學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 模糊系統評估-以高中教科書評選為例
Fuzzy System Evaluation-with an Example of Textbook Selection
作者 劉昌國
Liu, Chang Kuo
貢獻者 吳柏林
劉昌國
Liu, Chang Kuo
關鍵詞 教科書評選
模糊眾數
模糊相對權重
模糊評估
textbook selection
fuzzy sample mode
fuzzy relation weight
fuzzy evaluation
日期 2007
上傳時間 19-Sep-2009 12:07:43 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究的主要目的,在應用模糊理論,建立改進傳統系統分析模式。並以高中教科書評選為例,首先使用評鑑因素重要程度模糊問卷及教科書評鑑表,建立因素模糊相對權重矩陣與模糊評估矩陣,同時以模糊眾數和模糊評估與傳統方法進行比較分析。我們經由實際評選發現,應用模糊評選教科書,比傳統評選教科書來得合理。在尋求適當的共識時,模糊統計較能適時反應出人們實際的想法。
The purpose of this study is to develop a system analysis by fuzzy theory. A comparison was made between fuzzy sample mode, fuzzy evaluation and the conventional method about textbook selection. In order to establish the factor fuzzy relation weight matrix and to estimate fuzzy evaluation matrix, we use the fuzzy weight and evaluation questionnaire first. It was found, by way of the actual evaluation, that the application of fuzzy evaluation is better than the traditional evaluation. While looking for appropriate consensus, fuzzy statistics is a better reflection of popular idea.
參考文獻 中文部分:
[1] 王平、羅濟群(2007) 企業智財經營平台評選決策模式之建立–模糊群體決策理論應用。管理與系統,第十四卷第三期
[2] 吳柏林(2003)現代統計學。台北:五南書局
[3] 吳柏林(2005) 模糊統計導論–方法與應用。 台北:五南書局
[4] 吳柏林、曾能芳(2002) 模糊迴歸參數估計及在景氣對策信號之分析應用。 中國統計學報,36(4),399-420
[5] 陳振東、許錫美(1994) 多位專家模糊評估值整合方法之研究。 中華民國第二屆模糊理論與應用研討會
[6] 陳貞廷(2002) 現行大台北地區高中英語教科書之選用。國立臺灣師範大學英語研究所碩士論文
[7] 康瀚文(2003) 臺北縣市國民中學九年一貫課程教科書選用制度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文
[8] 賀克勤、唐國銘、吳典黻、古思明、吳炎崑(2000) 武器系統建案分析多層級準則模糊評估模式。2000年科技與管理學術研討會論文集 pp103-114
[9] 馮國臣、任麗偉(2007) 模糊理論_基礎與應用。 台北:新文京開發
[10] 黃添財、張耀輝(2005) 圖書館服務品質模糊評估模式實証研究,龍華學報,第十八期
[11] 黃敬仁(2001) 系統分析。 台北:碁峰資訊
[12] 楊亨利、傅豐玲、諶家蘭、李坤清(2001) 系統分析與設計。 台北:空大
英文部分:
[1] Chih-Sen Wu, Der-Chiang Li, Tung-I Tsai (2006) Applying the fuzzy ranking method to the shifting bottleneck procedure to solve scheduling problems of uncertainty. The International Journal of Advanced Manufactoring Technology, vol 31:98-106
[2] Jing-Rong Chang, Ching-Hsue Cheng, Kuo-Hsiang Teng and Chen-Yi Kuo (2007) Selecting weapon system using relative distance metric method. Soft Computing, vol 11:573-584
[3] Jinying Sun,Yong Wu,Youzhi Hao and Zhen Dai (2006) Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model and Influence Factors Analysis on Comprehensive Performance of Green Buildings. Renewable Energy Resources and a Greener Future .Vol.VIII-4-2
[4] K.Ganesan.P.Veeramani(2006) Fuzzy linear programs with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Annuals Operations Research, vol 143:305-315
[5] Klir,G.F. and Folger,T.A.(1988) Fuzzy Sets,Uncertainly and Information. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall.
[6] Nguyen, H. T. & Wu, B. ( 2006) Fundamentals of statistics with fuzzy data. New York : Springer.
[7] Sunghyun Weon and Jinil Kim (2001) Learning Achievement Evaluation Strategy Using Fuzzy Membership Function. 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,Session T3A.
[8] Shi-Jay Chen, Shyi-Ming Chen (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Applied intelligence, vol 26:1-11
[9] Tanaka, H., Uejima, S. and Asai, K. (1980) Fuzzy Linear Regression Model. International Congress on Applied Systems Research and Cybernetics. Aculpoco, Mexico.
[10] Tanaka, H., Uejima, S. and Asai, K. (1982) Linear Regression Analysis with Fuzzy model. IEEE Trans. SystemsMan Cybernet, vol SMC12, 903-907.
[11] Zadeh,L.A.(1965) Fuzzy Sets.Information and Cnotrol,8,338-353.
[12] Zimmermann,H.J.(1991) Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Boston:Kluwer Academic.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
應用數學研究所
94751016
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094751016
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳柏林zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 劉昌國zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Liu, Chang Kuoen_US
dc.creator (作者) 劉昌國zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Liu, Chang Kuoen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-Sep-2009 12:07:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Sep-2009 12:07:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Sep-2009 12:07:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094751016en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37090-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 應用數學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94751016zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究的主要目的,在應用模糊理論,建立改進傳統系統分析模式。並以高中教科書評選為例,首先使用評鑑因素重要程度模糊問卷及教科書評鑑表,建立因素模糊相對權重矩陣與模糊評估矩陣,同時以模糊眾數和模糊評估與傳統方法進行比較分析。我們經由實際評選發現,應用模糊評選教科書,比傳統評選教科書來得合理。在尋求適當的共識時,模糊統計較能適時反應出人們實際的想法。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study is to develop a system analysis by fuzzy theory. A comparison was made between fuzzy sample mode, fuzzy evaluation and the conventional method about textbook selection. In order to establish the factor fuzzy relation weight matrix and to estimate fuzzy evaluation matrix, we use the fuzzy weight and evaluation questionnaire first. It was found, by way of the actual evaluation, that the application of fuzzy evaluation is better than the traditional evaluation. While looking for appropriate consensus, fuzzy statistics is a better reflection of popular idea.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 1.前言 2
2.模糊評估系統分析 4
2.1模糊系統 6
2.2決定模糊權重 7
2.3模糊統計量 8
3.模糊評估過程 11
3.1模糊評估 11
3.2對於連續型模糊數評鑑因子之分析 11
4.實例探討 16
4.1傳統回答 16
4.2模糊回答 17
5.結論 26
6.參考文獻 27
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 43672 bytes-
dc.format.extent 64154 bytes-
dc.format.extent 53298 bytes-
dc.format.extent 42920 bytes-
dc.format.extent 112032 bytes-
dc.format.extent 189899 bytes-
dc.format.extent 155336 bytes-
dc.format.extent 182833 bytes-
dc.format.extent 61626 bytes-
dc.format.extent 77175 bytes-
dc.format.extent 146281 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094751016en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教科書評選zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 模糊眾數zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 模糊相對權重zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 模糊評估zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) textbook selectionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) fuzzy sample modeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) fuzzy relation weighten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) fuzzy evaluationen_US
dc.title (題名) 模糊系統評估-以高中教科書評選為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Fuzzy System Evaluation-with an Example of Textbook Selectionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [1] 王平、羅濟群(2007) 企業智財經營平台評選決策模式之建立–模糊群體決策理論應用。管理與系統,第十四卷第三期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [2] 吳柏林(2003)現代統計學。台北:五南書局zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [3] 吳柏林(2005) 模糊統計導論–方法與應用。 台北:五南書局zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [4] 吳柏林、曾能芳(2002) 模糊迴歸參數估計及在景氣對策信號之分析應用。 中國統計學報,36(4),399-420zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [5] 陳振東、許錫美(1994) 多位專家模糊評估值整合方法之研究。 中華民國第二屆模糊理論與應用研討會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [6] 陳貞廷(2002) 現行大台北地區高中英語教科書之選用。國立臺灣師範大學英語研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [7] 康瀚文(2003) 臺北縣市國民中學九年一貫課程教科書選用制度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [8] 賀克勤、唐國銘、吳典黻、古思明、吳炎崑(2000) 武器系統建案分析多層級準則模糊評估模式。2000年科技與管理學術研討會論文集 pp103-114zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [9] 馮國臣、任麗偉(2007) 模糊理論_基礎與應用。 台北:新文京開發zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [10] 黃添財、張耀輝(2005) 圖書館服務品質模糊評估模式實証研究,龍華學報,第十八期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [11] 黃敬仁(2001) 系統分析。 台北:碁峰資訊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [12] 楊亨利、傅豐玲、諶家蘭、李坤清(2001) 系統分析與設計。 台北:空大zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [1] Chih-Sen Wu, Der-Chiang Li, Tung-I Tsai (2006) Applying the fuzzy ranking method to the shifting bottleneck procedure to solve scheduling problems of uncertainty. The International Journal of Advanced Manufactoring Technology, vol 31:98-106zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [2] Jing-Rong Chang, Ching-Hsue Cheng, Kuo-Hsiang Teng and Chen-Yi Kuo (2007) Selecting weapon system using relative distance metric method. Soft Computing, vol 11:573-584zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [3] Jinying Sun,Yong Wu,Youzhi Hao and Zhen Dai (2006) Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model and Influence Factors Analysis on Comprehensive Performance of Green Buildings. Renewable Energy Resources and a Greener Future .Vol.VIII-4-2zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [4] K.Ganesan.P.Veeramani(2006) Fuzzy linear programs with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Annuals Operations Research, vol 143:305-315zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [5] Klir,G.F. and Folger,T.A.(1988) Fuzzy Sets,Uncertainly and Information. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [6] Nguyen, H. T. & Wu, B. ( 2006) Fundamentals of statistics with fuzzy data. New York : Springer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [7] Sunghyun Weon and Jinil Kim (2001) Learning Achievement Evaluation Strategy Using Fuzzy Membership Function. 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,Session T3A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [8] Shi-Jay Chen, Shyi-Ming Chen (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Applied intelligence, vol 26:1-11zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [9] Tanaka, H., Uejima, S. and Asai, K. (1980) Fuzzy Linear Regression Model. International Congress on Applied Systems Research and Cybernetics. Aculpoco, Mexico.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [10] Tanaka, H., Uejima, S. and Asai, K. (1982) Linear Regression Analysis with Fuzzy model. IEEE Trans. SystemsMan Cybernet, vol SMC12, 903-907.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [11] Zadeh,L.A.(1965) Fuzzy Sets.Information and Cnotrol,8,338-353.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [12] Zimmermann,H.J.(1991) Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Boston:Kluwer Academic.zh_TW