Publications-Theses

題名 臺北市區公所溝通績效之研究:Pandey & Garnett公部門溝通績效模型之探討與驗證
A Study of Communication Performance in District Offices, Taipei City: An Inquiry and Verification on Pandey & Garnett’s Model of Public Sector Communication Performance
作者 陳建樺
Chen, Chien Hua
貢獻者 吳瓊恩
陳建樺
Chen, Chien Hua
關鍵詞 臺北市區公所
溝通績效
官樣文章
組織文化
日期 2006
上傳時間 19-Sep-2009 15:08:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 臺北市區公所為臺北市政府的派出機關,立於第一線提供市民各項服務,其服務績效之良窳,對於市府的整體績效影響甚大,如何提升區公所溝通績效,進而促進區公所的組織績效,為研究者從事本研究的動機之一。再者,本研究理論架構主要是參考Pandey & Garnett(2006)所提出的「公部門溝通績效模型」。研究者審閱國內相關文獻,目前尚無學者就該理論模型進行全面實證研究,因此研究者乃以臺北市區公所的溝通績效來探討與檢證該模型,此為本研究的動機之二。
本研究以臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員為研究對象,除採文獻探討法以建構本研究之架構與研究假設外,並採問卷調查法,內容包括公務人員個人基本資料、機關特性量表與溝通績效量表三部份之問卷為研究工具。以分層隨機抽樣臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員706位,回收有效問卷589份,分別以敘述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森(Pearson)積差相關、多元逐步回歸等統計分析方法,考驗研究假設,回答研究問題,據以提出結論與建議。
本研究主要發現如下:
一、在機關特性認知方面:臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員大致同意其所屬機關的目標定義明確,其同仁亦普遍重視任務與目標的達成,並且在達成目標的過程中,人員的凝聚力與士氣是重要的;在本機關對外發布消息時,重視依特定程序來進行。
二、在溝通績效認知方面:臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員在與同仁間的溝通上常能獲得相當助益,包括產生有效的行動方案與困難的解決,在對外的績效上提供公眾所需的服務及快速回應公眾的要求。
三、上述兩者在個人背景變項上的差異分析:男性公務人員對採購官樣文章認知程度較女性公務人員高;隨著年齡的增加,年長者的個人的閱歷較年輕者為豐富,對機關的特性、機關文化的認知也較為深刻;學歷低者對機關的認同感較高;年資較深者對機關的特性、機關文化的認知也較為深刻;薦任公務人員在機關特性及其關懷員工構面的認知程度上高於委任公務人員;主管人員在內部溝通績效的認知上較非主管人員高。
四、機關特性對溝通績效的預測力方面:以關懷員工構面最高,顯示公務人員對感受到機關對其關懷的程度越高,則其對溝通績效的認知程度也越高。
最後,根據結論提出若干建議供臺北市區公所調整機關特性的策略與方向、提升溝通績效之參考以及後續研究之具體建議。
參考文獻 一、中文部分
王保進(1999),視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究,臺北:心理出版社。
吳明隆(2003),SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計,臺北:知城數位科技。
吳瓊恩(2006),行政學,增訂三版,臺北:三民。
邱皓政(2005),量化研究方法(二):統計原理與分析技術,臺北:雙葉書廊。
許南雄 編著(2000),行政學術語,增訂三版,臺北:五南。
許道然(2001),公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
張潤書(1998),行政學,臺北:三民。
劉毓玲 譯(1993),(D. Osborne & T. Gaebler 原著),新政府運動,臺北:天下文化。
陳千玉 譯(1996),(E. H. Schein原著),組織文化與領導,臺北:五南。

二、英文部分
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Beck, C. E. (1999). Managerial communication: Bridging theory and practice. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
------------------ (1993). “A theory of government ‘red tape’ ,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 3(3), pp.273,303.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Downs, C. W., Clampitt, P. G. & Pfeiffer A. L. (1988). “Communication and organizational outcomes,” in G. M. Goldhaber & G. A. Barnett(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication, Norward, NJ: Ablex. pp.171-211.
Eisenberg, E. M. & Riley, P. (2000). “Organizational culture,” in F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam(eds.), The new handbook of administrative communication : Advances in theory, research, and methods,Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp.291-322.
Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
Falcione, R. L., Sussman, L. & Herden, R. P. (1987). “Communication climate in organizations,” in F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp.195-227.
Garnett, J. L. (1992). Communicating for results in government : A strategic approach for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
-------------------- (1997). “Administrative communication: Domains, threats, and legitimacy,” in J. L. Garnett ,& A. Kouzmin(eds.), The handbook of administration communication, New York: Marcel Dekker. pp.3-20.
Gianakis, G. & Wang, X.(2000). “Decentralization of the purchasing function in municipal government: A national survey,” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management , 12(3), pp.421-440.
Gortner, H. F., Mahler, J. & Nicholson, J. B. (1997). Organization theory: A public perspective, Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Grunig, J. E. (1992). “Symmetrical systems of Internal communication,” in J. E. Grunig(ed.), Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp.531-576.
-------------------- (1997). “Public relations management in government and business,” in J. L. Garnett & A. Kouzmin(eds.), The handbook of administrative communication, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp.241-284.
-------------------- & Grunig, L. A. (2000). “Public relations in strategic management and strategic management of public relations: Theory and evidence from the IABC excellence project,” Journalism Studies, 1(2), pp.303-321.
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior, utilizing human resources, 3rd. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hodgetts, R. M. (1982). Management: Theory, process and practice. N.Y.: The Dryden Press.
Holzer, M. (ed.) (1992). The public productivity handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Huseman, R. C. & Miles, E. W. (1988). “Organizational communication in the information age: Implications of computer-based systems,” Journal of Management, 14(2), pp.181-204.
Jablin, F. M. (1987). “Formal organizational structure,” in F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts , & L. W. Porter(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication : An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp.389-419.
----------------- & Putnam, L. L. (eds.)(2000). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
-------------------------------------------, Roberts, K. H. & Porter, L. W. (eds.)(1987). The handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
Johnson, D. W. (1972). Reaching Out. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations, 2nd. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Khademian, A. M. (2002). Working with culture: The way the job gets done in public programs. Washington,DC: CQ Press.
Lewis, P. V. (1975). Organizational communications: The essence of effective management. Columbus, OH: Grid.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McPhee, R. & Poole, M. S. (2000). Organizational structure and configurations, in F. M. Jablin and L. L. Putnam(eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods, pp.503-543.
Miller, D. (1987). “Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance,” Academy of Management Journal , 30(1), pp.7-32.
Narayanan, V. K. & Raghu N. (1993). Organization theory: A strategic approach. Boston, MA: Irwin, Inc.
Nutt, P. C. & Backoff, R. W. (1992). Strategic management of public and third-sector organization: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco:Jossey-Wesley.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. MA: Addison-Wesley.
O’Sullivan, E., Rassel, G. & Berner, M. (2003). Research methods for public administrators,4th. New Jersey: Pearson Education Ltd..
Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z. reading. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Pandey, S. K. (1995). Managerial perceptions of red tape. Unpublished PhD dissertation , Syracuse University.
--------------------(2003). National administrative studies project(NASP-II) : A national survey of managers in state health and human service agencies. Candem, NJ: Rutgers University.
--------------------& Garnett, J. L. (2006). “Exploring public sector communication performance: Testing a model and drawing implication,” Public Administration Review, Jan/Feb 2006, pp.37-51.
-------------------- & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4) ,pp.779-799.
-------------------- & Scott, P. G. (2002). “Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts measures,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), pp.553-580.
--------------------& Welch, E. W. (2005). “Beyond stereotypes: A multistage of managerial perceptions of red tape,” Administration & Society, 37(5), pp.542-575.
Pearson, C. A. (1992). “Autonomous workgroups: An evaluation at an industrial site,” Human Relations,45(9), pp.905-936.
Pincus, D. J. & Rayfield, R. E. (1989). “Organizational communication and job satisfaction: A metaresearch perspective,” in B. Dervin , & M. J. Voigt, Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp.183-208 .
Quinn R. & McGrath M. (1985),“The Transformations of Organizational Cultures,” in P. J. Frost et al.(eds.), Organizational Culture, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp.326-327.
Rainey, H. G. (1983). “Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals and individual Roles,” Administration & Society, 15(3), pp.207-242.
--------------------(1993). “A theory of goal ambiguity in public organizations,” in J. L. Perry(ed.), Research in Public Administration, 2, pp.121-166.
-----------------------(2003). Understanding and managing public organizations, 3rd . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass, Inc.
Schneider, B. & Snyder, R. A. (1975). “Some relationships between Job satisfaction and organizational climate,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), pp.318-328.
Scott, P. G. & Pandey, S. K. (2000). “The influence of red rape on bureaucratic behavior: An experimental simulation,” Journal of policy analysis and management, 19(4), pp.615-633.
Sethia, N. K. & Van Glinow, M.A. (1985). “Arriving at four cultures by managing the reward systems,” in R. Kilmann et al.(eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisio, CA: Jossey-Bass, P. 104.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration, N.Y.: Harper & Row, Publisher, Inc.
Shrader, C. B., Lincoln J. R. & Hoffman, A. N. (1989). “The network strutctures of organizations: Effects of task contingencies and distributional form,” Human Relations , 42(1), pp.43-46.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in administrative organization, 2nd. N.Y.: Macmillan.
------------------ (1964). “On the concept of organizational goal,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(1), pp.1-22.
Stone, E. F. (1976). “The moderating effect of work-related values on the job scope-job satisfaction relationship,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance ,15(2), pp.147-167.
Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
Yammamarino, F. J. & Naughton, T. N. (1988). “Time spent communicating: A multiple level approach,” Human Relations ,41(9), pp.655-676.
Zammuto, R. F. & Krakower, J. Y. (1991). “Quantitative and qualtitative studies of organizational culture,” Organizational Change and Develop, 5(2), pp.83-114.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
94921054
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094921054
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳瓊恩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳建樺zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Chien Huaen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳建樺zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Chien Huaen_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-Sep-2009 15:08:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Sep-2009 15:08:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Sep-2009 15:08:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094921054en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34870-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94921054zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 臺北市區公所為臺北市政府的派出機關,立於第一線提供市民各項服務,其服務績效之良窳,對於市府的整體績效影響甚大,如何提升區公所溝通績效,進而促進區公所的組織績效,為研究者從事本研究的動機之一。再者,本研究理論架構主要是參考Pandey & Garnett(2006)所提出的「公部門溝通績效模型」。研究者審閱國內相關文獻,目前尚無學者就該理論模型進行全面實證研究,因此研究者乃以臺北市區公所的溝通績效來探討與檢證該模型,此為本研究的動機之二。
本研究以臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員為研究對象,除採文獻探討法以建構本研究之架構與研究假設外,並採問卷調查法,內容包括公務人員個人基本資料、機關特性量表與溝通績效量表三部份之問卷為研究工具。以分層隨機抽樣臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員706位,回收有效問卷589份,分別以敘述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森(Pearson)積差相關、多元逐步回歸等統計分析方法,考驗研究假設,回答研究問題,據以提出結論與建議。
本研究主要發現如下:
一、在機關特性認知方面:臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員大致同意其所屬機關的目標定義明確,其同仁亦普遍重視任務與目標的達成,並且在達成目標的過程中,人員的凝聚力與士氣是重要的;在本機關對外發布消息時,重視依特定程序來進行。
二、在溝通績效認知方面:臺北市區公所委任以上公務人員在與同仁間的溝通上常能獲得相當助益,包括產生有效的行動方案與困難的解決,在對外的績效上提供公眾所需的服務及快速回應公眾的要求。
三、上述兩者在個人背景變項上的差異分析:男性公務人員對採購官樣文章認知程度較女性公務人員高;隨著年齡的增加,年長者的個人的閱歷較年輕者為豐富,對機關的特性、機關文化的認知也較為深刻;學歷低者對機關的認同感較高;年資較深者對機關的特性、機關文化的認知也較為深刻;薦任公務人員在機關特性及其關懷員工構面的認知程度上高於委任公務人員;主管人員在內部溝通績效的認知上較非主管人員高。
四、機關特性對溝通績效的預測力方面:以關懷員工構面最高,顯示公務人員對感受到機關對其關懷的程度越高,則其對溝通績效的認知程度也越高。
最後,根據結論提出若干建議供臺北市區公所調整機關特性的策略與方向、提升溝通績效之參考以及後續研究之具體建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭………………………………………………………………… I
摘要………………………………………………………………… II
目次………………………………………………………………… III
圖目錄……………………………………………………………… VI
表目錄……………………………………………………………… VII
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究方法………………………………………………… 3
第三節 研究範圍、研究流程與研究限制……………………… 6
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 Pandey & Garnett之公部門溝通績效模型…………… 13
第二節 公私部門的本質差異…………………………………… 22
第三節 組織溝通之理論研究…………………………………… 32
第四節 溝通績效之理論研究…………………………………… 39
第五節 組織目標之理論研究…………………………………… 41
第六節 官樣文章之理論研究…………………………………… 42
第七節 組織文化之理論研究…………………………………… 45
第八節 組織規模之理論研究…………………………………… 54
第三章 研究設計
第一節 研究架構與研究變項說明……………………………… 57
第二節 研究問題與研究假設…………………………………… 64
第三節 問卷設計………………………………………………… 71
第四節 前測過程與研究架構、研究假設之修正……………… 73
第五節 研究調查過程…………………………………………… 94
第四章 資料分析與結果討論
第一節 個人基本資料之分析與討論…………………………… 99
第二節 機關特性與溝通績效現況分析…………………………102
第三節 機關特性認知在個人背景變項上之差異分析…………119
第四節 溝通績效認知在個人背景變項上之差異分析…………140
第五節 機關特性與溝通績效之關聯性分析……………………148
第六節 機關特性對溝通績效之預測力分析……………………155
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究發現…………………………………………………163
第二節 研究貢獻及對管理實務的涵義…………………………182
第三節 對後續研究之建議………………………………………186
參考文獻………………………………………………………………189
附錄:本研究所使用之問卷…………………………………………197
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 48933 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67647 bytes-
dc.format.extent 81470 bytes-
dc.format.extent 77858 bytes-
dc.format.extent 43823 bytes-
dc.format.extent 63921 bytes-
dc.format.extent 153179 bytes-
dc.format.extent 277559 bytes-
dc.format.extent 268948 bytes-
dc.format.extent 270322 bytes-
dc.format.extent 161663 bytes-
dc.format.extent 73131 bytes-
dc.format.extent 140907 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094921054en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臺北市區公所zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 溝通績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 官樣文章zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織文化zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 臺北市區公所溝通績效之研究:Pandey & Garnett公部門溝通績效模型之探討與驗證zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study of Communication Performance in District Offices, Taipei City: An Inquiry and Verification on Pandey & Garnett’s Model of Public Sector Communication Performanceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王保進(1999),視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究,臺北:心理出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳明隆(2003),SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計,臺北:知城數位科技。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳瓊恩(2006),行政學,增訂三版,臺北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱皓政(2005),量化研究方法(二):統計原理與分析技術,臺北:雙葉書廊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許南雄 編著(2000),行政學術語,增訂三版,臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許道然(2001),公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張潤書(1998),行政學,臺北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉毓玲 譯(1993),(D. Osborne & T. Gaebler 原著),新政府運動,臺北:天下文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳千玉 譯(1996),(E. H. Schein原著),組織文化與領導,臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beck, C. E. (1999). Managerial communication: Bridging theory and practice. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ------------------ (1993). “A theory of government ‘red tape’ ,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 3(3), pp.273,303.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Downs, C. W., Clampitt, P. G. & Pfeiffer A. L. (1988). “Communication and organizational outcomes,” in G. M. Goldhaber & G. A. Barnett(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication, Norward, NJ: Ablex. pp.171-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eisenberg, E. M. & Riley, P. (2000). “Organizational culture,” in F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam(eds.), The new handbook of administrative communication : Advances in theory, research, and methods,Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp.291-322.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Falcione, R. L., Sussman, L. & Herden, R. P. (1987). “Communication climate in organizations,” in F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp.195-227.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garnett, J. L. (1992). Communicating for results in government : A strategic approach for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------------------- (1997). “Administrative communication: Domains, threats, and legitimacy,” in J. L. Garnett ,& A. Kouzmin(eds.), The handbook of administration communication, New York: Marcel Dekker. pp.3-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gianakis, G. & Wang, X.(2000). “Decentralization of the purchasing function in municipal government: A national survey,” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management , 12(3), pp.421-440.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gortner, H. F., Mahler, J. & Nicholson, J. B. (1997). Organization theory: A public perspective, Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grunig, J. E. (1992). “Symmetrical systems of Internal communication,” in J. E. Grunig(ed.), Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp.531-576.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------------------- (1997). “Public relations management in government and business,” in J. L. Garnett & A. Kouzmin(eds.), The handbook of administrative communication, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp.241-284.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------------------- & Grunig, L. A. (2000). “Public relations in strategic management and strategic management of public relations: Theory and evidence from the IABC excellence project,” Journalism Studies, 1(2), pp.303-321.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior, utilizing human resources, 3rd. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hodgetts, R. M. (1982). Management: Theory, process and practice. N.Y.: The Dryden Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holzer, M. (ed.) (1992). The public productivity handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huseman, R. C. & Miles, E. W. (1988). “Organizational communication in the information age: Implications of computer-based systems,” Journal of Management, 14(2), pp.181-204.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jablin, F. M. (1987). “Formal organizational structure,” in F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts , & L. W. Porter(eds.), The handbook of organizational communication : An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp.389-419.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ----------------- & Putnam, L. L. (eds.)(2000). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------------------------------------------, Roberts, K. H. & Porter, L. W. (eds.)(1987). The handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publicationszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, D. W. (1972). Reaching Out. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations, 2nd. New York: John Wiley and Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Khademian, A. M. (2002). Working with culture: The way the job gets done in public programs. Washington,DC: CQ Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lewis, P. V. (1975). Organizational communications: The essence of effective management. Columbus, OH: Grid.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McPhee, R. & Poole, M. S. (2000). Organizational structure and configurations, in F. M. Jablin and L. L. Putnam(eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods, pp.503-543.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller, D. (1987). “Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance,” Academy of Management Journal , 30(1), pp.7-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Narayanan, V. K. & Raghu N. (1993). Organization theory: A strategic approach. Boston, MA: Irwin, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nutt, P. C. & Backoff, R. W. (1992). Strategic management of public and third-sector organization: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco:Jossey-Wesley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. MA: Addison-Wesley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Sullivan, E., Rassel, G. & Berner, M. (2003). Research methods for public administrators,4th. New Jersey: Pearson Education Ltd..zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z. reading. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pandey, S. K. (1995). Managerial perceptions of red tape. Unpublished PhD dissertation , Syracuse University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --------------------(2003). National administrative studies project(NASP-II) : A national survey of managers in state health and human service agencies. Candem, NJ: Rutgers University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --------------------& Garnett, J. L. (2006). “Exploring public sector communication performance: Testing a model and drawing implication,” Public Administration Review, Jan/Feb 2006, pp.37-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------------------- & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4) ,pp.779-799.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------------------- & Scott, P. G. (2002). “Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts measures,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), pp.553-580.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --------------------& Welch, E. W. (2005). “Beyond stereotypes: A multistage of managerial perceptions of red tape,” Administration & Society, 37(5), pp.542-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pearson, C. A. (1992). “Autonomous workgroups: An evaluation at an industrial site,” Human Relations,45(9), pp.905-936.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pincus, D. J. & Rayfield, R. E. (1989). “Organizational communication and job satisfaction: A metaresearch perspective,” in B. Dervin , & M. J. Voigt, Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp.183-208 .zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quinn R. & McGrath M. (1985),“The Transformations of Organizational Cultures,” in P. J. Frost et al.(eds.), Organizational Culture, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp.326-327.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rainey, H. G. (1983). “Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals and individual Roles,” Administration & Society, 15(3), pp.207-242.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --------------------(1993). “A theory of goal ambiguity in public organizations,” in J. L. Perry(ed.), Research in Public Administration, 2, pp.121-166.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -----------------------(2003). Understanding and managing public organizations, 3rd . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schneider, B. & Snyder, R. A. (1975). “Some relationships between Job satisfaction and organizational climate,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), pp.318-328.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scott, P. G. & Pandey, S. K. (2000). “The influence of red rape on bureaucratic behavior: An experimental simulation,” Journal of policy analysis and management, 19(4), pp.615-633.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sethia, N. K. & Van Glinow, M.A. (1985). “Arriving at four cultures by managing the reward systems,” in R. Kilmann et al.(eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisio, CA: Jossey-Bass, P. 104.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration, N.Y.: Harper & Row, Publisher, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shrader, C. B., Lincoln J. R. & Hoffman, A. N. (1989). “The network strutctures of organizations: Effects of task contingencies and distributional form,” Human Relations , 42(1), pp.43-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in administrative organization, 2nd. N.Y.: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ------------------ (1964). “On the concept of organizational goal,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(1), pp.1-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stone, E. F. (1976). “The moderating effect of work-related values on the job scope-job satisfaction relationship,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance ,15(2), pp.147-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yammamarino, F. J. & Naughton, T. N. (1988). “Time spent communicating: A multiple level approach,” Human Relations ,41(9), pp.655-676.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zammuto, R. F. & Krakower, J. Y. (1991). “Quantitative and qualtitative studies of organizational culture,” Organizational Change and Develop, 5(2), pp.83-114.zh_TW