| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思賢<br>孫善豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | <br> | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林浩懿 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lin, Hao-i | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林浩懿 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lin, Hao-i | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 15:39:41 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 15:39:41 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 15:39:41 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0089252020 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34485 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 政治研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 89252020 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文試圖從霍布斯在形上學的立場,關聯至他政治思想中的相關討論。霍布斯同時兼有決定論以及懷疑論的哲學思維,他藉此劃出理性與啟示之間的界線。本論文認為霍布斯藉由「事實存在」(de facto)主權的論證方式,消解了代表論的弔詭以及第一履約者的弔詭。再者,霍布斯藉由獨特的末世歷史觀,使人對於啟示領域的焦慮與盼望,轉為支持塵世和平的重要助力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論:〈創世紀〉與霍布斯的政治思想 2第壹章 霍布斯政治思想中的懷疑論與決定論 11第一節 決定論式 11第二節 懷疑論式 17第三節 語言與真理 23第四節 小結 30第貳章 霍布斯的主權論證及其弔詭 34第一節 履約如何可能? 36第二節 代表如何可能? 54第三節 征服與契約 67第四節 小結 80第參章 自然法與上帝之國 83第一節 霍布斯論上帝之國 88第二節 永生與基督 94第三節 小結 105結論 107Appendix 113The Political Implication of Hobbes’ Conception of God 113I. Introduction: the conception of God in Hobbes’ Political Philosophy 114II. Conception of God: How to prove the existence of incomprehensible God? 116III.Concluding Remark 123參考書目 127一、西文參考書目 127二、中文參考書目 132 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 64818 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 80245 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 54804 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 279248 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 357298 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 520553 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 358382 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 199935 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 73754 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 134980 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089252020 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 理性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 啟示 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 霍布斯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 契約論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 救贖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | reason | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | revelation | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Hobbes | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | contract | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | salvation | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 此世立約與彼世救贖──霍布斯政治思想中的理性與啟示 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、西文參考書目 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Augustine | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1890 St. Augustin`s City of God and Christian Doctrine, translated and edited by Philip Schaff. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library. ( Public Domain) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bull, H. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1981 “Hobbes and the International Anarchy.” Social Research Vol. XLVIII, No.4: 717-38. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chappell, Vere | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1999 “Introduction,” in Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity, ed.Vere Chappell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Connolly, William E. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1988 Political Theory and Modernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Curley, Edwin | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 “The Covenant with God in Hobbes’ Leviathan,“ presented at the Hobbes conference in London in May, 2001. The article cited here is available at www.sitemaker.umich. edu/ emcurley. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Damrosch , L | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1979“Hobbes as Reformation Theologian: Implications of Free-will Controversy,” Journal of the History of Ideas40: 339-352. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Flathman, Richard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993 Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, Individuality, and Chastened Politics. U.S.: Sage Publication. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Flew, Anthony | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1987 Agency and Necessity. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Forsyth, Murray | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1979 “Thomas Hobbes and the Eternal Relations of States.” Brit.J.International Studies 5:169-209. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1981 “Thomas Hobbes and the Constituent Power of the People,” Political Studies Vol. XXIX, No.2:191-203. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Foucault, Michel | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003 Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-76.NewYork: Picador. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fukuda, Arihiro | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 Sovereignty and the Sword: Harrington, Hobbes and Mixed Government in the English Civil Wars. New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gabriella, Slomp | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000 Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. U.K.: Macmillan Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gauthier, David | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1969 The Logic of Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993 “Between Hobbes and Rawls,” in Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract: Themes from Morals by Agreement. , ed. David Gauthier and Robert Sugden. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheat sheaf, pp.24-40. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 “Public Reason, ”Social Philosophy and Policy 12: 19-42. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Glover, Willis B. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1965 “God and Thomas Hobbes,” in Hobbes Studies, ed.K.C. Brown. Oxford: Basil Blackwell,pp.141-168. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hampton, Jean | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1986 Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hantke, Steffen | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 “Authorship in Serial Killer Narratives: David Fincher’s Se7en,”in Sun Yat-sen Journal of Humanities 12:75-95. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hobbes, Thomas | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1946 Leviathan, edited with an introduction by Michael Oakeshott. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1985 ‘Third Set of Objections With the Author’s Replies’ in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume II, translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1991 Leviathan, edited with an introduction by Richard Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 The Collected Works of Thomas Hobbes, collected and edited by Sir William Molesworth. London: Routledge Thoemmes Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1994 The Elements of Law: Natural and Politic, ed. J.G.A Gaskin.Oxford:Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 A Dialogue Between A Philosopher and A Student of the Common Laws of England, ed. Joseph Cropsey. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1998 De Cive, or On The Citizen, edited and translated by Richard Tuck and M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hood, F.C. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1964 The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes: An Interpretation of Leviathan. U.K.:Oxford. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hudson, Stephen D. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983 “Right Reason and Mortal Gods,” The Monist66: 134-145. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kacka, Gregory S. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983 “Right Reason and Natural Law in Hobbes’s Ethics,” The Monist66: 120-133. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lund,W.R | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1987 “Tragedy and Education in the State of Nature: Hobbes on Time and the Will,” Journal of the History of Ideas48: 393-410. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Malcolm, Noel | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2004 Aspects Of Hobbes. U.K.: Clarendon Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Martinich, Aloysius | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 A Hobbes dictionary. Cambridge, Mass: B. Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1999 Hobbes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 “Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679),”in The Blackwell Guide to Modern Philosophers: From Descartes to Nietzsche, ed. Steven M. Emmanuel. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, chp.2. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miller,Ted | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1998 “Thomas Hobbes and the Constraints that Enable the Imitation of God,” Inquiry42:149-76. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mintz, Samuel I | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1970 The Hunting of Leviathan: Seventeenth-Century Reactions to the Materialism and Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Missner, Marshall | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983 “Skepticism and Hobbes`s Political Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Ideas44: 407-427. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Moloney, Pat | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 “Leaving the Garden of Eden: Linguistic and Political Authority in Thomas Hobbes,” History of Political Thought Vol.XVIII.No.2:242-266. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oakeshott, Michael | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1975 Hobbes on Civil Association. Berkeley: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 Rationalism in Politics and other essays(expanded edition).forwarded by T.Fuller. Indianapolis:Liberty Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 “Letter on Hobbes.” Political Theory Vol29.no.6: 834-836.(originally written to J. Watkins in May, 1963 and published by P. Riley). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Overhoff,J□rgen | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 “The Lutheranism of Thomas Hobbes.” History of Political Thought Vol.18.no.4: 604-623. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000 Hobbes’s Theory of the Will: Ideological Reasons and Historical Circumstances. U.S.: Rowman& Littlefield Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pitkin, Hannah | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1964a “Hobbes’s Concept of Representation – Part I,” American Political Science Review Vol.58,pp. 328-40. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1964b “Hobbes’s Concept of Representation – Part II,” American Political Science Review Vol.58,pp. 902-18. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pocock, J.G.A | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1970 “Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes,” in the Diversity of History: Essays in Honour of Sir Hebert Butterfield, ed. J.H. Elliott and H.G. Koenigsberger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, reprinted in J.G.A. Pocock, Politics, Language and Time (London & Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989), 148-201.Citations here refer to the latter work. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Popkin, Richard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1982 “Hobbes and Scepticism, ”in Linus J. Thro(ed.),History of Philosophy in Making: A Symposium of Essays to Honor Professor James D. Collins on His 65th Birthday,chapter8.U.S.:University Press of America,pp.133-148. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 The third force in seventeenth century thought. New York: E.J. Brill. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rawls, John | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1987 “The idea of an overlapping consensus. ”Reprinted in Collected Papers, pp.421-48. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993 Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ridge Michael | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1998 “Hobbesian Public Reason,” Ethics 108:538-568. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Riley, Patrick | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1982 Will and political legitimacy : a critical exposition of social contract theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Samuel Hao-Yih Lin(林浩懿) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003 “The Political implication of Hobbes’ Conception of God.” Paper presented for the Annual Meeting of Taiwanese Sociology Association, November 31,2003, National Cheng Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schmitt, Carl | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1985 Political theology: four chapters on the concept of sovereignty, translated with an introduction by George Schwab. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Skinner, Q,D | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1964“Hobbes’s Leviathan, ”The Historical Journal 7:321-333. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1965“Hobbes on Sovereignty: An Unknown Discussion,” Political Studies 8:213-218. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1979“Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy,” in Interregnum: the Quest for Settlement: 1646- 1660, ed. G.E. Aylmer..London: Mcmillan, pp.79-100. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1984“The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives,” in Philosophy in History. Richard Rorty et al. eds. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,pp.193-221. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1986“The Paradoxes of Political Liberty, ”Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol.7.Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press .pp. 225-250 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1988 “Warrender and Skinner on Hobbes: A Reply,” Political Studies36: 692-695.. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990c “Thomas Hobbes on the Proper Signification of Liberty, ”in Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th ser., 40:121-151. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 “On Justice, the Common Good and the Priority of Liberty,” in Dimensions of Radical Democracy, ed. Chantal Mouffe. London: Verso Press,pp.211-224. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993 “The Ideological Context of Hobbes’s Political Thought,” in Great Western Political Thinkers Vol.4: Thomas Hobbes, ed. Subrata Mukherjee and Sushila Ramaswamy. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publication, pp.1-37. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 Vision of Politics Volume3: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Springborg, P. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1975”Leviathan and the Problem of Ecclesiastical Authority,” Political Theory, Vol.3,no.3: 289-303. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | State, S.A. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1989 “The religious and secular in the work of Thomas Hobbes,” in Religion, Secularization and Political Thought: Thomas Hobbes to J.S. Mill, ed. James E. Crimmins. London: Routledge, chp1. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strauss, Leo | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1952 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, translated from German Manuscript by Elsa M. Sinclair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sutherland, S.R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1974 “God and Religion in Leviathan,” Journal of Theological Studies, Vol. 25: 373-380. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tarlton, Charles | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1999 “‘to avoyd the present stroke of death:’Despotical Dominion, Force, and Legitimacy in Hobbes’s Leviathan” Philosophy 74:221-245. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thornton, Helen | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 “Cain, Abel and Thomas Hobbes.” History of Political ThoughtVol.XXIII No.4:611-33. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tuck, Richard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1985 “Warrender’s De Cive,” Political Studies35: 308-15. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1989 Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 “Hobbes and Locke on Toleration,”in Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Mary Dietz. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992 “The Christian Atheism of Thomas Hobbes,” in Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment, ed., M.Hunter and .Wooton. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993a Philosophy and Government, 1572-1651.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993b ”The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes” in Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, ed. N. Phillipson and Q. Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1998 “Introduction,”in De Cive, or On The Citizen, edited and translated by Richard Tuck and M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Warrender, H | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1957 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation. London: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1962 “Hobbes’s Conception of Morality, ”Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia,17: 434-449. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Williams, Michael C. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1996 “Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration.” International Organization, Vol. 50,No.2: 213-236. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zaitchik,A. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1982 “Hobbes`s Reply to the Fool: The Problem of Consent and Obligation,” Political Theory, Vol. 10, No. 2. (May, 1982), pp. 245-266. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、中文參考書目 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 尤西林 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000 <德性不再許諾幸福-《約伯記》與古代報應觀念的衰弱>,收錄於《道風》基督教文化評論第十三期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 江宜樺 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001《自由民主的理路》。台北:聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 列奧•施特勞斯 著,申彤 譯 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001《霍布斯的政治哲學》。南京:譯林出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 余麗嫦 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995《扥馬斯•霍布斯》。台北:東大圖書公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林浩懿 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 <霍布斯論理性與主權-一種試探性的評析>,發表於國立政治大學九十學年度研究生論文發表會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 柏拉圖著,郭斌和、張竹明譯 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002《理想國》。北京:北京商務印書館。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 奧古斯丁著,王曉朝譯 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2004《上帝之城 中冊》。香港:道風書社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許國賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 <寬容理念的形塑及其當代問題>,收錄於《政治科學論叢》第十七期,頁219-248。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳思賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1994 <「個人自由」或「公共權威」﹖--簡論區克夏[Michael Oakeshott]詮霍布斯[Thomas Hobbes]>,收錄於《政治科學論叢》第五期,頁87-97。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 <選擇信仰的空間--奧古斯丁異端導正論與洛克寬容論>,收錄於《政治科學論叢》第八期,頁147-164。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1998《西洋政治思想史-近代英國篇》,台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1999《西洋政治思想史-古典世界篇》,台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000 <「神曲」與經世:詩人但丁與公民但丁>,收錄於《政治科學論叢》第十二期,頁1-31。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 <天上的戰爭與人間的戰爭:彌爾頓「失樂園」與十七世紀英國政治>,收錄於《政治科學論叢》第十四期,頁1-23。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 <「君王似神祇,庶民如撒旦」:馬丁路德宗教改革運動中之政治觀>,收錄於政治科學論叢》第十七期,頁175-198。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003 <多元、寬容與道德學習:憲法與群育教育的美學關聯>,收錄於《政治與社會哲學評論》第五期,頁1-34。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2004《西洋政治思想史-中世紀篇》,台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳瑞崇 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 《《利維坦》中關於政治秩序之建構的分析》。台北:臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張福建 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 <寬容的意義極其限度>,張福建、蘇文流(編),《民主理論:古典與現代》,頁249-257。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曾慶豹 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003<利維坦與政治神學:一個現代性的批判>,收錄於《政治與社會哲學評論》第五期,頁219-255。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蕭高彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1996<共同體的理念:一個思想史之考察>,收錄於《台灣政治學刊》第一期,頁267─296。台北:台灣政治學會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002<史金納與當代共和主義之典範競爭>,收錄於《東吳政治學報》第十五期,頁33-59。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 錢永祥 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992<偉大的界定者:霍布斯絕對主權論的一個新解釋>,收錄於《人文與社會科學集刊》第五卷第一期,頁87-127。台北:中研研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997<霍布斯的懷疑論與政治理論>。台北:行政院國科會科資中心。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅爾斯著,謝延光譯 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 《正義論》。上海:上海譯文出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫善豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 <超驗幻象與拜物教>,收錄於《哲學雜誌》第十一期,頁 208-223。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 <「存有的前提」與「認識的前提」:論三種邏輯上可能的關係—以哲學史上實際出現過的三種主張為例的探討>,收錄於《政大哲學學報》第七期 ,頁181- 200。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 <價值形式與統治形式:對社會契約論的一個馬克思式的理解>,收錄於《政治與社會哲學評論》第二期,頁47-83。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003 <理性與主權:康德與霍布政治思想之對比>,發表於中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所舉辦的人民主權與憲政學術研討會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 霍布斯(Thomas, Hobbes)著 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1996 《利維坦》,黎思復、黎廷弼譯。中國:北京商務印書館。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003 《論公民》,應星、馮克利譯。中國:貴州人民出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賴榮璉 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 《理性與目的-康德政治哲研究》。台北:國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡英文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002《政治實踐與公共空間 漢娜.鄂蘭的政治思想》。台北:聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2004 <霍布斯主權理論的當代詮釋>,收錄於《公法學與政治理論—吳庚大法官榮退論文集》,頁39-78。台北:元照。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡慶樺 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000《歷史與目的—黑格爾政治哲學與歷史哲學研究》。台北:國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭曉時 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1980《霍布斯主權論的分析》。台北:國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |