dc.contributor.advisor | 陳木金 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 王志翔 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 王志翔 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 12:43:58 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 12:43:58 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 12:43:58 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095157004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37220 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 幼兒教育所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 95157004 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究旨在瞭解臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質與團隊領導能力之內涵與現況,探討其兩者之間的關係,進而探討臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質對團隊領導能力的影響。 本研究方法主要為訪談法以及問卷調查法,問卷調查樣本以臺北市公立幼稚園園長及教師為研究對象,共500位,樣本回收290份,回收率為58%,可用樣本為287份,可用率為57.4%。研究工具為「臺北市公立幼稚園園長團隊領導能力調查問卷」,主要包括兩大部分,首先是參考Saucier(1994)所編製的「Mini-Markers」(五大人格特質精簡量表),經翻譯與題意修正後發展成適用於國內的「臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質量表」,第二,則是自編之「臺北市公立幼稚園園長團隊領導能力量表」。本研究所使用的統計方法包含描述性統計分析、單因子變異數分析(One-way ANOVA)、皮爾森積差相關(Pearson’s product -moment correlation)、逐步多元迴歸分析(Stepwise Multiple Regression)等方法進行分析。根據研究結果與分析後歸納之研究結論如下:一、臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質與團隊領導能力的內涵及現況(一)臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質包含活潑外向、友善隨和、負責認真、情緒穩定、經驗敞開等五大向度;其整體和分向度得分均為中上,其中以「友善隨和」得分最高,「經驗敞開」得分最低。(二)臺北市公立幼稚園園長團隊領導能力包含核心領導能力、團隊塑造能力、人際智能與問題解決能力等三大向度;其整體和分向度得分均為中上,其中以「人際智能與問題解決能力」得分最高,「團隊塑造能力」得分最低。二、不同背景變項在臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質與團隊領導能力之差異情形(一)不同背景變項在臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質的得分方面:研究發現在最高學歷、園長年資及園所規模有顯著差異,年齡和服務年資沒有顯著差異。(二)不同背景變項在臺北市公立幼稚園園長團隊領導能力的得分方面:研究發現在園所規模有顯著差異,而年齡、最高學歷、服務年資、園長年資等方面無顯著差異。三、臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質與團隊領導能力之相關情形臺北市公立幼稚園園長整體人格特質與整體團隊領導能力之間呈顯著高度正相關(r=.810,p<.01),人格特質各分向度與團隊領導能力各分向度之間皆呈顯著正相關。四、臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質對團隊領導能力之預測情形臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質之經驗敞開、負責認真、友善隨和、活潑外向等聯合四個向度對整體團隊領導能力、核心領導能力、團隊塑造能力有顯著的預測力,而經驗敞開、友善隨和及負責認真等聯合三個向度對人際智能與問題解決能力有顯著的預測力,其中團隊領導能力及其分向度皆以經驗敞開最具預測力。 最後,本研究根據研究發現,提出相關建議,俾供臺北市教育行政機關、臺北市公立幼稚園園長以及後續研究參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The main purpose of this study was to investigate personality traits and team leadership competencies of directors for public kindergarten in Taipei City, and to explore the relationship between personality traits and team leadership competencies, and to discuss personality traits how to influence team leadership competencies. The survey method included interview and questionnaires investigation. Participants in this study were teachers and directors for public kindergarten in Taipei City, and the number of participants were 500, and 290 samples(58%) were retrieved, and 287 valid samples(57.4%) were used in this study. The measures included Mini –Markers that made by Saucier (1994) and team leadership competencies questionnaire that made by author. Data were analyzed by description statistics, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product -moment correlation and Stepwise Multiple Regression. Based on the statistics analysis of the questionnaire, this study finds reaches the following results:A.In the aspect of personality traits and team leadership competencies of directors for public kindergarten in Taipei City:1.The personality traits include five parts: (1) Extraversion, (2) Agreeableness,(3) Conscientiousness,(4) Emotional stability,(5) Openness to Experience. The perception of directors and teachers were above average agreement of the five parts. For directors, the best dimension is “Agreeableness”, and the worst dimension is “Openness to Experience”.2.The team leadership competencies include three parts: (1) Core Leadership,(2) Team Building,(3) Interpersonal Intelligence and Problem-Solving. The perception of directors and teachers were above average agreement of the three parts. For directors, the best dimension is “Interpersonal Intelligence and Problem-Solving”, and the worst dimension is “Team Building”.B.The influences of personality traits and team leadership competencies of directors for public kindergarten in Taipei City:1.Personality Traits: highest educational degree, years of director service, and school size have significant influences on personality traits. But director’s age and years of service do not have any significant influences.2.Team Leadership Competencies: school size has significant influences on team leadership competencies. But director’s age, highest educational degree, years of service, and years of director service do not have any significant influences.C.In the aspect of relationship between personality traits and team leadership competencies of directors for public kindergarten in Taipei City:1.There is a significant and positive correlation between personality traits and team leadership competencies.2.Personality traits (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness to Experience) do promote team leadership competencies, especially Openness to Experience. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 5 第三節 重要名詞釋義 6 第四節 研究方法與步驟 9 第五節 研究範圍與限制 11第二章 文獻探討 13 第一節 臺北市公立幼稚園現況之探討 13 第二節 人格特質的理論與研究 24 第三節 團隊領導能力的理論與研究 39第三章 研究設計與實施 79 第一節 研究架構 79 第二節 研究對象 83 第三節 研究工具 86 第四節 實施程序 113 第五節 資料分析 115第四章 研究結果與討論 117 第一節 臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質與團隊領導能力之現況 117 第二節 不同背景變項在臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質與團隊領導能 力之差異情形 127 第三節 臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質與團隊領導能力之相關分析 142 第四節 臺北市公立幼稚園園長人格特質對團隊領導能力的預測分析 145 第五節 綜合討論 157第五章 結論與建議 171 第一節 結論 171 第二節 建議 177參考文獻 181附 錄 191 附錄一 開放式訪談問卷 191 附錄二 訪談內容紀錄之逐字稿整理 193 附錄三 預試調查問卷 208 附錄四 正式調查問卷 212 附錄五 正式問卷調查樣本基本資料分析表 216 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 114692 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 163190 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 197814 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 152452 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 386226 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 987912 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 729730 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 744179 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 215653 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 303332 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 685088 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095157004 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 人格特質 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 團隊領導能力 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公立幼稚園園長 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Personality traits | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Team Leadership Competencies | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Director of public kindergarten | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Five-Factor Model | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 臺北市公立幼稚園園長團隊領導能力之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | A study on the team leadership competencies of directors for public kindergarten in Taipei city | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 壹、中文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 文林(譯) (1993)。Maddux著。團隊建立。臺北市:麥田。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王秉鈞(譯) (1995)。S. P. Robbins著。管理學。臺北市:華泰。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王素蓮(譯) (2006)。R. Luecke著。如何吞下一頭大象?高績效團隊創新突圍的秘訣。臺北市:天下。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 江錦樺(2001)。人格特質與組織文化之適配性對工作績效之影響-以高科技F公司為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳百祿(2006)。知識經濟時代的領導理論。學校行政雙月刊,43,20-33。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳佩芳(2003)。管理才能、工作動機、部門績效關係之研究。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳秉恩(1986)。組織行為學。臺北市:華泰。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳煥烘(2004)。學校行政領導理論與實務。臺北市:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳肇賢(2005)。國民小學級任教師人格特質、領導技巧 與班級經營效能之研究-以屏東地區國小高年級學童為例。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李文正、張幼珠(譯) (1999)。J. Rodd著。成功的托教行政管理:園所領導之鑰。臺北市:光佑。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李美枝(1985)。社會變遷中中國女角色及性格的改變。論文發表於臺大人口研究中心舉辦之「婦女在國家發展過程中的角色」國際學術研討會,臺北市。。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李淑惠(2005)。近二十年國內外幼兒園園長相關領域研究之發展與趨勢分析—兼從性別與幼教任務觀點討論未來研究之方向。教育經營與管理研究集刊,1,99-130。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李碧雯(2008)。幼稚園教師人格特質、組織文化知覺與課程變革關注之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李弘暉(1997)。高績效團隊管理的理論基礎-團隊理論模型綜述。中國行政評論,6(4),87-104。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李弘暉、鍾麗英(民88)。團隊運作過程對團隊績效之影響之研究。人力資源學報,11,1-18。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 周惠莉(2003)。五大人格特質、性別角色與轉換型領導關聯性之研究。中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 周惠莉(2003)。五大人格特質、性別角色與轉換型領導關聯性之研究。中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林佳穎(2007)。觀光產業組織文化、管理者人格特質與領導型態關係之研究。靜宜大學觀光事業學系碩士論文,未出版,臺中縣。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林建欣(1998)。提升組織承諾之研究:團隊建立的觀點。臺北市:國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林能白、丘宏昌(1999)。服務品質之研究-服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應用。管理學報,16(2),11-15。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林財丁(2004)。管理與商業心理學。臺中市:滄海。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林財丁、林瑞發(編譯) (2006)。S. P Robbins著。組織行為。臺中市:臺灣培生。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林淑娟(2005)。人際效能與衝擊影響力對團隊領導效能影響之研究。朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,未出版,臺中縣。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林鎂絜(2007)。創意人格特質與創新經營關係之研究-以幼稚園園長為例。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱明瑩(2004)。基層主管團隊領導能力之研究-以西式速食連鎖產業為例」。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 思穎(譯)(1996)。C. E. Larson. & F. LaFasto著。追求卓越的團隊趨勢。臺北市:業強。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪文良、謝金青(2002)。理想抽樣有效人數對照表。2008年4月10日,取自http://www.nhcue.edu.tw/~king0120/。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪耕燦(1995)。幼稚園園長經營理念之探討。文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪福財(2000)。幼兒教育史-臺灣觀點。臺北市:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 范楊松(1995)。團結真有力:工作團隊的建立、發展與領導。臺北市:金臺灣。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫本初、呂育誠(1996),從分析單元論團隊的意義及其對公共管理之影響,政治大學學報,73,145-177。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫立葳(2001)。幼稚園品質的把關者需要什麼。國教世紀,196,47-50。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 袁世珮(譯) (2003)。H. Lawrence. 著。團隊管理立即上手。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 高士傑(1996)。幼稚園園長領導型式、教師準備度與組織效能關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張同廟、劉維群(2007)。五大人格特質與領導能力之關係探討--以臺南地區大學校院學生社團幹部為例。高雄餐旅學報,9(1),35-61。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張明麗(2000)。幼兒教師人格特質與生命態度之研究。幼兒教育年刊,12,159-188。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張東峰、鄭伯勳(譯)(1981)。Hilgard著。心理學。臺北市:桂冠。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張春興(1987)。心理學(修訂第二十版)。臺北市:東華。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張翊翔(2004)。團隊成員人格特質組合對團隊效能影響之研究-以團隊互動過程為中介變項。中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張衛族(2002)。幼稚園園長專業角色與任用制度研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部統計處(2008)。全國幼稚園概況表。2008年12月06日,取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/index.aspx.。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊琇文(2007)。幼兒教師的人格特質、工作價值觀及其與工作表現之相關研究。樹德科技大學幼兒保育系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許玉齡(2001)。幼教品質繫於幼兒園園長。國教世紀,196,41-46。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許玉齡(2004)。公立幼稚園園長的工作職責與角色之調查研究。國教學報,16,249-278。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許玉齡(2005)。桃園縣幼稚園園長專業能力發展指引。桃園縣:桃園縣政府。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許逸柔(2005)。幼稚園園長專業能力及其培育制度之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許嘉玲(2003)。研發團隊領導者核心職能對團隊創新校能及成員創新行為之影響。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭進隆(譯) (1994)。P. M. Senge著。第五項修練:學習型組織與實務。臺北市:天下。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳世桓(1997)。臺北市普設公立幼稚園政策執行之評估研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳玉娟(2000)。團隊管理及其在國民中小學運用之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳惠民等(1998)。高效率團隊:實務操演手冊。臺北縣:科技圖書。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 章世佳(譯) (2008) J. Maxwell著。領導的黃金法則。臺北市:天下。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曾介宏(1997)。團隊式組織之研究-設計與文化創造的觀點。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 游恆山(編譯)(1990) P. G. Zimbardo著。心理學。臺北市:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃哲峰(2007)。領導型態、人格特質與全球管理技能之關係探討。國立臺北科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃堅厚(1999)。人格心理學。臺北市:心理。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃淑芳(2006)。桃園縣國民小學男女校長領導風格之比較研究。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊國信(2005)。國民小學團隊管理策略之運用與行政效能關係之研究-以高高屏三縣市為例。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(1989)。社會及行為科學研究法(13th)。臺北市:東華。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 萬淑娟(2001)。幼稚園園長運用溝通媒介之個案研究。國立新竹師範學院幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉明華(2001)。國民小學運用團隊型組織與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葛中俊(譯)(1996)。J. Spiegel & C. Torres著。團隊工作的原理。臺北市:業強。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賈春琦(1999)。團隊型組織在國民中學學校行政應用之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖鳳瑞、保心怡(2002)。幼兒園專業成 長整合型計劃-幼兒園領導者專業成長知研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC89-2413-H-003-108-F22)。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 漢菊德(1996)。如何扮好園長的角色。新幼教,12,22-25。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 臺北市教育局(2000)。臺北市幼稚園園務行政手冊。臺北市:作者。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 臺北市教育局(2008)。臺北市九十七學年度公立幼稚園通訊名冊。2008年12月06日,取自http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw/. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉麗華(2000)。主管管理才能評鑑360度回饋對受評者態度的影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡明穎(2000)。「團隊領導者核心才能評鑑量表」之建立-以在臺日式企業為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡春美、張翠娥、敖韻玲(1992)。幼稚園與托兒所行政。臺北市:心理。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡進雄(2005)。學校領導理論研究。臺北市:師大書苑。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭瓊芳(1999)。團隊建立法應用於非營利組織運作之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝秋如(2008)。臺北縣國民小學主任團隊領導與團隊效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅虞村(1999)。領導理論研究。臺北市:文景。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 譚家瑜(譯) (1995)。J. H. Zenger著。卓越領導:組織專業團隊,引爆企業變革。臺北市:遠流。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蘇伯顯(1978)。領導與組織。臺北市:國家。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蘇建洲(2003)。提升國小協同教學成效策略之研究:以團隊管理觀點。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 貳、西文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Adair, J. (1987). Effective team building. UK: Gower Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ainger, A., Kaura, R. & Ennals, R. (1995). Executive guide to business success though human-centered systems. New York: Springer | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allport,G.W.(1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bassett, G. (1995). The new training: Operations methods for high performance. Human Resource Planning, 19, 38-47. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bloom, P. J. (2000). Image from the field: How directors view their organizations, their roles, and their jobs. In M. L. Culkin(Ed.), Managing quality in young children’s programs: the leader’s role. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Buchholz, S. , Roth, T. & Hess, K. (1987). Creating the high-performance team. New York: John Wiley & Sons. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic trait into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476~506 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Charles, J. M. (2002). Team leadership. UK: Thomson. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Culkin, M. L. (1997). Administrative leadership. Kagan & Bowman (1997) (Eds). Leadership in early care and education. Washington, DC:NAEYC. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chisholm, M. E. (1976). Medial personnel in education: A competency approach. N.J.: Prentice-Hall | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cable, D. N. & Judge T. A.(2003). Managers’ upward influence tactic strategies:the role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style. Journal of Organizational Behavior,24(2),197-214. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R.(1992). Revised NEO personality inventory(NEO-PI-R)and NEO Five-Factor(NEO-FFI)inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL:PAR. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crosby, Barbara C. (1996). Leading in a Shared-Power world, In J. L. Perry(Ed.). Handbook of Public Administration. (613-631). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dew, J (1995). Creating team leaders. Journal for Quality and Participation, 18(6), 50-54. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dwight S., Cummings K., Glenar J.(1998). Comparison of Criterion-Related validity coefficients for the Mini-Markers and Goldberg`s Markers of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(3), 541-551. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Edward, F. M. (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(3), 221-235. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ends, E., & Page, C. (1977). Organization Team Building. Winthrop: Cambridge, Massachusetts. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Feldman, D. C. & Arnold, H. J. (1983).Managing Individual and Group Behavior in Organization. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fiedler, F. E. (1967).A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fisher, K. (1995).Tips for teams: A ready reference for solving common team problems. New York: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fletcher, S. (1992). NVOS, standards and competence: A practice guide for employers, Management and Trainers. London: Kogan page | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | French, W. & Bell C. Jr. (1995). Organizational development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement(5th). Prentice-Hall, Inc. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Friedman, M. & Rosenman R. H.,(1974).Type A and your heart. New York: Knoph. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gross, S. E. (1995). Compensation for teams. New York: American Management Association. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guzzo, R. , Salas, E, & Associates(1995).Team effective and decision making in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hager, P., & Gonczi, A. (1980). What is competence. Medical Teacher, 18(1), 15-18. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1988).Management of organizational behavior : utilizing human resources. N. J. : Prentice-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training & Development Journal, 44(11), 79-83 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Judge,T. A.& Bono,J. E.(2000). Five-Factor Model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology,85(5),p751-765. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jessup, H. R. (1992). The road to results for teams.Training & Development Journal, 46(9). 65-68. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jones, J. J. , Salisbury, C. J., & Spencer, R. L. (1969).Secondary school administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kassarjian, H. H. (1971). Personality and consumer behavior: a review. Journal of Marketing Research. 8(4), 409. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1993), The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. New York: Happer Collins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kelly K. E. (2006). Relationship between the Five-Factor Model of personality and the scale of creative Attributes and behavior: A validational study. Individual Differences Research, 4(5), 299-305. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kelly W. E. & Johnson J. L.(2005). Time use efficiency and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Education, 125(3), 511-515. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kleinmuntz, B. (1967). Personality measurement: An introduction. Homewood:Dorsey. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1995). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. Paper presented at the Third University of North Texas Symposium on Work Teams, Dallas, TX | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Larson, C. E. & F. Lafasto(1989). Teamwork: what must go right/what can go wrong, Newbury Park, Cal: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lim, B. C. & Ployhart, R. E.(2004). Transformational leadership: relations to the Five-Factor Model and team performance in typical and maximum context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 610-621. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ledford, G. E. (1995). Paying for the skill, knowledge, and competencies of knowledge workers. Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(4), 55-62. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lewis, J. P. (1993). How to build and manage A winning project team. NY: American Management Association. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P. (1993). Business without bosses:Hhow self-managing teams are building high-performing companies. New York: John Wiley & Sons. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1998). Team leadership in practice. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 28(2), 26-29. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCrae, R.R.& John, O. P. (1990). An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality, 60 (2), 175-215. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McGregor, D. M. (1960).The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mohrman, S. A. , Cohen, S. G. , & Mohrman, A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Montebello, A. R. & Buzzotta, V. R. (1993).Work team that work. Training & Development, 47(3), 59-64. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morgan.G. (2000). The director as a key to quality. In M.L.Culkin(Ed.)Managing quality in young children’s programs : The leader’s role (p.40-59). Teachers College, New York.: Columbia University press | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Palmer J. K. & Loveland J. M.(2004). Further Investigation of the psychometric properties of Saucier’s Big Five “Mini-Markers”: Evidence for criterion and construct validity. Individual Differences Research, 2(3), 231-238. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parker, G. M. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parker, G. M. (1994). Cross-functional team: working with allies, enemies, and other strangers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parry, S. B. (1998). Just what is a competency and why should you care. Training, 7, 58-64. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Posey, P., & Klein, J. (1990). Revitalizing manufacturing: Text and cases. Irwin: Homewood. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rodd, J. (2006).Leadership in early childhood (3rd ).New York: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rotter, J. B.,(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monograph, 12, 48-80. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A. & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey & Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance(p.3-29). NJ: Ablex... | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg unipolar Big-Five Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506-516. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schiller, J. (1987). Peer supervision: Learning more about what we do. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 12(3), 43-46. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shonk, J. H. (1982). Working in teams: A practical manual for improving work groups. New York: Amacom. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work. John Wiley & Sons. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Steckler, N. & Fondas, N. (1995). Building team leader effectiveness: A diagnostic tool. Organizational Dynamics, 23(3), 20-35. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Theresa, K. (1999). Remaking teams: the revolutionary research-based guide that puts theory into practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thomas, J. B., & Kenneth, P. D. (1996). Diagnosing whether an organization is truly ready to empower work teams: A case study. Human Resource Planning, 19, 38-47. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Trent, R. J. (1996). Understanding and evaluating cross-functional sourcing team leadership. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32, 29-36. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Dixon, G. R. (1994). Inside teams: How 20 world-class organizational are winning through teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wesbord, M. (1987). Toward Third-Wave managing and consulting. Organizational Dynamics 15, 19-20. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wilson, J. M., & Wellins, R. S. (1995). Leading teams. Executive Excellence, 12 (6), 78. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Woodruffe, C. (1991). Competence by any other name. Personnel Management, 23(9), 30-33. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yeung, A. K. (1996). Competencies for HR professionals: An interview with Richard E. Boyatzis. Human Resource Management, 35(1), 119-131. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations(2nd). New York: Prentice Hall. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yukl, G. A.(2002). Leadership in Organizations(5th). NJ: Prentice Hall. | zh_TW |