學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 民眾公平觀感與民眾滿意度之關連:以台灣全民健保政策為例
Perceptions of equality and citizen satisfaction: a study of NHI in Taiwan
作者 黃汎如
貢獻者 陳敦源<br>陳麗光
黃汎如
關鍵詞 民眾滿意度
新公共管理
程序正義
實質正義
citizen satisfaction
New Public Management
procedural justice
substantive justice
日期 2008
上傳時間 19-Sep-2009 13:08:09 (UTC+8)
摘要 有鑑於八0年代新公共管理(NPM)的興起對公共行政帶來重大的影響,其顧客導向的主張,刺激了顧客滿意度調查在公部門廣泛的應用。然而回顧過去公私部門重要的民眾滿意度調查,發現評估指標幾乎都著重在效率、效能面,而公共行政引以為本的公平價值卻少見探討。因此,本研究選取對人民影響最基本但重大的全民健保政策為個案,嘗試建構一個兼顧效率與公平面的民眾滿意度模型,並將焦點置於公民公平觀感與滿意度之間關連性的探討。在資料的蒐集上,採用國家衛生研究院「衛生醫療體系優先順序之制定的研究」於2007年12月1日至12月24日進行的電話訪問調查,經扣除遺漏值後,共有2478份樣本。本研究所建構的民眾滿意度ordered probit模型以「健保滿意度」為結果變項,解釋變項則包含了基本人口社經背景、以及效率效能面和公平面的指標。經實證結果發現,過去一直被強調的效率效能指標對健保滿意度確實產生顯著影響,但民眾對健保政策的主觀公平觀感也被證實與滿意度有顯著關連;換句話說,如果政府進行民眾滿意度調查時,未能含括公平面指標,則其所獲得的資訊將不能完整表達民眾的心聲。但本研究亦發現公民對健保政策以外的公平性態度並未顯著的影響健保滿意度,因此,民眾滿意度調查中測量公平觀感必需具有明確的政策背景。
In the past three decades, new public management (NPM) has a great impact on the field of public administration. Among the impacts, “customer orientation” is the most influential one. For the purpose of evaluating citizen satisfaction on government services, public agencies begin to utilize the Customer Satisfaction Survey (CSS) mainly designed and administrated by business managers. However, after reviewing the content of the CSS questionnaires, we find that the emphasizing values behind the CSS are efficiency and effectiveness rather than equality, which is sometimes the main value behind public service delivery. Whether value of equality will influence citizen’s level of satisfaction is the main research question of this thesis. We take Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) as a case study, and utilize a citizen survey on priority setting of the NHI from the National Health Research Institutes in late 2007 as the secondary data. The dependent variable of our citizen satisfaction ordered probit model is “NHI satisfaction”, and explanatory variables including demographic backgrounds, indexes about efficiency or effectiveness, and indexes about equality. The results show that efficiency and effectiveness have significant association with NHI satisfaction. Most importantly, the citizens’ general evaluation on the equality of NHI also has a significant impact on the NHI satisfaction. According to the results, we suggest that applying CSS into public service evaluation should include index about equality in order to capture the holistic picture of citizen satisfaction.
參考文獻 行政院衛生署中央健保局(2007),《全民健保與您牽手12年:成長與蛻變》。
江逸之(2008),〈2008年幸福城市大調查:永續管理比盲目建設重要〉,《天下雜誌》,第406期,頁102-109。
李美華等譯(1998),Babbie, E.著,《社會科學研究方法》,台北:時英。
余致力(2000),〈論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色:黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示〉,《公共行政學報》,第4期,頁1-29。
吳肖琪(1991),《健康保險與醫療網區域資源對醫療利用之影響》,國立臺灣大學公共衛生學硏究所博士論文,未出版。
吳瓊恩(2002),〈公共行政學發展趨勢的探究:三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論的基礎〉,《公共行政學報》,第7期,頁173-220。
林進財、陳啟斌、吳文祥、陳稚均(2006),〈台灣地區實施全民健康保險後醫療資源公平性之研究〉,《環境與管理研究》,第7卷第2期,頁53-66。
林震岩(2007),《多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用》,台北:智勝文化。
林上祚、江慧真,〈克魯曼:台灣健保 全球最好〉,《中國時報》,2009/5/16,A1版。
林美姿、黃漢華(2009),〈竹市三連貫,高縣桃縣中市苗縣登五星〉,《遠見雜誌》,第276期,頁108-114。
徐永明(2001),〈政治版圖:兩個選舉行為研究途徑的對話〉,《問題與研究》,第40卷第2期,頁95-115。
許立一(2002),〈新公共管理的省思:以黑堡觀點為基礎〉,《公共行政學報》,第6期,頁29-65。
陳世敏(1991),〈民意調查與台灣的民主化:以施政滿意程度與公眾人物的聲望調查為例〉,《新聞學研究》,第45期,頁101-118。
陳敦源(1999),〈顧客導向的省思與再突破:尋找服務的誘因結構〉,《空大行政學報》,第9期,頁209-235。
陳敦源、陳麗光、黃東益、呂佳螢(2008),〈公共行政研究中之正義制度的設計與執行:以全民健保資源配置機制為例〉,發表於全國公共行政系所聯合會年會(TASPAA),台中市:東海大學公共行政暨政策學系主辦。
陳美霞,〈健保美夢還很遙遠〉,《中國時報》,2009/5/22,A26版。
楊志良(1999),〈全民健保財務負擔的幾點迷思與困境〉,《中華公共衛生雜誌》,第18卷第2期,頁85-86。
雷文玫(2004),〈強化我國健保行政決策公民參與的制度設計—二代健保先驅性全民健保公民會議的建議方案〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第1卷第4期,頁57-81。
劉宜君(2001),〈我國全民健康保險政策財務之實證研究〉,《中國行政評論》,第10卷第4期,頁129-176。
鄭文輝(2001),〈Social Health Insurance in Taiwan: Current Status and Perspectives〉,《保險專刊》,第64期,頁1-45。
Boyne, G. A. (2002) “Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?” Journal of Management Studies, 39(1): 97-122.
Bozeman, B. (1987) All Organizations are Public, London: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, K., & Coulter, P. B. (1983) “Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery,” Public Administration Review, 43(1): 50-58.
Brown, T. (2007) “Coercion versus Choice: Citizen Evaluations of Public Service Quality across Methods of Consumption,” Public Administration Review, 67(3): 559-572.
Chen, D. Y., Huang, T. Y., Hsiao, N. Y. (2006) “Reinventing Government through On-Line Citizen Involvement in The Developing World: A Case Study Of Taipei City Mayor’s E-Mail Box In Taiwan,” Public Administration And Development, 26: 409-423.
Cumberford, J.; Gordon, G.; & Sinha, N. N. (1999) “The Creation of a National Citizen Satisfaction Index,” Quality Congress. ASQ`s 53rd Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, 53: 595-600.
Dolinsky, A. L., & Caputo, R. K. (1990) “The Role of Health Care Attributes and Demographic Characteristics in the Determination of Health Care Satisfaction,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, 10(4): 31-39.
Daniels, N. (1981) “Health-care Needs and Distributive Justice,” Philosophy and Public affairs, 10(2): 146-179.
Daniels, N. (2001) “Justice, Health, and Healthcare,” American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2): 2-16.
Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. (1998) “The Ethics of Accountability in Managed Care Reform,” Health Affairs, 17: 50-63.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000) “The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering,” Public Administration Review, 60(6): 549-559.
Etter, J. F., & Perneger, T.V. (1997) “Validating A Satisfaction Questionnaire Using Multiple Approaches: a Case Study,” Social Science & Medicine, 45(6): 879-885.
Frederickson, H. G. (1997) The Spirit of Public Administration, San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Green, R. T., & Hubbell, L. (1996) “On Governance and Reinventing Government,” in Wamsley, G. L., & Wolf, J. F. (eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges, pp.38-67. CA: Sage.
Hart, D. K. (1974) “Social Equity, Justice, and the Equitable Administrator,” Public Administration Review, 34(1): 3-11
Haviland, M. G., Morales, L. S., Dial, T. H., & Pincus, H.A. (2005) “Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction With Health Care,” American Journal Of Medical Quality, 20(4): 195-203.
Kelly, J. M. (2005) “The Dilemma of the Unsatisfied Customer in a Market Model of Public Administration,” Public Administration Review, 65(1): 76-84.
Kurland, N. B., & Egan, T. D. (1999) “Public v. Private Perceptions of Formalization, Outcomes, and Justice,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(3): 437-458.
Musa, R., Pallister, J., & Robson, M. (2005) “The Roles of Perceived Value, Perceived Equity and Relational Commitment in a Disconfirmation Paradigm Framework: An Initial Assessment in a `Relationship-Rich` Consumption Environment,” Advances in Consumer Research, 32: 349-357.
Nagel, S. S. (1984) Public Policy: Goals, Means, and Methods, New York : St. Martin`s Press.
Okun, A. M. (1975) Equality and Efficiency: the Big Tradeoff, Washington : The Brookings Institution.
Oliver, R. L. (1980) “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17: 460-469.
Oliver, R. L. (1997) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, New York : McGraw Hill.
Olsen, J. A. (1997) “Theories of justice and their implications for priority setting in health care,” Journal of Health Economics, 16(6): 625-639.
Osborne, D., Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government, NY : Plume.
Poister, T. H., & Henry, G. T. (1994) “Citizen Ratings of Public and Private Service Quality: A Comparative Perspective,” Public Administration Review, 54(2): 155-160.
Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univeristy Press.
Röhl, K. F. (1997) “Procedural Justice: Introduction and Overview,” in Röhl, K. F., & Machura, S., Procedural Justice, pp1-35, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Ross, C. K., Steward, C. A., & Sinacore, J. M. (1993) “The Importance of Patient Preferences in the Measurement of Health Care Satisfaction,” Medical Care, 31(12): 1138-1149.
Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008) “What is Qualty of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions,” Governance, 21(2): 165-190.
Ryzin, V., & Gregg, G. (2004) “Expectations, Performance, and Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3): 433-448.
Saha, S., Arbelaez, J. J., & Cooper, L. A.(2003) “Patient-Physician Relationships and Racial Disparities in the Quality of Health Care,” American Journal of Public Health, 93(10): 1713-1719.
Stone, A. D.(1997) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.
Tsuchiya, A., Miguel, L. S., Edlin, R., Wailoo, A., & Dolan, P. (2005) “Procedural Justice in Public Healthcare Resource Allocation,” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 4(2): 119-127.
Vermunt, R. & Törnblom, K. Y. (2007) Distributive and Procedural Justice : Research and Social Applications, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Vigoda, E., & Yuval, F. (2004) “A National Assessment Project of Public Administration: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Findings from Israel,” Public Administration Quarterly, 28(4): 501-537.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006) “Citizens’ Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration: A Five-Year National Study of Their Relationship to Satisfaction with Services, Trust in Governance, and Voice Orientations,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17: 285-305.
Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Justice., New York: Basic Books.
Ware, J. E., Snyder, M. K., Wright, W. R., & Davis, A. R. (1983) “Defining and Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care,” Evaluation and Program Planning, 6(3-4): 247-263.
White, B. (1999) “Measuring Patient Satisfaction: How to Do It and Why to Bother,” Family Practice Management, 6(1): 40-44.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989) Bureaucracy : What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, New York: Basic Books.
WHO (2000) The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems : Improving Performance, World Health Organization.
WHO (2002) The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life, World Health Organization.
WHO (2003) The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future, World Health Organization.
WHO (2005) The World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count, World Health Organization.
WHO (2006) The World Health Report 2006: Working Together for Health, World Health Organization.
WHO (2008) The World Health Report 2008 : Primary Health Care Now More Than Ever, World Health Organization.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
95256016
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095256016
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳敦源<br>陳麗光zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃汎如zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 黃汎如zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-Sep-2009 13:08:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Sep-2009 13:08:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Sep-2009 13:08:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0095256016en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37311-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95256016zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 有鑑於八0年代新公共管理(NPM)的興起對公共行政帶來重大的影響,其顧客導向的主張,刺激了顧客滿意度調查在公部門廣泛的應用。然而回顧過去公私部門重要的民眾滿意度調查,發現評估指標幾乎都著重在效率、效能面,而公共行政引以為本的公平價值卻少見探討。因此,本研究選取對人民影響最基本但重大的全民健保政策為個案,嘗試建構一個兼顧效率與公平面的民眾滿意度模型,並將焦點置於公民公平觀感與滿意度之間關連性的探討。在資料的蒐集上,採用國家衛生研究院「衛生醫療體系優先順序之制定的研究」於2007年12月1日至12月24日進行的電話訪問調查,經扣除遺漏值後,共有2478份樣本。本研究所建構的民眾滿意度ordered probit模型以「健保滿意度」為結果變項,解釋變項則包含了基本人口社經背景、以及效率效能面和公平面的指標。經實證結果發現,過去一直被強調的效率效能指標對健保滿意度確實產生顯著影響,但民眾對健保政策的主觀公平觀感也被證實與滿意度有顯著關連;換句話說,如果政府進行民眾滿意度調查時,未能含括公平面指標,則其所獲得的資訊將不能完整表達民眾的心聲。但本研究亦發現公民對健保政策以外的公平性態度並未顯著的影響健保滿意度,因此,民眾滿意度調查中測量公平觀感必需具有明確的政策背景。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the past three decades, new public management (NPM) has a great impact on the field of public administration. Among the impacts, “customer orientation” is the most influential one. For the purpose of evaluating citizen satisfaction on government services, public agencies begin to utilize the Customer Satisfaction Survey (CSS) mainly designed and administrated by business managers. However, after reviewing the content of the CSS questionnaires, we find that the emphasizing values behind the CSS are efficiency and effectiveness rather than equality, which is sometimes the main value behind public service delivery. Whether value of equality will influence citizen’s level of satisfaction is the main research question of this thesis. We take Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) as a case study, and utilize a citizen survey on priority setting of the NHI from the National Health Research Institutes in late 2007 as the secondary data. The dependent variable of our citizen satisfaction ordered probit model is “NHI satisfaction”, and explanatory variables including demographic backgrounds, indexes about efficiency or effectiveness, and indexes about equality. The results show that efficiency and effectiveness have significant association with NHI satisfaction. Most importantly, the citizens’ general evaluation on the equality of NHI also has a significant impact on the NHI satisfaction. According to the results, we suggest that applying CSS into public service evaluation should include index about equality in order to capture the holistic picture of citizen satisfaction.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景:新公共管理激起的滿意度調查火花 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 2
第三節 為什麼選擇全民健保政策? 7
第四節 全民健保政策介紹 9
第五節 研究問題 12
第六節 研究流程與章節安排 13
第貳章 文獻回顧 16
第一節 新公共管理的反思:公平對公共行政的重要性 16
第二節 私部門的顧客滿意度文獻 20
第三節 公部門的民眾滿意度文獻 22
第四節 民眾公平觀感對政府表現評估的影響 26
第五節 醫療滿意度相關文獻 28
第六節 程序正義與實質正義 30
第七節 小結 35
第參章 研究設計 37
第一節 研究架構 37
第二節 研究方法:次級資料分析 40
第三節 資料來源 41
第四節 變項定義與操作化 42
第五節 研究假設 55
第肆章 研究結果分析及討論 58
第一節 分析方法 58
第二節 單變量分析 62
第三節 多變量分析 72
第四節 與研究問題對話 87
第伍章 結論與建議 94
第一節 研究結論:傾聽民意—效率之外,還要公平 94
第二節 研究建議 96
第三節 研究限制及未來研究建議 99
參考文獻 101
附錄一:健保大事紀 107
附錄二:「衛生醫療體系優先順序之制定的研究」問卷擷取題目 115
附錄三:單變量描述性統計次數分配表(未合併問項前) 119
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 136554 bytes-
dc.format.extent 153374 bytes-
dc.format.extent 174967 bytes-
dc.format.extent 125584 bytes-
dc.format.extent 373180 bytes-
dc.format.extent 394660 bytes-
dc.format.extent 265252 bytes-
dc.format.extent 372882 bytes-
dc.format.extent 194601 bytes-
dc.format.extent 147838 bytes-
dc.format.extent 208784 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095256016en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民眾滿意度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新公共管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 程序正義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 實質正義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) citizen satisfactionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) New Public Managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) procedural justiceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) substantive justiceen_US
dc.title (題名) 民眾公平觀感與民眾滿意度之關連:以台灣全民健保政策為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Perceptions of equality and citizen satisfaction: a study of NHI in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院衛生署中央健保局(2007),《全民健保與您牽手12年:成長與蛻變》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江逸之(2008),〈2008年幸福城市大調查:永續管理比盲目建設重要〉,《天下雜誌》,第406期,頁102-109。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李美華等譯(1998),Babbie, E.著,《社會科學研究方法》,台北:時英。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 余致力(2000),〈論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色:黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示〉,《公共行政學報》,第4期,頁1-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳肖琪(1991),《健康保險與醫療網區域資源對醫療利用之影響》,國立臺灣大學公共衛生學硏究所博士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳瓊恩(2002),〈公共行政學發展趨勢的探究:三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論的基礎〉,《公共行政學報》,第7期,頁173-220。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林進財、陳啟斌、吳文祥、陳稚均(2006),〈台灣地區實施全民健康保險後醫療資源公平性之研究〉,《環境與管理研究》,第7卷第2期,頁53-66。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林震岩(2007),《多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用》,台北:智勝文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林上祚、江慧真,〈克魯曼:台灣健保 全球最好〉,《中國時報》,2009/5/16,A1版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林美姿、黃漢華(2009),〈竹市三連貫,高縣桃縣中市苗縣登五星〉,《遠見雜誌》,第276期,頁108-114。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐永明(2001),〈政治版圖:兩個選舉行為研究途徑的對話〉,《問題與研究》,第40卷第2期,頁95-115。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許立一(2002),〈新公共管理的省思:以黑堡觀點為基礎〉,《公共行政學報》,第6期,頁29-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳世敏(1991),〈民意調查與台灣的民主化:以施政滿意程度與公眾人物的聲望調查為例〉,《新聞學研究》,第45期,頁101-118。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳敦源(1999),〈顧客導向的省思與再突破:尋找服務的誘因結構〉,《空大行政學報》,第9期,頁209-235。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳敦源、陳麗光、黃東益、呂佳螢(2008),〈公共行政研究中之正義制度的設計與執行:以全民健保資源配置機制為例〉,發表於全國公共行政系所聯合會年會(TASPAA),台中市:東海大學公共行政暨政策學系主辦。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳美霞,〈健保美夢還很遙遠〉,《中國時報》,2009/5/22,A26版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊志良(1999),〈全民健保財務負擔的幾點迷思與困境〉,《中華公共衛生雜誌》,第18卷第2期,頁85-86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 雷文玫(2004),〈強化我國健保行政決策公民參與的制度設計—二代健保先驅性全民健保公民會議的建議方案〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第1卷第4期,頁57-81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉宜君(2001),〈我國全民健康保險政策財務之實證研究〉,《中國行政評論》,第10卷第4期,頁129-176。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭文輝(2001),〈Social Health Insurance in Taiwan: Current Status and Perspectives〉,《保險專刊》,第64期,頁1-45。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boyne, G. A. (2002) “Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?” Journal of Management Studies, 39(1): 97-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bozeman, B. (1987) All Organizations are Public, London: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, K., & Coulter, P. B. (1983) “Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery,” Public Administration Review, 43(1): 50-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, T. (2007) “Coercion versus Choice: Citizen Evaluations of Public Service Quality across Methods of Consumption,” Public Administration Review, 67(3): 559-572.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, D. Y., Huang, T. Y., Hsiao, N. Y. (2006) “Reinventing Government through On-Line Citizen Involvement in The Developing World: A Case Study Of Taipei City Mayor’s E-Mail Box In Taiwan,” Public Administration And Development, 26: 409-423.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cumberford, J.; Gordon, G.; & Sinha, N. N. (1999) “The Creation of a National Citizen Satisfaction Index,” Quality Congress. ASQ`s 53rd Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, 53: 595-600.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dolinsky, A. L., & Caputo, R. K. (1990) “The Role of Health Care Attributes and Demographic Characteristics in the Determination of Health Care Satisfaction,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, 10(4): 31-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daniels, N. (1981) “Health-care Needs and Distributive Justice,” Philosophy and Public affairs, 10(2): 146-179.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daniels, N. (2001) “Justice, Health, and Healthcare,” American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2): 2-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. (1998) “The Ethics of Accountability in Managed Care Reform,” Health Affairs, 17: 50-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000) “The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering,” Public Administration Review, 60(6): 549-559.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Etter, J. F., & Perneger, T.V. (1997) “Validating A Satisfaction Questionnaire Using Multiple Approaches: a Case Study,” Social Science & Medicine, 45(6): 879-885.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Frederickson, H. G. (1997) The Spirit of Public Administration, San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Green, R. T., & Hubbell, L. (1996) “On Governance and Reinventing Government,” in Wamsley, G. L., & Wolf, J. F. (eds.), Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges, pp.38-67. CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hart, D. K. (1974) “Social Equity, Justice, and the Equitable Administrator,” Public Administration Review, 34(1): 3-11zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haviland, M. G., Morales, L. S., Dial, T. H., & Pincus, H.A. (2005) “Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction With Health Care,” American Journal Of Medical Quality, 20(4): 195-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kelly, J. M. (2005) “The Dilemma of the Unsatisfied Customer in a Market Model of Public Administration,” Public Administration Review, 65(1): 76-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kurland, N. B., & Egan, T. D. (1999) “Public v. Private Perceptions of Formalization, Outcomes, and Justice,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(3): 437-458.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Musa, R., Pallister, J., & Robson, M. (2005) “The Roles of Perceived Value, Perceived Equity and Relational Commitment in a Disconfirmation Paradigm Framework: An Initial Assessment in a `Relationship-Rich` Consumption Environment,” Advances in Consumer Research, 32: 349-357.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nagel, S. S. (1984) Public Policy: Goals, Means, and Methods, New York : St. Martin`s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Okun, A. M. (1975) Equality and Efficiency: the Big Tradeoff, Washington : The Brookings Institution.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oliver, R. L. (1980) “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17: 460-469.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oliver, R. L. (1997) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, New York : McGraw Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Olsen, J. A. (1997) “Theories of justice and their implications for priority setting in health care,” Journal of Health Economics, 16(6): 625-639.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Osborne, D., Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government, NY : Plume.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Poister, T. H., & Henry, G. T. (1994) “Citizen Ratings of Public and Private Service Quality: A Comparative Perspective,” Public Administration Review, 54(2): 155-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univeristy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Röhl, K. F. (1997) “Procedural Justice: Introduction and Overview,” in Röhl, K. F., & Machura, S., Procedural Justice, pp1-35, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ross, C. K., Steward, C. A., & Sinacore, J. M. (1993) “The Importance of Patient Preferences in the Measurement of Health Care Satisfaction,” Medical Care, 31(12): 1138-1149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008) “What is Qualty of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions,” Governance, 21(2): 165-190.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ryzin, V., & Gregg, G. (2004) “Expectations, Performance, and Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3): 433-448.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Saha, S., Arbelaez, J. J., & Cooper, L. A.(2003) “Patient-Physician Relationships and Racial Disparities in the Quality of Health Care,” American Journal of Public Health, 93(10): 1713-1719.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stone, A. D.(1997) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsuchiya, A., Miguel, L. S., Edlin, R., Wailoo, A., & Dolan, P. (2005) “Procedural Justice in Public Healthcare Resource Allocation,” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 4(2): 119-127.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vermunt, R. & Törnblom, K. Y. (2007) Distributive and Procedural Justice : Research and Social Applications, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vigoda, E., & Yuval, F. (2004) “A National Assessment Project of Public Administration: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Findings from Israel,” Public Administration Quarterly, 28(4): 501-537.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006) “Citizens’ Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration: A Five-Year National Study of Their Relationship to Satisfaction with Services, Trust in Governance, and Voice Orientations,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17: 285-305.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Justice., New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ware, J. E., Snyder, M. K., Wright, W. R., & Davis, A. R. (1983) “Defining and Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care,” Evaluation and Program Planning, 6(3-4): 247-263.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) White, B. (1999) “Measuring Patient Satisfaction: How to Do It and Why to Bother,” Family Practice Management, 6(1): 40-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson, J. Q. (1989) Bureaucracy : What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) WHO (2000) The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems : Improving Performance, World Health Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) WHO (2002) The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life, World Health Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) WHO (2003) The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future, World Health Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) WHO (2005) The World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count, World Health Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) WHO (2006) The World Health Report 2006: Working Together for Health, World Health Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) WHO (2008) The World Health Report 2008 : Primary Health Care Now More Than Ever, World Health Organization.zh_TW