Publications-Theses

題名 運用社會資本自組都市更新會實施更新之研究
作者 李金桂
貢獻者 賴宗裕
李金桂
關鍵詞 社會資本
都市更新會
都市更新
Social Capital
Urban Renewal Group
Urban Renewal
日期 2008
上傳時間 19-Sep-2009 13:14:18 (UTC+8)
摘要 台灣地區由於經濟快速成長,都市化迅速,使得早期發展之舊市區逐漸呈現衰頹之景象,公共設施嚴重不足,環境品質低落,都市更新遂成為可以用來紓解舊市區土地使用、產業發展與居住環境課題之重要建設工具。臺北市早期發展之老舊住宅及屋齡在30年以上之四、五層樓以下之公寓住宅,因產權複雜所有權人眾多,整合曠日廢時又無利可圖,故開發商不願意介入,較可行的途徑是自組都市更新會辦理更新工作。至98年3月30日止,台北市政府協助自組更新團體共計25案,更新完成個案僅2件,且都為921災後重建案例,顯示都市更新會辦理更新仍有相當的困難度。
本研究嘗試從社會資本的構成內涵-社會網絡、社會信任、社會規範三大面向分析,假設更新單元內社會網絡關係、社會信任關係及社會規範會影響其參與更新意願,透過問卷及深入訪談都市更新會理監事,了解在更新重建前後,更新單元內網絡關係、信任關係及章程規範的設計對重建工作順利與否的影響,以及更新期間更新單元內社會資本的變化。本研究希冀透過對「都市更新會」的調查、研究,試圖建構「都市更新會之推動及規範機制」提供民間自辦都市更新事業整合推動之參考與建議。茲將本研究之結論與建議簡述如下:

一、根據訪談及問卷調查結果,各都市更新會執行更新成效上,可以發現,社會網絡影響所有權人參與更新之意願,社區網絡關係愈活絡,對更新重建工作推動愈順利;更新會發起人的信任關係影響所有權人參與更新的意願,尤其更新會的理事長及理事的信任關係更是更新成敗的關鍵因素,信任關係有助於拉近彼此間之距離,凝聚更新重建共識,降低交易成本,縮短更新整合時程;更新會組織章程即社會規範,促使更新單元內成員放棄自利的行為,依循更新單元整體的利益而行動,克服集體行動上的困難,社會規範有利於社區逐步實現更新重建的目標。

二、透過本研究的調查與分析結果,本研究提出以下建議:(1)社區應多舉辦活動或建立社區網站,以強化網絡聯繫,凝聚重建共識;(2)更新資訊公開透明並定期公布財務,以昭公信,可加速更新事業之進行;(3)訂定規範以為更新會會員遵循準則,以增加信任感,透過良好的規範制度的運作及管理,可以增強整體更新事業的行動力與效率,達成集體行動之共同利益。

關鍵字:社會資本、都市更新會、都市更新
With the rapid growth of economic and urbanization in Taiwan, the early developed old districts have declined gradually. Due to the lack of public facilities and low quality of environment, urban renewal has become an important constructive tool to alleviate the land use, industry development and living environment issues. Because of the complicated property rights, too many owners among the old houses and the 4-5 floor apartments which had been built thirty years ago, the developers reveal no incentive to intervene. The practicable method is to organize an urban renewal group to access the renewal work. The Taipei city government has assisted 25 urban renewal organizations before 30 Mar. 2009, but only two cases were completed. Both of them were the reconstruction cases of 921 earthquake. This result indicates the difficulties exist in the urban renewal cases processed by the urban renewal group.

This thesis tries to explore the relation between social capital and urban renewal projects in terms of social network, social trust, and social norms. It makes a hypothesis that social network relation, social trust relation, and social norms in a group would affect people to participate the urban renewal project. Through the questionnaire and interview of directors of social renewal group to understand before and after the reconstruction, whether social network relation, trust relation and the design of regulation in a renewal group would effect the success of reconstruction work, also to understand the change of social capital during the renewal period. This thesis hopes to build " the promotion and regulation by urban renewal group" through the investigation and research of " urban renewal group" to provide some useful reference and recommendation for the public to promote urban renewal business integration. The conclusion and suggestions of this thesis are as follows:

1.According to the result of interview and questionnaires in the assessment of execution of urban renewal group, it is found that social network influences the owners` willing to participate the urban renewal project. The more vigorous of the social network, the smoother the reconstruction work can be. The social trust relation of the renewal group founder would influence the owners` willing to participate the urban renewal. And the social trust relation of the general director and the directors would be the key persons of whether the urban renewal will be successfull or not in a urban renewal group. The trust relation helps to reduce the distance between the renewal group and the owners, cohere the renewal reconstruction co-awareness, reduce the transaction cost, and shorten renewal integration schedule. The regulation of the urban renewal group means the social norms, which stimulate the renewal unit members to give up the self-interest behavior, instead they act according to the renewal unit`s entire interest and overcome the difficult of collective action. Further, social norm advances the community to fulfill the target of renewal reconstruction gradually.

2.Through the investigation and analysis, this thesis provides some suggestions as below:(1)Community should hold more activities or build up community website to reinforce the network relation and to cohere reconstruction co-awareness.(2)Renewal information should be transparent and the finance situation should be announced regularly to earn public trust.(3)Norms should be established as the rules to regulate the renewal members and render trust. Further, through operating and managing the well regulation system, the action power and efficiency of the whole urban renewal business can be reinforced and thus the co-interest of collective action can be achieved.

Keywords:Social Capital, Urban Renewal Group, Urban Renewal
參考文獻 壹、中文文獻(依筆畫順序排列)
丁東紅,2005,『社會資本的啟示』, (當代西方哲學思潮之八),學習時報社,北京。
方鳴濤律師,1999,邁向21世紀都市更新研討會大會實錄,民間自組更新團體之推動。
王中天,2003,「社會資本 :概念,源起、及現況」,『問題與研究』,第42卷第5期,民國92年9、10月:139~156。
包亞明,1997,『Bourdieu訪談錄:文化資本與社會資本煉金術』,上海:上海人民出版社。
江明修,2004,『充實社會資本之研究,行政院經濟建設委員會委託之專題研究報告』,台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
何芳子、丁致成,2006,「日本都市更新密碼」,台北,財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會。
呂桂英,2003,「社區發展與文化重建-虎尾西安社區白鶴文化節與褒忠大廍社區花鼓節的比較研究」,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文:嘉義。
李惠斌、楊雪冬,2000,『社會資本與社會發展』,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
李宛蓉譯,原著:Fukuyama,F.,1995,『信任:社會德性與繁榮的創造』,台北:立緒。
李鴻漢,2004,「以社區營造推動都市更新整建及維護機制之研究-以台北市老舊住宅社區為例」,中國文化大學環境設計學院建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文:台北。
李其芳,2006,「社區方案推動對社會資本創造之影響-以南投縣桃米社區為例」,國立暨南國際大學成人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文:南投。
林 南,2001,「社會資本:爭鳴的範式和實證的檢驗」,2001年第二期『香港社會學學報』,香港社會學學會、香港中文大學社會學系、中文大學出版社聯合出版,頁1-38。
林 南,2004,「教育制度與社會資本」,第五十輯第四期『教育研究集刊』,國立台灣師範大學教育學系發行,頁1-16。
林 南,2007,「社會資本理論與研究簡介」,國立政治大學社會科學學院、五南圖書出版有限公司共同發行:『社會科學論叢』,頁1-32。
林佑璘,2003,「台北市實施都市更新歷程及影響之研究」,中國文化大學環境設計學院建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文:台北。
林育建,2005,「社會資本與社區總體營造:以屏東縣五溝客家社區為例」,鄭興弟(主持人),非營利部門,第四屆地方發展策略研討會暨公共事務與公共行政青年論壇,佛光人文社會學院。
洪貴源,2001,「社區住民自辦都市更新程序與權利變換之研究」,淡江大學建築學系碩士論文:台北。
香港青年協會,2002,「社會資本之網絡聯繫、信任及互惠狀況的研究」,香港:香港青年協會。
財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會,2002,『都市更新魔法書』,台北:財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會。
陳孝庭,2004,「社會資本與公民參與關係之研究—以台北市為例」,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系研究所碩士論文:台北。
陳欽春,2005,「公共行政與社會資本」,發表於2005年1月8日國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系「公共行政與社會資本」圓桌論壇。
陳恆鈞,2002,『政策執行與治理互賴』,台北:商鼎文化。
楊松齡,2000,「以權利變換方式進行都市更新之評議」,『人與地』,203,204:41。
張友怡,1998,「私部門辦理都市更新問題之研究」,國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文:台北。
張磊譯,原著:Lin,N.(2005)『社會資本—關於社會結構與行動理論』,上海:上海人民出版社。
游宗憲,2005,「組織信任與組織公民行為之研究:社會資本觀點之初探」,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
黃健二,1984,『都市更新之研究』,台北:大佳出版社。
黃健二、王章凱,2005,「從日本小泉內閣「都市再生」的推動看我國都市更新的觀念瓶頸」,發表於<中華民國都市計劃學會、區域科學學會、地區發展學會二○○五聯合年會暨論文研討會>,台北,民國94年12月。
黃美傳,2001,「社會網絡與地方產業文化發展─白河蓮花節與官田菱角節之比較研究」,國立台灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文。
黃定國,1998,『都市老舊住宅社區更新規劃及開發原則之研究』,黃定國計畫主持;彭光輝共同主持;內政部建築研究所主辦,台北市:內政部建築研究所。
黃立凱,2002,「社區網絡對於居民社會資本之影響」,元智大學資訊社會研究所碩士論文:中壢。
彭安麗,2004,「組織知識管理能力之研究:社會資本的觀點」,國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文:台北。
蔡勳雄等,2001,都市發展與都市更新,財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政研究報告。,台北,本文摘自:http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SD/090/SD-R-090-015.htm
蔡必焜、王俊豪、卓正欽,2004,「社會資本與永續社區發展」,『台灣鄉村研究』第3期:53~76。
蔡翼如,2003,「社會資本、地方發展網絡與空間組織之研究-以烏來鄉為例」,國立台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文:台北。
鄧方譯,原著:Coleman,J.S.,1992,『社會理論的基礎』,台北:五南。
鄧方譯,原著:Coleman,J.S.,1999,『社會理論的基礎』,北京市:社會科學文獻出版社。
劉少杰,2002,『後現代西方社會學理論』,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
賴宗裕,2007,『成長管理專題研究課程講義』,國立政治大學地政學系。
顏志安,2006,「社會資本的生成與變遷-以阿里山茶山村為例」,中央警察大學行政管理研究所碩士論文:桃園。
鍾俊宏,2006,「社區網絡與社會資本形成之探討-以桃米坑生態村為例」,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文:台北。
邊泰明,2000,『都市更新方針之研究-以三峽都市計畫為例』,內政部營建署市鄉規劃局委託研究。
邊泰明,2003,『土地使用規劃與財產權』,初版,台北:詹氏書局。
顧忠華,2005,『解讀社會力:台灣的學習社會和公民社會』,台北:左岸文化。
貮、外文文獻
Ahn, T.K. and Ostrom, E., 2002, Social Capital and The Second-Generation Theories of Collective Action:An Analytical Approach to The Forms of Social Capital, Prepared for delivery at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29-September 1.
Albrow, M., 1999, Sociology:The Basic, London:Routledge.
Baker, W., 1990, Market Networks and Corporate Behavior, American Journal of Sociology, pp.619
Boix, C., and D. N. Posner, 1998, Social Capital:Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance, British Journal of Political Science, 28, (4) pp.686-693
Bourdieu, P., 1986, The Forms of Capital, In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp.241-258,Westport,CT: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P., 2002, The Forms of Capital, in Readings in Economic Sociology, Edited by N.W. Biggart, pp.287-291 Malden:Blackwell.
Brehm,J. and W. Rahn,1997,Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital, American Journal of Political Science 41(3)pp.999-1023.
Briggs, Xavier de Souza, 1997, Social Capital and the Cities:Advice to Change Agents, National Civic Review, 86(2) pp.111-118.
Burt, R.S., 1992, Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Social Competition, pp.8~10,Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Burt, R.S., 1997, The Contingent Value of Social Capitial, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.339-365
Coleman,J. S.,1988, Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology,pp.95-121.
Coleman,J. S.,1990, The Foundation of Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
Couto, R. A. and C. S. Guthrie, 1999, Making Democracy Work Better: Mediating Structures, Social Capitial, and the Democratic Prospect, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Freudenburg,W.1986,The Density of Acquaintanceship:An Overlooked Variable in Community Research?American Journal Sociology ,92 pp.27-63.
Foster, F. & Ken Frank, 2000, The Value of a Social Capital Framework for Understanding Coalition Formation and Sustainability, draft presented at the conference of the Social Capital:Bridging Across Disciplines, Michigan State University.
Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York:Free Press.
Granovetter, M. 1973, The Strength of Week Tie, American Journal of Sociology, 78 pp.1360-1380
Granovetter, M. 1985, Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481-510
Hall, P., 1999, Social Capital in Britain, British Journal of Political Science, 29 pp.417-461
Lin, N., 1999, Building a Network Theory of Social Capital, Connections, 22 (1) pp.28-51
Loury, G., 1992, The Economics of Discrimination:Getting to the Core of the Problem, Harvard Journal for African American Public Policy, pp.100
North, Douglass C., 1990, Institution, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Olson, Mancur.著, 1971, The Logic of Collective Action,董安琪譯,1984,「集體行動的邏輯」,允晨文化實業股份有限公司。
Olson, Mancur.著, 1971, The Logic of Collective Action,陳郁等譯,1995,上海:上海三聯書店,上海人民出版社。
Paxton, P., 1999, Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment, American Journal of Sociology, 105, (1) pp.88-127
Pearce, J. L. and Randel A. E.2004, Expectations of Organizational Mobility, Workplace Social Inclusion and Employee Job Performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25,pp.81-98
Perrucci, R. and M. Pilisuk ,1970, Leaders and Ruling Elites:the Interoganizational Based of Community Power, American Sociological Review, 35(Dec)pp.1040-1057
PIU, 2002, Social Capital :A Discussion Paper, Performance and Innovation Unit(UK), April 2002
Putnam, R. D., 1993, The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life, The American Prospect, 4(13)pp.35-42
Putnam, R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work:Civil Traditions in Modern
Italy, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D., 1995a, Bowling Alone:American Declining Social Capital, Journal of Democracy, Vol.61, pp.65-78
Rose, R., 1998, Getting Things Done in an Anti-Modern Society: Social Capital Networks in Russia, Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No.6, pp.1-23, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Sidney, Callahan, 1996, The Capital that Counts, Commonwealth, 123, (20) pp.7-8
Smith, H. M., 1999, Understanding Economics, New York:M.E. Sharpe.
Uslaner, E. M., 1999a, Democracy and Social Capital, in Mark E. Warren, ed., Democracy and Trust, Cambridge University Press.
Stolle, D. and Thomas R. Rochon, 1998, Are All Associations Alike? Member Diversity, Associational Type, and the Creation of Social Capital, American Behavioral Scientist, 42,(1) pp.47-65
Woolcock, Michael, 1998, Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework, Theory and Society, Vol.27, pp.151-208
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
94923022
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094923022
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 賴宗裕zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李金桂zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 李金桂zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-Sep-2009 13:14:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Sep-2009 13:14:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Sep-2009 13:14:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094923022en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37348-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94923022zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 台灣地區由於經濟快速成長,都市化迅速,使得早期發展之舊市區逐漸呈現衰頹之景象,公共設施嚴重不足,環境品質低落,都市更新遂成為可以用來紓解舊市區土地使用、產業發展與居住環境課題之重要建設工具。臺北市早期發展之老舊住宅及屋齡在30年以上之四、五層樓以下之公寓住宅,因產權複雜所有權人眾多,整合曠日廢時又無利可圖,故開發商不願意介入,較可行的途徑是自組都市更新會辦理更新工作。至98年3月30日止,台北市政府協助自組更新團體共計25案,更新完成個案僅2件,且都為921災後重建案例,顯示都市更新會辦理更新仍有相當的困難度。
本研究嘗試從社會資本的構成內涵-社會網絡、社會信任、社會規範三大面向分析,假設更新單元內社會網絡關係、社會信任關係及社會規範會影響其參與更新意願,透過問卷及深入訪談都市更新會理監事,了解在更新重建前後,更新單元內網絡關係、信任關係及章程規範的設計對重建工作順利與否的影響,以及更新期間更新單元內社會資本的變化。本研究希冀透過對「都市更新會」的調查、研究,試圖建構「都市更新會之推動及規範機制」提供民間自辦都市更新事業整合推動之參考與建議。茲將本研究之結論與建議簡述如下:

一、根據訪談及問卷調查結果,各都市更新會執行更新成效上,可以發現,社會網絡影響所有權人參與更新之意願,社區網絡關係愈活絡,對更新重建工作推動愈順利;更新會發起人的信任關係影響所有權人參與更新的意願,尤其更新會的理事長及理事的信任關係更是更新成敗的關鍵因素,信任關係有助於拉近彼此間之距離,凝聚更新重建共識,降低交易成本,縮短更新整合時程;更新會組織章程即社會規範,促使更新單元內成員放棄自利的行為,依循更新單元整體的利益而行動,克服集體行動上的困難,社會規範有利於社區逐步實現更新重建的目標。

二、透過本研究的調查與分析結果,本研究提出以下建議:(1)社區應多舉辦活動或建立社區網站,以強化網絡聯繫,凝聚重建共識;(2)更新資訊公開透明並定期公布財務,以昭公信,可加速更新事業之進行;(3)訂定規範以為更新會會員遵循準則,以增加信任感,透過良好的規範制度的運作及管理,可以增強整體更新事業的行動力與效率,達成集體行動之共同利益。

關鍵字:社會資本、都市更新會、都市更新
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the rapid growth of economic and urbanization in Taiwan, the early developed old districts have declined gradually. Due to the lack of public facilities and low quality of environment, urban renewal has become an important constructive tool to alleviate the land use, industry development and living environment issues. Because of the complicated property rights, too many owners among the old houses and the 4-5 floor apartments which had been built thirty years ago, the developers reveal no incentive to intervene. The practicable method is to organize an urban renewal group to access the renewal work. The Taipei city government has assisted 25 urban renewal organizations before 30 Mar. 2009, but only two cases were completed. Both of them were the reconstruction cases of 921 earthquake. This result indicates the difficulties exist in the urban renewal cases processed by the urban renewal group.

This thesis tries to explore the relation between social capital and urban renewal projects in terms of social network, social trust, and social norms. It makes a hypothesis that social network relation, social trust relation, and social norms in a group would affect people to participate the urban renewal project. Through the questionnaire and interview of directors of social renewal group to understand before and after the reconstruction, whether social network relation, trust relation and the design of regulation in a renewal group would effect the success of reconstruction work, also to understand the change of social capital during the renewal period. This thesis hopes to build " the promotion and regulation by urban renewal group" through the investigation and research of " urban renewal group" to provide some useful reference and recommendation for the public to promote urban renewal business integration. The conclusion and suggestions of this thesis are as follows:

1.According to the result of interview and questionnaires in the assessment of execution of urban renewal group, it is found that social network influences the owners` willing to participate the urban renewal project. The more vigorous of the social network, the smoother the reconstruction work can be. The social trust relation of the renewal group founder would influence the owners` willing to participate the urban renewal. And the social trust relation of the general director and the directors would be the key persons of whether the urban renewal will be successfull or not in a urban renewal group. The trust relation helps to reduce the distance between the renewal group and the owners, cohere the renewal reconstruction co-awareness, reduce the transaction cost, and shorten renewal integration schedule. The regulation of the urban renewal group means the social norms, which stimulate the renewal unit members to give up the self-interest behavior, instead they act according to the renewal unit`s entire interest and overcome the difficult of collective action. Further, social norm advances the community to fulfill the target of renewal reconstruction gradually.

2.Through the investigation and analysis, this thesis provides some suggestions as below:(1)Community should hold more activities or build up community website to reinforce the network relation and to cohere reconstruction co-awareness.(2)Renewal information should be transparent and the finance situation should be announced regularly to earn public trust.(3)Norms should be established as the rules to regulate the renewal members and render trust. Further, through operating and managing the well regulation system, the action power and efficiency of the whole urban renewal business can be reinforced and thus the co-interest of collective action can be achieved.

Keywords:Social Capital, Urban Renewal Group, Urban Renewal
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………………1-1
第一節 研究動機與目的 ……………………………………………………1-1
第二節 研究範圍與內容 ……………………………………………………1-7
第三節 研究方法與流程 ……………………………………………………1-9
第二章 理論基礎及文獻分析 ………………………………………………2-1
第一節 社會資本理論 ………………………………………………………2-1
第二節 相關文獻分析 ………………………………………………………2-25
第三章 中日更新團體探討與個案分析 ……………………………………3-1
第一節 我國都市更新自組更新團體探討 …………………………………3-1
第二節 日本都市更新推動的借鏡 …………………………………………3-18
第三節 個案分析-台北市慶福大樓 ………………………………………3-32
第四章 研究設計與案例分析 ………………………………………………4-1
第一節 研究設計與研究假設 ………………………………………………4-1
第二節 問卷調查結果分析 …………………………………………………4-6
第三節 深入訪談與綜合分析 ………………………………………………4-34
第五章 更新會之推動及規範機制之建構 …………………………………5-1
第一節 社會資本對推動更新重建之影響 …………………………………5-1
第二節 成立更新會之規範機制 ……………………………………………5-7
第三節 更新會實施更新之配套措施 ………………………………………5-26
第六章 結論與建議 …………………………………………………………6-1
第一節 結論 …………………………………………………………………6-1
第二節 後續研究建議 ………………………………………………………6-9
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………參-1
附錄一 自組都市更新會計25案 …………………………………………附1-1
附錄二 問卷調查 ……………………………………………………………附2-1
附錄三 優惠貸款承辦金融機構 ……………………………………………附3-1
附錄四 都市更新會組織章程 ………………………………………………附4-1
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 112017 bytes-
dc.format.extent 142640 bytes-
dc.format.extent 132860 bytes-
dc.format.extent 83263 bytes-
dc.format.extent 165864 bytes-
dc.format.extent 302565 bytes-
dc.format.extent 389926 bytes-
dc.format.extent 504032 bytes-
dc.format.extent 402305 bytes-
dc.format.extent 369871 bytes-
dc.format.extent 253391 bytes-
dc.format.extent 196297 bytes-
dc.format.extent 150766 bytes-
dc.format.extent 230684 bytes-
dc.format.extent 154453 bytes-
dc.format.extent 229175 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094923022en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 都市更新會zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 都市更新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Urban Renewal Groupen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Urban Renewalen_US
dc.title (題名) 運用社會資本自組都市更新會實施更新之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文文獻(依筆畫順序排列)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 丁東紅,2005,『社會資本的啟示』, (當代西方哲學思潮之八),學習時報社,北京。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 方鳴濤律師,1999,邁向21世紀都市更新研討會大會實錄,民間自組更新團體之推動。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王中天,2003,「社會資本 :概念,源起、及現況」,『問題與研究』,第42卷第5期,民國92年9、10月:139~156。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 包亞明,1997,『Bourdieu訪談錄:文化資本與社會資本煉金術』,上海:上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江明修,2004,『充實社會資本之研究,行政院經濟建設委員會委託之專題研究報告』,台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何芳子、丁致成,2006,「日本都市更新密碼」,台北,財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂桂英,2003,「社區發展與文化重建-虎尾西安社區白鶴文化節與褒忠大廍社區花鼓節的比較研究」,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文:嘉義。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李惠斌、楊雪冬,2000,『社會資本與社會發展』,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李宛蓉譯,原著:Fukuyama,F.,1995,『信任:社會德性與繁榮的創造』,台北:立緒。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李鴻漢,2004,「以社區營造推動都市更新整建及維護機制之研究-以台北市老舊住宅社區為例」,中國文化大學環境設計學院建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李其芳,2006,「社區方案推動對社會資本創造之影響-以南投縣桃米社區為例」,國立暨南國際大學成人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文:南投。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林 南,2001,「社會資本:爭鳴的範式和實證的檢驗」,2001年第二期『香港社會學學報』,香港社會學學會、香港中文大學社會學系、中文大學出版社聯合出版,頁1-38。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林 南,2004,「教育制度與社會資本」,第五十輯第四期『教育研究集刊』,國立台灣師範大學教育學系發行,頁1-16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林 南,2007,「社會資本理論與研究簡介」,國立政治大學社會科學學院、五南圖書出版有限公司共同發行:『社會科學論叢』,頁1-32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林佑璘,2003,「台北市實施都市更新歷程及影響之研究」,中國文化大學環境設計學院建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林育建,2005,「社會資本與社區總體營造:以屏東縣五溝客家社區為例」,鄭興弟(主持人),非營利部門,第四屆地方發展策略研討會暨公共事務與公共行政青年論壇,佛光人文社會學院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪貴源,2001,「社區住民自辦都市更新程序與權利變換之研究」,淡江大學建築學系碩士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 香港青年協會,2002,「社會資本之網絡聯繫、信任及互惠狀況的研究」,香港:香港青年協會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會,2002,『都市更新魔法書』,台北:財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳孝庭,2004,「社會資本與公民參與關係之研究—以台北市為例」,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系研究所碩士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳欽春,2005,「公共行政與社會資本」,發表於2005年1月8日國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系「公共行政與社會資本」圓桌論壇。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳恆鈞,2002,『政策執行與治理互賴』,台北:商鼎文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊松齡,2000,「以權利變換方式進行都市更新之評議」,『人與地』,203,204:41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張友怡,1998,「私部門辦理都市更新問題之研究」,國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張磊譯,原著:Lin,N.(2005)『社會資本—關於社會結構與行動理論』,上海:上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 游宗憲,2005,「組織信任與組織公民行為之研究:社會資本觀點之初探」,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃健二,1984,『都市更新之研究』,台北:大佳出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃健二、王章凱,2005,「從日本小泉內閣「都市再生」的推動看我國都市更新的觀念瓶頸」,發表於<中華民國都市計劃學會、區域科學學會、地區發展學會二○○五聯合年會暨論文研討會>,台北,民國94年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃美傳,2001,「社會網絡與地方產業文化發展─白河蓮花節與官田菱角節之比較研究」,國立台灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃定國,1998,『都市老舊住宅社區更新規劃及開發原則之研究』,黃定國計畫主持;彭光輝共同主持;內政部建築研究所主辦,台北市:內政部建築研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃立凱,2002,「社區網絡對於居民社會資本之影響」,元智大學資訊社會研究所碩士論文:中壢。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 彭安麗,2004,「組織知識管理能力之研究:社會資本的觀點」,國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡勳雄等,2001,都市發展與都市更新,財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政研究報告。,台北,本文摘自:http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SD/090/SD-R-090-015.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡必焜、王俊豪、卓正欽,2004,「社會資本與永續社區發展」,『台灣鄉村研究』第3期:53~76。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡翼如,2003,「社會資本、地方發展網絡與空間組織之研究-以烏來鄉為例」,國立台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄧方譯,原著:Coleman,J.S.,1992,『社會理論的基礎』,台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄧方譯,原著:Coleman,J.S.,1999,『社會理論的基礎』,北京市:社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉少杰,2002,『後現代西方社會學理論』,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴宗裕,2007,『成長管理專題研究課程講義』,國立政治大學地政學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏志安,2006,「社會資本的生成與變遷-以阿里山茶山村為例」,中央警察大學行政管理研究所碩士論文:桃園。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鍾俊宏,2006,「社區網絡與社會資本形成之探討-以桃米坑生態村為例」,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文:台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邊泰明,2000,『都市更新方針之研究-以三峽都市計畫為例』,內政部營建署市鄉規劃局委託研究。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邊泰明,2003,『土地使用規劃與財產權』,初版,台北:詹氏書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顧忠華,2005,『解讀社會力:台灣的學習社會和公民社會』,台北:左岸文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 貮、外文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ahn, T.K. and Ostrom, E., 2002, Social Capital and The Second-Generation Theories of Collective Action:An Analytical Approach to The Forms of Social Capital, Prepared for delivery at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29-September 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Albrow, M., 1999, Sociology:The Basic, London:Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, W., 1990, Market Networks and Corporate Behavior, American Journal of Sociology, pp.619zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boix, C., and D. N. Posner, 1998, Social Capital:Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance, British Journal of Political Science, 28, (4) pp.686-693zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bourdieu, P., 1986, The Forms of Capital, In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp.241-258,Westport,CT: Greenwood Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bourdieu, P., 2002, The Forms of Capital, in Readings in Economic Sociology, Edited by N.W. Biggart, pp.287-291 Malden:Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brehm,J. and W. Rahn,1997,Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital, American Journal of Political Science 41(3)pp.999-1023.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Briggs, Xavier de Souza, 1997, Social Capital and the Cities:Advice to Change Agents, National Civic Review, 86(2) pp.111-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burt, R.S., 1992, Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Social Competition, pp.8~10,Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burt, R.S., 1997, The Contingent Value of Social Capitial, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.339-365zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coleman,J. S.,1988, Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology,pp.95-121.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coleman,J. S.,1990, The Foundation of Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Couto, R. A. and C. S. Guthrie, 1999, Making Democracy Work Better: Mediating Structures, Social Capitial, and the Democratic Prospect, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Freudenburg,W.1986,The Density of Acquaintanceship:An Overlooked Variable in Community Research?American Journal Sociology ,92 pp.27-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foster, F. & Ken Frank, 2000, The Value of a Social Capital Framework for Understanding Coalition Formation and Sustainability, draft presented at the conference of the Social Capital:Bridging Across Disciplines, Michigan State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York:Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Granovetter, M. 1973, The Strength of Week Tie, American Journal of Sociology, 78 pp.1360-1380zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Granovetter, M. 1985, Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481-510zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, P., 1999, Social Capital in Britain, British Journal of Political Science, 29 pp.417-461zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lin, N., 1999, Building a Network Theory of Social Capital, Connections, 22 (1) pp.28-51zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Loury, G., 1992, The Economics of Discrimination:Getting to the Core of the Problem, Harvard Journal for African American Public Policy, pp.100zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) North, Douglass C., 1990, Institution, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Olson, Mancur.著, 1971, The Logic of Collective Action,董安琪譯,1984,「集體行動的邏輯」,允晨文化實業股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Olson, Mancur.著, 1971, The Logic of Collective Action,陳郁等譯,1995,上海:上海三聯書店,上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paxton, P., 1999, Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment, American Journal of Sociology, 105, (1) pp.88-127zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pearce, J. L. and Randel A. E.2004, Expectations of Organizational Mobility, Workplace Social Inclusion and Employee Job Performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25,pp.81-98zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perrucci, R. and M. Pilisuk ,1970, Leaders and Ruling Elites:the Interoganizational Based of Community Power, American Sociological Review, 35(Dec)pp.1040-1057zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) PIU, 2002, Social Capital :A Discussion Paper, Performance and Innovation Unit(UK), April 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Putnam, R. D., 1993, The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life, The American Prospect, 4(13)pp.35-42zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Putnam, R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work:Civil Traditions in Modernzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Italy, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Putnam, R. D., 1995a, Bowling Alone:American Declining Social Capital, Journal of Democracy, Vol.61, pp.65-78zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rose, R., 1998, Getting Things Done in an Anti-Modern Society: Social Capital Networks in Russia, Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No.6, pp.1-23, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sidney, Callahan, 1996, The Capital that Counts, Commonwealth, 123, (20) pp.7-8zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, H. M., 1999, Understanding Economics, New York:M.E. Sharpe.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Uslaner, E. M., 1999a, Democracy and Social Capital, in Mark E. Warren, ed., Democracy and Trust, Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stolle, D. and Thomas R. Rochon, 1998, Are All Associations Alike? Member Diversity, Associational Type, and the Creation of Social Capital, American Behavioral Scientist, 42,(1) pp.47-65zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Woolcock, Michael, 1998, Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework, Theory and Society, Vol.27, pp.151-208zh_TW