| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭興弟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 許張傳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | HSU, CHANG-CHUAN | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 許張傳 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | HSU, CHANG-CHUAN | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2003 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 15:16:52 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 15:16:52 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 15:16:52 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0091921068 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34828 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 行政管理碩士學程 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 91921068 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 政務官面對急速變遷的環境，必須洞察時代的脈動，妥為因應，才能永續發展組織的業務。因此，不論工作計畫的擬定、問題的解決、或危機處理，必須掌握先機，蒐集資訊，並運用決策模型，縝密分析後採取行動，才能達到預期的目標，而正確的決策，對於機關業務的推動，更具關鍵性的影響。 本研究主要採取文獻探討、比較分析、深度訪談等研究方法。為能更深入了解我國政務官決策之方法、過程及面臨之困境，本研究參考決策相關理論，諸如，認知性決策過程、理性選擇、結構式溝通、利益團體、影響決策過程因素、政治系統過程等問題設計訪談題綱，並抽樣分別向行政院所屬相關部會，如法務部、經濟部、教育部、大陸委員會、勞工委員會、青年輔導委員會、蒙藏委員會等機關首長深度訪談，從其決策經驗及實案分析，以了解其決策之模型，並避免本研究流於理論之空談。 本研究發現：一、政務官在決策前，對於政策都能充分理解。二、政務官的決策方式，都有採用有限理性模型。三、政務官的決策方法，都有採用群體決策。四、政務官對於利益團體的活動，都認為有其必要性。五、政務官認為影響其決策的因素，可歸納為時間的壓力、輿論的反應、預算的通過、高層意見、立法院、法律限制等。六、政務官對於國內的政治生態環境皆能適應。 根據文獻探討及深度訪談發現，本研究提出以下建議，作為政務官決策之參考：一、理解政策問題。二、確定政策目標。三、建構備選方案。四、設定篩選準則。五、爭取政策支持。六、監督政策執行。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Government officials especially for those who are responsible for ministerial portfolio have to make decisions in response to the constantly changing environment. Hence, it requires takes excellent foresight, good data mining skills, superior strategic models and deliberate analysis to draft plans, solve problems, and deal with the crisis. Making the right decision serves as the key factor in the process of successful governance. In this research, the author applies the methods of literature review, comparative analysis, and in-depth interview in order to understand the decision-making process, decision methods, as well as decision dilemma confronting ministerial officials with portfolio. Further more, this research uses relevant decision -making theories, such as cognitive decision process, rational choice, structured communication, and factors affecting decision-making process, such as interest groups & political system process. Based on the parameters of literature review, the author designs the outlines of interviews and selects ministerial officials with portfolio from the ministry of justice, ministry of economic affairs, ministry of education, mainland affairs council, national youth commission, and Mongolian and Tibetan affairs commission and conducts in-depth interviews. There are several important findings derived from our 〝empirical〞case studies. First, before a government official makes his decision, he has a full grasp with the policy issue. Second, the decision models of government officials are mostly based on limited-rational model. Third, government officials often make decisions based on group consensus. Fourth, government officials think it is necessary to take opinions of interest groups into account. Fifth, government officials spend a lot of time in response to public pressure, budget & legal constraints demands of Legislative Yuan and in fathoming the attitudes of higher authorities before they make their decisions. Sixth, most government officials are quite accustomed to the political environment. According to our literature review and in-depth interviews, this study makes the following suggestions before a government official makes his or her policy decision. First, fully comprehend the content and implications of a policy. Second, set an objective for the policy. Third, keep a substitute project on hand. Forth, set criteria or standards for policy implementation. Fifth, to garner for support from government and related actors. Sixth, monitor the execution of a policy. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 …………………………………………1第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………1第二節 研究範圍與限制………………………………5第三節 研究方法及流程………………………………6第四節 重要名詞解釋…………………………………8第二章 理論基礎與文獻檢視…………… …………13第一節 決策之觀點 …………………………………13第二節 決策之種類 …………………………………20第三節 決策之程序 …………………………………24第四節 影響決策之因素 ……………………………30第五節 文獻檢視…………………………………….35第三章 決策主要機制與方法之探討 ……………44第一節 劇本規劃法 …………………………………44第二節 未來遠景建構法 ……………………………49第三節 策略規劃法 …………………………………57第四節 德菲法 ………………………………………66第五節 焦點團體法 …………………………………71第六節 小結 …………………………………………76第四章 研究設計 ……………………………………78第一節 訪談對象設計 ………………………………78第二節 訪談題綱設計 ………………………………80I第五章 研究結果與分析 ……………………………87第一節 認知性決策過程 ……………………………87第二節 理性選擇 ……………………………………92第三節 結構式溝通 …………………………………98第四節 利益團體……………………………………103第五節 影響決策過程因素…………………………110第六節 政治系統過程………………………………118第六章 結論與建議 ………………………………125第一節 研究發現……………………………………125第二節 政策建議……………………………………130第三節 後續研究之建議……………………………136參考書目一、中文書籍及期刊論文 ……………………………138二、外文書籍及期刊論文 ……………………………142三、報紙資料 …………………………………………147四、網際網路 …………………………………………147附錄附錄一：政務人員退職酬勞金給與條例 ……………148附錄二：「我國政務官決策行為之研究」訪談綱要 153附錄三：「我國政務官決策行為之研究」訪談紀錄 （A1~A7） ……………………………………154 圖表目次一、圖目次圖1-1：本文之研究流程…………………………………….7圖2-1：管理階層與決策階層………………………………21圖2-2：理性的決策過程……………………………………29圖3-1：劇本式規劃法流程表………………………………47圖3-2：未來遠景建構法過程圖……………………………50圖3-3：決策者面臨三種不確定的狀況……………………58圖3-4：經過時間推移，控制不確定決策狀況……………60圖3-5：策略抉擇多層面途徑………………………………61圖3-6：「假定分析」的過程 ……………………………64圖3-7：德菲法運用之過程…………………………………68二、表目次表2-1：個案研究（增加地方財產稅1%之可行性分析） ………………………………………………………………27表2-2：個案研究（裁員1, 500人之可行性分析） ……28表4-1：訪談對象列表 ……………………………………78表4-2：決策層面、各層面涉及之問題與訪談題目對照表 ………………………………………………………………80表5-1：「認知性決策過程」訪談意見彙整表……………91表5-2：「決策模型」訪談意見彙整表……………………97表5-3：「決策方法」訪談意見彙整表 …………………102表5-4：「利益團體」觀感訪談意見彙整表 ……………109表5-5：「影響決策過程因素」訪談意見彙整表 ………117表5-6：「政治系統過程」訪談意見彙整表 ……………124 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 87342 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 57310 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 60147 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 214434 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 355208 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 350263 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 224777 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 385013 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 207480 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 147025 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 173057 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 123014 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 123013 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 385634 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091921068 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 政務官 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 政策環境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公共政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 決策程序 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | officials with portfolio | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | political environment | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | public policy | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | decision-making process | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 政務官與決策制定~行政院部會首長決策行為之研究~ | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王進來，2000，高雄市政府機關首長領導行為之研究，國立中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 左潞生，1981，行政學，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 任德厚，1995，政治學，台北：作者自刊。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 朱志宏，1999，公共政策，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳定，1999，公共政策辭典，台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳庚，2003，行政法之理論與實用（增訂七版），台北：作者自刊。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳瓊恩，1996，行政學，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李延祝，1988，政務官責任之研究，私立中國文化大學法律研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林紀東，1994，行政法，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林基源，1999，決策與人生－現代化決策的應用，台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林鍾沂、柯義龍、陳志瑋譯（Michael Hill著），2003，現代國家的政策過程，台北：韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 胡幼慧，1996，多元方法：三角交叉檢視法，台北：巨流圖書公司。胡幼慧主編，1996，質性研究－理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：巨流圖書公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 胡慧瑩，1998，「焦點團體法對促進社會工作專業研究實務性之探究」，《社區發展季刊》，81：282-292。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 翁岳生，2000，行政法與現代國家，台北：翰蘆出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 涂懷瑩，1999，行政法原理，台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張明敏等譯（David Gergen著），2002，美國總統的七門課，台北：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張英陣、彭淑華，1996，「從優勢的觀點論單親家庭」，《東吳社會工作學報》，2：227-271。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張家洋，1996，行政法，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張家惠，1987，我國政務官甄選之研究－民國三十九年至七十五年，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張潤書，1998，行政學，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張學海，2000，我國政務官懲戒問題之研究，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳恆鈞、王崇斌、李珊瑩譯（Charles E. Lindblom & Edward J. Woodhouse著），2001，最新政策制定的過程，台北：韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳相君，2000，政務官與事務官的經濟分析，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳新民，2000，行政法學總論，台北：作者自刊。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳德禹，1996，行政管理，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳德禹，2001，問題分析與決策，台北：作者自刊。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃瑪利，1975，我國政務官懲戒制度之研究，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 詹中原，2003，危機管理－個案分析，台北：神州圖書出版有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄒文海，1971，政治學，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 管歐，1978，中國行政法總論，台北：作者自刊。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉唯玉，1991，「質的研究法之探討」，《國立成功大學社會科學學報》，4：295-316。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉淑華，2003，資訊政策決策者在電子化政府中的責任－以縣市政府為例，私立東海大學公共事務碩士學程碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 潘淑滿，2002，質性研究－理論與應用，台北：心理出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭興弟，1999，「政策規劃新方法之探析」，《法政學報》，第九期，頁1-41。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭興弟，2003，政策規劃：理論與方法，台北：商鼎文化出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蕭武桐，2002，公務倫理，台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝臥龍，1997，「優良國中教師特質之德懷分析」，《教育研究資訊》，5（3）：14-28。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鍾漢清等譯（Herbert A. Simon著），1999，管理行為－管理型組織中決策過程的研究，台北：華人戴明學院。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 韓應寧譯（Ray. M & Myers. R著），1990，創意革命，台北：天下文化出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 簡進國，2002，政務人員政治活動限制問題之研究－兼論我國政務人員法草案，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅志淵，1976，美國政府及政治，台北：正中書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision：Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown and Company.Barber, James David. 1985. The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Barnard, Chester I. 1938. The Function of the Executive. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berg, B. L. 1998. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom. C. E. 1963, A Strategy of Decision Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: Free Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carey, M. A. 1994. “The Group Effect in Focus Group: Planning, Implementing, and Interpreting Focus Group Research”. In Morse, J.M (Ed.), Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cuhls, Kerstin & Knut Blind. 2001. “Foresight in Germany: The Example of Delphi ’98 or: How can the Future be Shaped”. International Journal of Technology Management, 21, pp.767-780. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dror, Yehezkel. 1964. “Muddling through-“science” or inertia?”, Public Administration Review, 24, pp.7-153. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dror. Yehezkel. 1968. Public Policymaking Re-examined, San Francisco, Calif: Chandler.Dror, Yehezkel. 2002. Capacity to Govern: A Report to the Club of Rome. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dye, Thomas R. 1976, Policy Analysis: What Government Do, why They Do It, and What Different It Makes. Alamaba: University of Alamaba Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dyke, Vernon Van. 1968. “Process and Policy as Focal Concepts in Political Research” in Austin Ranney, ed. Political Science and Public Policy. 23-40. Chicago: Markham. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Easton, D. 1953. The Political System, New York: Knopf. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Easton, D. 1965a. A System Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Easton, D. 1965b A Framework for Political Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Etzion, A. 1967. ‘Mixed-scanning: a “third” approach to decision-making’, Public Administration Review, 27, pp.385-92. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Friedrich, Carl, J. 1963. Man and His Government: An Empirical Theory of Politics. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Friend, John & Hickling, Allen. 1987. Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. New York: Pergamon Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hrebenar, Ronald J. & Ruth K. Scott. 1990. Interest Group Politics in America, 2nded. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,p238.Kahn, Herman & Anthony J. Weiner. 1967. A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty years, N. Y.: Macmillan Publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kahn, Herman. 1978. World Economic Development: Projections for 1978 to the year 2000. Boulder. COLO: Westview Press, Inc.. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lasswell, Harold, and Kaplan, A. 1950. Power and Society. New Haven: Yale University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lindblom, C. E. 1959. “The science of muddling through”, Public Administration Review, 19, pp.78-88. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lindblom, C. E. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy, New York: Free Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lindblom, Charles E & Edward J. WoodHous. 1993. The Policy-Making Process, Prentice Hall Inc., a Simon & Schuster Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Linstone, Harold & Murray Turoff. 1975. The Delphi Methods: The Critiques and Applications. N. Y.: Addison-Wesley. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Linstone, Harold. & Murray Turoff. 1979. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. N.Y.: Addison-Wesley. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy, New York: Russell Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mitroff, Ian I & Mason, Richard O. 1981. Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory Cases and Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons: Inc. 1981. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mitroff, James R. Emshoff, & Killmann, Ralph H. 1979. “Assumtional Analysis: A Methodology for Strategic Problem-solving.” Management Science. 25.pp.583-593. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morgan. D. L. 1996. “Focus group”. In Hagan, J. & Cook, K. S. (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, 22:129-152. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Peter, Ayton. Ferrell William R. & Stewart Thomas R. 1999. Commentaries on “The Delphi Technique as a Forecasting Tool: Issues and Analysis”, International Journal of Forecasting, 15. Oct 1999. pp.377-381. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ranney, Austin. 1968. “The Study of Policy Content: A Framework for Choice” in Austin Ranney. Ed., Political Science and Public Policy. Chicago: Markham. 3-22.Ripley, Randall B. & Grace A Franklin, 1987. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Chicago, Ill. : Dorsey Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schoemaker, PJH. & Comelius Van der Heijden 1992. “Integrating Scenario into Strategic Planning at Royal Dutch / Shell”. Planning Review. 20.3 May-June, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sharkansky, Ira. 1972. Public Administration: Policy-Making in Government Agencies. Chicago: Markham. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Administrative Behavior (2nd ed). New York: Macmillan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simon, Herbert A. 1997. “Administrative Behavior-A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization”, New York: Free Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simon, Herbert A. 1997. Models of Man. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p198. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Snyder, Richard C. 1987. International Comparisons of the Distribution of Household Wealth, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Sorensen, Theodore C. 1963. Decision Making in the White House. New York: Columbia University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Steven, Wheelwright & Markridakis, Spyros. 1980. Forecasting Methods for Management. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 1980. pp. 4-12. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N. 1990. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stewart. J. M. 1994. “Future State Visioning Technique at National Rebber Company “, Planning Review Vol. 22＃2. Mar.-Apr. 1994. pp.20-27. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tichy, Gunther. 2001. “The decision Delphi as a tool of technology policy-the Austrian experience”. International Journal of Technology Management, 21. pp.756-766. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wack, Pierre. 1985. “Shooting the Rapids”, Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. 1985. p.150. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 報紙資料 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 聯合報，民國九十一年十二月二日，第二版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中國時報，民國九十三年二月二十八日，第四版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中國時報，民國九十三年五月二十七日，第二版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 聯合晚報，民國九十三年五月二十六日，第四版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 網際網站 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 世界衛生組織 http://www.who.int/en | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院衛生署疾病管制局 http://www.cdc.gov.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 法務部 http://www.moj.gov.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 經濟部 http://www.mdea.gov.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部 http://www.edu.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院大陸委員會 http://www.mac.gov.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院勞工委員會 http://www.cla.gov.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 行政院青年輔導委員會 http://www.nyc.gov.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蒙藏委員會 http://www.mtac.gov.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 全國博碩士論文資訊網 http://datas.ncl.edu.tw | zh_TW |
