gov.tw/%E5%BE%8C%E5%8B%A4%E5%8D%8A%E5%B9%B4%E5%88%8A/Magazinefile/mag31/No31/31-4.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈美國大使談聯合國維和人員得到一年豁免的問題〉。美國參考,http://usinfo.org/mgck/usinfo.state.gov/regional/ea/mgck/archive02/0715icc.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈擔憂出國可能被捕,以高級軍官停止赴英進修〉。中央社,http://www.mnd.gov.tw/modnews/mininews/matter.aspx?PublicID=1821zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈萬處考古點 千名美軍守不住 伊拉克古文物遭竊〉,台灣立報http://publish.lihpao.com/InternationalEducationNews/2005/09/03/05C09023/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈紅十字國際委員會擴大與私營軍事和安全公司的連絡〉。紅十字國際委員會,http://www.icrc.org/web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/html/6QL8XGzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈以軍在黎埋設的地雷炸傷多名排雷專家和醫生〉,新華網,貝魯特2006年11月25日電訊, http://news.gxnews.com.cn/staticpages/20061126/newgx4569061d-885673.shtmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈讓我們終結人員殺傷雷的時代〉,紅十字國際委員會http://www.icrc.org/Web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/html/6QP47Ezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈伊拉克戰爭對文化遺產造成的後果〉,文建會世界遺產知識網,http://wh.cca.gov.tw/tc/learning/learn_1_c.asp?learn_id=284zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 槍械詞匯。http://gunglossary.home.comcast.net/big5/chi_gun_dict_4.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 貳、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、官方文件zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Report of the UN Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict, 10 Nov. 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict in the Sudan, 17 Aug. 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict in Côte d’Ivoire, 25 Oct. 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 37: Tax Strategy for 2003, 19 Sept. 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 39: Foreign Investment, 26 June 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). ORD 46: Amendment of CPA Order 39 on Foreign Investment, 20 Dec. 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. General Assembly Resolution 610(VII), Korea: Reports of the United Nations Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea, 3 Dec. 1952.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. General Assembly Resolution 2603(XXIV), Question of Chemical and Bacteriological (Biological) Weapons, 16 Dec. 1969.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. General Assembly Resolution 2849(XXVI), Development and Environment, 20 Dec. 1971.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. General Assembly Resolution 3264(XXIX), Prohibition of Action to Influence the Environment and Climate for Military and Other Purposes, Incompatible with the Maintenance of International Security, Human Well-being and Health, 9 Dec. 1974.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, the Situation in the Middle East, 22 Nov. 1967.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. Security Council Resolution 1261, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 30 Aug. 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. Security Council Resolution 1314, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 11 Aug. 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. Security Council Resolution 1379, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 20 Nov. 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. Security Council Resolution 1460, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 30 Jan. 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. Security Council Resolution 1539, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 22 Apr. 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) U.N. Security Council Resolution 1539, on the Children and Armed Conflict, 26 July 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benvenisti, Eyal, The International Law of Occupation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borrie, John, Explosive Remnants of War: A Global Survey (London: Landmine Action, 2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boylan, Patrick J., Review of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Paris: UNESCO, 1993).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cave, Rosy, Anthea Lawson and Andrew Sherriff, Cluster Munitions in Albania and Lao PDR (Geneva: UNDIR, 2006).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feilchenfeld, Ernst. H., The International Economic Law of Belligerent Occupation (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1942).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fischer, David. Stopping the Spread of Nuclear Weapons: The Past and the Prospects (London: Routledge, 1992).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gasser, Hans-Peter. ‘International Humanitarian Law – An Introduction’, in Hans Haug (ed.), Humanity for All – The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1993), 22-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Glahn, Gerhard Von, The Occupation of Enemy Territory: A Commentary on the Law and Practice of Belligerent Occupation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave: law and foreign policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2nd edn., 1979).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ingrid, Detter, The Law of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn., 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mccoubry, H., International Humanitarian Law: the Regulation of Armed Conflicts (Hampshire: Gower Pub. Co., 1990).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McDougal, Myres S., and Florention P. Feliciano, Law and Minimum World Public Order : The Legal Regulation and International Coercion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moyes, Richard (ed.), Foreseeable Harm: The Use and Impact of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon: 2006 (London: Landmine Action, 2006).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roberts, David Lloyd, The Law of Armed Conflict Teaching File for Instructors: Lesson 1 –Basic Knowledge (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2002).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rogers, A. P. V., Law on the Battlefield (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosas, Allan, The Legal Status of Prisoners of War: A Study in International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1976).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stone, Julius, Legal Controls of International Conflict: A Treatise on the Dynamics of Disputes and War-law (New York: Rinehart & Co., 1954).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Toman, Jiri, The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Paris: UNESCO, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williams, Sharon A., The International and National Protection of Movable Cultural Property: A Comparative Study (New York: Oceana Publications, 1978).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aldrich, George H., ‘The Law of War on Land’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 90, Issue 1 (Jan. 2000), 42- 63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clement, Etienne, ‘Some Recent Practical Experience in the Implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention’, International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1994), 11-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dennis, Michael J., ‘Newly Adopted Protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the Child’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, No.4 (Oct. 2000), 789-796.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eirinberg, Keith W., ‘The United States Reconsiders the 1954 Hague Convention’, International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1994), 25-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gerson, Allan, ‘War, conquered territory, and military occupation in the contemporary international legal system’, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Summer 1977), 525-556.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldblat, Jozef, ‘The Biological Weapons Convention - An overview’, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 318 (June 1997), 251-265.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harbom, Lotta, & Wallensteen, Peter, ‘Armed Conflict and Its International Dimensions, 1946–2004’, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 42, No. 5 (Sept. 2005), 623-635.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kastenberg, Joshua E., ‘The Legal Regime for Protecting Cultural Property During Armed Conflict’, Air Force Law Review, Vol. 42 (1997), 277-305.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94 (Apr. 2000), 239-277.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meyer, David A., ‘The 1954 Hague Cultural Property Convention and Its Emergence into Customary International Law’, Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 11 (1993), 349-376.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Keefe, Roger, ‘The Meaning of “Cultural Property” under the 1954 Hague Convention’, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. XLVI (1999), 26-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oyer III, Harvey E., ‘The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict-Is it Working? A Case Study: The Persian Gulf War Experience’, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 23 (1999), 62-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scheffer, David, ‘Beyond Occupation Law’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 4 (Oct. 2003), 842-860.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sopf, Davor, ‘Temporary Protection in Europe After 1990: The ‘Right to Remain’ of Genuine Convention Refugees’, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Vol.6 (2001), 109-156.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ticehurst, Rupert, ‘The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, (Apr. 1997), 125-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wright, Quincy, ‘The Meaning of the Pact of Paris’, American Journal of International Law, Vol.27, No.1 (Jan. 1933), 39-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zander, Jean Pascal, ‘The CWC in the Context of the 1925 Geneva Debates’, The Nonproliferation Review, Vol.3, No.3 (Spring-Summer 1996), 38-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 四、報紙zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Butcher, Tim, ‘Marines Plan the Siege of Basra’, Daily Telegraph, 31 Mar. 2003, p. 15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Catán, Thomas, ‘Iraq Business Deals May Be Invalid, Law Experts Warn’, Financial Times/UK, 29 Oct. 2003, p. 12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘Choosing Targets; Iraqi Fighters or Civilians? Hard Decision for Copters’, New York Times, 31 Mar. 2003, p. 5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weisman, Steven R., ‘US Set to Name Civilian to Oversee Iraq’, New York Times, 2 May 2003, p. 18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 五、網際網路專文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Genser, Jared, ‘Drum beats louder for UN action on Burma’, The Nation http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2006/05/10/opinion/opinion_30003658.phpzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wiseman, Paul, ‘Cluster Bombs Kill in Iraq, Even after Shooting Ends’. USA TODAY http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-12-10-cluster-bomb-cover_x.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘Child Soldiers: Global Report 2004’, Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers http://www.reliefweb.int/library/documents/2004/csucs-glob-17nov.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘Infantry Conference Summary’, Infantry Online http://www.benning.army.mil/OLP/InfantryOnline/issue_39/art_255.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘LM Report 2006’, Landmine Monitor, http://www.icbl.org/lm/2006/intro/survivor.html#fnB85zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘Landmine Charity MAG Clears Over One Million Mines and Bombs in Iraq Since the War and Says the Work Must Continue’, Relief Web http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/ACOS-64CPWU?OpenDocumentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq’, Human Rights Watch http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/5.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘US/UK Report on the conduct of the Persian Gulf War’, http://www.ndu.edu/library/epubs/cpgw.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‘World Decries Taleban Plan to Raze Age-old Buddhas’, CNN.com/WORLD http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/03/02/afghan.statues.03/index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 六、參考網站zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 紅十字國際委員會網站http://www.icrc.org/web/chi/sitechi0.nsf/htmlall/section_ihl_databases?OpenDocumentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 聯合國Official Documents System of the United Nations http://www.un.org/chinese/documents/index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 瑞典斯德哥爾摩和平研究中心http://www.sipri.org/contents/conflict/MAC_patterns.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 人權觀察 http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/5.htmzh_TW