| dc.contributor.advisor | 李文福 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 陳宥翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳宥翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 13:40:28 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 13:40:28 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 13:40:28 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095258033 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37410 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 經濟研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95258033 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 工具機不僅在機械產業占有一席之地，在製造業更是扮演舉足輕重的角色，生活周遭所使用的物品，許多都是由工具機所製造。工具機產業的核心技術，仰賴資深員工的經驗傳承，因此教育訓練是工具機廠商營運的流程中重要的一環。傳統DEA 要求所有的投入、產出資料必須為量化的數據，然而現實生活中有很多重要的變數難以量化，Likert 量表發明後，學者們大量使用Likert 量表量化這些變數，但是Likert 量表尺度的公平性是許多學者質疑的重點。模糊DEA 透過模糊理論，改善Likert 量表尺度公平性的問題，因此本研究使用模糊DEA 進行工具機廠商教育訓練績效的分析，並比較Likert 量表尺度下的DEA 與模糊DEA 實證結果的不同，研究對象為民國96 年的台灣地區85 間工具機廠商。 幾項重要的實證分析結果如下：1. 整體技術效率差者，多為訓練積極的廠商。2. 部分規模效率差的廠商，純技術效率表現尚在中等水平，表示這些廠商只是因為訓練較為積極，使得投入在生產規模遞減的水準。3. 工具機產業的教育訓練普遍有浪費的現象，顯示只要投入少許資源即可達到相當的成效，若要突破某個瓶頸，就要增加相當多的資源。4. 整體而言使用Likert 量表尺度或是模糊DEA 的結果沒有顯著差異，但是對於效率較佳的廠商來說，模糊DEA 具有較高的鑑別力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The machine tool plays an important role in not only machinery industry but alsothe whole manufacturing industry. Most of goods around us are made by the machinetool. The core technologies hold by experienced employees depends on training topass down. Therefore, training is an essential process in machine tool factories. Intraditional DEA, all inputs and outputs need to be numeric data. But in reality, thereare many key variables are hard to be measured in numeric. After Likert scale beinginvented, the scholars widely use the scale to evaluate these key variables. However,there is criticism of the equity in Likert scale. Fuzzy DEA corrects this disadvantageof Likert scale with fuzzy theory. As a result, this study evaluates the trainingefficiency of 85 Taiwanese machine tool manufacturers in 2007 with fuzzy DEA andcomparers the result between fuzzy DEA and the method of Likert scale. Some important conclusions are shown as follow:1. Most of the inefficient DMUs are active about training.2. Although some DMUs are bad in scale efficiency, they are fair in pure technicalefficiency. It explains that these DMUs just input at decrease return to scale(DRTS) level.3. Generally, there is waste of training in this industry. The empirical result tells usthey can obtain certain effects with little input. If they want to break through somebottle neck of training effects, they have to input tremendous resources.4. As a whole, there is no difference between the result of fuzzy DEA and themethod of Likert scale. However, there is better discrimination of efficient DMUsin fuzzy DEA. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章緒論……………………………………………………… 1 第一節：研究背景…………………………………………1 第二節：研究動機…………………………………………6 第三節：研究範圍…………………………………………6第二章文獻回顧…………………………………………………8 第一節：教育訓練成果評估架構…………………………8 第二節：教育訓練成果評估指標…………………………12第三章研究方法……………………………………………… 20 第一節：生產理論…………………………………………20 第二節：傳統資料包絡分析法……………………………21 第三節：模糊資料包絡分析法……………………………24 第四節：實證分析架構……………………………………28第四章實證分析……………………………………………… 33 第一節：廠商教育訓練概況………………………………33 第二節：模糊資料包絡分析研究…………………………43 第三節：模糊數與精確數於資料包絡分析之比較………55第五章結論與建議…………………………………………… 60 第一節：實證結論…………………………………………60 第二節：研究改善建議……………………………………64參考文獻……………………………………………………………… 66附錄…………………………………………………………………… 69附件一：研究問卷…………………………………………………… 74附件二：α水準為0、0.3、0.7、1 時之模糊整體技術效率值……78附件三：α水準為0、0.3、0.7、1 時之模糊純技術效率值………81附件四：α水準為0、0.3、0.7、1 時之模糊規模效率值…………84附件五：廠商代號對照表……………………………………………87附件六：各廠商總差額與射線、非射線差額表……………………95 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 166893 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 145221 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 120751 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 64265 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 132306 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 216992 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 270788 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 327842 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 478196 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 187531 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 160654 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 208434 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 230414 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 199676 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 292719 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 260620 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095258033 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 工具機 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 教育訓練 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 模糊DEA | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | machine tool | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | training | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | fuzzy DEA | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 台灣工具機廠商教育訓練績效分析-模糊資料包絡分析法之應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心兩岸工具機產業專題研究. 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王為勤「2003 企業教育訓練大調查」管理雜誌. 臺北市: 哈佛企業管理顧問 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 股份有限公司, 2003, 68~72. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局「九十六年度協助企業人力資源提升個別型計 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 畫」2007. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 阮佩芬「技職教育與建教合作訓練探討」網路社會學通訊, 2007, 67. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張紹勳硏究方法. 台中市: 滄海, 1990. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許駿煒「高科技產業員工教育訓練成效評估之個案研究」國立台北科技大學碩 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 士論文, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳世璋「當前產業人力政策」政治大學演講資料, 2007. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉仁傑「Business Architecture 與兩岸企業競合策略」東海大學演講資 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 料, 2003. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡新源. 「高值化機械兆元產業發展策略」機械資訊, 2008, 611. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Peters, Thomas J. and Waterman, Robert H. 追求卓越: 美國傑出企 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 業成功的祕訣.台北市: 天下文化, 1993. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Banker, R.D.; Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. "Some Models for | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Envelopment Analysis." Management Science, 1984, 30, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | pp. 1078~92. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brinkerhoff, Robert O. "Training Impact Evaluation That | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Senior Managers Believe and Use: The Success Case | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Method," ASTD 2007 International Conference and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Exposotion. 2007. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bushnell, David S. "Input, Process, Output: A Model for | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Evaluating Training." Training & Development Journal, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990, 44, pp. 41~43. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. "Measuring the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Efficiency of Decision Making Units." European Journal of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Operational Research, 1978, 2, pp. 429~44. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chen, Chie B. and Klein, Cerry M. "A Simple Approach to | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ranking a Group of Aggregated Fuzzy Utilities." IEEE | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 1997, 27, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | pp. 26~35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chen, Shu-Jen. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making : | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Farrell, M.J. "The Measurement of Productivity Efficiency." | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1957, 120, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | pp. 253~90. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gardner Publications, Inc. "The 2008 World Machine-Tool | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Output and Consumption Survey." 2008. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kao, C. and Liu, S. T. "Fuzzy Efficiency Measures in Data | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Envelopment Analysis." Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000a, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 113, pp. 427~37. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ____. "Data Envelopment Analysis with missing data: An | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Application to University Libraries in Taiwan." Journal | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of the Operational Research Society, 2000b, 51, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | pp.897~905. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kirkpatrick, Donald L. "Technique for Evaluating Training | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Programs." Training & Development Journal, 1959, 13(11), | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | pp. 3~9. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Koopmans, T.C. An Analysis of Production as an Efficient | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Combination of Activities. New York: Wiley, 1951. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nadler, Leonard. Every Manager`s Guide to Human Resource | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ouyang, Li S. and Lee, Hwey C. "Fuzzy Efficiency in the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Life Insurance Industry in Taiwan," 2008 Asia-Pacific | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Productivity Conference. 2008. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shelton, Sandra and Alliger, George. "Who`s Afraid of Level | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4 Evaluation?" Training & Development Journal, 1993, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 47(6), pp. 43~46. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stufflebeam, Daniel L. and Shinkfield, Anthony J. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | "Systematic Evaluation : A Self-Instructional Guide to | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Theory and Practice." Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1985. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zadeh, L. A. "Fuzzy Sets." Information and Control, 1965, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8, pp. 338~53. | zh_TW |
