dc.contributor.advisor | 李國雄 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lee,Kuo-hsiung | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 李振威 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lee,Cheng-Wuei | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 李振威 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Lee,Cheng-Wuei | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 13:57:39 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 13:57:39 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 13:57:39 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0094925008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37476 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS) | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 94925008 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文旨在探討二十一世紀,美國面臨中國在東亞的經營,如何維持其在東亞的霸權所作的努力。冷戰結束後,美國在國際社會成為碩果僅存的霸權。藉此優勢,美國得以遂其意志,有些甚至非其能力所及。雖然美國可確定是當今唯一的霸權,但中國挾其經濟快速起飛之利,不但在全球各地揮舞其影響力,更試圖擴大外交上的戰果。此外,中國軍事成長之快速,從軍事現代化到太空競賽,足以顯示中國將改變東亞的政治環境及地區安全。因此,中國的崛起對美國霸權,尤其在東亞,被視為一潛在的威脅。美國要如何鞏固其在東亞的霸權領導地位,自然為當前極為迫切的議題。由研究發現,美國所作的努力倍極艱辛、複雜但結果是成功的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | After the end of the Cold War in 1991, the United States poses a unique position in the international system. As hegemony, the U.S. has the greatest stake in the existing order. Yet it also takes advantage of its position as the most powerful nation in the world to bend that order to its will and even act outside the limits of the system. It seems to confirm American hegemony, with the U.S. left as the only superpower. With its soaring rise, however, China is looming as a potential challenger to the U.S. hegemony in East Asia. China not only wields radically increasing commercial clout in all regions of the globe, but also tries to achieve diplomatic advantage with respect to the United States. Further, Beijing’s rapid, deep, and wide-ranging modernization in military capabilities ranging from diesel submarines to micro-satellites and the launching of ballistic missile destroying one of its own orbiting weather satellites will enable China to increasingly dominate the East Asian littoral. Therefore, how to maintain American hegemony especially in East Asia has become a pressing issue for the United States. The thesis uses in-depth studies of critical literature and case study to analyze the wrestle between U.S. and China in East Asian Area. From the research one can find that the effort the U.S. has made to maintain its hegemonic leadership in East Asia is hard but successful. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Authorized Page………………………………………………………………………iiiAuthorized for Online Publication……………………………………………………ivAcknowledgement……………………………………………………………………..vAbstract……………………………………………………………………………….viList of Tables…………………………………………………………………………vii1 Introduction…………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Background of the Research…………………………………………………..1 1.2 Motivation of the Research……………………………………………………41.3 Research Purpose and Questions………………………………………………61.4 Literature Review……………………………………………………………...81.5 Theoretical Framework………………………………………………………131.6 Research Method……………………………………………………………..161.7 Structure of the Thesis………………………………………………………..172 The Changing U.S. Hegemony in East Asia…………………………19 2.1 The Emergence of American Hegemony…………………………………….20 2.1.1 American-West European Component…………………………………22 2.1.2 American-East Asian Component……………………………………...27 2.2 How Has the US Become Hegemonic in East Asia? ………………………...30 2.2.1 Promotion of Economic Liberalism……………………………………32 2.2.2 Washington Consensus…………………………………………………33 2.2.3 Benign Hegemony……………………………………………………...35 2.3 Factors Contributing to the Changing Nature of American Hegemony……...372.3.1 Setback in Vietnam War………………………………………………..372.3.2 End of Cold War………………………………………………………..402.3.3 East Asian Multilateralism……………………………………………..412.3.4 American Unilateralist…………………………………………………442.3.5 American Soft Power…………………………………………………..463 The Rise of China in East Asia………………………………………..49 3.1 The Multi-facet Nature of the Rise of China…………………………………49 3.1.1 Philosophy of each Generation…………………………………………50 3.1.2 Political Reform………………………………………………………..533.1.3 Military Reform………………………………………………………...56 3.1.4 Rise of China’s Soft Power…………………………………………….59 3.2 China’s New Diplomacy in the Context of the US Hegemony………………65 3.2.1 Balancing……………………………………………………………….67 3.2.2 Accommodation………………………………………………………..68 3.2.3 Challenging…………………………………………………………….693.3 China’s Basic Diplomatic Strategies to East Asian Security…………………71 3.3.1 Searching for Balance among the Major Power………………………..71 3.3.2 Stabilizing Relations with Neighboring States…………………………72 3.3.3 Securing the Passage in South China Seas……………………………..744 The Maintenance of American Hegemonic Leadership in East Asia…75 4.1 How America Maintains Its Hegemonic Leadership in East Asia…………...764.1.1 American East Asian Policies in the Post-Cold War Era………………764.1.2 American Military Presence in East Asia………………………………774.1.3 American Economic Presence in East Asia…………………………….814.2 EAS, APEC, and US…………………………………………………………83 4.2.1 American Attitude toward EAS………………………………………...84 4.2.2 Role of APEC…………………………………………………………..86 4.2.3 How the APEC is used by America to Response toward EAS…………884.3 American East Asian Security Defense Arrangement………………………..894.3.1 US-Japan Alliance……………………………………………………...904.3.2 US-Korea Alliance……………………………………………………..93 4.3.3 US-Philippines Alliance……………………………………………….944.4 Taiwan Strait Issue…………………………………………………………..96 4.4.1 American Position in the Taiwan Strait Issue………………………….97 4.4.2 The Third Taiwan Strait Crisis…………………………………………984.5 South China Sea Issue………………………………………………………1014.5.1 Background…………………………………………………………...1014.5.2 American Foreign Policy toward the South China Sea……………….1024.5.3 Implications…………………………………………………………...1044.6 Korean Peninsula Issue—Special Case……………………………………..106 4.6.1 Background…………………………………………………………...1064.6.2 American Intervention………………………………………………...1074.6.3 China’s Role…………………………………………………………..1094.6.4 Implications…………………………………………………………...1105 Conclusion…………………………………………………………...112Bibliography…………………………………………………………...122 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 39993 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 12943 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 13180 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 12342 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 16213 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 90359 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 121306 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 137386 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 153172 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 44373 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 43251 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094925008 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 霸權穩定論 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 東亞 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 中國 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 美國霸權 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | hegemonic stability theory | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | East Asia | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | China | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | American hegemony | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 美國東亞霸權與中國 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | American Hegemony and China in East Asia | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【1】 Agnew, J., Hegemony: the New Shape of Global Power, Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press, 2005. p.190, p.219, p.221, pp.223-224, p.225. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【2】 Brendan, T., “US-China relations after 11 September: a long engagement or marriage of convenience?” Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol.59, No.2, June 2005, p182. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【3】 Brookes, Peter T.R., China’s Influence in the Western Hemisphere, a speech delivered at United States House of Representatives, April 6, 2005. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【4】 Chen Shaohua, “Fighting Poverty: Findings and Lessons from China’s Success,” World Bank, September 7, 2005. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【5】 Cheng, J., “China and the Korean situation: The Challenge of Pyongyang’s Brinkmanship”, East Asia: An International Quarterly, Vol.20, No.4, Winter 2003, p.73. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【6】 Cheow, E., “China’s Rising Soft Power in Southeast Asia,” PACNET, A19, May 3, 2004. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【7】 Cheung, G..C.K., Market Liberalism, American Foreign Policy toward China, New Brunswick and London, Transaction Publishers, 1998 p.134. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【8】 Cossa, R., “Chance for New US-China Strategic Tie”, Japan Times. October 20, 2001. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【9】 Dixon, W., “Democracy and Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict,” American Political Science Review 88, 1994, pp.14-32. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【10】 Dorn, J. A., “U.S.-China Relations in the Wake of CNOOC,” Policy Analysis, November 2, 2005, p.3, p.8. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【11】 Foot, R., “Human Rights and. Counter-terrorism in America`s Asia Policy, Adelphi Paper, 363, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, p.61. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【12】 Friedberg, A. L., “11 September and the Future of Sino-American Relations,” Survival, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2002, p.45. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【13】 Fukuyama, F., The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press, 1992, p.1. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【14】 Gang, F., “China Is a Private-Sector Economy,” BusinessWeek, August 22, 2005. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【15】 Gilpin, R., War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, p.33. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【16】 ------, The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987, p.75. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【17】 Harkavy, R. E., “Images of the coming international system”, Orbis, Vol. 41. No.4, Fall, 1997, pp.569-590. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【18】 Hennock, M., “China’s economic gatekeeper steps down,” BBC News, November 7, 2002. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【19】 Huntington, S. P., “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 3, Summer 1993, pp. 22-49. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【20】 ------, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【21】 Hyun-jin, “Skepticism Lingers over History Issue: Beijing Pledges not to Stake Claim to Goguryeo in History Textbooks”, The Korea Herald, August 25, 2004. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【22】 Ikenberry, G.. J., “American hegemony and East order,” Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 58, No. 3, September 2004, P.353. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【23】 International Crisis Group, “China and Taiwan Uneasy Détente,” Asia Briefing, No. 42. Brussels: International Crisis Group, September 21. 2005. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【24】 Kahler, M., “Legalization as a strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case”, International Organization, 2000, 54(3) pp. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【25】 Kenndy, P., The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000, New York: Random House, 1987, p.458. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【26】 Keohane, R. O., and Joseph S. Nye Jr., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, Little, Brown, 1997, p.44. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【27】 Kerr, D., “The Sino-Russian Partnership and U.S. Policy Toward North Korea: From Hegemony to Concert in Northeast Asia”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 49, 2005, p.426. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【28】 Kim, S.S., “China and North Korea in a Changing World” in Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, American Political Science Review, 2003, pp.14-15. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【29】 Kuik, C.C., “Multilateralism in China’s ASEAN Policy: Its Evolution, Characteristics, and Aspiration,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 27, No.1, 2005, p.103. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【30】 Kurlantzick, J., “China’s Charm: Implications of Chinese Soft Power,” Policy Brief, June 2006, p.1. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【31】 ------, Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007, p.1, p.3, p.6. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【32】 Lampton, D., “The Faces of Chinese Power,” Foreign Affairs, January/February 2007, pp.116-118, p.123-4, p.126. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【33】 Lee, L. T., “Political Reforms in Post-Deng China”, paper presented at the conference on Asian Perspectives on the Challenge of China, 7-8 March 2000, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Washington, D.C., USA. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【34】 Lee, P., “From Competitor to Stakeholder: Shifting of US Strategic Orientation toward China and Taiwan Issue -- Analyzing from the perspective of Constructivism,” Taiwan Research Quarterly, Vol.1, 2006, p.1. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【35】 Lemke, D., Regions of War and Peace, New York: Cambridge. University Press, 2002, pp.21-22. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【36】 Liu, J., “Ershi yi shiji ershi sanshi niandai Zhongguo jueqi ji waijiao zhanlue xueze,” Zhanlue yu guanli, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1994, p.119. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【37】 Mearsheimer, J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, W. W. Norton & Company, October 2001, p.402. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【38】 Medeiros, E. S., & Fravel M. Taylor, “China’s New Diplomacy”, Foreign Affairs, November/ December 2003, pp.1-4. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【39】 Mufson, S., “China Tells US It Will Share Information”, Washington Post, September 22, 2001, A30. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【40】 Ni Shixiong, Theory of Western International Relations, Shang Hai, Fu Dan University Press, 2001, pp. 298-299. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【41】 Nye, J. S., Jr., “Soft Power,” Foreign Policy, Vol. 80, Autumn 1990, pp.153-171. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【42】 ------, “The Case for Deep Engagement,” Foreign Affairs, July/August, 1995, pp.90-102. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【43】 ------, “Propaganda Isn’t the Way: Soft Power,” The International Herald Tribune, January 10, 2003. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【44】 ------, “The Decline of America`s Soft Power”, Foreign Affairs, May/June 2004. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【45】 ------, “The Rise of China’s Soft Power” The Wall Street Journal Asia, December 29, 2005. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【46】 Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler Jacek, The War Ledger, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980, pp.13-63. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【47】 Organski, A. F. K., World Politics, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1958, p.100-103, p.325. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【48】 Perlez, J., “China Races to Replace U.S. as Economic Power in Asia,” New York Times, June 28, 2002. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【49】 Pollack, J.D., “The United States, North Korea, and the End of the Agreed Framework”, Naval War College Review, Summer, Vol. VI, No.23, September 21, 2003, p.21, p.36. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【50】 Rapkin, C., & Robert Thompson, “Power Transition, Challenge, and the (Re)Emergence of China”, International Interactions, April 29. 2003. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【51】 Ross, R. S., “The Geography of the Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-first Century” International Security, Vol. 23, Issue 4, Spring 1999, pp.85-86. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【52】 ------, “A Realist Policy for Managing US-China Competition,” Policy Analysis Brief, November 2005, p.2. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【53】 Roy D., “China and the War on Terrorism,” Orbits, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2002, p.513, p.521. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【54】 ------, “China’s Reaction to American Predominance,” Survival, Vol. 45, No.3, Autumn 2003, p.59-74. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【55】 Saunders, P. C., “Sino-U.S. Relations against the Backdrop of East-Asia Cooperation: Coordinatig Different Interests,” Network of East Asian Think-Tanks, February 21, 2006. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【56】 Schweller, R., “Managing the Rise of Great Powers: History and Theory,” Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert Ross (eds), Engaging China: Managing a Rising Power, Routledge, 1999, p.19. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【57】 Shambaugh, D., “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order”, International Security, Vol.29, No. 3, 2004, pp.64-99. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【58】 Shen, J., “Weihu Dongbei Ya Anquan de Dangwuzhiji-Zhiye Chao He Wenti Shang de Weixian Boyi” [The matter of immediate urgency in defending Northeast Asian security: stopping the dangerous games over the Korean Nuclear Problem], Shijie Jingli yu Zhengzhi, No. 9, 2003, p.58. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【59】 Strange, S., “The Future of the American Empire”, in Richard Little and Michael Smith, eds., Perspectives on World Politics, 2d. ed., London: Routledge, 1991, pp.56-57. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【60】 Sutter, R. G.., “China’s Rise: Implications for US Leadership in Asia,” East-West Center Washington, March 14, 2006, p.62. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【61】 Swain, M.D., &Tellis Ashleys, Interpreting China’s Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future, Santa Monica, CA:RAND, 2000, p.179. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【62】 Tammen, R.L., Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century, Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press. 2000. pp.157-158 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【63】 Thomas, N., “China’s Role in Asia Regionalism: Developing Norms and Institutions,” workshop on Governance and Regionalism in Asia, at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, December 8, 2005. p.9-11, p.20. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【64】 Tsunekawa, J., “Post-9/11 Power Politics among the US, China, and Russia-Unilateralism and Central and Southeast Asia,” East Asian Strategic Review, 2007, p.59. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【65】 Tuazon, B., “Current US Hegemony In Asia Pacific” Peace Researcher, December 28, 2003. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【66】 Vatikiots, M., Ben Dolven, & David Murphy, “Terror Throws Us Together, For Now”, Far Eastern Economic Review, November 1, 2001, p.36-40. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【67】 Vogel, E. F., The Four Little Dragons: The Spread of Industrialization in East Asia, Harvard University Press, November 25, 2006, p.1. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【68】 Wallerstein, I., The Decline of American Power: The U.S. in a Chaotic World, New York: New Press, 2003, p.308. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【69】 Yang I-bin, “Confucian Culture and China’s soft power: an exploration of Confucius Institutes,” Prospect & Exploration, 2007, Vol.5, No.7, p.30, p.33, pp.37-38. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【70】 Zhang, X., & Eugene Brown, “Policies towards North Korea: a time for new thinking”, Journal of Contemporary China, September, 25, 2001, p.537. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【71】 Zhu Zhiqun, US-China Relations in the 21st Century: Power Transition and Peace, Routledge, 2006, p.15, p.133. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 【72】 Zweig, D., “Resource Diplomacy Under Hegemony: The Sources of Sino- American Competition in the 21st Century?” Conference on The Rise of China and Its Implications for Asia-Pacific, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 25-26 August, 2006, p.3. | zh_TW |