學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 女性社會資本回收劣勢的機制:性別化社會資本與獲得職位女性比例
作者 蕭彩含
Hsiao, Tsai Han
貢獻者 熊瑞梅
Hsung, Ray May
蕭彩含
Hsiao, Tsai Han
關鍵詞 社會資本
回報欠缺
職位女性比例
職業性別隔離
性別不平等
性別化
social capital
return deficit
sex segregation
gender inequality
日期 2008
上傳時間 19-Sep-2009 13:34:26 (UTC+8)
摘要 時至今日女性教育程度提高,但女性在勞動力市場獲得的職位並沒有因此提升,大部分的女性仍然傾向集中在以女性居多的劣勢職業,並且薪資明顯低於男性居多的職業。相關研究提醒我們注意接觸工作出缺訊息的管道在進入勞動力市場前就已經出現性別化的現象,男女性的社會網絡並不相同,並且不同性別的求職者傾向動員不同性別的中介人。但究竟是原因使得女性求職者持續進入待遇較差的女性主導職業?Lin(1999)認為男性之所以比女性在勞動力市場的職業獲得更具有優勢,是因為女性求職者存在資本欠缺與回報欠缺,所以只能動員到較劣勢的女性中介人、獲得較差的工作。但從資料分析顯示,女性求職者並不存在資本欠缺,女性求職者擁有的社會資本量並不比男性求職者少,真正導致女性承受回報欠缺的原因在於兩點勞動力市場對於女性的貶值與性別化社會資本的差異。由於勞動力市場對女性求職者本身的歧視,即使女性求職者動員到擁有較多資源的男性中介人也無法有效的脫離求職劣勢。其次,女性求職者透過性別化社會資本尋職而承受回報欠缺的因素在於女性化可觸及社會資本,女性化可觸及社會資本直透過接與間接的效果同時限制女性求職者獲得較好的、女性比例較低職業。但女性化可觸及社會資本對男性求職者只能產生間接影響,且男性求職者擁有的女性化可觸及社會資本比女性求職者來得少很多,女性化可觸及社會資本能發揮的效果並不多。
總結來說,對於女性求職者而言,回報欠缺主要來自於性別化可觸及社會資本以及雇主對女性能力的貶值、統計歧視等,即使接觸到男性中介人也無助於女性跳脫求職劣勢。對於男性而言則是性別化可動員社會資本才是主要直接影響獲得職業女性比例的關鍵因素。
參考文獻 孫清山、熊瑞梅、許志松,1986,製造業勞工的社會連繫強度與轉業行為。台大社會學刊18:1-24.
張晉芬、杜素豪,2008,Merits or Less Discrimination? Explaining Gender Gap of
Earnings in Taiwan between 1993 and 2006。發表於「台灣的社會變遷,
1985-2005:台灣社會變遷第11次研討會」。台北,南港。
Bian, Yanjie. 1997. ”Bringing strong ties back in : Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China “American Journal of Sociology, 62:366-85.
Bielby, William T. and JN Baron. 1986” Sex segregation within occupations” The American Economic Review 76:43-47
Bielby, William T. and Denise D. Bielby. 1992.”I Will Follow Him:Family Ties, Gender Role Beliefs, and Reluctance to Relocation for a Better Job.” American Journal of Sociology 97:1241-67.
Burt, Ronald S. 1998. “The gender of social capital.” Rationality and Society. 10:5-46.
Cheung, Chau-kiu and Yong Gui. 2006. “Job Referral in China: The Advantages of StrongTies.” Human Relations 59:847-72.
Chen , Chih-jou and Yu ,Te-lin. 2008. “Job Search in Three Societies: Gender, Contacts, and Network Chains” Present at the International Social Capital Conference, Taiwan.
Chow, Esther Ngan-ling and Ray-May Hsung. 2002. “Gendered organizations, embodiment, and employment among manufacturing workers in Taiwan” Chapter 4 in Transforming gender and development in East Asia, edited by Chow, Esther Ngan-ling. N.Y.:Routledge.
Correll,SJ and S Benard and I Paik.2007.” Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?” The American Journal of Sociology,112:1297-338.
Ensel ,Walter M.1979.” Sex, social ties, and status attainment.” NY: State University                 of New York at Albany.
England, paula.1991. ” From status attainment to segregation and devaluation”
Contemporary Sociology 21:643-47.
-1992.” Comparable worth: Theories and evidence” NY Aldine.
England, paula and Barbara Stanek Kilbourne. 1994a. “Markets, Marriages, and Other Mates: The Problem of Power.” Pp.163-88 in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economic and Society, edited by R.Friedland and A. F. Robertson. N.Y.:Aldine de Gruyter.
-1994b” Return to Skill, Compensating Differentials,and Gender Bias:Effects of Occupational Characteristics on the Wages of White Women and Men.”American Journal of Sociology 100:689-719.
Fernandez, Roberto and Nancy Weinberg. 1997. "Personal Contacts and Hiring in a Retail Bank." American Sociological Review 62:883- 902.
Fernandez ,Roberto M. and M. Lourdes Sosa. 2005 “Gendering the Job: Networks
and Recruitment at a Call Center” American Journal of Sociology 111:859–904.
Fernandez,Roberto M. and Isabel Fernandez-Mateo. 2006“Networks, Race, and Hiring”. American Sociological Review 71: 42-71.
Flap,Henk and Ed Boxman. 2000. “Getting started:The influence of social capital on the start of the occupational career” Chapter 7 in the Social Capital: Theory and Research .edited by Nan Lin, Karen S. Cook and Ronald S. Burt. New York: Aldine de Gruyter .
Fiorentine ,R.1993” Theories of Gender Stratification:Assumptions, Evidence, and "Agency" and "Equity" Implications ” Rationality and Society 5:341-66.
Fischer,CS and SJ Oliker. 1983. “A Research Note on Friendship, Gender, and the
Life Cycle.” Social Forces 62:124.
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-80.
-1974. Getting a Job. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology91:481-510.
Hanson,S and G Prat. 1991. ” Job search and the occupational segregation of women.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81:229 -53
Hartmann, Heidi, Stephen J. Rose and Vicky Lovell. 2006.” How Much Progress in Closing the Long-Term Earnings Gap?” Chapter 5 in the Declining Significance of Gender? edited by Francine D. Blau, Mary C. Brinton and David B. Grusky. NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
Ibarra, Herminia. 1992. “Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm.“Administrative Science Quarterly. 37:422-47.
Jacobs,JA. 1989. “Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women`s careers” Stanford University Press.
Kauppinen-Toropainen, Kaisa, Irja Kandolin, Elina Haavio-Mannila. 1988. ” Sex Segregation of Work in Finland and the Quality of Women`s Work” Journal of Organizational Behavior. 9:15-27.
Lin, Nan. 1981a. “Social Resources and Strength of Ties- Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment.” American Sociological Review 46:393-405.
¬¬-1981b.” Social Resources and Occupational Status Attainment.” Social Forces59:1163-81
-1999. ”Social Networks and Status Attainment” Annual Review of Sociology25:467-87
-2000. “Inequality in Social Capital” Contemporary Sociology29:785-95
-2001.Social Captital-A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press
Lin ,Nan, Yang-chih Fu, and Ray-May Hsung. 2001, “Social Capital and Socioeconomic Attainment in Taiwan.” Pp. 57-84 in Social Capital: Theory and Research. edited by Nan Lin, Karen Kook, and Ronald Burt. In. Aldine de Gruyter Pub..
Marsden, Peter V. 1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans” American Sociological Review 52:122-31
Marsden, Peter V. and Jeanne S. Hurlbert. 1988. “Social Resource and MobilitynOutcomes:A Replication and Extension.” Social Forces66:1038-59
Moerbeek Hester, Wout Ultee, and Henk Flap. 1995. ”That"s What Friends Are For:Ascribed and Achieved Social Capital in Occupational Carrer.” Present at the The European Social Network Conference, Landon.
Montgomery, James D.1992.”Job Search and Network Composition: Implications of the Strength-Of-Weak-Ties Hypothesis.” American Sociological Review 57: 586-96.
Mouw, Ted. 2003. “Social Capital and Finding a Job: Do Contacts Matter?” American
Sociological Review 68:868-98.
Petersen, Trond and Ishak Saporta.2004.” The Opportunity Structure for
Discrimination” The American Journal of Sociology 109: 852-901.
Strober, MH.1984. “Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations,
remedies” National Academy Press.
Reskin , Barbara F. and Patricia A. Roos.1984. “Institutional Factors Contributing to Sex Segregation in the Workplace” Chapter 13 in the Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. edited by Barbara F. Reskin. National Academy Press.
-1990.” Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women`s Inroads Into Male
Occupations.” Temple University Press.
¬¬-1993. "Sex Segregation in the Workplace." American Sociological Review19:241-70.
Ridgeway,Cecilia L.1997. “Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment” American Sociological Review 62:218-35.
Ridgeway,Cecilia L. and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations” Gender and Society18:510-31.
Wegener, Bernd. 1991 “Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment.” American Sociological Review 56:60-71.
Yakubovich, Valery. 2005. “Weak Ties, Information, and Influence: How Workers Find Jobsin a Local Russian Labor Market.” American Sociological Review 70:408-21.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
96254011
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096254011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 熊瑞梅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hsung, Ray Mayen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蕭彩含zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsiao, Tsai Hanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蕭彩含zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsiao, Tsai Hanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-Sep-2009 13:34:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Sep-2009 13:34:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Sep-2009 13:34:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096254011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37400-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 社會學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96254011zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 時至今日女性教育程度提高,但女性在勞動力市場獲得的職位並沒有因此提升,大部分的女性仍然傾向集中在以女性居多的劣勢職業,並且薪資明顯低於男性居多的職業。相關研究提醒我們注意接觸工作出缺訊息的管道在進入勞動力市場前就已經出現性別化的現象,男女性的社會網絡並不相同,並且不同性別的求職者傾向動員不同性別的中介人。但究竟是原因使得女性求職者持續進入待遇較差的女性主導職業?Lin(1999)認為男性之所以比女性在勞動力市場的職業獲得更具有優勢,是因為女性求職者存在資本欠缺與回報欠缺,所以只能動員到較劣勢的女性中介人、獲得較差的工作。但從資料分析顯示,女性求職者並不存在資本欠缺,女性求職者擁有的社會資本量並不比男性求職者少,真正導致女性承受回報欠缺的原因在於兩點勞動力市場對於女性的貶值與性別化社會資本的差異。由於勞動力市場對女性求職者本身的歧視,即使女性求職者動員到擁有較多資源的男性中介人也無法有效的脫離求職劣勢。其次,女性求職者透過性別化社會資本尋職而承受回報欠缺的因素在於女性化可觸及社會資本,女性化可觸及社會資本直透過接與間接的效果同時限制女性求職者獲得較好的、女性比例較低職業。但女性化可觸及社會資本對男性求職者只能產生間接影響,且男性求職者擁有的女性化可觸及社會資本比女性求職者來得少很多,女性化可觸及社會資本能發揮的效果並不多。
總結來說,對於女性求職者而言,回報欠缺主要來自於性別化可觸及社會資本以及雇主對女性能力的貶值、統計歧視等,即使接觸到男性中介人也無助於女性跳脫求職劣勢。對於男性而言則是性別化可動員社會資本才是主要直接影響獲得職業女性比例的關鍵因素。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論
第一節、研究動機………………………………………………… 1
第二節、研究目的………………………………………………… 3
第二章、文獻探討
第一節、職業性別隔離…………………………………………… 5
第二節、地位取得的社會資本模型……………………………… 10
第三節、性別化可觸及社會資本與可動員社會資本…………… 14
一、性別化可觸及社會資……………………………………… 14
二、性別化可動員社會資本…………………………………… 18
第三章、研究方法
第一節、研究架構與研究假設……………………………………… 21
第二節、資料來源…………………………………………………… 23
第三節、變項測量與分析方法……………………………………… 25
一、變項測量……………………………………………………… 25
二、分析方法……………………………………………………… 28
第四章、研究發現
第一節、基本資料檢定……………………………………………… 30
一、 職業性別隔離與職業聲望T檢定、……………………… 30
求職者性別與獲得職業女性比例T方檢定
二、男性、女性樣本變項摘要…………………………………… 31
三、求職者性別與性別化可觸及社會資本T檢定…………… 35
四、性別化可動員社會資本與獲得職業女性比例T檢定…… 36
第二節、多元迴歸分析……………………………………………… 38
一、性別化社會資本與女性主導職位………………………… 38
二、女性樣本的性別化社會資本與女性主導職位…………… 42
三、男性樣本的性別化社會資本與女性主導職位…………… 45
四、因果模型…………………………………………………… 48
第五章、結論.
第一節、研究主要發現與討論.……………………………………… 58
第二節、研究限制與建議.…………………………………………… 63
參考書目……………………………………………………………… 66
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 147453 bytes-
dc.format.extent 195091 bytes-
dc.format.extent 177713 bytes-
dc.format.extent 164959 bytes-
dc.format.extent 199751 bytes-
dc.format.extent 296971 bytes-
dc.format.extent 312260 bytes-
dc.format.extent 425186 bytes-
dc.format.extent 226521 bytes-
dc.format.extent 173774 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096254011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 回報欠缺zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 職位女性比例zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 職業性別隔離zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別不平等zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) social capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) return deficiten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) sex segregationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) gender inequalityen_US
dc.title (題名) 女性社會資本回收劣勢的機制:性別化社會資本與獲得職位女性比例zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫清山、熊瑞梅、許志松,1986,製造業勞工的社會連繫強度與轉業行為。台大社會學刊18:1-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張晉芬、杜素豪,2008,Merits or Less Discrimination? Explaining Gender Gap ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Earnings in Taiwan between 1993 and 2006。發表於「台灣的社會變遷,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1985-2005:台灣社會變遷第11次研討會」。台北,南港。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bian, Yanjie. 1997. ”Bringing strong ties back in : Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China “American Journal of Sociology, 62:366-85.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bielby, William T. and JN Baron. 1986” Sex segregation within occupations” The American Economic Review 76:43-47zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bielby, William T. and Denise D. Bielby. 1992.”I Will Follow Him:Family Ties, Gender Role Beliefs, and Reluctance to Relocation for a Better Job.” American Journal of Sociology 97:1241-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burt, Ronald S. 1998. “The gender of social capital.” Rationality and Society. 10:5-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cheung, Chau-kiu and Yong Gui. 2006. “Job Referral in China: The Advantages of StrongTies.” Human Relations 59:847-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen , Chih-jou and Yu ,Te-lin. 2008. “Job Search in Three Societies: Gender, Contacts, and Network Chains” Present at the International Social Capital Conference, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chow, Esther Ngan-ling and Ray-May Hsung. 2002. “Gendered organizations, embodiment, and employment among manufacturing workers in Taiwan” Chapter 4 in Transforming gender and development in East Asia, edited by Chow, Esther Ngan-ling. N.Y.:Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Correll,SJ and S Benard and I Paik.2007.” Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?” The American Journal of Sociology,112:1297-338.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ensel ,Walter M.1979.” Sex, social ties, and status attainment.” NY: State University                 of New York at Albany.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) England, paula.1991. ” From status attainment to segregation and devaluation”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Contemporary Sociology 21:643-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -1992.” Comparable worth: Theories and evidence” NY Aldine.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) England, paula and Barbara Stanek Kilbourne. 1994a. “Markets, Marriages, and Other Mates: The Problem of Power.” Pp.163-88 in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economic and Society, edited by R.Friedland and A. F. Robertson. N.Y.:Aldine de Gruyter.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -1994b” Return to Skill, Compensating Differentials,and Gender Bias:Effects of Occupational Characteristics on the Wages of White Women and Men.”American Journal of Sociology 100:689-719.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fernandez, Roberto and Nancy Weinberg. 1997. "Personal Contacts and Hiring in a Retail Bank." American Sociological Review 62:883- 902.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fernandez ,Roberto M. and M. Lourdes Sosa. 2005 “Gendering the Job: Networkszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Recruitment at a Call Center” American Journal of Sociology 111:859–904.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fernandez,Roberto M. and Isabel Fernandez-Mateo. 2006“Networks, Race, and Hiring”. American Sociological Review 71: 42-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flap,Henk and Ed Boxman. 2000. “Getting started:The influence of social capital on the start of the occupational career” Chapter 7 in the Social Capital: Theory and Research .edited by Nan Lin, Karen S. Cook and Ronald S. Burt. New York: Aldine de Gruyter .zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fiorentine ,R.1993” Theories of Gender Stratification:Assumptions, Evidence, and "Agency" and "Equity" Implications ” Rationality and Society 5:341-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fischer,CS and SJ Oliker. 1983. “A Research Note on Friendship, Gender, and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Life Cycle.” Social Forces 62:124.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -1974. Getting a Job. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology91:481-510.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hanson,S and G Prat. 1991. ” Job search and the occupational segregation of women.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81:229 -53zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hartmann, Heidi, Stephen J. Rose and Vicky Lovell. 2006.” How Much Progress in Closing the Long-Term Earnings Gap?” Chapter 5 in the Declining Significance of Gender? edited by Francine D. Blau, Mary C. Brinton and David B. Grusky. NY:Russell Sage Foundation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ibarra, Herminia. 1992. “Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm.“Administrative Science Quarterly. 37:422-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacobs,JA. 1989. “Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women`s careers” Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kauppinen-Toropainen, Kaisa, Irja Kandolin, Elina Haavio-Mannila. 1988. ” Sex Segregation of Work in Finland and the Quality of Women`s Work” Journal of Organizational Behavior. 9:15-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lin, Nan. 1981a. “Social Resources and Strength of Ties- Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment.” American Sociological Review 46:393-405.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ¬¬-1981b.” Social Resources and Occupational Status Attainment.” Social Forces59:1163-81zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -1999. ”Social Networks and Status Attainment” Annual Review of Sociology25:467-87zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -2000. “Inequality in Social Capital” Contemporary Sociology29:785-95zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -2001.Social Captital-A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Presszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lin ,Nan, Yang-chih Fu, and Ray-May Hsung. 2001, “Social Capital and Socioeconomic Attainment in Taiwan.” Pp. 57-84 in Social Capital: Theory and Research. edited by Nan Lin, Karen Kook, and Ronald Burt. In. Aldine de Gruyter Pub..zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marsden, Peter V. 1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans” American Sociological Review 52:122-31zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marsden, Peter V. and Jeanne S. Hurlbert. 1988. “Social Resource and MobilitynOutcomes:A Replication and Extension.” Social Forces66:1038-59zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moerbeek Hester, Wout Ultee, and Henk Flap. 1995. ”That"s What Friends Are For:Ascribed and Achieved Social Capital in Occupational Carrer.” Present at the The European Social Network Conference, Landon.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Montgomery, James D.1992.”Job Search and Network Composition: Implications of the Strength-Of-Weak-Ties Hypothesis.” American Sociological Review 57: 586-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mouw, Ted. 2003. “Social Capital and Finding a Job: Do Contacts Matter?” Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sociological Review 68:868-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Petersen, Trond and Ishak Saporta.2004.” The Opportunity Structure forzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Discrimination” The American Journal of Sociology 109: 852-901.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strober, MH.1984. “Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) remedies” National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reskin , Barbara F. and Patricia A. Roos.1984. “Institutional Factors Contributing to Sex Segregation in the Workplace” Chapter 13 in the Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. edited by Barbara F. Reskin. National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -1990.” Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women`s Inroads Into Malezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Occupations.” Temple University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ¬¬-1993. "Sex Segregation in the Workplace." American Sociological Review19:241-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ridgeway,Cecilia L.1997. “Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment” American Sociological Review 62:218-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ridgeway,Cecilia L. and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations” Gender and Society18:510-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wegener, Bernd. 1991 “Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment.” American Sociological Review 56:60-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yakubovich, Valery. 2005. “Weak Ties, Information, and Influence: How Workers Find Jobsin a Local Russian Labor Market.” American Sociological Review 70:408-21.zh_TW