Publications-Theses

題名 台糖開創蝴蝶蘭產業組織新制度分析
作者 黃瀚諄
Huang,Han Chun
貢獻者 熊瑞梅
黃瀚諄
Huang,Han Chun
關鍵詞 新制度理論
知識創新
知識擴散
質化比較分析法
QCA
網絡分析
蝴蝶蘭產業
台糖
台糖公司
日期 2007
上傳時間 19-Sep-2009 13:34:35 (UTC+8)
摘要 1985年開始,台糖公司在不與民爭利的原則下拓展蝴蝶蘭事業的發展,延續台灣社會對於蝴蝶蘭的喜好與優勢,進行花卉產業之商業化;產業的萌生源於隸屬於國營事業體制下的正式化組織,基於組織中制度企業家之社會技能動員組織中的成員且策動策略變革,而讓組織固有的制度優勢得以發揮,也克服了體制僵化的瓶頸,而成就了蝴蝶蘭產業於台灣甚至在世界的發展。

本研究透過田野調查以及非線性之質化比較方法,試圖分析台糖開創蝴蝶蘭產業組織新制度的建構模式。研究時間點的劃分,主要以1985年蝴蝶蘭產業小型試種至2001年組織邁入新紀元為止。事實上,在制度環境的架構上,台糖公司發展新興產業的抉擇,隨時間而有階段性的選擇,凸顯了新制度理論在制度環境變遷上歷史性之偶然的觀點(Mizruchi et al. 2006)。事實上,台糖公司落實蝴蝶蘭產業之發展並使之商業化,必須透過三個面向予以說明,首先,制度環境上,組織透過鬆散式結合之運作邏輯化解正式化組織過於僵化的運作模式,並藉此運用正式化組織之資源,結合組織內外之正向的制度環境,發展領先的蝴蝶蘭經營與栽培能力。另外,能夠如此地善用組織資源與變革制度環境,關鍵在於推展產業時,組織任用具有社會技能的制度企業家,不僅聯繫組織內外之菁英,也創造了獨特的經營模式。最後,制度能夠逐漸形成,必須觀察個體行動對於制度環境日常生活實踐的情形,台糖公司在產業開創之時,因其農業企業公司之特質具備優異的農業知識,又基於台灣民間蝴蝶蘭知識資源深厚,經由非正式的接觸,創造了蝴蝶蘭知識,也透過互動的模式擴散知識的分享。
Taiwan Sugar Company developed an Orchid industry in 1985. It turns flower planting into business in order to continue the advantage in Taiwan. The industry originated from State-owned enterprises, which is the formal way of organization. The organization succeeded in developing orchid industry in the world. It helps that there are entrepreneurs who have the social skills to mobilize members and alter strategies in the organization; therefore, the organization can expand these useful institutions and resolve the institutional myth.

The study used field research and qualitative comparative analysis to analyze the structural model of the organizational institution when Taiwan Sugar Company initiated orchid industry from 1985 to 2001. In fact, choosing the produce for this developing industry depends on different stages. It appears that the viewpoint of new institutional theory is that institutional transformation is historically contingent (Mizruchi et al. 2006). Actually, there are three levels that Taiwan Sugar Company uses to develop orchid industry and turn flower planting into business. First, the organization is loosely coupled with formal organization in order to resolve inconsistencies. Moreover, it uses the resources of formal organization and links institutional environment. There was positive feedback about becoming a pioneer in managing and planting in the orchid industry. Second, because there are entrepreneurs who have social skills, the organization can use the advantage of resources and institutional environment. It not only connects the people who own high capability in orchid, but also creates special business model. Finally, the study surveys individual action in the institutional environment, in order to research and understand how to form an institution. When Taiwan Sugar Company created the orchid industry, it was a state-owned enterprise and had rich knowledge in agriculture; in addition, there is rich knowledge about orchids in Taiwanese society. From interaction between the members in the organization and farmers in society, it has created knowledge in orchids and diffused the knowledge in the field.
參考文獻 中華盆花發展協會,1999,《台灣蝴蝶蘭運銷通路調查報告》。台北:中華盆花發展協會。
中華盆花發展協會,2003,《台灣蝴蝶蘭產銷調查報告》。台北:中華盆花發展協會。
台糖公司,1997,《台糖五十年》。台北:台灣糖業股份有限公司。
台糖公司,2006,《台糖六十週年慶紀念專刊—台灣糖業之演進與再生》。台南:台灣糖業股份有限公司。
台糖通訊,1986,〈創新求變迎接挑戰—台糖四十年緒言〉。袁樹聲撰,78(13)。
台糖通訊,1990,〈本公司參加名古屋國際蘭展剪影〉,營業處撰。86(11)。
台糖通訊,1993,〈花卉拓銷另一章—八十二年度台灣區花卉業者赴日拓銷訪問報告〉,陳明言撰,92(4)。
台糖通訊,1993,〈八十二年度農務會議〉。93(5)。
台糖通訊,1994,〈第七屆國際花展剪影〉,農務處撰。94(10)。
台糖通訊,1995,〈台糖闖出蝴蝶蘭字號〉,董智森撰。96(1)。
台糖通訊,1995,〈本公司積極輔導蔗農轉作蝴蝶蘭〉。97(1)。
台糖通訊,1996,〈台灣蝴蝶蘭病害之發生及其防治〉。位國慶撰,98(6)。
台糖通訊,1998,〈台省蝴蝶蘭產銷協會假新營總廠成立大會〉。103(10)。
台糖通訊,1999,〈八十九年度專案優惠退離實施要點〉。台糖人事室撰,105(1)。
台糖通訊,1999,〈本公司八十八年度精農事業會議專輯〉。105(8)。
台糖通訊,2000,〈林副總進興視察南靖廠精農事業〉。107(2)。
台糖通訊,2001,〈八十九年度精農事業會議專輯〉。108(10)。
台糖通訊,2002,〈技專校院教師實施研習班至新營廠研習蘭花栽培生產〉。111(3)。
台灣蘭花產銷發展協會,2005,《台灣蘭花產銷資訊手冊》。台灣蘭花產銷發展協會。
王寅東,2004,〈蝴蝶蘭即將成為國際性的日常消費商品—我們有抓住這個大好機會的遠見嗎?〉。原文:陳麗敏譯,出處:蝴蝶蘭期刊2004夏季號。《台糖通訊》113(23):33-35。
李哖,2004,〈台灣的蘭花產業〉。《台灣花卉園藝》200:38。
李哖,2002,〈 蘭花產業及其栽培生理〉。論文發表於「花卉產業現況與未來發展方向研討會」,台灣區花卉發展協會。
林南,2004,《社會資本:關於社會結構與行動的理論》。張磊譯,原文:Social Capital上海:上海人民出版社。
林國明,2003,〈到國家主義之路:路徑依賴與全民健保組織制度的形成〉。《台灣社會學》5:1-71。
吳錦勳,2007,〈荷蘭五年搶下蝴蝶蘭皇冠—快速複製來自精確〉。《商業周刊》1026:111-120。
高承恕,1989,《理性化與資本主義—韋伯與韋伯之外》。台北:聯經。
高宣揚,2002,《布爾迪厄》。台北市:揚智文化。
周雪光,2003,《組織社會學十講》。北京:社會科學文獻。
汪彝定,1991,《走過關鍵年代—汪彝定回憶錄》。商周出版。
國營會,2004,《國營事業委員會九十三年度年報》。台北市:經濟部國營事業委員會。
柯志明,1993,《臺灣都市小型製造業的創業、經營與生產組織--以五分埔成衣製造業為案例的分析》,253頁。臺北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。
紀錦玲,1998,〈新世紀尖端農產品台灣蝴蝶蘭征服世界花市〉。《台糖通訊》103(9)。
陳文輝,2007〈台灣如何成為蝴蝶蘭王國?〉。《科學人》76-82。
陳杏枝,2005,〈都市化、省籍和代間信仰流動之研究〉。《台灣社會學刊》第35卷。
陳東升,2003,《積體網路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。台北市:群學。
顧同慧,2002,〈台糖公司「蝴蝶蘭產銷管理系統」介紹〉,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=8674&ctNode=418。
夏鑄九、劉昭吟,2003,〈越界蘭花:在全球化中重新界定區域與規則〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》49:97。
張晉芬,2001,《台灣公營事業民營化—經濟迷思的批判》。台北市:中研院社研所。
鐘國成,2004,〈台灣花卉產業現況與發展趨勢〉。論文發表於『彰南花卉園區(含高鐵彰化車站)特定區整體發展策略研討會』,主辦單位:彰化縣政府。
劉鳳文、左洪疇,1984,《公營事業的發展》。台北市:聯經。
Brint, Steven and Karabel, Jerome, 1991,” Institutional origins and transformations: the case of American community colleges.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984, Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Translated by Richard Nice, Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S., 1992, “The social structure of competition.” Pp57-91 in Network and Organizational: Structure, Form, and Action, edited by Nitin Norhria and Robert G. Eccles, Harvard Business School Press.
DiMaggio, Paul J., 1991, “Introduction.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W., 1983, “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.”, American Sociological review, Vol. 48.
Dobbin et al. ,1994, “Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets.” In Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, ed. WR Scott, JW Meyer & Associates, pp. 272–300. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Fligstein, N., 1991,”The structural transformation of American industry: an institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919-1979.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fligstein, N.,1997, “Social skill and institutional theory.” American behavioral scientist 40(4):397-405.
Fligstein, N.,2001, “Social skill and theory of fields.” Sociological theory 19(2):105-125.
Girard, Monique and Stark, David, 2002, ”Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new-media projects.” Environment and planning A 34:1927-1949.
Granovetter, M., 1973, “The Strength of Weak Ties”, American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-1380.
Granovetter, M., 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddendness”, American Journal of Sociology 91(3):481-510.
Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R., 1999, “Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm.” Administrative science quarterly 42:716-749.
Hirsch Paul M., 1986, “From ambushes to golden parachutes: corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration.” The American journal of sociology 91(4): 800-837.
Hodson, Randy and Roscigno, Vincent J, 2004, “Organizational success and worker dignity: complementary or contradictory?” The American journal of sociology 110(3):672-708.
Jepperson, R. L., 1991, “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kvist, J., 2003, "Conceptualisation, Configuration, and Categorisation. Diversity, Ideal Types and Fuzzy-Sets in Comparative Welfare State Research’, Paper presented at the Expert Workshop: Systematic Comparative Case Analysis and Policy Analysis: Recent Advances in QCA and Fuzzy Sets and their Application in Policy Analysis, 17th September 2003, Leuven.
Langlois, Richard N., 1986, Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press.
Mahoney, J., 2000, “Path dependence in historical sociology.” Theory and Society 29:507-548.
Mizruchi, Mark S., Stearns, Linda Brewster and Marquis Christopher, 2006, “The Conditional Nature of Embeddendness: A Study of Borrowing by Large U.S. Firms, 1973-1994.” American Sociological Review, 71(2):310-333.
Marx, A., and Dombrecht, J.,2004, " The Organisational Antecedents of Repetitive Strain Injuries: A Systematic Comparative Case Analysis of Assembly, Sorting and Packaging Jobs.", COMPASSS Working Paper.
Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian, 1991, “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moran, P. and Ghoshal, S. (1996), "Value creation by firms." In Keys, J.B., Dosier, L.N. (Eds), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings pp.41-5.
Nahapiet, Janine and Ghoshal, Summantra, 1998, “Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage.” The academy of management review, 23(2).
Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G., 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. ,1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Nooy, W.D., Mrvar, A. and Batagelj, V., 2005, Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Powell, Walter W., 1991, “Expanding the scope of institutional analysis.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, Charles C., 1987, The comparative method. The Regents of the University of California.
Ragin, Charles C., 2000, Fuzzy-set social science. The University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, Charles C., 2004, "From Fuzzy Sets to Crisp Truth Tables" http://www.compasss.org/WPThemes.htm#Approach
Ragin, Charles C., 2004, "Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis" http://www.compasss.org/WPThemes.htm#Approach
Ragin, Charles C., 2007, "Fuzzy Sets: Calibration Versus Measurement".NB: forthcoming in David Collier, Henry Brady, and Janet Box Steffensmeier (eds.), Methodology volume of Oxford Handbooks of Political Science
Scott W. Richard, 1995, Institutions and organization. CA:Sage.
Scott W. Richard, Mayer, John W., and associates, 1994, Institutional environments and organizations—Structural complexity and individualism. CA: SAGE.
Selznick, Philip, 1949, TVA and the grass roosts. Berkeley: University of California.
Selznick, Philip, 1996, “Institutionalism old and new” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:270-8.
Stark, David, 2002, “Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new-media projects.” Environment and planning, 34:1927-1949.
Stark, David, 2001, ”Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: heterarchy in postsocialist firms”, the twenty-first-century firm: changing economic organization in international perspective, Paul DiMaggio, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.
Spender J, 1996,”Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm.” Strategic management journal, 17.
Stokke, O. S., 2004, "Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness". Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young (eds.), Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. pp. 87-119.
Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S., 1998, “Social capital and value creation: the role of intra-firm networks.” Academy of management journal 41(4):464-476.
Tsai, Wenpein, 2001, “Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance .“ Academy of management journal 44(5):996-1004.
Vallas, S. P., 2003, “Why teamwork fails: obstacles to workplace change in four manufacturing plants.” American sociology review 68(2):223-250.
Vis, B., 2006, "States of welfare or states of workfare? A fuzzy-set ideal type analysis of major welfare state restructuring in sixteen advanced capitalist democracies, 1985-2002" NB: forthcoming in Policy & Politics
Western, B., 2001, “Bayesian thinking about macrosociology.” The American journal of sociology 107(2):353
描述 博士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
90254502
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902545021
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 熊瑞梅zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃瀚諄zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang,Han Chunen_US
dc.creator (作者) 黃瀚諄zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Huang,Han Chunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-Sep-2009 13:34:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Sep-2009 13:34:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Sep-2009 13:34:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0902545021en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37401-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 社會學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90254502zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 1985年開始,台糖公司在不與民爭利的原則下拓展蝴蝶蘭事業的發展,延續台灣社會對於蝴蝶蘭的喜好與優勢,進行花卉產業之商業化;產業的萌生源於隸屬於國營事業體制下的正式化組織,基於組織中制度企業家之社會技能動員組織中的成員且策動策略變革,而讓組織固有的制度優勢得以發揮,也克服了體制僵化的瓶頸,而成就了蝴蝶蘭產業於台灣甚至在世界的發展。

本研究透過田野調查以及非線性之質化比較方法,試圖分析台糖開創蝴蝶蘭產業組織新制度的建構模式。研究時間點的劃分,主要以1985年蝴蝶蘭產業小型試種至2001年組織邁入新紀元為止。事實上,在制度環境的架構上,台糖公司發展新興產業的抉擇,隨時間而有階段性的選擇,凸顯了新制度理論在制度環境變遷上歷史性之偶然的觀點(Mizruchi et al. 2006)。事實上,台糖公司落實蝴蝶蘭產業之發展並使之商業化,必須透過三個面向予以說明,首先,制度環境上,組織透過鬆散式結合之運作邏輯化解正式化組織過於僵化的運作模式,並藉此運用正式化組織之資源,結合組織內外之正向的制度環境,發展領先的蝴蝶蘭經營與栽培能力。另外,能夠如此地善用組織資源與變革制度環境,關鍵在於推展產業時,組織任用具有社會技能的制度企業家,不僅聯繫組織內外之菁英,也創造了獨特的經營模式。最後,制度能夠逐漸形成,必須觀察個體行動對於制度環境日常生活實踐的情形,台糖公司在產業開創之時,因其農業企業公司之特質具備優異的農業知識,又基於台灣民間蝴蝶蘭知識資源深厚,經由非正式的接觸,創造了蝴蝶蘭知識,也透過互動的模式擴散知識的分享。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Taiwan Sugar Company developed an Orchid industry in 1985. It turns flower planting into business in order to continue the advantage in Taiwan. The industry originated from State-owned enterprises, which is the formal way of organization. The organization succeeded in developing orchid industry in the world. It helps that there are entrepreneurs who have the social skills to mobilize members and alter strategies in the organization; therefore, the organization can expand these useful institutions and resolve the institutional myth.

The study used field research and qualitative comparative analysis to analyze the structural model of the organizational institution when Taiwan Sugar Company initiated orchid industry from 1985 to 2001. In fact, choosing the produce for this developing industry depends on different stages. It appears that the viewpoint of new institutional theory is that institutional transformation is historically contingent (Mizruchi et al. 2006). Actually, there are three levels that Taiwan Sugar Company uses to develop orchid industry and turn flower planting into business. First, the organization is loosely coupled with formal organization in order to resolve inconsistencies. Moreover, it uses the resources of formal organization and links institutional environment. There was positive feedback about becoming a pioneer in managing and planting in the orchid industry. Second, because there are entrepreneurs who have social skills, the organization can use the advantage of resources and institutional environment. It not only connects the people who own high capability in orchid, but also creates special business model. Finally, the study surveys individual action in the institutional environment, in order to research and understand how to form an institution. When Taiwan Sugar Company created the orchid industry, it was a state-owned enterprise and had rich knowledge in agriculture; in addition, there is rich knowledge about orchids in Taiwanese society. From interaction between the members in the organization and farmers in society, it has created knowledge in orchids and diffused the knowledge in the field.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究緣起 1
第二節 研究目的與問題焦點 9
第三節 本論文章節之安排 11
第二章 文獻探討 15
第一節 建構組織場域之制度環境 18
第二節 組織場域之轉變機制 26
第三節 組織知識創新之行動實踐 33
第三章 研究方法 41
第一節 研究設計 41
第二節 分析架構的主要概念 46
第三節 資料收集與方法 50
第四章 台糖蝴蝶蘭產業場域之制度建構 54
第一節 台糖開創蝴蝶蘭產業的制度機制 57
第二節 台糖公司蝴蝶蘭組織場域『技術制度』的建構 68
第三節 台糖蝴蝶蘭運作和正式化組織的鬆散結合機制 78
第四節 結論 99
第五章 台糖蝴蝶蘭產業場域制度轉變的機制 105
第一節 組織場域制度轉變機制的分析方法 107
第二節 台糖公司蝴蝶蘭產業場域的制度轉變機制 123
第三節 結論 141
第六章 台糖蝴蝶蘭產業的知識創新與擴散 142
第一節 分析架構與分析方法 143
第二節 蝴蝶蘭產業專業社群的動態知識網絡 145
第三節 蝴蝶蘭產業之非正式知識創新網絡 169
第四節 蝴蝶蘭產業知識擴散 185
第五節 結論 193
第七章 結論 195
第一節 研究發現與討論 195
第二節 台糖開創蝴蝶蘭產業制度化之理論反省 207
第三節 研究限制與未來研究之建議 214
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 44422 bytes-
dc.format.extent 393196 bytes-
dc.format.extent 124097 bytes-
dc.format.extent 128626 bytes-
dc.format.extent 695699 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1622386 bytes-
dc.format.extent 510646 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1524954 bytes-
dc.format.extent 2343533 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1140524 bytes-
dc.format.extent 237200 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1139769 bytes-
dc.format.extent 104766 bytes-
dc.format.extent 634814 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902545021en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新制度理論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識擴散zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 質化比較分析法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) QCAzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網絡分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 蝴蝶蘭產業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 台糖zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 台糖公司zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 台糖開創蝴蝶蘭產業組織新制度分析zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華盆花發展協會,1999,《台灣蝴蝶蘭運銷通路調查報告》。台北:中華盆花發展協會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華盆花發展協會,2003,《台灣蝴蝶蘭產銷調查報告》。台北:中華盆花發展協會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖公司,1997,《台糖五十年》。台北:台灣糖業股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖公司,2006,《台糖六十週年慶紀念專刊—台灣糖業之演進與再生》。台南:台灣糖業股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1986,〈創新求變迎接挑戰—台糖四十年緒言〉。袁樹聲撰,78(13)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1990,〈本公司參加名古屋國際蘭展剪影〉,營業處撰。86(11)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1993,〈花卉拓銷另一章—八十二年度台灣區花卉業者赴日拓銷訪問報告〉,陳明言撰,92(4)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1993,〈八十二年度農務會議〉。93(5)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1994,〈第七屆國際花展剪影〉,農務處撰。94(10)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1995,〈台糖闖出蝴蝶蘭字號〉,董智森撰。96(1)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1995,〈本公司積極輔導蔗農轉作蝴蝶蘭〉。97(1)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1996,〈台灣蝴蝶蘭病害之發生及其防治〉。位國慶撰,98(6)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1998,〈台省蝴蝶蘭產銷協會假新營總廠成立大會〉。103(10)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1999,〈八十九年度專案優惠退離實施要點〉。台糖人事室撰,105(1)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,1999,〈本公司八十八年度精農事業會議專輯〉。105(8)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,2000,〈林副總進興視察南靖廠精農事業〉。107(2)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,2001,〈八十九年度精農事業會議專輯〉。108(10)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台糖通訊,2002,〈技專校院教師實施研習班至新營廠研習蘭花栽培生產〉。111(3)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台灣蘭花產銷發展協會,2005,《台灣蘭花產銷資訊手冊》。台灣蘭花產銷發展協會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王寅東,2004,〈蝴蝶蘭即將成為國際性的日常消費商品—我們有抓住這個大好機會的遠見嗎?〉。原文:陳麗敏譯,出處:蝴蝶蘭期刊2004夏季號。《台糖通訊》113(23):33-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李哖,2004,〈台灣的蘭花產業〉。《台灣花卉園藝》200:38。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李哖,2002,〈 蘭花產業及其栽培生理〉。論文發表於「花卉產業現況與未來發展方向研討會」,台灣區花卉發展協會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林南,2004,《社會資本:關於社會結構與行動的理論》。張磊譯,原文:Social Capital上海:上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林國明,2003,〈到國家主義之路:路徑依賴與全民健保組織制度的形成〉。《台灣社會學》5:1-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳錦勳,2007,〈荷蘭五年搶下蝴蝶蘭皇冠—快速複製來自精確〉。《商業周刊》1026:111-120。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高承恕,1989,《理性化與資本主義—韋伯與韋伯之外》。台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高宣揚,2002,《布爾迪厄》。台北市:揚智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周雪光,2003,《組織社會學十講》。北京:社會科學文獻。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 汪彝定,1991,《走過關鍵年代—汪彝定回憶錄》。商周出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 國營會,2004,《國營事業委員會九十三年度年報》。台北市:經濟部國營事業委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 柯志明,1993,《臺灣都市小型製造業的創業、經營與生產組織--以五分埔成衣製造業為案例的分析》,253頁。臺北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 紀錦玲,1998,〈新世紀尖端農產品台灣蝴蝶蘭征服世界花市〉。《台糖通訊》103(9)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳文輝,2007〈台灣如何成為蝴蝶蘭王國?〉。《科學人》76-82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳杏枝,2005,〈都市化、省籍和代間信仰流動之研究〉。《台灣社會學刊》第35卷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳東升,2003,《積體網路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。台北市:群學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顧同慧,2002,〈台糖公司「蝴蝶蘭產銷管理系統」介紹〉,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=8674&ctNode=418。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏鑄九、劉昭吟,2003,〈越界蘭花:在全球化中重新界定區域與規則〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》49:97。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張晉芬,2001,《台灣公營事業民營化—經濟迷思的批判》。台北市:中研院社研所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鐘國成,2004,〈台灣花卉產業現況與發展趨勢〉。論文發表於『彰南花卉園區(含高鐵彰化車站)特定區整體發展策略研討會』,主辦單位:彰化縣政府。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉鳳文、左洪疇,1984,《公營事業的發展》。台北市:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brint, Steven and Karabel, Jerome, 1991,” Institutional origins and transformations: the case of American community colleges.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984, Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Translated by Richard Nice, Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burt, R. S., 1992, “The social structure of competition.” Pp57-91 in Network and Organizational: Structure, Form, and Action, edited by Nitin Norhria and Robert G. Eccles, Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DiMaggio, Paul J., 1991, “Introduction.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W., 1983, “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.”, American Sociological review, Vol. 48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dobbin et al. ,1994, “Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets.” In Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, ed. WR Scott, JW Meyer & Associates, pp. 272–300. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fligstein, N., 1991,”The structural transformation of American industry: an institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919-1979.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fligstein, N.,1997, “Social skill and institutional theory.” American behavioral scientist 40(4):397-405.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fligstein, N.,2001, “Social skill and theory of fields.” Sociological theory 19(2):105-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Girard, Monique and Stark, David, 2002, ”Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new-media projects.” Environment and planning A 34:1927-1949.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Granovetter, M., 1973, “The Strength of Weak Ties”, American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-1380.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Granovetter, M., 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddendness”, American Journal of Sociology 91(3):481-510.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R., 1999, “Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm.” Administrative science quarterly 42:716-749.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hirsch Paul M., 1986, “From ambushes to golden parachutes: corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration.” The American journal of sociology 91(4): 800-837.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hodson, Randy and Roscigno, Vincent J, 2004, “Organizational success and worker dignity: complementary or contradictory?” The American journal of sociology 110(3):672-708.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jepperson, R. L., 1991, “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kvist, J., 2003, "Conceptualisation, Configuration, and Categorisation. Diversity, Ideal Types and Fuzzy-Sets in Comparative Welfare State Research’, Paper presented at the Expert Workshop: Systematic Comparative Case Analysis and Policy Analysis: Recent Advances in QCA and Fuzzy Sets and their Application in Policy Analysis, 17th September 2003, Leuven.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Langlois, Richard N., 1986, Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mahoney, J., 2000, “Path dependence in historical sociology.” Theory and Society 29:507-548.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mizruchi, Mark S., Stearns, Linda Brewster and Marquis Christopher, 2006, “The Conditional Nature of Embeddendness: A Study of Borrowing by Large U.S. Firms, 1973-1994.” American Sociological Review, 71(2):310-333.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marx, A., and Dombrecht, J.,2004, " The Organisational Antecedents of Repetitive Strain Injuries: A Systematic Comparative Case Analysis of Assembly, Sorting and Packaging Jobs.", COMPASSS Working Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian, 1991, “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moran, P. and Ghoshal, S. (1996), "Value creation by firms." In Keys, J.B., Dosier, L.N. (Eds), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings pp.41-5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nahapiet, Janine and Ghoshal, Summantra, 1998, “Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage.” The academy of management review, 23(2).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G., 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. ,1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nooy, W.D., Mrvar, A. and Batagelj, V., 2005, Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Powell, Walter W., 1991, “Expanding the scope of institutional analysis.” In the new institutionalism in organization analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ragin, Charles C., 1987, The comparative method. The Regents of the University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ragin, Charles C., 2000, Fuzzy-set social science. The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ragin, Charles C., 2004, "From Fuzzy Sets to Crisp Truth Tables" http://www.compasss.org/WPThemes.htm#Approachzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ragin, Charles C., 2004, "Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis" http://www.compasss.org/WPThemes.htm#Approachzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ragin, Charles C., 2007, "Fuzzy Sets: Calibration Versus Measurement".NB: forthcoming in David Collier, Henry Brady, and Janet Box Steffensmeier (eds.), Methodology volume of Oxford Handbooks of Political Sciencezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scott W. Richard, 1995, Institutions and organization. CA:Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scott W. Richard, Mayer, John W., and associates, 1994, Institutional environments and organizations—Structural complexity and individualism. CA: SAGE.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Selznick, Philip, 1949, TVA and the grass roosts. Berkeley: University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Selznick, Philip, 1996, “Institutionalism old and new” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:270-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stark, David, 2002, “Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new-media projects.” Environment and planning, 34:1927-1949.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stark, David, 2001, ”Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: heterarchy in postsocialist firms”, the twenty-first-century firm: changing economic organization in international perspective, Paul DiMaggio, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spender J, 1996,”Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm.” Strategic management journal, 17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stokke, O. S., 2004, "Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness". Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young (eds.), Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. pp. 87-119.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S., 1998, “Social capital and value creation: the role of intra-firm networks.” Academy of management journal 41(4):464-476.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsai, Wenpein, 2001, “Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance .“ Academy of management journal 44(5):996-1004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vallas, S. P., 2003, “Why teamwork fails: obstacles to workplace change in four manufacturing plants.” American sociology review 68(2):223-250.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vis, B., 2006, "States of welfare or states of workfare? A fuzzy-set ideal type analysis of major welfare state restructuring in sixteen advanced capitalist democracies, 1985-2002" NB: forthcoming in Policy & Politicszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Western, B., 2001, “Bayesian thinking about macrosociology.” The American journal of sociology 107(2):353zh_TW