| dc.contributor.advisor | 李怡青 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lee, I Ching | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林怡秀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lin, Yi Hsiu | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林怡秀 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lin, Yi Hsiu | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 9-Apr-2010 12:54:14 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 9-Apr-2010 12:54:14 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-Apr-2010 12:54:14 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095752021 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38530 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95752021 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 非語言敏感度（nonverbal sensitivity）指正確察覺與解釋他人非語言訊息的能力。過去研究發現女性的非語言敏感度優於男性，可以權力取向或社會角色理論解釋。權力取向認為女性在社會上缺乏權力，故需展現良好的非語言敏感度保障自己權益。社會角色理論認為女性擔任，或被期待擔任照顧者，因此培養良好的非語言敏感度。本研究同時探討權力取向與社會角色理論，嘗試比較兩個理論對非語言敏感度性別差異的解釋。本實驗採用兩人互動，透過權力差異的操弄與不同的議題（經濟提供者議題或照顧者議題）討論，探討互動時的非語言敏感度。每位受試者還觀看四部影片，測量無動機影響的非語言敏感度。結果顯示權力差異可解釋兩人互動的非語言敏感度，且資料型態符合權力差異者的動機解釋。而觀看影片時，相較於探討經濟提供者議題受試者，探討照顧者議題受試者有較佳的非語言敏感度。此外我們亦發現性別、權力與社會角色三因子交互作用，非語言敏感度會受到實驗分派的社會角色是否符合生理性別的傳統作業影響，符合預期狀態理論的觀點。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Nonverbal sensitivity refers to the ability to accurately detect and decode nonverbal cues communicated by others. Past research showed that women enjoy superior nonverbal sensitivity over men. Power perspective and social role theory each provides explanations for women`s superior nonverbal sensitivity. Power perspective suggests that due to the lack of power in the society, women count on their nonverbal sensitivity to get what they want and for protection. Social role theory suggests that women are more likely to be in or are usually expected to be in caretaker roles, which require their attending to others` verbal or nonverbal cues. As a result, women develop superior nonverbal sensitivity compared to men. We designed an experimental study to test explanations offered by power perspective and social role theory. In the experiment, two individuals were told to collaborate on a task either required them to be in the provider role mode (focusing on earning money) or caretaker role mode (focusing on taking care of others). Power difference was manipulated by assigning one of the two individuals to be a leader and the other follower in this task. Interactions were recorded upon participants’ consent. After interaction, the participants were asked to interpret nonverbal cues in their interaction. They were also told to view four video clips, and then report and interpret nonverbal cues in each video clip. The results suggest that nonverbal sensitivity in interaction can be best accounted for by explanations consistent with the power perspective. The powerful was better at “B sees Self” nonverbal sensitivity, and the powerless was better at “B sees Me” nonverbal sensitivity, consistent with motivational explanations. In addition, we found a three-way interaction of participant sex, power, and social role, suggesting that women had the best “B sees Me” sensitivity when they had no power and were in the provider role. And men showed the best “B sees Self” sensitivity when they had power and were in the provider role. The three-way interaction finding is consistent with predictions made by expectation states theory. However, when viewing four video clips, participants in the caretaker role had better nonverbal sensitivity than those in the provider role. Motivation was offered to account for the differential effects of power and social roles. By analyzing clips of the dyadic interactions, we found that the powerful showed more leader behavior such as deciding discussion direction, and the powerless showed more follower behavior such as stammering. However, the results of the clips did not account for the aforementioned findings of nonverbal sensitivity. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論-P.1 研究動機-P.1第二章 文獻探討-P.3第一節 非語言敏感度-P.3第二節 權力差異對非語言敏感度的影響-P.6第三節 社會角色對非語言敏感度的影響-P.12第四節 非語言敏感度的研究方法與種類-P.16第五節 研究假設-P.20第三章 預試-P.24第四章 研究方法-P.25第一節 研究設計與研究對象-P.25第二節 研究程序-P.26第三節 研究工具-P.28第四節 非語言敏感度的計算方式-P.32第五章 結果-P.34第一節 受試者基本資料與統計分析方法-P.34第二節 實驗操弄檢核-P.35第三節 權力感分析與其他可能影響依變項因素-P.36第四節 四種非語言敏感度指標的分析結果-P.37第五節 兩人互動階段的受試者影片分析-P.42第六章 綜合討論-P.44參考文獻-P.52表1 受試者組成-P.61表2 受試者各項特質性別差異-P.63表3 研究假設與實驗結果一覽表-P.64表3 本研究各依變項在各實驗情境中的平均數與信賴區間-P.66圖1 社會角色理論-P.67圖2 權力感上的三因子交互作用-P.68圖3 察覺你如何看我敏感度上的三因子交互作用-P.69圖4 察覺你如何看你自己敏感度上的三因子交互作用-P.70圖5 察覺你如何看你自己敏感度上的二因子交互作用-P.71附錄1 實驗同意書-P.72附錄2 社會角色實驗操弄-P.73附錄3 權力差異實驗操弄-P.77附錄4 人際特質量表-支配人格分量表-P.79附錄5 李氏性別特質問卷-P.80附錄6 情緒智力量表-他人情緒評估分量表-P.83附錄7 量表A、B、C、D-P.84附錄8 自我介紹影片-P.92附錄9 判斷情緒與回憶非語言行為題目-P.96附錄10 人口學變項問卷-P.98附錄11 評估者問卷（JA、JB）-P.99 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 100536 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 130736 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 122209 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 145757 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 136708 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 281905 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 133942 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 242705 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 182559 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 218731 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 149849 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 182378 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 614993 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095752021 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 非語言敏感度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 性別差異 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 權力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 社會角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 預期狀態理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | nonverbal sensitivity | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | gender difference | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | power | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | social roles | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | expectation states theory | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 非語言敏感度的性別差異：權力差異與不同社會角色期待的效果探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Gender difference on nonverbal sensitivity: Due to power differentials or different social role expectations? | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文參考文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王瑞祺（1986）。《批判理論與現代社會學》。台北:巨流。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王佳玲（2004）。《大學生情緒智力信念、創造力信念與情緒智力、創造力之關係》。國立政治大學教育學研究所，碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李美枝（1981）。〈性別特質問卷的編制及男女大學生四種性別特質類型在成就動機、婚姻、事業及性態度上的比較〉。《中華心理學刊》，23，23-37。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張殿興譯（1992）。《肢體語言》。台北：世茂。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳皎眉（2004）。《人際關係與人際溝通》。台北：雙葉書廊。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如（2006）。《社會心理學》。台北：雙葉書廊。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曾懷萱（2003）。《情緒性非語言行為的覺知特性與精神分裂病質傾向的關連性探討》。國立台灣大學心理學研究所，碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉淑美譯（1989）。《肢體語言教戰手冊》。台北：世茂。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖立文譯（1986）。《當代社會理論：從派深思到哈伯瑪斯》。台北: 桂冠。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 滿莉芳（2002）。《情緒勞務工作者情緒勞務負荷與工作結果之研究-以情緒智力與工作特性為干擾》。靜宜大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄧湘蘭（1999）。《成人情緒辨識量表之發展及其相關因素研究》。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所，碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文參考文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, P. A. (1998). The evolution of biological sex differences in communication. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication (pp. 117-136). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Balkwell, J. W., & Berger, J. (1996). Gender, status, and behavior in task situations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 273-283. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baum, K. M., & Nowicki, S., Jr. (1998). Perception of emotion: Measuring decoding accuracy of adult prosodic cues varying in intensity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 89-107. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernieri, F. J. (1991). Interpersonal sensitivity in teaching interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 98-103. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernieri, F. J., Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1994). Measuring person perception accuracy: Another look at self-other agreement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 367-378. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Blackman, M. C. (2002). The employment interview via the telephone: Are we sacrificing accurate personality judgment for cost efficiency? Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 208-223. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brody, L. R. (1985). Gender differences in emotional development: A review of theories and research. Journal of Personality, 53, 102-149. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotype: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burgoon, J. K., & Hoobler, G. D. (2002). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 240-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between woman and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580-587. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Zhillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O`Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K. (1980). Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 270-277. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. (2007). Social power. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 678-692). New York: Guilford. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Freudenthaler, H. H., Neubauer, A. C., & Haller, U. (2008). Emotional intelligence: Instruction effects and sex differences in emotional management abilities. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 105-115. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Funder, D. C. (1980). On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality rating. Journal of Personality, 48, 473-493. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guimond, S., Branscombe, N. R., Brunot, S., Buunk, A. P., Chatard, A., Desert, M., et al. (2007). Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1118-1134. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A. (1979). Gender, gender role, and nonverbal communication skills. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 32-67). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Publishers, Inc. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A., Bernieri, F. J., & Carney, D. R. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 237-281). New York, US: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A., Carter, J. D., & Horgan, T. G. (2001). Status roles and recall of nonverbal cues. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 79-99. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1994). "Subordination" and sensitivity to nonverbal cues: A study of married working women. Sex Roles, 31, 149-165. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A., Halberstadt, A. G., & O`Brien, C. E. (1997). "Subordination" and nonverbal sensitivity: A study and synthesis of findings based on trait measures. Sex Roles, 37, 295-317. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A., & Matsumoto, D. (2004). Gender differences in judgments of multiple emotions from facial expressions. Emotion, 4, 201-206. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Mast, M. S. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 141-155. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, J. A., Rosip, J. C., LeBeau, L. S., Horgan, T. G., & Carter, J. D. (2006). Attributing the sources of accuracy in unequal-power dyadic communication: Who is better and why? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 18-27. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Halpern, D. F. (1986). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henley, N. M. (1995). Body politics revisited: What do we know today? In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 27-61). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henley, N. M., & LaFrance, M. (1997, 1984). Gender as culture: Difference and dominance in nonverbal behavior. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 531-571). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Juslim, P. N., & Scherer, K. R. (2005). Vocal expression of affect. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 65-136). New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relation analysis. New York: Guilford Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth / Thomson Learning. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | LaFrance, M., & Henley, N. M. (1994). On oppressing hypotheses: Or differences in nonverbal sensitivity revisited. In H. L. Radtke & H. J. Stan (Eds.), Power / gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp. 287-311). London: Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., & Dean, J. (1993). Affect and age: Cross-sectional comparisons of structure and prevalence. Psychology and Aging, 8, 165-175. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lippa, R. A., & Dietz, J. K. (2000). The relation of gender, personality, and intelligence to judges` accuracy in judging strangers` personality from brief video segments. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 25-43. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98, 224-253. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maupin, H. E., & Fisher, R. J. (1989). The effects of superior female performance and sex-role orientation on gender conformity. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 55-69. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424-453. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Noller, P. (1980). Misunderstandings in marital communication: A study if couples` nonverbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1135-1148. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Noller, P. (2001). Using standard content methodology to assess nonverbal sensitivity in dyads. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 243-264). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Patterson, M. L., Churchill, M. E., Farag, F., & Borden, E. (1992). Impression management, cognitive demand, and interpersonal sensitivity. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 10(4), 263-271. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. from http://www.people.ku.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Proverbio, A. M., Matarazzo, S., Brignone, V., Zotto, M., & Zani, A. (2007). Processing valence and intensity of infant expressions: The roles of expertise and gender. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 477-485. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Social status and group structure. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group process (pp. 352-395). Malden, MA: Blackwell publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: A expectation states theory approach. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 217-241). New York: Guilford Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Riggio, R. E. (2006). Nonverbal skill and abilities. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 79-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosenthal, R. (2005). Conducting judgment studies: Some methodological issues. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal research (pp. 199-234). New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. M. (1979). Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication (pp. 68-103). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosip, J. C., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Knowledge of nonverbal cues, gender, and nonverbal decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 267-286. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intra-class Correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Snodgrass, S. E. (1985). Women`s intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 146-155. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Snodgrass, S. E. (1992). Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 154-158. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Snodgrass, S. E. (2001). Correlational method for assessing interpersonal sensitivity within dyadic interaction. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 201-218). Mahwah, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Snodgrass, S. E., Hecht, M. A., & Ploutz-Snyder, R. (1998). Interpersonal sensitivity: Expressivity or perceptivity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 238-249. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1079-1094. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Trost, M. R., & Alberts, J. K. (1998). An evolutionary view on understanding sex effects in communicating attraction. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication (pp. 233-255). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vrij, A. (2006). Nonverbal communication and deception. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 341-359). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and international task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Social Perspectives, 40, 1-32. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric properties and geometric characteristics of the revised interpersonal adjective scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517-530. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 243-274. | zh_TW |
