| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊世雄<br>曾慶豹 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yang, Shih-HSiung<br>Chin, Ken Pa | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 郭大維 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Kuo, Da-Wei | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 郭大維 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Kuo, Da-Wei | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 12:48:32 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 12:48:32 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 12:48:32 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0921540131 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37244 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92154013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 斯賓諾莎的《神學政治論》向來被認為是現代自由民主、與聖經批判的哲學性起源，學者大多認為斯賓諾莎以一種科學式的方法來研究聖經。本文旨在研究斯賓諾莎的聖經觀與宗教觀。藉著對十七世紀荷蘭神學－政治背景、以及《神學政治論》第七章到第十五章的分析，來說明斯賓諾莎所關心的並不是「如何解釋聖經」，而是「誰有權釋經」。他並不是藉著一種客觀的方法論來研究聖經，而是將解釋聖經的判准建立在解釋者的德性之上。而後不斷質疑各種可能形成解釋權威、壟斷信仰的科學式或理論性宗教知識。他把信仰的本質還原為生活，並且主張唯有解釋者有道德行為，他對聖經的解釋才可能是真的。因此，斯賓諾莎解釋聖經的方式不是一種聖經批判，而是一種德性證成的觀點。藉此，他把解釋聖經的權利還諸一切信仰者，並且將哲學與神學分離，前者的基礎是思辨理論，後者的基礎是道德實踐。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Spinoza`s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus has always been regarded as the philosophical origin of modern liberal democracy and modern biblical criticism. Most scholars consider Spinoza’s biblical study as a kind of scientific method. This thesis aims at Spinoza’s view of the Bible and his view of religion. By a description of the theological-political background of the 17th century Dutch, and an analysis of Tractatus Theologico-Politicus Chapters 7 through 15, I would demonstrate that Spinoza cares not “how to study the Scripture” but “who has the authority to interpret the Scripture.” He does not study the Scripture by means of an objective methodology, rather, he sets up the criteria of biblical interpretation upon the virtue of interpreters. Then he doubts constantly every kind of theoretical knowledge of religion which may become the authority of interpretation and monopolize the faith. He reduces the essence of faith to life, and claims that only when an interpreter is moral, can his interpretation of the Scripture be true. Therefore, Spinoza’s interpretation of the Bible is not a kind of biblical-criticism, but a kind of justification by means of virtue. By doing so (or simply “Thus”), he returns the right of interpreting Scripture back to all believers, and separates philosophy away from theology. The foundation of philosophy is speculative theory, and theology is based on moral practices. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄導論 1第一節 問題意識 1第二節 研究概況 2第二節 研究範圍與方法 7第一章 斯賓諾莎的生平與著作 10第一節 早年生活 10第二節 逐出社群 11第三節 驅逐之後 15第四節 從倫理學到政治學 17第五節 斯賓諾莎在海牙 21第六節 晚年 25第二章 《神學政治論》的形成 30導言 30第一節 荷蘭的釋經爭論與之前的聖經批判 32第二節 《書信》中的寫作目的 38第三節 《神學政治論》的書序 44第四節 結論 65第三章 斯賓諾莎論宗教 67第一節 斯賓諾莎的聖經 67第二節 聖經的普遍教導 77第三節 普遍宗教的教義 83第四章 《神學政治論》論釋經學方法 89導言 89第一節 《神學政治論》第七章的釋經學方法 90第二節 方法論應用的困難與斯賓諾莎的回應 97第三節 小結 102第五章 反駁其他釋經觀點 104導言 104第一節 批判超自然光照的釋經原則 106第二節 哲學作為聖經的解釋者 108第三節 批判訴諸傳統的權威 113第四節 反對非理性主義的釋經 115第五節 反對數學式的釋經原則 119第六節 小結 123第六章 結論 125參考書目 126 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 95920 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 144859 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 113264 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 108315 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 245777 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 405005 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 473178 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 359216 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 300751 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 410023 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 126952 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 89518 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0921540131 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 神學－政治問題 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 解釋者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 聖經研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 方法論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 德性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | theologico-political problem | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | interpreter | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | bible study | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | methodology | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | virtue | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 斯賓諾莎論釋經：《神學政治論》研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Spinoza on biblical interpretation: a study of tractatus theologico-politicus | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aubrey, John. Brief Lives. Edited by Andrew Clark. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898s. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bentley, Jerry. Humanist and Holy Writ: New Testament in the Renaissance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Curely, Edwin. "Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece (I): Spinoza and the Science of Hermeneutics." In Spinoza: The Enduring Questions, edited by Graeme Hunter. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Descartes, René, G. R. T. Ross, and Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane. The Philosophical Works of Descartes. London: Cambridge U.P., 1967. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Freudenthal, J. Die Lebensgeschichte Spinoza`s in Quellenschriften, Urkunden Und Nichtamtlichen Nachrichten. Leipzig: Verlag Von Veit, 1899. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Ma. 2nd, Revised ed. New York: Continuum, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Garrett, Don. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goudriaan, Aza. Reformed Orthodoxy and Philosophy, 1625-1750 : Gisbertus Voetius, Petrus Van Mastricht, and Anthonius Driessen. Leiden: Brill, 2006. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harrisville, Roy A., and Walter Sundberg. The Bible in Modern Culture: Baruch Spinoza to Brevard Childs. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans Pub., 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan with Selected Vaeiants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Edited by Edwin Curley. Cambridge: Hackett, 1994. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hunter, Graeme. Radical Protestantism in Spinoza`s Thought. Aldershot, England ; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Israel, Jonathan. "Introduction." In Theological-Political Treatise, edited by Jonathan Israel, viii-xxxi. New York: Cambridge, 2007. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Israel, Jonathan Irvine. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650-1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lang, Berel. "The Politics of Interpretation: Spinoza`s Modernist Turn." Review of Metaphysics 43 (1989): 338-48. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maimonides, Moses. The Guide for the Perplexed. Translated by M. Friedländer. skokie, illinois: Varda Books, 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Meijer, L., S. Shirley, and L. Rice. Philosophy as the Interpreter of Holy Scripture (1666): Marquette University Press, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mendes, David Franco. "Memorias Do Estabelecimento E Progresso Dos Judeos Portuguezes E Espanhoes Nesta Famosa Citade De Amsterdam." Studia Rosenthaliana 9 (1975). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nadler, Steven. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Popkin, R. H. "Spinoza and Bible Scholarship." In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, edited by Don Garrett, 383-407. Cambridge: Cambridge, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. "Spinoza and La Peyrère." In Spinoza New Perspective, edited by R. W. Shahan and J. I. Biro, 177-95. Norman: University of Oklahoma, 1978. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. "Spinoza and Samuel Fisher." Philosophia(Ramat Gan) 15, no. 3 (1985): 219-36. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Popkin, Richard H., and Richard Henry Popkin. The History of Scepticism : From Savonarola to Bayle. Rev. and expanded ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Preus, James S. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part I: Religion on the Margins: Conversos and Collegiants." Religion 28, no. 1 (1998): 3-14. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part Ii: The Rise and Fall of the Bible." Religion 28, no. 1 (1998): 15-27. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part Iii: The Hidden Dialogue in Spinoza`s Tractatus." Religion 28, no. 2 (1998): 111-24. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part Iv: Prophecy, Knowledge, and the Study of Religion." Religion 28, no. 2 (1998): 125-38. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. "A Hidden Opponent in Spinoza`s Tractatus." The Harvard Theological Review 88, no. 3 (1995): 361-88. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Revah, I. S. Spinoza Et Juan De Prado. Paris: Mouton & Co., 1959. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rummel, Erika, ed. Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus. Vol. 9, A Series of Handbooks and Reference Works on the Intellectual and Religious Life of Europe, 500-1700. Leiden: Brill, 2008. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spinoza, Benedictus de. Complete Works. Translated by Samuel Shirley and Michael L. Morgan. Edited by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spinoza, Benedictus de, and Carl Gebhardt. Opera. Gebhardt, Carl ed. Vol. 5 vols. Heidelberg: C. Winters, 1972. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spinoza, Benedictus de, and Jonathan Israel. Theological-Political Treatise, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spinoza, Benedictus de, and Samuel Shirley. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus : (Gebhardt Edition, 1925). Leiden: Brill, 1989. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spinoza, Benedictus de, Samuel Shirley, and Michael L. Morgan. Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub., 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strauss, Leo. Persecution and the Art of Writing. University of Chicago Press ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Spinoza`s Critique of Religion. New York: Schocken, 1965. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stuermann, Walter E. . "Benedict Spinoza: A Pioneer in Biblical Criticism." Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 29 (1960-1961): 133-79. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wielema, Michiel. "Adriaan Koerbagh: Biblical Criticism and Enlightenment." In The Early Enlightenent in the Dutch Republic, 1650-1750, edited by Wiep van Bunge, 61-80. Leiden: Brill, 2003. | zh_TW |
