dc.contributor.advisor | 林森田 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lin,Sen Tyan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 葉艾青 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Yeh, Ai Ching | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 葉艾青 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Yeh, Ai Ching | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2006 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 9-Apr-2010 18:38:17 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 9-Apr-2010 18:38:17 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-Apr-2010 18:38:17 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0094257017 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38842 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 地政研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 94257017 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 95 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 為有效促進土地使用、環境保護及引導都市發展,美國形成所謂「成長管理運動」,藉以提昇整體土地效用,並符合隨時代變遷而呈現多樣化的土地開發行為。然在土地使用規劃與管制的執行中,常涉及個別土地所有權人的財產權範圍與社會公經濟外部性間的考量;就土地使用規劃與管制對整體土地利用價值而言,可有所提升並降低開發所產生的負外部性;但就個別而言,當土地受到一定程度上之限制時,將會影響土地所有權人於土地所能從事的經濟活動、土地使用及其交易價值,且多重的管制往往導致土地所有權人權益因此受到限縮或喪失,是以為求合理的私有財產權保障,也相對興起了「私有財產權運動」,以尋求管制下的公平對待。就社會整體而言,負面外部性的降低與正面外部性的營造有其必要,但更嚴格的管制也意味著人民私有財產權的重新界定,從而在土地使用規則與管制的執行上,產生了成長管理運動與私有財產權運動兩種不同面向的思潮與措施。是以本研究欲就成長管理運動與私有財產權運動之理念執行,以實證分析影響美國州政府採行成長管理運動或私有財產權運動之因素,期望藉由此兩種運動的執行理念與探討,作為我國執行土地使用規劃與管制對土地財產權界定與重新界定之參考與借鏡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In order to promote efficient land use and protect environment as well as lead urban development, the Growth Management Movement has emerged in USA. However, the implementation of land use planning and control will unavoidable affect the domain of private property rights and the public interests in terms of externality. Although land use planning and control can reduce the negative externality of land development, the limitation on private land will attenuate private property rights and result in the loss of landowners’ property rights and land value. The Private Property Rights Movement arises so as to pursue a reasonable protection of property rights and to have an equal treatment under land use control. From the society viewpoint, land use control is employed to modify the market failure so as to reduce the negative externality and increase positive externality, but the implementation of tighter land use control means that the landowners’ property rights are redefined and attenuated. That how far is too far is always a controversy and lead to the emergence of two opposite movements i.e. the Growth Management Movement and The Private Property Rights Movement. This study intends to investigate the concept of and to analyze the influence factors of both movements so as to use a mirror for Taiwan’s land use planning and control which assigns and reassigns the property rights of land. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 Ⅰ圖目錄 Ⅱ表目錄 Ⅲ第一章 緒論 1-1第一節 研究動機與目的 1-1第二節 研究範圍與限制 1-4第三節 研究方法與流程 1-7第二章 理論基礎與相關研究探討 2-1第一節 財產權理論 2-1第二節 相關研究探討 2-5第三節 小結 2-11第三章 美國成長管理運動之探討 3-1第一節 成長管理運動理念之探討 3-1第二節 成長管理運動之執行分析 3-7第三節 小結 3-21第四章 美國私有財產權運動之探討 4-1第一節 私有財產權運動理念之探討 4-1第二節 私有財產權運動發展與相關判例分析 4-6第三節 小結 4-26第五章 成長管理運動與私有財產權運動之比較分析 5-1第一節 理念與執行比較分析 5-1第二節 影響因素實證分析 5-7第三節 小結 5-20第六章 結論 6-1參考文獻 i | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 62882 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 117411 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 73590 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 86089 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 177392 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 208563 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 273709 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 1128742 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 553601 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 111470 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 141967 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094257017 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 成長管理 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 財產權 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 規劃管制 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 土地使用 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | growth management | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | property rights | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | planning control | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | land use | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 以財產權觀點探討美國成長管理運動與私有財產權運動 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | The Study of American Growth Management And Private Property Rights Movements : Property Rights Perspective | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文文獻 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (一)中文專書 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.王濟川、郭志剛,2005,「Logistic迴歸模型-方法及應用」,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.賴宗裕,1999,「都市成長與土地開發管理」,台北:華泰文化事業公司。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Douglass North,劉瑞華譯,1994,「制度變遷與經濟成就」,台北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.Douglass North,劉瑞華譯,1995,「經濟史的結構與變遷」,台北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (二)學位與研究論文 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.張婉宜,2001,土地登記制度對財產權保障之研究-從新制度經濟學之觀點,國立政治大學地政系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.賴宗裕,2003,從成長管理到智慧型成長-理念與應用的發展,2003第一屆土地學術研討會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文文獻 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (一)英文專書 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.American Planning Association, 2002, Planning For Smart Growth-2002 State of the States, Smart Growth Network. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Brazel Y., 1997, Economic analysis of property rights, New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Dana, D. A. and Merrill, T. W., 2002, Property:Takings, New York: Foundation Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.DeGrove, J. M., 1992, The new frontier for land policy : planning and growth management in the States, Cambridge, Mass. : Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.DeGrove, J. M., 2005, Planning Policy and Politics─Smart Growth and the States, Cambridge, Mass. : Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.Frank, R. M.、,Merriam, D. H. and Meltz, R., 1999, The Takings Issue:Constitutional Limits on Land-Use Control and Environmental Regulation, Washington, D.C.:Island Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.Fishcel, W. A., 1995, Regulatory Takings:Law, Economics, and Politics, Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.Heyen P., 2000, The Economic Way of Thinking. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice-Hall | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.Jacobs, H. M., 2006, The Taking of Europe:Globalizing the American Ideal of Private Property ?(Working Paper), Cambridge, MA:Lincoln Institute of Land policy. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10.Juergensmeger, J. C. and Roberts, T. E., 1998, Land Use Planning and Control Law, West Group. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11.Levy, J. M., 1994, Contemporary Urban Planning, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice Hall. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12.Mercuro N., 1992, Taking Property and Just Compensation-Lae and Economics Perspectives of The Takings Issue, Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13.Olivetti, A. M., Jr., and Worsham J., 2003, This Land is Your Land, This Land is My Land:The Property Rights Movement and Regulatory Takings, New York:LFB Scholarly Publisher | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14.Priest, D. E., 1975, Epilogue:Managed Growth and The Future of City Building, in Management and Control of Growth, 3, edited by Scott, R. W., Brower, D. J. and Miner, D. D., Management & Control of Growth:Issues, Techniques, Problems and Trends, The Urban Land Institute | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15.Scott, R. W., Brower, D. J. and Miner, D.D., 1975, Management & Control of Growth:Issues, Techniques, Problems and Trends, The Urban Land Institute. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16.Templin, E. E., 1992, Managing Community Growth and Change, 3, Bibliography of Education Material for Locue officials on Growth Management, working papers, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17.Zovanyi G., 1998, Growth Management for a Sustainable Future: Ecological Sustainability to The New Growth Management Focus for The 21stst Century, Praeger. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (二)會議與博士論文 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.Cowell, P. F., 2006,“Property Valuation in the 21 Century”, paper presented at Toward a 2015 Vision of Land, Taipei, Taiwan, October 24-25. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Knaap, G. J., 2004, “A Requiem for Smart Growth?”, paper presented at Planning Reform in the New Century, Washington University Law School, St. Louis, Mo, December, 2004 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Knaap, G. J., 2006,“The Sprawl of Economics”, paper presented at Toward a 2015 Vision of Land, Taipei, Taiwan, October 24-25. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.Olivetti, A. M., 1999, Protecting Property Rights in American, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of West Virginia, West Virginia, Morgantown. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (三)英文期刊與文章 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.Alchian A. and Demsetz, P. Z., 1973, “The Property Rights Paradigm”, The Journal of Economic History, 33(1):16-26. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Anderson, T. L. and Hill, P. J., 1983, “Privatizing the Commons:An Improvement?”, Southern Economic Journal, 50(2):438-450. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Anonymous, 2006, “Eminent Domain-Public Use-Ohio Supreme Court Holds That Economic Development Cannot By Itself Satisfy the Public Use Limitation of the Ohio Constitution.-City of Norwood v. Horney, 853 N.E.2d 1115 (Ohio 2006)”, Harvard Law Review, 120(2):643-650 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.Blume L., Rubinfeld, D. L. and Shapiro P. 1984, “The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(1):71-92. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.Boudreaux, D. J.、Lipford J. And Yandle B., 1995, “Regulatory Takings and Constitutional Repair The 1990’s Property-Rights Rebellion”, Constitutional Political Economy, 6:171-290. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.Bradley J., 2006, “Property Wrongs: In Kelo’s Wake, a Raft of Anti-regulatory Initiatives from the Rights”, The American Prospect, 17(1):16-18. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.Buchanan, J. M., 1973, “The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State”Natural Resources Journal, 13:579-594. Reprinted in: James M. Buchanan and Robert T. Tollison (eds.), 1984, The Theory of Public ChoiceⅡ, p.159-173, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.Buchanan, J. M., 1999, “Politics, Property, and the Law:an Alternative interpretation of Miller et al. v. Schoene”, The Journal of Law Economics, 15(2):439-452. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.Chapin, T. S. and Connerly C. E., 2004, “Attitudes Towards Growth Management in Florida-Comparing Resident Support in 1985 and 2001”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4):443-452. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10.Costa, F., 2005, Comment: An Ambitious Movement and its Prospects for Success, Journal of American Planning Association, 71(4):378-380 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11.Cordes, M. W., 1997, “Leapforgging the Constitution: The Rise of State Takings Legislation.”, Ecology Law Quarterly, 24:187-242 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12.Demsetz, 1967, “Toward a Theory Property Rights”, American Economic Review, 57(2):347-359. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13.Downs A., 2005, “Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More Than We Do It”, APA Journal, 71(4):367-380. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14.Eagle, S. T., 2000,“Del Monte Dunes, Good Faith, and Land Use Regulation”The Environmental Law Report─News & Analysis Journal, 30:10100-10110. Retrieved April 15,2007 from Environmental Law Institute, on the World Wide Web: http://www.elr.info/index.cfm | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15.Eagle, S. T., 2005, “The Birth of The Property Rights Movement”, Policy Analysis, 558:1-42. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16.Emerson K. and Wise, C. R., 1997, “Statutory Approaches to Regulatory Takings:State Property Rights Legislature Issues and Implications for Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, 57(5):411-422. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17.Epstein, R. E., 2005,“A Popular Insurrection on Property Rights”, Free, 55(9):8-10. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18.Folsom, R. E., 1993,“Executive Order 12630: A President’s Manipulation of the Fifth Amendment’s Just Compensation Clause to Achieve Control over Executive Agency Regulatory Decisionmaking? ”, Boston College Environmental Affair Law Review, 20(4):639-697. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19.Furubotn, E. G. and Pejovich S., 1972, “Property Rights and Economic Theory:A Survey of Recent Literature”, Journal of Economic Literature, 10(4):1137-1162. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20.Gale, D. E., 1992, “Eights State-Sponsored Growth Management Programs-A Comparative Analysis”, APA Journal, 58(2):425-439. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21.Garrett T. A. and Rothstein P., 2007, “The Taking of Prosperity? Kelo v. New London and the Economics of Eminent Domain”, St. Louis: January 2007, p.5-9. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22.Godschalk, D. R., (2000, Fall). Smart Growth Efforts around the Nation. Popular Government, 66(1)12-20. Retrieved May 15, 2007 from School of Government, on the World Wide Web: http://www.sog.unc.edu/pubs/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23.Hamin, E. M., 2003, “Legislating Growth Management, Power, Politics, and Planning”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Autumn, 69(4):368-380. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24.Hermalin, B. E., 1995, “An Economic Analysis of Takings”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11(1):64-86 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25.Higley, C. J., 2000, “City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes”, Ecology Law Quarterly, 27:603-619 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26.Jacobs, H. M., 1999a, “The Impact of State Property Rights Laws: those Laws and My Land”, Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 47(2):3-8. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27.Jacobs, H. M., 1999b, “Fight Over Land: America’s Legacy…America’s Future?”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(2):141-149. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 28.Jacobs, H. M., 2003, “The Politics of Property Rights at The National Level:Signals and Trends”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2):181-189. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29.Landis, J. D., 2006, “Growth Management Revisited”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4):411-430. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 30.Leef, G. C., 2005, “Kelo v. City of New Landon:Do We Need Eminent Domain for Economic Growth?”, Free, 55(9):13-16. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 31.L’opez, E. J. and Totah, S. M., 2007, “Kelo and Its Discontents: The Worst (or Best?) Thing to Happen to Property Rights.”, Independent Review, 11(3): 397-416. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 32.Lucas F. (2006, March). Eminent Domain Outcry Pierces State Houses. Stateline.org, Retrieved May 10, 2007 from Stateline.org, on the World Wide Web:http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNoteId=136&languageId=1&contentId-96421 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 33.Marzulla, N. G., 2002, “The Textualism of. Clarence Thoams: Anchoring The Supreme Court’s Property Rights Jurisprudence to The Constitution”, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 10(2):351-379. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 34.Miniter R., 1994, “You Just Can’t Take It Anymore:America’s Property Rights Revolt”, Policy Review, 70:40-47. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 35.O’Toole R., 2004, “A Postlander’s View of Smart Growth”, The Review of Austrian Economic, 17(2/3):203-212. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 36.Sax, J. L., 2005, “Why American has Property Rights Movement”, University of Illinois Law Review, 2005(2):513-520. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 37.Savage, D. G.., 2002,“No Time Outs For The taking”, ABA Journal , Jan 88:27. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 38.Song Y. and Knaap, G. J., 2004, “Measuring Urban Form:Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl?”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70:210-225. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 39.Song Y., 2005,“Smart Growth and Urban Development pattern a Comparative Study”, International Regional Science Review, 28(2):239-265. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 40.Staley, S. R., 2004, “Urban Planning, Smart Growth, and Economic Calculation: An Austrian Critique and Extension”, The Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2/3):265-283. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 41.Steel, B. S. and Lovrich, N. P., 2000, “Growth Management Policy and County Government:Correlates of Policy Adoption across the United States”, State and Local Government Review,32(1):7-49. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 42.Stephenson, C. E., 2006, “Ohio Supreme Court Limits Eminent Domain Power”, Lawyers USA, p.1 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 43.Strong, A. L., Mandelker, D. R. and Kelly, E. D., 1996, “Property Rights and Takings”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(1):5-15. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 44.Sandefur T. (2006, November). The Great Property-Rights Revival. Retrieved May 13, 2007 from National Review Online, on the World Wide Web: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6791 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 45.Toth, J. T., 1991, “Coleman v. Utah State Land Board: Searching for a Balanced Approach to ‘Takings’ Under the Utah Constitution”, Utah Law Review (Spring):505-529 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 46.Washington D.C., 2006,“Private Property Rights Overview”, Congressional Digest, 85(1):6-32. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 47.Washington Research Council, 2002,“Property Rights and the Growth Management Act”, December 17:1-6, Retrieved March 15, 2007, from Washington Research Council, on the World Wide Web: http://www.researchcouncil.org/publications_container/GMA7.pdf | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 48.Weinberger, A. M., 2007, “Economic Benefits Alone Are Insufficient to Justly the Taking of Property by Eminent Domain”, The Appraisal Journal, 75(2):91-92. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 49.Weinstein, A. C., 2006a, “Ohio Supreme Court Rules Against City in Norwood”, Planning, 72(9):50-51 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 50.Weinstein, A. C., 2006b, “Eminent Domain: Judicial and Legislative Responses to Kelo”, Planning & Environmental Law, 58(11):3-10 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 51.White, S. S., 2000, “State Property Rights Laws:Recent Impacts and Future Implications”, Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 52(7):3-9. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 52.Wise C., 1992, “New Life for The Fifth Amendment:The Supreme Court’s New Doctrine of Regulatory Takings”, Public Administration Quarterly, 16(3):303-325. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 三、參考網站 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.美國人口普查局 http://www.census.gov/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.美國勞工統計局 http://www.bls.gov/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.美國農業部 http://www.nass.usda.gov/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.美國財政部 http://www.irs.ustreas.gov/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.美國共和黨州長委員會 http://www.rga.org/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.美國民主黨州長委員會 http://www.democraticgovernors.org/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.美國地圖相關網站 www.theodora.com/maps | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.維基百科網站 http://zh.wikipedia.org/ | zh_TW |