學術產出-學位論文

題名 華德福教育神話教學蘊義之研究
作者 王士誠
貢獻者 馮朝霖
Fong, Tsao Lin
王士誠
關鍵詞 華德福教育
人智學
神話
人類圖像
Waldorf Pedagogy
Anthroposophy
myth
human picture
日期 2008
上傳時間 19-九月-2009 12:40:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 神話教學是華德福教育獨有的教學活動,其主張適時地接觸神話有助於兒童的發展。本研究即在人智學的理論基礎上,探討該教學活動,冀揭露其蘊義。具體地說,本研究探討以下問題:

1.人智學觀點下的神話為何?(what)
2.神話何以(why)有助兒童之發展?
3.神話如何(how)促進兒童之發展?
本研究採德國學者Danner的「教育詮釋學」為研究方法,首先闡明神話學中各重要學派的神話觀,與人智學人類圖像的「四體」,進而分析Rudolf Steiner的神話觀點及其教育意涵,以回應前列問題。準此,本研究提出四項結論:

1.Steiner的人智學視神話為作為小宇宙的人類與大宇宙之連結。
2.人類身心靈發展的精神意義可從神話中追溯。
3.接觸神話對人類身心靈的發展有直接的促進作用
4.神話使人再度連結於世界、重拾生命的精神意義,此為華德福教育所欲達致者。
最後,由對本研究的省思出發,提出後續研究的建議。
Myth education is a perculiar educational activity by Waldorf Pedagogy. It suggests that accessing myths at the right time is helpful to the development of children. Base on the theory of Anthroposophy, this study explores this educational activity to expose its significance. To be specific, the study explores following questions:

1.What is the myth from the viewpoint of Anthroposophy?
2.Why is the myth helpful to the development of children?
3.How does the myth facilitate the development of children?
Taking the German Scholar Danner’s “Pedagogic Hermeneutic” as reschearch method, this study illuminates the viewpoints of myth of various important schools of mythology and the “four bodies” in the human picture of Anthroposophy at first. Futhermore, this study analizes Rudolf Steiner’s viewpoint of myth and its educational meaning to answer the questions listed above. Accordingly, four conclusions are put forward:

1.The myth is taken as the connection between human beings as a small cosmos and the big cosmos according to Steiner’s Anthroposophy.

2.The spiritual meaning of the development of the body, the spirit, and the soul of human being could be traced in the myth.

3.The myth could affect the development of the body, the spirit, and the soul of human directly .

4.The myth makes man reconnected to the world and regain the spiritual meaning of life. It is what Waldorf Pedagogy attempts to achieve.

Finally, according to the reflection on this study, the researcher makes some suggestions for follow-up researches.
參考文獻 中文部分:
王茜瑩(1999)。Rudolf Steiner幼兒教育思想之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文。
伍至學(1996)。人性與符號形式。台北市:中華民國中山學術文化基金會。
宋光宇(1986)。蠻荒的訪客──馬凌諾斯基。台北市:允晨文化。
李福清(2000)。神話與鬼話。北京市:社會科學文獻出版社。
李慕如(2000)。兒童文學。高雄市:復文。
林文寶(1998)釋童話。兒童文學學刊,創刊號,55-66。
林惠祥(1995)。神話論。台北市:臺灣商務印書館。
祝士媛(1989)。兒童文學。台北市:新學識文教出版中心。
胡淑裕(2005)。神話.孩子.我。人哲,7,24-32。
洪汛濤(1989)。童話學。台北市:富春文化。
洪菁菁(2003)。神話在教育情境中的意義與應用:以三個原住民社區為例。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
倪鳴香(2003)。《葉子長出來,要紮多久的根:尋華德福教育(Waldorfpädagogik)在台灣行動的足跡》計畫申請書。台北市:教育部顧問室創造力計畫推動辦公室。
倪鳴香(2005)。《虛實間的對話與邂逅:華德福教育社群社會建置工程行動研究》計畫申請書。台北市:教育部顧問室創造力計畫推動辦公室。
高宣揚(1990)。結構主義。台北市:遠流。
高樂田(2004)。神話之光與神話之鏡。北京市:中國社會科學出版社。
梁福鎮(2000)。詮釋學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於:中正大學教育學研究所(編)(2000),質的教育研究方法(頁221-238)。高雄市:麗文文化。
郭朝清(2003)。華德福教育中的北歐神話(I)。人哲,2,14-18。
黃武雄(2004)。學校在窗外。台北縣:左岸文化。
黃曉星(1998)。邁向個性的教育:一位留學英、美學者解讀華德福教育。香港新界:香港中文大學。
馮川(2001)。重返精神家園:關於榮格。台北市:笙易文化。
馮契(編)(1992)。哲學大辭典。上海:上海辭典出版社。
張春興(1998)。現代心理學。台北市:東華書局。
馮朝霖(2002)。另類教育與全球思考。教育研究月刊,92,33-42。
馮朝霖(2004)。《在人智學與文化經驗的對話間開展:華德福的家校關係圖像與參與意識轉化行動研究》計畫申請書。台北市:教育部顧問室創造力計畫推動辦公室。
楊深坑(1988)。理論‧詮釋與實踐。台北市:師大書苑。
楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。台北市:心理。
劉智雄(2004)。華德福教學。台北市:台北市教師研習中心。
劉耀中(1995)。榮格。台北市:東大圖書公司。
鄭意弘(2004)孩子自我意識的醒覺──舊約聖經中的人類圖像。人哲,4,16-18。
關永中(1997)。神話與時間。台北市:中華民國中山學術文化基金會。
蘇鈺楠(2006)。斯泰納《人類經驗的基礎》教育涵義研究。國立台中教育大學國民教育學系碩士論文。
中文譯書部分:
高橋弘子著,劉禧琴、吳旻芬編譯(1997)。日本華德福幼稚園:實踐健康的兒童教育。台北縣:光佑文化。
Cassirer, E.著,范進、楊君游、柯錦華譯(1992)。國家的神話。台北市:桂冠。
Cassirer, E.著,黃龍保、周振選譯(1992)。神話思維。北京:中國社會科學。
Cassirer, E.著,甘陽譯(2004)。人論。上海:上海譯文。
Hemleben, J.著,宣誠譯(1980)。華佗夫實驗學校之父:魯道夫.史坦納傳。台北市:國立編譯館。
May, R.著,朱侃如譯(2003)。哭喊神話。台北縣:立緒文化。
Mulder, H.著,詹雅智譯(2003)。人類的本質。人哲,3,5-9。
Nietzsche, F.著,劉崎譯(2007)。悲劇的誕生。台北市:志文。
Wilkinson, R.著,余振民譯(1997)。教育的藝術。台北縣:光佑文化。
外文部分:
Barthes, R.(1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bascom, W.(1984). The Forms of Folklore. In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 5-29). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Carlgren, F. (1986). Education Towards Freedom : Rudolf Steiner Education : A Survey of the Work of Waldorf Schools throughout the World. East Grinstead : Langthorn Press.
Frazer, J. G. (1990). The Golden Bough : A Study in Magic and Religion . London and Basingstoke : Macmillan.
Hall, C. S. & Nordby, V. J. (1973).A Primier of Jungian Psychology. New York: New American Library.
Honko, L(1984).The Problem of Defining Myth . In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 41-52). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jung, C. G. (1968). The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1969). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, v. 7 (H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler, Ed.). New York : Pantheon Books.
Jung, C. G. (1969a). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, v. 9(I) (H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler, Ed.). New York : Pantheon Books.
Kirk, G. S.(1970).Myth: Its Meanings and Functions in Ancient and Other Cultures.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kirk, G. S.(1984). On defining myths. In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 53-61). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural Anthropology (C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf, Trans). New York : Basic Books.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1987). Anthropology and Myth : Lectures, 1951-1982 (R. Willis, Trans.). New York, NY, USA : Blackwell.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1989). Myth and Meaning. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific : An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea.
London : G. Routledge & Sons, ltd.
Malinowski, B.(1948). Magic, Science and Religion : and Other Essays. Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday.
Mintz, J. ( Ed. ) (1994). The Handbook of Alternative Education. New York : Macmillan Pub. Co.
Mueller- Vollmer, K. (Ed.) (1985). The Hermeneutics Reader. Padstow: T. J. Press.
Rogerson, J. W.(1984). Slipery Words: Myth. In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 62-71). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Steiner, R (1921). The Spiritual Guidance of Mankind. (H. Collison, Ed.)
London : Anthroposopic Society of Great Britain.
Steiner, R.(1968). The Essential of Education. (J. Darrell, Ed.) London : Steiner Book Centre.
Steiner, R.(1968a). The Roots of Education. (H. Fox Ed.) London : Steiner Book Centre.
Steiner, R.(1978). Ancient Myths: Their Meaning and Connection with Evolution. Toronto : Steiner Book Centre.
Steiner, R.(1988). The Child’s Changing Consciousness and Waldorf Education. (R. Everett, Trans.)London : Steiner Book Centre.
Steiner, R.(1989). Education and Modern Spiritual Life. New York : Garber Communications.(Original work published 1928)
Steiner, R.(1996a).The Education of the Child: in the light of Anthroposophy. (George & Mary Adams, Trans.) London : Steiner Book Centre.
Steiner, R.(1996b). The Foundations of Human Experience. (R. F. Lathe & N. P. Whittaker, Trans.) London : Steiner Book Centre.
Steiner, Rudolf (2006). Christianity as Mystical Fact. (A. Welburn, Trans.) Great Barrington, Mass. : SteinerBooks.
網路資源部分:
Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Three. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-hree/110mw7eus832b/19#
Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Four. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-four/110mw7eus832b/20#
Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Five. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-five/110mw7eus832b/21#
Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Six. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-six/110mw7eus832b/22#
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
94152016
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094152016
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 馮朝霖zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Fong, Tsao Linen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 王士誠zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 王士誠zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-九月-2009 12:40:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-九月-2009 12:40:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-九月-2009 12:40:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0094152016en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37199-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94152016zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 神話教學是華德福教育獨有的教學活動,其主張適時地接觸神話有助於兒童的發展。本研究即在人智學的理論基礎上,探討該教學活動,冀揭露其蘊義。具體地說,本研究探討以下問題:

1.人智學觀點下的神話為何?(what)
2.神話何以(why)有助兒童之發展?
3.神話如何(how)促進兒童之發展?
本研究採德國學者Danner的「教育詮釋學」為研究方法,首先闡明神話學中各重要學派的神話觀,與人智學人類圖像的「四體」,進而分析Rudolf Steiner的神話觀點及其教育意涵,以回應前列問題。準此,本研究提出四項結論:

1.Steiner的人智學視神話為作為小宇宙的人類與大宇宙之連結。
2.人類身心靈發展的精神意義可從神話中追溯。
3.接觸神話對人類身心靈的發展有直接的促進作用
4.神話使人再度連結於世界、重拾生命的精神意義,此為華德福教育所欲達致者。
最後,由對本研究的省思出發,提出後續研究的建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Myth education is a perculiar educational activity by Waldorf Pedagogy. It suggests that accessing myths at the right time is helpful to the development of children. Base on the theory of Anthroposophy, this study explores this educational activity to expose its significance. To be specific, the study explores following questions:

1.What is the myth from the viewpoint of Anthroposophy?
2.Why is the myth helpful to the development of children?
3.How does the myth facilitate the development of children?
Taking the German Scholar Danner’s “Pedagogic Hermeneutic” as reschearch method, this study illuminates the viewpoints of myth of various important schools of mythology and the “four bodies” in the human picture of Anthroposophy at first. Futhermore, this study analizes Rudolf Steiner’s viewpoint of myth and its educational meaning to answer the questions listed above. Accordingly, four conclusions are put forward:

1.The myth is taken as the connection between human beings as a small cosmos and the big cosmos according to Steiner’s Anthroposophy.

2.The spiritual meaning of the development of the body, the spirit, and the soul of human being could be traced in the myth.

3.The myth could affect the development of the body, the spirit, and the soul of human directly .

4.The myth makes man reconnected to the world and regain the spiritual meaning of life. It is what Waldorf Pedagogy attempts to achieve.

Finally, according to the reflection on this study, the researcher makes some suggestions for follow-up researches.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………… 1
第二節 華德福教育及其神話教學概述……………………… 6
第三節 研究目的與範圍……………………………………… 13
第四節 研究方法與限制……………………………………… 16
第五節 重要名詞辨析………………………………………… 19

第二章 神話概念的分析………………………………………………… 22
第一節 神話與其相似敘事類型之辨析……………………… 22
第二節 神話:遊移不定的敘說……………………………… 25
第三節 不同學派觀點下的神話……………………………… 29

第三章 人類的本質與教育原則──人智學的觀點…………………… 42
第一節 人類本質的四體……………………………………… 43
第二節 四體的轉化…………………………………………… 48
第三節 從人類的本質看教育………………………………… 53

第四章 Steiner人智學觀點下的神話………………………………… 59
第一節 Steiner論三大神話體系…………………………… 61
第二節 神話與人類的意識演化…………………………… 69
第三節 神話與人類的身心靈發展………………………… 76

第五章 華德福神話教學之教育意涵………………………………… 80
第一節 教育與人類的老化………………………………… 81
第二節 教育與人類的二元性……………………………… 85
第三節 教育與世界之謎…………………………………… 91

第六章 結論與建議…………………………………………………… 97
第一節 結論………………………………………………… 97
第二節 建議………………………………………………… 102

參考文獻………………………………………………………………… 106

表次
《表一》四體之發展與三段七年說之對照…………………………… 53
《表二》五個後亞特蘭斯紀元中人類意識之演化…………………… 73

圖次
《圖一》人類物質體構造:圓球與彎月……………………………… 86
《圖二》人類物質體構造:圓球、彎月與月面蝕缺………………… 87
《圖三》宇宙物質的流入與流出……………………………………… 93
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 136527 bytes-
dc.format.extent 237135 bytes-
dc.format.extent 228661 bytes-
dc.format.extent 358777 bytes-
dc.format.extent 555923 bytes-
dc.format.extent 525689 bytes-
dc.format.extent 538323 bytes-
dc.format.extent 481231 bytes-
dc.format.extent 525521 bytes-
dc.format.extent 326995 bytes-
dc.format.extent 301879 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094152016en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 華德福教育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人智學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 神話zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人類圖像zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Waldorf Pedagogyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Anthroposophyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) mythen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) human pictureen_US
dc.title (題名) 華德福教育神話教學蘊義之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王茜瑩(1999)。Rudolf Steiner幼兒教育思想之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 伍至學(1996)。人性與符號形式。台北市:中華民國中山學術文化基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 宋光宇(1986)。蠻荒的訪客──馬凌諾斯基。台北市:允晨文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李福清(2000)。神話與鬼話。北京市:社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李慕如(2000)。兒童文學。高雄市:復文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林文寶(1998)釋童話。兒童文學學刊,創刊號,55-66。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林惠祥(1995)。神話論。台北市:臺灣商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 祝士媛(1989)。兒童文學。台北市:新學識文教出版中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡淑裕(2005)。神話.孩子.我。人哲,7,24-32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪汛濤(1989)。童話學。台北市:富春文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪菁菁(2003)。神話在教育情境中的意義與應用:以三個原住民社區為例。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪鳴香(2003)。《葉子長出來,要紮多久的根:尋華德福教育(Waldorfpädagogik)在台灣行動的足跡》計畫申請書。台北市:教育部顧問室創造力計畫推動辦公室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪鳴香(2005)。《虛實間的對話與邂逅:華德福教育社群社會建置工程行動研究》計畫申請書。台北市:教育部顧問室創造力計畫推動辦公室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高宣揚(1990)。結構主義。台北市:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高樂田(2004)。神話之光與神話之鏡。北京市:中國社會科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁福鎮(2000)。詮釋學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於:中正大學教育學研究所(編)(2000),質的教育研究方法(頁221-238)。高雄市:麗文文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭朝清(2003)。華德福教育中的北歐神話(I)。人哲,2,14-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃武雄(2004)。學校在窗外。台北縣:左岸文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃曉星(1998)。邁向個性的教育:一位留學英、美學者解讀華德福教育。香港新界:香港中文大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮川(2001)。重返精神家園:關於榮格。台北市:笙易文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮契(編)(1992)。哲學大辭典。上海:上海辭典出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張春興(1998)。現代心理學。台北市:東華書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮朝霖(2002)。另類教育與全球思考。教育研究月刊,92,33-42。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮朝霖(2004)。《在人智學與文化經驗的對話間開展:華德福的家校關係圖像與參與意識轉化行動研究》計畫申請書。台北市:教育部顧問室創造力計畫推動辦公室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊深坑(1988)。理論‧詮釋與實踐。台北市:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉智雄(2004)。華德福教學。台北市:台北市教師研習中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉耀中(1995)。榮格。台北市:東大圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭意弘(2004)孩子自我意識的醒覺──舊約聖經中的人類圖像。人哲,4,16-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 關永中(1997)。神話與時間。台北市:中華民國中山學術文化基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇鈺楠(2006)。斯泰納《人類經驗的基礎》教育涵義研究。國立台中教育大學國民教育學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文譯書部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高橋弘子著,劉禧琴、吳旻芬編譯(1997)。日本華德福幼稚園:實踐健康的兒童教育。台北縣:光佑文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cassirer, E.著,范進、楊君游、柯錦華譯(1992)。國家的神話。台北市:桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cassirer, E.著,黃龍保、周振選譯(1992)。神話思維。北京:中國社會科學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cassirer, E.著,甘陽譯(2004)。人論。上海:上海譯文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hemleben, J.著,宣誠譯(1980)。華佗夫實驗學校之父:魯道夫.史坦納傳。台北市:國立編譯館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) May, R.著,朱侃如譯(2003)。哭喊神話。台北縣:立緒文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mulder, H.著,詹雅智譯(2003)。人類的本質。人哲,3,5-9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nietzsche, F.著,劉崎譯(2007)。悲劇的誕生。台北市:志文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilkinson, R.著,余振民譯(1997)。教育的藝術。台北縣:光佑文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 外文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barthes, R.(1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bascom, W.(1984). The Forms of Folklore. In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 5-29). Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carlgren, F. (1986). Education Towards Freedom : Rudolf Steiner Education : A Survey of the Work of Waldorf Schools throughout the World. East Grinstead : Langthorn Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Frazer, J. G. (1990). The Golden Bough : A Study in Magic and Religion . London and Basingstoke : Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, C. S. & Nordby, V. J. (1973).A Primier of Jungian Psychology. New York: New American Library.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Honko, L(1984).The Problem of Defining Myth . In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 41-52). Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jung, C. G. (1968). The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jung, C. G. (1969). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, v. 7 (H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler, Ed.). New York : Pantheon Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jung, C. G. (1969a). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, v. 9(I) (H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler, Ed.). New York : Pantheon Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kirk, G. S.(1970).Myth: Its Meanings and Functions in Ancient and Other Cultures.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kirk, G. S.(1984). On defining myths. In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 53-61). Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural Anthropology (C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf, Trans). New York : Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levi-Strauss, C. (1987). Anthropology and Myth : Lectures, 1951-1982 (R. Willis, Trans.). New York, NY, USA : Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levi-Strauss, C. (1989). Myth and Meaning. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific : An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) London : G. Routledge & Sons, ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Malinowski, B.(1948). Magic, Science and Religion : and Other Essays. Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mintz, J. ( Ed. ) (1994). The Handbook of Alternative Education. New York : Macmillan Pub. Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mueller- Vollmer, K. (Ed.) (1985). The Hermeneutics Reader. Padstow: T. J. Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rogerson, J. W.(1984). Slipery Words: Myth. In A. Dundes(Ed.), Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth(pp. 62-71). Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R (1921). The Spiritual Guidance of Mankind. (H. Collison, Ed.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) London : Anthroposopic Society of Great Britain.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R.(1968). The Essential of Education. (J. Darrell, Ed.) London : Steiner Book Centre.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R.(1968a). The Roots of Education. (H. Fox Ed.) London : Steiner Book Centre.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R.(1978). Ancient Myths: Their Meaning and Connection with Evolution. Toronto : Steiner Book Centre.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R.(1988). The Child’s Changing Consciousness and Waldorf Education. (R. Everett, Trans.)London : Steiner Book Centre.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R.(1989). Education and Modern Spiritual Life. New York : Garber Communications.(Original work published 1928)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R.(1996a).The Education of the Child: in the light of Anthroposophy. (George & Mary Adams, Trans.) London : Steiner Book Centre.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, R.(1996b). The Foundations of Human Experience. (R. F. Lathe & N. P. Whittaker, Trans.) London : Steiner Book Centre.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, Rudolf (2006). Christianity as Mystical Fact. (A. Welburn, Trans.) Great Barrington, Mass. : SteinerBooks.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 網路資源部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Three. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-hree/110mw7eus832b/19#zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Four. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-four/110mw7eus832b/20#zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Five. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-five/110mw7eus832b/21#zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartz, E. (2009, March 18). The Waldorf Curriculum: Grade Six. Retrieved from http://knol.google.com/k/eugene-schwartz/the-waldorf-curriculum-grade-six/110mw7eus832b/22#zh_TW