學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南建構之研究
Developing Guidelines for Library and Information Science Educational Programs in Taiwan
作者 蔡佳縈
Tsai, Chia-Ying
貢獻者 王梅玲
Wang, Mei-Ling
蔡佳縈
Tsai, Chia-Ying
關鍵詞 圖書資訊學教育
圖書資訊學教育評鑑
圖書資訊學教育指南
日期 2008
上傳時間 9-Apr-2010 15:30:56 (UTC+8)
摘要 教育部於2006年委託高等教育評鑑中心統一對全國公私立大學院校進行評鑑,評鑑工作主要以學門為分類單位,目前共分為47個學門,以因應各大學院校系所性質之多樣性,並做為遴聘評鑑委員之依據。高等教育評鑑中心僅依據學門訂定相關參考效標,並未對各專業學科發展相關標準與指南;此外,目前之評鑑作業中,各圖書資訊學系所隸屬於不同學門進行評鑑,不僅難以確保訪視委員之專業背景、各圖書資訊學系所評鑑結果之客觀性,亦使得圖書資訊學教育品質缺乏ㄧ致標準。
面對上述危機,本論文擬研究臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南,使臺灣圖書資訊學之教育評鑑活動具備更健全、更符合系所專業教育發展的衡量基礎架構,提升臺灣圖書資訊學教育品質,亦成為臺灣圖書資訊學教育品質保證依據。
本論文主要參考英美之圖書資訊學教育標準與指南,以及我國相關研究,利用內容分析法訂定臺灣圖書訊學教育指南芻議;再採焦點團體法進行研究,共舉行4場焦點團體討論會,對象分別為圖書資訊學系所教師、圖書資訊學系所主任、圖書資訊學系所研究生與圖書館館員;各場次參與者對圖書資訊學教育指南芻議進行討論,凝聚臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南所應具備之要件與內涵共識。
本研究最後所形成之圖書資訊學教育指南草案共分為圖書資訊學定義與範圍、教育任務與目標、課程、教師團隊、學生、行政管理、教學資源與設施等7大項,27小項,40個分項指標;教育指南草案適用範圍涵蓋大學部、研究所(碩士班、博士班)、專業學程與繼續教育。研究建議包括中華圖書資訊學教育學會舉辦論壇討論草案再行公佈、舉辦圖書資訊學學門意涵與教育工作坊、專案研究圖書資訊學教育評鑑制度、推動圖書資訊學教育評鑑與指南之實施。
In 2006, the Ministry of Education commended the higher education evaluation to Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan. Higher education evaluation divided all universities into 47 colleges, to respond to schools’ variegation and to choose the evaluation members. Higher education evaluation center only sets related guidelines according to different colleges, but doesn’t provide related standards or guidelines to professional disciplines. In addition, library and information science schools are attached to different colleges in current evaluation, and that may cause unfair assessments and impact evaluation results.
Faced with the crises above, this thesis on guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan is to make the educational evaluation of library and information science develop better, fit the professional needs, and enhance the quality of education.
This paper refers library and information science education standards and guidelines of Britain and the United States, as well as related researches in Taiwan. We used the content analysis to develop draft of guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan, and then held four focus group interviews which were aimed at different targets of the Department of Library and Information Science: teachers, directors, students and librarians, to discuss the draft of guidelines and cohere the content and elements of guidelines.
The final form of guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan is divided into 7 parts, including the definition, goals and objectives, curriculum, faulty, students, administration, and physical resources and facilities. There are 27 indicators, and 40 sub-indicators. The guidelines offered here are primarily applied to the undergraduate, graduate(Master classes and PhD), professional programs and continuing education level. Finally, we suggested that the Association of Library and Information Science Education of Republic of China should hold discussion of the guidelines, and other related associations should hold workshops on education of library and information science as well as research in evaluation system of library and information science, and promote the educational evaluation and implementation of library and information science.
參考文獻 一、 中文
(一) 專書
Krueger, Richard A.著;洪志成、廖梅花譯。焦點團體訪談。嘉義市:濤石文化,民92。
Stewart, David W.等著;歐素汝譯。焦點團體:理論與實務。臺北市:弘智文化,民88。
丁友貞。美國圖書館學教育認可制度之探討。台北市:漢美圖書有限公司,民83。
王梅玲。英美圖書館與資訊科學碩士教育之比較研究。臺北市:漢美圖書,民85。
王梅玲。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。臺北市:文華圖書管理,民94。
王梅玲。中華民國九十二年圖書館年鑑。臺北市:國家圖書館,民92。
王梅玲。二十一世紀我國學術圖書館館員應具備的知識與技能的研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,民90。
李德竹。資訊科學與圖書館學。台北市:文華圖書館理,民89。
胡述兆、吳祖善合著。圖書館學導論。臺北市:漢美,民78。
胡述兆。圖書資訊學導論。台北市:漢美,民94。
周寧森。圖書資訊學導論。台北市:三民書局,民80。
胡述兆主編。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北:國立編譯館,民84。
柯雲娥。「傳播學門大學生資訊素養能力的研究」。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,碩士論文,民93。
陳雪華。教育部人文社會科學第三期中成教育改進計畫—圖書資訊學門規劃報告。台北市:臺灣大學圖書資訊學系,民88。
蘇錦麗。高等教育評鑑:理論與實務。臺北市:五南,民86。
(二) 期刊論文
王梅玲。「圖書資訊學教育標準之探討」。中國圖書館學會會報63期(民88年12月):105-118。
王梅玲。「從教育標準探討圖書資訊學核心課程」。圖書與資訊季刊61期(民96年5月):57-74。
王梅玲。「圖書資訊學教育之評鑑」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊16期(民90年6月):3-9。
王梅玲。「臺灣圖書館教育史(1954-2007年)」。臺灣圖書館事業與教育史研討會論文集(民96年5月):67-88。
李德竹。「教育部和本系新修訂之圖書館學必修課程」。書府11期:7-8。
李德竹、莊道明。「圖書館學與資訊科學課程革新之探討」。資訊傳播與圖館學4:1(民86年9月):17-25。
邱子恆。「美國地區圖書資訊學教育之認可制度」。國立中央圖書館台灣分館館刊6:6 (民89年12月):8-19。
胡述兆、王梅玲。「英美圖書資訊學碩士教育之比較」。圖書館學與資訊科
學20:2(民83年10月):40-63。
吳美美。「重新定義圖書館與圖書資訊學」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊19期(民91):10-14。
高博銓。「教育研究法:焦點團體訪談法」。教育研究月刊103期(民91):101-110。
陳雪華等。「圖書館學系核心課程之規劃研究」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會
會訊 12期(民88年6月):1-6。
楊美華。「圖書館學碩士教育之檢討與展望」。中國圖書館學會會報58期(民86年6月):27-35。
楊美華。「我國圖書資訊學教育的省思」。圖書館學與資訊科學30:2(民93 年10月):46-58。
蔡明月。「從圖書館與資訊科學的遞嬗反省圖書館的定義」。圖書館新定義(民94):64。
盧秀菊。「談圖書館學與資訊科學教育大學部學程及學科專長問題」。圖書與資訊學刊 23期(民86年11月):1-8。
(三) 網路資源
高等教育中心。「系所評鑑介紹」。<http://www.heeact.org.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年9月18日)。
盛杏湲。「焦點團體法」。 <http://www.scenariolab.com.tw/project/pfn/ upload/%E7%84%A6%E9%BB%9E%E5%9C%98%E9%AB%94%E6% B3%95-%E7%9B%9B%E6%95%99%E6%8E%88.pdf >(檢索日期:2007年12月5日)。
劉維琪。「維基式評鑑,彌補現行評鑑制度盲點」。 <http://news.sina.com.tw/
edu/cna/tw/2007-09-03/141612687459.shtml> (檢索日期:2007年9月18日)。
「台師大等11系所評鑑結果」。 <http://news.sina.com.tw/edu/cna/tw/2007-09-03/141612687459.shtml> (檢索日期:2007年9月18日)。
「私立世新大學資訊傳播學系」。<http://ic.shu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「世新大學資訊傳播學系課程規劃」。<http://ic.shu.edu.tw/index.php? code=list&ids=13&menu_id=15 > (檢索日期:2008年3月1日)。
「私立玄奘大學圖書資訊學系」。<http://www.hcu.edu.tw/hcu3/content/ lis01/content/act/act01.asp?sn=10>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「私立淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系所」。<http://www.dils.tku.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「私立輔仁大學圖書資訊學系所」。<http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「輔仁大學文學院中國古籍整理學程」。 <http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/ lins/portal/main.html> (檢索日期:2008年3月1日)。
「國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所」。<http://www.nchu.edu.tw/~gilis/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所」。<http://www.lias.nccu.edu.tw/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系所」。<http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系」。<http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/ace/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所」。<http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/GLIS/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「國立交通大學電機學院/資訊學院在職專班數位圖書資訊組」。<http://dlp.lib.nctu.edu.tw/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。
「國立臺灣大學知識管理學程修習辦法」。<http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2008年3月1日)。
二、 西文
(一) 專書
ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science. Chicago: American Library Association, 1983.
ALA Glossary of Library Terms. Chicago: American Library Association, 1943.
American Library Association. Standards for Accreditation, 1951. Chicago: American Library Association, 1951.
American Library Association. Standards for Accreditation, 1972. Chicago:American Library Association, 1972.
Bramley, Gerald. A History of Library Education in the United Kindom. London: Bingley, 1981.
Carroll, C Edward. The Professionalization of Education for Librarianship. Metuchen, N.J. : Scarecrow Press, 1970.
Dalkey, Norman C. Predicting the Future. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.,Oct. 1968.
David, Lim. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Study of Developing Countries. Hants: Ashgate, 2001.
Doyle, Christina S. Development of a Model of Information Literacy Outcome Measures With National Education Goals of 1990. Ph. D.Theses, Northern Arizona University, 1992.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. The Program Evaluation Standards. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 1994.
John Richardson. The State of Library and Information Science Education. Greenwich, CO: JAI Press, 1994.
Jones, D. British Librarianship and Information Work 1981-1985. London: Library Association, 1988.
Josephine Yu Chen Sche. Education Systems for Librarianship in the Federal Republic of Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States of America: A Comparative Study. Ph. D. diss., University of Florida State University, 1983.
John S Brubacher. Education For the Professionals: The Sixty-first Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Library Advisory Council and Library Advisory Council. A Report on the Supply and Training of Librarians. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,1968.
Library Association. Procedures for the Approval of Course at Full-Time School of Librarianship in the United Kingdom. London: Library Association, 1993.
Lilly,D.B. and Trice, R.W. A History of Information Science, 1945-1985. New York: Academic Press, 1989.
Morgan, David L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series 16. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub., 1997.
Nasri, William Z. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Vol. 7eds. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1972.
Philip. Whiteman. Public libraries since 1945 : the impact of the McColvin report. London : C. Bingley, 1986.
Quality Assurance Agenc. Final Phase 1 Subject Standards Statement in 22 Subjects. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2000.
Quality Assurance Agenc. Final Phase 2 Subject Standards Statement in 25 Subjects. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2002.
Rossi,P. H. and Freeman, H. E. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
Schur, H. and Saunders, W. L. Education and Training for Scientific and Technological Library and Information Work. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1986.
Shera, Jesse H. Introduction to Library Science. Littelton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1976.
Shera, Jesse H. The Foundations of Education for Librarianship. New York: Becker and Hayes, 1972.
Stewart, David W. Shamdasani, Prem N. Rook, Dennis W. Focus groups : theory and practice. Thousand Oaks : SAGE Publications, 2007.
Swan, J. Developing a New Quality Assurance Model for Higher Education: Update on Trials. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 1999.
Tylaor, Robert S. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1966.
Williamson, Charles C. Training for Library Service: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Boston, MA: The Merrimount Press, 1923.
World encyclopedia of library and information services. Chicago : American Library Association, 1993.
Young, Kenneth E. Understanding Accreditation. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 1983.
Yu Chen, Josephine. Education Systems for Librarianship in the Federal Republic of Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. PhD. Thesis: Florida State University, 1983.
(二) 期刊論文
Borko, H. “ Information Science: What is it?” American Documentation 19 (January 1968):3-4.
Bush,V. “As We may Think.” Atlantic Monthly176:1(1945):101-108.
Diljit Singh. “Accreditation of Library and Information Science Education Programs: The Malaysian Experience.” The 2ed International Conference on Asia-Pacific Library and Information Education and Practice (2007):87-112.
Holley, Edward G. “One Hundred Years of Progress: The Growth and Development of Library Education.” The ALA Yearbook of Library and Information Services11(1986):23-28.
Hurt, C.D. “The Future of Library Science in Higher Education:A Crossroads for Library Science and Librarianship.” Advances in Librarianship (New York : Academic Press, 1992): 157-158.
Kajberg, Leif. “ European LIS Curriculum Project-Developing and E-book as an Integrated Process among 100 Academic Colleagues.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(January 2007):9-15.
Library Association. “Statement on Policy of Education for Librarianship.” Library Association Record 66(August 1964):358-359.
Lorring, Leif. “European LIS Curriculum Project-Content, Reflections and Curricular Questions.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (January 2007):16-20.
MacDougall, Jennifer and Brittain, J. Michael. “Library and Information Science Education in the United Kingdom.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 28(1993):367-378.
McCrossan, J. A. “Schools of Library and Information Science in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Comparison.” Journal of Education Media and Library Science 26:4(1989):316-324.
McGrath,William E. “Explanation and Prediction: Building a Unified Theory of Librarianship Concept and Review.” Library Trends 50:3(Winter 2002):350-370.
Robbins, Carter Jane and Seavey,Charles A. “The Master’s Degree: Basic Preparation for Professional Practice.” Library Trends 34(Spring 1986): 563-565.
Shera, Jesse H. “Librarianship, Documentation and Information Science.” UNESCO Bulletin for Libraries(1986)22:58-65.
The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. “Standards for Library Schools, 1976.” IFLA Journal 2 (1976):212.
(三) 網路資源
65th IFLA Council and General Conference.“Standards for Library Schools, 1976: Update: A Preliminary Report to the Standing Committee on Education and Training, 64th IFLA General Conference, Amsterdam, August 1998.” <http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla65/papers/085-159e.htm> (Retrieved 2008/3/15).
American Library Association. “Accreditation Process Policies & Procedures.”
<http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/accredstandards/ap3.htm#Overview>(Retrieved 2007/9/30).
American Library Association. “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 1992.” <http://eric.ed.gov/RICWebPortal/custom/portlets/
recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_
SearchValue_0=ED358852&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=eric_accno&accno=ED358852>(Retrieved 2007/6/10).
American Library Association. “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 2008.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/accre
dstandards/standards_2008.pdf> (Retrieved 2008/3/
15).
American Library Association. “Overview: Accreditation under the 1992 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 1992.” <http://www. ala.org/alaorg/oa/overview.html>(Retrieved 2007/8/30).
American Library Association. “Accredited Library and Information Studies Masters Programs From 1923 Through.” <Presenthttp://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/
historical/historicallist.htm > (Retrieved 2007/6/10).
American Library Association Committee on Accreditation. “Accreditation Process Policies & Procedures Second Edition, 2006.” <http://www.ala. org/ala/accreditation/accredstandards/AP3_2nd_ Edition_1-15-2007.pdf>(Retrieved 2007/9/30).
American Library Association. “Draft- Statement of Core Competences.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditationb/
Draft_Core_Competencies_07_05.pdf>(Retrieved 2007/10/30).
American Library Association. “Updating the 1992 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/
accreditation/accredstandards/StandardsChangesOver.pdf> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).
American Library Association. “Core Values of Librarianship.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/
statementspols/corevaluesstatement/corevalues.htm> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).
American Library Association. “2007-2008 Directory of Institutions Offering ALA-Accredited Master`s Programs in Library and Information Studies.”
<http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/lisdirb/lisdirectory.cfm#Guidelines> (Retrieved 2007/8/30).
Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. “Procedures for the Accreditation of Courses 2002.” <http://www. la-hq.org.uk/directory/
careers/jai.pdf> (Retrieved 2007/6/10).
Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. “Courses in Library and Information Studies Currently Accredited by CILIP 2007.” <http://www.cilip.org.uk/qualificationschartership/Wheretostudy> (Retrieved 2007/8/30).
Medical Library Association. “The Educational Policy Statement of the Medical Library Association.” < http://mlanet.org/education/platform/index.html> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).
Quality Assurance Agency. “Librarianship and Information Management Quality Assurance Agency 2000.” <http://www.la-hq.org.uk/directory/careers/jai.pdf >(Retrieved 2007/6/10).
Special Libraries Association. “Competencies for Information Professionals of the 21st Century.” <http://www.sla.org/content/learn/comp2003/index.cfm
(Retrieved 2007/10/30).
The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. “Guidelines for Library / Information Educational Programs-2000.”<http://www.ifla.org/VII/
s23/bulletin/guidelines.htm> (Retrieved 2007/6/10).
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
95155002
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095155002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 王梅玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Mei-Lingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡佳縈zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tsai, Chia-Yingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蔡佳縈zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Chia-Yingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Apr-2010 15:30:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Apr-2010 15:30:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Apr-2010 15:30:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0095155002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38736-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95155002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 教育部於2006年委託高等教育評鑑中心統一對全國公私立大學院校進行評鑑,評鑑工作主要以學門為分類單位,目前共分為47個學門,以因應各大學院校系所性質之多樣性,並做為遴聘評鑑委員之依據。高等教育評鑑中心僅依據學門訂定相關參考效標,並未對各專業學科發展相關標準與指南;此外,目前之評鑑作業中,各圖書資訊學系所隸屬於不同學門進行評鑑,不僅難以確保訪視委員之專業背景、各圖書資訊學系所評鑑結果之客觀性,亦使得圖書資訊學教育品質缺乏ㄧ致標準。
面對上述危機,本論文擬研究臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南,使臺灣圖書資訊學之教育評鑑活動具備更健全、更符合系所專業教育發展的衡量基礎架構,提升臺灣圖書資訊學教育品質,亦成為臺灣圖書資訊學教育品質保證依據。
本論文主要參考英美之圖書資訊學教育標準與指南,以及我國相關研究,利用內容分析法訂定臺灣圖書訊學教育指南芻議;再採焦點團體法進行研究,共舉行4場焦點團體討論會,對象分別為圖書資訊學系所教師、圖書資訊學系所主任、圖書資訊學系所研究生與圖書館館員;各場次參與者對圖書資訊學教育指南芻議進行討論,凝聚臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南所應具備之要件與內涵共識。
本研究最後所形成之圖書資訊學教育指南草案共分為圖書資訊學定義與範圍、教育任務與目標、課程、教師團隊、學生、行政管理、教學資源與設施等7大項,27小項,40個分項指標;教育指南草案適用範圍涵蓋大學部、研究所(碩士班、博士班)、專業學程與繼續教育。研究建議包括中華圖書資訊學教育學會舉辦論壇討論草案再行公佈、舉辦圖書資訊學學門意涵與教育工作坊、專案研究圖書資訊學教育評鑑制度、推動圖書資訊學教育評鑑與指南之實施。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In 2006, the Ministry of Education commended the higher education evaluation to Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan. Higher education evaluation divided all universities into 47 colleges, to respond to schools’ variegation and to choose the evaluation members. Higher education evaluation center only sets related guidelines according to different colleges, but doesn’t provide related standards or guidelines to professional disciplines. In addition, library and information science schools are attached to different colleges in current evaluation, and that may cause unfair assessments and impact evaluation results.
Faced with the crises above, this thesis on guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan is to make the educational evaluation of library and information science develop better, fit the professional needs, and enhance the quality of education.
This paper refers library and information science education standards and guidelines of Britain and the United States, as well as related researches in Taiwan. We used the content analysis to develop draft of guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan, and then held four focus group interviews which were aimed at different targets of the Department of Library and Information Science: teachers, directors, students and librarians, to discuss the draft of guidelines and cohere the content and elements of guidelines.
The final form of guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan is divided into 7 parts, including the definition, goals and objectives, curriculum, faulty, students, administration, and physical resources and facilities. There are 27 indicators, and 40 sub-indicators. The guidelines offered here are primarily applied to the undergraduate, graduate(Master classes and PhD), professional programs and continuing education level. Finally, we suggested that the Association of Library and Information Science Education of Republic of China should hold discussion of the guidelines, and other related associations should hold workshops on education of library and information science as well as research in evaluation system of library and information science, and promote the educational evaluation and implementation of library and information science.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機...................................1
第二節 研究目的...................................5
第三節 研究問題...................................5
第四節 研究範圍與限制..............................5
第五節 名詞解釋...................................6

第二章 文獻探討
第一節 圖書資訊學教育意涵..........................9
第二節 圖書館員專業核心能力........................16
第三節 圖書資訊學教育評鑑制度......................21
第四節 圖書資訊學教育標準..........................27

第三章 研究方法與步驟
第一節 研究方法...................................37
第二節 研究對象...................................42
第三節 資料蒐集與分析..............................43
第四節 研究步驟...................................44

第四章 圖書資訊學教育標準指南內容分析
第一節 臺灣圖書資訊學教育現況.......................47
第二節 相關指南與標準..............................49
第三節 定義與範圍..................................55
第四節 教育任務與目標..............................57
第五節 課程.......................................60
第六節 教師.......................................64
第七節 學生.......................................66
第八節 行政管理與財務..............................68
第九節 教學資源與設施..............................71

第五章 焦點團體訪談資料分析
第一節 基本資料...................................77
第二節 圖書資訊學門意涵與指南之定位.................80
第三節 教育任務與目標..............................88
第四節 課程.......................................93
第五節 教師團隊...................................98
第六節 學生......................................101
第七節 行政管理...................................104
第八節 教學資源與設施.............................108
第九節 圖書資訊學教育評鑑.......................... 111
第十節 綜合討論...................................112

第六章 結論與建議
第一節 結論......................................117
第二節 建議......................................127
第三節 未來研究建議...............................128

參考書目
一 中文部份......................................131
二 西文部份......................................133

附錄
附錄一 焦點團體研究邀請函..........................139
附錄二 焦點團體討論議程............................141
附錄三 第一場焦點團體討論紀錄.......................151
附錄四 第二場焦點團體討論紀錄.......................169
附錄五 第三場焦點團體討論紀錄.......................183
附錄六 第四場焦點團體討論紀錄.......................197
附錄七
American Library Association. Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies 2008.
......................................................209
附錄八 International Federation of Library Associations. Guidelines for Professional Library / Information Educational Programs 2000.
......................................................219
附錄九Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. Procedures for the Accreditation of Courses 2002.
......................................................225
附錄十Quality Assurance Agency. Librarianship and Information Management 2000.
......................................................239

表目次
表4-1 定義與範圍芻議............................57
表4-2 教育任務與目標芻議 .........................59
表4-3 課程芻議..................................63
表4-4 教師芻議..................................65
表4-5 學生芻議..................................68
表4-6 行政管理與財務芻議.........................70
表4-7 教學資源與設施芻議 .........................72
表5-1 焦點團體成員基本資料表......................77
表5-2 焦點團體成員基本資料分析表..................78
表5-3 教育適用範圍統計表.........................86
表5-4 教育指南要件統計表.........................86
表5-5 圖書資訊學領域隸屬學門統計表................87
表5-6 定義與範圍指南草案.........................87
表5-7 教育任務與目標指南芻議認同度統計表...........90
表5-8 教育任務與目標指南草案......................91
表5-9 課程結構指南芻議認同度統計表.................95
表5-10 核心課程指南芻議認同度統計表.................95
表5-11 課程指南草案...............................96
表5-12 教師指南芻議認同度統計表....................99
表5-13 教師團隊指南草案..........................100
表5-14 學生指南芻議認同度統計表...................102
表5-15 學生指南草案..............................103
表5-16 行政管理與財務指南芻議認同度統計表...........105
表5-17 行政管理指南草案...........................107
表5-18 教學資源與設施指南芻議認同度統計表...........109
表5-19 教學資源與設施指南草案......................110
表5-20 指南標準架構比較表 .........................113

圖目次

圖3-1 研究架構圖.................................42
圖3-2 研究流程圖.................................45
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 96341 bytes-
dc.format.extent 128166 bytes-
dc.format.extent 124490 bytes-
dc.format.extent 117479 bytes-
dc.format.extent 197065 bytes-
dc.format.extent 313359 bytes-
dc.format.extent 235631 bytes-
dc.format.extent 344937 bytes-
dc.format.extent 320909 bytes-
dc.format.extent 217618 bytes-
dc.format.extent 167246 bytes-
dc.format.extent 553155 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095155002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 圖書資訊學教育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 圖書資訊學教育評鑑zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 圖書資訊學教育指南zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南建構之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Developing Guidelines for Library and Information Science Educational Programs in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (一) 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krueger, Richard A.著;洪志成、廖梅花譯。焦點團體訪談。嘉義市:濤石文化,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stewart, David W.等著;歐素汝譯。焦點團體:理論與實務。臺北市:弘智文化,民88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 丁友貞。美國圖書館學教育認可制度之探討。台北市:漢美圖書有限公司,民83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。英美圖書館與資訊科學碩士教育之比較研究。臺北市:漢美圖書,民85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。臺北市:文華圖書管理,民94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。中華民國九十二年圖書館年鑑。臺北市:國家圖書館,民92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。二十一世紀我國學術圖書館館員應具備的知識與技能的研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,民90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李德竹。資訊科學與圖書館學。台北市:文華圖書館理,民89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡述兆、吳祖善合著。圖書館學導論。臺北市:漢美,民78。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡述兆。圖書資訊學導論。台北市:漢美,民94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周寧森。圖書資訊學導論。台北市:三民書局,民80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡述兆主編。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北:國立編譯館,民84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 柯雲娥。「傳播學門大學生資訊素養能力的研究」。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,碩士論文,民93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳雪華。教育部人文社會科學第三期中成教育改進計畫—圖書資訊學門規劃報告。台北市:臺灣大學圖書資訊學系,民88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇錦麗。高等教育評鑑:理論與實務。臺北市:五南,民86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (二) 期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。「圖書資訊學教育標準之探討」。中國圖書館學會會報63期(民88年12月):105-118。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。「從教育標準探討圖書資訊學核心課程」。圖書與資訊季刊61期(民96年5月):57-74。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。「圖書資訊學教育之評鑑」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊16期(民90年6月):3-9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲。「臺灣圖書館教育史(1954-2007年)」。臺灣圖書館事業與教育史研討會論文集(民96年5月):67-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李德竹。「教育部和本系新修訂之圖書館學必修課程」。書府11期:7-8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李德竹、莊道明。「圖書館學與資訊科學課程革新之探討」。資訊傳播與圖館學4:1(民86年9月):17-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱子恆。「美國地區圖書資訊學教育之認可制度」。國立中央圖書館台灣分館館刊6:6 (民89年12月):8-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡述兆、王梅玲。「英美圖書資訊學碩士教育之比較」。圖書館學與資訊科zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 學20:2(民83年10月):40-63。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳美美。「重新定義圖書館與圖書資訊學」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊19期(民91):10-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高博銓。「教育研究法:焦點團體訪談法」。教育研究月刊103期(民91):101-110。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳雪華等。「圖書館學系核心課程之規劃研究」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 會訊 12期(民88年6月):1-6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊美華。「圖書館學碩士教育之檢討與展望」。中國圖書館學會會報58期(民86年6月):27-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊美華。「我國圖書資訊學教育的省思」。圖書館學與資訊科學30:2(民93 年10月):46-58。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡明月。「從圖書館與資訊科學的遞嬗反省圖書館的定義」。圖書館新定義(民94):64。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧秀菊。「談圖書館學與資訊科學教育大學部學程及學科專長問題」。圖書與資訊學刊 23期(民86年11月):1-8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (三) 網路資源zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高等教育中心。「系所評鑑介紹」。<http://www.heeact.org.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年9月18日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盛杏湲。「焦點團體法」。 <http://www.scenariolab.com.tw/project/pfn/ upload/%E7%84%A6%E9%BB%9E%E5%9C%98%E9%AB%94%E6% B3%95-%E7%9B%9B%E6%95%99%E6%8E%88.pdf >(檢索日期:2007年12月5日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉維琪。「維基式評鑑,彌補現行評鑑制度盲點」。 <http://news.sina.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) edu/cna/tw/2007-09-03/141612687459.shtml> (檢索日期:2007年9月18日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「台師大等11系所評鑑結果」。 <http://news.sina.com.tw/edu/cna/tw/2007-09-03/141612687459.shtml> (檢索日期:2007年9月18日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「私立世新大學資訊傳播學系」。<http://ic.shu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「世新大學資訊傳播學系課程規劃」。<http://ic.shu.edu.tw/index.php? code=list&ids=13&menu_id=15 > (檢索日期:2008年3月1日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「私立玄奘大學圖書資訊學系」。<http://www.hcu.edu.tw/hcu3/content/ lis01/content/act/act01.asp?sn=10>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「私立淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系所」。<http://www.dils.tku.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「私立輔仁大學圖書資訊學系所」。<http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「輔仁大學文學院中國古籍整理學程」。 <http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/ lins/portal/main.html> (檢索日期:2008年3月1日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所」。<http://www.nchu.edu.tw/~gilis/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所」。<http://www.lias.nccu.edu.tw/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系所」。<http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系」。<http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/ace/>(檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所」。<http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/GLIS/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「國立交通大學電機學院/資訊學院在職專班數位圖書資訊組」。<http://dlp.lib.nctu.edu.tw/> (檢索日期:2007年8月31日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「國立臺灣大學知識管理學程修習辦法」。<http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期:2008年3月1日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 西文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (一) 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science. Chicago: American Library Association, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ALA Glossary of Library Terms. Chicago: American Library Association, 1943.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. Standards for Accreditation, 1951. Chicago: American Library Association, 1951.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. Standards for Accreditation, 1972. Chicago:American Library Association, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bramley, Gerald. A History of Library Education in the United Kindom. London: Bingley, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carroll, C Edward. The Professionalization of Education for Librarianship. Metuchen, N.J. : Scarecrow Press, 1970.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dalkey, Norman C. Predicting the Future. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.,Oct. 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) David, Lim. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Study of Developing Countries. Hants: Ashgate, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Doyle, Christina S. Development of a Model of Information Literacy Outcome Measures With National Education Goals of 1990. Ph. D.Theses, Northern Arizona University, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. The Program Evaluation Standards. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) John Richardson. The State of Library and Information Science Education. Greenwich, CO: JAI Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, D. British Librarianship and Information Work 1981-1985. London: Library Association, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Josephine Yu Chen Sche. Education Systems for Librarianship in the Federal Republic of Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States of America: A Comparative Study. Ph. D. diss., University of Florida State University, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) John S Brubacher. Education For the Professionals: The Sixty-first Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Library Advisory Council and Library Advisory Council. A Report on the Supply and Training of Librarians. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Library Association. Procedures for the Approval of Course at Full-Time School of Librarianship in the United Kingdom. London: Library Association, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lilly,D.B. and Trice, R.W. A History of Information Science, 1945-1985. New York: Academic Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morgan, David L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series 16. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub., 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nasri, William Z. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Vol. 7eds. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Philip. Whiteman. Public libraries since 1945 : the impact of the McColvin report. London : C. Bingley, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quality Assurance Agenc. Final Phase 1 Subject Standards Statement in 22 Subjects. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quality Assurance Agenc. Final Phase 2 Subject Standards Statement in 25 Subjects. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rossi,P. H. and Freeman, H. E. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schur, H. and Saunders, W. L. Education and Training for Scientific and Technological Library and Information Work. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shera, Jesse H. Introduction to Library Science. Littelton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shera, Jesse H. The Foundations of Education for Librarianship. New York: Becker and Hayes, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stewart, David W. Shamdasani, Prem N. Rook, Dennis W. Focus groups : theory and practice. Thousand Oaks : SAGE Publications, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swan, J. Developing a New Quality Assurance Model for Higher Education: Update on Trials. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tylaor, Robert S. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1966.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williamson, Charles C. Training for Library Service: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Boston, MA: The Merrimount Press, 1923.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) World encyclopedia of library and information services. Chicago : American Library Association, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Young, Kenneth E. Understanding Accreditation. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yu Chen, Josephine. Education Systems for Librarianship in the Federal Republic of Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. PhD. Thesis: Florida State University, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (二) 期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borko, H. “ Information Science: What is it?” American Documentation 19 (January 1968):3-4.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bush,V. “As We may Think.” Atlantic Monthly176:1(1945):101-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Diljit Singh. “Accreditation of Library and Information Science Education Programs: The Malaysian Experience.” The 2ed International Conference on Asia-Pacific Library and Information Education and Practice (2007):87-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holley, Edward G. “One Hundred Years of Progress: The Growth and Development of Library Education.” The ALA Yearbook of Library and Information Services11(1986):23-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hurt, C.D. “The Future of Library Science in Higher Education:A Crossroads for Library Science and Librarianship.” Advances in Librarianship (New York : Academic Press, 1992): 157-158.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kajberg, Leif. “ European LIS Curriculum Project-Developing and E-book as an Integrated Process among 100 Academic Colleagues.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(January 2007):9-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Library Association. “Statement on Policy of Education for Librarianship.” Library Association Record 66(August 1964):358-359.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lorring, Leif. “European LIS Curriculum Project-Content, Reflections and Curricular Questions.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (January 2007):16-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MacDougall, Jennifer and Brittain, J. Michael. “Library and Information Science Education in the United Kingdom.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 28(1993):367-378.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCrossan, J. A. “Schools of Library and Information Science in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Comparison.” Journal of Education Media and Library Science 26:4(1989):316-324.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McGrath,William E. “Explanation and Prediction: Building a Unified Theory of Librarianship Concept and Review.” Library Trends 50:3(Winter 2002):350-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robbins, Carter Jane and Seavey,Charles A. “The Master’s Degree: Basic Preparation for Professional Practice.” Library Trends 34(Spring 1986): 563-565.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shera, Jesse H. “Librarianship, Documentation and Information Science.” UNESCO Bulletin for Libraries(1986)22:58-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. “Standards for Library Schools, 1976.” IFLA Journal 2 (1976):212.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (三) 網路資源zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 65th IFLA Council and General Conference.“Standards for Library Schools, 1976: Update: A Preliminary Report to the Standing Committee on Education and Training, 64th IFLA General Conference, Amsterdam, August 1998.” <http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla65/papers/085-159e.htm> (Retrieved 2008/3/15).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Accreditation Process Policies & Procedures.”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/accredstandards/ap3.htm#Overview>(Retrieved 2007/9/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 1992.” <http://eric.ed.gov/RICWebPortal/custom/portlets/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) SearchValue_0=ED358852&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=eric_accno&accno=ED358852>(Retrieved 2007/6/10).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 2008.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/accrezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) dstandards/standards_2008.pdf> (Retrieved 2008/3/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Overview: Accreditation under the 1992 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 1992.” <http://www. ala.org/alaorg/oa/overview.html>(Retrieved 2007/8/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Accredited Library and Information Studies Masters Programs From 1923 Through.” <Presenthttp://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) historical/historicallist.htm > (Retrieved 2007/6/10).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association Committee on Accreditation. “Accreditation Process Policies & Procedures Second Edition, 2006.” <http://www.ala. org/ala/accreditation/accredstandards/AP3_2nd_ Edition_1-15-2007.pdf>(Retrieved 2007/9/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Draft- Statement of Core Competences.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditationb/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Draft_Core_Competencies_07_05.pdf>(Retrieved 2007/10/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Updating the 1992 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) accreditation/accredstandards/StandardsChangesOver.pdf> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “Core Values of Librarianship.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) statementspols/corevaluesstatement/corevalues.htm> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Library Association. “2007-2008 Directory of Institutions Offering ALA-Accredited Master`s Programs in Library and Information Studies.”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/lisdirb/lisdirectory.cfm#Guidelines> (Retrieved 2007/8/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. “Procedures for the Accreditation of Courses 2002.” <http://www. la-hq.org.uk/directory/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) careers/jai.pdf> (Retrieved 2007/6/10).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. “Courses in Library and Information Studies Currently Accredited by CILIP 2007.” <http://www.cilip.org.uk/qualificationschartership/Wheretostudy> (Retrieved 2007/8/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Medical Library Association. “The Educational Policy Statement of the Medical Library Association.” < http://mlanet.org/education/platform/index.html> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quality Assurance Agency. “Librarianship and Information Management Quality Assurance Agency 2000.” <http://www.la-hq.org.uk/directory/careers/jai.pdf >(Retrieved 2007/6/10).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Special Libraries Association. “Competencies for Information Professionals of the 21st Century.” <http://www.sla.org/content/learn/comp2003/index.cfmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Retrieved 2007/10/30).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. “Guidelines for Library / Information Educational Programs-2000.”<http://www.ifla.org/VII/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) s23/bulletin/guidelines.htm> (Retrieved 2007/6/10).zh_TW