Publications-Theses

題名 建構原住民族傳統領域制度之研究
作者 張則民
貢獻者 顏愛靜
張則民
關鍵詞 原住民
土地
傳統領域
制度
日期 2007
上傳時間 9-Apr-2010 18:33:51 (UTC+8)
摘要 自原住民族基本法2005年2月5日公布施行以來,原住民族傳統領域土地一直為國內各界熱衷討論及研究之議題,其中包含應用PPGIS技術整合原住民集體記憶轉繪為部落地圖,以及從共管面向探討原住民地區內自然資源管理模式等多方論述;而政府在面臨原住民族訴求土地權利返還主張之時,也總是以由上而下式的思考模式框限原住民族土地之發展空間,形成政策制度與原住民社會期待間之落差,近日司馬庫斯風倒櫸木事件適為此現象之最佳例證。
本文爰以多元文化主義、自然主權及生物多樣性為論述基礎,參酌加拿大處理原住民族主張土地權利之長久且成效豐碩經驗,釐清未來原住民族傳統領域制度建立時所遭遇基本內涵、形成步驟、產權型態及衝突解決途徑等四面向問題徵點。研究結果顯示,應以部落為主體及土地使用關係作為傳統領域之劃設準據,並採用協商合作方式作為調查處理的基本制度模式,而傳統領域產權制度則以部落共有制為核心基礎,至於關於傳統領域問題如何解決,需成立中立爭議調處機構衡平協調處理。
The indigenous tradition territory has been a hot subject of discussion and research all over the country since the Indigenous Fundamental Law was promulgated and enforced On February 5, 2005; the study orientation includes that using the PPGIS technology to integrate the indigenous collective memory extends the tribe map, as well as based on the condominium spirit discusses the natural resource management pattern in the original resident area. However, when dealing with the request made by the indigenous of returning land right, government uses a top-down thinking mode to limit the indigenous land development, which causes the gap between the policy institution and the indigenous society expectation; a perfect example is the recently incident regarding stealing trees blew down by typhoon in Marcus.
This article takes the multicultural principle, the natural sovereignty and the biodiversity as the elaboration foundation, and also refers to the Canadian long-term and great experiences of dealing with the issue concerning the indigenous land right, in order to clarify four questions, basic connotation, the step of formation, the type of property right and the solution of conflict, encountered when the indigenous tradition territory establishes domain system in the future. The findings showed that we should consider the tribe a main body, delimit the traditional domain based on the land use relation, and select a consultative cooperation method as the basic system mode of investigation. Moreover, the traditional domain property right system takes the tribe co-owned institution as the core foundation. As to solutions of indigenous traditional domain, we should set up a neutral organization to mediate those disputes objectivity.
參考文獻 中文部分
Chief Seattle.著,李毓昭譯,2004,『西雅圖酋長的智慧:印地安酋長的自然與土地宣言』,台北:晨星。
Furubotn E. G. and Richter, R.合著,顏愛靜主譯,2001,『制度與經濟理論-新制度經濟學之貢獻』,台北:五南。
North, D. C.著,劉瑞華譯,1995,『經濟史的結構與變遷』,台北:時報文化。
Reynolds, H.著,陳茂泰校譯,2001,『原住民族主權:對種族、國家及國族的深思』,台北:行政院原住民族委員會。
Tully, J.著,黃俊龍譯,2001,『陌生的多樣性:歧異時代的憲政主義』,台北:聯經。
王躍生,1997,『新制度主義』,台北:揚智文化。
林佳陵,1996,「論關於臺灣原住民土地之統治政策與法令」,國立台灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。
林俊強,2005,「原住民族傳統領域之研究—泰雅族司馬庫斯個案」,國立台灣大學地理環境資源研究所博士論文。
林瓊華,1997,「台灣原住民土地產權之演變:1624∼1945」,私立東吳大學經濟學研究所博士論文。
林淑雅,2000,『第一國族:台灣原住民族運動的憲法意義』,台北:前衛。
汪明輝,1992,「Hupa:阿里山鄒族傳統的領域」,『師大地理研究報告』(18):1-52。
吳豪人,1989,「山地政策立法實體內容初探」,『國家政策研究季刊』(4):80-101
吳樹欉,2000,「台灣原住民族土地財產權制度變遷之研究-日治時期迄今從共同所有到個別所有的演變」,國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。
邱國民,1995,「鄒族傳統的地權結構與轉化過程-以阿里山達邦社的發展為中心」,國立政治大學民族研究所碩士論文。
紀駿傑,1988,「環境殖民︰資本主義擴張下的台灣原住民土地與資源權」,『原住民土地與文化學術研討會論文集』:8.1-8.23;中國土地經濟學會。
紀駿傑,2001,「原住民、自然資源與共同經營」,『把人找回來─在地參與自然資源管理』。
官大偉,2002,「原住民保留地共有制施行基礎—公共資源自主治理模式的研究:以新竹縣尖石鄉個案為例」,國立政治大學民族學系碩士論文。
洪廣冀,2004,「林野利權、人群分類與族群:以蘭陽溪中上游地域為中心(1890s-1930s)」,『宜蘭研究第六屆學術研討會-族群與文化』,宜蘭:宜蘭縣史館。
洪廣冀、林俊強,2003,「社群主位與資源競合—泰雅爾司馬庫斯部落觀光經營制度的浮現與變遷」,『環境教育學術研討會』,花蓮:東華大學。
城忠志,2003,「台灣原住民保留地劃設保留區之研究—高雄縣桃源鄉的個案分析」,國立政治大學民族學系碩士論文。
徐世榮,1997,「歷史上台灣原住民土地流失之政治經濟分析」,『原住民土地與文化學術研討會』,台北:中國土地經濟學會。
原住民文教基金會,1998,『跨世紀原住民政策白皮書』,台北:財團法人台灣原住民文教基金會。
高德義,1997,『跨世紀原住民政策藍圖之研究-政治篇』,台北:台灣原住民文化基金會。
陳松造,1997,「公共建設土地取得與補償機制之研究」,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
陳秋坤,1994,『清代台灣土著地權—官僚、漢佃與岸裡社人的土地變遷1700-1895』,台北:中研院近史所。
陳茂泰,1975,「從旱田到果園:道澤與卡母界農業經濟變遷的調適」,『中央研究院民族學研究所集刊』(36):11-33。
陳舜伶,1998,「還我土地-法律體系變動下的原住民土地流失與土地權利」,台大法律系專題研究成果報告。
梁煒智,2000,「百年來臺灣原住民族土地分配制度的變遷與國家法令」,國立台灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。
馬淵東一,1973,「山地高砂族、地理知識、社會、政治組織」,東京:社會思想社。
張長義、伊凡諾幹、汪明輝、林益仁、紀駿傑、陳毅峰、孫志鴻、裴家騏、蔡博文、關華山,2002,「原住民族傳統土地與傳統領域調查研究」,台大地理環境資源學系,台北:行政院原住民族委員會,
黃振德,1994,「農業發展條例立法決策過程之研究-新制度經濟學之應用」,台灣大學農業經濟研究所博士論文。
黃富三,1981,「清代臺灣移民的耕地取得問題及其對土著的影響(上)」,『食貨』》(11-1):19-36。
黃富三,1981,「清代臺灣移民的耕地取得問題及其對土著的影響(下)」,『食貨』》(11-2):26-46。
黃應貴,1993 ,「東埔社土地制度之演變:一個台灣中部布農族聚落的研究」及「光復後高山族的經濟變遷」,『台灣土著 社會文化研究論文集』,台北:聯經。
溫豐文,1984,「現代社會與土地所有權理論之發展」,『中國地政研究所四十週年紀念叢書(七),台北:中國地政研究所。
楊松齡,1992,「財產權保障與公用徵收補償之研究」,『經社法治論叢』(9):259-278。
衛惠林1965,「台灣土著社會的部落組織與威權制度」,『考古人類學刊』:25-26,台北:國立台灣大學。
衛惠林,1986,「台灣土著社會的部落組織與權威制度」,『台灣土著社會文化研究論文集』,台北:聯經。
盧道杰,2001,「參與式自然資源管理與部落地圖,把人找回來—在地參與自然資源管理」:101-120,花蓮:太魯閣國家公園管理處。
顏愛靜,1997,「原住民保留地與公有土地資源管理制度之研究(I)」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
顏愛靜,1999,「原住民保留地與公有土地資源管理制度之研究(II)」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
顏愛靜,1999,「原住民保留地與公有土地資源管理制度之研究(Ⅲ)」,行政院國科會專案研究計畫。
顏愛靜,1999,『臺灣地區原住民保留地制度變遷之研究』,台北:行政院原住民委員會。
顏愛靜、楊國柱,2004,『原住民族土地制度與經濟發展』,台北:稻香出版社。
顏愛靜、官大偉,2004,「傳統制度與制度選擇—新竹縣尖石鄉兩個泰雅族部落土地資源自主治理案例分析」、『地理學報』(37):27-49。
顏愛靜,2005,「原住民族土地及海域法與原住民族土地調查及處理委員會組織法之研究」,台北:行政院原住民族委員會。
邊泰明,1997,「限制發展土地之補償策略與財產權配置」,『土地經濟年刊』(8)期:154-168。

二、外文部分
Anaya, S. J., 1996, Indigenous Peoples in International Law. New York : Oxford University Press.
Bass, S. Barry, D. C. and Jules P., 1995, Participation in strategies for sustainable development. International Institute for Environment and Development, (IIED), UK.
Berkes, F., 1999, Sacred Ecology – Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management, Taylor & Francis, USA.
Burger, Julian., 1991, Indigenous Peoples: New Rights for Old Wrongs in Peter Davies (ed.), Human Rights, The United Nations.
Bystydzienski, J. and Schancht, S. eds., 2001, Forging radical alliances acrossdifference: coalition politics for the new millennium, Colo: Rowman & Littlefield.
Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A.D., 1972, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: On View of the Cathedral, Harvard Law Review, 85(6).
Cernea, M. M., 1985, Putting people first – sociological variables in rural development. Published for the World Bank, Oxford University Press.
Daes, Erica-Irene A, 2001a, Indigenous Peoples and their relationship to land, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/21.
Daes, Erica-Irene A, 2001b, Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Indigenous Peoples Report of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations on its nineteenth session, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/17.
Demsetz, H., 1967, Toward a Theory of Property Rights, American Economic Review , 57: 347- 59.
Durning, Alan Thein. 1992, Guardians of the Land: Indigenous Peoples and the Health of the Earth. Worldwatch Paper 112. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.
Escobar, 1998, Whose knowledge, whose nature? biodiversity, conservation, and political ecology of social movement, Journal of Political Ecology, 5: 53- 82.
Giordano, M., 2003, The Geography of the Commons: The Role of Scale andSpace, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2): 365- 375.
Guibernau, M., 1999, Nations without States:Political Community in a Global Age.Malden:BlackWell.113
Gutmann, A., 1994, Introduction, in Amy Gutmann, ed, Multiculturalism,: 3-24. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kohn, H., 1968, International Encyclopedia of the Social Science, Nationalism, in David L. Sills Ed.
Konig, M., 1999, Cultural Diversity and Language Policy, International Social Science Journal, 51(161).
Kymlicka, W., 1998, Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press.
Larsen, S. C., 2003, Promoting aboriginal territoriality through interethnic alliance: the case of the Cheslatta T`en in Northern British Columbia, Human Organization, 63(1): 74- 84.
Lerner, Natan. 1991, Groups Rights and Discrimination in Interna- tional Law. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Long D. and Dickason, O., 2000, Visions of the heart: Candian aboriginal issues. 2nd ed., Toronto: Harcourt Canada.
McNeely, J. A., K. R. Miller, W. V. Reid, R. A. Mittermeier and T. B. Werner. 1990, Conserving the World_s Biological Diversity., INCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Mohamed, M. and Ventura, S., 2000, Use of geomatics for mapping and documenting indigenous tenure systems, Society and Natural Resources, 13: 223- 236.
Nesti, Lorenzo, 1999, Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Land: International Standards and Possible Developments.
Nichols, S. and Rakai, M., 2001., Land Reform Canadian Style: An Overview of Aboriginal Rights and Land Claims Settlements. Land Reform Bulletin, Issue 2001/1, FAO, Rome.
North, D. C., 1981, Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: W. W. Norton.
North, D. C., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C., 1994, Economic performance through time, Alfred Nobel memorial prize lecture in economic science, American Economic Review, 84: 359- 368.
Ostrom, E., 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Parekh, B., 2000, Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
Peet, R. and Watts, M. eds., 1996, Liberation ecologies: environment, development,social movement, New York: Routledge.
Reynold, A. N., 2001, Studies in Islamic Mysticism, New York: Routledge.
Shih, C. F., 1991, A Multivariate Model of Ethnic Diversity and Violent Political Behavior, Ph.D dissertation. Department of Political Science, the Ohio State University.
Smith D. A., 1983, Theories of Nationalism, New York: Holmes&Meier.
Smith D. A., 1995, Nations and Nationalism in Global Era, Cambridge: Polity.
Snyder, L. L., 1982, Global Mini-Nationalisms-Autonomy or Independence, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
Sparke, M., 1998, A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, andthe narration of nation, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88:463- 495.
Steiner, H., 1998, Territorial Justice, Theories of Secession. London:Routledge.
Tang, C. P. and Tang, S. Y., 2001, Negotiated autonomy : transforming self-governing. institutions for local common-pool resources in tribal villages in Taiwan, Human Ecology, 29(1): 49-67.
Taylor, C. and Gutmann, A, 1994, Multiculturalism:Examining the Politics of Recognition ,New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Tully, J., 2000, The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom, in Duncan Ivison, Paul Patton, and Will Sanders, eds. Political History and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, :36-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United Nation Economic and Social Council, 2001, Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Indigenous People and Minoruties.
Walker, P. and Peters, P., 2001, Maps, metaphors, and meanings: boundary struggles and village forest use on private and state land in Malawi, Society and Natural Resources, 14: 411- 424.
Warren, K., 1998, Indigenous movements and their critics: Pan- Maya activism in Guatemala. Princeton.
Webster, C. and Lai, W. C., 2003, Property right, Planning and Markets-Managing Spontaneous Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wilmer, F., 1993, The Indigenous Voice in World Politics, California: Sage.
Wilson, E. O., 1992, The Diversity of Life, Cambridge. Mass., USA:Harvard University Press.
Zazueta, A., 1995, Policy hits the ground: participation and equity in environmental policy-making. USA: World Resources Institute.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
93923007
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093923007
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 顏愛靜zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張則民zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 張則民zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Apr-2010 18:33:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Apr-2010 18:33:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Apr-2010 18:33:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093923007en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38838-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93923007zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 自原住民族基本法2005年2月5日公布施行以來,原住民族傳統領域土地一直為國內各界熱衷討論及研究之議題,其中包含應用PPGIS技術整合原住民集體記憶轉繪為部落地圖,以及從共管面向探討原住民地區內自然資源管理模式等多方論述;而政府在面臨原住民族訴求土地權利返還主張之時,也總是以由上而下式的思考模式框限原住民族土地之發展空間,形成政策制度與原住民社會期待間之落差,近日司馬庫斯風倒櫸木事件適為此現象之最佳例證。
本文爰以多元文化主義、自然主權及生物多樣性為論述基礎,參酌加拿大處理原住民族主張土地權利之長久且成效豐碩經驗,釐清未來原住民族傳統領域制度建立時所遭遇基本內涵、形成步驟、產權型態及衝突解決途徑等四面向問題徵點。研究結果顯示,應以部落為主體及土地使用關係作為傳統領域之劃設準據,並採用協商合作方式作為調查處理的基本制度模式,而傳統領域產權制度則以部落共有制為核心基礎,至於關於傳統領域問題如何解決,需成立中立爭議調處機構衡平協調處理。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The indigenous tradition territory has been a hot subject of discussion and research all over the country since the Indigenous Fundamental Law was promulgated and enforced On February 5, 2005; the study orientation includes that using the PPGIS technology to integrate the indigenous collective memory extends the tribe map, as well as based on the condominium spirit discusses the natural resource management pattern in the original resident area. However, when dealing with the request made by the indigenous of returning land right, government uses a top-down thinking mode to limit the indigenous land development, which causes the gap between the policy institution and the indigenous society expectation; a perfect example is the recently incident regarding stealing trees blew down by typhoon in Marcus.
This article takes the multicultural principle, the natural sovereignty and the biodiversity as the elaboration foundation, and also refers to the Canadian long-term and great experiences of dealing with the issue concerning the indigenous land right, in order to clarify four questions, basic connotation, the step of formation, the type of property right and the solution of conflict, encountered when the indigenous tradition territory establishes domain system in the future. The findings showed that we should consider the tribe a main body, delimit the traditional domain based on the land use relation, and select a consultative cooperation method as the basic system mode of investigation. Moreover, the traditional domain property right system takes the tribe co-owned institution as the core foundation. As to solutions of indigenous traditional domain, we should set up a neutral organization to mediate those disputes objectivity.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的
第二節 研究範圍與內容
第三節 研究方法與流程
第二章 原住民族傳統領域相關議題之研究
第一節 恢復傳統領域立論基礎
第二節 原住民族傳統領域論述研究
第三節 傳統領域調查與部落地圖繪製
第三章 我國原住民保留地制度形成之歷程
第一節 日治時期緣起理蕃政策之高砂族保留地制度
第二節 光復後推展山地行政之原住民保留地制度
第三節 政府因應還我土地運動之增、劃編保留地
第四節 新夥伴關係下之原住民族傳統領域土地
第五節 小結
第四章 加拿大原住族土地權利賦予與制度模式
第一節 背景概述
第二節 原住民族土地權利之發展進程
第三節 原住民族土地權利主張處理過程
第四節 現代衝突之轉變
第五節 小結
第五章 我國原住民族傳統領域制度安排及分析
第一節 原住民族傳統領域內涵
第二節 原住民族傳統領域制度形成
第三節 原住民族傳統領域產權型態
第四節 衝突形式與解決途徑
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 結論
第二節 建議
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 94410 bytes-
dc.format.extent 136370 bytes-
dc.format.extent 139888 bytes-
dc.format.extent 143560 bytes-
dc.format.extent 274929 bytes-
dc.format.extent 382291 bytes-
dc.format.extent 454452 bytes-
dc.format.extent 395366 bytes-
dc.format.extent 419843 bytes-
dc.format.extent 230916 bytes-
dc.format.extent 252482 bytes-
dc.format.extent 213414 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093923007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 原住民zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 土地zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 傳統領域zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 建構原住民族傳統領域制度之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chief Seattle.著,李毓昭譯,2004,『西雅圖酋長的智慧:印地安酋長的自然與土地宣言』,台北:晨星。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Furubotn E. G. and Richter, R.合著,顏愛靜主譯,2001,『制度與經濟理論-新制度經濟學之貢獻』,台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) North, D. C.著,劉瑞華譯,1995,『經濟史的結構與變遷』,台北:時報文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reynolds, H.著,陳茂泰校譯,2001,『原住民族主權:對種族、國家及國族的深思』,台北:行政院原住民族委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tully, J.著,黃俊龍譯,2001,『陌生的多樣性:歧異時代的憲政主義』,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王躍生,1997,『新制度主義』,台北:揚智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林佳陵,1996,「論關於臺灣原住民土地之統治政策與法令」,國立台灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林俊強,2005,「原住民族傳統領域之研究—泰雅族司馬庫斯個案」,國立台灣大學地理環境資源研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林瓊華,1997,「台灣原住民土地產權之演變:1624∼1945」,私立東吳大學經濟學研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林淑雅,2000,『第一國族:台灣原住民族運動的憲法意義』,台北:前衛。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 汪明輝,1992,「Hupa:阿里山鄒族傳統的領域」,『師大地理研究報告』(18):1-52。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳豪人,1989,「山地政策立法實體內容初探」,『國家政策研究季刊』(4):80-101zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳樹欉,2000,「台灣原住民族土地財產權制度變遷之研究-日治時期迄今從共同所有到個別所有的演變」,國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱國民,1995,「鄒族傳統的地權結構與轉化過程-以阿里山達邦社的發展為中心」,國立政治大學民族研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 紀駿傑,1988,「環境殖民︰資本主義擴張下的台灣原住民土地與資源權」,『原住民土地與文化學術研討會論文集』:8.1-8.23;中國土地經濟學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 紀駿傑,2001,「原住民、自然資源與共同經營」,『把人找回來─在地參與自然資源管理』。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 官大偉,2002,「原住民保留地共有制施行基礎—公共資源自主治理模式的研究:以新竹縣尖石鄉個案為例」,國立政治大學民族學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪廣冀,2004,「林野利權、人群分類與族群:以蘭陽溪中上游地域為中心(1890s-1930s)」,『宜蘭研究第六屆學術研討會-族群與文化』,宜蘭:宜蘭縣史館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪廣冀、林俊強,2003,「社群主位與資源競合—泰雅爾司馬庫斯部落觀光經營制度的浮現與變遷」,『環境教育學術研討會』,花蓮:東華大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 城忠志,2003,「台灣原住民保留地劃設保留區之研究—高雄縣桃源鄉的個案分析」,國立政治大學民族學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐世榮,1997,「歷史上台灣原住民土地流失之政治經濟分析」,『原住民土地與文化學術研討會』,台北:中國土地經濟學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 原住民文教基金會,1998,『跨世紀原住民政策白皮書』,台北:財團法人台灣原住民文教基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高德義,1997,『跨世紀原住民政策藍圖之研究-政治篇』,台北:台灣原住民文化基金會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳松造,1997,「公共建設土地取得與補償機制之研究」,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳秋坤,1994,『清代台灣土著地權—官僚、漢佃與岸裡社人的土地變遷1700-1895』,台北:中研院近史所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳茂泰,1975,「從旱田到果園:道澤與卡母界農業經濟變遷的調適」,『中央研究院民族學研究所集刊』(36):11-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳舜伶,1998,「還我土地-法律體系變動下的原住民土地流失與土地權利」,台大法律系專題研究成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁煒智,2000,「百年來臺灣原住民族土地分配制度的變遷與國家法令」,國立台灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬淵東一,1973,「山地高砂族、地理知識、社會、政治組織」,東京:社會思想社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張長義、伊凡諾幹、汪明輝、林益仁、紀駿傑、陳毅峰、孫志鴻、裴家騏、蔡博文、關華山,2002,「原住民族傳統土地與傳統領域調查研究」,台大地理環境資源學系,台北:行政院原住民族委員會,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃振德,1994,「農業發展條例立法決策過程之研究-新制度經濟學之應用」,台灣大學農業經濟研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃富三,1981,「清代臺灣移民的耕地取得問題及其對土著的影響(上)」,『食貨』》(11-1):19-36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃富三,1981,「清代臺灣移民的耕地取得問題及其對土著的影響(下)」,『食貨』》(11-2):26-46。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃應貴,1993 ,「東埔社土地制度之演變:一個台灣中部布農族聚落的研究」及「光復後高山族的經濟變遷」,『台灣土著 社會文化研究論文集』,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溫豐文,1984,「現代社會與土地所有權理論之發展」,『中國地政研究所四十週年紀念叢書(七),台北:中國地政研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊松齡,1992,「財產權保障與公用徵收補償之研究」,『經社法治論叢』(9):259-278。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 衛惠林1965,「台灣土著社會的部落組織與威權制度」,『考古人類學刊』:25-26,台北:國立台灣大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 衛惠林,1986,「台灣土著社會的部落組織與權威制度」,『台灣土著社會文化研究論文集』,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧道杰,2001,「參與式自然資源管理與部落地圖,把人找回來—在地參與自然資源管理」:101-120,花蓮:太魯閣國家公園管理處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏愛靜,1997,「原住民保留地與公有土地資源管理制度之研究(I)」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏愛靜,1999,「原住民保留地與公有土地資源管理制度之研究(II)」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏愛靜,1999,「原住民保留地與公有土地資源管理制度之研究(Ⅲ)」,行政院國科會專案研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏愛靜,1999,『臺灣地區原住民保留地制度變遷之研究』,台北:行政院原住民委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏愛靜、楊國柱,2004,『原住民族土地制度與經濟發展』,台北:稻香出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏愛靜、官大偉,2004,「傳統制度與制度選擇—新竹縣尖石鄉兩個泰雅族部落土地資源自主治理案例分析」、『地理學報』(37):27-49。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏愛靜,2005,「原住民族土地及海域法與原住民族土地調查及處理委員會組織法之研究」,台北:行政院原住民族委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邊泰明,1997,「限制發展土地之補償策略與財產權配置」,『土地經濟年刊』(8)期:154-168。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、外文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anaya, S. J., 1996, Indigenous Peoples in International Law. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bass, S. Barry, D. C. and Jules P., 1995, Participation in strategies for sustainable development. International Institute for Environment and Development, (IIED), UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berkes, F., 1999, Sacred Ecology – Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management, Taylor & Francis, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burger, Julian., 1991, Indigenous Peoples: New Rights for Old Wrongs in Peter Davies (ed.), Human Rights, The United Nations.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bystydzienski, J. and Schancht, S. eds., 2001, Forging radical alliances acrossdifference: coalition politics for the new millennium, Colo: Rowman & Littlefield.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A.D., 1972, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: On View of the Cathedral, Harvard Law Review, 85(6).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cernea, M. M., 1985, Putting people first – sociological variables in rural development. Published for the World Bank, Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daes, Erica-Irene A, 2001a, Indigenous Peoples and their relationship to land, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daes, Erica-Irene A, 2001b, Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Indigenous Peoples Report of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations on its nineteenth session, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Demsetz, H., 1967, Toward a Theory of Property Rights, American Economic Review , 57: 347- 59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Durning, Alan Thein. 1992, Guardians of the Land: Indigenous Peoples and the Health of the Earth. Worldwatch Paper 112. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Escobar, 1998, Whose knowledge, whose nature? biodiversity, conservation, and political ecology of social movement, Journal of Political Ecology, 5: 53- 82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Giordano, M., 2003, The Geography of the Commons: The Role of Scale andSpace, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2): 365- 375.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guibernau, M., 1999, Nations without States:Political Community in a Global Age.Malden:BlackWell.113zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gutmann, A., 1994, Introduction, in Amy Gutmann, ed, Multiculturalism,: 3-24. Princeton: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kohn, H., 1968, International Encyclopedia of the Social Science, Nationalism, in David L. Sills Ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Konig, M., 1999, Cultural Diversity and Language Policy, International Social Science Journal, 51(161).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kymlicka, W., 1998, Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Larsen, S. C., 2003, Promoting aboriginal territoriality through interethnic alliance: the case of the Cheslatta T`en in Northern British Columbia, Human Organization, 63(1): 74- 84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lerner, Natan. 1991, Groups Rights and Discrimination in Interna- tional Law. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Long D. and Dickason, O., 2000, Visions of the heart: Candian aboriginal issues. 2nd ed., Toronto: Harcourt Canada.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNeely, J. A., K. R. Miller, W. V. Reid, R. A. Mittermeier and T. B. Werner. 1990, Conserving the World_s Biological Diversity., INCN, Gland, Switzerland.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mohamed, M. and Ventura, S., 2000, Use of geomatics for mapping and documenting indigenous tenure systems, Society and Natural Resources, 13: 223- 236.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nesti, Lorenzo, 1999, Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Land: International Standards and Possible Developments.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nichols, S. and Rakai, M., 2001., Land Reform Canadian Style: An Overview of Aboriginal Rights and Land Claims Settlements. Land Reform Bulletin, Issue 2001/1, FAO, Rome.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) North, D. C., 1981, Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: W. W. Norton.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) North, D. C., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) North, D. C., 1994, Economic performance through time, Alfred Nobel memorial prize lecture in economic science, American Economic Review, 84: 359- 368.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ostrom, E., 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Parekh, B., 2000, Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peet, R. and Watts, M. eds., 1996, Liberation ecologies: environment, development,social movement, New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reynold, A. N., 2001, Studies in Islamic Mysticism, New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shih, C. F., 1991, A Multivariate Model of Ethnic Diversity and Violent Political Behavior, Ph.D dissertation. Department of Political Science, the Ohio State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith D. A., 1983, Theories of Nationalism, New York: Holmes&Meier.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith D. A., 1995, Nations and Nationalism in Global Era, Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Snyder, L. L., 1982, Global Mini-Nationalisms-Autonomy or Independence, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sparke, M., 1998, A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, andthe narration of nation, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88:463- 495.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steiner, H., 1998, Territorial Justice, Theories of Secession. London:Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tang, C. P. and Tang, S. Y., 2001, Negotiated autonomy : transforming self-governing. institutions for local common-pool resources in tribal villages in Taiwan, Human Ecology, 29(1): 49-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, C. and Gutmann, A, 1994, Multiculturalism:Examining the Politics of Recognition ,New Jersey: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tully, J., 2000, The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom, in Duncan Ivison, Paul Patton, and Will Sanders, eds. Political History and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, :36-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) United Nation Economic and Social Council, 2001, Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Indigenous People and Minoruties.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walker, P. and Peters, P., 2001, Maps, metaphors, and meanings: boundary struggles and village forest use on private and state land in Malawi, Society and Natural Resources, 14: 411- 424.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Warren, K., 1998, Indigenous movements and their critics: Pan- Maya activism in Guatemala. Princeton.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Webster, C. and Lai, W. C., 2003, Property right, Planning and Markets-Managing Spontaneous Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilmer, F., 1993, The Indigenous Voice in World Politics, California: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson, E. O., 1992, The Diversity of Life, Cambridge. Mass., USA:Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zazueta, A., 1995, Policy hits the ground: participation and equity in environmental policy-making. USA: World Resources Institute.zh_TW