dc.contributor.advisor | 吳定 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林淑端 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 林淑端 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2003 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 15:05:48 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 15:05:48 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 15:05:48 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0089921031 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34772 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 行政管理碩士學程 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 89921031 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 92 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 大學以推動學術研究為主要目的,惟有尊重學術自由、強調學校自主,依據教師專業能力、成就及績效,規劃設計合理的彈性待遇制度,才能提昇高等教育品質。本研究旨在瞭解我國國立大學教師對待遇制度現況問題的看法,及對教師對彈性待遇改進方向的意見,藉以提出具體建議,作為研議改進國立大學教師待遇制度的參考。 本研究首先對大學教師待遇制度的理論和實務進行文獻探討,再進行深度訪談,依據文獻探討與深度訪談意見,作為建立研究架構與調查問卷之依據,問卷調查的對象為全國48所國立大學專任教師,以分層取樣抽取1,150人,回收有效樣本913人,研究工具為自編之「國立大學教師待遇制度改進之研究」問卷。使用的統計方法包括描述性統計分析及單因子變異數分析等。 綜合文獻探討、深度訪談及問卷調查結果,本研究主要發現如下:一、大多數國立大學教師對待遇制度相當瞭解且感到滿意。絕大多數教師同意目前的待遇水準足以維持基本生活;但多數教師認為目前的待遇水準無法激發教學研究服務績效。二、多數國立大學教師認為目前待遇制度之本薪薪級結構、年終工作獎金的支給方式尚稱適當;但大多數教師認為各職級之學術研究費應再予以分級。三、絕大多數國立大學教師贊同教師待遇制度設計應公教分途。四、國立大學教師待遇應分為固定待遇和彈性待遇。固定待遇應有一致標準;彈性待遇應依學校、職務、專長領域、績效而有不同標準。五、國立大學教師彈性待遇具體措施,包括新進教師彈性待遇措施及現職教師彈性待遇措施。六、規劃教師彈性待遇制度,應與國立大學法人化方向一併考量,並同時改進大學校務基金制度相關配套措施。七、絕大多數國立大學教師贊同大學應有彈性待遇之自主決定權。而大多數教師亦贊同彈性待遇經費應由校務基金自籌款支應。八、國立大學教師彈性待遇設計應優先考量教師個人教學研究服務績效因素,其次為環境因素和學校整體績效因素。九、國立大學教師績效評量應由教育部訂定原則,並授權各校訂定評量指標與權重。教師年度績效評量之作業程序應採三級三審制。十、為獎優汰劣,國立大學教師彈性待遇制度應有淘汰機制配合。十一、對教師待遇制度現況的意見,綜合大學教師的同意程度低於其他類型學校教師;運動休閒及人文社會科學領域教師的同意程度高於其他各專長領域教師。不同職級教師對待遇制度現況的同意程度有顯著差異,職級愈高,同意程度則愈低。任教年資愈長的教師,對待遇制度愈瞭解,也愈感到滿意。十二、對教師彈性待遇設計應考量環境及學校整體績效因素的意見,藝術校院和綜合大學教師的贊同程度高於其他類型學校的教師;人文社會科學領域教師的贊同程度低於其他各專長領域的教師。不同職務教師的贊同程度有顯著差異,職級愈高,贊同程度也愈高。依據上述研究發現提出下列具體建議:一、儘速確立公教分途之教師待遇制度發展方向。二、國立大學教師待遇應分為固定待遇與彈性待遇;彈性待遇制度應分階段推動,賦予大學自主決定,經費由校務基金自籌款支應。三、規劃設計教師彈性待遇應考量環境、學校及個人因素。四、建構國立大學教師績效評量機制與淘汰機制。五、各校應分新進與現職教師彈性待遇措施,並循民主程序研議。關鍵字:國立大學、教師、教師待遇制度、公教分途、彈性待遇 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The objective of the university is to improve academic research under the respect of academic freedom and school independence on the basis of teacher’s expertise, achievements, and contributions. Designing a reasonable and flexible compensation system is the way of promoting the quality of higher education.The purpose of this study was to investigate teacher’s views on the current compensation system of the national university and on the flexible compensation system. After this study, we will propose some suggestions that could be used for the reference of improving teacher’s compensation system of the national university.The study was conducted through a literature review, detailed personal interview, and questionnaire. The subjects consisted of 1,150 full-time faculty members at 48 universities. The valid subjects were 913. Descriptive statistic analyses and single-factor variable analyses were used in this study.After a careful literature review, a detailed personal interview, and a questionnaire, we found the following facts:1. Most of the teachers understand and are satisfied with the present compensation system. They believe that their compensation can maintain their basic cost of living, but that it cannot stimulate their contributions on teaching, research, and service.2. Most of the teachers are satisfied with the current compensation structure and the ways of year-end premium, but they suggest that the academic research grants should be different based on their official ranks.3. Most of the teachers agree that the compensation system should be different between teachers and public servants.4. The compensation system should be divided into a regular compensation and a flexible compensation. The regular compensation should have the same requirements; the flexible compensation is based on types of schools, teacher’s duties, specialties, and contributions.5. The measurement of the flexible compensation should be suitable for junior teachers and senior teachers.6. The teacher’s flexible compensation system should be considered together with the problems of juridical person of national university and university foundations.7. Most of the teachers at the national universities agree that the university can decide teachers’ flexible compensation and that the compensation budget must come from university foundations.8. The design of flexible compensation should first be considered together with teacher’s contributions on teaching, research, and service; and next with environmental factors and school’s contribution factors.9. The principle of teacher’s evaluation of contributions should be stipulated by the Minister of Education, the evaluation index and the percentage be authorized by the school, and the teacher’s annual evaluation of contributions be adopted the first instance, first appeal, and second appeal.10. The flexible compensation system should have the elimination through competition.11. Teachers at general universities are less favorable to the flexible compensation system than those at other types of universities. Teachers of physical education and social science and liberal arts are more favorable than other fields of teachers. The higher ranks the teachers have, the more they agree. The senior teachers more understand and are satisfied with the compensation system than the junior teachers.12. The teachers at art universities and general universities are more favorable to environmental factors and school’s contribution factors than those at other types of universities. Teachers of social science and liberal arts are less favorable than those of other fields of teachers. The higher ranks the teachers have, the more they agree.According to the study and the findings mentioned above, we proposed the following specific suggestions:1. Different compensation systems between teachers and public servants should be established as soon as possible.2. The compensation system should be divided into regular compensation system and flexible compensation system. The flexible compensation system must be pushed step by step and be decided by the university. Its budget should come from the foundations raised by the school itself.3. The teacher’s flexible compensation should be considered together with environmental, school, and personal factors.4. The government should establish the evaluation and elimination system on teacher’s contributions.5. The school should find out a democratic procedure to decide a senior and a junior teacher’s flexible compensation.Key Words: national universities, teachers, teacher’s compensation systems, different ways of teachers and public servants, flexible compensation | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………1第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………………1第二節 研究問題…………………………………………………………6第三節 主要名詞釋義……………………………………………………7第四節 研究方法…………………………………………………………9第五節 研究範圍與限制…………………………………………………11第二章 大學教師待遇制度理論探討 ………………………………… 13第一節 教師待遇制度意涵及相關概念…………………………………13第二節 教師待遇制度的理論基礎………………………………………33第三節 大學教育理念與教師待遇制度之關係…………………………41第三章 美國與我國大學教師待遇制度實務探討………………………53第一節 美國大學教師待遇制度現況分析………………………………53第二節 我國國立大學教師待遇制度現況分析…………………………70第三節 我國國立大學與美國州立大學教師待遇制度比較……………90第四章 深度訪談與問卷調查研究設計及實施…………………………95第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………95第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………………97第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………………101第四節 資料處理…………………………………………………………104第五章 深度訪談與問卷調查研究結果分析及討論……………………106第一節 深度訪談主要意見分析…………………………………………106第二節 問卷調查受試者基本特性分析…………………………………112第三節 國立大學教師待遇制度現況問題分析與討論…………………117第四節 國立大學教師待遇制度改進方向分析與討論…………………154第六章 研究發現與建議 ……………………………………………… 197第一節 研究發現…………………………………………………………197第二節 建議………………………………………………………………204參考書目……………………………………………………………………209附錄一 深度訪談題………………………………………………………215附錄二 我國國立大學教師待遇制度改進之研究問卷(專家問卷)……216附錄三 我國國立大學教師待遇制度改進之研究問卷(正式問卷)……227附錄四 深度訪談逐字稿…………………………………………………234 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 49084 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 86155 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 87517 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 26058 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 67456 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 212389 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 435122 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 464129 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 238322 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 1515999 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 169093 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 132637 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 579665 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089921031 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 國立大學 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 教師 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 教師待遇制度 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公教分途 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 彈性待遇 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 我國國立大學教師待遇制度改進之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 丁志權(民85)。教師待遇條例草案評析。人事月刊,23卷3期,32-39。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王秋娥(民72)。教師社會化理論及其在師資培育上的應用。輯於郭為藩等,當代教育理論與實際。台北:五南,697-759。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王淑俐(民78)。教室中的主人:老師-論我國教師的課程決定權。國教世紀,24卷4期,22-25。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 丘昌泰(民87)。建立績效導向的公務員俸給政策。空大行政學報,8期,103-128。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院(民92)。行政院高等教育宏觀委員會規劃報告書。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院研究發展考核委員會(民73)。合理訂定公務人員待遇標準之研究。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院教育改革審議委員會(民85)。教育改革總諮議報告書。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳三靈(民85)。建構教師待遇制度之芻議。人事月刊,23卷1期,14-24。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳三靈(民89)。教育人需要知道的事。台北:商鼎文化。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳三靈(民87)。建構公教分途的教師人事制度。人事月刊,27卷4期,32-37。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳貞宜(民89)。日中(大陸)美三國中小學教師職級制度之比較研究。嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳貞宜(民90)。中小學教師待遇之內涵與制度類型之探討。教育研究資訊,9(1),121-133。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳瓊洳(民88)。從吉諾斯的公共知識份子觀論現代教師應有的角色。中等教育,50(3),78-86。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 巫和懋、霍德明、態秉元、胡春田(民88)。經濟學2000-跨世紀新趨勢(上冊)。台北:雙葉書廊。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李忠正(民79)。改進公務人員待遇標準之研究。人事月刊,10卷4期,18-26。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李建華、茅靜蘭(民80)。薪資制度與管理實務。台北:超越企管顧問公司。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 金耀基(民88)。大學理念的變遷。發表於1999年大學教育改革研討會,十月七日至八日,中央研究院社會問題研究推動委員會主辦。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 周祝瑛(民82)摘譯,Scott, J. A. & Bereman, N. A.(1992)原著,九十年代美國大學教師待遇的挑戰。比較教育通訊,32期,9-11。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 周祝瑛(民86)。從世界高等教師的改革趨勢談我國高等教育的改革方向。輯於黃俊傑編,大學理念與校長遴選。台北:中華民國通識教育學會,171-194。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林惠玲、陳正倉(民91)。應用統計學(二版)。台北:雙葉書廊。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林清江(民75)。大學教師的角色。師友,223期,6-9。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林曉瑩(民90)。我國中小學教師待遇制度之研究。嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 施能傑(民88)。美國政府人事管理。台北:商鼎文化。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 施能傑(民83)。我國行政機關俸給政策的公平性。政大學報,69期,27-55。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 凌新福(民89)。國民中學教師薪給制度改革之研究。高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 秦夢群(民91)。教育行政-理論部分。台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 高強華(民80)。主要國家大學自主性之比較研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部(民89)。大學教育政策白皮書(草案)。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部(民90)。大學教育政策白皮書。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部(民92)。中華民國教育統計。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張榮顯(民85)。我國中小學教師待遇制度之研究。嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許耿地(民82)。教育人員任用條例。輯於陳益興主編,我國主要教育法規釋論。台北:五南,135-190。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許濱松(民79)。人事行政(全)。台北:華視文化事業公司。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許濱松(民86)。從英美經驗談公務部門功績獎勵問題(下)。公務人員月刊,17期,29-42。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許濱松(民86)。從英美經驗談公務部門功績獎勵問題(上)。公務人員月刊,16期,24-34。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭為藩(民76)。大學教師的學術自由與社會責任。理論與政策,2(1),20-33。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭榮哲(民81)。策略性的薪資設計在管理上的應用。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳月春、王崇斌(民88)整理。公教人事分途管理提昇教師競爭力-人事制度再造系列座談之二。人事月刊,28卷6期,26-34。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳惠玟(民85)。績效薪資制度的應用。勞工研究,123期,83-96。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳森松(民75)。經濟理論與運用。台中:國彰出版社。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳順和(民88)。教師分級制度與教師待遇與升遷。教育資料與研究,31期,18-20。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳榮順(民82)。八十三年軍公教人員待遇調整記緯。人事月刊,17卷1期,32-38。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳麗珠(民79)。台灣省私立高級中等學校任用與待遇情形之研究。台灣省政府教育廳委託專案研究報告。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳麗珠(民81)。私立高級中等學校教師薪給問題。高雄師範大學學報,第3期,93-119。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳麗珠(民89)。美國教育財政改革。台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳麗珠(民89)。美國教師薪給制度改革趨勢之研究。高雄師範大學學報,第11期,157-179。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 單文經(民85)。美國中小學教師薪資給付制度的變革。輯於中華民國師範教育學會主編,教師權力與責任。台北:師大書苑,371-384。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃英忠(民86)。現代人力資源管理。台北:華泰。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃坤錦(民84)。從教師專業論教師評鑑。輯於中華教育學會主編,教育評鑑。台北:師大書苑,229-246。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃炳煌(民79)。二十一世紀我國高等教育的展望。輯於淡江大學教育研究中心二十一世紀基金會編,彩繪二十一世紀的台灣教育。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃炳煌(民86)。大學自主與大學評鑑。輯於陳漢強編,大學評鑑。台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃政傑(民90)。大學教育改革。台北:師大書苑。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃俊傑(民86)。當前大學教育困境及其對應策略。輯於黃俊傑編,大學理念與校長遴選。台北:中華民國通識教育學會,213-230。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃家齊(民86)。技術特性與薪資給付基礎之關係研究-績效控制觀點。台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃堅厚(民78)。大學院校教師升等改進辦法之研究。台北:行政院研考會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 董保城(民89)。大學運作與學術自由、大學自治之研究。教育部委託研究。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 董保城(民89)。我國大學現今運作困境與未來公法人化之整備。教育研究資訊,8(4),1-17。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蓋浙生(民88)。教育財政與教育發展。台北:師大書苑。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡良文(民82)。公教合一與公教分途之探討。教師天地,64期,25-31。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡保田(民76)。教育行政專題研究。高雄:復文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡玲玉(民78)。薪資管理制度與勞資關係氣氛之研究。政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡憲六(民69)。企業薪資管理。台北:三民。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 諸承明(民84)。薪資設計要素與組織效能關係之研究-以組織特性與任務為情境變項。台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉兆玄(民91)。規劃因應高等教育發展專案報告。台北:教育部。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉曉芬(民89)。我國大學教師資格審查制度之研究。政治大學教育研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝棋楠(民88)。中美大專教師待遇決定制度之探討。台南女子技術學院學報,18期,225-240。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝慶勳(民81)。薪酬制度對企業營運之影響。文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AACSB Report(2002). | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alexander, K. & Salmon, R. G. (1995). Public School Finance. New York:Allyn & Bacon. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bennett, Marcia Moore(2001). Alterations to Faculty Compensation Structures at Midwest Medical Schools. Ph. D Dissertation, The University of Oklahoma. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cohn, E. & Geske, T. G. (1990). The Economics of Education (3rd ed.). Great Britain:BPCC Wheatons Ltd. Exeter. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ehrenberg, Ronald G(2002). Studying Ourselves: the Academic Labor Market, NEBR Working Paper Series NO.8965. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fleisher, B. M. & Kinesner, T. J. (1980). Labor Economics:Theory, Evidence, and Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Globerman, Missy(2000). Cornell Faculty Salaries to Increase: Pay Will Reach Equal Level to Competitors, Ithaca Journal. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Graham, W. F.(1991). Varied Practices in Faculty Salary Administration:Necessarily Unfair? Ph. D Dissertation, Cornell University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hills, F. S.(1987). Compensation Decision Making. Chicago:The Dryden Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kansas State University(1998). Faculty Handbook: Faculty Evaluation Criteria, Department of Economics, Manhattan, Kansas. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kansas State University(2000). Faculty Handbook: Policy Statement for Decision Emceeing Annual Evaluations and Promotion and Tenure of Faculty, Department of Finance, College of Business Administration, Manhattan, Kansas. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kansas State University(1998). Faculty Handbook: Faculty Evaluation Criteria, Department of Economics, Manhattan, Kansas. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Klaff, Daniel B. and Ronald G. Ehrenberg(2002). Collective Bargaining and Staff Salaries in American Colleges and Universities, NBER Working Papers NO.8661. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lawler, E. E. III,.(1987). What’s Wrong With Point-Factor Job Evaluation. Personnel, 64,38-44. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lawler, E. E. III,.(1990). Strategic Pay:Aligning Organizational Strategies and Pay system. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mahoney, Thomas A.(1989). Mulitiple Pay Contingencies:Strategic Design of Compensation. Human Resource Management, 28(3),15-28. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Millkovich, G. T & J.M.Newman(1990). Compensation. Lrwin, Boston:Richard D.lrwin,Inc. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ohio State University(2002). Faculty Handbook, Columbus, Ohio. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Plater, W. M.(1995). Future work: faculty time in 21st century. Change, 27(3), 22-33. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rebore, R. R.(1995). Personnel Administration in Education-A Management Approach. (4thed.). Boston:Allyn and Bacon. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rehman, Q. N.(1993).Earnings Profiles of Department Heads(Faculty Salary), Ph. D Dissertation, Kansas State University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Robbins, S. P. (1978). Personnel:The Management of Human Resources. Engewood Cliffs, New York:Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scott, J. A;Bereman. N. A. (1992). Competition Versus Collegiality-Academe’s Dilemma for the 1990s. Journal of High Education , 63(6). 684-698. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Silander, L.(1983). Faculty Compensation Policy, In J. Fuller(Ed.). New Direction for Higher Education, No.41, 21-36. Sam Francisco: Jossey-Bass | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stapleton, L. M.;Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Evaluating Faculty Salary Equity Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. U.S., Maryland. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strathman, J. G. (2000). Consistent Estimation of Faculty Rank Effects in Academic Salary Models. Research in Higher Education v41 n2 p237-50. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Swanson, A. D. & R. A. (1997). School Finance:Its Economics and Politics (2nd ed.). New York:Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Syracuse University(2002.). Faculty Handbook, New York, NY.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University of Southern California(2002). The National Academy for Academic Leadership, the Faculty Reward System: Priorities and the Promotion and Tenure Process. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University of Southern California(2002). Faculty Handbook, Los Angels, CA.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yarbrough, H.L(1986). A Study of the Methodology Used in the Determination of Entry Level Faculty Salaries, Salary Adjustment, and Annual Salary Increase in Selected Colleges and Universities in the United State, Ph. D Dissertation, Ann Arbor, Michigan. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zoghi, Cindy(2003). Why Have Public University Professor Done So Badly? Economics of Education Review, VO1.22 pp.45-57. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wechsler, Harold S (2001). The National Education Association 2001 Almanac of Higher Education. Washington, U.S., District of Columbia. | zh_TW |